In the Matter of Certain Digital Television Products and Certain Products Containing Same and Methods of Using Same; Enforcement Proceeding; Notice of Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination (Order No. 40) Granting a Motion To Terminate the Enforcement Proceeding; Termination of Proceeding, 80844 [2010-32214]
Download as PDF
80844
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 246 / Thursday, December 23, 2010 / Notices
designate the presiding Administrative
Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondent in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(d)-(e) and 210.13(a), such
responses will be considered by the
Commission if received not later than 20
days after the date of service by the
Commission of the complaint and the
notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of the respondent to file a
timely response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: December 17, 2010.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010–32213 Filed 12–22–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–617]
In the Matter of Certain Digital
Television Products and Certain
Products Containing Same and
Methods of Using Same; Enforcement
Proceeding; Notice of Commission
Decision Not To Review an Initial
Determination (Order No. 40) Granting
a Motion To Terminate the
Enforcement Proceeding; Termination
of Proceeding
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review the presiding administrative law
judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination
granting complainants’ motion to
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:06 Dec 22, 2010
Jkt 223001
withdraw the enforcement complaint in
the above-captioned proceeding, and
has terminated the enforcement
proceeding.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Daniel E. Valencia, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–1999. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on November 15, 2007, based on a
complaint filed by Funai Electric Co.,
Ltd. of Japan and Funai Corporation of
Rutherford, New Jersey (collectively
‘‘Funai’’) against several respondents. 72
FR 64240 (2007). The complaint alleged
violations of Section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C.
1337, in the importation into the United
States, the sale for importation, and the
sale within the United States after
importation of certain digital television
products and certain products
containing same by reason of
infringement of one or more claims of
U.S. Patent Nos. 6,115,074 (‘‘the ‘074
patent’’) and 5,329,369.
On April 10, 2009, the Commission
terminated its investigation with a
finding of violation of Section 337 by
reason of infringement of claims 1, 5,
and 23 of the ‘074 patent. 74 FR 17511
(2009). The Commission issued a
limited exclusion order prohibiting
importation into the United States of
certain digital televisions and certain
products containing the same that are
covered by one or more of claims 1, 5,
and 23 of the ‘074 patent and that are
manufactured abroad by or on behalf of,
or imported by or on behalf of the
respondents in the above referenced
investigation.
On September 11, 2009, the
Commission instituted an enforcement
proceeding based on an enforcement
complaint filed by Funai, alleging that
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
certain respondents violated the
Commission’s limited exclusion order
and cease and desist orders. 74 FR
46793.
On May 26, 2010, the Federal Circuit
issued a decision that reversed certain
Commission findings of infringement by
so-called ‘‘work-around’’ products in the
underlying investigation and ordered
the Commission to take action
consistent with its opinion. See Vizio,
Inc. v. Int’l Trade Comm’n, 605 F.3d
1330 (Fed. Cir. 2010).
On November 23, 2010, Funai moved
to withdraw its enforcement complaint
and terminate the enforcement
proceeding. No party opposed this
motion. The ALJ granted Funai’s motion
and issued the subject initial
determination (‘‘ID’’). No petitions for
review of the ID were filed.
The Commission has determined not
to review the subject ID, and has
terminated the enforcement proceeding.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in Section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in
section 210.42–43 of the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
210.42–43).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: December 17, 2010.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010–32214 Filed 12–22–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms,
and Explosives
[OMB Number 1140–0027]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comments Requested
30-Day Notice of Information
Collection Under Review: User-Limited
Permit (Explosives).
ACTION:
The Department of Justice (DOJ),
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms,
and Explosives (ATF) will be submitting
the following information collection
request to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for review and approval
in accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed
information collection is published to
obtain comments from the public and
affected agencies. This proposed
information collection was previously
published in the Federal Register
Volume 75, Number 201, page 64356 on
E:\FR\FM\23DEN1.SGM
23DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 246 (Thursday, December 23, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 80844]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32214]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-617]
In the Matter of Certain Digital Television Products and Certain
Products Containing Same and Methods of Using Same; Enforcement
Proceeding; Notice of Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial
Determination (Order No. 40) Granting a Motion To Terminate the
Enforcement Proceeding; Termination of Proceeding
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative
law judge's (``ALJ'') initial determination granting complainants'
motion to withdraw the enforcement complaint in the above-captioned
proceeding, and has terminated the enforcement proceeding.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel E. Valencia, Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street,
SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-1999. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are
or will be available for inspection during official business hours
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC
20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at
https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD
terminal on (202) 205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation
on November 15, 2007, based on a complaint filed by Funai Electric Co.,
Ltd. of Japan and Funai Corporation of Rutherford, New Jersey
(collectively ``Funai'') against several respondents. 72 FR 64240
(2007). The complaint alleged violations of Section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United
States after importation of certain digital television products and
certain products containing same by reason of infringement of one or
more claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,115,074 (``the `074 patent'') and
5,329,369.
On April 10, 2009, the Commission terminated its investigation with
a finding of violation of Section 337 by reason of infringement of
claims 1, 5, and 23 of the `074 patent. 74 FR 17511 (2009). The
Commission issued a limited exclusion order prohibiting importation
into the United States of certain digital televisions and certain
products containing the same that are covered by one or more of claims
1, 5, and 23 of the `074 patent and that are manufactured abroad by or
on behalf of, or imported by or on behalf of the respondents in the
above referenced investigation.
On September 11, 2009, the Commission instituted an enforcement
proceeding based on an enforcement complaint filed by Funai, alleging
that certain respondents violated the Commission's limited exclusion
order and cease and desist orders. 74 FR 46793.
On May 26, 2010, the Federal Circuit issued a decision that
reversed certain Commission findings of infringement by so-called
``work-around'' products in the underlying investigation and ordered
the Commission to take action consistent with its opinion. See Vizio,
Inc. v. Int'l Trade Comm'n, 605 F.3d 1330 (Fed. Cir. 2010).
On November 23, 2010, Funai moved to withdraw its enforcement
complaint and terminate the enforcement proceeding. No party opposed
this motion. The ALJ granted Funai's motion and issued the subject
initial determination (``ID''). No petitions for review of the ID were
filed.
The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID, and has
terminated the enforcement proceeding.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in section 210.42-43 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure (19 CFR 210.42-43).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: December 17, 2010.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-32214 Filed 12-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P