Self-Regulatory Organizations; BATS Y-Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Proposed Rule Change To Amend BYX Rules in Connection With the Implementation of Amendments to Regulation SHO, 5420-5423 [2011-1987]
Download as PDF
5420
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 20 / Monday, January 31, 2011 / Notices
proposed Rule 11.19 states that it is the
entering Member’s responsibility, not
the Exchange’s responsibility, to comply
with the requirements of Regulation
SHO relating to marking of orders as
‘‘short exempt.’’ 20
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and the rules
and regulations thereunder that are
applicable to a national securities
exchange, and, in particular, with the
requirements of Section 6(b) of the
Act.21 In particular, the proposed
change is consistent with Section 6(b)(5)
of the Act,22 because it would promote
just and equitable principles of trade,
and, in general, protect investors and
the public interest. The Exchange
believes that the proposed changes will
provide clarity on the short sale order
handling procedures employed by the
Exchange and certain obligations of
Members when sending short sale
orders to the Exchange consistent with
Regulation SHO, as amended. The
Exchange also believes that the
proposed short sale price sliding
functionality and amendments to the
existing displayed price sliding process
will assist Users in executing or
displaying their orders consistent with
Regulation SHO and Regulation NMS,
especially under fast moving conditions
where the NBBO is quickly updating. In
addition, as is currently the case, the
amended price sliding process is
optional to Users. Specifically, Users
can choose to opt-out of the price
sliding process, and if they choose to do
so, the Exchange will cancel back their
orders when such orders contradict the
provisions of Regulation SHO or
Regulation NMS.
(B) Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change imposes any
burden on competition.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
(C) Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants or Others
The Exchange has neither solicited
nor received written comments on the
proposed rule change.
20 17 CFR 242.200(g)(2). See also 17 CFR
242.201(c); 17 CFR 242.201(d).
21 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
22 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:38 Jan 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such longer period
up to 90 days (i) as the Commission may
designate if it finds such longer period
to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which
the self-regulatory organization
consents, the Commission will:
(A) By order approve or disapprove
the proposed rule change, or
(B) Institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved.
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposal is
consistent with the Act. Comments may
be submitted by any of the following
methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–BATS–2011–002 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File No.
SR–BATS–2011–002. This file number
should be included on the subject line
if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule changes between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549. Copies of such
filing will also be available for
Frm 00093
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.23
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–1986 Filed 1–28–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
IV. Solicitation of Comments
PO 00000
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File No. SR–BATS–
2011–002 and should be submitted on
or before February 22, 2011.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–63767; File No. SR–BYX–
2011–002]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; BATS
Y-Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Proposed
Rule Change To Amend BYX Rules in
Connection With the Implementation of
Amendments to Regulation SHO
January 25, 2011.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on January
14, 2011, BATS Y-Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘BYX’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is filing with the
Commission a proposal to amend BYX
Rules 11.9, 11.13 and 11.19 to make
certain changes consistent with the
upcoming implementation of
amendments to Regulation SHO.3
The text of the proposed rule change
is available at the Exchange’s Web site
at https://www.batstrading.com, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
23 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 17 CFR 242.200(g); 17 CFR 242.201.
1 15
E:\FR\FM\31JAN1.SGM
31JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 20 / Monday, January 31, 2011 / Notices
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant parts of such
statements.
(A) Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
1. Purpose
On February 26, 2010, the
Commission adopted amendments to
Regulation SHO under the Act in the
form of Rule 201,4 pursuant to which,
among other things, short sale orders in
covered securities 5 generally cannot be
executed or displayed by a trading
center 6 such as BYX at a price that is
at or below the current national best bid
(‘‘NBB’’) when a short sale circuit
breaker is in effect for the covered
security (the ‘‘short sale price test
restriction’’).7 In anticipation of the
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 61595
(February 26, 2010), 75 FR 11232 (March 10, 2010).
In connection with the adoption of Rule 201, Rule
200(g) of Regulation SHO was also amended to
include a ‘‘short exempt’’ marking requirement. The
amendments to Rule 201 and Rule 200(g) have a
compliance date of February 28, 2011. See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 63247 (Nov. 4,
2010), 75 FR 68702 (Nov. 9, 2010). See also Division
of Trading & Markets, Responses to Frequently
Asked Questions Concerning Rule 201 of
Regulation SHO.
5 Rule 201(a)(1) defines the term ‘‘covered
security’’ to mean any ‘‘NMS stock’’ as defined
under Rule 600(b)(47) of Regulation NMS. Rule
600(b)(47) of Regulation NMS defines an ‘‘NMS
stock’’ as ‘‘any NMS security other than an option.’’
Rule 600(b)(46) of Regulation NMS defines an
‘‘NMS security’’ as ‘‘any security or class of
securities for which transaction reports are
collected, processed, and made available pursuant
to an effective transaction reporting plan, or an
effective national market system plan for reporting
transactions in listed options.’’ 17 CFR
242.201(a)(1); 17 CFR 242.600(b)(46); and 17 CFR
242.600(b)(47).
6 Rule 201(a)(9) states that the term ‘‘trading
center’’ shall have the same meaning as in Rule
600(b)(78) of Regulation NMS. Rule 600(b)(78)
defines a ‘‘trading center’’ as ‘‘a national securities
exchange or national securities association that
operates an SRO trading facility, an alternative
trading system, an exchange market maker, an OTC
market maker, or any other broker or dealer that
executes orders internally by trading as principal or
crossing orders as agent.’’ 17 CFR 242.600(b)(78).
7 17 CFR 242.201(b)(1). See also Division of
Trading & Markets, Responses to Frequently Asked
Questions Concerning Rule 201 of Regulation SHO,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:38 Jan 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
upcoming February 28, 2011
compliance date for Rule 201, the
Exchange is proposing to amend certain
BYX rules to describe the manner in
which the System 8 will handle short
sell orders when a short sale price test
restriction is triggered under Rule 201 of
Regulation SHO. These changes include
establishing a definition for ‘‘short sale
price sliding,’’ which is a new form of
price sliding the Exchange proposes to
offer when the amendments to
Regulation SHO become operative,
modifying certain BYX rules regarding
order execution and routing when a
short sale price test restriction is in
effect, and modifying BYX rules related
to order marking requirements.
Additionally, the Exchange proposes to
modify the definition of the current
‘‘displayed price sliding process’’ offered
by BYX.
In order to comply with the short sale
price test restriction of Regulation SHO,
as amended, the Exchange proposes to
offer short sale price sliding, which will
be defined in BYX Rule 11.9(g). As a
default, the Exchange will subject a
User’s 9 orders to the short sale price
sliding unless they affirmatively choose
to opt-out of the process. As proposed,
when a User opts out of the price sliding
process, any short sale order that could
not be executed or displayed due to a
short sale price test restriction would be
rejected or cancelled by the Exchange
upon entry or while resting on the order
book, respectively. When a User’s order
is subject to the price sliding process, as
proposed, orders subject to short sale
price sliding that, at the time of entry,
could not be executed or displayed due
to a short sale price test restriction will
be repriced by the System at one
minimum price variation above the
current NBB to comply with Rule
201(b)(1)(i).10 An order subject to short
sale price sliding will not be readjusted
downward even if it could be displayed
at a lower price without violation of
Rule 201 of Regulation SHO. In the
event the NBB changes such that the
price of a non-displayed order subject to
short sale price sliding would lock or
cross the NBB, the order will receive a
new timestamp, and will be repriced by
the System at one minimum price
Q&A Nos. 2.1 and 2.2 (concerning the duration of
a short sale price test restriction).
8 The ‘‘System’’ is defined in BYX Rule 1.5(aa) as
‘‘the electronic communications and trading facility
designated by the Board through which securities
orders of Users are consolidated for ranking,
execution and, when applicable, routing away.’’
9 A ‘‘User’’ is defined in BYX Rule 1.5(cc) as any
member or sponsored participant of the Exchange
who is authorized to obtain access to the System.
10 Any execution or display will also need to be
in compliance with applicable rules regarding
minimum pricing increments. 17 CFR 242.612.
PO 00000
Frm 00094
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5421
variation above the current NBB, again
in compliance with Rule 201(b)(1)(i).11
As proposed, neither orders marked
‘‘short exempt’’ nor orders displayed by
the System at a price above the then
current NBB at the time of initial
display when a short sale price test
restriction is in effect for a covered
security will be subject to short sale
price sliding. Certain displayed short
sale orders will not be repriced by the
System after entry because under Rule
201(b)(1)(iii)(A) a trading center’s
policies and procedures must be
reasonably designed to permit the
execution of short sale orders of covered
securities that were displayed at a price
above the current NBB at the time of
initial display. ‘‘Short exempt’’ orders
will not be repriced by the System, but
instead, the Exchange will execute,
display and/or route such orders
without regard to the NBB or any short
sale price test restriction in effect under
Regulation SHO, as described below.
The Exchange currently offers a
process called ‘‘displayed price sliding
process,’’ as defined in current Rule
11.9(c)(4), which re-prices and/or
displays orders at permissible prices
when such orders would lock or cross
Protected Quotations 12 in a manner
inconsistent with Rule 610(d) of
Regulation NMS.13 The Exchange
proposes to rename the ‘‘displayed price
sliding process’’ as ‘‘NMS price sliding,’’
to be included in new paragraph (g) of
Rule 11.9, and to define the ‘‘price
sliding process’’ as inclusive of both
NMS price sliding and short sale price
sliding.14 Also, consistent with the
changes described above, the Exchange
proposes to replace the term ‘‘displayed
price sliding process’’ throughout its
trading rules with the term ‘‘price
sliding process.’’ As is true for displayed
price sliding today and short sale price
sliding as proposed, if a User chooses to
opt-out of the price sliding process, the
order will not be subject to NMS price
sliding, and thus, the Exchange will
11 See Division of Trading & Markets, Responses
to Frequently Asked Questions Concerning Rule
201 of Regulation SHO, Q&A No. 4.1 (concerning
un-displayed orders).
12 As defined in BYX Rule 1.5(t), the term
‘‘Protected Quotation’’ means a quotation that is a
Protected Bid or Protected Offer. In turn, a
‘‘Protected Bid’’ or ‘‘Protected Offer’’ shall mean a
bid or offer in a stock that is (i) displayed by an
automated trading center; (ii) disseminated
pursuant to an effective national market system
plan; and (iii) an automated quotation that is the
best bid or best offer of a national securities
exchange or association.
13 17 CFR 242.610(d).
14 The Exchange acknowledges that potential
differences can exist between Protected Bids, as
defined above (see supra note 12), and the NBB,
upon which the requirements of Regulation SHO,
as amended, are based.
E:\FR\FM\31JAN1.SGM
31JAN1
5422
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 20 / Monday, January 31, 2011 / Notices
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
cancel back their orders when display or
execution of such orders contradict the
provisions of Regulation NMS.
The Exchange also proposes a
substantive change to NMS price sliding
(today known as the displayed price
sliding process). Under current System
behavior, the Exchange cancels all nondisplayed orders when the national best
bid or offer (‘‘NBBO’’) changes such that
the non-displayed order would cross a
Protected Quotation, regardless of
whether the order is subject to the
displayed price sliding process. Under
the proposed amendment, instead of
cancelling such orders, unless a User
has opted out of the price sliding
process, the Exchange proposes to allow
a resting non-displayed order to receive
a new timestamp and be repriced at the
locking price in the event that the NBBO
changes such that the order would cross
a Protected Quotation.
The Exchange also proposes to amend
its Rule 11.13 to make clear that it will
execute, display and route an order
consistent with Rule 201 of Regulation
SHO, and that if it cannot do so, orders
will be cancelled back to the applicable
Exchange User. In addition, the
Exchange proposes to make clear that it
will not route orders away from the
Exchange that are marked ‘‘short’’ if a
short sale price test restriction is in
effect. Instead, such orders, if
immediate-or-cancel (‘‘IOC’’) or market
orders, will be cancelled, and if limit
orders, will be posted to the BATS
Book,15 subject to the price sliding
process.
Finally, current Rule 11.19 requires
Exchange Users to identify short sale
orders as ‘‘short’’ when entered into the
Exchange’s System. The Exchange
proposes to add the term ‘‘short exempt’’
to Rule 11.19 because pursuant to
amended Rule 200(g) of Regulation
SHO, a broker-dealer can mark a short
sale order as either ‘‘short’’ or ‘‘short
exempt.’’16 The Exchange also proposes
to make clear in Rule 11.19 that if an
order it received is marked ‘‘short
exempt,’’ the Exchange will execute,
display and/or route the order without
regard to the NBB or any short sale price
test restriction in effect under
Regulation SHO.17 The Exchange also
proposes to make clear, as it does in
Rule 11.9(d)(1) with respect to
intermarket sweep orders, that it relies
defined in BYX Rule 1.5(e).
CFR 242.200(g). Rule 200(g)(2) provides that
a sale order shall be marked ‘‘short exempt’’ only if
the provisions of paragraphs (c) or (d) of Rule 201
of Regulation SHO are met. See also Division of
Trading and Markets: Responses to Frequently
Asked Questions Concerning Rule 201 of
Regulation SHO, Q&A Nos. 5.4 and 5.5.
17 17 CFR 242. 201(b)(1)(iii)(B).
on a Member’s 18 marking of an order, in
this case the ‘‘short exempt’’ marking,
when handling such order. Accordingly,
proposed Rule 11.19 states that it is the
entering Member’s responsibility, not
the Exchange’s responsibility, to comply
with the requirements of Regulation
SHO relating to marking of orders as
‘‘short exempt.’’ 19
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and the rules
and regulations thereunder that are
applicable to a national securities
exchange, and, in particular, with the
requirements of Section 6(b) of the
Act.20 In particular, the proposed
change is consistent with Section 6(b)(5)
of the Act,21 because it would promote
just and equitable principles of trade,
and, in general, protect investors and
the public interest. The Exchange
believes that the proposed changes will
provide clarity on the short sale order
handling procedures employed by the
Exchange and certain obligations of
Members when sending short sale
orders to the Exchange consistent with
Regulation SHO, as amended. The
Exchange also believes that the
proposed short sale price sliding
functionality and amendments to the
existing displayed price sliding process
will assist Users in executing or
displaying their orders consistent with
Regulation SHO and Regulation NMS,
especially under fast moving conditions
where the NBBO is quickly updating. In
addition, as is currently the case, the
amended price sliding process is
optional to Users. Specifically, Users
can choose to opt-out of the price
sliding process, and if they choose to do
so, the Exchange will cancel back their
orders when such orders contradict the
provisions of Regulation SHO or
Regulation NMS.
(B) Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change imposes any
burden on competition.
15 As
16 17
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:38 Jan 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
18 A ‘‘Member’’ is defined in BYX Rule 1.5(n) as
any registered broker or dealer that has been
admitted to membership in the Exchange.
19 17 CFR 242.200(g)(2). See also 17 CFR
242.201(c); 17 CFR 242.201(d).
20 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
21 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(C) Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants or Others
The Exchange has neither solicited
nor received written comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such longer period
up to 90 days (i) as the Commission may
designate if it finds such longer period
to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which
the self-regulatory organization
consents, the Commission will:
(A) By order approve or disapprove
the proposed rule change, or
(B) Institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposal is
consistent with the Act. Comments may
be submitted by any of the following
methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–BYX–2011–002 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File No.
SR–BYX–2011–002. This file number
should be included on the subject line
if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule changes between the
Commission and any person, other than
E:\FR\FM\31JAN1.SGM
31JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 20 / Monday, January 31, 2011 / Notices
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549. Copies of such
filing will also be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File No. SR–BYX–2011–
002 and should be submitted on or
before February 22, 2011.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.22
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–1987 Filed 1–28–11; 8:45 am]
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–63769; File No. SR–BX–
2011–003]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of a
Proposed Rule Change Extending the
Pilot Period To Receive Inbound
Routes of Orders From Nasdaq
Execution Services
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
January 25, 2011.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on January
19, 2011, NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc. (‘‘BX’’
or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by BX. The Exchange has designated the
proposed rule change as constituting a
non-controversial rule change under
Rule 19b–4(f)(6) under the Act,3 which
renders the proposal effective upon
filing with the Commission. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
1 15
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:38 Jan 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, BX
included statements concerning the
purpose of and basis for the proposed
rule change and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed
rule change. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in Item IV below. BX has prepared
summaries, set forth in Sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
22 17
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of the Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
BX submits this proposed rule change
to extend the pilot period of BX’s prior
approval to receive inbound routes of
equities orders from Nasdaq Execution
Services, LLC (‘‘NES’’) through June 15,
2011.
1. Purpose
Currently, NES is the approved
outbound routing facility of the
NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
(‘‘NASDAQ’’) for cash equities,
providing outbound routing from
NASDAQ to other market centers.4 BX
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 50311
(September 3, 2004), 69 FR 54818 (September 10,
2004) (Order Granting Application for a Temporary
Conditional Exemption Pursuant To Section 36(a)
of the Exchange Act by the National Association of
Securities Dealers, Inc. Relating to the Acquisition
of an ECN by The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc.) and
52902 (December 7, 2005), 70 FR 73810 (December
13, 2005) (SR–NASD–2005–128) (Order Approving
a Proposed Rule Change To Establish Rules
Governing the Operation of the INET System). See
also SR–NASDAQ–2011–004 (January 14, 2011);
Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 63083
(October 13, 2010), 75 FR 64370 (October 19, 2010)
(SR–NASDAQ–2010–127); 62736 (August 17, 2010),
75 FR 51861 (August 23, 2010) (SR–NASDAQ–
2010–100); 61682 (March 10, 2010), 75 FR 12592
(March 16, 2010) (SR–NASDAQ–2010–030); 61460
(February 1, 2010), 75 FR 6077 (February 5, 2010)
(SR–NASDAQ–2010–018); 60039 (June 3, 2009), 74
FR 27365 (June 9, 2009) (SR–NASDAQ–2009–050);
59875 (May 6, 2009), 74 FR 22794 (May 14, 2009)
(SR–NASDAQ–2009–043); 59807 (April 21, 2009),
74 FR 19251 (April 28, 2009) (SR–NASDAQ–2009–
036); 59153 (December 23, 2008), 73 FR 80485
(December 31, 2008) (SR–NASDAQ–2008–098);
58752 (October 8, 2008), 73 FR 61181 (October 15,
2008) (SR–NASDAQ–2008–079); 58135 (July 10,
2008), 73 FR 40898 (July 16, 2008) (SR–NASDAQ–
2008–061); 58069 (June 30, 2008), 73 FR 39360 (July
9, 2008) (SR–NASDAQ–2008–054); 56708 (October
26, 2007), 72 FR 61925 (November 1, 2007) (SR–
NASDAQ–2007–078); 56867 (November 29, 2007),
72 FR 69263 (December 7, 2007) (SR–NASDAQ–
2007–065); 55335 (February 23, 2007), 72 FR 9369
(March 1, 2007) (SR–NASDAQ–2007–005); 54613
(October 17, 2006), 71 FR 62325 (October 24, 2006)
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5423
also has been previously approved to
receive inbound routes of equities
orders by NES in its capacity as an order
routing facility of NASDAQ on a pilot
basis.5 The Exchange hereby seeks to
extend a previously approved pilot
period for such inbound routing (with
the attendant obligations and
conditions) for an additional 6 months
from the date of this filing through June
15, 2011.6
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the provisions of Section 6 of the Act,7
in general, and with Section 6(b)(5) of
the Act,8 in particular, in that the
proposal is designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged
in regulating, clearing, settling,
processing information with respect to,
and facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
Specifically, the proposed rule change
will allow the Exchange to continue
receiving inbound routes of equities
orders from NES acting in its capacity
as a facility of Nasdaq, in a manner
consistent with prior approvals and
established protections. The Exchange
believes that extending the previously
approved pilot period for six months is
of sufficient length to permit both the
Exchange and the Commission to assess
the impact of the Exchange’s authority
to receive direct inbound routes of
equities orders via NES (including the
attendant obligations and conditions).
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
BX does not believe that the proposed
rule change will impose any burden on
competition not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act, as amended.
(SR–NASDAQ 2006–043); 54271 (August 3, 2006),
71 FR 45876 (August 10, 2006) (SR–NASDAQ–
2006–027); and 54155 (July 14, 2006), 71 FR 41291
(July 20, 2006) (SR–NASDAQ–2006–001).
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 59154
(December 23, 2008), 73 FR 80468 (December 31,
2008) (SR–BX–2008–048); 61271 (December 31,
2009), 75 FR 1102 (January 8, 2010) (SR–BX–2009–
085); 61782 (March 25, 2010), 75 FR 16534 (April
1, 2010) (SR–BX–2010–021); 62528 (July 19, 2010),
75 FR 43210 (July 23, 2010) (SR–BX–2010–048).
6 During this pilot period, the Exchange will file
a separate proposal with the Commission seeking
permanent approval of the BX and NES Routing
Relationship.
7 15 U.S.C. 78f.
8 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
E:\FR\FM\31JAN1.SGM
31JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 20 (Monday, January 31, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5420-5423]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-1987]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-63767; File No. SR-BYX-2011-002]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; BATS Y-Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Proposed Rule Change To Amend BYX Rules in Connection With the
Implementation of Amendments to Regulation SHO
January 25, 2011.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on January 14, 2011, BATS Y-Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``BYX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is filing with the Commission a proposal to amend BYX
Rules 11.9, 11.13 and 11.19 to make certain changes consistent with the
upcoming implementation of amendments to Regulation SHO.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ 17 CFR 242.200(g); 17 CFR 242.201.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange's
Web site at https://www.batstrading.com, at the principal office of the
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
[[Page 5421]]
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such
statements.
(A) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
On February 26, 2010, the Commission adopted amendments to
Regulation SHO under the Act in the form of Rule 201,\4\ pursuant to
which, among other things, short sale orders in covered securities \5\
generally cannot be executed or displayed by a trading center \6\ such
as BYX at a price that is at or below the current national best bid
(``NBB'') when a short sale circuit breaker is in effect for the
covered security (the ``short sale price test restriction'').\7\ In
anticipation of the upcoming February 28, 2011 compliance date for Rule
201, the Exchange is proposing to amend certain BYX rules to describe
the manner in which the System \8\ will handle short sell orders when a
short sale price test restriction is triggered under Rule 201 of
Regulation SHO. These changes include establishing a definition for
``short sale price sliding,'' which is a new form of price sliding the
Exchange proposes to offer when the amendments to Regulation SHO become
operative, modifying certain BYX rules regarding order execution and
routing when a short sale price test restriction is in effect, and
modifying BYX rules related to order marking requirements.
Additionally, the Exchange proposes to modify the definition of the
current ``displayed price sliding process'' offered by BYX.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 61595 (February 26,
2010), 75 FR 11232 (March 10, 2010). In connection with the adoption
of Rule 201, Rule 200(g) of Regulation SHO was also amended to
include a ``short exempt'' marking requirement. The amendments to
Rule 201 and Rule 200(g) have a compliance date of February 28,
2011. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 63247 (Nov. 4, 2010),
75 FR 68702 (Nov. 9, 2010). See also Division of Trading & Markets,
Responses to Frequently Asked Questions Concerning Rule 201 of
Regulation SHO.
\5\ Rule 201(a)(1) defines the term ``covered security'' to mean
any ``NMS stock'' as defined under Rule 600(b)(47) of Regulation
NMS. Rule 600(b)(47) of Regulation NMS defines an ``NMS stock'' as
``any NMS security other than an option.'' Rule 600(b)(46) of
Regulation NMS defines an ``NMS security'' as ``any security or
class of securities for which transaction reports are collected,
processed, and made available pursuant to an effective transaction
reporting plan, or an effective national market system plan for
reporting transactions in listed options.'' 17 CFR 242.201(a)(1); 17
CFR 242.600(b)(46); and 17 CFR 242.600(b)(47).
\6\ Rule 201(a)(9) states that the term ``trading center'' shall
have the same meaning as in Rule 600(b)(78) of Regulation NMS. Rule
600(b)(78) defines a ``trading center'' as ``a national securities
exchange or national securities association that operates an SRO
trading facility, an alternative trading system, an exchange market
maker, an OTC market maker, or any other broker or dealer that
executes orders internally by trading as principal or crossing
orders as agent.'' 17 CFR 242.600(b)(78).
\7\ 17 CFR 242.201(b)(1). See also Division of Trading &
Markets, Responses to Frequently Asked Questions Concerning Rule 201
of Regulation SHO, Q&A Nos. 2.1 and 2.2 (concerning the duration of
a short sale price test restriction).
\8\ The ``System'' is defined in BYX Rule 1.5(aa) as ``the
electronic communications and trading facility designated by the
Board through which securities orders of Users are consolidated for
ranking, execution and, when applicable, routing away.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In order to comply with the short sale price test restriction of
Regulation SHO, as amended, the Exchange proposes to offer short sale
price sliding, which will be defined in BYX Rule 11.9(g). As a default,
the Exchange will subject a User's \9\ orders to the short sale price
sliding unless they affirmatively choose to opt-out of the process. As
proposed, when a User opts out of the price sliding process, any short
sale order that could not be executed or displayed due to a short sale
price test restriction would be rejected or cancelled by the Exchange
upon entry or while resting on the order book, respectively. When a
User's order is subject to the price sliding process, as proposed,
orders subject to short sale price sliding that, at the time of entry,
could not be executed or displayed due to a short sale price test
restriction will be repriced by the System at one minimum price
variation above the current NBB to comply with Rule 201(b)(1)(i).\10\
An order subject to short sale price sliding will not be readjusted
downward even if it could be displayed at a lower price without
violation of Rule 201 of Regulation SHO. In the event the NBB changes
such that the price of a non-displayed order subject to short sale
price sliding would lock or cross the NBB, the order will receive a new
timestamp, and will be repriced by the System at one minimum price
variation above the current NBB, again in compliance with Rule
201(b)(1)(i).\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ A ``User'' is defined in BYX Rule 1.5(cc) as any member or
sponsored participant of the Exchange who is authorized to obtain
access to the System.
\10\ Any execution or display will also need to be in compliance
with applicable rules regarding minimum pricing increments. 17 CFR
242.612.
\11\ See Division of Trading & Markets, Responses to Frequently
Asked Questions Concerning Rule 201 of Regulation SHO, Q&A No. 4.1
(concerning un-displayed orders).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As proposed, neither orders marked ``short exempt'' nor orders
displayed by the System at a price above the then current NBB at the
time of initial display when a short sale price test restriction is in
effect for a covered security will be subject to short sale price
sliding. Certain displayed short sale orders will not be repriced by
the System after entry because under Rule 201(b)(1)(iii)(A) a trading
center's policies and procedures must be reasonably designed to permit
the execution of short sale orders of covered securities that were
displayed at a price above the current NBB at the time of initial
display. ``Short exempt'' orders will not be repriced by the System,
but instead, the Exchange will execute, display and/or route such
orders without regard to the NBB or any short sale price test
restriction in effect under Regulation SHO, as described below.
The Exchange currently offers a process called ``displayed price
sliding process,'' as defined in current Rule 11.9(c)(4), which re-
prices and/or displays orders at permissible prices when such orders
would lock or cross Protected Quotations \12\ in a manner inconsistent
with Rule 610(d) of Regulation NMS.\13\ The Exchange proposes to rename
the ``displayed price sliding process'' as ``NMS price sliding,'' to be
included in new paragraph (g) of Rule 11.9, and to define the ``price
sliding process'' as inclusive of both NMS price sliding and short sale
price sliding.\14\ Also, consistent with the changes described above,
the Exchange proposes to replace the term ``displayed price sliding
process'' throughout its trading rules with the term ``price sliding
process.'' As is true for displayed price sliding today and short sale
price sliding as proposed, if a User chooses to opt-out of the price
sliding process, the order will not be subject to NMS price sliding,
and thus, the Exchange will
[[Page 5422]]
cancel back their orders when display or execution of such orders
contradict the provisions of Regulation NMS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ As defined in BYX Rule 1.5(t), the term ``Protected
Quotation'' means a quotation that is a Protected Bid or Protected
Offer. In turn, a ``Protected Bid'' or ``Protected Offer'' shall
mean a bid or offer in a stock that is (i) displayed by an automated
trading center; (ii) disseminated pursuant to an effective national
market system plan; and (iii) an automated quotation that is the
best bid or best offer of a national securities exchange or
association.
\13\ 17 CFR 242.610(d).
\14\ The Exchange acknowledges that potential differences can
exist between Protected Bids, as defined above (see supra note 12),
and the NBB, upon which the requirements of Regulation SHO, as
amended, are based.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange also proposes a substantive change to NMS price
sliding (today known as the displayed price sliding process). Under
current System behavior, the Exchange cancels all non-displayed orders
when the national best bid or offer (``NBBO'') changes such that the
non-displayed order would cross a Protected Quotation, regardless of
whether the order is subject to the displayed price sliding process.
Under the proposed amendment, instead of cancelling such orders, unless
a User has opted out of the price sliding process, the Exchange
proposes to allow a resting non-displayed order to receive a new
timestamp and be repriced at the locking price in the event that the
NBBO changes such that the order would cross a Protected Quotation.
The Exchange also proposes to amend its Rule 11.13 to make clear
that it will execute, display and route an order consistent with Rule
201 of Regulation SHO, and that if it cannot do so, orders will be
cancelled back to the applicable Exchange User. In addition, the
Exchange proposes to make clear that it will not route orders away from
the Exchange that are marked ``short'' if a short sale price test
restriction is in effect. Instead, such orders, if immediate-or-cancel
(``IOC'') or market orders, will be cancelled, and if limit orders,
will be posted to the BATS Book,\15\ subject to the price sliding
process.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ As defined in BYX Rule 1.5(e).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, current Rule 11.19 requires Exchange Users to identify
short sale orders as ``short'' when entered into the Exchange's System.
The Exchange proposes to add the term ``short exempt'' to Rule 11.19
because pursuant to amended Rule 200(g) of Regulation SHO, a broker-
dealer can mark a short sale order as either ``short'' or ``short
exempt.''\16\ The Exchange also proposes to make clear in Rule 11.19
that if an order it received is marked ``short exempt,'' the Exchange
will execute, display and/or route the order without regard to the NBB
or any short sale price test restriction in effect under Regulation
SHO.\17\ The Exchange also proposes to make clear, as it does in Rule
11.9(d)(1) with respect to intermarket sweep orders, that it relies on
a Member's \18\ marking of an order, in this case the ``short exempt''
marking, when handling such order. Accordingly, proposed Rule 11.19
states that it is the entering Member's responsibility, not the
Exchange's responsibility, to comply with the requirements of
Regulation SHO relating to marking of orders as ``short exempt.'' \19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 17 CFR 242.200(g). Rule 200(g)(2) provides that a sale
order shall be marked ``short exempt'' only if the provisions of
paragraphs (c) or (d) of Rule 201 of Regulation SHO are met. See
also Division of Trading and Markets: Responses to Frequently Asked
Questions Concerning Rule 201 of Regulation SHO, Q&A Nos. 5.4 and
5.5.
\17\ 17 CFR 242. 201(b)(1)(iii)(B).
\18\ A ``Member'' is defined in BYX Rule 1.5(n) as any
registered broker or dealer that has been admitted to membership in
the Exchange.
\19\ 17 CFR 242.200(g)(2). See also 17 CFR 242.201(c); 17 CFR
242.201(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder that
are applicable to a national securities exchange, and, in particular,
with the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\20\ In particular,
the proposed change is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\21\
because it would promote just and equitable principles of trade, and,
in general, protect investors and the public interest. The Exchange
believes that the proposed changes will provide clarity on the short
sale order handling procedures employed by the Exchange and certain
obligations of Members when sending short sale orders to the Exchange
consistent with Regulation SHO, as amended. The Exchange also believes
that the proposed short sale price sliding functionality and amendments
to the existing displayed price sliding process will assist Users in
executing or displaying their orders consistent with Regulation SHO and
Regulation NMS, especially under fast moving conditions where the NBBO
is quickly updating. In addition, as is currently the case, the amended
price sliding process is optional to Users. Specifically, Users can
choose to opt-out of the price sliding process, and if they choose to
do so, the Exchange will cancel back their orders when such orders
contradict the provisions of Regulation SHO or Regulation NMS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\21\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(B) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change imposes
any burden on competition.
(C) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others
The Exchange has neither solicited nor received written comments on
the proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period up to 90 days (i) as the
Commission may designate if it finds such longer period to be
appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
(A) By order approve or disapprove the proposed rule change, or
(B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposal is
consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the
following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-BYX-2011-002 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File No. SR-BYX-2011-002. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule changes between the Commission and any person, other
than
[[Page 5423]]
those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549. Copies of such filing will also be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File No. SR-BYX-2011-002 and should be
submitted on or before February 22, 2011.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-1987 Filed 1-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P