Ananke, Inc., Providence, RI; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration, 77664 [2010-31137]

Download as PDF 77664 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 238 / Monday, December 13, 2010 / Notices activities funded in whole or in part by the Department of Labor. Type of Review: Extension. Agency: Civil Rights Center, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management. Title: Compliance Information Report—29 CFR part 31 (Title VI), Nondiscrimination-Disability—29 CFR part 32 (section 504), and Nondiscrimination—Workforce Investment Act—29 CFR part 37 (section 188 of the Workforce Investment Act). OMB Number: 1225–0077. Affected Public: State, local or Tribal governments. Estimated Number of Respondents: 39,233,285. Frequency: Recurrent. Total Burden Cost (capital/startup): $0.00. Total Estimated Annual Responses: 2,153. Estimated Average Time Per Response: .33 hours. Total Burden Cost (operating/ maintenance): $151,743.20. Comments submitted in response to this comment request will be summarized and included in the request for Office of Management and Budget approval of the information collection request; they will also become a matter of public record. Signed at Washington, DC this 7th day of December, 2010. Ramon Suris-Fernandez, Director, Civil Rights Center. [FR Doc. 2010–31193 Filed 12–10–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–23–P support of furniture production at foreign facilities. The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination based on the findings that subject firm sales increased during the relevant period and the subject firm did not shift to/ acquire from a foreign country the supply of services like or directly competitive with those supplied by the subject workers. The investigation also revealed that the workers at the subject firm did not qualify to apply for TAA as adversely-affected secondary workers. In the request for reconsideration, the worker states that he was part of the ‘‘B.C. Vaughn plant’’ and ‘‘should not be considered an administrative and support services worker.’’ The worker further states that his position ‘‘was essential to the production operation’’ because he was responsible for scheduling trucks used to move furniture from the production plant to the warehouse. The Department of Labor has carefully reviewed the request for reconsideration and the existing record, and has determined that the Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. Conclusion After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S. Department of Labor’s prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted. Signed at Washington, DC this 3rd day of December, 2010. Del Min Amy Chen, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration October 6, 2010, and the Notice of Determination was published in the Federal Register on October 25, 2010 (75 FR 65520–21). The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination based on the findings that neither the subject firm nor a client firm shifted to/acquired from a foreign country the supply of services like or directly competitive with the services supplied by the workers, that the subject firm did not import like or directly competitive services during the relevant period, and that the subject workers are not adversely affected secondary workers. The request for reconsideration states that ‘‘Ananke Inc. performed application packaging services for John Hancock * * * In September 2009, John Hancock replaced * * * Ananke Inc. with * * * Cognizant Technology Solutions (an offshoring/outsourcing company)’’ and included support documentation. The Department of Labor has carefully reviewed the request for reconsideration and the existing record, and has determined that the Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. Conclusion After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S. Department of Labor’s prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted. Signed at Washington, DC this 1st day of December, 2010. Del Min Amy Chen, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 2010–31137 Filed 12–10–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P [FR Doc. 2010–31134 Filed 12–10–10; 8:45 am] [TA–W–74,551] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1 Vaughan Furniture Company, Galax, VA; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration By application dated November 4, 2010, a worker requested administrative reconsideration of the negative determination regarding workers’ eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers and former workers of Vaughn Furniture Company, Galax, Virginia (subject firm). The determination was issued on October 5, 2010. The Department’s Notice of Determination was published in the Federal Register on October 25, 2010 (75 FR 65520). The workers supply administrative and support services in VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:42 Dec 10, 2010 Jkt 223001 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–73,824] [TA–W–72,493] Ananke, Inc., Providence, RI; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration By application dated October 25, 2010, a worker requested administrative reconsideration of the negative determination regarding workers’ eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers and former workers of the subject firm. The determination was issued on PO 00000 Frm 00059 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Honeywell International, Inc., Automation and Control Solutions Division, Including On-Site Leased Workers From Manpower, Spherion, and Securitas, Rock Island, IL; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment E:\FR\FM\13DEN1.SGM 13DEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 238 (Monday, December 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 77664]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31137]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-72,493]


Ananke, Inc., Providence, RI; Notice of Affirmative Determination 
Regarding Application for Reconsideration

    By application dated October 25, 2010, a worker requested 
administrative reconsideration of the negative determination regarding 
workers' eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) 
applicable to workers and former workers of the subject firm. The 
determination was issued on October 6, 2010, and the Notice of 
Determination was published in the Federal Register on October 25, 2010 
(75 FR 65520-21).
    The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination 
based on the findings that neither the subject firm nor a client firm 
shifted to/acquired from a foreign country the supply of services like 
or directly competitive with the services supplied by the workers, that 
the subject firm did not import like or directly competitive services 
during the relevant period, and that the subject workers are not 
adversely affected secondary workers.
    The request for reconsideration states that ``Ananke Inc. performed 
application packaging services for John Hancock * * * In September 
2009, John Hancock replaced * * * Ananke Inc. with * * * Cognizant 
Technology Solutions (an offshoring/outsourcing company)'' and included 
support documentation.
    The Department of Labor has carefully reviewed the request for 
reconsideration and the existing record, and has determined that the 
Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the 
workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974, as 
amended.

Conclusion

    After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim 
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S. 
Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, 
granted.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 1st day of December, 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-31137 Filed 12-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P