Ananke, Inc., Providence, RI; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration, 77664 [2010-31137]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
77664
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 238 / Monday, December 13, 2010 / Notices
activities funded in whole or in part by
the Department of Labor.
Type of Review: Extension.
Agency: Civil Rights Center, Office of
the Assistant Secretary for
Administration and Management.
Title: Compliance Information
Report—29 CFR part 31 (Title VI),
Nondiscrimination-Disability—29 CFR
part 32 (section 504), and
Nondiscrimination—Workforce
Investment Act—29 CFR part 37
(section 188 of the Workforce
Investment Act).
OMB Number: 1225–0077.
Affected Public: State, local or Tribal
governments.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
39,233,285.
Frequency: Recurrent.
Total Burden Cost (capital/startup):
$0.00.
Total Estimated Annual Responses:
2,153.
Estimated Average Time Per
Response: .33 hours.
Total Burden Cost (operating/
maintenance): $151,743.20.
Comments submitted in response to
this comment request will be
summarized and included in the request
for Office of Management and Budget
approval of the information collection
request; they will also become a matter
of public record.
Signed at Washington, DC this 7th day of
December, 2010.
Ramon Suris-Fernandez,
Director, Civil Rights Center.
[FR Doc. 2010–31193 Filed 12–10–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–23–P
support of furniture production at
foreign facilities.
The initial investigation resulted in a
negative determination based on the
findings that subject firm sales
increased during the relevant period
and the subject firm did not shift to/
acquire from a foreign country the
supply of services like or directly
competitive with those supplied by the
subject workers. The investigation also
revealed that the workers at the subject
firm did not qualify to apply for TAA
as adversely-affected secondary
workers.
In the request for reconsideration, the
worker states that he was part of the
‘‘B.C. Vaughn plant’’ and ‘‘should not be
considered an administrative and
support services worker.’’ The worker
further states that his position ‘‘was
essential to the production operation’’
because he was responsible for
scheduling trucks used to move
furniture from the production plant to
the warehouse.
The Department of Labor has carefully
reviewed the request for reconsideration
and the existing record, and has
determined that the Department will
conduct further investigation to
determine if the workers meet the
eligibility requirements of the Trade Act
of 1974, as amended.
Conclusion
After careful review of the
application, I conclude that the claim is
of sufficient weight to justify
reconsideration of the U.S. Department
of Labor’s prior decision. The
application is, therefore, granted.
Signed at Washington, DC this 3rd day of
December, 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
October 6, 2010, and the Notice of
Determination was published in the
Federal Register on October 25, 2010
(75 FR 65520–21).
The initial investigation resulted in a
negative determination based on the
findings that neither the subject firm nor
a client firm shifted to/acquired from a
foreign country the supply of services
like or directly competitive with the
services supplied by the workers, that
the subject firm did not import like or
directly competitive services during the
relevant period, and that the subject
workers are not adversely affected
secondary workers.
The request for reconsideration states
that ‘‘Ananke Inc. performed application
packaging services for John Hancock
* * * In September 2009, John Hancock
replaced * * * Ananke Inc. with * * *
Cognizant Technology Solutions (an
offshoring/outsourcing company)’’ and
included support documentation.
The Department of Labor has carefully
reviewed the request for reconsideration
and the existing record, and has
determined that the Department will
conduct further investigation to
determine if the workers meet the
eligibility requirements of the Trade Act
of 1974, as amended.
Conclusion
After careful review of the
application, I conclude that the claim is
of sufficient weight to justify
reconsideration of the U.S. Department
of Labor’s prior decision. The
application is, therefore, granted.
Signed at Washington, DC this 1st day of
December, 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010–31137 Filed 12–10–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
[FR Doc. 2010–31134 Filed 12–10–10; 8:45 am]
[TA–W–74,551]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
Vaughan Furniture Company, Galax,
VA; Notice of Affirmative
Determination Regarding Application
for Reconsideration
By application dated November 4,
2010, a worker requested administrative
reconsideration of the negative
determination regarding workers’
eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment
Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers
and former workers of Vaughn Furniture
Company, Galax, Virginia (subject firm).
The determination was issued on
October 5, 2010. The Department’s
Notice of Determination was published
in the Federal Register on October 25,
2010 (75 FR 65520). The workers supply
administrative and support services in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:42 Dec 10, 2010
Jkt 223001
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–73,824]
[TA–W–72,493]
Ananke, Inc., Providence, RI; Notice of
Affirmative Determination Regarding
Application for Reconsideration
By application dated October 25,
2010, a worker requested administrative
reconsideration of the negative
determination regarding workers’
eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment
Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers
and former workers of the subject firm.
The determination was issued on
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Honeywell International, Inc.,
Automation and Control Solutions
Division, Including On-Site Leased
Workers From Manpower, Spherion,
and Securitas, Rock Island, IL;
Amended Certification Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended (‘‘Act’’),
19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor
issued a Certification of Eligibility to
Apply for Worker Adjustment
E:\FR\FM\13DEN1.SGM
13DEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 238 (Monday, December 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 77664]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31137]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-72,493]
Ananke, Inc., Providence, RI; Notice of Affirmative Determination
Regarding Application for Reconsideration
By application dated October 25, 2010, a worker requested
administrative reconsideration of the negative determination regarding
workers' eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA)
applicable to workers and former workers of the subject firm. The
determination was issued on October 6, 2010, and the Notice of
Determination was published in the Federal Register on October 25, 2010
(75 FR 65520-21).
The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination
based on the findings that neither the subject firm nor a client firm
shifted to/acquired from a foreign country the supply of services like
or directly competitive with the services supplied by the workers, that
the subject firm did not import like or directly competitive services
during the relevant period, and that the subject workers are not
adversely affected secondary workers.
The request for reconsideration states that ``Ananke Inc. performed
application packaging services for John Hancock * * * In September
2009, John Hancock replaced * * * Ananke Inc. with * * * Cognizant
Technology Solutions (an offshoring/outsourcing company)'' and included
support documentation.
The Department of Labor has carefully reviewed the request for
reconsideration and the existing record, and has determined that the
Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the
workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended.
Conclusion
After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S.
Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore,
granted.
Signed at Washington, DC this 1st day of December, 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-31137 Filed 12-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
