Corrosion-Resistant Carbon Steel Flat Products From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, 3613-3614 [2011-1160]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 13 / Thursday, January 20, 2011 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–580–818]
Corrosion-Resistant Carbon Steel Flat
Products From the Republic of Korea:
Final Results of Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On September 14, 2010, the
U.S. Department of Commerce (the
Department) published in the Federal
Register its preliminary results of the
administrative review of the
countervailing duty (CVD) order on
corrosion-resistant carbon steel flat
products (CORE) from the Republic of
Korea (Korea) for the period of review
(POR) January 1, 2008, through
December 31, 2008. See CorrosionResistant Carbon Steel Flat Products
from the Republic of Korea: Preliminary
Results and Partial Rescission of
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Review, 75 FR 55745 (September 14,
2010) (Preliminary Results). We
rescinded the administrative review, in
part, with respect to Dongbu Steel Co.,
Ltd. (Dongbu) and Pohang Iron and
Steel Co., Ltd. (POSCO) and
preliminarily found that Hyundai
HYSCO Ltd. (HYSCO) received de
minimis countervailable subsidies
during the POR. We did not receive any
comments on our Preliminary Results,
however, we have made revisions
regarding two programs as discussed
below.
DATES: Effective Date: January 20, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gayle Longest at (202) 482–3338,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 3, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
Background
On August 17, 1993, the Department
published in the Federal Register the
CVD order on CORE from Korea. See
Countervailing Duty Orders and
Amendments to Final Affirmative
Countervailing Duty Determinations:
Certain Steel Products from Korea,
58 FR 43752 (August 17, 1993). On
September 14, 2010, the Department
published in the Federal Register its
Preliminary Results of the
administrative review of this order for
the period January 1, 2008, through
December 31, 2008. See Preliminary
Results, 75 FR 55745. In accordance
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:24 Jan 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
with 19 CFR 351.213(b), this
administrative review covers HYSCO, a
producer and exporter of subject
merchandise.
In the Preliminary Results, we
indicated that we would request from
the Government of Korea (GOK) a full
translation of the Act on Special
Measures for the Promotion of
Specialized Enterprises for Parts and
Materials. The GOK filed a timely
response on September 17, 2010.
In the Preliminary Results, we invited
interested parties to submit briefs or
request a hearing. Neither the petitioner,
U.S. Steel Corporation, nor the
respondent commented on the
Preliminary Results. Moreover, the
Department did not conduct a hearing
in this review because none was
requested.
Although we received no comments
from interested parties, the Department
has reconsidered its findings regarding
the Act on Special Measures for the
Promotion of Specialized Enterprises for
Parts and Materials program and the Act
on the Promotion of the Development of
Alternative Energy program in these
final results. The revisions to our
calculations and findings concerning
these programs are addressed in the
accompanying Decision Memorandum
for the Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review on CorrosionResistant Carbon Steel Flat Products
From the Republic of Korea (Decision
Memorandum), which is dated
concurrently with and hereby adopted
by this notice. Parties can find a
complete discussion of these revisions
and the corresponding
recommendations in this public
memorandum, which is on file in the
Central Records Unit of the main
commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly
on the World Wide Web at https://
ia.ita.doc.gov/frn.
The paper copy and the electronic
version of the Decision Memorandum
are identical in content.
Scope of Order
Products covered by the order are
CORE from Korea. These products
include flat-rolled carbon steel
products, of rectangular shape, either
clad, plated, or coated with corrosionresistant metals such as zinc, aluminum,
or zinc-, aluminum-, nickel- or ironbased alloys, whether or not corrugated
or painted, varnished or coated with
plastics or other nonmetallic substances
in addition to the metallic coating, in
coils (whether or not in successively
superimposed layers) and of a width of
0.5 inch or greater, or in straight lengths
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3613
which, if of a thickness less than 4.75
millimeters, are of a width of 0.5 inch
or greater and which measures at least
10 times the thickness or if of a
thickness of 4.75 millimeters or more
are of a width which exceeds 150
millimeters and measures at least twice
the thickness. The merchandise subject
to the order is currently classifiable in
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS) at subheadings:
7210.30.0000, 7210.31.0000,
7210.39.0000, 7210.41.0000,
7210.49.0030, 7210.29.0090,
7210.60.0000, 7210.61.0000,
7210.70.6030, 7210.70.6060,
7210.70.6090, 7210.90.1000,
7210.90.6000, 7210.90.9000,
7212.20.0000, 7212.21.0000,
7212.29.0000, 7212.30.1030,
7212.30.1090, 7212.30.3000,
7212.30.5000, 7212.40.1000,
7212.40.5000, 7212.50.0000,
7212.60.0000, 7215.90.1000,
7215.90.3000, 7215.90.5000,
7217.12.1000, 7217.13.1000,
7217.19.1000, 7217.19.5000,
7217.20.1500, 7217.22.5000,
7217.23.5000, 7217.29.1000,
7217.29.5000, 7217.30.15.0000,
7217.32.5000, 7217.33.5000,
7217.39.1000, 7217.39.5000,
7217.90.1000 and 7217.90.5000.
Although the HTSUS subheadings are
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the Department’s written
description of the merchandise subject
to the order is dispositive.
Period of Review
The POR for which we are measuring
subsidies is from January 1, 2008,
through December 31, 2008.
Final Results of Review
As noted above, the Department
received no comments concerning the
Preliminary Results. However, we find
that certain changes are warranted in
these final results. As a result, we have
made adjustments to our calculations as
explained in our Decision
Memorandum. Therefore, in these final
results, we find that HYSCO received a
net subsidy of 0.05 percent ad valorem,
a de minimis rate, during the POR.
Listed below are the programs we
examined in the review and our
findings with respect to each of these
programs. For a complete analysis of the
programs found to be countervailable,
not to confer a benefit during the POR,
not to be countervailable, and not to be
used, see the Preliminary Results.
I. Programs Determined To Confer
Subsidies During the POR
A. Short-Term Export Financing
E:\FR\FM\20JAN1.SGM
20JAN1
3614
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 13 / Thursday, January 20, 2011 / Notices
B. Reduction in Taxes for Operation in
Regional and National Industrial
Complexes
C. GOK’s Direction of Credit for Loans
Issued Prior to 2002
D. R&D Grants and Loans under the Act
on Special Measures for the
Promotion of Specialized Enterprises
for Parts and Materials
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
II. Programs That Provided No Benefits
During the POR
A. Research and Development Grants
Under the Industrial Development Act
(IDA)
B. Energy Savings Fund Program
C. Overseas Resource Development
Program: Loan from Korea Resources
Corporation (KORES)
D. Overseas Resource Development
Program: Loan from Korea National
Oil Corporation (KNOC)
E. Long-Term Loans from the Korean
Development Bank (KDB) Issued in
Years 2002 through 2008
F. Overseas Resource Development
Program: Loan from KEXIM
G. R&D Grants and Loans under the Act
on the Promotion of the Development
of Alternative Energy
III. Programs Found Not To Have Been
Used During the POR
A. Reserve for Research and Manpower
Development Fund Under RSTA
Article 9 (TERCL Article 8)
B. RSTA Article 11: Tax Credit for
Investment in Equipment to
Development Technology and
Manpower (TERCL Article 10)
C. Reserve for Export Loss Under TERCL
Article 16
D. Reserve for Overseas market
Development Under TERCL Article 17
E. Reserve for Export Loss Under TERCL
Article 22
F. Exemption of Corporation Tax on
Dividend Income from Overseas
Resources Development Investment
Under TERCL Article 24
G. Tax Credits for Temporary
Investments Under TERCL Article 27
H. Social Indirect Capital Investment
Reserve Funds Under TERCL Article
28
I. Energy-Servings Facilities Investment
Reserve Funds Under TERCL Article
29
J. Reserve for Investment (Special Cases
of Tax for Balanced Development
Among Areas Under TERCL Articles
41–45
K. Tax Credits for Specific Investments
Under TERCL Article 71
L. Asset Revaluation Under Article 56(2)
of the Tax Reduction and Exemption
Control Act (TERCL)
M. Emergency Load Reduction Program
N. Electricity Discounts Under the
Requested Loan Adjustment Program
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:24 Jan 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
O. Electricity Discounts Under the
Emergency Load Reductions Program
P. Export Industry Facility Loans and
Specialty Facility Loans
Q. Local Tax Exemption on Land
Outside of a Metropolitan Area
R. Short-Term Trade Financing Under
the Aggregate Credit Ceiling Loan
Program Administered by the Bank of
Korea
S. Industrial Base Fund
T. Excessive Duty Drawback
U. Private Capital Inducement Act
V. Scrap Reserve Fund
W. Special Depreciation of Assets on
Foreign Exchange Earnings
X. Export Insurance Rates Provided by
the Korean Export Insurance
Corporation
Y. Loans from the National Agricultural
Cooperation Federation
Z. Tax Incentives from Highly
Advanced Technology Businesses
Under the Foreign Investment and
Foreign Capital Inducement Act
AA. Other Subsidies Related to
Operations at Asan Bay: Provision of
Land and Exemption of Port Fees
Under the Harbor Act
AB. D/A Loans Issued by the Korean
Development Bank and Other
Government-Owned Banks
AC. R&D Grants Under the Promotion of
Industrial Technology Innovation Act
AD. Export Loans by Commercial Banks
Under KEXIM’s Trade Bill
Rediscounting Program
AE. Restriction of Special Taxation Act
(RSTA) Article 94: Equipment
Investment to Promote Worker’s
Welfare
Assessment Rates/Cash Deposits
The Department intends to issue
assessment instructions to U.S. Customs
and Border Protection (CBP) 15 days
after the date of publication of these
final results of review to liquidate
shipments of subject merchandise by
HYSCO entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after
January 1, 2008, through December 31,
2008, without regard to countervailing
duties. We will also instruct CBP not to
collect cash deposits of estimated
countervailing duties on shipments of
the subject merchandise by HYSCO
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the date of
publication of these final results of
review.
For all non-reviewed companies, the
Department has instructed CBP to assess
countervailing duties at the cash deposit
rates in effect at the time of entry, for
entries between January 1, 2008, and
December 31, 2008. The cash deposit
rates for all companies not covered by
this review are not changed by the
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
results of this review, and remain in
effect until further notice.
Return or Destruction of Proprietary
Information
This notice serves as a reminder to
parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of return or
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing these
results in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended.
Dated: January 12, 2011.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011–1160 Filed 1–19–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–588–707]
Granular Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin
From Japan: Final Results of Sunset
Review and Revocation of
Antidumping Duty Order
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On November 1, 2010, the
Department of Commerce (‘‘the
Department’’) initiated the sunset review
of the antidumping duty order on
granular polytetrafluoroethylene resin
(‘‘PTFE resin’’) from Japan. See Initiation
of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 75 FR
67082 (November 1, 2010) (‘‘Initiation
Notice’’). Because the domestic parties
did not participate in this review, the
Department is revoking this
antidumping duty order.
DATES: Effective Date: December 22,
2010.
AGENCY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joseph Shuler, AD/CVD Operations
Office 1, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–1293.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\20JAN1.SGM
20JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 13 (Thursday, January 20, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3613-3614]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-1160]
[[Page 3613]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-580-818]
Corrosion-Resistant Carbon Steel Flat Products From the Republic
of Korea: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On September 14, 2010, the U.S. Department of Commerce (the
Department) published in the Federal Register its preliminary results
of the administrative review of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on
corrosion-resistant carbon steel flat products (CORE) from the Republic
of Korea (Korea) for the period of review (POR) January 1, 2008,
through December 31, 2008. See Corrosion-Resistant Carbon Steel Flat
Products from the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results and Partial
Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 55745
(September 14, 2010) (Preliminary Results). We rescinded the
administrative review, in part, with respect to Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd.
(Dongbu) and Pohang Iron and Steel Co., Ltd. (POSCO) and preliminarily
found that Hyundai HYSCO Ltd. (HYSCO) received de minimis
countervailable subsidies during the POR. We did not receive any
comments on our Preliminary Results, however, we have made revisions
regarding two programs as discussed below.
DATES: Effective Date: January 20, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gayle Longest at (202) 482-3338, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 3, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On August 17, 1993, the Department published in the Federal
Register the CVD order on CORE from Korea. See Countervailing Duty
Orders and Amendments to Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty
Determinations: Certain Steel Products from Korea, 58 FR 43752 (August
17, 1993). On September 14, 2010, the Department published in the
Federal Register its Preliminary Results of the administrative review
of this order for the period January 1, 2008, through December 31,
2008. See Preliminary Results, 75 FR 55745. In accordance with 19 CFR
351.213(b), this administrative review covers HYSCO, a producer and
exporter of subject merchandise.
In the Preliminary Results, we indicated that we would request from
the Government of Korea (GOK) a full translation of the Act on Special
Measures for the Promotion of Specialized Enterprises for Parts and
Materials. The GOK filed a timely response on September 17, 2010.
In the Preliminary Results, we invited interested parties to submit
briefs or request a hearing. Neither the petitioner, U.S. Steel
Corporation, nor the respondent commented on the Preliminary Results.
Moreover, the Department did not conduct a hearing in this review
because none was requested.
Although we received no comments from interested parties, the
Department has reconsidered its findings regarding the Act on Special
Measures for the Promotion of Specialized Enterprises for Parts and
Materials program and the Act on the Promotion of the Development of
Alternative Energy program in these final results. The revisions to our
calculations and findings concerning these programs are addressed in
the accompanying Decision Memorandum for the Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review on Corrosion-Resistant Carbon Steel Flat Products
From the Republic of Korea (Decision Memorandum), which is dated
concurrently with and hereby adopted by this notice. Parties can find a
complete discussion of these revisions and the corresponding
recommendations in this public memorandum, which is on file in the
Central Records Unit of the main commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on
the World Wide Web at https://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn.
The paper copy and the electronic version of the Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Scope of Order
Products covered by the order are CORE from Korea. These products
include flat-rolled carbon steel products, of rectangular shape, either
clad, plated, or coated with corrosion-resistant metals such as zinc,
aluminum, or zinc-, aluminum-, nickel- or iron-based alloys, whether or
not corrugated or painted, varnished or coated with plastics or other
nonmetallic substances in addition to the metallic coating, in coils
(whether or not in successively superimposed layers) and of a width of
0.5 inch or greater, or in straight lengths which, if of a thickness
less than 4.75 millimeters, are of a width of 0.5 inch or greater and
which measures at least 10 times the thickness or if of a thickness of
4.75 millimeters or more are of a width which exceeds 150 millimeters
and measures at least twice the thickness. The merchandise subject to
the order is currently classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule
of the United States (HTSUS) at subheadings: 7210.30.0000,
7210.31.0000, 7210.39.0000, 7210.41.0000, 7210.49.0030, 7210.29.0090,
7210.60.0000, 7210.61.0000, 7210.70.6030, 7210.70.6060, 7210.70.6090,
7210.90.1000, 7210.90.6000, 7210.90.9000, 7212.20.0000, 7212.21.0000,
7212.29.0000, 7212.30.1030, 7212.30.1090, 7212.30.3000, 7212.30.5000,
7212.40.1000, 7212.40.5000, 7212.50.0000, 7212.60.0000, 7215.90.1000,
7215.90.3000, 7215.90.5000, 7217.12.1000, 7217.13.1000, 7217.19.1000,
7217.19.5000, 7217.20.1500, 7217.22.5000, 7217.23.5000, 7217.29.1000,
7217.29.5000, 7217.30.15.0000, 7217.32.5000, 7217.33.5000,
7217.39.1000, 7217.39.5000, 7217.90.1000 and 7217.90.5000. Although the
HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes,
the Department's written description of the merchandise subject to the
order is dispositive.
Period of Review
The POR for which we are measuring subsidies is from January 1,
2008, through December 31, 2008.
Final Results of Review
As noted above, the Department received no comments concerning the
Preliminary Results. However, we find that certain changes are
warranted in these final results. As a result, we have made adjustments
to our calculations as explained in our Decision Memorandum. Therefore,
in these final results, we find that HYSCO received a net subsidy of
0.05 percent ad valorem, a de minimis rate, during the POR.
Listed below are the programs we examined in the review and our
findings with respect to each of these programs. For a complete
analysis of the programs found to be countervailable, not to confer a
benefit during the POR, not to be countervailable, and not to be used,
see the Preliminary Results.
I. Programs Determined To Confer Subsidies During the POR
A. Short-Term Export Financing
[[Page 3614]]
B. Reduction in Taxes for Operation in Regional and National Industrial
Complexes
C. GOK's Direction of Credit for Loans Issued Prior to 2002
D. R&D Grants and Loans under the Act on Special Measures for the
Promotion of Specialized Enterprises for Parts and Materials
II. Programs That Provided No Benefits During the POR
A. Research and Development Grants Under the Industrial Development Act
(IDA)
B. Energy Savings Fund Program
C. Overseas Resource Development Program: Loan from Korea Resources
Corporation (KORES)
D. Overseas Resource Development Program: Loan from Korea National Oil
Corporation (KNOC)
E. Long-Term Loans from the Korean Development Bank (KDB) Issued in
Years 2002 through 2008
F. Overseas Resource Development Program: Loan from KEXIM
G. R&D Grants and Loans under the Act on the Promotion of the
Development of Alternative Energy
III. Programs Found Not To Have Been Used During the POR
A. Reserve for Research and Manpower Development Fund Under RSTA
Article 9 (TERCL Article 8)
B. RSTA Article 11: Tax Credit for Investment in Equipment to
Development Technology and Manpower (TERCL Article 10)
C. Reserve for Export Loss Under TERCL Article 16
D. Reserve for Overseas market Development Under TERCL Article 17
E. Reserve for Export Loss Under TERCL Article 22
F. Exemption of Corporation Tax on Dividend Income from Overseas
Resources Development Investment Under TERCL Article 24
G. Tax Credits for Temporary Investments Under TERCL Article 27
H. Social Indirect Capital Investment Reserve Funds Under TERCL Article
28
I. Energy-Servings Facilities Investment Reserve Funds Under TERCL
Article 29
J. Reserve for Investment (Special Cases of Tax for Balanced
Development Among Areas Under TERCL Articles 41-45
K. Tax Credits for Specific Investments Under TERCL Article 71
L. Asset Revaluation Under Article 56(2) of the Tax Reduction and
Exemption Control Act (TERCL)
M. Emergency Load Reduction Program
N. Electricity Discounts Under the Requested Loan Adjustment Program
O. Electricity Discounts Under the Emergency Load Reductions Program
P. Export Industry Facility Loans and Specialty Facility Loans
Q. Local Tax Exemption on Land Outside of a Metropolitan Area
R. Short-Term Trade Financing Under the Aggregate Credit Ceiling Loan
Program Administered by the Bank of Korea
S. Industrial Base Fund
T. Excessive Duty Drawback
U. Private Capital Inducement Act
V. Scrap Reserve Fund
W. Special Depreciation of Assets on Foreign Exchange Earnings
X. Export Insurance Rates Provided by the Korean Export Insurance
Corporation
Y. Loans from the National Agricultural Cooperation Federation
Z. Tax Incentives from Highly Advanced Technology Businesses Under the
Foreign Investment and Foreign Capital Inducement Act
AA. Other Subsidies Related to Operations at Asan Bay: Provision of
Land and Exemption of Port Fees Under the Harbor Act
AB. D/A Loans Issued by the Korean Development Bank and Other
Government-Owned Banks
AC. R&D Grants Under the Promotion of Industrial Technology Innovation
Act
AD. Export Loans by Commercial Banks Under KEXIM's Trade Bill
Rediscounting Program
AE. Restriction of Special Taxation Act (RSTA) Article 94: Equipment
Investment to Promote Worker's Welfare
Assessment Rates/Cash Deposits
The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 15 days after the date of
publication of these final results of review to liquidate shipments of
subject merchandise by HYSCO entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2008,
without regard to countervailing duties. We will also instruct CBP not
to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties on
shipments of the subject merchandise by HYSCO entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of
these final results of review.
For all non-reviewed companies, the Department has instructed CBP
to assess countervailing duties at the cash deposit rates in effect at
the time of entry, for entries between January 1, 2008, and December
31, 2008. The cash deposit rates for all companies not covered by this
review are not changed by the results of this review, and remain in
effect until further notice.
Return or Destruction of Proprietary Information
This notice serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written
notification of return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to
judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with
the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended.
Dated: January 12, 2011.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011-1160 Filed 1-19-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P