Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review, 90-92 [2010-33123]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
90
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 1 / Monday, January 3, 2011 / Notices
DOC Case no.
ITC Case no.
Country
Product
Department
contact
A–570–826 ......................
731–TA–663 ..........................
PRC .........
Paper Clips (3rd Review) .......................................
A–403–801 ......................
731–TA–454 ..........................
Norway ....
Fresh and Chilled Atlantic Salmon (3rd Review) ...
C–403–802 ......................
701–TA–302 ..........................
Norway ....
Fresh and Chilled Atlantic Salmon (3rd Review) ...
Jennifer Moats
(202) 482–
5047.
David Goldberger
(202) 482–
4136.
David Goldberger
(202) 482–
4136.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Filing Information
As a courtesy, we are making
information related to Sunset
proceedings, including copies of the
pertinent statute and Department’s
regulations, the Department schedule
for Sunset Reviews, a listing of past
revocations and continuations, and
current service lists, available to the
public on the Department’s Internet
Web site at the following address:
https://ia.ita.doc.gov/sunset/. All
submissions in these Sunset Reviews
must be filed in accordance with the
Department’s regulations regarding
format, translation, service, and
certification of documents. These rules
can be found at 19 CFR 351.303.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103 (d), the
Department will maintain and make
available a service list for these
proceedings. To facilitate the timely
preparation of the service list(s), it is
requested that those seeking recognition
as interested parties to a proceeding
contact the Department in writing
within 10 days of the publication of the
Notice of Initiation.
Because deadlines in Sunset Reviews
can be very short, we urge interested
parties to apply for access to proprietary
information under administrative
protective order (‘‘APO’’) immediately
following publication in the Federal
Register of this notice of initiation by
filing a notice of intent to participate.
The Department’s regulations on
submission of proprietary information
and eligibility to receive access to
business proprietary information under
APO can be found at 19 CFR 351.304–
306.
Information Required From Interested
Parties
Domestic interested parties defined in
section 771(9)(C), (D), (E), (F), and (G) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.102(b)) wishing
to participate in a Sunset Review must
respond not later than 15 days after the
date of publication in the Federal
Register of this notice of initiation by
filing a notice of intent to participate.
See 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i). The
required contents of the notice of intent
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:48 Dec 30, 2010
Jkt 223001
to participate are set forth at 19 CFR
351.218(d)(1)(ii). In accordance with the
Department’s regulations, if we do not
receive a notice of intent to participate
from at least one domestic interested
party by the 15-day deadline, the
Department will automatically revoke
the order without further review. See 19
CFR 351.218(d)(1)(iii).
If we receive an order-specific notice
of intent to participate from a domestic
interested party, the Department’s
regulations provide that all parties
wishing to participate in the Sunset
Review must file complete substantive
responses not later than 30 days after
the date of publication in the Federal
Register of this notice of initiation. The
required contents of a substantive
response, on an order-specific basis, are
set forth at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3). Note
that certain information requirements
differ for respondent and domestic
parties. Also, note that the Department’s
information requirements are distinct
from the Commission’s information
requirements. Please consult the
Department’s regulations for
information regarding the Department’s
conduct of Sunset Reviews.1 Please
consult the Department’s regulations at
19 CFR part 351 for definitions of terms
and for other general information
concerning antidumping and
countervailing duty proceedings at the
Department.
This notice of initiation is being
published in accordance with section
751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218
(c).
Dated: December 20, 2010.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2010–33134 Filed 12–30–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
1 In comments made on the interim final sunset
regulations, a number of parties stated that the
proposed five-day period for rebuttals to
substantive responses to a notice of initiation was
insufficient. This requirement was retained in the
final sunset regulations at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(4). As
provided in 19 CFR 351.302(b), however, the
Department will consider individual requests to
extend that five-day deadline based upon a showing
of good cause.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty
Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation; Opportunity To Request
Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sheila E. Forbes, Office of AD/CVD
Operations, Customs Unit, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230,
telephone: (202) 482–4697.
Background
Each year during the anniversary
month of the publication of an
antidumping or countervailing duty
order, finding, or suspension of
investigation, an interested party, as
defined in section 771(9) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’),
may request, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.213, that the Department of
Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) conduct
an administrative review of that
antidumping or countervailing duty
order, finding, or suspended
investigation.
All deadlines for the submission of
comments or actions by the Department
discussed below refer to the number of
calendar days from the applicable
starting date.
Respondent Selection
In the event the Department limits the
number of respondents for individual
examination for administrative reviews
initiated pursuant to requests made for
the orders identified below, except for
the review of the antidumping duty
order on Wooden Bedroom Furniture
from the People’s Republic of China
(‘‘PRC’’) (A–570–890), the Department
intends to select respondents based on
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(‘‘CBP’’) data for U.S. imports during the
period of review (‘‘POR’’). We intend to
E:\FR\FM\03JAN1.SGM
03JAN1
91
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 1 / Monday, January 3, 2011 / Notices
release the CBP data under
Administrative Protective Order
(‘‘APO’’) to all parties having an APO
within seven days of publication of the
initiation notice and to make our
decision regarding respondent selection
within 21 days of publication of the
initiation Federal Register notice.
Therefore, we encourage all parties
interested in commenting on respondent
selection to submit their APO
applications on the date of publication
of the initiation notice, or as soon
thereafter as possible. The Department
invites comments regarding the CBP
data and respondent selection within
five days of placement of the CBP data
on the record of the review.
If the Department limits the number
of respondents selected for individual
examination in the administrative
review of the antidumping duty order
on wooden bedroom furniture from the
PRC, it intends to select respondents
based on volume data contained in
responses to quantity and value
questionnaires. Further, the Department
intends to limit the number of quantity
and value questionnaires issued in the
wooden bedroom furniture from the
PRC review based on CBP data for U.S.
imports classified under the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) headings
identified in the scope of the order.
Since the units used to measure import
quantities are not consistent for the
HTSUS headings identified in the scope
of the order on wooden bedroom
furniture from the PRC, the Department
will limit the number of quantity and
value questionnaires issued based on
the import values in CBP data as a proxy
for import quantities. Parties subject to
the review to which the Department
does not send a quantity and value
questionnaire may file a response to the
quantity and value questionnaire by the
applicable deadline if they desire to be
included in the pool of companies from
which the Department will select
mandatory respondents. Additionally,
exporters subject to the review to which
the Department does not send a quantity
and value questionnaire may file a
separate rate application or separate rate
certification, as appropriate, by the
applicable deadline without filing a
response to the quantity and value
questionnaire.
Opportunity to Request A Review: Not
later than the last day of January 2011,1
interested parties may request
administrative review of the following
orders, findings, or suspended
investigations, with anniversary dates in
January for the following periods:
Period to be reviewed
Antidumping Duty Proceedings
Brazil: Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand ...................................................................
India: Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand ....................................................................
Mexico: Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand .................................................................
South Africa: Ferrovanadium .................................................................................................
South Korea:
Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand .......................................................................
Top-of-the Stove Stainless Steel Cooking Ware2 ..........................................................
Thailand: Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand ..............................................................
The People’s Republic of China:
Crepe Paper Products ....................................................................................................
Ferrovanadium ................................................................................................................
Folding Gift Boxes ..........................................................................................................
Potassium Permanganate ..............................................................................................
Wooden Bedroom Furniture ...........................................................................................
Countervailing Duty Proceedings
South Korea: Top-of-the-Stove Stainless Steel Cooking Ware 3 ..........................................
The People’s Republic of China: Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods .................................
Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Line Pipe ...........................................................
Suspension Agreements
Mexico: Fresh Tomatoes .......................................................................................................
Russia: Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate ...............................................................
A–351–837
A–533–828
A–201–831
A–791–815
1/1/10—12/31/10
1/1/10—12/31/10
1/1/10—12/31/10
1/1/10—12/31/10
A–580–852
A–580–601
A–549–820
1/1/10—12/31/10
1/1/10—11/16/10
1/1/10—12/31/10
A–570–895
A–570–873
A–570–866
A–570–001
A–570–890
1/1/10—12/31/10
1/1/10—12/31/10
1/1/10—12/31/10
1/1/10—12/31/10
1/1/10—12/31/10
C–580–602
C–570–944
C–570–936
1/1/10—11/21/10
1/20/10—12/31/10
1/1/10—12/31/10
A–201–820
A–821–808
1/1/10—12/31/10
1/1/10—12/31/10
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
2 The antidumping duty order on Top-of-the Stove Stainless Steel Cooking Ware was revoked due to sunset review effective November 17,
2010.
3 The countervailing duty order on Top-of-the Stove Stainless Steel Cooking Ware was revoked due to sunset review effective November 22,
2010.
In accordance with 19 CFR
351.213(b), an interested party as
defined by section 771(9) of the Act may
request in writing that the Secretary
conduct an administrative review. For
both antidumping and countervailing
duty reviews, the interested party must
specify the individual producers or
exporters covered by an antidumping
finding or an antidumping or
countervailing duty order or suspension
agreement for which it is requesting a
review. In addition, a domestic
interested party or an interested party
described in section 771(9)(B) of the Act
must state why it desires the Secretary
to review those particular producers or
exporters.4 If the interested party
intends for the Secretary to review sales
of merchandise by an exporter (or a
producer if that producer also exports
merchandise from other suppliers)
which were produced in more than one
country of origin and each country of
origin is subject to a separate order, then
the interested party must state
specifically, on an order-by-order basis,
which exporter(s) the request is
intended to cover.
Please note that, for any party the
Department was unable to locate in
prior segments, the Department will not
accept a request for an administrative
review of that party absent new
information as to the party’s location.
Moreover, if the interested party who
1 Or the next business day, if the deadline falls
on a weekend, Federal holiday or any other day
when the Department is closed.
4 If the review request involves a non-market
economy and the parties subject to the review
request do not qualify for separate rates, all other
exporters of subject merchandise from the non-
market economy country who do not have a
separate rate will be covered by the review as part
of the single entity of which the named firms are
a part.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:48 Dec 30, 2010
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\03JAN1.SGM
03JAN1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
92
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 1 / Monday, January 3, 2011 / Notices
files a request for review is unable to
locate the producer or exporter for
which it requested the review, the
interested party must provide an
explanation of the attempts it made to
locate the producer or exporter at the
same time it files its request for review,
in order for the Secretary to determine
if the interested party’s attempts were
reasonable, pursuant to 19 CFR
351.303(f)(3)(ii).
As explained in Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003), the Department
has clarified its practice with respect to
the collection of final antidumping
duties on imports of merchandise where
intermediate firms are involved. The
public should be aware of this
clarification in determining whether to
request an administrative review of
merchandise subject to antidumping
findings and orders. See also the Import
Administration Web site at https://
ia.ita.doc.gov.
Six copies of the request should be
submitted to the Assistant Secretary for
Import Administration, International
Trade Administration, Room 1870, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 14th Street
and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230. The Department
also asks parties to serve a copy of their
requests to the Office of Antidumping/
Countervailing Operations, Attention:
Sheila Forbes, in room 3508 of the main
Commerce Building. Further, in
accordance with 19 CFR
351.303(f)(3)(ii), a copy of each request
must be served on the petitioner and
each exporter or producer specified in
the request.
The Department will publish in the
Federal Register a notice of ‘‘Initiation
of Administrative Review of
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty
Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation’’ for requests received by
the last day of January 2011. If the
Department does not receive, by the last
day of January 2011, a request for
review of entries covered by an order,
finding, or suspended investigation
listed in this notice and for the period
identified above, the Department will
instruct the CBP to assess antidumping
or countervailing duties on those entries
at a rate equal to the cash deposit of (or
bond for) estimated antidumping or
countervailing duties required on those
entries at the time of entry, or
withdrawal from warehouse, for
consumption and to continue to collect
the cash deposit previously ordered.
For the first administrative review of
any order, there will be no assessment
of antidumping or countervailing duties
on entries of subject merchandise
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:48 Dec 30, 2010
Jkt 223001
necessary to make the preliminary
determination because the case is
extraordinarily complicated. The
Department solicited and received
comments from parties, and concludes
that concerned parties are cooperating.
The Department further finds that
additional time is required because the
Dated: December 20, 2010.
number of alleged manufacturers,
producers, and exporters listed in the
Christian Marsh,
Petition 1 has complicated the
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
Department’s selection of the firms to
individually investigate. See section
[FR Doc. 2010–33123 Filed 12–30–10; 8:45 am]
703(c)(1)(B)(i)(IV) of the Act.
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Moreover, since the Initiation Notice,
the Department has concluded it cannot
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
use U.S. Customs and Border Protection
data for respondent selection. Rather, it
International Trade Administration
is appropriate to solicit information
[C–570–971]
about the quantity and value of subject
merchandise sales from the firms named
Multilayered Wood Flooring From the
in the Petition. Therefore, respondent
People’s Republic of China:
selection is extraordinarily complicated
Postponement of Preliminary
due to the large number of companies
Determination in the Countervailing
from which the Department is gathering
Duty Investigation
quantity and value information. Thus,
AGENCY: Import Administration,
the Department is extending the due
International Trade Administration,
date for the preliminary determination
Department of Commerce.
to no later than 130 days after the day
DATES: Effective Date: January 3, 2011.
on which the investigation was initiated
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Seth (i.e., March 20, 2011). However, March
Isenberg and Joshua Morris, AD/CVD
20, 2011, falls on a Sunday, and it is the
Operations, Import Administration,
Department’s long-standing practice to
International Trade Administration,
issue a determination the next business
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
day when the statutory deadline falls on
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
a weekend, Federal holiday, or any
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) other day when the Department is
482–0588 and (202) 482–1779,
closed. See Notice of Clarification:
respectively.
Application of ‘‘Next Business Day’’ Rule
for Administrative Determination
Background
Deadlines Pursuant to the Tariff Act of
On November 10, 2010, the
1930, As Amended, 70 FR 24533 (May
Department of Commerce (‘‘the
10, 2005). Accordingly, the deadline for
Department’’) initiated an investigation
completion of the preliminary
of multilayered wood flooring from the
People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’). See determination is now no later than
Monday, March 21, 2011.
Multilayered Wood Flooring From the
People’s Republic of China: Initiation of
This notice is issued and published
Countervailing Duty Investigation, 75 FR pursuant to section 703(c)(2) of the Act
70719 (November 18, 2010) (‘‘Initiation
and 19 CFR 351.205(f).
Notice’’). Currently, the preliminary
Dated: December 27, 2010.
determination is due no later than
Christian Marsh,
January 14, 2011.
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption during the relevant
provisional-measures ‘‘gap’’ period, of
the order, if such a gap period is
applicable to the POR.
This notice is not required by statute
but is published as a service to the
international trading community.
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
Postponement of Due Date for
Preliminary Determination
[FR Doc. 2010–33133 Filed 12–30–10; 8:45 am]
Under section 703(c)(1)(B) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
‘‘Act’’), the Department may extend the
period for reaching a preliminary
determination in a countervailing duty
investigation until no later than the
130th day after the date on which the
administering authority initiates an
investigation, if the Department
determines that the parties are
cooperating and additional time is
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
1 See Petition for the Imposition of Antidumping
and Countervailing Duties: Multilayered Wood
Flooring from the People’s Republic of China, dated
October 21, 2010 (‘‘Petition’’).
E:\FR\FM\03JAN1.SGM
03JAN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 1 (Monday, January 3, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 90-92]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-33123]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sheila E. Forbes, Office of AD/CVD
Operations, Customs Unit, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482-
4697.
Background
Each year during the anniversary month of the publication of an
antidumping or countervailing duty order, finding, or suspension of
investigation, an interested party, as defined in section 771(9) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act''), may request, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.213, that the Department of Commerce (``the
Department'') conduct an administrative review of that antidumping or
countervailing duty order, finding, or suspended investigation.
All deadlines for the submission of comments or actions by the
Department discussed below refer to the number of calendar days from
the applicable starting date.
Respondent Selection
In the event the Department limits the number of respondents for
individual examination for administrative reviews initiated pursuant to
requests made for the orders identified below, except for the review of
the antidumping duty order on Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the
People's Republic of China (``PRC'') (A-570-890), the Department
intends to select respondents based on U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (``CBP'') data for U.S. imports during the period of review
(``POR''). We intend to
[[Page 91]]
release the CBP data under Administrative Protective Order (``APO'') to
all parties having an APO within seven days of publication of the
initiation notice and to make our decision regarding respondent
selection within 21 days of publication of the initiation Federal
Register notice. Therefore, we encourage all parties interested in
commenting on respondent selection to submit their APO applications on
the date of publication of the initiation notice, or as soon thereafter
as possible. The Department invites comments regarding the CBP data and
respondent selection within five days of placement of the CBP data on
the record of the review.
If the Department limits the number of respondents selected for
individual examination in the administrative review of the antidumping
duty order on wooden bedroom furniture from the PRC, it intends to
select respondents based on volume data contained in responses to
quantity and value questionnaires. Further, the Department intends to
limit the number of quantity and value questionnaires issued in the
wooden bedroom furniture from the PRC review based on CBP data for U.S.
imports classified under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United
States (``HTSUS'') headings identified in the scope of the order. Since
the units used to measure import quantities are not consistent for the
HTSUS headings identified in the scope of the order on wooden bedroom
furniture from the PRC, the Department will limit the number of
quantity and value questionnaires issued based on the import values in
CBP data as a proxy for import quantities. Parties subject to the
review to which the Department does not send a quantity and value
questionnaire may file a response to the quantity and value
questionnaire by the applicable deadline if they desire to be included
in the pool of companies from which the Department will select
mandatory respondents. Additionally, exporters subject to the review to
which the Department does not send a quantity and value questionnaire
may file a separate rate application or separate rate certification, as
appropriate, by the applicable deadline without filing a response to
the quantity and value questionnaire.
Opportunity to Request A Review: Not later than the last day of
January 2011,\1\ interested parties may request administrative review
of the following orders, findings, or suspended investigations, with
anniversary dates in January for the following periods:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Or the next business day, if the deadline falls on a
weekend, Federal holiday or any other day when the Department is
closed.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Period to be reviewed
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Antidumping Duty Proceedings
Brazil: Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand................ A-351-837 1/1/10--12/31/10
India: Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand................. A-533-828 1/1/10--12/31/10
Mexico: Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand................ A-201-831 1/1/10--12/31/10
South Africa: Ferrovanadium................................... A-791-815 1/1/10--12/31/10
South Korea:
Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand.................... A-580-852 1/1/10--12/31/10
Top-of-the Stove Stainless Steel Cooking Ware\2\.......... A-580-601 1/1/10--11/16/10
Thailand: Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand.............. A-549-820 1/1/10--12/31/10
The People's Republic of China:
Crepe Paper Products...................................... A-570-895 1/1/10--12/31/10
Ferrovanadium............................................. A-570-873 1/1/10--12/31/10
Folding Gift Boxes........................................ A-570-866 1/1/10--12/31/10
Potassium Permanganate................................... A-570-001 1/1/10--12/31/10
Wooden Bedroom Furniture.................................. A-570-890 1/1/10--12/31/10
Countervailing Duty Proceedings
South Korea: Top-of-the-Stove Stainless Steel Cooking Ware \3\ C-580-602 1/1/10--11/21/10
The People's Republic of China: Certain Oil Country Tubular C-570-944 1/20/10--12/31/10
Goods........................................................
Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Line Pipe........... C-570-936 1/1/10--12/31/10
Suspension Agreements
Mexico: Fresh Tomatoes........................................ A-201-820 1/1/10--12/31/10
Russia: Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate.............. A-821-808 1/1/10--12/31/10
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The antidumping duty order on Top-of-the Stove Stainless Steel Cooking Ware was revoked due to sunset review
effective November 17, 2010.
\3\ The countervailing duty order on Top-of-the Stove Stainless Steel Cooking Ware was revoked due to sunset
review effective November 22, 2010.
In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b), an interested party as
defined by section 771(9) of the Act may request in writing that the
Secretary conduct an administrative review. For both antidumping and
countervailing duty reviews, the interested party must specify the
individual producers or exporters covered by an antidumping finding or
an antidumping or countervailing duty order or suspension agreement for
which it is requesting a review. In addition, a domestic interested
party or an interested party described in section 771(9)(B) of the Act
must state why it desires the Secretary to review those particular
producers or exporters.\4\ If the interested party intends for the
Secretary to review sales of merchandise by an exporter (or a producer
if that producer also exports merchandise from other suppliers) which
were produced in more than one country of origin and each country of
origin is subject to a separate order, then the interested party must
state specifically, on an order-by-order basis, which exporter(s) the
request is intended to cover.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ If the review request involves a non-market economy and the
parties subject to the review request do not qualify for separate
rates, all other exporters of subject merchandise from the non-
market economy country who do not have a separate rate will be
covered by the review as part of the single entity of which the
named firms are a part.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please note that, for any party the Department was unable to locate
in prior segments, the Department will not accept a request for an
administrative review of that party absent new information as to the
party's location. Moreover, if the interested party who
[[Page 92]]
files a request for review is unable to locate the producer or exporter
for which it requested the review, the interested party must provide an
explanation of the attempts it made to locate the producer or exporter
at the same time it files its request for review, in order for the
Secretary to determine if the interested party's attempts were
reasonable, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.303(f)(3)(ii).
As explained in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003), the
Department has clarified its practice with respect to the collection of
final antidumping duties on imports of merchandise where intermediate
firms are involved. The public should be aware of this clarification in
determining whether to request an administrative review of merchandise
subject to antidumping findings and orders. See also the Import
Administration Web site at https://ia.ita.doc.gov.
Six copies of the request should be submitted to the Assistant
Secretary for Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, Room 1870, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230. The Department also
asks parties to serve a copy of their requests to the Office of
Antidumping/Countervailing Operations, Attention: Sheila Forbes, in
room 3508 of the main Commerce Building. Further, in accordance with 19
CFR 351.303(f)(3)(ii), a copy of each request must be served on the
petitioner and each exporter or producer specified in the request.
The Department will publish in the Federal Register a notice of
``Initiation of Administrative Review of Antidumping or Countervailing
Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation'' for requests received
by the last day of January 2011. If the Department does not receive, by
the last day of January 2011, a request for review of entries covered
by an order, finding, or suspended investigation listed in this notice
and for the period identified above, the Department will instruct the
CBP to assess antidumping or countervailing duties on those entries at
a rate equal to the cash deposit of (or bond for) estimated antidumping
or countervailing duties required on those entries at the time of
entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption and to continue to
collect the cash deposit previously ordered.
For the first administrative review of any order, there will be no
assessment of antidumping or countervailing duties on entries of
subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption during the relevant provisional-measures ``gap'' period, of
the order, if such a gap period is applicable to the POR.
This notice is not required by statute but is published as a
service to the international trading community.
Dated: December 20, 2010.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2010-33123 Filed 12-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
