Sparklers From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Sunset Review and Revocation of Order, 5140-5141 [2011-1940]

Download as PDF 5140 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 19 / Friday, January 28, 2011 / Notices Period to be reviewed Shanghai Hui Ai Mal Tose Co., Ltd. Shanghai Taiside Trading Co., Ltd. Shine Bal Co., Ltd. Sichuan-Dujiangyan Dubao Bee Industrial Co., Ltd. Silverstream International Co., Ltd. Sunnice Honey Suzhou Aiyi IE Trading Co., Ltd. Suzhou Shanding Honey Product Co., Ltd. Tianjin Eulia Honey Co., Ltd. Tianjin Weigeda Trading Co., Ltd. Wanxi Haohua Food Co., Ltd. Wuhan Bee Healthy Co., Ltd. Wuhan Shino-Food Trade Co., Ltd. Wuhu Anjie Food Co., Ltd. Wuhu Deli Foods Co. Ltd. Wuhu Fenglian Co., Ltd. Wuhu Qinshi Tangye Xinjiang Jinhui Food Co., Ltd. Youngster International Trading Co., Ltd. Zhejiang Willing Foreign Trading Co. Countervailing Duty Proceedings ARGENTINA: Honey C–357–813 ........................................................................................................................................ INDIA: Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products C–533–821 ................................................................................... Ispat Industries Limited Suspension Agreements None. 1/1/10–12/31/10 1/1/10–12/31/10 3 Successor-in-interest to Alpanil Industries (75 FR 62765, 10/13/2010). the above named company does not qualify for a separate rate, all other exporters of Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) who have not qualified for a separate rate are deemed to be covered by this review as part of the single PRC entity of which the named exporters are a part. 5 If one of the above named companies does not qualify for a separate rate, all other exporters of Certain Cased Pencils from the PRC who have not qualified for a separate rate are deemed to be covered by this review as part of the single PRC entity of which the named exporters are a part. 6 If the above named company does not qualify for a separate rate, all other exporters of Hand Trucks and Parts Thereof from the PRC who have not qualified for a separate rate are deemed to be covered by this review as part of the single PRC entity of which the named exporters are a part. 7 If one of the above named companies does not qualify for a separate rate, all other exporters of Honey from the PRC who have not qualified for a separate rate are deemed to be covered by this review as part of the single PRC entity of which the named exporters are a part. WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES 4 If During any administrative review covering all or part of a period falling between the first and second or third and fourth anniversary of the publication of an antidumping duty order under 19 CFR 351.211 or a determination under 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4) to continue an order or suspended investigation (after sunset review), the Secretary, if requested by a domestic interested party within 30 days of the date of publication of the notice of initiation of the review, will determine, consistent with FAG Italia v. United States, 291 F.3d 806 (Fed. Cir. 2002), as appropriate, whether antidumping duties have been absorbed by an exporter or producer subject to the review if the subject merchandise is sold in the United States through an importer that is affiliated with such exporter or producer. The request must include the name(s) of the exporter or producer for which the inquiry is requested. For the first administrative review of any order, there will be no assessment of antidumping or countervailing duties on entries of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption during the relevant VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:10 Jan 27, 2011 Jkt 223001 provisional-measures ‘‘gap’’ period, of the order, if such a gap period is applicable to the POR. Interested parties must submit applications for disclosure under administrative protective orders in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. On January 22, 2008, the Department published Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Documents Submission Procedures; APO Procedures, 73 FR 3634 (January 22, 2008). Those procedures apply to administrative reviews included in this notice of initiation. Parties wishing to participate in any of these administrative reviews should ensure that they meet the requirements of these procedures (e.g., the filing of separate letters of appearance as discussed in 19 CFR 351.101(d)). These initiations and this notice are in accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)), and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i). PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Dated: January 24, 2011. Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2011–1958 Filed 1–27–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–804] Sparklers From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Sunset Review and Revocation of Order Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce DATES: Effective Date: December 5, 2010. SUMMARY: On November 1, 2010, the Department of Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) initiated the third sunset review of the antidumping duty order on sparklers from the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’). Because the domestic interested parties did not participate in this sunset review, the Department is revoking this antidumping duty order. AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\28JAN1.SGM 28JAN1 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 19 / Friday, January 28, 2011 / Notices FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES Jennifer Moats, AD/CVD Operations, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5047. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 18, 1991, the Department issued an antidumping duty order on sparklers from the PRC. See Antidumping Duty Order: Sparklers From the People’s Republic of China, 56 FR 27946 (June 18, 1991). On December 5, 2005, the Department published its most recent continuation of the order. See Continuation of Antidumping Duty Order: Sparklers From the People’s Republic of China, 70 FR 72425 (December 5, 2005). On November 1, 2010, the Department initiated the current sunset review of this order. See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 75 FR 67082 (November 1, 2010). We did not receive a notice of intent to participate from domestic interested parties in this sunset review by the deadline date. As a result, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(iii)(A), the Department determined that no domestic interested party intends to participate in the sunset review and, on November 22, 2010, we notified the International Trade Commission, in writing, that we intend to issue a final determination revoking this antidumping duty order. See 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(iii)(B)(2). Scope of the Order The products subject to this order are fireworks each comprising a cut-tolength wire, one end of which is coated with a chemical mix that emits bright sparks while burning. Sparklers are currently classified under subheadings 3604.10.10.00, 3604.10.90.10, and 3604.10.90.50 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (‘‘HTSUS’’). Sparklers were formerly classified under HTSUS subcategory 3604.10.00. The Department has reviewed the current categories and has determined that sparklers are currently classified in the above subcategories. Although HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise under the order is dispositive. Determination To Revoke Pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’) and 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(iii)(B)(3), if no domestic interested party files a notice of intent to participate, the Department shall, VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:05 Jan 27, 2011 Jkt 223001 within 90 days after the initiation of the review, issue a final determination revoking the order. Because the domestic interested parties did not file a notice of intent to participate in this sunset review, the Department finds that no domestic interested party is participating in this sunset review. Therefore, consistent with 19 CFR 351.222(i)(1)(i) and section 751(c)(3)(A) of the Act, we are revoking this antidumping duty order. The effective date of revocation is December 5, 2010, the fifth anniversary of the date of publication in the Federal Register of the most recent notice of continuation of this antidumping duty order. See 751(c)(6)(A)(iii) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.222(i)(2)(i). Pursuant to sections 751(c)(3)(A) and 751(c)(6)(A)(iii) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.222(i)(2)(i), the Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) to terminate the suspension of liquidation of the merchandise subject to this order entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, on or after December 5, 2010. The Department will issue instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of this notice. Entries of subject merchandise prior to the effective date of revocation will continue to be subject to suspension of liquidation and antidumping duty deposit requirements. The Department will complete any pending administrative reviews of this order and will conduct administrative reviews of subject merchandise entered prior to the effective date of revocation in response to appropriately filed requests of review. This five-year (sunset) review and notice are published in accordance with sections 751(c) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: January 19, 2011. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. 2011–1940 Filed 1–27–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration RIN 0648–XA180 Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council); Public Meeting National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Notice of a public meeting. The Pacific Fishery Management Council (Pacific Council) will convene a meeting of the Ecosystem Advisory Subpanel (EAS), which is open to the public. SUMMARY: The EAS will meet on Wednesday, February 16, 2011, beginning at 8:30 a.m. and concluding at 5 p.m., or when business for the day is completed. DATES: The EAS meeting will be held at the Hyatt Place—Portland Airport, Meeting Place #3, 9750 NE. Cascades Parkway, Portland, OR 97220; telephone: (503) 288–2808. ADDRESSES: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Effective Date of Revocation AGENCY: ACTION: 5141 Mike Burner, Staff Officer; telephone: (503) 820–2280. Please note, this is not a public hearing; it is a work session for the primary purpose of reviewing a report of the Ecosystem Plan Development Team (EPDT) and considering recommendations to the Council on the development of an Ecosystem Fishery Management Plan (EFMP). At the September 2010 Council meeting, the Council tasked the EPDT with a review of the Council’s four fishery management plans (FMPs) to identify existing ecosystem-based principles as well as common management needs that may benefit from a coordinated overarching EFMP framework. The EPDT is meeting January 26–27, 2011 and plans to provide its final report in advance of the EAS meeting. The EPDT report is also scheduled to be included in the March 2011 Council Briefing Book and be presented to the Council and its Advisory Bodies at the March 5–10, 2011 Council meeting in Vancouver, WA. EAS recommendations to the Council on the development of an EFMP are anticipated to be discussed on February 16th and may be presented to the Council in March. Although non-emergency issues not contained in the meeting agenda may come before the EAS for discussion, those issues may not be the subject of formal EAS action during this meeting. EAS action will be restricted to those issues specifically listed in this notice and any issues arising after publication of this notice that require emergency action under Section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, provided the public has been notified of the intent to take final action to address the emergency. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: E:\FR\FM\28JAN1.SGM 28JAN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 19 (Friday, January 28, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5140-5141]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-1940]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-804]


Sparklers From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of 
Sunset Review and Revocation of Order

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce

DATES: Effective Date: December 5, 2010.
SUMMARY: On November 1, 2010, the Department of Commerce (``the 
Department'') initiated the third sunset review of the antidumping duty 
order on sparklers from the People's Republic of China (``PRC''). 
Because the domestic interested parties did not participate in this 
sunset review, the Department is revoking this antidumping duty order.

[[Page 5141]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Moats, AD/CVD Operations, 
Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5047.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 18, 1991, the Department issued an 
antidumping duty order on sparklers from the PRC. See Antidumping Duty 
Order: Sparklers From the People's Republic of China, 56 FR 27946 (June 
18, 1991). On December 5, 2005, the Department published its most 
recent continuation of the order. See Continuation of Antidumping Duty 
Order: Sparklers From the People's Republic of China, 70 FR 72425 
(December 5, 2005). On November 1, 2010, the Department initiated the 
current sunset review of this order. See Initiation of Five-Year 
(``Sunset'') Review, 75 FR 67082 (November 1, 2010).
    We did not receive a notice of intent to participate from domestic 
interested parties in this sunset review by the deadline date. As a 
result, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(iii)(A), the Department 
determined that no domestic interested party intends to participate in 
the sunset review and, on November 22, 2010, we notified the 
International Trade Commission, in writing, that we intend to issue a 
final determination revoking this antidumping duty order. See 19 CFR 
351.218(d)(1)(iii)(B)(2).

Scope of the Order

    The products subject to this order are fireworks each comprising a 
cut-to-length wire, one end of which is coated with a chemical mix that 
emits bright sparks while burning. Sparklers are currently classified 
under subheadings 3604.10.10.00, 3604.10.90.10, and 3604.10.90.50 of 
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS''). 
Sparklers were formerly classified under HTSUS subcategory 3604.10.00. 
The Department has reviewed the current categories and has determined 
that sparklers are currently classified in the above subcategories. 
Although HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs 
purposes, the written description of the merchandise under the order is 
dispositive.

Determination To Revoke

    Pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 
amended (``the Act'') and 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(iii)(B)(3), if no 
domestic interested party files a notice of intent to participate, the 
Department shall, within 90 days after the initiation of the review, 
issue a final determination revoking the order. Because the domestic 
interested parties did not file a notice of intent to participate in 
this sunset review, the Department finds that no domestic interested 
party is participating in this sunset review. Therefore, consistent 
with 19 CFR 351.222(i)(1)(i) and section 751(c)(3)(A) of the Act, we 
are revoking this antidumping duty order. The effective date of 
revocation is December 5, 2010, the fifth anniversary of the date of 
publication in the Federal Register of the most recent notice of 
continuation of this antidumping duty order. See 751(c)(6)(A)(iii) of 
the Act, and 19 CFR 351.222(i)(2)(i).

Effective Date of Revocation

    Pursuant to sections 751(c)(3)(A) and 751(c)(6)(A)(iii) of the Act, 
and 19 CFR 351.222(i)(2)(i), the Department will instruct U.S. Customs 
and Border Protection (``CBP'') to terminate the suspension of 
liquidation of the merchandise subject to this order entered, or 
withdrawn from warehouse, on or after December 5, 2010. The Department 
will issue instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of this 
notice. Entries of subject merchandise prior to the effective date of 
revocation will continue to be subject to suspension of liquidation and 
antidumping duty deposit requirements. The Department will complete any 
pending administrative reviews of this order and will conduct 
administrative reviews of subject merchandise entered prior to the 
effective date of revocation in response to appropriately filed 
requests of review.
    This five-year (sunset) review and notice are published in 
accordance with sections 751(c) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: January 19, 2011.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011-1940 Filed 1-27-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P