AT&T; Reynoldsburg, OH; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration, 5831-5832 [2011-2242]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
5831
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 22 / Wednesday, February 2, 2011 / Notices
user fee schedule for Federal agencies
requesting name-based background
checks of the FBI’s Central Records
System through the National Name
Check Program for noncriminal justice
purposes. The total resource costs
associated with providing these name
check services have been calculated to
ensure full reimbursement to the FBI.
DATES: This fee schedule is effective
March 4, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: FBI,
RMD, National Name Check Program
Section, 170 Marcel Drive, Winchester,
Virginia 22602, Attention: Michael
Cannon, (540) 868–4400.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Pursuant to the authority in Public
Law 101–515, as amended, the FBI has
established user fees for Federal
agencies requesting noncriminal namebased background checks of the Central
Records System (CRS) through the
National Name Check Program (NNCP)
of the Records Management Division
(RMD). The regulations governing the
revision of these user fees are set out at
28 CFR 20.31(e and f). In accordance
with 28 CFR 20.31(e), the FBI is
required to periodically review the
amount of the fees it collects for the
NNCP to determine the current cost of
processing name checks for noncriminal
justice purposes and publish any
resulting fee adjustments in the Federal
Register.
Accordingly, the FBI conducted a fee
study to assess the proper fee amounts
that should be collected by the FBI.
In accordance with 28 CFR
20.31(e)(2), the fee study employed the
same Activity Based Cost (ABC)
accounting method detailed in the Final
Rule establishing the process for setting
fees (75 FR 24796 (May 6, 2010)). The
ABC methodology is consistent with
widely accepted accounting principles
Fee currently
in effect
Service
Electronic Submission:
Batch Process Only ........................................................................................................
Batch + File Review .......................................................................................................
Manual Submission ...............................................................................................................
Expedited Submission ...........................................................................................................
This new fee schedule will become
effective on March 4, 2011.
Dated: January 25, 2011.
Robert S. Mueller, III,
Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation.
[FR Doc. 2011–2212 Filed 2–1–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–74,689]
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Amdocs, Inc., Global Support Services,
Advertising And Media AT&T Division,
New Haven, Connecticut; Notice of
Affirmative Determination Regarding
Application for Reconsideration
By application dated December 22,
2010, legal counsel of a member of the
subject worker group requested
administrative reconsideration of the
negative determination regarding
workers’ eligibility to apply for Trade
Adjustment Assistance (TAA)
applicable to workers and former
workers of Amdocs, Inc., Global
Support Services, Advertising and
Media AT&T Division, New Haven,
Connecticut (subject firm). The negative
determination was issued on November
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:00 Feb 01, 2011
Jkt 223001
and complies with the provisions of 31
U.S.C. 9701 and other applicable
Federal law. The fee study identified all
direct and indirect costs associated with
the name-based background checks
incurred by the FBI in fiscal year 2009.
These costs were analyzed by the ABC
model to project the total reimbursable
costs, by fee category, for fiscal year
2011.
The fee study recommended several
adjustments to the current user fees,
which have been in effect since October
1, 2007. Pursuant to the fee study, the
fees imposed for electronic submissions
will be increased, while the fees for
manual and expedited submissions will
be decreased. The following table
details the fee amounts for Federal
agencies requesting name-based
background checks of the FBI’s CRS
through the NNCP for noncriminal
justice purposes.
9, 2010. The Notice of determination
was published in the Federal Register
on November 23, 2010 (75 FR 71461).
The negative determination was based
on the findings that the worker
separations are not attributable to
increased imports or a shift of services
by the workers’ firm. Specifically,
services shifted to a foreign country by
Amdocs, Inc. did not contribute
importantly to worker separations in
Global Support Services, Advertising
and Media AT&T Division.
The investigation also revealed that
the firm is not a Supplier or
Downstream Producer to a firm with a
TAA-certified worker group.
In the request for reconsideration, the
petitioner alleged that the workers of the
Advertising and Media Division are
eligible to apply for TAA because
Section 222(a) and/or Section 222(c) of
the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, has
been met.
The Department has carefully
reviewed the request for reconsideration
and the existing record, and has
determined that the Department will
conduct further investigation to
determine if the petitioning workers
meet the eligibility requirements of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended.
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Change in fee
amount
$1.50
29.50
56.00
56.00
Revised fee
$0.50
9.00
(5.25)
(5.25)
$2.00
38.50
50.75
50.75
Conclusion
After careful review of the
application, I conclude that the claim is
of sufficient weight to justify
reconsideration of the U.S. Department
of Labor’s prior decision. The
application is, therefore, granted.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 21st day of
January, 2011.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2011–2241 Filed 2–1–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–74,700]
AT&T; Reynoldsburg, OH; Notice of
Affirmative Determination Regarding
Application for Reconsideration
By application dated January 6, 2011,
by three petitioners requested
administrative reconsideration of the
negative determination regarding
workers’ eligibility to apply for Trade
Adjustment Assistance (TAA)
applicable to workers and former
workers of AT&T, Reynoldsburg, Ohio
E:\FR\FM\02FEN1.SGM
02FEN1
5832
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 22 / Wednesday, February 2, 2011 / Notices
workers of the subject firm. The denial
notice was signed on October 29, 2010,
and was published in the Federal
Register on November 17, 2010 (75 FR
70296).
The negative determination of the
TAA petition filed on behalf of workers
at International Business Machines
(IBM), Software Group Business Unit,
Optim Data Studio Tools QA, San Jose,
California was based on the finding that
that Criterion (1) has not been met
because fewer than three workers were
separated from Optim Data Studio Tools
QA and further separations are not
threatened.
In the request for reconsideration the
petitioner stated that there were three
more additional IBM employees
working on the relevant product within
the Data Studio Tools QA on a part-time
basis and that the development for this
product was shifted to a foreign country.
The Department has carefully
reviewed the request for reconsideration
and the existing record, and has
determined that the Department will
conduct further investigation to
determine if the petitioning workers
meet the eligibility requirements of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended.
Conclusion
After careful review of the
application, I conclude that the claim is
of sufficient weight to justify
reconsideration of the U.S. Department
of Labor’s prior decision. The
application is, therefore, granted.
Conclusion
After careful review of the
application, I conclude that the claim is
of sufficient weight to justify
reconsideration of the U.S. Department
of Labor’s prior decision. The
application is, therefore, granted.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 21st day of
January, 2011.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 21st day of
January 2011.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2011–2242 Filed 2–1–11; 8:45 am]
[FR Doc. 2011–2240 Filed 2–1–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–74,554]
[TA–W–73,351]
International Business Machines (IBM),
Software Group Business Unit, Optim
Data Studio Tools QA, San Jose, CA;
Notice of Affirmative Determination
Regarding Application for
Reconsideration
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
(subject firm). The determination was
issued on December 9, 2010. The
Department’s Notice of Determination
was published in the Federal Register
on January 3, 2011 (76 FR 182). The
workers supply customer care call
services.
The negative determination was based
on the findings that the worker
separations are not attributable to
increased imports or a shift of services
to a foreign country. Rather, the
investigation established that the worker
separations are attributable to the
workers’ firm shifting customer care call
services to other facilities within the
United States. The investigation also
revealed the firm is not a supplier or
downstream producer to a firm with a
TAA-certified worker group.
In the request for reconsideration, the
petitioners alleged that the subject firm
has shifted services to a foreign country.
The Department has carefully
reviewed the request for reconsideration
and the existing record, and has
determined that the Department will
conduct further investigation to
determine if the petitioning workers
meet the eligibility requirements of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended.
Sandy Alexander; Clifton, NJ; Notice of
Affirmative Determination Regarding
Application for Reconsideration
By application dated November 29,
2010, a worker and a state workforce
official requested administrative
reconsideration of the Department of
Labor’s negative determination
regarding eligibility to apply for Trade
Adjustment Assistance (TAA),
applicable to workers and former
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:00 Feb 01, 2011
Jkt 223001
By application dated January 6, 2011,
by a petitioner requested administrative
reconsideration of the negative
determination regarding workers’
eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment
Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers
and former workers of Sandy Alexander,
Clifton, New Jersey (subject firm). The
determination was issued on November
24, 2010. The Department’s Notice of
Determination was published in the
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Federal Register on December 8, 2010
(75 FR 76489). The workers are engaged
in activities related to the production of
printed materials.
The negative determination was based
on the findings that the petitioning
worker group did not meet the
eligibility criteria set forth in the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended.
In the request for reconsideration, the
petitioner supplied new information
regarding an alleged shift in production
to China.
The Department has carefully
reviewed the request for reconsideration
and the existing record, and has
determined that the Department will
conduct further investigation to
determine if the petitioning workers
meet the eligibility requirements of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended.
Conclusion
After careful review of the
application, I conclude that the claim is
of sufficient weight to justify
reconsideration of the U.S. Department
of Labor’s prior decision. The
application is, therefore, granted.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 21st day of
January, 2011.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2011–2239 Filed 2–1–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–70,123]
Electrolux Home Products, Inc.,
Electrolux Major Appliances Division,
Including On-Site Leased Workers
From Per Mar Security, Webster City,
IA; Amended Certification Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended (‘‘Act’’),
19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor
issued a Certification of Eligibility to
Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance on June 25, 2009, applicable
to workers of Electrolux Home Products,
Inc., Electrolux Major Appliances
Division, Webster City, Iowa. The notice
as published in the Federal Register on
August 19, 2009 (74 FR 41935). The
workers produce laundry equipment.
At the request of the State agency, the
Department reviewed the certification
for workers of the subject firm. The
company reports that workers leased
from Per Mar Security were employed
E:\FR\FM\02FEN1.SGM
02FEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 22 (Wednesday, February 2, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5831-5832]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-2242]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-74,700]
AT&T; Reynoldsburg, OH; Notice of Affirmative Determination
Regarding Application for Reconsideration
By application dated January 6, 2011, by three petitioners
requested administrative reconsideration of the negative determination
regarding workers' eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance
(TAA) applicable to workers and former workers of AT&T, Reynoldsburg,
Ohio
[[Page 5832]]
(subject firm). The determination was issued on December 9, 2010. The
Department's Notice of Determination was published in the Federal
Register on January 3, 2011 (76 FR 182). The workers supply customer
care call services.
The negative determination was based on the findings that the
worker separations are not attributable to increased imports or a shift
of services to a foreign country. Rather, the investigation established
that the worker separations are attributable to the workers' firm
shifting customer care call services to other facilities within the
United States. The investigation also revealed the firm is not a
supplier or downstream producer to a firm with a TAA-certified worker
group.
In the request for reconsideration, the petitioners alleged that
the subject firm has shifted services to a foreign country.
The Department has carefully reviewed the request for
reconsideration and the existing record, and has determined that the
Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the
petitioning workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act
of 1974, as amended.
Conclusion
After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S.
Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore,
granted.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 21st day of January, 2011.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2011-2242 Filed 2-1-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
