Petition for Approval of Alternate Odometer Disclosure Requirements, 1367-1375 [2011-148]
Download as PDF
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 6 / Monday, January 10, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
and Review (September 30, 1993), the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
(September 19, 1980, Pub. L. 96–354),
section 1102(b) of the Social Security
Act, section 202 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (March
22, 1995; Pub. L. 104–4), Executive
Order 13132 on Federalism (August 4,
1999) and the Congressional Review Act
(5 U.S.C. 804(2)).
Executive Order 12866 directs
agencies to assess all costs and benefits
of available regulatory alternatives and,
if regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health
and safety effects, distributive impacts,
and equity). A regulatory impact
analysis (RIA) must be prepared for
major rules with economically
significant effects ($100 million or more
in any 1 year). This amendment does
not reach the economic threshold and
thus is not considered a major rule.
The RFA requires agencies to analyze
options for regulatory relief of small
businesses. For purposes of the RFA,
small entities include small businesses,
nonprofit organizations, and small
governmental jurisdictions. Most
hospitals and most other providers and
suppliers are small entities, either by
nonprofit status or by having revenues
of $7.0 million to $34.5 million in any
1 year. Individuals and States are not
included in the definition of a small
entity. We are not preparing an analysis
for the RFA because we have
determined, and the Secretary certifies,
that this amendment will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
In addition, section 1102(b) of the Act
requires us to prepare a regulatory
impact analysis if a rule may have a
significant impact on the operations of
a substantial number of small rural
hospitals. This analysis must conform to
the provisions of section 604 for final
rules of the RFA. For purposes of
section 1102(b) of the Act, we define a
small rural hospital as a hospital that is
located outside of a Metropolitan
Statistical Area for Medicare payment
regulations and has fewer than 100
beds. We are not preparing an analysis
for section 1102(b) of the Act because
we have determined, and the Secretary
certifies, that this amendment will not
have a significant impact on the
operations of a substantial number of
small rural hospitals.
Section 202 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 also
requires that agencies assess anticipated
costs and benefits before issuing any
rule whose mandates require spending
in any 1 year of $100 million in 1995
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:40 Jan 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
dollars, updated annually for inflation.
In 2010, that threshold is approximately
$135 million. This amendment will
have no consequential effect on State,
local, or Tribal governments or on the
private sector.
Executive Order 13132 establishes
certain requirements that an agency
must meet when it promulgates a
proposed rule (and subsequent final
rule) that imposes substantial direct
requirement costs on State and local
governments, preempts State law, or
otherwise has Federalism implications.
Because this amendment does not
impose any costs on State or local
governments, the requirements of
Executive Order 13132 are not
applicable.
In accordance with the provisions of
Executive Order 12866, this amendment
was reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget.
List of Subjects in 42 CFR Part 410
Health facilities, Health professions,
Kidney diseases, Laboratories,
Medicare, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Rural areas, X-rays.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services amends 42 CFR part
410 as set forth below:
PART 410—SUPPLEMENTARY
MEDICAL INSURANCE (SMI)
BENEFITS
1. The authority citation for part 410
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Secs. 1102, 1834, 1871, and
1893 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.
1302, 1395m, 1395hh, and 1395ddd).
Subpart B—Medical and Other Health
Services
§ 410.15
[Amended]
2. Section 410.15 is amended as
follows:
■ A. In paragraph (a), in the definition
of ‘‘First annual wellness visit providing
personalized prevention plan services’’
removing paragraph (ix) and
redesignating paragraph (x) as paragraph
(ix).
■ B. In paragraph (a), in the definition
of ‘‘Subsequent annual wellness visit
providing personalized prevention plan
services’’ removing paragraph (vii) and
redesignating paragraph (viii) as
paragraph (vii).
■ C. In paragraph (a), removing the
definition of ‘‘voluntary advance care
planning’’.
CMS–1503–F2.
■
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program No. 93.773, Medicare—Hospital
Insurance; and Program No. 93.774,
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
1367
Medicare—Supplementary Medical
Insurance Program)
Dated: January 3, 2011.
Donald M. Berwick,
Administrator, Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services.
Approved: January 4, 2011.
Kathleen Sebelius,
Secretary, Department of Health and Human
Services.
[FR Doc. 2011–164 Filed 1–5–11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
49 CFR Part 580
[Docket No. NHTSA–2010–0046; Notice 2]
Petition for Approval of Alternate
Odometer Disclosure Requirements
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.
ACTION: Final Determination.
AGENCY:
The State of Wisconsin has
petitioned for approval of alternate
requirements to certain requirements
under Federal odometer law. NHTSA is
issuing this final determination granting
Wisconsin’s petition as it pertains to
vehicle transfers. This determination
does not include vehicles covered by a
lease agreement.
DATES: Effective Date: February 9, 2011.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov or the street
address listed above. Follow the online
instructions for accessing the dockets.
Anyone is able to search the electronic
form of all comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review DOT’s
complete Privacy Act Statement in the
Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477–78) or you may visit
https://DocketInfo.dot.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Case, Office of the Chief Counsel,
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590
(Telephone: 202–366–2239) (Fax: 202–
366–3820).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Introduction
Federal odometer law, which is
largely based on the Motor Vehicle
E:\FR\FM\10JAR1.SGM
10JAR1
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
1368
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 6 / Monday, January 10, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Information and Cost Savings Act (Cost
Savings Act) 1 and the Truth in Mileage
Act of 1986 2, as amended (TIMA),
contains a number of provisions to limit
odometer fraud and assure that the
purchaser of a motor vehicle knows the
true mileage of the vehicle. The Cost
Savings Act requires the Secretary of
Transportation to promulgate
regulations requiring the transferor
(seller) of a motor vehicle to provide a
written statement of the vehicle’s
mileage registered on the odometer to
the transferee (buyer) in connection
with the transfer of ownership. This
written statement is generally referred to
as the odometer disclosure statement.
Further, under TIMA, vehicle titles
themselves must have a space for the
odometer disclosure statement, and
States are prohibited from licensing
vehicles unless a valid odometer
disclosure statement on the title is
signed and dated by the transferor.
Titles must also be printed by a secure
printing process or other secure process.
TIMA also contains specific disclosure
provisions on transfers of leased
vehicles. Federal law also contains
document retention requirements for
motor vehicle dealers and lessors.
TIMA’s motor vehicle mileage
disclosure requirements apply in a State
unless the State has alternative
requirements approved by the Secretary.
The Secretary has delegated
administration of the odometer program
to NHTSA. A State may petition NHTSA
for approval of such alternate odometer
disclosure requirements.
The State of Wisconsin has petitioned
NHTSA for approval of alternate
odometer disclosure requirements under
TIMA. The Wisconsin Department of
Transportation (WisDOT) proposes a
paperless electronic title transfer
scheme, described more fully in section
IV, similar to the Commonwealth of
Virginia’s alternate odometer disclosure
program, approved by NHTSA on
January 2, 2009. 74 FR 643, 650 (January
7, 2009). Wisconsin’s program will not
apply to, or in lieu, of the provisions of
Federal odometer law related to,
transactions involving at least one outof-State party.3
With limited exceptions, NHTSA
initially determined that Wisconsin’s
proposal satisfied Federal odometer law,
and proposed granting Wisconsin’s
petition on the condition that it amend
its program or demonstrate that it meets
the requirements of Federal law. See 75
1 Public
Law 92–513, 86 Stat. 947, 961 (1972).
Law 99–579, 100 Stat. 3309 (1986).
3 It also does not apply to disclosures by power
of attorney where the title is held by a lien holder
because, in Wisconsin, lienholders do not hold the
vehicle title.
2 Public
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:40 Jan 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
FR 20965 (April 22, 2010). To gain final
approval, Wisconsin was required to
demonstrate that its program conforms
to Federal odometer law disclosure
requirements specifying that an
odometer disclosure statement,
including the brand, be made at the time
of transfer when the seller is
unavailable.4 NHTSA’s Initial
Determination also asked Wisconsin to
address aspects of its e-Odometer
program relating to transfer of leased
vehicles. As addressed below,
Wisconsin will submit a separate
petition regarding transfer of leased
vehicles. After careful consideration of
comments, and the entire record,
NHTSA is granting Wisconsin’s petition
for title transfers other than those
involving a lease agreement. NHTSA’s
analysis is set forth below in Section VI.
II. Statutory Background
NHTSA reviewed the statutory
background of Federal odometer law in
its consideration and approval of
Virginia’s petition for alternate
odometer disclosure requirements. See
73 FR 35617 (June 24, 2008) and 74 FR
643 (January 7, 2009). The statutory
background of the Cost Savings Act and
TIMA, and the purposes behind TIMA,
are discussed at length in NHTSA’s
Final Determination granting Virginia’s
petition. 74 FR 643, 647–48. A brief
summary of the statutory background of
Federal odometer law and the purposes
of TIMA follows.
In 1972, Congress enacted the Cost
Savings Act, among other things, to
prohibit tampering of odometers on
motor vehicles and to establish certain
safeguards for the protection of
purchasers with respect to the sale of
motor vehicles having altered or reset
odometers. See Public Law 92–513,
section 401, 86 Stat. 947, 961–63 (1972).
The Cost Savings Act required that,
under regulations to be published by the
Secretary, the transferor of a motor
vehicle provide a written vehicle
mileage disclosure to the transferee,
prohibited odometer tampering and
provided for enforcement. See Id. at
section 408, 86 Stat. at 947. Section 408
states that the Secretary shall prescribe
rules requiring any transferor of a motor
vehicle to provide a written disclosure
to the transferee that includes the
cumulative mileage on the odometer
and if the odometer reading is known to
be different than the miles the vehicle
has actually traveled, a statement that
the actual mileage is unknown. In
general, the purpose for the disclosure
4 See Section 408 of the Cost Savings Act,
recodified at 49 U.S.C. 32705, and 49 CFR 580.5(c).
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
was to assist purchasers to know the
true mileage of a motor vehicle.
A major shortcoming of the odometer
provisions of the Cost Savings Act was
that they did not require that the
odometer disclosure statement be on the
title. In a number of States, they were
on separate documents that could be
altered easily or discarded and did not
travel with the title. See 74 FR 644.
Consequently, the disclosure statements
did not necessarily deter odometer fraud
employing altered documents,
discarded titles, and title washing. Id.
Congress enacted TIMA in 1986 to
address the Cost Savings Act’s
shortcomings. It amended the Cost
Savings Act to prohibit States from
licensing vehicles after transfers of
ownership unless the new owner
(transferee) submitted a title from the
seller (transferor) containing the seller’s
signed and dated statement of the
vehicle’s mileage, as previously
required by the Cost Savings Act. See
Public Law 99–579, 100 Stat. 3309
(1986); 74 FR 644 (Jan. 7, 2009). TIMA
also prohibits the licensing of vehicles
for use in any State unless the title
issued to the transferee is printed using
a secure printing process or other secure
process, indicates the vehicle mileage at
the time of transfer, and contains
additional space for a subsequent
mileage disclosure by the transferee
when it is sold again. Id. Other
provisions created similar safeguards for
leased vehicles.
TIMA added a provision to the Cost
Savings Act that, with the approval of
the Secretary of Transportation, allows
States to have alternate requirements to
those required under TIMA respecting
the disclosure of mileage. It amended
Section 408 of the Cost Savings Act to
add a new subsection (f), which
provided that the requirements of
subsections (d) and (e)(1) respecting the
disclosure of motor vehicle mileage
when motor vehicles are transferred or
leased shall apply in a State unless the
State has in effect alternate motor
vehicle mileage disclosure requirements
approved by the Secretary. Subsection
(f) provided further that the Secretary
shall approve alternate motor vehicle
mileage disclosure requirements
submitted by a State unless the
Secretary determines that such
requirements are not consistent with the
purpose of the disclosure required by
subsection (d) or (e), as the case may be.
In 1988, Congress amended section
408(d) of the Cost Savings Act to permit
the use of a secure power of attorney in
circumstances where the title was held
by a lienholder. The Secretary was
required to publish a rule to implement
the provision. See Public Law 100–561
E:\FR\FM\10JAR1.SGM
10JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 6 / Monday, January 10, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
section 40, 102 Stat. 2805, 2817 (1988),
which added Section 408(d)(2)(C). In
1990, Congress amended section
408(d)(2)(C) of the Cost Savings Act.
The amendment addressed retention of
powers of attorneys by States and
provided that the rule adopted by the
Secretary not require that a vehicle be
titled in the State in which the power
of attorney was issued. See Public Law
101–641 section 7(a), 104 Stat. 4654,
4657 (1990).
In 1994, in the course of the
recodification of various laws pertaining
to the Department of Transportation, the
Cost Savings Act, as amended, was
repealed, reenacted, and recodified
without substantive change. See Public
Law 103–272, 108 Stat. 745, 1048–1056,
1379, 1387 (1994). The odometer statute
is now codified at 49 U.S.C. 32701 et
seq. In particular, Section 408(a) of the
Cost Savings Act was recodified at 49
U.S.C. 32705(a). Sections 408(d) and (e),
which were added by TIMA (and later
amended), were recodified at 49 U.S.C.
32705(b) and (c). The provisions
pertaining to approval of State alternate
motor vehicle mileage disclosure
requirements were recodified at 49
U.S.C. 32705(d).
III. Statutory Purposes
As discussed above, the Cost Savings
Act, as amended by TIMA in 1986,
states that NHTSA ‘‘shall approve
alternate motor vehicle mileage
disclosure requirements submitted by a
State unless the [NHTSA] determines
that such requirements are not
consistent with the purpose of the
disclosure required by subsection (d) or
(e) as the case may be.’’ (Subsections
408(d), (e) of the Cost Savings Act were
recodified to 49 U.S.C. 32705(b) and
(c)). In light of this provision, we now
turn to our interpretation of the
purposes of these subsections as
germane to Wisconsin’s petition.
Our Final Determination granting
Virginia’s petition for alternate
odometer disclosure requirements
identified the purposes of TIMA
germane to petitions for approval of
odometer disclosure requirements that
did not include disclosures involving
leased vehicles or disclosures by power
of attorney.5 74 FR 643, 647–48 (January
7, 2009). A brief summary of the
purposes identified in the Virginia Final
Determination follows. In the Initial
Determination of Wisconsin’s petition,
5 Since Virginia’s program did not cover
disclosures involving leased vehicles or disclosures
by power of attorney, the purposes of Sections
408(d)(2)(C) and 408(e) of the Cost Savings Act, as
amended, were not germane and were not
addressed in the notice approving the Virginia
program. See 74 FR 647 n. 12.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:40 Jan 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
the Agency identified the purposes of
TIMA relevant to odometer disclosures
for transfer of leased vehicles. 75 FR
20972–73. Since, as explained below,
Wisconsin has indicated that it will
submit a separate petition regarding
transfer of leased vehicles, the purposes
of TIMA relevant to leased vehicles are
not discussed here.
One purpose of TIMA is to assure that
the form of the odometer disclosure
precludes odometer fraud. 74 FR 647.
To prevent odometer fraud facilitated by
disclosure statements that were separate
from titles, TIMA required mileage
disclosures to be on a secure vehicle
title instead of a separate document.
These titles also had to contain space for
the seller’s attested mileage disclosure
and a new disclosure by the purchaser
when the vehicle was sold again. This
discouraged mileage alterations on titles
and limited opportunities for obtaining
new titles with lower mileage than the
actual mileage. Id.
A second purpose of TIMA is to
prevent odometer fraud by processes
and mechanisms making odometer
mileage disclosures on the title a
condition of any application for a title
and a requirement for any title issued by
a State. 74 FR 647. This provision was
intended to eliminate or significantly
reduce abuses associated with lack of
control of the titling process. Id.
Third, TIMA sought to prevent
alterations of disclosures on titles and to
preclude counterfeit titles through
secure processes. 74 FR 648. In
furtherance of these purposes, paper
titles (incorporating the disclosure
statement) must be produced using a
secure printing process or protected by
‘‘other secure process.’’ 6 Id.
A fourth purpose is to create a record
of vehicle mileage and a paper trail. 74
FR 648. The underlying purposes of this
record and paper trail were to better
inform consumers and provide
mechanisms for tracing odometer
tampering and prosecuting violators.
TIMA’s requirement that new
applications for titles include signed
mileage disclosure statements on the
titles from the prior owners creates a
permanent record that is easily checked
by subsequent owners or law
6 Congress intended to encourage new
technologies by including the language ‘‘other
secure process.’’ The House Report accompanying
TIMA noted that ‘‘ ‘other secure process’ is intended
to describe means other than printing which could
securely provide for the storage and transmittal of
title and mileage information.’’ H.R. Rep. No. 99–
833, at 33 (1986). ‘‘In adopting this language, the
Committee intends to encourage new technologies
which will provide increased levels of security for
titles.’’ Id. See also Cost Savings Act, as amended
by TIMA, section 408(d), recodified at 49 U.S.C.
32705(b).
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
1369
enforcement officials. This record
provides critical snapshots of vehicle
mileage at every transfer, which are the
fundamental links of this paper trail.
Finally, the general purpose of TIMA
is to protect consumers by assuring that
they receive valid representations of the
vehicle’s actual mileage at the time of
transfer based on odometer disclosures.
74 FR 648.
IV. The Wisconsin Program
As explained in NHTSA’s Initial
Determination, Wisconsin petitions for
approval of alternate odometer
disclosure requirements. 75 FR 20965,
20967 (Apr. 22, 2010). Wisconsin
requests alternate disclosure
requirements for motor vehicle private
party (including motor vehicle dealers)
transfers, including transactions
involving a lienholder.7 Wisconsin’s
petition included a request for alternate
odometer disclosure requirements for
transactions involving leased vehicles
but, as explained below, Wisconsin
states that it will submit a separate
petition addressing electronic odometer
disclosure for leased vehicle transfers.
Recent Wisconsin legislation
establishes that the title, title
application, and other specified
information maintained by the DMV in
its database are the original and
controlling title records for a vehicle.
See Wis. Stat. Ann. § 342.01(2)(ac) and
§ 342.09(4) (2009). Wisconsin proposes
creating an electronic odometer
statement (e-Odometer) residing in the
WisDOT Department of Motor Vehicles
(DMV) database as the official odometer
statement. Under the proposal, a
distinct e-Odometer system will be
created to accept and maintain eOdometer statements as stand-alone
electronic records, separate from an
electronic title. E-Odometer statements
will be linked to, and become part of the
title record in the DMV database. The
DMV’s titling system will automatically
link the e-Odometer statements to a
vehicle’s title whenever an electronic
title transaction occurs, and a title
transfer could not be completed unless
proper odometer disclosure is entered in
the e-Odometer record. According to
Wisconsin’s petition, if a paper title is
needed, the DMV will print it on secure
paper with the odometer disclosure
7 Under Wisconsin law, a lienholder does not
physically possess the title to the vehicle; the title
remains with the vehicle owner. Thus, Wisconsin
does not permit odometer disclosure by power of
attorney when title is held by a lienholder and does
not petition for alternate requirements regarding
odometer disclosure by power of attorney.
Wisconsin does accept a written odometer
disclosure by power of attorney from an out-of-state
party that registers the vehicle in Wisconsin.
E:\FR\FM\10JAR1.SGM
10JAR1
1370
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 6 / Monday, January 10, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
statement in the proper location and
format.
Wisconsin’s original petition
encompassed transfers of leased
vehicles. In the Initial Determination,
NHTSA raised questions about this
aspect of Wisconsin’s program. In its
comments on that Determination,
Wisconsin stated that lessee odometer
disclosure would be addressed in the
second implementation phase, and that
the State would consult with NHTSA.
Wisconsin asked that NHTSA approve
its petition with the understanding that
Wisconsin would consult with NHTSA
to satisfy all requirements. If NHTSA is
unable to approve the State’s petition
with that provision, the State requested
approval of the petition except for the
lessor/lessee transaction process. The
State would expect to file a separate
petition for approval of the lessor/lessee
transaction in the future. NHTSA cannot
approve a petition or part of a petition
on the basis of future consultations. As
a result, NHTSA is unable to grant
Wisconsin’s petition as it pertains to
transfers of vehicles involving a lease
agreement. This is without prejudice for
Wisconsin to develop e-Odometer
provisions for the transfer of leased
vehicles in a future phase of its
implementation plan and to petition
NHTSA for approval of electronic leased
vehicle odometer disclosure in the
future. We will not discuss Wisconsin’s
proposal for leased vehicles below.
A. Overview of Wisconsin’s Electronic
Titling System
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
Wisconsin has implemented a titling
system that permits individuals,
organizations and businesses
(collectively, DMV Customers) to
process vehicle title transactions
electronically through its automated
processing partnership system (APPS)
program. See Wis. Admin. Code § Trans
1565.01. Under APPS, a vendor 8
approved by the DMV 9 creates a
computer system to link or interface
DMV customers with the DMV database.
The link permits the DMV customer to
8 According to Wisconsin’s petition, a ‘‘vendor’’ is
a person, business or organization that contracts
with the DMV to provide a host computer system
by which agents may obtain access to specified
information services. Wis. Admin. Code § Trans
156.02(8). An approved vendor must work with
Wisconsin’s DMV to develop an automated
interface software application that meets the
automated interface specifications prescribed by
DMV. Wis. Admin. Code § Trans 156.03(4).
9 In order to become an approved vendor, an
entity must submit an application with certain
information to DMV, submit an approved
implementation plan, work with DMV to meet the
automated interface specifications prescribed by
DMV and execute a contract with DMV.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:40 Jan 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
access the DMV database and conduct
authorized title transactions.
In order to gain direct access to the
DMV’s database under the vendor
system, a DMV customer must enter into
an agreement with an approved vendor,
obtain DMV approval to process title
transactions, and enter into a contract
with the DMV. To maintain system
security and integrity, employees of
DMV customers using the interface will
have to submit a signed affidavit to the
DMV before accessing the system. Once
the DMV customer complies with these
requirements, the DMV customer will be
able to perform authorized title
transactions directly within the DMV’s
system.
Currently, Wisconsin requires motor
vehicle dealers to electronically process
title transactions for vehicles that they
sell. See Wis. Stat. Ann. § 342.16(1)(a)
and (am) (2009); Wis. Admin. Code
§ Trans 141.01. Motor vehicle dealers
can perform electronic titling
transactions through APPS or through
an Internet-based interface with the
DMV, known as e-MV11. In order to
process title transactions using the eMV11, a DMV customer must apply to
the DMV by submitting an application
setting forth the name, address and
contact of the entity and providing the
names and access authority of
employees performing title transactions.
After setting up the required security
protocols, the DMV customer can enter
the appropriate title transaction.10 Also,
under Wisconsin’s electronic titling
program, motor vehicle dealers are
required to maintain and keep their title
transactions records, including
odometer disclosure statements, for five
years. See Wis. Admin. Code § Trans
141.08(2).
According to Wisconsin’s petition, the
electronic titling program will be
expanded to include other persons,
businesses, and organizations. These
businesses and organizations, such as
10 According to Wisconsin’s petition, authorized
transactions for amending an electronic odometer
record are or will be:
1. Dealer sales to private buyers, including
purchases and trade-ins from private buyers;
2. Dealer reassignments to other dealers;
3. Consignor statement when consigning a vehicle
for sale;
4. Dealer or auction purchase of out-of-state
vehicle and subsequent sale of vehicle with
Wisconsin title (Wisconsin could produce a secure
paper title for use by the other State.);
5. DMV odometer corrections on title;
6. Involuntary liens from towing/storage,
landlord, or mechanic;
7. Repossessions;
8. Private sales where title is processed by DMV
agent or financial institution;
9. Lessee to lessor statement upon relinquishing
a leased vehicle; and
10. Private sales using e-MVPublic.
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
lienholders or auction companies, will
conduct electronic title transactions
through APPS. Individuals conducting
private sales of unencumbered vehicles
will eventually have the ability to
perform title transfer and odometer
disclosure through an Internet-based
application called e-MVPublic.
B. Wisconsin’s e-Odometer Program
Wisconsin asserts that e-Odometer
entries will provide a virtual
replacement of existing secure paper
odometer disclosure statements for
vehicle transactions. Under Wisconsin’s
proposal, the e-Odometer system will be
a unique electronic application within
Wisconsin’s electronic title transfer
system. Although the e-Odometer entry
will be a stand-alone secure electronic
record, it will be safely and securely
electronically linked to the electronic
title record of the vehicle by the vehicle
identification number (VIN) and become
part of the vehicle title. Title transfer
could not occur unless the transferor
and transferee, or other authorized
persons such as dealer employees,
perform the required disclosure and
acceptance through the e-Odometer
system. Once the odometer disclosure
and acceptance is completed, the
statement is stored in the e-Odometer
system and linked to the electronic title
record by the VIN.
The petition states that the following
information will be stored in the secure
e-Odometer record:
1. VIN;
2. Description of the vehicle by make,
model, model year and body type;
3. Odometer reading and date of the
reading;
4. The Brand (actual, not actual or
exceeds limits of odometer);
5. Name, address of person disclosing
odometer reading (must match the
transferor);
6. Name, address of person accepting
odometer reading (must match the
transferee); and
7. Statement reference to Federal law
requirement and potential penalties.
Some of the e-Odometer information
and other vehicle information will be
available to DMV personnel through a
DMV vehicle inquiry function, while
limited information will be available to
the public through a public inquiry
function. The information available to
DMV personnel includes:
1. Vehicle description;
2. Title owner information;
3. Brands, if any;
4. Most current odometer reading,
status and date recorded;
5. Odometer reading, status and
record date history;
6. Lien information; and
E:\FR\FM\10JAR1.SGM
10JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 6 / Monday, January 10, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
7. Owner in possession of the vehicle.
The publicly available information
includes:
1. Vehicle description;
2. Most current odometer reading,
status and date recorded;
3. Brands, if any; and
4. Lien information.
Wisconsin’s petition states that
creation of or amendments to
e-Odometer records will be possible
only when titles are transferred in the
course of authorized transactions by
authorized persons.
C. Wisconsin e-Odometer
Implementation Schedule
Wisconsin plans to implement its eOdometer program in three phases.
Because motor vehicle dealers are
already required to complete title
transactions electronically, Wisconsin
intends to begin the e-Odometer
program with these dealers. See Wis.
Stat. Ann. § 342.16(1)(a) and (am)
(2009); Wis. Admin. Code § Trans
141.01. The second phase will
implement e-Odometer in title transfers
involving lienholders, motor vehicle
auctions, and vehicle repossessions. The
final phase will implement e-Odometer
in transfers of unencumbered motor
vehicles between private individuals.
Phase two and three are still under
development and Wisconsin has not
provided an estimated implementation
schedule. According to the petition,
during phase-in, some odometer
disclosure transactions will be
electronic but some will continue to be
on the secure paper title and secure
paper odometer statement.
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
1. Phase One: e-Odometer in Dealer
Transactions
Wisconsin’s petition states
e-Odometer will apply first to motor
vehicle transfers through motor vehicle
dealers. During this phase, eligible title
transactions include reassignments
among dealers, consignments, and retail
sales. In order to complete a transaction,
there must be an odometer disclosure
and acceptance of the odometer
statement. The odometer disclosure and
acceptance will be permitted between
the following persons: (1) Authorized
dealer personnel and an individual
buyer; (2) an individual seller trading in
a vehicle and authorized dealer
personnel; (3) authorized dealer
personnel in the case of dealer
reassignments; and (4) an individual
vehicle owner and an authorized person
on behalf of a consignee in the case of
vehicle consignment. According to
Wisconsin, the identities of all persons
involved will be verified and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:40 Jan 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
authenticated through the DMV’s
processes.
Under Wisconsin’s plan, dealer title
transfer transactions will be completed
through an APPS’s vendor interface
application or the e-MV11 Internetbased application. During these title
transfer transactions, e-Odometer forms
will be imported into the transaction
and completed by the authorized
persons.
2. Phase 2: e-Odometer in Title
Transactions between Private Parties
Involving Lienholders and Other
Commercial Entities
Wisconsin’s petition states that the
second phase will incorporate
e-Odometer procedures into title
transfers in a number of circumstances,
including between private parties when
there is a lien on the vehicle. These title
transactions will be processed by the
financial institution holding the lien.
During this phase, e-Odometer will be
available to the financial institution
through the APPS application or an
application WisDOT develops for these
lenders. Because lienholders do not
possess titles under Wisconsin law, a
satisfied lienholder will access
e-Odometer to electronically release the
lien to allow production of a clear title.
To facilitate this process, e-Odometer
forms will be available to buyers and
sellers through an Internet application
allowing completion of the required
odometer disclosures and acceptances.
During this second phase, Wisconsin
also plans to incorporate use of the eOdometer system into title transfers
involving motor vehicle auctions,
involuntary vehicle transfers (i.e.
involuntary liens and repossessions),
corrections to odometer information on
titles, and other transactions involving
secure odometer statements.
3. Phase 3: e-Odometer in Private Sales
The last phase of Wisconsin’s
program will incorporate e-Odometer
entries into private sales of
unencumbered vehicles. The title
transfer will be conducted through an
on-line application called
e-MVPublic.11 For private transfers of
motor vehicles, odometer disclosure and
acceptance will be accomplished by the
seller and buyer through e-MVPublic
once their identities are verified by
DMV processes.
11 For individuals without Internet access,
Wisconsin is considering providing access to
e-MVPublic at its DMV service centers. At a
minimum, Wisconsin states that public libraries
offer public access to computers and the Internet,
which will enable individuals without Internet to
use e-Odometer.
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
1371
D. Identity Verification Under
Wisconsin e-Odometer
Wisconsin’s petition describes two
verification processes whose operation
differs depending on whether the user is
a DMV partner or regular customer
(such as a dealer or financial institution)
or an intermittent user. For a DMV
partner or regular customer, the first
step is being approved by the DMV to
access its database. As part of the
approval process, the entity must
provide the legal business name and
address of the business. After approval,
identity verification procedures will
require these users to enter into an
agreement with the DMV that includes
security procedures—including
establishing an account and secure
logon ID. The users are identified and
authenticated through a unique ‘‘user
ID’’ and password that are traced to a
particular person on the account.
Vendors will manage the verification
process. The Wisconsin APPS program
requires approved vendors to design
precise electronic security and audit
trail procedures into its interface, which
DMV will then verify. This interface
requires three administrative steps to
identify, authenticate, and authorize
users of the DMV’s database. First,
vendors must create an audit journal to
identify the individual responsible for
each transaction. Vendors assign each
user a ‘‘user ID’’ that can be traced to the
individual user. Next, to authenticate
the user, a password known only to the
user that is associated with the ‘‘user ID’’
is entered before a transaction is
allowed. If an individual user is not
authorized by the vendor for the type of
transaction requested, the system will
immediately terminate the transaction.
Last, vendors must authorize the user to
access the appropriate information. In
addition to the identification protocols,
vendors must create and maintain
access logs that can be used for auditing
and recording keeping, which include,
among other things, a history of each
customer transaction.
Under Wisconsin’s plan, DMV
partners and regular customers must
submit the identity of each employee
who will conduct title transactions and
specify each employee’s authority to
perform transactions in the DMV’s
database. Prior to obtaining
authorization from the DMV to conduct
title transfer transactions, each
employee must submit a signed affidavit
acknowledging security procedures and
safeguards. The DMV must confirm each
user’s authorization before the user can
process title transactions.
For individuals who are not DMV
partners or regular customers,
E:\FR\FM\10JAR1.SGM
10JAR1
1372
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 6 / Monday, January 10, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Wisconsin will require individuals to
establish an electronic signature that
can uniquely identify the person.
Identity verification begins with the
customer entering a minimum of three
personal identifiers for the correct
customer record in the DMV database.
Personal identifiers include name,
address, date of birth, product number,
Driver License/ID number, and a
Federal Employer Identification Number
or partial Social Security Number
(possibly the last four or five digits).12
After the user inputs the personal
identifiers into the system, the system
will check DMV customer records and
verify that the user is the correct
individual or business, and will
authorize the customer to update the
odometer statement. Once the user is
verified, the user can begin the title
transaction.
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
E. Odometer Disclosure Under
Wisconsin e-Odometer
Wisconsin’s petition states that two
parties must engage in an authorized
e-Odometer transaction to effectuate the
odometer disclosure. In order to
conduct the e-Odometer disclosure,
each party will access the DMV database
by providing information to satisfy the
identity verification requirements of the
system and the VIN of the vehicle.
Under Wisconsin’s proposal, a
transferor must disclose the odometer
reading and brand (actual/not actual/
exceeding odometer limits) and the
transferee must accept the odometer
reading to allow the transaction to go
forward.13 The e-Odometer transaction
12 Wisconsin prohibits nonresidents from
applying for a Wisconsin title, except in certain
limited exceptions. See Wis. Admin. Code § Trans
154.13(2). A nonresident who is eligible to apply for
a Wisconsin title will not be considered a DMV
partner or regular customer. These nonresidents
will be subject to the e-Odometer requirements as
long as the vehicle is titled and transferred within
Wisconsin.
13 Wisconsin states that there are a limited
number of exceptions under Wisconsin law and
e-Odometer to the requirement for two parties to
engage in a transaction to update a title. One
exception is involuntary transfer of the vehicle
through repossession by a financial institution in
which the title is issued to the financial institution.
This exception is permissible under Federal
odometer law because repossession is not a transfer
of ownership and does not require an odometer
disclosure statement. See 49 CFR 580.3. Another
exception is when the seller is not available. If the
seller is not available, the DMV database permits
the transferee to state the odometer reading with a
brand of ‘‘not actual.’’ If the transferor becomes
available to make the disclosure, DMV will change
the recorded status to ‘‘actual.’’ This exception does
not conform to Federal odometer law, which
requires an odometer disclosure statement,
including the brand, at the time of transfer of
ownership. 49 U.S.C. 32705(a)(1); 49 CFR 580.5(a).
Federal odometer law does not permit subsequent
alterations to the brand as contemplated by
Wisconsin. NHTSA believes that permitting such an
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:40 Jan 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
will remain in a pending status between
the transferor and transferee until each
party completes the required actions,
e.g., disclosure by the seller and
acceptance by the buyer. Once both
actions have been accomplished, the
e-Odometer record will be secured
within DMV’s database and become part
of the electronic title through the VIN.
To clarify the e-Odometer procedure,
Wisconsin provides an exemplar title
transaction involving a dealer trade-in.
In a vehicle trade-in transaction, the
customer (transferor) must bring the
paper title to the dealer (transferee) at
the time of the transfer. After entering
all the required data in the Wisconsin
electronic title system and initiating the
e-Odometer process, the dealer will then
destroy the paper title.14 Under the
e-Odometer process, the customer
discloses the odometer reading (and
brand) and the dealer accepts the
odometer reading. The vehicle’s
odometer reading is then stored in the
DMV database and linked virtually to
the vehicle’s title through the VIN.
Upon later sale of the trade-in vehicle,
the dealer (as the transferor) must
disclose the odometer reading (and
brand) and the vehicle buyer (as the
transferee) must accept the odometer
reading. The dealer and buyer will
access e-Odometer at the time of the sale
to complete the disclosure and
acceptance of the odometer statement,
which upon acceptance by the buyer
secures the odometer statement in the
DMV’s database. After the sale of the
vehicle is completed, the dealer
completes title processing in APPS or
e-MV11 by titling the vehicle in the
consumer’s name, verifying that secure
odometer disclosure has been
completed. After titling is complete, the
updated e-Odometer entry becomes part
of the title record. For in-State
transactions, a paper title is issued only
upon request.
F. Wisconsin’s Position on Meeting the
Purposes of TIMA
Wisconsin has maintained that its eOdometer program meets the purposes
of TIMA, as described by NHTSA in its
Final Determination on the
Commonwealth of Virginia’s petition for
alternate odometer disclosure
requirements. See 74 FR 643, 647–48
(January 7, 2009).
Wisconsin’s petition states that eOdometer is part of the vehicle’s title.
Under e-Odometer, the VIN links the
exception could create a loophole that will be
abused.
14 According to Wisconsin, the dealer’s failure to
destroy the title subjects the dealer to civil penalties
and other sanctions, such as license suspension or
removal.
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
odometer statement to the title record.
The system automatically imports
e-Odometer into the title transfer
transaction process conducted by the
transferor and transferee. A title
transaction cannot occur unless the
odometer disclosure statement is made
and accepted. The e-Odometer
information is then secured, stored, and
becomes visible through the vehicle’s
electronic title record.
According to the petition, other
system requirements provide a
significant level of security for the
e-Odometer system. First, title transfer
cannot occur unless the authorized
persons update e-Odometer entries.
Second, only those persons authorized
to make title transfer transactions (e.g.,
authorized dealer personnel or
authenticated private owners) are able
to make e-Odometer statements. Third,
odometer disclosure under the
e-Odometer system is only permitted
when a title is transferred.15 If a title is
required to be printed on a secure title
paper, the DMV system will
automatically include the odometer
disclosure information on the printed
title. If a title on secure title paper is
used in a vehicle transfer, the odometer
information shown on the secure paper
title will be entered into the e-Odometer
electronic record during the title
transfer transaction process and the
paper title will be destroyed.
Wisconsin’s petition also states that
odometer disclosure is a required data
input for application for a title and a
required output on the title. According
to the petition, the odometer disclosure
and acceptance is a required input to an
electronic title transaction, whether
performed through APPS or e-MV11.
Although APPS permits odometer
disclosure and acceptance at different
times, e-Odometer secures the
disclosure and acceptance and stores it
electronically until the odometer
disclosure is imported during title
processing.
Wisconsin’s petition asserts that eOdometer provides a level of security
against altering, tampering, and
counterfeiting equivalent to the
odometer statement on a secure paper
title. According to Wisconsin, the eOdometer statement is secured in the
DMV database as soon as the transferor
electronically discloses and the
transferee accepts the odometer reading.
After the transferee accepts the
odometer disclosure, e-Odometer stores
that mileage disclosure, the date, and
the names and addresses of the
15 As noted above, there are some exceptions
under Wisconsin law.
E:\FR\FM\10JAR1.SGM
10JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 6 / Monday, January 10, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
transferor and transferee, and will not
allow any changes to that entry.
Finally, Wisconsin’s petition
contends that the authentication and
verification of the transferor’s and
transferee’s electronic signatures are
readily detectable and reliably traced to
the particular individual. Wisconsin
states that the DMV has established
extensive security procedures for
vendors who process vehicle
transactions on behalf of the DMV and
regularly interact with the DMV, and for
individuals and intermittent business
customers who wish to make entries in
DMV records. Wisconsin’s security
procedures are governed under
Wisconsin statutes, administrative rules,
contracts, DMV policy and procedure,
and electronic security protocols. DMV
Partners and regular business customers
will access the e-Odometer system
through secure applications that are
already in use for vehicle title
transactions. Individuals and
intermittent business customers will
access the e-Odometer system through a
secure Internet application. Both
applications require information, such
as electronic signatures, that can
authenticate and verify the users’
identity.
V. Summary of Public Comments
NHTSA received comments from two
entities: (1) WisDOT; and (2) the
American Automotive Leasing
Association (AALA). The AALA
comments are discussed in section VI
below.
WisDOT’s comments responded to
NHTSA requirements in the Agency’s
Initial Determination that Wisconsin (1)
conform its program to the requirements
of Federal odometer law by not
permitting the alteration of the brand on
an electronic odometer statement when
the seller of the vehicle is unavailable
at the time of the transfer, or fully
explains how this exception complies
with the law and its purposes; (2)
permit lessors to retain each odometer
disclosure statement they give and
receive; and (3) clarify the system’s
ability to allow lessors to place a
different brand on the disclosure
statement in those instances where the
lessor believes, or has reason to believe,
that the statement provided by the
lessee is inaccurate. WisDOT submitted
comments indicating that it will manage
e-odometer disclosure when a seller is
unavailable by requiring the buyer to
give the odometer reading with a brand
of ‘‘not actual,’’ and specifying that the
‘‘not actual’’ brand cannot be changed,
even if the seller appears later.
While Wisconsin will seek approval
of alternate odometer disclosure
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:40 Jan 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
requirements for leased vehicle transfers
at a later date, its comments addressed
NHTSA’s concerns about these
transfers. Wisconsin indicated that it
will create a mandatory system for
lessors to retain all odometer statements
they receive for the five-year period
required by Federal regulations, 49 CFR
580.8(b). Wisconsin also indicated that
it will build e-Odometer to facilitate
odometer statements by lessors if the
lessor believes, or has reason to believe,
that the lessee’s disclosure does not
reflect the actual mileage of the vehicle.
VI. NHTSA’s Final Determination
In this part, NHTSA considers the
Wisconsin program in light of the
purposes of the disclosure required by
subsection (d) of section 408 of the Cost
Savings Act.16 We also respond to
comments.
Under the Cost Savings Act, as
amended by TIMA, the standard is that
NHTSA ‘‘shall’’ approve alternate motor
vehicle mileage disclosure requirements
submitted by a State unless NHTSA
determines that such requirements are
not consistent with the purpose of the
disclosure required by subsection (d) or
(e) as the case may be. The purposes are
discussed above, as is the Wisconsin
alternate program.
As explained above, one purpose of
the disclosures under section 408(d) and
(e) of the Cost Savings Act is to assure
that the form of the odometer disclosure
precludes odometer fraud. NHTSA has
determined that Wisconsin’s alternate
electronic odometer disclosure
requirements satisfy this purpose.
Under Wisconsin’s program, the
vehicle’s odometer reading must be
entered in the course of the title transfer
transaction for transfer of title to occur.
The reading is disclosed by the
transferor and, if valid, accepted by the
transferee. Thereafter the odometer
disclosure statement will reside as an
electronic record in the DMV database
and will be linked to the vehicle’s title
by the VIN. This electronic odometer
disclosure is a required element of the
transfer and part of the title record in
the DMV database. If a hard copy of the
title is needed, Wisconsin generates a
title with the odometer disclosure
statement on the title using a secure
printing process. Wisconsin’s system
will, therefore, have the odometer
disclosure as part of the vehicle title as
16 Since Wisconsin’s program does not cover
disclosures by power of attorney or transfers
involving leased vehicles, the purposes of sections
408(d)(1)(c) and (e) of the Cost Savings Act as
amended by TIMA are not germane. Thus,
Wisconsin continues to be subject to all Federal
requirements that are not based on sections
408(d)(1)(A), (B), and (2).
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
1373
required by TIMA. Also, Wisconsin’s
electronic title and odometer system
provides an electronic equivalent to
TIMA’s requirement that the title
contain a space for the transferor to
disclose the vehicle’s mileage. For
conventional paper transactions in
Wisconsin, hard copies of electronic
titles will continue to provide a separate
space for owners to execute a proper
odometer disclosure in keeping with
TIMA and current practice.17
Another purpose of TIMA is to
prevent odometer fraud by processes
and mechanisms making the disclosure
of an odometer mileage on the title a
condition for the application for a title
and a requirement for the title issued by
the State. NHTSA has determined that
Wisconsin’s title transfer process
satisfies this purpose by requiring
disclosure and acceptance of odometer
information before the transaction can
be completed. If the transaction is
successful, the DMV’s system will create
or amend an electronic title and store
the linked electronic odometer
statement. A new title will not be issued
without entry and acceptance of the
odometer disclosure. Our Initial
Determination raised a question about
alteration of the brand. Wisconsin
indicated in its petition that, if the seller
is not available at the time of transfer of
ownership, the DMV database permits
the transferee to state the odometer
reading with a brand of ‘‘not actual.’’ If
the transferor later becomes available to
make the disclosure and does so, DMV
would change the recorded status to
‘‘actual.’’ In the Initial Determination,
NHTSA stated that a change to the title
subsequent to transfer of the vehicle
does not conform to Federal odometer
law, which requires an odometer
disclosure statement, including the
brand, to be made at the time of transfer.
75 FR 20965, 20971 (April 22, 2010)
(citing 49 U.S.C. 32705(a)(1); 49 CFR
580.5(a)). Wisconsin’s comments to our
Initial Determination indicate that
Wisconsin’s program will not permit a
post-transfer change of the brand.
Wisconsin allows the buyer to give the
odometer reading a brand of ‘‘not actual’’
where not properly completed by the
seller, and this brand cannot be
changed, even if the seller appears later.
The Agency notes that a transferor and/
or transferee cannot incorporate a ‘‘not
actual’’ brand to the odometer disclosure
statement as a matter of course or
convenience, but only if the mileage
17 Wisconsin notes that paper titles will be
produced for title transfer transactions that involve
out-of-state parties, such as a vehicle sale to an outof-state dealer or retail purchaser, an auction sale
to an out-of-state dealer or a retail consumer in
Wisconsin that requests a paper title.
E:\FR\FM\10JAR1.SGM
10JAR1
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
1374
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 6 / Monday, January 10, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
indicated on the odometer and on the
odometer disclosure statement is
inaccurate. 49 U.S.C. 32705(a)(3); 49
CFR 580.5(e)(3). 49 U.S.C. 32705(a)(3).
Another purpose of TIMA is to
prevent alterations of disclosures on
titles and to preclude counterfeit titles
through secure processes. The agency
has determined that Wisconsin’s
electronic disclosure requirements are
as secure as current paper titles.
Wisconsin’s electronic odometer
statement is disclosed by the transferor
and accepted by the transferee, and
thereafter stored in a secure DMV
database system. When the State
maintains the e-Odometer database with
appropriate levels of security, electronic
recording of odometer readings and
disclosures will be maintained in a way
in which alteration is unlikely. The
odometer reading, which will be linked
to the electronic title record by the VIN,
cannot be altered except when it is
updated during the title transfer process
by authorized users. On subsequent title
transfers, the transferor and transferee
will have to complete the odometer
disclosure and acceptance for the
transaction to be completed.
When fully implemented, all
subsequent title transfers will be
performed through the APPS or e-MV11,
or other secure on-line process. Each
time an on-line title transfer occurs, the
DMV database system stores the
electronic version of the odometer
statement. The DMV will issue a paper
title only when necessary, e.g., title
transfer transactions that involve out-ofState parties. Since the title and
odometer statement remain in electronic
form under State care and custody, the
likelihood of an individual altering,
tampering or counterfeiting the title or
odometer statement is significantly
decreased. These electronic records will
be maintained in a secure environment
and any unauthorized access will be
detected by the system. Moreover, under
Wisconsin law, the electronic title
record is the official and controlling
title. If a conflict exists between the
electronic title and a paper title, the
paper title is void.
Another purpose of TIMA is to create
a record of the mileage on vehicles and
a paper trail. The underlying purposes
of this record trail are to enable
consumers to be better informed and
provide a mechanism through which
odometer tampering can be traced and
violators prosecuted. In NHTSA’s view,
the proposed Wisconsin’s electronic
title transfer system will create a scheme
of records, equivalent to the current
‘‘paper trail,’’ that assists law
enforcement in identifying and
prosecuting odometer fraud. Under the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:40 Jan 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
Wisconsin program, creation of a paper
trail starts with the requirement for
certain DMV customers to process title
transactions through the APPS program.
Under APPS, a DMV customer must
sign a written agreement with the DMV
that includes security procedures, an
account, and a secure logon ID. DMV
customers also must provide the DMV
with the names of the individuals
authorized to conduct transactions in
APPS. These individuals are issued a
secure logon ID and password that can
be traced by the DMV to their
transactions. In addition, APPS vendors
must create security protocols that
include an audit journal that can
identify each person responsible for
each title transaction. Vendors must also
provide the DMV with a daily report
detailing all security violations.
Furthermore, Wisconsin requires motor
vehicle dealers to retain copies of
electronic titles for motor vehicles
owned and offered for sale and
odometer statements received and given
for a period of 5 years.18
For individuals not using APPS, the
identity verification procedures require
the establishment of electronic
signatures of the parties. Due to the
system’s procedures for validating and
authenticating the electronic signature
of each individual through DMV’s
database, the electronic signatures of the
transferor and transferee are reliable,
readily detectable and can easily be
linked to particular individuals.19
Because the electronic signature
consists of data elements such as the
name, address, date of birth, product
number, driver license or identification
card number, and a Federal Employer
Identification Number or the last four or
five digits of the individual’s Social
Security number, Wisconsin’s
e-Odometer system can validate and
authenticate individual electronic
signatures. This authentication process
also allows Wisconsin to trace the
individuals involved in the transaction.
This capacity maintains the purposes of
creating a paper trail since the
Wisconsin system will have a history of
each vehicle’s title transfer and
18 Wisconsin indicates that its e-Odometer system
will permit motor vehicle dealers the ability to
retain copies of all odometer disclosure statements
received or given by the dealers.
19 Electronic signatures are generally valid under
applicable law. Congress recognized the growing
importance of electronic signatures in interstate
commerce when it enacted the Electronic
Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act
(E-Sign). See Public Law 106–229, 114 Stat. 464
(2000). E-Sign established a general rule of validity
for electronic records and electronic signatures. 15
U.S.C. 7001. It also encourages the use of electronic
signatures in commerce, both in private
transactions and transactions involving the Federal
government. 15 U.S.C. 7031(a).
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
odometer disclosure. These electronic
records will create the electronic
equivalent to a paper based system that
will be readily available to law
enforcement.
TIMA’s overall purpose is to protect
consumers by assuring that they receive
valid odometer disclosures representing
a vehicle’s actual mileage at the time of
transfer. Here, the alternate disclosure
requirements of Wisconsin’s program
include characteristics that will assure
that representations of a vehicle’s actual
mileage will be as valid as those found
in current paper title transfers. Identity
authentication, maintenance in a secure
electronic environment, and transferee
verification of the mileage data reported
by the transferor all help to ensure valid
disclosures. In addition, by providing
rapid access to records of past transfers
and by maintaining audit logs of each
and every title transfer transaction, the
Wisconsin program could potentially
provide a superior deterrent to odometer
fraud. Furthermore, Wisconsin’s
program offers the public the
opportunity to view the most recent
odometer reading and date of that
reading through an Internet application.
A prospective purchaser can access the
public e-Odometer information to assess
a vehicle’s true value by comparing the
vehicle’s current odometer reading to
the electronic record stored with the
DMV.
As discussed above, NHTSA has not
approved Wisconsin’s plan insofar as it
concerns leased vehicles. That program
is under development. We recognize
that while, in general, the AALA
supported the Wisconsin petition, in its
comments to the Initial Determination
the AALA raised several concerns. The
organization stated that Wisconsin’s
program should address interstate
transactions. The AALA’s comments
also contended that requiring lessors to
retain lessee odometer statements is
unnecessary since these statements will
be retained in Wisconsin’s e-Odometer
system. The AALA further contended
that lessees should be allowed to fill out
odometer statements electronically and
that the Secretary should make clear
that this practice is allowed. In the
AALA’s view, lessors should also be
able to electronically submit their own
odometer value when a lessee does not
submit an odometer statement and the
lessor is confident that it can provide a
valid odometer reading. The AALA also
requested that Wisconsin’s system allow
lessors to issue odometer statements
that will be verified by purchasers to
account for any miles accrued during
the resale process. The organization
added that lessors should be allowed to
issue disclosure statements where
E:\FR\FM\10JAR1.SGM
10JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 6 / Monday, January 10, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
multiple or amended statements are
needed to ensure accurate reporting
when leased vehicles are purchased by
lessees or a lessee’s employee but no
third-party reseller is involved. Finally,
the AALA stated that Wisconsin’s
proposal should state clearly that the
lessee odometer disclosure statement
may be provided by the driver. Since
this notice does not resolve the leased
vehicle part of Wisconsin’s program, we
are not addressing AALA’s comments. If
Wisconsin resubmits a petition
regarding leased vehicles, the AALA
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:40 Jan 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
will have an opportunity to comment on
it.
For the foregoing reasons, and upon
review of the entire record, NHTSA
hereby issues a final determination
granting Wisconsin’s petition for
requirements that apply in lieu of the
Federal requirements adopted under
section 408(d) of the Cost Savings Act,
other than the portions of the petition
addressing transfer of leased vehicles,
which Wisconsin indicates in its
comments will be addressed in a
separate petition. Other requirements of
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
1375
the Cost Savings Act continue to apply
in Wisconsin. NHTSA reserves the right
to rescind this determination in the
event that future information indicates
that the operation of Wisconsin’s
alternative disclosure system does not
satisfy one or more applicable
requirements.
Issued on: January 4, 2011.
David L. Strickland,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2011–148 Filed 1–7–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
E:\FR\FM\10JAR1.SGM
10JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 6 (Monday, January 10, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 1367-1375]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-148]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
49 CFR Part 580
[Docket No. NHTSA-2010-0046; Notice 2]
Petition for Approval of Alternate Odometer Disclosure
Requirements
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.
ACTION: Final Determination.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The State of Wisconsin has petitioned for approval of
alternate requirements to certain requirements under Federal odometer
law. NHTSA is issuing this final determination granting Wisconsin's
petition as it pertains to vehicle transfers. This determination does
not include vehicles covered by a lease agreement.
DATES: Effective Date: February 9, 2011.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov or the street
address listed above. Follow the online instructions for accessing the
dockets. Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78) or you may visit https://DocketInfo.dot.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Case, Office of the Chief
Counsel, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590 (Telephone: 202-366-2239)
(Fax: 202-366-3820).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
Federal odometer law, which is largely based on the Motor Vehicle
[[Page 1368]]
Information and Cost Savings Act (Cost Savings Act) \1\ and the Truth
in Mileage Act of 1986 \2\, as amended (TIMA), contains a number of
provisions to limit odometer fraud and assure that the purchaser of a
motor vehicle knows the true mileage of the vehicle. The Cost Savings
Act requires the Secretary of Transportation to promulgate regulations
requiring the transferor (seller) of a motor vehicle to provide a
written statement of the vehicle's mileage registered on the odometer
to the transferee (buyer) in connection with the transfer of ownership.
This written statement is generally referred to as the odometer
disclosure statement. Further, under TIMA, vehicle titles themselves
must have a space for the odometer disclosure statement, and States are
prohibited from licensing vehicles unless a valid odometer disclosure
statement on the title is signed and dated by the transferor. Titles
must also be printed by a secure printing process or other secure
process. TIMA also contains specific disclosure provisions on transfers
of leased vehicles. Federal law also contains document retention
requirements for motor vehicle dealers and lessors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Public Law 92-513, 86 Stat. 947, 961 (1972).
\2\ Public Law 99-579, 100 Stat. 3309 (1986).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
TIMA's motor vehicle mileage disclosure requirements apply in a
State unless the State has alternative requirements approved by the
Secretary. The Secretary has delegated administration of the odometer
program to NHTSA. A State may petition NHTSA for approval of such
alternate odometer disclosure requirements.
The State of Wisconsin has petitioned NHTSA for approval of
alternate odometer disclosure requirements under TIMA. The Wisconsin
Department of Transportation (WisDOT) proposes a paperless electronic
title transfer scheme, described more fully in section IV, similar to
the Commonwealth of Virginia's alternate odometer disclosure program,
approved by NHTSA on January 2, 2009. 74 FR 643, 650 (January 7, 2009).
Wisconsin's program will not apply to, or in lieu, of the provisions of
Federal odometer law related to, transactions involving at least one
out-of-State party.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ It also does not apply to disclosures by power of attorney
where the title is held by a lien holder because, in Wisconsin,
lienholders do not hold the vehicle title.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
With limited exceptions, NHTSA initially determined that
Wisconsin's proposal satisfied Federal odometer law, and proposed
granting Wisconsin's petition on the condition that it amend its
program or demonstrate that it meets the requirements of Federal law.
See 75 FR 20965 (April 22, 2010). To gain final approval, Wisconsin was
required to demonstrate that its program conforms to Federal odometer
law disclosure requirements specifying that an odometer disclosure
statement, including the brand, be made at the time of transfer when
the seller is unavailable.\4\ NHTSA's Initial Determination also asked
Wisconsin to address aspects of its e-Odometer program relating to
transfer of leased vehicles. As addressed below, Wisconsin will submit
a separate petition regarding transfer of leased vehicles. After
careful consideration of comments, and the entire record, NHTSA is
granting Wisconsin's petition for title transfers other than those
involving a lease agreement. NHTSA's analysis is set forth below in
Section VI.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Section 408 of the Cost Savings Act, recodified at 49
U.S.C. 32705, and 49 CFR 580.5(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Statutory Background
NHTSA reviewed the statutory background of Federal odometer law in
its consideration and approval of Virginia's petition for alternate
odometer disclosure requirements. See 73 FR 35617 (June 24, 2008) and
74 FR 643 (January 7, 2009). The statutory background of the Cost
Savings Act and TIMA, and the purposes behind TIMA, are discussed at
length in NHTSA's Final Determination granting Virginia's petition. 74
FR 643, 647-48. A brief summary of the statutory background of Federal
odometer law and the purposes of TIMA follows.
In 1972, Congress enacted the Cost Savings Act, among other things,
to prohibit tampering of odometers on motor vehicles and to establish
certain safeguards for the protection of purchasers with respect to the
sale of motor vehicles having altered or reset odometers. See Public
Law 92-513, section 401, 86 Stat. 947, 961-63 (1972). The Cost Savings
Act required that, under regulations to be published by the Secretary,
the transferor of a motor vehicle provide a written vehicle mileage
disclosure to the transferee, prohibited odometer tampering and
provided for enforcement. See Id. at section 408, 86 Stat. at 947.
Section 408 states that the Secretary shall prescribe rules requiring
any transferor of a motor vehicle to provide a written disclosure to
the transferee that includes the cumulative mileage on the odometer and
if the odometer reading is known to be different than the miles the
vehicle has actually traveled, a statement that the actual mileage is
unknown. In general, the purpose for the disclosure was to assist
purchasers to know the true mileage of a motor vehicle.
A major shortcoming of the odometer provisions of the Cost Savings
Act was that they did not require that the odometer disclosure
statement be on the title. In a number of States, they were on separate
documents that could be altered easily or discarded and did not travel
with the title. See 74 FR 644. Consequently, the disclosure statements
did not necessarily deter odometer fraud employing altered documents,
discarded titles, and title washing. Id.
Congress enacted TIMA in 1986 to address the Cost Savings Act's
shortcomings. It amended the Cost Savings Act to prohibit States from
licensing vehicles after transfers of ownership unless the new owner
(transferee) submitted a title from the seller (transferor) containing
the seller's signed and dated statement of the vehicle's mileage, as
previously required by the Cost Savings Act. See Public Law 99-579, 100
Stat. 3309 (1986); 74 FR 644 (Jan. 7, 2009). TIMA also prohibits the
licensing of vehicles for use in any State unless the title issued to
the transferee is printed using a secure printing process or other
secure process, indicates the vehicle mileage at the time of transfer,
and contains additional space for a subsequent mileage disclosure by
the transferee when it is sold again. Id. Other provisions created
similar safeguards for leased vehicles.
TIMA added a provision to the Cost Savings Act that, with the
approval of the Secretary of Transportation, allows States to have
alternate requirements to those required under TIMA respecting the
disclosure of mileage. It amended Section 408 of the Cost Savings Act
to add a new subsection (f), which provided that the requirements of
subsections (d) and (e)(1) respecting the disclosure of motor vehicle
mileage when motor vehicles are transferred or leased shall apply in a
State unless the State has in effect alternate motor vehicle mileage
disclosure requirements approved by the Secretary. Subsection (f)
provided further that the Secretary shall approve alternate motor
vehicle mileage disclosure requirements submitted by a State unless the
Secretary determines that such requirements are not consistent with the
purpose of the disclosure required by subsection (d) or (e), as the
case may be.
In 1988, Congress amended section 408(d) of the Cost Savings Act to
permit the use of a secure power of attorney in circumstances where the
title was held by a lienholder. The Secretary was required to publish a
rule to implement the provision. See Public Law 100-561
[[Page 1369]]
section 40, 102 Stat. 2805, 2817 (1988), which added Section
408(d)(2)(C). In 1990, Congress amended section 408(d)(2)(C) of the
Cost Savings Act. The amendment addressed retention of powers of
attorneys by States and provided that the rule adopted by the Secretary
not require that a vehicle be titled in the State in which the power of
attorney was issued. See Public Law 101-641 section 7(a), 104 Stat.
4654, 4657 (1990).
In 1994, in the course of the recodification of various laws
pertaining to the Department of Transportation, the Cost Savings Act,
as amended, was repealed, reenacted, and recodified without substantive
change. See Public Law 103-272, 108 Stat. 745, 1048-1056, 1379, 1387
(1994). The odometer statute is now codified at 49 U.S.C. 32701 et seq.
In particular, Section 408(a) of the Cost Savings Act was recodified at
49 U.S.C. 32705(a). Sections 408(d) and (e), which were added by TIMA
(and later amended), were recodified at 49 U.S.C. 32705(b) and (c). The
provisions pertaining to approval of State alternate motor vehicle
mileage disclosure requirements were recodified at 49 U.S.C. 32705(d).
III. Statutory Purposes
As discussed above, the Cost Savings Act, as amended by TIMA in
1986, states that NHTSA ``shall approve alternate motor vehicle mileage
disclosure requirements submitted by a State unless the [NHTSA]
determines that such requirements are not consistent with the purpose
of the disclosure required by subsection (d) or (e) as the case may
be.'' (Subsections 408(d), (e) of the Cost Savings Act were recodified
to 49 U.S.C. 32705(b) and (c)). In light of this provision, we now turn
to our interpretation of the purposes of these subsections as germane
to Wisconsin's petition.
Our Final Determination granting Virginia's petition for alternate
odometer disclosure requirements identified the purposes of TIMA
germane to petitions for approval of odometer disclosure requirements
that did not include disclosures involving leased vehicles or
disclosures by power of attorney.\5\ 74 FR 643, 647-48 (January 7,
2009). A brief summary of the purposes identified in the Virginia Final
Determination follows. In the Initial Determination of Wisconsin's
petition, the Agency identified the purposes of TIMA relevant to
odometer disclosures for transfer of leased vehicles. 75 FR 20972-73.
Since, as explained below, Wisconsin has indicated that it will submit
a separate petition regarding transfer of leased vehicles, the purposes
of TIMA relevant to leased vehicles are not discussed here.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Since Virginia's program did not cover disclosures involving
leased vehicles or disclosures by power of attorney, the purposes of
Sections 408(d)(2)(C) and 408(e) of the Cost Savings Act, as
amended, were not germane and were not addressed in the notice
approving the Virginia program. See 74 FR 647 n. 12.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
One purpose of TIMA is to assure that the form of the odometer
disclosure precludes odometer fraud. 74 FR 647. To prevent odometer
fraud facilitated by disclosure statements that were separate from
titles, TIMA required mileage disclosures to be on a secure vehicle
title instead of a separate document. These titles also had to contain
space for the seller's attested mileage disclosure and a new disclosure
by the purchaser when the vehicle was sold again. This discouraged
mileage alterations on titles and limited opportunities for obtaining
new titles with lower mileage than the actual mileage. Id.
A second purpose of TIMA is to prevent odometer fraud by processes
and mechanisms making odometer mileage disclosures on the title a
condition of any application for a title and a requirement for any
title issued by a State. 74 FR 647. This provision was intended to
eliminate or significantly reduce abuses associated with lack of
control of the titling process. Id.
Third, TIMA sought to prevent alterations of disclosures on titles
and to preclude counterfeit titles through secure processes. 74 FR 648.
In furtherance of these purposes, paper titles (incorporating the
disclosure statement) must be produced using a secure printing process
or protected by ``other secure process.'' \6\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Congress intended to encourage new technologies by including
the language ``other secure process.'' The House Report accompanying
TIMA noted that `` `other secure process' is intended to describe
means other than printing which could securely provide for the
storage and transmittal of title and mileage information.'' H.R.
Rep. No. 99-833, at 33 (1986). ``In adopting this language, the
Committee intends to encourage new technologies which will provide
increased levels of security for titles.'' Id. See also Cost Savings
Act, as amended by TIMA, section 408(d), recodified at 49 U.S.C.
32705(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A fourth purpose is to create a record of vehicle mileage and a
paper trail. 74 FR 648. The underlying purposes of this record and
paper trail were to better inform consumers and provide mechanisms for
tracing odometer tampering and prosecuting violators. TIMA's
requirement that new applications for titles include signed mileage
disclosure statements on the titles from the prior owners creates a
permanent record that is easily checked by subsequent owners or law
enforcement officials. This record provides critical snapshots of
vehicle mileage at every transfer, which are the fundamental links of
this paper trail.
Finally, the general purpose of TIMA is to protect consumers by
assuring that they receive valid representations of the vehicle's
actual mileage at the time of transfer based on odometer disclosures.
74 FR 648.
IV. The Wisconsin Program
As explained in NHTSA's Initial Determination, Wisconsin petitions
for approval of alternate odometer disclosure requirements. 75 FR
20965, 20967 (Apr. 22, 2010). Wisconsin requests alternate disclosure
requirements for motor vehicle private party (including motor vehicle
dealers) transfers, including transactions involving a lienholder.\7\
Wisconsin's petition included a request for alternate odometer
disclosure requirements for transactions involving leased vehicles but,
as explained below, Wisconsin states that it will submit a separate
petition addressing electronic odometer disclosure for leased vehicle
transfers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Under Wisconsin law, a lienholder does not physically
possess the title to the vehicle; the title remains with the vehicle
owner. Thus, Wisconsin does not permit odometer disclosure by power
of attorney when title is held by a lienholder and does not petition
for alternate requirements regarding odometer disclosure by power of
attorney. Wisconsin does accept a written odometer disclosure by
power of attorney from an out-of-state party that registers the
vehicle in Wisconsin.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Recent Wisconsin legislation establishes that the title, title
application, and other specified information maintained by the DMV in
its database are the original and controlling title records for a
vehicle. See Wis. Stat. Ann. Sec. 342.01(2)(ac) and Sec. 342.09(4)
(2009). Wisconsin proposes creating an electronic odometer statement
(e-Odometer) residing in the WisDOT Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV)
database as the official odometer statement. Under the proposal, a
distinct e-Odometer system will be created to accept and maintain e-
Odometer statements as stand-alone electronic records, separate from an
electronic title. E-Odometer statements will be linked to, and become
part of the title record in the DMV database. The DMV's titling system
will automatically link the e-Odometer statements to a vehicle's title
whenever an electronic title transaction occurs, and a title transfer
could not be completed unless proper odometer disclosure is entered in
the e-Odometer record. According to Wisconsin's petition, if a paper
title is needed, the DMV will print it on secure paper with the
odometer disclosure
[[Page 1370]]
statement in the proper location and format.
Wisconsin's original petition encompassed transfers of leased
vehicles. In the Initial Determination, NHTSA raised questions about
this aspect of Wisconsin's program. In its comments on that
Determination, Wisconsin stated that lessee odometer disclosure would
be addressed in the second implementation phase, and that the State
would consult with NHTSA. Wisconsin asked that NHTSA approve its
petition with the understanding that Wisconsin would consult with NHTSA
to satisfy all requirements. If NHTSA is unable to approve the State's
petition with that provision, the State requested approval of the
petition except for the lessor/lessee transaction process. The State
would expect to file a separate petition for approval of the lessor/
lessee transaction in the future. NHTSA cannot approve a petition or
part of a petition on the basis of future consultations. As a result,
NHTSA is unable to grant Wisconsin's petition as it pertains to
transfers of vehicles involving a lease agreement. This is without
prejudice for Wisconsin to develop e-Odometer provisions for the
transfer of leased vehicles in a future phase of its implementation
plan and to petition NHTSA for approval of electronic leased vehicle
odometer disclosure in the future. We will not discuss Wisconsin's
proposal for leased vehicles below.
A. Overview of Wisconsin's Electronic Titling System
Wisconsin has implemented a titling system that permits
individuals, organizations and businesses (collectively, DMV Customers)
to process vehicle title transactions electronically through its
automated processing partnership system (APPS) program. See Wis. Admin.
Code Sec. Trans 1565.01. Under APPS, a vendor \8\ approved by the DMV
\9\ creates a computer system to link or interface DMV customers with
the DMV database. The link permits the DMV customer to access the DMV
database and conduct authorized title transactions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ According to Wisconsin's petition, a ``vendor'' is a person,
business or organization that contracts with the DMV to provide a
host computer system by which agents may obtain access to specified
information services. Wis. Admin. Code Sec. Trans 156.02(8). An
approved vendor must work with Wisconsin's DMV to develop an
automated interface software application that meets the automated
interface specifications prescribed by DMV. Wis. Admin. Code Sec.
Trans 156.03(4).
\9\ In order to become an approved vendor, an entity must submit
an application with certain information to DMV, submit an approved
implementation plan, work with DMV to meet the automated interface
specifications prescribed by DMV and execute a contract with DMV.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In order to gain direct access to the DMV's database under the
vendor system, a DMV customer must enter into an agreement with an
approved vendor, obtain DMV approval to process title transactions, and
enter into a contract with the DMV. To maintain system security and
integrity, employees of DMV customers using the interface will have to
submit a signed affidavit to the DMV before accessing the system. Once
the DMV customer complies with these requirements, the DMV customer
will be able to perform authorized title transactions directly within
the DMV's system.
Currently, Wisconsin requires motor vehicle dealers to
electronically process title transactions for vehicles that they sell.
See Wis. Stat. Ann. Sec. 342.16(1)(a) and (am) (2009); Wis. Admin.
Code Sec. Trans 141.01. Motor vehicle dealers can perform electronic
titling transactions through APPS or through an Internet-based
interface with the DMV, known as e-MV11. In order to process title
transactions using the e-MV11, a DMV customer must apply to the DMV by
submitting an application setting forth the name, address and contact
of the entity and providing the names and access authority of employees
performing title transactions. After setting up the required security
protocols, the DMV customer can enter the appropriate title
transaction.\10\ Also, under Wisconsin's electronic titling program,
motor vehicle dealers are required to maintain and keep their title
transactions records, including odometer disclosure statements, for
five years. See Wis. Admin. Code Sec. Trans 141.08(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ According to Wisconsin's petition, authorized transactions
for amending an electronic odometer record are or will be:
1. Dealer sales to private buyers, including purchases and
trade-ins from private buyers;
2. Dealer reassignments to other dealers;
3. Consignor statement when consigning a vehicle for sale;
4. Dealer or auction purchase of out-of-state vehicle and
subsequent sale of vehicle with Wisconsin title (Wisconsin could
produce a secure paper title for use by the other State.);
5. DMV odometer corrections on title;
6. Involuntary liens from towing/storage, landlord, or mechanic;
7. Repossessions;
8. Private sales where title is processed by DMV agent or
financial institution;
9. Lessee to lessor statement upon relinquishing a leased
vehicle; and
10. Private sales using e-MVPublic.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to Wisconsin's petition, the electronic titling program
will be expanded to include other persons, businesses, and
organizations. These businesses and organizations, such as lienholders
or auction companies, will conduct electronic title transactions
through APPS. Individuals conducting private sales of unencumbered
vehicles will eventually have the ability to perform title transfer and
odometer disclosure through an Internet-based application called e-
MVPublic.
B. Wisconsin's e-Odometer Program
Wisconsin asserts that e-Odometer entries will provide a virtual
replacement of existing secure paper odometer disclosure statements for
vehicle transactions. Under Wisconsin's proposal, the e-Odometer system
will be a unique electronic application within Wisconsin's electronic
title transfer system. Although the e-Odometer entry will be a stand-
alone secure electronic record, it will be safely and securely
electronically linked to the electronic title record of the vehicle by
the vehicle identification number (VIN) and become part of the vehicle
title. Title transfer could not occur unless the transferor and
transferee, or other authorized persons such as dealer employees,
perform the required disclosure and acceptance through the e-Odometer
system. Once the odometer disclosure and acceptance is completed, the
statement is stored in the e-Odometer system and linked to the
electronic title record by the VIN.
The petition states that the following information will be stored
in the secure e-Odometer record:
1. VIN;
2. Description of the vehicle by make, model, model year and body
type;
3. Odometer reading and date of the reading;
4. The Brand (actual, not actual or exceeds limits of odometer);
5. Name, address of person disclosing odometer reading (must match
the transferor);
6. Name, address of person accepting odometer reading (must match
the transferee); and
7. Statement reference to Federal law requirement and potential
penalties.
Some of the e-Odometer information and other vehicle information
will be available to DMV personnel through a DMV vehicle inquiry
function, while limited information will be available to the public
through a public inquiry function. The information available to DMV
personnel includes:
1. Vehicle description;
2. Title owner information;
3. Brands, if any;
4. Most current odometer reading, status and date recorded;
5. Odometer reading, status and record date history;
6. Lien information; and
[[Page 1371]]
7. Owner in possession of the vehicle.
The publicly available information includes:
1. Vehicle description;
2. Most current odometer reading, status and date recorded;
3. Brands, if any; and
4. Lien information.
Wisconsin's petition states that creation of or amendments to e-
Odometer records will be possible only when titles are transferred in
the course of authorized transactions by authorized persons.
C. Wisconsin e-Odometer Implementation Schedule
Wisconsin plans to implement its e-Odometer program in three
phases. Because motor vehicle dealers are already required to complete
title transactions electronically, Wisconsin intends to begin the e-
Odometer program with these dealers. See Wis. Stat. Ann. Sec.
342.16(1)(a) and (am) (2009); Wis. Admin. Code Sec. Trans 141.01. The
second phase will implement e-Odometer in title transfers involving
lienholders, motor vehicle auctions, and vehicle repossessions. The
final phase will implement e-Odometer in transfers of unencumbered
motor vehicles between private individuals. Phase two and three are
still under development and Wisconsin has not provided an estimated
implementation schedule. According to the petition, during phase-in,
some odometer disclosure transactions will be electronic but some will
continue to be on the secure paper title and secure paper odometer
statement.
1. Phase One: e-Odometer in Dealer Transactions
Wisconsin's petition states e-Odometer will apply first to motor
vehicle transfers through motor vehicle dealers. During this phase,
eligible title transactions include reassignments among dealers,
consignments, and retail sales. In order to complete a transaction,
there must be an odometer disclosure and acceptance of the odometer
statement. The odometer disclosure and acceptance will be permitted
between the following persons: (1) Authorized dealer personnel and an
individual buyer; (2) an individual seller trading in a vehicle and
authorized dealer personnel; (3) authorized dealer personnel in the
case of dealer reassignments; and (4) an individual vehicle owner and
an authorized person on behalf of a consignee in the case of vehicle
consignment. According to Wisconsin, the identities of all persons
involved will be verified and authenticated through the DMV's
processes.
Under Wisconsin's plan, dealer title transfer transactions will be
completed through an APPS's vendor interface application or the e-MV11
Internet-based application. During these title transfer transactions,
e-Odometer forms will be imported into the transaction and completed by
the authorized persons.
2. Phase 2: e-Odometer in Title Transactions between Private Parties
Involving Lienholders and Other Commercial Entities
Wisconsin's petition states that the second phase will incorporate
e-Odometer procedures into title transfers in a number of
circumstances, including between private parties when there is a lien
on the vehicle. These title transactions will be processed by the
financial institution holding the lien. During this phase, e-Odometer
will be available to the financial institution through the APPS
application or an application WisDOT develops for these lenders.
Because lienholders do not possess titles under Wisconsin law, a
satisfied lienholder will access e-Odometer to electronically release
the lien to allow production of a clear title. To facilitate this
process, e-Odometer forms will be available to buyers and sellers
through an Internet application allowing completion of the required
odometer disclosures and acceptances.
During this second phase, Wisconsin also plans to incorporate use
of the e-Odometer system into title transfers involving motor vehicle
auctions, involuntary vehicle transfers (i.e. involuntary liens and
repossessions), corrections to odometer information on titles, and
other transactions involving secure odometer statements.
3. Phase 3: e-Odometer in Private Sales
The last phase of Wisconsin's program will incorporate e-Odometer
entries into private sales of unencumbered vehicles. The title transfer
will be conducted through an on-line application called e-MVPublic.\11\
For private transfers of motor vehicles, odometer disclosure and
acceptance will be accomplished by the seller and buyer through e-
MVPublic once their identities are verified by DMV processes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ For individuals without Internet access, Wisconsin is
considering providing access to e-MVPublic at its DMV service
centers. At a minimum, Wisconsin states that public libraries offer
public access to computers and the Internet, which will enable
individuals without Internet to use e-Odometer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
D. Identity Verification Under Wisconsin e-Odometer
Wisconsin's petition describes two verification processes whose
operation differs depending on whether the user is a DMV partner or
regular customer (such as a dealer or financial institution) or an
intermittent user. For a DMV partner or regular customer, the first
step is being approved by the DMV to access its database. As part of
the approval process, the entity must provide the legal business name
and address of the business. After approval, identity verification
procedures will require these users to enter into an agreement with the
DMV that includes security procedures--including establishing an
account and secure logon ID. The users are identified and authenticated
through a unique ``user ID'' and password that are traced to a
particular person on the account.
Vendors will manage the verification process. The Wisconsin APPS
program requires approved vendors to design precise electronic security
and audit trail procedures into its interface, which DMV will then
verify. This interface requires three administrative steps to identify,
authenticate, and authorize users of the DMV's database. First, vendors
must create an audit journal to identify the individual responsible for
each transaction. Vendors assign each user a ``user ID'' that can be
traced to the individual user. Next, to authenticate the user, a
password known only to the user that is associated with the ``user ID''
is entered before a transaction is allowed. If an individual user is
not authorized by the vendor for the type of transaction requested, the
system will immediately terminate the transaction. Last, vendors must
authorize the user to access the appropriate information. In addition
to the identification protocols, vendors must create and maintain
access logs that can be used for auditing and recording keeping, which
include, among other things, a history of each customer transaction.
Under Wisconsin's plan, DMV partners and regular customers must
submit the identity of each employee who will conduct title
transactions and specify each employee's authority to perform
transactions in the DMV's database. Prior to obtaining authorization
from the DMV to conduct title transfer transactions, each employee must
submit a signed affidavit acknowledging security procedures and
safeguards. The DMV must confirm each user's authorization before the
user can process title transactions.
For individuals who are not DMV partners or regular customers,
[[Page 1372]]
Wisconsin will require individuals to establish an electronic signature
that can uniquely identify the person. Identity verification begins
with the customer entering a minimum of three personal identifiers for
the correct customer record in the DMV database. Personal identifiers
include name, address, date of birth, product number, Driver License/ID
number, and a Federal Employer Identification Number or partial Social
Security Number (possibly the last four or five digits).\12\ After the
user inputs the personal identifiers into the system, the system will
check DMV customer records and verify that the user is the correct
individual or business, and will authorize the customer to update the
odometer statement. Once the user is verified, the user can begin the
title transaction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ Wisconsin prohibits nonresidents from applying for a
Wisconsin title, except in certain limited exceptions. See Wis.
Admin. Code Sec. Trans 154.13(2). A nonresident who is eligible to
apply for a Wisconsin title will not be considered a DMV partner or
regular customer. These nonresidents will be subject to the e-
Odometer requirements as long as the vehicle is titled and
transferred within Wisconsin.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
E. Odometer Disclosure Under Wisconsin e-Odometer
Wisconsin's petition states that two parties must engage in an
authorized e-Odometer transaction to effectuate the odometer
disclosure. In order to conduct the e-Odometer disclosure, each party
will access the DMV database by providing information to satisfy the
identity verification requirements of the system and the VIN of the
vehicle. Under Wisconsin's proposal, a transferor must disclose the
odometer reading and brand (actual/not actual/exceeding odometer
limits) and the transferee must accept the odometer reading to allow
the transaction to go forward.\13\ The e-Odometer transaction will
remain in a pending status between the transferor and transferee until
each party completes the required actions, e.g., disclosure by the
seller and acceptance by the buyer. Once both actions have been
accomplished, the e-Odometer record will be secured within DMV's
database and become part of the electronic title through the VIN.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ Wisconsin states that there are a limited number of
exceptions under Wisconsin law and e-Odometer to the requirement for
two parties to engage in a transaction to update a title. One
exception is involuntary transfer of the vehicle through
repossession by a financial institution in which the title is issued
to the financial institution. This exception is permissible under
Federal odometer law because repossession is not a transfer of
ownership and does not require an odometer disclosure statement. See
49 CFR 580.3. Another exception is when the seller is not available.
If the seller is not available, the DMV database permits the
transferee to state the odometer reading with a brand of ``not
actual.'' If the transferor becomes available to make the
disclosure, DMV will change the recorded status to ``actual.'' This
exception does not conform to Federal odometer law, which requires
an odometer disclosure statement, including the brand, at the time
of transfer of ownership. 49 U.S.C. 32705(a)(1); 49 CFR 580.5(a).
Federal odometer law does not permit subsequent alterations to the
brand as contemplated by Wisconsin. NHTSA believes that permitting
such an exception could create a loophole that will be abused.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To clarify the e-Odometer procedure, Wisconsin provides an exemplar
title transaction involving a dealer trade-in. In a vehicle trade-in
transaction, the customer (transferor) must bring the paper title to
the dealer (transferee) at the time of the transfer. After entering all
the required data in the Wisconsin electronic title system and
initiating the e-Odometer process, the dealer will then destroy the
paper title.\14\ Under the e-Odometer process, the customer discloses
the odometer reading (and brand) and the dealer accepts the odometer
reading. The vehicle's odometer reading is then stored in the DMV
database and linked virtually to the vehicle's title through the VIN.
Upon later sale of the trade-in vehicle, the dealer (as the transferor)
must disclose the odometer reading (and brand) and the vehicle buyer
(as the transferee) must accept the odometer reading. The dealer and
buyer will access e-Odometer at the time of the sale to complete the
disclosure and acceptance of the odometer statement, which upon
acceptance by the buyer secures the odometer statement in the DMV's
database. After the sale of the vehicle is completed, the dealer
completes title processing in APPS or e-MV11 by titling the vehicle in
the consumer's name, verifying that secure odometer disclosure has been
completed. After titling is complete, the updated e-Odometer entry
becomes part of the title record. For in-State transactions, a paper
title is issued only upon request.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ According to Wisconsin, the dealer's failure to destroy the
title subjects the dealer to civil penalties and other sanctions,
such as license suspension or removal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
F. Wisconsin's Position on Meeting the Purposes of TIMA
Wisconsin has maintained that its e-Odometer program meets the
purposes of TIMA, as described by NHTSA in its Final Determination on
the Commonwealth of Virginia's petition for alternate odometer
disclosure requirements. See 74 FR 643, 647-48 (January 7, 2009).
Wisconsin's petition states that e-Odometer is part of the
vehicle's title. Under e-Odometer, the VIN links the odometer statement
to the title record. The system automatically imports e-Odometer into
the title transfer transaction process conducted by the transferor and
transferee. A title transaction cannot occur unless the odometer
disclosure statement is made and accepted. The e-Odometer information
is then secured, stored, and becomes visible through the vehicle's
electronic title record.
According to the petition, other system requirements provide a
significant level of security for the e-Odometer system. First, title
transfer cannot occur unless the authorized persons update e-Odometer
entries. Second, only those persons authorized to make title transfer
transactions (e.g., authorized dealer personnel or authenticated
private owners) are able to make e-Odometer statements. Third, odometer
disclosure under the e-Odometer system is only permitted when a title
is transferred.\15\ If a title is required to be printed on a secure
title paper, the DMV system will automatically include the odometer
disclosure information on the printed title. If a title on secure title
paper is used in a vehicle transfer, the odometer information shown on
the secure paper title will be entered into the e-Odometer electronic
record during the title transfer transaction process and the paper
title will be destroyed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ As noted above, there are some exceptions under Wisconsin
law.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wisconsin's petition also states that odometer disclosure is a
required data input for application for a title and a required output
on the title. According to the petition, the odometer disclosure and
acceptance is a required input to an electronic title transaction,
whether performed through APPS or e-MV11. Although APPS permits
odometer disclosure and acceptance at different times, e-Odometer
secures the disclosure and acceptance and stores it electronically
until the odometer disclosure is imported during title processing.
Wisconsin's petition asserts that e-Odometer provides a level of
security against altering, tampering, and counterfeiting equivalent to
the odometer statement on a secure paper title. According to Wisconsin,
the e-Odometer statement is secured in the DMV database as soon as the
transferor electronically discloses and the transferee accepts the
odometer reading. After the transferee accepts the odometer disclosure,
e-Odometer stores that mileage disclosure, the date, and the names and
addresses of the
[[Page 1373]]
transferor and transferee, and will not allow any changes to that
entry.
Finally, Wisconsin's petition contends that the authentication and
verification of the transferor's and transferee's electronic signatures
are readily detectable and reliably traced to the particular
individual. Wisconsin states that the DMV has established extensive
security procedures for vendors who process vehicle transactions on
behalf of the DMV and regularly interact with the DMV, and for
individuals and intermittent business customers who wish to make
entries in DMV records. Wisconsin's security procedures are governed
under Wisconsin statutes, administrative rules, contracts, DMV policy
and procedure, and electronic security protocols. DMV Partners and
regular business customers will access the e-Odometer system through
secure applications that are already in use for vehicle title
transactions. Individuals and intermittent business customers will
access the e-Odometer system through a secure Internet application.
Both applications require information, such as electronic signatures,
that can authenticate and verify the users' identity.
V. Summary of Public Comments
NHTSA received comments from two entities: (1) WisDOT; and (2) the
American Automotive Leasing Association (AALA). The AALA comments are
discussed in section VI below.
WisDOT's comments responded to NHTSA requirements in the Agency's
Initial Determination that Wisconsin (1) conform its program to the
requirements of Federal odometer law by not permitting the alteration
of the brand on an electronic odometer statement when the seller of the
vehicle is unavailable at the time of the transfer, or fully explains
how this exception complies with the law and its purposes; (2) permit
lessors to retain each odometer disclosure statement they give and
receive; and (3) clarify the system's ability to allow lessors to place
a different brand on the disclosure statement in those instances where
the lessor believes, or has reason to believe, that the statement
provided by the lessee is inaccurate. WisDOT submitted comments
indicating that it will manage e-odometer disclosure when a seller is
unavailable by requiring the buyer to give the odometer reading with a
brand of ``not actual,'' and specifying that the ``not actual'' brand
cannot be changed, even if the seller appears later.
While Wisconsin will seek approval of alternate odometer disclosure
requirements for leased vehicle transfers at a later date, its comments
addressed NHTSA's concerns about these transfers. Wisconsin indicated
that it will create a mandatory system for lessors to retain all
odometer statements they receive for the five-year period required by
Federal regulations, 49 CFR 580.8(b). Wisconsin also indicated that it
will build e-Odometer to facilitate odometer statements by lessors if
the lessor believes, or has reason to believe, that the lessee's
disclosure does not reflect the actual mileage of the vehicle.
VI. NHTSA's Final Determination
In this part, NHTSA considers the Wisconsin program in light of the
purposes of the disclosure required by subsection (d) of section 408 of
the Cost Savings Act.\16\ We also respond to comments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ Since Wisconsin's program does not cover disclosures by
power of attorney or transfers involving leased vehicles, the
purposes of sections 408(d)(1)(c) and (e) of the Cost Savings Act as
amended by TIMA are not germane. Thus, Wisconsin continues to be
subject to all Federal requirements that are not based on sections
408(d)(1)(A), (B), and (2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under the Cost Savings Act, as amended by TIMA, the standard is
that NHTSA ``shall'' approve alternate motor vehicle mileage disclosure
requirements submitted by a State unless NHTSA determines that such
requirements are not consistent with the purpose of the disclosure
required by subsection (d) or (e) as the case may be. The purposes are
discussed above, as is the Wisconsin alternate program.
As explained above, one purpose of the disclosures under section
408(d) and (e) of the Cost Savings Act is to assure that the form of
the odometer disclosure precludes odometer fraud. NHTSA has determined
that Wisconsin's alternate electronic odometer disclosure requirements
satisfy this purpose. Under Wisconsin's program, the vehicle's odometer
reading must be entered in the course of the title transfer transaction
for transfer of title to occur. The reading is disclosed by the
transferor and, if valid, accepted by the transferee. Thereafter the
odometer disclosure statement will reside as an electronic record in
the DMV database and will be linked to the vehicle's title by the VIN.
This electronic odometer disclosure is a required element of the
transfer and part of the title record in the DMV database. If a hard
copy of the title is needed, Wisconsin generates a title with the
odometer disclosure statement on the title using a secure printing
process. Wisconsin's system will, therefore, have the odometer
disclosure as part of the vehicle title as required by TIMA. Also,
Wisconsin's electronic title and odometer system provides an electronic
equivalent to TIMA's requirement that the title contain a space for the
transferor to disclose the vehicle's mileage. For conventional paper
transactions in Wisconsin, hard copies of electronic titles will
continue to provide a separate space for owners to execute a proper
odometer disclosure in keeping with TIMA and current practice.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ Wisconsin notes that paper titles will be produced for
title transfer transactions that involve out-of-state parties, such
as a vehicle sale to an out-of-state dealer or retail purchaser, an
auction sale to an out-of-state dealer or a retail consumer in
Wisconsin that requests a paper title.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Another purpose of TIMA is to prevent odometer fraud by processes
and mechanisms making the disclosure of an odometer mileage on the
title a condition for the application for a title and a requirement for
the title issued by the State. NHTSA has determined that Wisconsin's
title transfer process satisfies this purpose by requiring disclosure
and acceptance of odometer information before the transaction can be
completed. If the transaction is successful, the DMV's system will
create or amend an electronic title and store the linked electronic
odometer statement. A new title will not be issued without entry and
acceptance of the odometer disclosure. Our Initial Determination raised
a question about alteration of the brand. Wisconsin indicated in its
petition that, if the seller is not available at the time of transfer
of ownership, the DMV database permits the transferee to state the
odometer reading with a brand of ``not actual.'' If the transferor
later becomes available to make the disclosure and does so, DMV would
change the recorded status to ``actual.'' In the Initial Determination,
NHTSA stated that a change to the title subsequent to transfer of the
vehicle does not conform to Federal odometer law, which requires an
odometer disclosure statement, including the brand, to be made at the
time of transfer. 75 FR 20965, 20971 (April 22, 2010) (citing 49 U.S.C.
32705(a)(1); 49 CFR 580.5(a)). Wisconsin's comments to our Initial
Determination indicate that Wisconsin's program will not permit a post-
transfer change of the brand. Wisconsin allows the buyer to give the
odometer reading a brand of ``not actual'' where not properly completed
by the seller, and this brand cannot be changed, even if the seller
appears later. The Agency notes that a transferor and/or transferee
cannot incorporate a ``not actual'' brand to the odometer disclosure
statement as a matter of course or convenience, but only if the mileage
[[Page 1374]]
indicated on the odometer and on the odometer disclosure statement is
inaccurate. 49 U.S.C. 32705(a)(3); 49 CFR 580.5(e)(3). 49 U.S.C.
32705(a)(3).
Another purpose of TIMA is to prevent alterations of disclosures on
titles and to preclude counterfeit titles through secure processes. The
agency has determined that Wisconsin's electronic disclosure
requirements are as secure as current paper titles. Wisconsin's
electronic odometer statement is disclosed by the transferor and
accepted by the transferee, and thereafter stored in a secure DMV
database system. When the State maintains the e-Odometer database with
appropriate levels of security, electronic recording of odometer
readings and disclosures will be maintained in a way in which
alteration is unlikely. The odometer reading, which will be linked to
the electronic title record by the VIN, cannot be altered except when
it is updated during the title transfer process by authorized users. On
subsequent title transfers, the transferor and transferee will have to
complete the odometer disclosure and acceptance for the transaction to
be completed.
When fully implemented, all subsequent title transfers will be
performed through the APPS or e-MV11, or other secure on-line process.
Each time an on-line title transfer occurs, the DMV database system
stores the electronic version of the odometer statement. The DMV will
issue a paper title only when necessary, e.g., title transfer
transactions that involve out-of-State parties. Since the title and
odometer statement remain in electronic form under State care and
custody, the likelihood of an individual altering, tampering or
counterfeiting the title or odometer statement is significantly
decreased. These electronic records will be maintained in a secure
environment and any unauthorized access will be detected by the system.
Moreover, under Wisconsin law, the electronic title record is the
official and controlling title. If a conflict exists between the
electronic title and a paper title, the paper title is void.
Another purpose of TIMA is to create a record of the mileage on
vehicles and a paper trail. The underlying purposes of this record
trail are to enable consumers to be better informed and provide a
mechanism through which odometer tampering can be traced and violators
prosecuted. In NHTSA's view, the proposed Wisconsin's electronic title
transfer system will create a scheme of records, equivalent to the
current ``paper trail,'' that assists law enforcement in identifying
and prosecuting odometer fraud. Under the Wisconsin program, creation
of a paper trail starts with the requirement for certain DMV customers
to process title transactions through the APPS program. Under APPS, a
DMV customer must sign a written agreement with the DMV that includes
security procedures, an account, and a secure logon ID. DMV customers
also must provide the DMV with the names of the individuals authorized
to conduct transactions in APPS. These individuals are issued a secure
logon ID and password that can be traced by the DMV to their
transactions. In addition, APPS vendors must create security protocols
that include an audit journal that can identify each person responsible
for each title transaction. Vendors must also provide the DMV with a
daily report detailing all security violations. Furthermore, Wisconsin
requires motor vehicle dealers to retain copies of electronic titles
for motor vehicles owned and offered for sale and odometer statements
received and given for a period of 5 years.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ Wisconsin indicates that its e-Odometer system will permit
motor vehicle dealers the ability to retain copies of all odometer
disclosure statements received or given by the dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For individuals not using APPS, the identity verification
procedures require the establishment of electronic signatures of the
parties. Due to the system's procedures for validating and
authenticating the electronic signature of each individual through
DMV's database, the electronic signatures of the transferor and
transferee are reliable, readily detectable and can easily be linked to
particular individuals.\19\ Because the electronic signature consists
of data elements such as the name, address, date of birth, product
number, driver license or identification card number, and a Federal
Employer Identification Number or the last four or five digits of the
individual's Social Security number, Wisconsin's e-Odometer system can
validate and authenticate individual electronic signatures. This
authentication process also allows Wisconsin to trace the individuals
involved in the transaction. This capacity maintains the purposes of
creating a paper trail since the Wisconsin system will have a history
of each vehicle's title transfer and odometer disclosure. These
electronic records will create the electronic equivalent to a paper
based system that will be readily available to law enforcement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ Electronic signatures are generally valid under applicable
law. Congress recognized the growing importance of electronic
signatures in interstate commerce when it enacted the Electronic
Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (E-Sign). See Public
Law 106-229, 114 Stat. 464 (2000). E-Sign established a general rule
of validity for electronic records and electronic signatures. 15
U.S.C. 7001. It also encourages the use of electronic signatures in
commerce, both in private transactions and transactions involving
the Federal government. 15 U.S.C. 7031(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
TIMA's overall purpose is to protect consumers by assuring that
they receive valid odometer disclosures representing a vehicle's actual
mileage at the time of transfer. Here, the alternate disclosure
requirements of Wisconsin's program include characteristics that will
assure that representations of a vehicle's actual mileage will be as
valid as those found in current paper title transfers. Identity
authentication, maintenance in a secure electronic environment, and
transferee verification of the mileage data reported by the transferor
all help to ensure valid disclosures. In addition, by providing rapid
access to records of past transfers and by maintaining audit logs of
each and every title transfer transaction, the Wisconsin program could
potentially provide a superior deterrent to odometer fraud.
Furthermore, Wisconsin's program offers the public the opportunity to
view the most recent odometer reading and date of that reading through
an Internet application. A prospective purchaser can access the public
e-Odometer information to assess a vehicle's true value by comparing
the vehicle's current odometer reading to the electronic record stored
with the DMV.
As discussed above, NHTSA has not approved Wisconsin's plan insofar
as it concerns leased vehicles. That program is under development. We
recognize that while, in general, the AALA supported the Wisconsin
petition, in its comments to the Initial Determination the AALA raised
several concerns. The organization stated that Wisconsin's program
should address interstate transactions. The AALA's comments also
contended that requiring lessors to retain lessee odometer statements
is unnecessary since these statements will be retained in Wisconsin's
e-Odometer system. The AALA further contended that lessees should be
allowed to fill out odometer statements electronically and that the
Secretary should make clear that this practice is allowed. In the
AALA's view, lessors should also be able to electronically submit their
own odometer value when a lessee does not submit an odometer statement
and the lessor is confident that it can provide a valid odometer
reading. The AALA also requested that Wisconsin's system allow lessors
to issue odometer statements that will be verified by purchasers to
account for any miles accrued during the resale process. The
organization added that lessors should be allowed to issue disclosure
statements where
[[Page 1375]]
multiple or amended statements are needed to ensure accurate reporting
when leased vehicles are purchased by lessees or a lessee's employee
but no third-party reseller is involved. Finally, the AALA stated that
Wisconsin's proposal should state clearly that the lessee odometer
disclosure statement may be provided by the driver. Since this notice
does not resolve the leased vehicle part of Wisconsin's program, we are
not addressing AALA's comments. If Wisconsin resubmits a petition
regarding leased vehicles, the AALA will have an opportunity to comment
on it.
For the foregoing reasons, and upon review of the entire record,
NHTSA hereby issues a final determination granting Wisconsin's petition
for requirements that apply in lieu of the Federal requirements adopted
under section 408(d) of the Cost Savings Act, other than the portions
of the petition addressing transfer of leased vehicles, which Wisconsin
indicates in its comments will be addressed in a separate petition.
Other requirements of the Cost Savings Act continue to apply in
Wisconsin. NHTSA reserves the right to rescind this determination in
the event that future information indicates that the operation of
Wisconsin's alternative disclosure system does not satisfy one or more
applicable requirements.
Issued on: January 4, 2011.
David L. Strickland,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2011-148 Filed 1-7-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P