Certain Welded Carbon Steel Pipe and Tube From Turkey: Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 3083-3084 [2011-1053]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 12 / Wednesday, January 19, 2011 / Notices government, business, and the general public. Economic data are the Census Bureau’s primary program commitment during nondecennial census years. The 2012 Economic Census covering the Wholesale Trade sector (as defined by the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS)) will measure the economic activity of more than 450,000 establishments. The information collected will produce basic statistics by kind of business on the number of establishments, sales, payroll, and employment. It will also yield a variety of subject statistics, including sales by product line, sales by class of customer, and other industryspecific measures. Primary strategies for reducing burden in Census Bureau economic data collections are to increase reporting through standardized questionnaires and broader electronic data collection methods. II. Method of Collection Mail Selection Procedures Establishments in the Wholesale Trade sector of the economic census will be selected from the Census Bureau’s Business Register for a mail canvass. To be eligible for selection, an establishment will be required to satisfy the following conditions: (i) It must be classified in the Wholesale Trade sector; (ii) it must be an active operating establishment of a multi-establishment firm (i.e., a firm that operates at more than one physical location), or it must be a single-establishment firm with payroll (i.e., a firm operating at only one physical location); and (iii) it must be located in one of the 50 States or the District of Columbia. Mail selection procedures will distinguish the following groups of establishments: 1. Establishments of MultiEstablishment Firms All active operating establishments of multi-establishment firms will be included in the mail component of the potential respondent universe. We estimate that the 2012 Economic Census mail canvass for the Wholesale Trade sector will include approximately 134,000 establishments of multiestablishment firms. mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES 2. Single-Establishment Firms With Payroll All single-establishment firms having annualized payroll (from Federal administrative records) will be included in the mail component of the potential respondent universe. We estimate that the 2012 Economic Census mail canvass for the Wholesale Trade sector will include approximately 316,000 VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:04 Jan 18, 2011 Jkt 223001 establishments of single-establishment firms. III. Data IV. Request for Comments Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden (including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized and/or included in the request for OMB approval of this information collection; they also will become a matter of public record. Dated: January 12, 2011. Glenna Mickelson, Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer. [FR Doc. 2011–946 Filed 1–18–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–07–P Frm 00009 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–489–501] OMB Control Number: 0607–0929. Form Number: The 42 standard forms and ownership or control flier used to collect information from businesses in this sector of the Economic Census are tailored to specific business practices and are too numerous to list separately in this notice. Type of Review: Regular submission. Affected Public: State or local governments, businesses or other forprofit or non-profit institutions and organizations. Estimated Number of Respondents: 450,000. Estimated Time per Response: 1 hour and 30 minutes. Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 675,000. Estimated Total Annual Cost: $19,581,750. Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory. Legal Authority: Title 13, U.S.C. 131 & 224. PO 00000 3083 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Certain Welded Carbon Steel Pipe and Tube From Turkey: Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Victoria Cho or Dennis McClure, AD/ CVD Operations, Office 3, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Room 4014, 14th Street and Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482–5075 or (202) 482–5973, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Background On June 30, 2010, the U.S. Department of Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) published a notice of initiation of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain welded carbon steel pipe and tube from Turkey covering the period May 1, 2009, through April 30, 2010. See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Requests for Revocation in Part, 75 FR 37759 (June 30, 2010). The preliminary results are currently due no later than January 30, 2011. Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), requires the Department to make a preliminary determination within 245 days after the last day of the anniversary month of an order for which a review is requested. Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act further states that if it is not practicable to complete the review within the time period specified, the administering authority may extend the 245-day period to issue its preliminary results to up to 120 days. We determine that completion of the preliminary results of this review within the 245-day period is not practicable because we have complex technical issues relating to quarterly cost and affiliated parties, which require additional information and analysis for this administrative review. Due to these reasons and in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, we are extending the time period for issuing the preliminary results of the review by 120 days. The preliminary results are now E:\FR\FM\19JAN1.SGM 19JAN1 3084 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 12 / Wednesday, January 19, 2011 / Notices due no later than May 31, 2011. The final results continue to be due 120 days after publication of the preliminary results. This notice is issued and published in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. Dated: January 12, 2011. Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2011–1053 Filed 1–18–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–806] Silicon Metal From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results and Partial Rescission of the 2008–2009 Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On July 15, 2010, the Department of Commerce (‘‘Department’’) published Silicon Metal from the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Preliminary Rescission, in Part, of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 41143 (July 15, 2010) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’). The period of review (‘‘POR’’) is June 1, 2008, through May 31, 2009. The Department received a timely request from Petitioner, Globe Metallurgical Inc. (‘‘Globe’’), in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b), for an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on silicon metal from the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) for three companies: Datong Jinneng Industrial Silicon Co., Ltd. (‘‘Datong Jinneng’’),1 Jiangxi Gangyuan Silicon Industry Co., Ltd. (‘‘Jiangxi Gangyuan’’),2 and Shanghai Jinneng International Trade Co., Ltd. (‘‘Shanghai Jinneng’’). The Department also received a timely request from Shanghai Jinneng and Datong Jinneng (Shanghai Jinneng’s affiliated producer of subject merchandise) for an administrative review of Shanghai Jinneng. On July 29, 2009, the Department published a notice of initiation of an antidumping duty mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES AGENCY: 1 The abbreviation ‘‘Inc.’’ incorrectly appeared after ‘‘Datong Jinneng Industrial Silicon Co.’’ in the Initiation Notice. The abbreviation ‘‘Ltd.’’ should have been used. 2 We have used the abbreviation ‘‘Co.’’ rather than ‘‘Company’’, which was used in the Initiation Notice, because ‘‘Co.’’ is used in the Automated Customs System Module. VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:04 Jan 18, 2011 Jkt 223001 administrative review on silicon metal from the PRC, in which we initiated a review of Datong Jinneng, Jiangxi Gangyuan, and Shanghai Jinneng.3 In the Preliminary Results, the Department preliminarily rescinded this review with respect to Jiangxi Gangyuan and Datong Jinneng 4 because they certified that they had no shipments and we found no indication through our examination of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) data that there were any shipments of subject merchandise by these parties during the POR. The Department has not obtained any evidence to contradict this preliminary finding, and no interested parties commented on the finding. Accordingly, we are rescinding the review with respect to Datong Jinneng and Jiangxi Gangyuan. Consequently, the administrative review covers one respondent, Shanghai Jinneng. We invited interested parties to comment on our Preliminary Results. Based on our analysis of the comments received, we made certain changes to our margin calculation for Shanghai Jinneng. The final dumping margin for this review is listed in the ‘‘Final Results Margins’’ section below. DATES: Effective Date: January 19, 2011. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Demitri Kalogeropoulos or Andrew Medley, AD/CVD Operations, Office 8, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2623 and (202) 482–4987, respectively. Background On July 15, 2010, the Department published its Preliminary Results in the antidumping duty administrative review of silicon metal from the PRC. For the final results, Globe requested a hearing with the Department on August 16, 2010. Shanghai Jinneng and Globe submitted briefs and rebuttal briefs on August 23, 2010, and September 6, 2010, respectively. We returned Globe’s August 23, 2010, case brief because it included untimely filed, new factual information. We allowed Globe to redact the new information and 3 See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Deferral of Administrative Review, 74 FR 37690 (July 29, 2009) (‘‘Initiation Notice’’). 4 Datong Jinneng was Shanghai Jinneng’s affiliated producer of subject merchandise during the POR and is involved in the instant administrative review as such (see Shanghai Jinneng’s Response to Section A (October 16, 2009) at 14). However, we are rescinding the review with respect to Datong Jinneng (as an exporter of subject merchandise), based on its no shipments certification, which we confirmed using CBP data. PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 resubmit. Globe submitted its redacted case brief on September 3, 2010. On October 13, 2010, the Department published a notice extending the deadline for the final results of the 2008–2009 administrative review to January 11, 2011. See Silicon Metal From the People’s Republic of China; Extension of Time Limit for the Final Results of the 2008–2009 Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order, 75 FR 62765 (October 13, 2010). The Department released industry-specific wage rate information on November 18, 2010, and revised data on November 23, 2010. Shanghai Jinneng submitted comments for wage rate issues on November 30, 2010. Globe submitted rebuttal comments for wage rate issues on December 6, 2010. On December 9, 2010, the Department conducted a hearing with interested parties. Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case briefs, rebuttal briefs, and wage rate comments filed by parties in this review are addressed in the Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to, Ronald K. Lorentzen, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, regarding Silicon Metal from the People’s Republic of China: Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2008–2009 Administrative Review, dated concurrently with this notice, (‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum’’), which is hereby adopted by this notice. A list of the issues that parties raised and to which we responded in the Issues and Decision Memorandum follows as an appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file in the Central Records Unit (‘‘CRU’’), Main Commerce Building, Room 7046, and is also accessible on the Web at https:// ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper copy and electronic version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Period of Review The POR is June 1, 2008, through May 31, 2009. Scope of the Order The product covered by the order is silicon metal containing at least 96.00 but less than 99.99 percent of silicon by weight, and silicon metal with a higher aluminum content containing between 89 and 96 percent silicon by weight. The subject merchandise is currently classifiable under item numbers 2804.69.10 and 2804.69.50 of the E:\FR\FM\19JAN1.SGM 19JAN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 12 (Wednesday, January 19, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3083-3084]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-1053]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-489-501]


Certain Welded Carbon Steel Pipe and Tube From Turkey: Extension 
of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Victoria Cho or Dennis McClure, AD/CVD 
Operations, Office 3, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Room 4014, 14th Street and 
Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482-5075 
or (202) 482-5973, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On June 30, 2010, the U.S. Department of Commerce (``the 
Department'') published a notice of initiation of the administrative 
review of the antidumping duty order on certain welded carbon steel 
pipe and tube from Turkey covering the period May 1, 2009, through 
April 30, 2010. See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Reviews and Requests for Revocation in Part, 75 FR 37759 
(June 30, 2010). The preliminary results are currently due no later 
than January 30, 2011.

Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results

    Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the 
Act''), requires the Department to make a preliminary determination 
within 245 days after the last day of the anniversary month of an order 
for which a review is requested. Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act 
further states that if it is not practicable to complete the review 
within the time period specified, the administering authority may 
extend the 245-day period to issue its preliminary results to up to 120 
days.
    We determine that completion of the preliminary results of this 
review within the 245-day period is not practicable because we have 
complex technical issues relating to quarterly cost and affiliated 
parties, which require additional information and analysis for this 
administrative review. Due to these reasons and in accordance with 
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, we are extending the time period for 
issuing the preliminary results of the review by 120 days. The 
preliminary results are now

[[Page 3084]]

due no later than May 31, 2011. The final results continue to be due 
120 days after publication of the preliminary results.
    This notice is issued and published in accordance with section 
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.

    Dated: January 12, 2011.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2011-1053 Filed 1-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.