Superalloy Degassed Chromium From Japan: Final Results of Sunset Review and Revocation of Antidumping Duty Order, 80457-80458 [2010-32172]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 245 / Wednesday, December 22, 2010 / Notices
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
b. Engage in promotional and
marketing activities and collect
information on trade opportunities in
the Export Markets and distribute such
information to clients;
c. Enter into exclusive and/or nonexclusive licensing and/or sales
agreements with Suppliers for the
export of products and services, and/or
technology rights to Export Markets;
d. Enter into exclusive and/or nonexclusive agreements with distributors
and/or sales representatives in Export
Markets;
e. Allocate export sales or divide
Export Markets among Suppliers for the
sale and/or licensing of products and
services and/or technology rights;
f. Allocate export orders among
Suppliers;
g. Establish the price of products and
services and/or technology rights for
sales and/or licensing in Export
Markets; and
h. Negotiate, enter into, and/or
manage licensing agreements for the
export of technology rights.
2. ARC seeks certification to exchange
information with individual Suppliers
on a one-to-one basis regarding that
Supplier’s inventories and near-term
production schedules in order that the
availability of Products for export can be
determined and effectively coordinated
by ARC with its distributors in Export
Markets.
IV. Terms and Conditions
1. In engaging in Export Trade
Activities and Methods of Operation,
ARC will not intentionally disclose,
directly or indirectly, to any Supplier
any information about any other
Supplier’s costs, production, capacity,
inventories, domestic prices, domestic
sales, or U.S. business plans, strategies,
or methods that is not already generally
available to the trade or public.
2. ARC will comply with requests
made by the Secretary of Commerce on
behalf of the Secretary or the Attorney
General for information or documents
relevant to conduct under the
Certificate. The Secretary of Commerce
will request such information or
documents when either the Attorney
General or the Secretary of Commerce
believes that the information or
documents are required to determine
that the Export Trade, Export Trade
Activities and Methods of Operation of
a person protected by this Certificate of
Review continue to comply with the
standards of section 303(a) of the Act.
Definition
‘‘Supplier’’ means a person who
produces, provides, or sells Products,
Services, and/or Technology Rights.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:24 Dec 21, 2010
Jkt 223001
Dated: December 6, 2010.
Joseph E. Flynn,
Director, Office of Competition and Economic
Analysis.
[FR Doc. 2010–32125 Filed 12–21–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–533–824]
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet
and Strip From India: Extension of
Time Limit for Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty New Shipper
Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: December 22,
2010.
AGENCY:
Elfi
Blum and Toni Page, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–0197 and (202)
482–1398, respectively.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Background
On March 2, 2010, the Department of
Commerce (the Department) initiated a
new shipper review of the antidumping
duty order on polyethylene
terephthalate film, sheet and strip from
India for the period July 1, 2009,
through December 31, 2009. See
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet
and Strip from India: Initiation of
Antidumping Duty and Countervailing
Duty New Shipper Reviews, 75 FR 10758
(March 9, 2010). This new shipper
review covers one producer and
exporter of the subject merchandise to
the United States: SRF Limited. On
August 18, 2010, the Department
extended the deadline for the
preliminary results for this new shipper
review until October 22, 2010. See
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet
and Strip from India: Extension of Time
Limit for Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review,
75 FR 52717 (August 27, 2010) (First
Extension). On October 18, 2010, the
Department decided to further extend
the deadline for the preliminary results
to December 16, 2010. See Polyethylene
Terephthalate Film, Sheet and Strip
From India: Extension of Time Limit for
Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty New Shipper Review, 75 FR 65450
(October 25, 2010) (Second Extension).
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
80457
Extension of Time Limit for the
Preliminary Results
Section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and
19 CFR 351.214(i)(1) require the
Department to issue the preliminary
results of review within 180 days after
the date on which the new shipper
review was initiated, and final results of
the review within 90 days after the date
on which the preliminary results were
issued. However, if the Department
concludes that a new shipper review is
extraordinarily complicated, section
751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.214(i)(2) allow the Department to
extend the 180-day period to 300 days,
and to extend the 90-day period to 150
days. In the First Extension and the
Second Extension, the Department
determined that this new shipper
review is extraordinarily complicated
because of issues pertaining to the bona
fides of the new shipper and SRF
Limited’s reported sales data. See First
Extension, 75 FR at 52717; Second
Extension, 75 FR at 65450. The
Department finds that it needs
additional time to analyze
methodological issues related to SRF
Limited’s reported sales data, and is
fully extending the deadline for
completion of the preliminary results of
this new shipper review, in accordance
with section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.214(i)(2). Accordingly,
the deadline for the completion of the
preliminary results is now December 27,
2010.
This notice is issued and published
pursuant to sections 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) and
777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: December 16, 2010.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2010–32168 Filed 12–21–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–588–866]
Superalloy Degassed Chromium From
Japan: Final Results of Sunset Review
and Revocation of Antidumping Duty
Order
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On November 1, 2010, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) initiated the sunset review
of the antidumping duty order on
superalloy degassed chromium (SDC)
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\22DEN1.SGM
22DEN1
80458
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 245 / Wednesday, December 22, 2010 / Notices
from Japan. See Initiation of Five-Year
(‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 75 FR 67082
(November 1, 2010) (Initiation Notice).
Because no domestic interested party
responded to the notice of initiation of
the sunset review by the applicable
deadline, the Department is revoking
the antidumping duty order on SDC
from Japan.
DATES: Effective Date: December 22,
2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jerrold Freeman at (202) 482–0180 or
Minoo Hatten at (202) 482–1690, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 5, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Background
On December 22, 2005, the
Department published in the Federal
Register the antidumping duty order on
SDC from Japan. See Antidumping Duty
Order: Superalloy Degassed Chromium
from Japan, 70 FR 76030 (December 22,
2005).
On November 1, 2010, the Department
initiated a sunset review of the
antidumping duty order on SDC from
Japan pursuant to section 751(c) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
See Initiation Notice. We received no
response to the notice of initiation from
domestic interested parties by the
applicable deadline date. See 19 CFR
351.218(d)(1)(i). As a result, the
Department has concluded that no
domestic party intends to participate in
the sunset review. See 19 CFR
351.218(d)(1)(iii)(A). On November 22,
2010, we notified the International
Trade Commission, in writing, that we
intend to revoke the antidumping duty
order on SDC from Japan. See 19 CFR
351.218(d)(1)(iii)(B)(2).
Scope of the Order
The product covered by the order is
all forms, sizes, and grades of SDC from
Japan. SDC is a high-purity form of
chrome metal that generally contains at
least 99.5 percent, but less than 99.95
percent, chromium. SDC contains very
low levels of certain gaseous elements
and other impurities (typically no more
than 0.005 percent nitrogen, 0.005
percent sulphur, 0.05 percent oxygen,
0.01 percent aluminum, 0.05 percent
silicon, and 0.35 percent iron). SDC is
generally sold in briquetted form, as
‘‘pellets’’ or ‘‘compacts,’’ which typically
are 1.5 inches x 1 inch x 1 inch or
smaller in size and have a smooth
surface. SDC is currently classifiable
under subheading 8112.21.00 of the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:24 Dec 21, 2010
Jkt 223001
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS). The order
covers all chromium meeting the above
specifications for SDC regardless of
tariff classification.
Certain higher-purity and lowerpurity chromium products are excluded
from the scope of the order. Specifically,
the order does not cover electronicsgrade chromium, which contains a
higher percentage of chromium
(typically not less than 99.95 percent),
a much lower level of iron (less than
0.05 percent), and lower levels of other
impurities than SDC. The order also
does not cover ‘‘vacuum melt grade’’
chromium, which normally contains at
least 99.4 percent chromium and
contains a higher level of one or more
impurities (nitrogen, sulphur, oxygen,
aluminum and/or silicon) than specified
above for SDC.
Although the HTSUS subheading is
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description of the
scope of the order is dispositive.
Revocation
Pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(A) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(iii)(B)(3),
if no domestic interested party files a
notice of intent to participate, the
Department shall issue a final
determination revoking the order within
90 days of the initiation of the review.
Because no domestic interested party
filed a timely notice of intent to
participate in this sunset review, the
Department finds that no domestic
interested party is participating in this
sunset review. Therefore, we are
revoking the antidumping duty order on
SDC from Japan. The effective date of
revocation is December 22, 2010, the
fifth anniversary of the antidumping
duty order.
Effective Date of Revocation
Pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(A) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.222(i)(2)(i), the
Department intends to issue instructions
to U.S. Customs and Border Protection,
15 days after publication of this notice,
to terminate the suspension of
liquidation of the merchandise subject
to the order which was entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after December 22,
2010. Entries of subject merchandise
prior to the effective date of revocation
will continue to be subject to the
suspension of liquidation and
antidumping duty deposit requirements.
The Department is not conducting any
administrative reviews of this order
currently but it will conduct an
administrative review of the order with
respect to subject merchandise entered
prior to the effective date of revocation
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
in response to appropriately filed
requests for review.
This five-year (sunset) review and
notice are published in accordance with
sections 751(c) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: December 16, 2010.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010–32172 Filed 12–21–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–831]
Fresh Garlic from the People’s
Republic of China: Preliminary Results
of, Partial Rescission of, and Intent to
Rescind, in Part, the 15th Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Department) is conducting an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on fresh garlic
from the People’s Republic of China
(PRC) covering the period of review
(POR), November 1, 2008 through
October 31, 2009. The Department
initiated this review for 84 producers/
exporters (companies). Based on timely
withdrawal of requests for review, the
Department is now rescinding the
review with respect to 54 companies
which are listed in Attachment I. As
such, this review covers the 30
companies listed in Attachment II.
One producer/exporter selected as a
mandatory respondent has participated
fully and has demonstrated its eligibility
for a separate rate. We preliminarily
determine that the respondent sold
subject merchandise to the United
States at prices below normal value
(NV). The Department has also
preliminarily determined that total
adverse facts available (AFA) is
warranted for two mandatory
respondents who each failed to
cooperate to the best of its ability in this
proceeding. The Department
preliminarily grants a separate rate to
four companies which demonstrated the
eligibility for separate rate status. The
rates assigned to each of these
companies, can be found in the
‘‘Preliminary Results of Review’’ section
of this notice. The Department also
intends to rescind preliminarily the
review with respect to seven companies
which each timely submitted a ‘‘no
shipment’’ certification. The remaining
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\22DEN1.SGM
22DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 245 (Wednesday, December 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 80457-80458]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32172]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-588-866]
Superalloy Degassed Chromium From Japan: Final Results of Sunset
Review and Revocation of Antidumping Duty Order
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On November 1, 2010, the Department of Commerce (the
Department) initiated the sunset review of the antidumping duty order
on superalloy degassed chromium (SDC)
[[Page 80458]]
from Japan. See Initiation of Five-Year (``Sunset'') Review, 75 FR
67082 (November 1, 2010) (Initiation Notice). Because no domestic
interested party responded to the notice of initiation of the sunset
review by the applicable deadline, the Department is revoking the
antidumping duty order on SDC from Japan.
DATES: Effective Date: December 22, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerrold Freeman at (202) 482-0180 or
Minoo Hatten at (202) 482-1690, AD/CVD Operations, Office 5, Import
Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC
20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On December 22, 2005, the Department published in the Federal
Register the antidumping duty order on SDC from Japan. See Antidumping
Duty Order: Superalloy Degassed Chromium from Japan, 70 FR 76030
(December 22, 2005).
On November 1, 2010, the Department initiated a sunset review of
the antidumping duty order on SDC from Japan pursuant to section 751(c)
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). See Initiation Notice.
We received no response to the notice of initiation from domestic
interested parties by the applicable deadline date. See 19 CFR
351.218(d)(1)(i). As a result, the Department has concluded that no
domestic party intends to participate in the sunset review. See 19 CFR
351.218(d)(1)(iii)(A). On November 22, 2010, we notified the
International Trade Commission, in writing, that we intend to revoke
the antidumping duty order on SDC from Japan. See 19 CFR
351.218(d)(1)(iii)(B)(2).
Scope of the Order
The product covered by the order is all forms, sizes, and grades of
SDC from Japan. SDC is a high-purity form of chrome metal that
generally contains at least 99.5 percent, but less than 99.95 percent,
chromium. SDC contains very low levels of certain gaseous elements and
other impurities (typically no more than 0.005 percent nitrogen, 0.005
percent sulphur, 0.05 percent oxygen, 0.01 percent aluminum, 0.05
percent silicon, and 0.35 percent iron). SDC is generally sold in
briquetted form, as ``pellets'' or ``compacts,'' which typically are
1.5 inches x 1 inch x 1 inch or smaller in size and have a smooth
surface. SDC is currently classifiable under subheading 8112.21.00 of
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). The order
covers all chromium meeting the above specifications for SDC regardless
of tariff classification.
Certain higher-purity and lower-purity chromium products are
excluded from the scope of the order. Specifically, the order does not
cover electronics-grade chromium, which contains a higher percentage of
chromium (typically not less than 99.95 percent), a much lower level of
iron (less than 0.05 percent), and lower levels of other impurities
than SDC. The order also does not cover ``vacuum melt grade'' chromium,
which normally contains at least 99.4 percent chromium and contains a
higher level of one or more impurities (nitrogen, sulphur, oxygen,
aluminum and/or silicon) than specified above for SDC.
Although the HTSUS subheading is provided for convenience and
customs purposes, the written description of the scope of the order is
dispositive.
Revocation
Pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.218(d)(1)(iii)(B)(3), if no domestic interested party files a
notice of intent to participate, the Department shall issue a final
determination revoking the order within 90 days of the initiation of
the review. Because no domestic interested party filed a timely notice
of intent to participate in this sunset review, the Department finds
that no domestic interested party is participating in this sunset
review. Therefore, we are revoking the antidumping duty order on SDC
from Japan. The effective date of revocation is December 22, 2010, the
fifth anniversary of the antidumping duty order.
Effective Date of Revocation
Pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.222(i)(2)(i), the Department intends to issue instructions to U.S.
Customs and Border Protection, 15 days after publication of this
notice, to terminate the suspension of liquidation of the merchandise
subject to the order which was entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after December 22, 2010. Entries of subject
merchandise prior to the effective date of revocation will continue to
be subject to the suspension of liquidation and antidumping duty
deposit requirements. The Department is not conducting any
administrative reviews of this order currently but it will conduct an
administrative review of the order with respect to subject merchandise
entered prior to the effective date of revocation in response to
appropriately filed requests for review.
This five-year (sunset) review and notice are published in
accordance with sections 751(c) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: December 16, 2010.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-32172 Filed 12-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P