Honey From the People's Republic of China: Final Results and Rescission of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Reviews, 4289-4290 [2011-1388]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 25, 2011 / Notices
the last day of the anniversary month of
these orders. We intend to issue the
final results in this review no later than
120 days after publication of the
preliminary results.
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(3)(A)
and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: January 13, 2011.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2011–1394 Filed 1–24–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–489–815]
Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and
Tube From Turkey: Extension of Time
Limit for Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: January 25, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tyler Weinhold or Robert James, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–1121 and (202)
482–0649, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
At the request of interested parties,
the Department of Commerce (the
Department) published in the Federal
Register a notice of initiation of this
antidumping duty administrative
review. See Initiation of Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews and Requests for Revocation in
Part, 75 FR 37759 (June 30, 2010). The
review covers the period May 1, 2009,
through April 30, 2010. The preliminary
results for this administrative review are
currently due no later than January 31,
2011.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Extension of Time Limits for
Preliminary Results
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires
the Department to complete the
preliminary results of an administrative
review within 245 days after the last day
of the anniversary month of an order for
which a review is requested. However,
if it is not practicable to complete the
review within this time period, section
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:40 Jan 24, 2011
Jkt 223001
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the
Department to extend the 245 day time
period for the preliminary results up to
365 days.
The Department has determined it is
not practicable to complete this review
within the statutory time limit because
we require additional time to collect
and analyze information regarding the
terms of sale and certain non-prime
merchandise needed for our preliminary
results. Accordingly, the Department is
extending the time limit for completion
of the preliminary results of this
administrative review until no later than
May 31, 2011, which is 365 days from
the last day of the anniversary month of
these orders. We intend to issue the
final results in this review no later than
120 days after publication of the
preliminary results.
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(3)(A)
and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: January 13, 2011.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2011–1384 Filed 1–24–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–863]
Honey From the People’s Republic of
China: Final Results and Rescission of
Antidumping Duty New Shipper
Reviews
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: January 25, 2011.
SUMMARY: On September 10, 2010, the
Department of Commerce (the
‘‘Department’’) published the
preliminary results of these new shipper
reviews (‘‘NSR’’), for the period of
review (‘‘POR’’) of December 1, 2008,
through November 30, 2009.1 Based on
our analysis of the comments received,
and after reexamining the bona fides of
the sales made by Suzhou Shanding
Honey Product Co., Ltd. (‘‘Suzhou’’) and
Wuhu Fenglian Co., Ltd. (‘‘Fenglian’’),
the Department finds that that sales
under review are not bona fide
transactions; therefore, for these final
results, the Department has rescinded
AGENCY:
1 See Honey From the People’s Republic of China:
Preliminary Intent To Rescind New Shipper
Reviews, 75 FR 55307 (September 10, 2010).
Because the sales under review were made during
the POR, but entered after the POR, the Department
expanded the POR by thirty days.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4289
the review with respect to Suzhou and
Fenglian.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Katie Marksberry and Joshua Startup,
Import Administration, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department
of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–7906 or
(202) 482–5260, respectively.
Background
On September 2, 2010, the
Department placed U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) data on the
record of this review. The Department
published its Preliminary Results on
September 10, 2010. On September 22,
2010, and September 23, 2010,
respectively, Suzhou and Fenglian
submitted comments containing
untimely factual information. On
September 23, 2010, and September 24,
2010, respectively, the Department
removed the untimely submissions from
the record of this review. On September
29, 2010, the Department received
surrogate value comments from the
respondents. On October 1, 2010, the
respondents collectively filed a letter
requesting that the Department issue a
second post-preliminary supplemental
questionnaire. On October 7, 2010, the
Department issued a letter to the
respondents stating that it would not
issue an additional questionnaire. On
November 1, 2010, we received
individually filed case briefs from
Suzhou and Fenglian. On November 9,
2010, we received a single rebuttal brief
from Petitioners.2 We did not receive
any case or rebuttal briefs from any
other interested parties.
Extension of Time Limits
On October 6, 2010, the Department
extended the time limit for these final
results by 90 days to January 31, 2011.3
Scope of the Order
The products covered by the order are
natural honey, artificial honey
containing more than 50 percent natural
honey by weight, preparations of natural
honey containing more than 50 percent
natural honey by weight and flavored
honey. The subject merchandise
includes all grades and colors of honey
whether in liquid, creamed, comb, cut
comb, or chunk form, and whether
packaged for retail or in bulk form.
2 The petitioners are the members of the
American Honey Producers Association and the
Sioux Honey Association (hereinafter referred to as
‘‘Petitioners’’).
3 See Honey From the People’s Republic of China:
Extension of Time Limit for the Final Results for
New Shipper Review, 75 FR 61697 (October 6,
2010).
E:\FR\FM\25JAN1.SGM
25JAN1
4290
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 25, 2011 / Notices
The merchandise subject to the order
is currently classifiable under
subheadings 0409.00.00, 1702.90.90 and
2106.90.99 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States
(‘‘HTSUS’’). Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
Department’s written description of the
merchandise under order is dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the briefs by
parties to these reviews are addressed in
the ‘‘New Shipper Reviews of Honey
from the People’s Republic of China:
Issues and Decision Memorandum,’’
dated January 31, 2010, which is hereby
adopted by this notice (‘‘Issues and
Decision Memo’’). A list of the issues
which parties raised and to which we
respond in the Issues and Decision
Memo is attached to this notice as an
Appendix. The Issues and Decision
Memo is a public document and is on
file in the Central Records Unit (‘‘CRU’’),
main Commerce building, Room 7046,
and is accessible on the Web at https://
www.trade.gov/ia. The paper copy and
electronic version of the memorandum
are identical in content.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
We have made no changes to our
preliminary decision to rescind the
NSRs of Suzhou and Fenglian.
Final Rescission of New Shipper
Reviews
In the Preliminary Results, the
Department preliminarily rescinded the
NSRs for Suzhou and Fenglian, whose
POR sales the Department found to be
non-bona fide.4 The Department
received comments with respect to our
preliminary decision to rescind the
review. For these final results the
Department continues to find the sales
by Suzhou and Fenglian to be non-bona
fide.5
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Cash-Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
18:40 Jan 24, 2011
Jkt 223001
Administrative Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues
to govern business proprietary
information in this segment of the
proceeding. Timely written notification
of the return/destruction of APO
materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and terms of an APO is a violation
which is subject to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing this
determination in accordance with
sections 751(a)(2)(B) and 777(i) of the
Act, and 19 CFR 351.214(h) and
351.221(b)(5).
Dated: January 13, 2011.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
Appendix I
4 See Preliminary Results; see also Memorandum
to the File from Katie Marksberry, International
Trade Specialist, through Catherine Bertrand,
Program Manager, regarding ‘‘Antidumping Duty
New Shipper Review of Honey from the People’s
Republic of China: Bona Fide Analysis of the Sale
Under Review for Suzhou Shanding Honey Product
Co., Ltd.,’’ dated September 2, 2010; see also
Memorandum to the File from Josh Startup,
International Trade Specialist, through Catherine
Bertrand, Program Manager, regarding
‘‘Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review of Honey
from the People’s Republic of China: Bona Fide
Analysis of the Sale Under Review for Wuhu
Fenglian Co., Ltd.,’’ dated September 2, 2010.
5 See Issues and Decision Memorandum at
Comments 3 and 4.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
publication of these final results for all
shipments of subject merchandise from
Suzhou or Fenglian entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication
date, as provided for by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For subject
merchandise produced and exported by
Suzhou or Fenglian, the cash deposit
rate will continue to be the PRC-wide
rate (i.e., $2.63 per kilogram); (2) for
subject merchandise exported by
Suzhou or Fenglian but not
manufactured by Suzhou or Fenglian,
the cash deposit rate will continue to be
the PRC-wide rate (i.e., $2.63 per
kilogram); and (3) for subject
merchandise manufactured by Suzhou
or Fenglian, but exported by any other
party, the cash deposit rate will be the
rate applicable to the exporter. These
cash deposit requirements, when
imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
General Issues
Comment 1: Department’s Treatment of
Respondents’ Post-Preliminary Request
for Additional Supplemental
Questionnaires
Comment 2: Department’s Rejection of
Respondents’ Submission
Comment 3: Accuracy of the CBP Data
Company Specific Issues
Comment 4: Finding that Suzhou’s POR Sale
was Non-Bona Fide
Comment 5: Finding that Fenglian’s Sale was
Non-Bona Fide
[FR Doc. 2011–1388 Filed 1–24–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–928]
Uncovered Innerspring Units From the
People’s Republic of China: Final
Results of First Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On November 10, 2010, the
Department of Commerce (the
‘‘Department’’) published the
Preliminary Results of the first
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on uncovered
innerspring units (‘‘innersprings’’) from
the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’),
covering the period of review (‘‘POR’’)
August 6, 2008, through January 31,
2010.1 The Department received no
comments on the Preliminary Results.
We have made no changes to our margin
calculations for the final results of this
review. The final weighted-average
margins are listed below in the ‘‘Final
Results of the Review’’ section of this
notice.
DATES: Effective Date: January 25, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Toni
Dach, AD/CVD Operations, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–1655.
AGENCY:
Case History
With the issuance of the Preliminary
Results, the Department invited
interested parties to comment on the
Preliminary Results. No interested party
submitted a case brief or comments, or
requested a hearing. Therefore, the
Department has made no changes from
the Preliminary Results for these final
results.
Scope of Order
The merchandise subject to the order
is uncovered innerspring units
composed of a series of individual metal
springs joined together in sizes
corresponding to the sizes of adult
mattresses (e.g., twin, twin long, full,
full long, queen, California king and
king) and units used in smaller
constructions, such as crib and youth
mattresses. All uncovered innerspring
units are included in the scope
1 See Uncovered Innerspring Units From the
People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of
First Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75
FR 69055 (November 10, 2010) (‘‘Preliminary
Results’’).
E:\FR\FM\25JAN1.SGM
25JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 16 (Tuesday, January 25, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4289-4290]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-1388]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-863]
Honey From the People's Republic of China: Final Results and
Rescission of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Reviews
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: January 25, 2011.
SUMMARY: On September 10, 2010, the Department of Commerce (the
``Department'') published the preliminary results of these new shipper
reviews (``NSR''), for the period of review (``POR'') of December 1,
2008, through November 30, 2009.\1\ Based on our analysis of the
comments received, and after reexamining the bona fides of the sales
made by Suzhou Shanding Honey Product Co., Ltd. (``Suzhou'') and Wuhu
Fenglian Co., Ltd. (``Fenglian''), the Department finds that that sales
under review are not bona fide transactions; therefore, for these final
results, the Department has rescinded the review with respect to Suzhou
and Fenglian.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Honey From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary
Intent To Rescind New Shipper Reviews, 75 FR 55307 (September 10,
2010). Because the sales under review were made during the POR, but
entered after the POR, the Department expanded the POR by thirty
days.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Katie Marksberry and Joshua Startup,
Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-7906 or (202) 482-5260,
respectively.
Background
On September 2, 2010, the Department placed U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (``CBP'') data on the record of this review. The Department
published its Preliminary Results on September 10, 2010. On September
22, 2010, and September 23, 2010, respectively, Suzhou and Fenglian
submitted comments containing untimely factual information. On
September 23, 2010, and September 24, 2010, respectively, the
Department removed the untimely submissions from the record of this
review. On September 29, 2010, the Department received surrogate value
comments from the respondents. On October 1, 2010, the respondents
collectively filed a letter requesting that the Department issue a
second post-preliminary supplemental questionnaire. On October 7, 2010,
the Department issued a letter to the respondents stating that it would
not issue an additional questionnaire. On November 1, 2010, we received
individually filed case briefs from Suzhou and Fenglian. On November 9,
2010, we received a single rebuttal brief from Petitioners.\2\ We did
not receive any case or rebuttal briefs from any other interested
parties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The petitioners are the members of the American Honey
Producers Association and the Sioux Honey Association (hereinafter
referred to as ``Petitioners'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Extension of Time Limits
On October 6, 2010, the Department extended the time limit for
these final results by 90 days to January 31, 2011.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Honey From the People's Republic of China: Extension of
Time Limit for the Final Results for New Shipper Review, 75 FR 61697
(October 6, 2010).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The products covered by the order are natural honey, artificial
honey containing more than 50 percent natural honey by weight,
preparations of natural honey containing more than 50 percent natural
honey by weight and flavored honey. The subject merchandise includes
all grades and colors of honey whether in liquid, creamed, comb, cut
comb, or chunk form, and whether packaged for retail or in bulk form.
[[Page 4290]]
The merchandise subject to the order is currently classifiable
under subheadings 0409.00.00, 1702.90.90 and 2106.90.99 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS''). Although
the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the Department's written description of the merchandise under
order is dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the briefs by parties to these reviews are
addressed in the ``New Shipper Reviews of Honey from the People's
Republic of China: Issues and Decision Memorandum,'' dated January 31,
2010, which is hereby adopted by this notice (``Issues and Decision
Memo''). A list of the issues which parties raised and to which we
respond in the Issues and Decision Memo is attached to this notice as
an Appendix. The Issues and Decision Memo is a public document and is
on file in the Central Records Unit (``CRU''), main Commerce building,
Room 7046, and is accessible on the Web at https://www.trade.gov/ia. The
paper copy and electronic version of the memorandum are identical in
content.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
We have made no changes to our preliminary decision to rescind the
NSRs of Suzhou and Fenglian.
Final Rescission of New Shipper Reviews
In the Preliminary Results, the Department preliminarily rescinded
the NSRs for Suzhou and Fenglian, whose POR sales the Department found
to be non-bona fide.\4\ The Department received comments with respect
to our preliminary decision to rescind the review. For these final
results the Department continues to find the sales by Suzhou and
Fenglian to be non-bona fide.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Preliminary Results; see also Memorandum to the File
from Katie Marksberry, International Trade Specialist, through
Catherine Bertrand, Program Manager, regarding ``Antidumping Duty
New Shipper Review of Honey from the People's Republic of China:
Bona Fide Analysis of the Sale Under Review for Suzhou Shanding
Honey Product Co., Ltd.,'' dated September 2, 2010; see also
Memorandum to the File from Josh Startup, International Trade
Specialist, through Catherine Bertrand, Program Manager, regarding
``Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review of Honey from the People's
Republic of China: Bona Fide Analysis of the Sale Under Review for
Wuhu Fenglian Co., Ltd.,'' dated September 2, 2010.
\5\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comments 3 and 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash-Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of these final results for all shipments of subject
merchandise from Suzhou or Fenglian entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as
provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For subject
merchandise produced and exported by Suzhou or Fenglian, the cash
deposit rate will continue to be the PRC-wide rate (i.e., $2.63 per
kilogram); (2) for subject merchandise exported by Suzhou or Fenglian
but not manufactured by Suzhou or Fenglian, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the PRC-wide rate (i.e., $2.63 per kilogram); and (3)
for subject merchandise manufactured by Suzhou or Fenglian, but
exported by any other party, the cash deposit rate will be the rate
applicable to the exporter. These cash deposit requirements, when
imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.
Administrative Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (``APO'') of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues
to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the
proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO
is a violation which is subject to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing this determination in accordance with
sections 751(a)(2)(B) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.214(h) and
351.221(b)(5).
Dated: January 13, 2011.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
Appendix I
General Issues
Comment 1: Department's Treatment of Respondents' Post-Preliminary
Request for Additional Supplemental Questionnaires
Comment 2: Department's Rejection of Respondents' Submission
Comment 3: Accuracy of the CBP Data
Company Specific Issues
Comment 4: Finding that Suzhou's POR Sale was Non-Bona Fide
Comment 5: Finding that Fenglian's Sale was Non-Bona Fide
[FR Doc. 2011-1388 Filed 1-24-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P