Initiation of Five-Year (“Sunset”) Review, 5563-5564 [2011-2197]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 21 / Tuesday, February 1, 2011 / Notices
recovery of costs within a reasonable
period of time. Therefore, we
disregarded these sales and used the
remaining sales as the basis for
determining normal value in accordance
with section 773(b)(1) of the Act. Based
on this test, for this final determination
we have disregarded below-cost sales by
CCPC.
Final Determination
The final antidumping duty margin is
as follows:
Manufacturer/Exporter
Weightedaverage
margin
(percent)
Chang Chun Petrochemical
Co., Ltd. ................................
3.08
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Continuation of Suspension of
Liquidation
Pursuant to section 735(c)(1)(B) of the
Act, we will instruct U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) to continue to
suspend liquidation of all entries of
PVA from Taiwan which were entered,
or withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after September 13,
2010, the date of publication of the
Preliminary Determination. Effective
upon publication of the final
determination, we will instruct CBP to
require a cash deposit or the posting of
a bond equal to the weighted-average
margins as follows: (1) The rate for
CCPC will be 3.08 percent; (2) if the
exporter is not a firm identified in this
investigation but the producer is, the
rate will be the rate established for the
producer of the subject merchandise; (3)
the rate for all other producers or
exporters will be 3.08 percent, as
discussed in the ‘‘All-Others Rate’’
section, below. These suspension-ofliquidation instructions will remain in
effect until further notice.
All-Others Rate
Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act
provides that the estimated all-others
rate shall be an amount equal to the
weighted average of the estimated
weighted-average dumping margins
established for exporters and producers
individually investigated excluding any
zero or de minimis margins and any
margins determined entirely under
section 776 of the Act. CCPC is the only
respondent in this investigation for
which the Department has calculated a
company-specific rate. Therefore, for
purposes of determining the all-others
rate and pursuant to section 735(c)(5)(A)
of the Act, we are using the weightedaverage dumping margin calculated for
CCPC, 3.08 percent. See, e.g., Notice of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:05 Jan 31, 2011
Jkt 223001
Final Determination of Sales at Less
Than Fair Value: Stainless Steel Sheet
and Strip in Coils From Italy, 64 FR
30750, 30755 (June 8, 1999), and Coated
Free Sheet Paper from Indonesia: Notice
of Preliminary Determination of Sales at
Less Than Fair Value and Postponement
of Final Determination, 72 FR 30753,
30757 (June 4, 2007) (unchanged in
Notice of Final Determination of Sales
at Less Than Fair Value: Coated Free
Sheet Paper from Indonesia, 72 FR
60636 (October 25, 2007)).
Disclosure
We will disclose the calculations
performed within five days of the date
of publication of this notice to parties in
this proceeding in accordance with 19
CFR 351.224(b).
ITC Notification
In accordance with section 735(d) of
the Act, we have notified the ITC of our
final determination. As our final
determination is affirmative and in
accordance with section 735(b)(2) of the
Act, the ITC will determine, within 45
days, whether the domestic industry in
the United States is materially injured,
or threatened with material injury, by
reason of imports or sales (or the
likelihood of sales) for importation of
the subject merchandise. If the ITC
determines that such injury does exist,
the Department will issue an
antidumping duty order directing CBP
to assess antidumping duties on all
imports of the subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the effective
date of the suspension of liquidation.
Notification Regarding APO
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely
notification of the destruction of APO
materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and the terms of an APO is a
sanctionable violation.
This determination is issued and
published pursuant to sections 735(d)
and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: January 26, 2011.
Christian Marsh,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
Appendix—Issues in Decision
Memorandum
1. Targeted Dumping
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5563
2. Product Characteristics
3. Date of Sale
4. Cost of Production
[FR Doc. 2011–2194 Filed 1–31–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’)
Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: In accordance with section
751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (‘‘the Act’’), the Department of
Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) is
automatically initiating a five-year
review (‘‘Sunset Review’’) of the
antidumping duty order listed below.
The International Trade Commission
(‘‘the Commission’’) is publishing
concurrently with this notice its notice
of Institution of Five-Year Review which
covers the same order.
AGENCY:
DATES:
Effective Date: February 1, 2011.
The
Department official identified in the
Initiation of Review section below at
AD/CVD Operations, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20230. For
information from the Commission
contact Mary Messer, Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission at (202) 205–3193.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Department’s procedures for the
conduct of Sunset Reviews are set forth
in its Procedures for Conducting FiveYear (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews of Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Orders, 63 FR
13516 (March 20, 1998) and 70 FR
62061 (October 28, 2005). Guidance on
methodological or analytical issues
relevant to the Department’s conduct of
Sunset Reviews is set forth in the
Department’s Policy Bulletin 98.3—
Policies Regarding the Conduct of FiveYear (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews of Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Orders: Policy
Bulletin, 63 FR 18871 (April 16, 1998).
Initiation of Review
In accordance with 19 CFR
351.218(c), we are initiating the Sunset
Review of the following antidumping
duty order:
E:\FR\FM\01FEN1.SGM
01FEN1
5564
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 21 / Tuesday, February 1, 2011 / Notices
DOC case No.
A–351–840 .........................
ITC case No.
731–TA–1089
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Filing Information
As a courtesy, we are making
information related to Sunset
proceedings, including copies of the
pertinent statute and Department’s
regulations, the Department schedule
for Sunset Reviews, a listing of past
revocations and continuations, and
current service lists, available to the
public on the Department’s Internet
Web site at the following address:
‘‘https://ia.ita.doc.gov/sunset/.’’ All
submissions in these Sunset Reviews
must be filed in accordance with the
Department’s regulations regarding
format, translation, service, and
certification of documents. These rules
can be found at 19 CFR 351.303.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(d), the
Department will maintain and make
available a service list for these
proceedings. To facilitate the timely
preparation of the service list(s), it is
requested that those seeking recognition
as interested parties to a proceeding
contact the Department in writing
within 10 days of the publication of the
Notice of Initiation.
Because deadlines in Sunset Reviews
can be very short, we urge interested
parties to apply for access to proprietary
information under administrative
protective order (‘‘APO’’) immediately
following publication in the Federal
Register of this notice of initiation by
filing a notice of intent to participate.
The Department’s regulations on
submission of proprietary information
and eligibility to receive access to
business proprietary information under
APO can be found at 19 CFR 351.304–
306.
Information Required From Interested
Parties
Domestic interested parties defined in
section 771(9)(C), (D), (E), (F), and (G) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.102(b) wishing
to participate in a Sunset Review must
respond not later than 15 days after the
date of publication in the Federal
Register of this notice of initiation by
filing a notice of intent to participate.
The required contents of the notice of
intent to participate are set forth at 19
CFR 351.218(d)(1)(ii). In accordance
with the Department’s regulations, if we
do not receive a notice of intent to
participate from at least one domestic
interested party by the 15-day deadline,
the Department will automatically
revoke the order without further review.
See 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(iii).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:05 Jan 31, 2011
Jkt 223001
Country
Product
Department contact
Brazil ..................................
Orange Juice .....................
David Goldberger, (202) 482–4136.
If we receive an order-specific notice
of intent to participate from a domestic
interested party, the Department’s
regulations provide that all parties
wishing to participate in the Sunset
Review must file complete substantive
responses not later than 30 days after
the date of publication in the Federal
Register of this notice of initiation. The
required contents of a substantive
response, on an order-specific basis, are
set forth at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3). Note
that certain information requirements
differ for respondent and domestic
parties. Also, note that the Department’s
information requirements are distinct
from the Commission’s information
requirements. Please consult the
Department’s regulations for
information regarding the Department’s
conduct of Sunset Reviews.1 Please
consult the Department’s regulations at
19 CFR part 351 for definitions of terms
and for other general information
concerning antidumping and
countervailing duty proceedings at the
Department.
This notice of initiation is being
published in accordance with section
751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218
(c).
Dated: January 25, 2011.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2011–2197 Filed 1–31–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Patent and Trademark Office
[Docket No. PTO–P–2011–0001]
Grant of Interim Extension of the Term
of U.S. Patent No. 4,971,802;
MIFAMURTIDE
United States Patent and
Trademark Office, Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of interim patent term
extension.
AGENCY:
1 In comments made on the interim final sunset
regulations, a number of parties stated that the
proposed five-day period for rebuttals to
substantive responses to a notice of initiation was
insufficient. This requirement was retained in the
final sunset regulations at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(4). As
provided in 19 CFR 351.302(b), however, the
Department will consider individual requests to
extend that five-day deadline based upon a showing
of good cause.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The United States Patent and
Trademark Office has issued a
certificate under 35 U.S.C. 156(d)(5) for
a fourth one-year interim extension of
the term of U.S. Patent No. 4,971,802.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Raul
Tamayo by telephone at (571) 272–7728;
by mail marked to his attention and
addressed to the Commissioner for
Patents, Mail Stop Hatch-Waxman PTE,
P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313–
1450; by fax marked to his attention at
(571) 273–7728, or by e-mail to Raul.
Tamayo@uspto.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
156 of Title 35, United States Code,
generally provides that the term of a
patent may be extended for a period of
up to five years if the patent claims a
product, or a method of making or using
a product, that has been subject to
certain defined regulatory review, and
that the patent may be extended for
interim periods of up to a year if the
regulatory review is anticipated to
extend beyond the expiration date of the
patent.
On September 30, 2010, IDM Pharma,
agent/licensee of patent owner Novartis,
timely filed an application under 35
U.S.C. 156(d)(5) for a fourth interim
extension of the term of U.S. Patent No.
4,971,802. Claims of the patent cover
muramyl tripeptide phosphatidyl
ethanolamine, which is labeled as the
active ingredient in the human drug
product Mifamurtide. The application
indicates, and the Food and Drug
Administration has confirmed, that a
New Drug Application for the human
drug product Mifamurtide has been
filed and is currently undergoing
regulatory review before the Food and
Drug Administration for permission to
market or use the product commercially.
Review of the application indicates
that, except for permission to market or
use the product commercially, the
subject patent would be eligible for an
extension of the patent term under 35
U.S.C. 156, and that the patent should
be extended for an additional year as
required by 35 U.S.C. 156(d)(5)(B).
Because it is apparent that the
regulatory review period will continue
beyond the extended expiration date of
the patent (November 20, 2010), interim
extension of the patent term under 35
U.S.C. 156(d)(5) is appropriate.
A fourth interim extension under 35
U.S.C. 156(d)(5) of the term of U.S.
Patent No. 4,971,802 was granted for a
period of one year from the extended
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\01FEN1.SGM
01FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 21 (Tuesday, February 1, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5563-5564]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-2197]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Initiation of Five-Year (``Sunset'') Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: In accordance with section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (``the Act''), the Department of Commerce (``the
Department'') is automatically initiating a five-year review (``Sunset
Review'') of the antidumping duty order listed below. The International
Trade Commission (``the Commission'') is publishing concurrently with
this notice its notice of Institution of Five-Year Review which covers
the same order.
DATES: Effective Date: February 1, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Department official identified in
the Initiation of Review section below at AD/CVD Operations, Import
Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20230.
For information from the Commission contact Mary Messer, Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission at (202) 205-3193.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Department's procedures for the conduct of Sunset Reviews are
set forth in its Procedures for Conducting Five-Year (``Sunset'')
Reviews of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders, 63 FR 13516
(March 20, 1998) and 70 FR 62061 (October 28, 2005). Guidance on
methodological or analytical issues relevant to the Department's
conduct of Sunset Reviews is set forth in the Department's Policy
Bulletin 98.3--Policies Regarding the Conduct of Five-Year (``Sunset'')
Reviews of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders: Policy Bulletin,
63 FR 18871 (April 16, 1998).
Initiation of Review
In accordance with 19 CFR 351.218(c), we are initiating the Sunset
Review of the following antidumping duty order:
[[Page 5564]]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOC case No. ITC case No. Country Product Department contact
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A-351-840.......................... 731-TA-1089 Brazil................ Orange Juice.......... David Goldberger, (202) 482-4136.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Filing Information
As a courtesy, we are making information related to Sunset
proceedings, including copies of the pertinent statute and Department's
regulations, the Department schedule for Sunset Reviews, a listing of
past revocations and continuations, and current service lists,
available to the public on the Department's Internet Web site at the
following address: ``https://ia.ita.doc.gov/sunset/.'' All submissions
in these Sunset Reviews must be filed in accordance with the
Department's regulations regarding format, translation, service, and
certification of documents. These rules can be found at 19 CFR 351.303.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(d), the Department will maintain and
make available a service list for these proceedings. To facilitate the
timely preparation of the service list(s), it is requested that those
seeking recognition as interested parties to a proceeding contact the
Department in writing within 10 days of the publication of the Notice
of Initiation.
Because deadlines in Sunset Reviews can be very short, we urge
interested parties to apply for access to proprietary information under
administrative protective order (``APO'') immediately following
publication in the Federal Register of this notice of initiation by
filing a notice of intent to participate. The Department's regulations
on submission of proprietary information and eligibility to receive
access to business proprietary information under APO can be found at 19
CFR 351.304-306.
Information Required From Interested Parties
Domestic interested parties defined in section 771(9)(C), (D), (E),
(F), and (G) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.102(b) wishing to participate in
a Sunset Review must respond not later than 15 days after the date of
publication in the Federal Register of this notice of initiation by
filing a notice of intent to participate. The required contents of the
notice of intent to participate are set forth at 19 CFR
351.218(d)(1)(ii). In accordance with the Department's regulations, if
we do not receive a notice of intent to participate from at least one
domestic interested party by the 15-day deadline, the Department will
automatically revoke the order without further review. See 19 CFR
351.218(d)(1)(iii).
If we receive an order-specific notice of intent to participate
from a domestic interested party, the Department's regulations provide
that all parties wishing to participate in the Sunset Review must file
complete substantive responses not later than 30 days after the date of
publication in the Federal Register of this notice of initiation. The
required contents of a substantive response, on an order-specific
basis, are set forth at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3). Note that certain
information requirements differ for respondent and domestic parties.
Also, note that the Department's information requirements are distinct
from the Commission's information requirements. Please consult the
Department's regulations for information regarding the Department's
conduct of Sunset Reviews.\1\ Please consult the Department's
regulations at 19 CFR part 351 for definitions of terms and for other
general information concerning antidumping and countervailing duty
proceedings at the Department.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ In comments made on the interim final sunset regulations, a
number of parties stated that the proposed five-day period for
rebuttals to substantive responses to a notice of initiation was
insufficient. This requirement was retained in the final sunset
regulations at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(4). As provided in 19 CFR
351.302(b), however, the Department will consider individual
requests to extend that five-day deadline based upon a showing of
good cause.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This notice of initiation is being published in accordance with
section 751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218 (c).
Dated: January 25, 2011.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2011-2197 Filed 1-31-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P