Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of the Expedited Third Five-Year (Sunset) Review of the Antidumping Duty Order, 1135-1136 [2011-145]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 5 / Friday, January 7, 2011 / Notices
review interested parties’ case and
rebuttal briefs after setting a submission
deadline, and conduct the public
hearing that was requested by interested
parties, we have determined that it is
not practicable to complete this review
within the 120 days specified under the
Act. Therefore, we are extending the
time for the completion of the final
results of this review by 60 days to May
8, 2011.1
This notice is published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: January 3, 2011.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2011–143 Filed 1–6–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–933]
Frontseating Service Valves From the
People’s Republic of China: Extension
of Time for the Preliminary Results of
the Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: January 7, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Laurel LaCivita, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 8, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–4243.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
Background
On May 28, 2010, the Department of
Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) published
in the Federal Register a notice of
initiation of an administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on
frontseating service valves for Zhejiang
Sanhua Co., Ltd. and Zhejiang DunAn
Hetian Metal Co., Ltd. for the period
October 22, 2008, through March 31,
2010.1 Currently, the preliminary results
1 Department practice dictates that where a
deadline falls on a weekend, the appropriate
deadline is the next business day. See Notice of
Clarification: Application of ‘‘Next Business Day’’
Rule for Administrative Determination Deadlines
Pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, As Amended, 70
FR 24533 (May 10, 2005). Therefore, the final
results of this review will be due on May 9, 2011.
1 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 75 FR
29976 (May 28, 2010).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:30 Jan 06, 2011
Jkt 223001
of review are due no later than
December 31, 2010. Because December
31, 2010, falls on a Federal holiday, a
non-business day, the deadline for the
preliminary results reverts to January 3,
2011, the next business day following
the Federal holiday.2
Extension of Time Limit of Preliminary
Results
Pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the
Act’’), the Department shall make a
preliminary determination in an
administrative review of an
antidumping duty order within 245
days after the last day of the anniversary
month of the date of publication of the
order. The Act further provides,
however, that the Department may
extend that 245-day period to 365 days
if it determines it is not practicable to
complete the review within the
foregoing time period.
We determine that completion of the
preliminary results of this review within
the 245-day period is not practicable
because the Department requires
additional time to analyze information
pertaining to the respondent’s sales
practices, factors of production, and to
issue and review responses to
supplemental questionnaires. Therefore,
we require additional time to complete
these preliminary results. As a result, in
accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of
the Act, the Department is extending the
time period for completion of the
preliminary results of this review by 120
days until April 30, 2011. However,
April 30, 2011, falls on a weekend, and
it is the Department’s long-standing
practice to issue a determination on the
next business day when the statutory
deadline falls on a weekend.3
Accordingly, the deadline for
completion of the preliminary results of
the review is now no later than May 2,
2011.
This notice is published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(3)(A)
and 777(i) of the Act.
Dated: December 30, 2010.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2011–62 Filed 1–6–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
2 See Notice of Clarification: Application of ‘‘Next
Business Day’’ Rule for Administrative
Determination Deadlines Pursuant to the Tariff Act
of 1930, As Amended, 70 FR 24533 (May 10, 2005)
(‘‘Next Business Day Rule’’).
3 See Next Business Day Rule.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1135
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–580–807]
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film,
Sheet, and Strip From the Republic of
Korea: Final Results of the Expedited
Third Five-Year (Sunset) Review of the
Antidumping Duty Order
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On September 1, 2010, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) initiated the third sunset
review of the antidumping duty order
on polyethylene terephthalate film,
sheet, and strip from the Republic of
Korea, pursuant to section 751(c) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
The Department has conducted an
expedited (120-day) sunset review
pursuant to 19 CFR
351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2). As a result of this
sunset review, the Department finds that
revocation of the antidumping duty
order would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of dumping
at the levels indicated in the ‘‘Final
Results of Review’’ section of this notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Contact Tyler Weinhold or Robert
James, AD/CVD Operations, Office 7,
Import Administration, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department
of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1121, or
(202) 482–0649, respectively.
AGENCY:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
Background
On September 1, 2010, the
Department initiated the third sunset
review of the antidumping duty order
on polyethylene terephthalate film,
sheet, and strip from the Republic of
Korea, pursuant to section 751(c) of the
Act. See Initiation of Five-Year
(‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 75 FR 53664
(September 1, 2010) (Notice of
Initiation).
The Department received a notice of
intent to participate from DuPont Teijin
Films, Mitsubishi Polyester Film, Inc.,
SKC, Inc., and Toray Plastics (America),
Inc. (collectively, ‘‘petitioners’’ or
‘‘domestic interested parties’’), within
the deadline specified in 19 CFR
351.218(d)(1)(i). The petitioners claimed
domestic interested party status under
section 771(9)(C) of the Act stating that
they are producers in the United States
of a domestic like product.
The Department received a response
to the Notice of Initiation from the
E:\FR\FM\07JAN1.SGM
07JAN1
1136
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 5 / Friday, January 7, 2011 / Notices
domestic interested parties on October
1, 2010, within the 30-day deadline
specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). On
October 20, 2010, the domestic
interested parties submitted a correction
to their response, correcting certain
inaccuracies. We received no
substantive responses from respondent
interested parties. We determined the
response of the domestic interested
parties to be an adequate substantive
response in accordance with 19 CFR
351.218(d)(3). As a result, pursuant to
section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the
Department conducted an expedited
(120-day) sunset review of the
antidumping duty order on
polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet,
and strip from the Republic of Korea.
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
Scope of the Order
Imports covered by the order are
shipments of all gauges of raw,
pretreated, or primed polyethylene
terephthalate film, sheet, and strip,
whether extruded or coextruded. The
films excluded from this review are
metallized films and other finished
films that have had at least one of their
surfaces modified by the application of
a performance-enhancing resinous or
inorganic layer more than 0.00001
inches (0.254 micrometers) thick.
Polyethylene terephthalate film,
sheet, and strip is currently classifiable
under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of
the United States (HTSUS) subheading
3920.62.00. The HTSUS subheading is
provided for convenience and for
customs purposes. The written
description remains dispositive as to the
scope of the product coverage.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in this sunset review
are addressed in ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results of
Expedited Third Sunset Review of the
Antidumping Duty Order on
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet,
and Strip from the Republic of Korea’’
from Edward C. Yang, Acting Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations, to
Ronald K. Lorentzen, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Import Administration
(Issues and Decision Memorandum),
which is hereby adopted by, and issued
concurrently with, this notice. The
issues discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum are the
likelihood of continuation or recurrence
of dumping and the magnitude of the
margins likely to prevail if the order was
revoked. Parties can find a complete
discussion of all issues raised in this
review and the corresponding
recommendations in this public
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:30 Jan 06, 2011
Jkt 223001
memorandum which is on file in the
Central Records Unit, room 7046 of the
main Commerce Department building.
In addition, a complete version of the
Issues and Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly on the Web at
https://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper copy
and electronic version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum are identical in
content.
Final Results of Review
We determine that revocation of the
antidumping duty order on
polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet
and strip from the Republic of Korea
would be likely to lead to continuation
or recurrence of dumping at the
following weighted-average percentage
margins:
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Institute of Standards and
Technology
Electroshock Weapons Test and
Measurement Workshop
National Institute of Standards
and Technology (NIST), United States
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of public meeting.
AGENCY:
NIST invites stakeholders
(manufacturers, law enforcement,
corrections, academia, military, test
instrument manufacturers, etc.) of
electroshock weapons that provide
stand-off delivery of an electric shock to
attend a public meeting. The purpose of
the meeting is to discuss the need for
standardized methods of testing the
Weightedproper operation and performance of
Manufacturers/Exporters/
average
ESWs as well as other issues important
Producers
margin
to the stakeholder community.
(percent)
Attendance is limited to 45 and
SKC Limited ..............................
13.92 registration will be conducted on a firstAll Others ..................................
21.50 come first-served basis.
Teleconferencing will also be available
and also requires pre-registration.
These dumping margins are from the
DATES: The public meeting will be held
Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigation, as
on Friday, 21 January 2011 from 0900 to
amended pursuant to remand in E.I.
1700.
Dupont de Nemours & Co., Inc. v.
United States, 954 F. Supp. 263 (CIT
ADDRESSES: The public meeting will be
1997). See Polyethylene Terephthalate
held at NIST, 100 Bureau Drive,
Film, Sheet, and Strip From the
Gaithersburg, MD. Information on
Republic of Korea; Notice of Final Court accommodations, location, and travel
Decision and Amended Final
can be found at: https://www.nist.gov/
Determination of Antidumping Duty
public_affairs/visitor/visitor.htm. Please
Investigation, 62 FR 50557 (September
note admittance and teleconference
26, 1997).
participation instructions under the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
Notification to Interested Parties
this notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
This notice also serves as the only
Cindy Stanley at 301–975–2756 or by ereminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of mail at cindy.stanley@nist.gov.
their responsibility concerning the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: To
return or destruction of proprietary
support the development of rigorous
information disclosed under APO in
performance requirements for
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305.
electroshock weapons, the Law
Timely notification of the return or
Enforcement Standards Office (OLES) at
destruction of APO materials or
NIST has developed methods to
conversion to judicial protective orders
measure the current and high-voltage
is hereby requested. Failure to comply
output of these weapons, to calibrate
with the regulations and terms of an
these measurement methods, and to
APO is a violation which is subject to
compute measurement uncertainties.
sanction.
All visitors to the NIST site are
required to pre-register to be admitted.
We are issuing and publishing the
Anyone wishing to attend this meeting
results and notice in accordance with
must register by close of business
sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of
Friday, 14 January 2011. Please contact
the Act.
Cindy Stanley with your interest to
Dated: December 29, 2010.
participate and, pending availability of
Edward C. Yang,
space, she will provide you with
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
instructions for admittance. Non-U.S.
Administration.
citizens must also complete form NIST
[FR Doc. 2011–145 Filed 1–6–11; 8:45 am]
1260, which can be requested from
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Cindy Stanley. Cindy Stanley’s e-mail
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\07JAN1.SGM
07JAN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 5 (Friday, January 7, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1135-1136]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-145]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-580-807]
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From the
Republic of Korea: Final Results of the Expedited Third Five-Year
(Sunset) Review of the Antidumping Duty Order
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On September 1, 2010, the Department of Commerce (the
Department) initiated the third sunset review of the antidumping duty
order on polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, and strip from the
Republic of Korea, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act). The Department has conducted an expedited
(120-day) sunset review pursuant to 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2). As
a result of this sunset review, the Department finds that revocation of
the antidumping duty order would be likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of dumping at the levels indicated in the ``Final Results of
Review'' section of this notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Contact Tyler Weinhold or Robert
James, AD/CVD Operations, Office 7, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482-1121, or (202) 482-0649, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
Background
On September 1, 2010, the Department initiated the third sunset
review of the antidumping duty order on polyethylene terephthalate
film, sheet, and strip from the Republic of Korea, pursuant to section
751(c) of the Act. See Initiation of Five-Year (``Sunset'') Review, 75
FR 53664 (September 1, 2010) (Notice of Initiation).
The Department received a notice of intent to participate from
DuPont Teijin Films, Mitsubishi Polyester Film, Inc., SKC, Inc., and
Toray Plastics (America), Inc. (collectively, ``petitioners'' or
``domestic interested parties''), within the deadline specified in 19
CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i). The petitioners claimed domestic interested party
status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act stating that they are
producers in the United States of a domestic like product.
The Department received a response to the Notice of Initiation from
the
[[Page 1136]]
domestic interested parties on October 1, 2010, within the 30-day
deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). On October 20, 2010, the
domestic interested parties submitted a correction to their response,
correcting certain inaccuracies. We received no substantive responses
from respondent interested parties. We determined the response of the
domestic interested parties to be an adequate substantive response in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3). As a result, pursuant to section
751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the
Department conducted an expedited (120-day) sunset review of the
antidumping duty order on polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, and
strip from the Republic of Korea.
Scope of the Order
Imports covered by the order are shipments of all gauges of raw,
pretreated, or primed polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, and
strip, whether extruded or coextruded. The films excluded from this
review are metallized films and other finished films that have had at
least one of their surfaces modified by the application of a
performance-enhancing resinous or inorganic layer more than 0.00001
inches (0.254 micrometers) thick.
Polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, and strip is currently
classifiable under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS) subheading 3920.62.00. The HTSUS subheading is provided for
convenience and for customs purposes. The written description remains
dispositive as to the scope of the product coverage.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in this sunset review are addressed in ``Issues
and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of Expedited Third Sunset
Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Polyethylene Terephthalate
Film, Sheet, and Strip from the Republic of Korea'' from Edward C.
Yang, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations, to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration (Issues and Decision
Memorandum), which is hereby adopted by, and issued concurrently with,
this notice. The issues discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
are the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping and the
magnitude of the margins likely to prevail if the order was revoked.
Parties can find a complete discussion of all issues raised in this
review and the corresponding recommendations in this public memorandum
which is on file in the Central Records Unit, room 7046 of the main
Commerce Department building. In addition, a complete version of the
Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Web at
https://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper copy and electronic version of the
Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
Final Results of Review
We determine that revocation of the antidumping duty order on
polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet and strip from the Republic of
Korea would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping
at the following weighted-average percentage margins:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Manufacturers/Exporters/ Producers margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SKC Limited................................................ 13.92
All Others................................................. 21.50
------------------------------------------------------------------------
These dumping margins are from the Less-Than-Fair-Value
Investigation, as amended pursuant to remand in E.I. Dupont de Nemours
& Co., Inc. v. United States, 954 F. Supp. 263 (CIT 1997). See
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From the Republic of
Korea; Notice of Final Court Decision and Amended Final Determination
of Antidumping Duty Investigation, 62 FR 50557 (September 26, 1997).
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective orders is hereby requested. Failure
to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which
is subject to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing the results and notice in accordance
with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: December 29, 2010.
Edward C. Yang,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011-145 Filed 1-6-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
