Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ OMX BX Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Relating to Fees for Direct Access to Exchange Data, 77029-77031 [2010-31100]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 237 / Friday, December 10, 2010 / Notices C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others No written comments were either solicited or received. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.7 At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s Internet comment form https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml; or • Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–Phlx–2010–170 on the subject line. Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–Phlx–2010–170. This file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–Phlx– 2010–170 and should be submitted on or before January 3, 2011. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.8 Florence E. Harmon, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2010–31101 Filed 12–9–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–63442; File No. SR–BX– 2010–081] Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ OMX BX Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Relating to Fees for Direct Access to Exchange Data December 6, 2010. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on November 24, 2010, The NASDAQ BX OMX, Inc. (‘‘BX’’ or ‘‘The Exchange’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by BX. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of the Substance of the Proposed Rule Change BX proposes an amendment to the fee schedule to assess ‘‘direct access’’ fees 8 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 1 15 7 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii). VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:39 Dec 09, 2010 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00080 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 77029 on customers receiving Exchange data within the Exchange co-location facility. The rule filing also deletes outdated verbiage in the fee schedule to eliminate confusion regarding application of the fees, and corrects a minor typographical error in the rule. BX will implement the proposed change on December 1, 2010. The text of the proposed rule change is available from the principal office of the Exchange, at the Commission’s Public Reference Room and also on the Exchange’s Internet Web site at https:// nasdaqomxbx.cchwallstreet.com/ NASDAQOMXBX/Filings/. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, BX included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. BX has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose BX is amending its fee schedule to correct an anomaly that effectively exempts certain customers residing within the Exchange’s co-location facility from paying a monthly fee for direct access to Exchange data, while customers that receive data from an extranet and reside outside the colocation facility are assessed the fee. The inequity is a result of the definition of ‘‘direct access’’ in the fee schedule, which does not by its terms clearly apply to data feeds provided to customers through distributors located within the co-located facility. This rule filing will expand the definition of ‘‘direct access’’ and thereby operate to assess the same fee on all firms that have access to the Exchange’s raw data feeds, whether co-located or not. It will also delete terms that are obsolete or generally limiting, given the evolution of technologies and systems through which data may be accessed. The Exchange, like other data providers, assesses fees for its real time market data. In general, a customer that receives a data feed directly from the Exchange is assessed a ‘‘direct access’’ fee. If the customer then distributes the data, it is a ‘‘distributor’’ as defined E:\FR\FM\10DEN1.SGM 10DEN1 77030 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 237 / Friday, December 10, 2010 / Notices mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES under the fee schedule and pays an ‘‘internal’’ or ‘‘external’’ distributor fee, depending upon whether it distributes the data internally or externally. A ‘‘distributor’’ is broadly defined to include any entity that distributes the Exchange’s data, whether it receives the data feed directly from the Exchange or indirectly through another entity. Distributor fees apply to distributors located within the Exchange’s colocation facility as well as those outside of it. The definition of what constitutes ‘‘direct access,’’ however, is limited to several types of communications connections, none of which accurately describe the systems by which data is delivered through distributors located within the co-location facility to their customers also located within the colocation facility. As a result, the distributor’s customers in the colocation facility are not charged a direct access fee, even though they receive the Exchange’s data in its raw data format and have the same low latency data access as non-co-located extranet customers that pay the Direct Access fee. To correct this disparity, this rule filing will include within the definition of ‘‘direct access’’ the receipt of Exchange data within the co-location facility. It will also delete terms that, while describing various means by which data is currently accessed, do not clearly or adequately describe all viable technological means of accessing data. More specifically, the terms ‘‘Exchangeoperated Web site, system or application’’ are deleted, as they are limiting terms that do not clearly encompass potential technological means of accessing Exchange data. Their elimination does not impact the fees of any customer currently assessed a Direct Access fee, but should preclude the need for future rule changes to the definition of direct access, as the means by which those same customers access data evolve over time. The filing also corrects minor typographical errors in the fee schedule, in the interest of clarity and consistency. 2. Statutory Basis The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the provisions of Section 6 of the Act,3 in general, and with Sections 6(b)(5) of the Act,4 in particular. The proposal is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. The filing permits transparent, uniform fees for direct access to Exchange data for all customers, whether co-located or not. In addition, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the provisions of Section 6 of the Act,5 in general, and with Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,6 in particular, in that it provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges among members and issuers and other persons using any facility or system which The Exchange operates or controls. In particular, the Exchange notes that the amendment corrects an anomaly that effectively exempts certain customers receiving the data from paying a direct access fee. B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended. C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others Written comments were neither solicited nor received. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.7 At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved. 5 15 U.S.C. 78f. U.S.C. 78f(b)(4). 7 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(a)(ii). 3 15 U.S.C. 78f. 4 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:39 Dec 09, 2010 6 15 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00081 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change, as amended, is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s Internet comment form https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml; or • Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–BX–2010–081 on the subject line. Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–BX–2010–081. This file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s Internet Web site https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml. Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–BX– 2010–081, and should be submitted on or before January 3, 2011. E:\FR\FM\10DEN1.SGM 10DEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 237 / Friday, December 10, 2010 / Notices For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.8 Florence E. Harmon, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2010–31100 Filed 12–9–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–63440; File No. SR– NYSEArca-2010–112] Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Amending NYSE Arca Equities Rules 7.31(k) and 7.23(a)(1) To Modify Certain Characteristics of the Q Order and Clarify the Interest Eligible for Satisfaction of a Market Maker’s Two-Sided Obligation December 6, 2010. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1, and Rule 19b–4 2 thereunder, notice is hereby given that on December 3, 2010, NYSE Arca, Inc. (‘‘NYSE Arca’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to amend NYSE Arca Equities Rules 7.31(k) and 7.23(a)(1) to modify certain characteristics of the Q Order and clarify the interest eligible for satisfaction of a Market Maker’s TwoSided Obligation, respectively. The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange, the Commission’s Public Reference Room, and https:// www.nyse.com. mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text 8 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 1 15 VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:39 Dec 09, 2010 Jkt 223001 of those statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such statements. 1. Purpose The Exchange proposes to amend NYSE Arca Equities Rules 7.31(k) and 7.23(a)(1) to modify certain characteristics of the Q Order and clarify the interest eligible for satisfaction of a Market Maker’s TwoSided Obligation, respectively. A Market Maker is currently able to satisfy its Two-Sided Obligation 3 by instructing the NYSE Arca Marketplace to enter a Q Order on its behalf either (1) at the last price and size entered by the Market Maker during the previous trading day, including or excluding reserve size, or (2) at a specified percentage from the best bid or offer.4 Currently, upon execution, a Q Order entered with reserve size pursuant to NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.31(k)(1)(A)(1) will automatically repost with the original display size and $10 below (above) the original bid (offer).5 This particular automatic reposting could result in a Q Order with a price that is significantly worse than the published National Best Bid or Offer (‘‘NBBO’’). Moreover, depending on the price of the security at issue, the automatic reposting could result in a Market Maker posting a Q Order at a price that is not in compliance with the new Market Maker pricing obligations set forth in amended NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.23(a)(1)(B), which are to be implemented on December 6, 2010. Accordingly, the Exchange proposes to delete the text of NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.31(k)(1)(B)(1) in its entirety 6 and delete the text ‘‘entered without reserve size’’ from NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.31(k)(1)(B)(2) to provide that a Market Maker, upon execution of its Q Order entered with reserve size, would be responsible for immediately posting a new Q order, rather than the Q order automatically reposting $10 below (above) the original bid (offer). The Exchange notes that Market Makers are 3 See NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.23(a)(1). NYSE Arca Equities 7.31(k)(1)(A)(1)–(2). 5 See NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.31(k)(1)(B)(1). If the Market Maker specifies a reserve size for the Q Order, it will not automatically repost once the reserve size is exhausted. 6 The Exchange proposes the place NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.31(k)(1)(B)(1) in ‘Reserve’ for possible use at a later date. 4 See PO 00000 Frm 00082 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 77031 currently required to post a new Q order upon execution of Q orders entered without reserve size. Requiring the same of Q orders originally entered with reserve size would encourage Q order prices that bear a closer relationship to the NBBO than the current $10 above/ below reposting price, thus promoting fair and orderly markets and the protection of investors and reducing the risk of executions at illogical prices. The Exchange previously represented to the Commission, in filing SR– NYSEArca–2010–83, that it would submit a filing with the changes proposed herein, including a proposed implementation date of Monday, December 6, 2010, consistent with the implementation date for the new Market Maker pricing obligations.7 The Exchange further proposes clarifying revisions to recently amended Rule 7.23(a)(1). In filing SR–NYSEArca– 2010–83, the Exchange noted that Market Makers would use Q orders to meet the new Two-Sided Obligation under Rule 7.23(a)(1).8 The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 7.23(a)(1) to delete the requirement that Market Makers exclusively use Q orders to meet their Two-Sided Obligation. Rule 7.23(a)(1) would continue to require that Market Makers identify to the Exchange the interest that is being used to satisfy the Two-Sided Obligation. While Market Makers may continue to use Q orders to satisfy the Two-Sided Obligation, the Exchange believes that Market Makers should be permitted to use other types of interest to satisfy this obligation, provided that the interest is displayed and identified to the Exchange. The proposed revision to Rule 7.23(a)(1) is consistent with the rules adopted by other exchanges.9 2. Statutory Basis The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Act’’),10 in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,11 in particular, in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Specifically, the Exchange believes that the change 7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 63255 (November 5, 2010), 75 FR 69484 (November 12, 2010) (SR–NYSEArca–2010–83). 8 Id. 9 See, e.g., Nasdaq Rule 4613. 10 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). 11 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). E:\FR\FM\10DEN1.SGM 10DEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 237 (Friday, December 10, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77029-77031]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31100]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-63442; File No. SR-BX-2010-081]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ OMX BX Inc.; Notice of 
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Relating to 
Fees for Direct Access to Exchange Data

December 6, 2010.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that 
on November 24, 2010, The NASDAQ BX OMX, Inc. (``BX'' or ``The 
Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, 
and III below, which Items have been prepared by BX. The Commission is 
publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change 
from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the 
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change

    BX proposes an amendment to the fee schedule to assess ``direct 
access'' fees on customers receiving Exchange data within the Exchange 
co-location facility. The rule filing also deletes outdated verbiage in 
the fee schedule to eliminate confusion regarding application of the 
fees, and corrects a minor typographical error in the rule. BX will 
implement the proposed change on December 1, 2010. The text of the 
proposed rule change is available from the principal office of the 
Exchange, at the Commission's Public Reference Room and also on the 
Exchange's Internet Web site at https://nasdaqomxbx.cchwallstreet.com/NASDAQOMXBX/Filings/.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, BX included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. BX has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, 
and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    BX is amending its fee schedule to correct an anomaly that 
effectively exempts certain customers residing within the Exchange's 
co-location facility from paying a monthly fee for direct access to 
Exchange data, while customers that receive data from an extranet and 
reside outside the co-location facility are assessed the fee. The 
inequity is a result of the definition of ``direct access'' in the fee 
schedule, which does not by its terms clearly apply to data feeds 
provided to customers through distributors located within the co-
located facility. This rule filing will expand the definition of 
``direct access'' and thereby operate to assess the same fee on all 
firms that have access to the Exchange's raw data feeds, whether co-
located or not. It will also delete terms that are obsolete or 
generally limiting, given the evolution of technologies and systems 
through which data may be accessed.
    The Exchange, like other data providers, assesses fees for its real 
time market data. In general, a customer that receives a data feed 
directly from the Exchange is assessed a ``direct access'' fee. If the 
customer then distributes the data, it is a ``distributor'' as defined

[[Page 77030]]

under the fee schedule and pays an ``internal'' or ``external'' 
distributor fee, depending upon whether it distributes the data 
internally or externally. A ``distributor'' is broadly defined to 
include any entity that distributes the Exchange's data, whether it 
receives the data feed directly from the Exchange or indirectly through 
another entity. Distributor fees apply to distributors located within 
the Exchange's co-location facility as well as those outside of it.
    The definition of what constitutes ``direct access,'' however, is 
limited to several types of communications connections, none of which 
accurately describe the systems by which data is delivered through 
distributors located within the co-location facility to their customers 
also located within the co-location facility. As a result, the 
distributor's customers in the co-location facility are not charged a 
direct access fee, even though they receive the Exchange's data in its 
raw data format and have the same low latency data access as non-co-
located extranet customers that pay the Direct Access fee.
    To correct this disparity, this rule filing will include within the 
definition of ``direct access'' the receipt of Exchange data within the 
co-location facility. It will also delete terms that, while describing 
various means by which data is currently accessed, do not clearly or 
adequately describe all viable technological means of accessing data. 
More specifically, the terms ``Exchange-operated Web site, system or 
application'' are deleted, as they are limiting terms that do not 
clearly encompass potential technological means of accessing Exchange 
data. Their elimination does not impact the fees of any customer 
currently assessed a Direct Access fee, but should preclude the need 
for future rule changes to the definition of direct access, as the 
means by which those same customers access data evolve over time.
    The filing also corrects minor typographical errors in the fee 
schedule, in the interest of clarity and consistency.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent 
with the provisions of Section 6 of the Act,\3\ in general, and with 
Sections 6(b)(5) of the Act,\4\ in particular. The proposal is designed 
to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote 
just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and 
coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, 
processing information with respect to, and facilitating transactions 
in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a 
free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to 
protect investors and the public interest. The filing permits 
transparent, uniform fees for direct access to Exchange data for all 
customers, whether co-located or not.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is 
consistent with the provisions of Section 6 of the Act,\5\ in general, 
and with Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,\6\ in particular, in that it 
provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and 
other charges among members and issuers and other persons using any 
facility or system which The Exchange operates or controls. In 
particular, the Exchange notes that the amendment corrects an anomaly 
that effectively exempts certain customers receiving the data from 
paying a direct access fee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or 
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.\7\ At any time within 60 days of the filing 
of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily 
suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such 
action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the 
protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of 
the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall 
institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule should be 
approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(a)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change, as amended, is consistent with the Act. Comments may be 
submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml; or
     Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include 
File Number SR-BX-2010-081 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy, 
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BX-2010-081. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To 
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's Internet Web site https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml. 
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written 
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with 
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed 
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those 
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions 
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in 
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, 
DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 
p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and 
copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received 
will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal 
identifying information from submissions. You should submit only 
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions 
should refer to File Number SR-BX-2010-081, and should be submitted on 
or before January 3, 2011.


[[Page 77031]]


    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\8\
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2010-31100 Filed 12-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.