Certain Pasta From Italy: Extension of Time Limit for the Preliminary Results of the Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, 6604 [2011-2636]
Download as PDF
6604
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 25 / Monday, February 7, 2011 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–475–819]
Certain Pasta From Italy: Extension of
Time Limit for the Preliminary Results
of the Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: February 7, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Scott Holland or Chris Siepmann, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 1, Import
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone (202) 482–1279 and (202)
482–7958, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
On August 31, 2010, the U.S.
Department of Commerce
(‘‘Department’’) published a notice of
initiation of administrative review of the
countervailing duty order on certain
pasta from Italy, covering the period
January 1, 2009, through December 31,
2009. See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews and Deferral of Initiation of
Administrative Review, 75 FR 53274
(August 31, 2010). The preliminary
results of this administrative review are
currently due no later than April 2,
2011.
Statutory Time Limits
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’),
requires the Department to issue the
preliminary results of an administrative
review within 245 days after the last day
of the anniversary month of a
countervailing duty order for which a
review is requested and issue the final
results within 120 days after the date on
which the preliminary results are
published. However, if it is not
practicable to complete the review
within the time period, section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the
Department to extend these deadlines to
a maximum of 365 days and 180 days,
respectively.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Dated: January 31, 2011.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2011–2636 Filed 2–4–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Background
Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary
Results
The Department requires additional
time to review and analyze submitted
information and to issue supplemental
questionnaires. Therefore, it is not
practicable to complete the preliminary
results of this review within the original
VerDate Mar<15>2010
time limit, and the Department is
extending the time limit for completion
of the preliminary results by 120 days.
The preliminary results will now be due
no later than August 1, 2011, the first
business day following 120 days from
the current deadline. See Notice of
Clarification: Application of ‘‘Next
Business Day’’ Rule for Administrative
Determination Deadlines Pursuant to
the Tariff Act of 1930, as Amended,
70 FR 24533 (May 10, 2005). The final
results continue to be due 120 days after
the publication of the preliminary
results.
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(3)(A)
and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
17:16 Feb 04, 2011
Jkt 223001
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Arbitration Panel Decision Under the
Randolph-Sheppard Act
Department of Education.
Notice of arbitration panel
decision under the Randolph-Sheppard
Act.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of Education
(Department) gives notice that on
September 28, 2010, an arbitration panel
rendered a decision in the matter of Ron
Armstrong v. Ohio Rehabilitation
Commission, Bureau of Services for the
Blind and Visually Impaired, Case no.
R–S/08–4. This panel was convened by
the Department under 20 U.S.C. 107d–
1(a), after the Department received a
complaint filed by the petitioner, Ron
Armstrong.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: You
may obtain a copy of the full text of the
arbitration panel decision from Suzette
E. Haynes, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
room 5022, Potomac Center Plaza,
Washington, DC 20202–2800.
Telephone: (202) 245–7374. If you use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD), call the Federal Relay Service
(FRS), toll-free, at 1–800–877–8339.
Individuals with disabilities may
obtain this document in an accessible
format (e.g., braille, large print,
audiotape, or computer diskette) on
request to the contact person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under
section 6(c) of the Randolph-Sheppard
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Act (Act), 20 U.S.C. 107d–2(c), the
Secretary publishes in the Federal
Register a synopsis of each arbitration
panel decision affecting the
administration of vending facilities on
Federal and other property.
Background
Ron Armstrong (Complainant) alleged
violations by the Ohio Rehabilitation
Services Commission, Bureau of
Services for the Blind and Visually
Impaired, the State licensing agency
(SLA), under the Act and implementing
regulations in 34 CFR part 395.
Specifically, Complainant alleged that
the SLA improperly administered the
Ohio Randolph-Sheppard Vending
Facility Program in violation of the Act,
implementing regulations under the
Act, and State rules and regulations.
Complainant further alleged that the
SLA’s selection committee denied him
an opportunity to manage Vending
Facility 495 by inappropriately applying
selection criteria that led to another
candidate being selected to manage
Vending Facility 495.
Prior to Complainant applying for
Vending Facility 495 in 2006, he had
managed the facility part-time for four
years. Complainant requested a State
fair hearing on the SLA’s decision to
award Vending Facility 495 to another
candidate. A State fair hearing on this
matter was held. On December 8, 2008,
the hearing officer issued a decision
denying Complainant’s grievance. On
January 6, 2009, the SLA adopted the
hearing officer’s decision as final agency
action. Complainant sought review of
the SLA’s final agency by a Federal
arbitration panel.
According to the arbitration panel, the
issues to be resolved were: (1) Whether
the selection committee violated the
Ohio Administrative Code (OAC) when
it applied the 2006 labor goal to
determine a labor percentage for 2005
for both Complainant and the other
candidate when there did not exist a
labor goal in 2005 and the 2006 rule
required application of labor
percentages for two years; (2) Whether
the selection committee considered all
of the documents in both the
Complainant’s and the other candidate’s
vending operator files as required by the
OAC; (3) Whether the selection
committee invited the grantor (building
representative) to participate on the
selection committee as required by the
OAC; and (4) What the remedy should
be if the provisions of the Act or any of
the implementing regulations and state
rules and regulations were violated.
E:\FR\FM\07FEN1.SGM
07FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 25 (Monday, February 7, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 6604]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-2636]
[[Page 6604]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-475-819]
Certain Pasta From Italy: Extension of Time Limit for the
Preliminary Results of the Countervailing Duty Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: February 7, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Holland or Chris Siepmann, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 1, Import Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC
20230; telephone (202) 482-1279 and (202) 482-7958, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On August 31, 2010, the U.S. Department of Commerce
(``Department'') published a notice of initiation of administrative
review of the countervailing duty order on certain pasta from Italy,
covering the period January 1, 2009, through December 31, 2009. See
Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews and Deferral of Initiation of Administrative Review, 75 FR
53274 (August 31, 2010). The preliminary results of this administrative
review are currently due no later than April 2, 2011.
Statutory Time Limits
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the
Act''), requires the Department to issue the preliminary results of an
administrative review within 245 days after the last day of the
anniversary month of a countervailing duty order for which a review is
requested and issue the final results within 120 days after the date on
which the preliminary results are published. However, if it is not
practicable to complete the review within the time period, section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the Department to extend these deadlines
to a maximum of 365 days and 180 days, respectively.
Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results
The Department requires additional time to review and analyze
submitted information and to issue supplemental questionnaires.
Therefore, it is not practicable to complete the preliminary results of
this review within the original time limit, and the Department is
extending the time limit for completion of the preliminary results by
120 days. The preliminary results will now be due no later than August
1, 2011, the first business day following 120 days from the current
deadline. See Notice of Clarification: Application of ``Next Business
Day'' Rule for Administrative Determination Deadlines Pursuant to the
Tariff Act of 1930, as Amended, 70 FR 24533 (May 10, 2005). The final
results continue to be due 120 days after the publication of the
preliminary results.
This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections
751(a)(3)(A) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: January 31, 2011.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2011-2636 Filed 2-4-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P