Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 82416-82417 [2010-32941]
Download as PDF
82416
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 250 / Thursday, December 30, 2010 / Notices
PEACE CORPS
Proposed Information Collection
Renewals
Submission for Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) review;
comment request.
ACTION:
The Peace Corps has
submitted the following three (3)
information collections to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
extension under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. This
notice invites the public to comment on
the renewal of three information
collections: World Wise Schools
Conference Online Registration Form
(OMB 0420–0541); Speakers Match:
Online Request for a Speaker Form
(OMB 0420–0539); and Correspondence
Match Educator Online Enrollment
Form: Educator Sign Up Form (OMB
0420–0540). Peace Corps invites
comments on whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for proper performance of the functions
of the Peace Corps, including whether
the information will have practical use;
the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of
the burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of
the information to be collected; and
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of automated collection techniques,
when appropriate, and other forms of
information technology.
DATES: Comments regarding this
collection must be received on or before
January 31, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit comments regarding
this proposal. Comments should refer to
the proposal by name/or OMB approval
number and should be sent via e-mail
to: oira_submission@omb.eop.gov or fax
to: 202–395–3086. Attention: Desk
Officer for Peace Corps.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Denora Miller, FOJA Officer, Peace
Corps, 1111 20th Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20526, (202) 692–1236,
or e-mail at pcfr@peacecorps.gov.
Copies of available documents
submitted to OMB may be obtained
from Denora Miller.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Proposal
to renew the following three (3)
information collections currently
approved collection of information:
1. Title: World Wise Schools
Conference—Online Registration Form.
OMB Control Number: 0420–0541.
Type of Review: Regular—extension,
without change, currently approved
collection.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:35 Dec 29, 2010
Jkt 223001
Respondents: Educators and
employees of local governmental and
nongovernmental organizations
interested in promoting global
education in the classroom.
Estimated annual number of
respondents: 300.
Estimated average time to respond: 10
minutes.
Frequency of response: Annually.
Estimated total annual burden hours:
50 hours.
Purpose of collection: The
information collected is used to
officially register attendees to the
annual World Wise Schools Conference.
The information is used as a record of
attendance.
2. Title: Speakers Match: Online
Request for a Speaker Form.
OMB Control Number: 0420–0539.
Type of Review: Regular—extension,
without change, currently approved
collection.
Respondents: Educators interested in
promoting global education in the
classroom.
Estimated annual number of
responses: 300.
Estimated average time to respond: 10
minutes.
Frequency of response: Annually.
Estimated annual burden hours: 50
hours.
Purpose of collection: The
information collected is used to make
suitable matches between the educators
and returned Peace Corps Volunteers for
the Speakers Match program.
3. Title: Correspondence Match
Educator Online Enrollment Form:
Educator Sign Up Form.
OMB Control Number: 0420–0540.
Type of Review: Regular—extension,
without change, currently approved
collection.
Respondents: Educators interested in
promoting global education in the
classroom.
Estimated annual number of
responses: 10,000.
Estimated average time to respond: 10
minutes.
Frequency of response: Annually.
Estimated annual burden hours: 1,667
hours.
Purpose of collection: The
information collected is used to make
suitable matches between the educators
and currently serving Peace Corps
Volunteers.
Dated: December 23, 2010.
Garry W. Stanberry,
Deputy Associate Director for Management.
[FR Doc. 2010–32913 Filed 12–29–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6051–01–M
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request
Upon Written Request, Copies Available
From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Investor
Education and Advocacy,
Washington, DC 20549–0213.
Extension:
Rule 206(3)–3T, SEC File No. 270–571,
OMB Control No. 3235–0630.
Notice is hereby given that, pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 350l et seq.), the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the
‘‘Commission’’) is soliciting comments
on the collections of information
summarized below. The Commission
plans to submit these existing
collections of information to the Office
of Management and Budget (‘‘OMB’’) for
extension and approval.
Temporary rule 206(3)–3T (17 CFR
275.206(3)–3T) under the Investment
Advisers Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80b–1
et seq.) is entitled: ‘‘Temporary rule for
principal trades with certain advisory
clients.’’ The temporary rule provides
investment advisers who are registered
with the Commission as broker-dealers
an alternative means to meet the
requirements of section 206(3) of the
Advisers Act (15 U.S.C. 80b–6(3)) when
they act in a principal capacity in
transactions with certain of their
advisory clients.
Temporary rule 206(3)–3T permits
investment advisers also registered as
broker-dealers to satisfy the Advisers
Act’s principal trading restrictions by:
(i) Providing written, prospective
disclosure regarding the conflicts arising
from principal trades; (ii) obtaining
written, revocable consent from the
client prospectively authorizing the
adviser to enter into principal
transactions; (iii) making oral or written
disclosure and obtaining the client’s
consent before each principal
transaction; (iv) sending to the client
confirmation statements disclosing the
capacity in which the adviser has acted;
and (v) delivering to the client an
annual report itemizing the principal
transactions.
Providing the information required by
rule 206(3)–3T is necessary for
investment advisers also registered as
broker-dealers to obtain the benefit of
the alternative means of complying with
section 206(3) of the Advisers Act.
Disclosures under the rule provide
important investor protections when
advisers engage in principal trades.
Clients of advisers will primarily use
E:\FR\FM\30DEN1.SGM
30DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 250 / Thursday, December 30, 2010 / Notices
the information to monitor principal
trades in their accounts.
The Commission staff estimates that
approximately 380 investment advisers
make use of rule 206(3)–3T, including
an estimated 24 advisers (on an annual
basis) also registered as broker-dealers
who do not offer non-discretionary
services, but whom the Commission
staff estimates will choose to do so and
rely on rule 206(3)–3T. The Commission
staff estimates that these advisers spend,
in the aggregate, approximately 378,992
hours annually in complying with the
requirements of the rule, including both
initial and annual burdens. The
aggregate hour burden, expressed on a
per-eligible-adviser basis, is therefore
approximately 997 hours per eligible
adviser (378,992 hours divided by the
estimated 380 advisers that will rely on
rule 206(3)–3T).
Written comments are invited on:
(a) Whether the collections of
information are necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the
information has practical utility; (b) the
accuracy of the Commission’s estimate
of the burdens of the collections of
information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information collected; and (d) ways to
minimize the burdens of the collections
of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology. Consideration
will be given to comments and
suggestions submitted in writing within
60 days of this publication.
Please direct your written comments
to Thomas Bayer, Director/CIO,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
C/O Remi Pavlik-Simon, 6432 General
Green Way, Alexandria, VA 22312; or
send an e-mail to:
PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov.
Dated: December 27, 2010.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010–32941 Filed 12–29–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–63606; File No. PCAOB
2010–01]
Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board; Order Approving Proposed
Rules on Auditing Standards Related
to the Auditor’s Assessment of and
Response to Risk and Related
Amendments to PCAOB Standards
December 23, 2010.
I. Introduction
On September 15, 2010, the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board
(the ‘‘Board’’ or the ‘‘PCAOB’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) a
notice (the ‘‘Notice’’) of proposed rules
(File No. PCAOB 2010–01) on Auditing
Standards Related to the Auditor’s
Assessment of and Response to Risk and
Related Amendments to PCAOB
Standards. Those eight auditing
standards (hereinafter referred to as
‘‘Risk Assessment Standards’’), which
will supersede six of the Board’s interim
auditing standards, are:
• Auditing Standard (‘‘AS’’) No. 8,
Audit Risk;
• AS No. 9, Audit Planning;
• AS No. 10, Supervision of the Audit
Engagement;
• AS No. 11, Consideration of
Materiality in Planning and Performing
an Audit;
• AS No. 12, Identifying and
Assessing Risks of Material
Misstatement;
• AS No. 13, The Auditor’s Responses
to the Risks of Material Misstatement;
• AS No. 14, Evaluating Audit
Results; and
• AS No. 15, Audit Evidence.
Notice of the proposed rules was
published in the Federal Register on
September 27, 2010.1 The Commission
received two comment letters relating to
the proposed rules. For the reasons
discussed below, the Commission is
granting approval of the proposed rules.
As specified by the Board, the rules are
effective for audits of fiscal years
beginning on or after December 15,
2010.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
II. Description
The Board adopted eight auditing
standards and related amendments that
are designed to benefit investors by
establishing requirements that enhance
the effectiveness of the auditor’s
1 See Release No. 34–62919 (September 15, 2010)
[75 FR 59332 (September 27, 2010)]. The notice
included a 21-day comment period. The comment
period closed on October 18, 2010.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:35 Dec 29, 2010
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
82417
assessment of and response to the risks
of material misstatement in an audit.
Assessing and responding to risks
underlies the entire audit process. The
risk assessment standards that the
PCAOB is replacing were part of the
Board’s interim standards and were in
large part written twenty to thirty years
ago. In adopting the new Risk
Assessment Standards, the Board
intended to build upon and improve the
risk framework that was already
established by the interim standards,
rather than replacing that framework
altogether.
Changes that the Board made to the
interim standards reflect: Improvements
that the PCAOB has observed in the
audit methodologies of many registered
firms; recommendations from academia;
recommendations from the Board’s
Standing Advisory Group (‘‘SAG’’) and
other groups; the adoption of AS No. 5,
An Audit of Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting That is Integrated
with an Audit of Financial Statements;
improvements made to similar risk
assessment standards by other standard
setters (e.g., the International Auditing
and Assurance Standards Board
(‘‘IAASB’’) and the Auditing Standards
Board (‘‘ASB’’) of the American Institute
of Certified Public Accountants); and
observations from the Board’s oversight
activities.
Key changes made to the standards
include an increased emphasis on fraud
risks, an increased emphasis on
disclosures, inclusion of multi-location
audit requirements, an alignment of the
standards with AS No. 5, and inclusion
of a concept of materiality more
specifically grounded to that used in the
Federal securities laws.
III. Discussion
The Commission received two
comment letters: One from Deloitte &
Touche, LLP (‘‘Deloitte’’) and one from
the Center for Capital Markets
Competitiveness of the U.S. Chamber of
Commerce (‘‘CMCC’’). Deloitte
supported approval of the standards,
while expressing certain concerns
largely of a more general nature
regarding the PCAOB’s approach to
standard-setting. The CMCC believed
that the Risk Assessment Standards
should not be approved, but rather sent
back to the PCAOB in order for the
PCAOB to address certain concerns,
most of which also related to the
PCAOB’s overall approach to standardsetting as opposed to the particular
standards at issue.
E:\FR\FM\30DEN1.SGM
30DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 250 (Thursday, December 30, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 82416-82417]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32941]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, Washington, DC
20549-0213.
Extension:
Rule 206(3)-3T, SEC File No. 270-571, OMB Control No. 3235-0630.
Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 350l et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the
collections of information summarized below. The Commission plans to
submit these existing collections of information to the Office of
Management and Budget (``OMB'') for extension and approval.
Temporary rule 206(3)-3T (17 CFR 275.206(3)-3T) under the
Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80b-1 et seq.) is entitled:
``Temporary rule for principal trades with certain advisory clients.''
The temporary rule provides investment advisers who are registered with
the Commission as broker-dealers an alternative means to meet the
requirements of section 206(3) of the Advisers Act (15 U.S.C. 80b-6(3))
when they act in a principal capacity in transactions with certain of
their advisory clients.
Temporary rule 206(3)-3T permits investment advisers also
registered as broker-dealers to satisfy the Advisers Act's principal
trading restrictions by: (i) Providing written, prospective disclosure
regarding the conflicts arising from principal trades; (ii) obtaining
written, revocable consent from the client prospectively authorizing
the adviser to enter into principal transactions; (iii) making oral or
written disclosure and obtaining the client's consent before each
principal transaction; (iv) sending to the client confirmation
statements disclosing the capacity in which the adviser has acted; and
(v) delivering to the client an annual report itemizing the principal
transactions.
Providing the information required by rule 206(3)-3T is necessary
for investment advisers also registered as broker-dealers to obtain the
benefit of the alternative means of complying with section 206(3) of
the Advisers Act. Disclosures under the rule provide important investor
protections when advisers engage in principal trades. Clients of
advisers will primarily use
[[Page 82417]]
the information to monitor principal trades in their accounts.
The Commission staff estimates that approximately 380 investment
advisers make use of rule 206(3)-3T, including an estimated 24 advisers
(on an annual basis) also registered as broker-dealers who do not offer
non-discretionary services, but whom the Commission staff estimates
will choose to do so and rely on rule 206(3)-3T. The Commission staff
estimates that these advisers spend, in the aggregate, approximately
378,992 hours annually in complying with the requirements of the rule,
including both initial and annual burdens. The aggregate hour burden,
expressed on a per-eligible-adviser basis, is therefore approximately
997 hours per eligible adviser (378,992 hours divided by the estimated
380 advisers that will rely on rule 206(3)-3T).
Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the collections of
information are necessary for the proper performance of the functions
of the Commission, including whether the information has practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission's estimate of the burdens
of the collections of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d) ways to
minimize the burdens of the collections of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other
forms of information technology. Consideration will be given to
comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60 days of this
publication.
Please direct your written comments to Thomas Bayer, Director/CIO,
Securities and Exchange Commission, C/O Remi Pavlik-Simon, 6432 General
Green Way, Alexandria, VA 22312; or send an e-mail to: PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov.
Dated: December 27, 2010.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-32941 Filed 12-29-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P