Reports, Forms, and Record Keeping Requirements, 76781-76783 [2010-30975]
Download as PDF
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 236 / Thursday, December 9, 2010 / Notices
Private Rail Car Owners and/or Railroad
Passenger Car Alliance, invited guests,
and paying passengers (providing an
opportunity for passenger travel of a
bygone era). The main operations occur
over scenic, long-distance routes
through rural countryside (outside highrisk, dense urban areas), which are lowrisk areas for window damage or
breakage. The car is operated at a
maximum track speed as authorized by
the railroad controlling movement, and
is certified by Amtrak to operate at 110
mph. Typically, these operations
amount to about 4,000 miles each year.
The Stablers state that the passenger
car is equipped with dual-pane
automotive style laminated safety glass,
which, in addition to providing a
thermal insulation benefit, protects
occupants from injury caused by the
likelihood of a projectile striking the
outer pane but not penetrating the inner
pane. They also state that there have not
been any reports of injury to occupants
of this car for the last 20 years. Since the
1996 ownership by the Stablers, there
have not been any accidents/incidents
attributed to glazing in this car. The
owners further state that they maintain
the car to Amtrak standards or to a
standard required by the operating
railroad.
Additionally, the Stablers have a
current and feasible emergency egress
plan for the car that consists of the
following: (1) The two end doors are
always unlocked when the car is in
motion; (2) each bedroom is equipped
with a hammer and flashlight (the
hammers, specifically designed to break
glass, are located next to each window;
(3) the general lounge area is equipped
with a 6-pound sledge hammer, a 3-foot
pry bar, a Pullman bi-metal saw, and an
axe stored in a labelled emergency tool
holder, which is located in the entryway
hallway; (4) the car is equipped with
four fire extinguishers (two mounted
and one located at each end of the car),
and two first-aid kits; (5) the car is
equipped, at all times, with a two-way
radio for communication with the train
crew, as well as a cell phone; and (6) all
arriving passengers are given a safety
briefing on the location and basic
operation of breakout tools, fire
extinguishers, and first-aid kits.
The Stablers request that the certified
glazing requirements be waived for the
Two Rivers passenger car at this time
due to the accident and vandalism free
history, the long-distance routes through
rural countryside, and the prohibitive
cost to replace the side windows. The
Stablers agree to replace any glazing
presently installed on the car with FRAcompliant safety glazing in the event
that the same is either cracked or
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:35 Dec 08, 2010
Jkt 223001
broken, or reaches the end of its service
life (i.e., scratched, polycarbonate, etc.).
Interested parties are invited to
participate in these proceedings by
submitting written views, data, or
comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in
connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a
hearing. If any interested party desires
an opportunity for oral comment, they
should notify FRA, in writing, before
the end of the comment period and
specify the basis for their request.
All communications concerning these
proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number (e.g., Waiver
Petition Docket Number FRA–2010–
0153) and may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
• Web site: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Operations Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
Communications received within 45
days of the date of this notice will be
considered by FRA before final action is
taken. Comments received after that
date will be considered as far as
practicable. All written communications
concerning these proceedings are
available for examination during regular
business hours (9 a.m.–5 p.m.) at the
above facility. All documents in the
public docket are also available for
inspection and copying on the Internet
at the docket facility’s Web site at https://
www.regulations.gov.
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of any written
communications and comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70; Page 19477–78) or at
https://www.dot.gov/privacy.html.
Issued in Washington, DC on December 3,
2010.
Michael J. Logue,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety
Compliance and Program Implementation.
[FR Doc. 2010–30911 Filed 12–8–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
76781
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[U.S. DOT Docket No. NHTSA–2010–0157]
Reports, Forms, and Record Keeping
Requirements
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Request for public comment on
proposed revision of the previously
approved collection of information,
OMB #2127–0646.
AGENCY:
Before a Federal agency can
collect certain information from the
public, it must receive approval from
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). Under procedures established
by the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995, before seeking OMB approval,
Federal agencies must solicit public
comment on proposed collections of
information, including extensions and
reinstatements of previously approved
collections.
This document describes the
collection of information for which
NHTSA intends to seek OMB approval.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before February 7, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by DOT Docket ID Number
NHTSA–2010–0157 using any of the
following methods:
Electronic submissions: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Docket Management Facility,
M–30, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, Washington, DC
20590.
Hand Delivery: West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: 1–202–493–2251.
Instructions: Each submission must
include the Agency name and the
Docket number for this Notice. Note that
all comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov including any
personal information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Alan Block, Contracting Officer’s
Technical Representative, Office of
Behavioral Safety Research (NTI–131),
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., W46–499, Washington, DC
20590. Mr. Block’s phone number is
202–366–6401 and his e-mail address is
alan.block@dot.gov.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\09DEN1.SGM
09DEN1
76782
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 236 / Thursday, December 9, 2010 / Notices
Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
before an agency submits a proposed
collection of information to OMB for
approval, it must publish a document in
the Federal Register providing a 60-day
comment period and otherwise consult
with members of the public and affected
agencies concerning each proposed
collection of information. The OMB has
promulgated regulations describing
what must be included in such a
document. Under OMB’s regulations (at
5 CFR 1320.8(d)), an agency must ask
for public comment on the following:
(i) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(ii) the accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
(iii) how to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(iv) how to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including the use
of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
In compliance with these
requirements, NHTSA asks public
comment on the following proposed
revision of the previously approved
collection of information, OMB #2127–
0646:
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Evaluation Surveys for Impaired
Driving and Seat Belt Interventions
Type of Request—Revision of the
previously approved collection of
information.
OMB Clearance Number—2127–0646.
Form Number—NHTSA 1010,
NHTSA 1011.
Requested Expiration Date of
Approval—3 years from date of
approval.
Summary of the Collection of
Information—The National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
proposes to conduct telephone surveys
to evaluate interventions designed to
increase seat belt use and reduce
alcohol-impaired driving. Sample sizes
would range from 200 to 2000
depending on the geographic unit being
surveyed (Nation, Region, State,
Community) and the evaluation design
for the intervention (e.g., number of
analytic groups). Interview length
would be 10 minutes. The surveys
would collect information on attitudes,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:35 Dec 08, 2010
Jkt 223001
awareness, knowledge, and behavior
related to the intervention. The surveys
would follow a pre-post design where
they are administered prior to the
implementation of the intervention and
after its conclusion. Interim survey
waves may also be administered if the
duration of the intervention permits.
In conducting the proposed surveys,
the interviewers would use computerassisted telephone interviewing to
reduce interview length and minimize
recording errors. The proposed surveys
would be anonymous.
Description of the Need for the
Information and Proposed Use of the
Information—NHTSA was established
to reduce the number of deaths, injuries,
and economic losses resulting from
motor vehicle crashes on the Nation’s
highways. As part of this statutory
mandate, NHTSA is authorized to
conduct research as a foundation for the
development of motor vehicle standards
and traffic safety programs.
The heavy toll that alcohol-impaired
driving exacts on the nation in fatalities,
injuries, and economic costs is well
documented. In addition, non-use of
seat belts continues to contribute
significantly to the number of traffic
fatalities. The persistence of these traffic
safety problems points to an ongoing
need for effective interventions to
address alcohol-impaired driving and
non-use of seat belts. This in turn calls
for strong evaluation efforts to identify
what interventions are effective.
The Safe, Accountable, Flexible,
Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A
Legacy For Users (SAFETEA–LU) is a
funding and authorization bill that
governs United States federal Surface
Transportation spending. Signed into
law in 2005, sections within the law
have stimulated heightened program
activity to reduce alcohol-impaired
driving and increase seat belt use.
Under section 410 of SAFETEA–LU,
spending authority for State grants to
implement alcohol-impaired driving
countermeasures rose from slightly
under $40 million in 2005 to $139
million in 2009. To be eligible for the
grants, States had to carry out a
specified number of programs from the
following list: Statewide checkpoints
and/or saturation patrols, prosecution
and adjudication outreach programs,
increased rate of BAC testing of drivers
in fatal crashes, stronger sanctions for
high-risk drivers with BACs of 0.15
percent or more, effective alcohol
rehabilitation for repeat offenders or a
program to refer them to DWI courts,
underage drinking prevention programs,
administrative license suspension or
revocation for DUI, and self-sustaining
impaired driving prevention programs.
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Section 406 of SAFETEA–LU set the
funding authority for State seat belt
performance grants at $124.5 million
per year between 2006 and 2009. States
were eligible for the grants based on
specified seat belt performance criteria.
Under Section 405 of SAFETEA–LU,
funding authority for State occupant
protection incentive grants increased
from $19.84 million in 2005 to $25
million in 2009. Grant eligibility was
based on specified criteria regarding the
presence of occupant protection
programs, laws, and associated penalties
for violation. Use of grant funds was
restricted to implementing and
enforcing occupant protection programs.
Section 2009 of SAFETEA–LU
established a new program to administer
at least 2 high visibility enforcement
programs to increase seat belt use and/
or reduce alcohol-impaired or drugimpaired driving. Grant funds could be
used for the development, production,
and use of broadcast and print media in
carrying out traffic safety law
enforcement campaigns.
Funding of these programs has
continued with extension of SAFETEA–
LU into fiscal years 2010 and 2011.
NHTSA needs to be prepared for
inclusion of the programs in the
upcoming Surface Transportation
Reauthorization. This means
maintaining a strong evaluation program
that monitors the effectiveness of
intervention models being implemented
under this funded intervention activity,
and identifies where changes are
needed. Telephone surveys have been
an important component in NHTSA’s
evaluation activity. They have been
used to measure public awareness of
intervention campaigns, penetration of
campaign messages, and perceived risk
of negative consequences from engaging
in proscribed behavior. The surveys
have typically followed a pre-post
design, where differences between an
initial baseline survey wave and a later
survey wave were associated with an
intervening intervention. NHTSA has
found such surveys to be valuable in
assessing the multi-million dollar
national media campaigns conducted
for the National Alcohol Crackdowns
and the National Click It or Ticket
Mobilizations. They also have been
useful in evaluating localized programs
that tested variants of intervention
models by providing information to
assess campaign communications or
interpret collected behavioral measures.
With seat belt and impaired driving
intervention activity anticipated to
remain heavy for the foreseeable future,
there is a need for NHTSA to continue
to apply these data collection
E:\FR\FM\09DEN1.SGM
09DEN1
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 236 / Thursday, December 9, 2010 / Notices
techniques to see if the campaigns are
achieving their objectives.
Description of the Likely Respondents
(Including Estimated Number, and
Proposed Frequency of Response to the
Collection of Information)—Over the
next 3 years, NHTSA intends to conduct
National telephone surveys to collect
data from 36,000 participants. For the
National Alcohol Crackdown, 2 sets of
pre/post intervention surveys, each with
sample sizes of 1,500, will be
administered annually for 3 years.
Similarly, for the National Click It or
Ticket Mobilization, 2 sets of pre/post
intervention surveys, each with sample
sizes of 1,500, will be administered
annually for 3 years.
In conducting one or more of the
National surveys, NHTSA may have a
need to collect information to assess
localized activity associated with the
National Alcohol Crackdown or
National Click It or Ticket Mobilization.
This would involve augmentation of the
pre- and post-national sample with one
or more Regional, State, or Community
samples. These samples will range from
200 to 2,000. Typically they will be
approximately 500. NHTSA intends to
complete a maximum of 24,000 of these
localized interviews over the next three
years.
In addition to the surveys associated
with the National Alcohol Crackdown
and National Click It or Ticket
Mobilization, NHTSA intends to
conduct telephone surveys to assess
selected demonstrations of interventions
designed to reduce alcohol-impaired
driving and/or increase seat belt use.
The surveys will follow a pre-post
design. Interventions sustained over an
extended period of time may add one or
more interim survey waves. Typically, a
State demonstration survey will require
500 participants per survey wave. A
regional demonstration can range from
as few as 200 participants for a small
county to 2,000 participants for a Region
covering more than one State. NHTSA
intends to complete a maximum of
40,800 of these interviews over the next
three years.
Interviews will be conducted with
persons at residential phone numbers
selected using random digit dialing. For
interviews conducted with persons
using landline phones, no more than
one respondent per household will be
selected. For interviews conducted with
persons on cell phones, a single user of
the cell phone will be selected. Each
sample member will complete just one
interview. Businesses are ineligible for
the sample and would not be
interviewed.
Estimate of the Total Annual
Reporting and Record Keeping Burden
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:35 Dec 08, 2010
Jkt 223001
Resulting from the Collection of
Information—NHTSA estimates that
respondents in the sample would
require an average of 10 minutes to
complete the telephone interviews. The
annual estimated reporting burden on
the general public for the National
surveys would be a maximum of 2,000
hours to conduct 12,000 interviews.
Over the requested three year period,
this would be 6,000 hours to conduct
36,000 interviews. The annual estimated
reporting burden on the general public
for the localized Crackdown and
Mobilization surveys would be a
maximum of 1,333.33 hours to conduct
8,000 interviews. Over the requested
three year period, this would be 4,000
hours to conduct 24,000 interviews. The
annual estimated reporting burden on
the general public for the demonstration
project surveys would be a maximum of
2,266.67 hours to conduct 13,600
interviews. Over the requested three
year period, this would be 6,800 hours
to conduct 40,800 interviews. In total,
the annual estimated reporting burden
on the public would be a maximum of
5,600 hours to conduct 33,600
interviews. Over the requested three
year period this would be 16,800 hours
to conduct 100,800 interviews. The
respondents would not incur any
reporting cost from the information
collection. The respondents also would
not incur any record keeping burden or
record keeping cost from the
information collection.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. Section 3506(c)(2)(A)
Jeffrey Michael,
Associate Administrator, Research and
Program Development.
[FR Doc. 2010–30975 Filed 12–8–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
Reports, Forms, and Record Keeping
Requirements; Agency Information
Collection Activity Under OMB Review
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice
announces that the Information
Collection Request (ICR) abstracted
below is being forwarded to the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and comment. The ICR describes
the nature of the information collection
and the expected burden. The Federal
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
76783
Register Notice with a 60-day comment
period was published on September 13,
2010 (75 FR 55629–55630).
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before [insert date 30 days after
publication].
Send comments, within 30
days, to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, 725–17th
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503,
Attention NHTSA Desk Officer.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Randolph Atkins, Ph.D., Office of
Behavioral Safety Research, National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration,
NTI–131, Room W46–500, 1200 New
Jersey Ave., SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Dr. Atkins’ phone number is 202–366–
5597 and his e-mail address is
randolph.atkins@dot.gov.
ADDRESSES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: National Survey of Speeding
Attitudes and Behavior: 2010.
Type of Request: New information
collection requirement.
Abstract: Data from previous studies
by the National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration (NHTSA) has shown
that 31 percent of all fatal crashes are
directly traceable to excessive speed. In
2008, 11,674 people died in excessive
speed-related crashes. The cost of these
crashes is approximately 40 billion
dollars per year. Surveys of drivers’
attitudes toward speeding have
demonstrated a strong correlation
between drivers’ attitudes towards
speeding and other driving behaviors
and actual traffic outcomes. Models
based on self-reported measures of
intentions and attitudes are used to
predict traffic behaviors and design
interventions to reduce speeding and
other hazardous traffic actions. Some of
these models stress the importance of
attitude, habits and the interaction of
habit with intention.
NHTSA proposes to conduct a 2010
National Survey of Speeding Attitudes
and Behavior by telephone among a
sample of 6,000 adults (age 16 and
older). NHTSA’s information needs
require a telephone survey of a national
probability sample of drivers in the
United States that will provide insight
into why drivers speed and which
methods of enforcement would
discourage them from speeding. The
questionnaire will contain items on the
extent to which drivers speed,
demographic and typological
descriptions of speeders, locations and
times when speeding is most frequent,
attitudes and perceptions about
speeding, reasons and motivations for
speeding, knowledge of measures to
E:\FR\FM\09DEN1.SGM
09DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 236 (Thursday, December 9, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76781-76783]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30975]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[U.S. DOT Docket No. NHTSA-2010-0157]
Reports, Forms, and Record Keeping Requirements
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Request for public comment on proposed revision of the
previously approved collection of information, OMB 2127-0646.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Before a Federal agency can collect certain information from
the public, it must receive approval from the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB). Under procedures established by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, before seeking OMB approval, Federal agencies must solicit
public comment on proposed collections of information, including
extensions and reinstatements of previously approved collections.
This document describes the collection of information for which
NHTSA intends to seek OMB approval.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before February 7, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by DOT Docket ID Number
NHTSA-2010-0157 using any of the following methods:
Electronic submissions: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, M-30, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
Instructions: Each submission must include the Agency name and the
Docket number for this Notice. Note that all comments received will be
posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov including any
personal information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Alan Block, Contracting Officer's
Technical Representative, Office of Behavioral Safety Research (NTI-
131), National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., W46-499, Washington, DC 20590. Mr. Block's phone number is
202-366-6401 and his e-mail address is alan.block@dot.gov.
[[Page 76782]]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
before an agency submits a proposed collection of information to OMB
for approval, it must publish a document in the Federal Register
providing a 60-day comment period and otherwise consult with members of
the public and affected agencies concerning each proposed collection of
information. The OMB has promulgated regulations describing what must
be included in such a document. Under OMB's regulations (at 5 CFR
1320.8(d)), an agency must ask for public comment on the following:
(i) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have practical utility;
(ii) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(iii) how to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
(iv) how to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses.
In compliance with these requirements, NHTSA asks public comment on
the following proposed revision of the previously approved collection
of information, OMB 2127-0646:
Evaluation Surveys for Impaired Driving and Seat Belt Interventions
Type of Request--Revision of the previously approved collection of
information.
OMB Clearance Number--2127-0646.
Form Number--NHTSA 1010, NHTSA 1011.
Requested Expiration Date of Approval--3 years from date of
approval.
Summary of the Collection of Information--The National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) proposes to conduct telephone
surveys to evaluate interventions designed to increase seat belt use
and reduce alcohol-impaired driving. Sample sizes would range from 200
to 2000 depending on the geographic unit being surveyed (Nation,
Region, State, Community) and the evaluation design for the
intervention (e.g., number of analytic groups). Interview length would
be 10 minutes. The surveys would collect information on attitudes,
awareness, knowledge, and behavior related to the intervention. The
surveys would follow a pre-post design where they are administered
prior to the implementation of the intervention and after its
conclusion. Interim survey waves may also be administered if the
duration of the intervention permits.
In conducting the proposed surveys, the interviewers would use
computer-assisted telephone interviewing to reduce interview length and
minimize recording errors. The proposed surveys would be anonymous.
Description of the Need for the Information and Proposed Use of the
Information--NHTSA was established to reduce the number of deaths,
injuries, and economic losses resulting from motor vehicle crashes on
the Nation's highways. As part of this statutory mandate, NHTSA is
authorized to conduct research as a foundation for the development of
motor vehicle standards and traffic safety programs.
The heavy toll that alcohol-impaired driving exacts on the nation
in fatalities, injuries, and economic costs is well documented. In
addition, non-use of seat belts continues to contribute significantly
to the number of traffic fatalities. The persistence of these traffic
safety problems points to an ongoing need for effective interventions
to address alcohol-impaired driving and non-use of seat belts. This in
turn calls for strong evaluation efforts to identify what interventions
are effective.
The Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity
Act: A Legacy For Users (SAFETEA-LU) is a funding and authorization
bill that governs United States federal Surface Transportation
spending. Signed into law in 2005, sections within the law have
stimulated heightened program activity to reduce alcohol-impaired
driving and increase seat belt use. Under section 410 of SAFETEA-LU,
spending authority for State grants to implement alcohol-impaired
driving countermeasures rose from slightly under $40 million in 2005 to
$139 million in 2009. To be eligible for the grants, States had to
carry out a specified number of programs from the following list:
Statewide checkpoints and/or saturation patrols, prosecution and
adjudication outreach programs, increased rate of BAC testing of
drivers in fatal crashes, stronger sanctions for high-risk drivers with
BACs of 0.15 percent or more, effective alcohol rehabilitation for
repeat offenders or a program to refer them to DWI courts, underage
drinking prevention programs, administrative license suspension or
revocation for DUI, and self-sustaining impaired driving prevention
programs. Section 406 of SAFETEA-LU set the funding authority for State
seat belt performance grants at $124.5 million per year between 2006
and 2009. States were eligible for the grants based on specified seat
belt performance criteria. Under Section 405 of SAFETEA-LU, funding
authority for State occupant protection incentive grants increased from
$19.84 million in 2005 to $25 million in 2009. Grant eligibility was
based on specified criteria regarding the presence of occupant
protection programs, laws, and associated penalties for violation. Use
of grant funds was restricted to implementing and enforcing occupant
protection programs. Section 2009 of SAFETEA-LU established a new
program to administer at least 2 high visibility enforcement programs
to increase seat belt use and/or reduce alcohol-impaired or drug-
impaired driving. Grant funds could be used for the development,
production, and use of broadcast and print media in carrying out
traffic safety law enforcement campaigns.
Funding of these programs has continued with extension of SAFETEA-
LU into fiscal years 2010 and 2011. NHTSA needs to be prepared for
inclusion of the programs in the upcoming Surface Transportation
Reauthorization. This means maintaining a strong evaluation program
that monitors the effectiveness of intervention models being
implemented under this funded intervention activity, and identifies
where changes are needed. Telephone surveys have been an important
component in NHTSA's evaluation activity. They have been used to
measure public awareness of intervention campaigns, penetration of
campaign messages, and perceived risk of negative consequences from
engaging in proscribed behavior. The surveys have typically followed a
pre-post design, where differences between an initial baseline survey
wave and a later survey wave were associated with an intervening
intervention. NHTSA has found such surveys to be valuable in assessing
the multi-million dollar national media campaigns conducted for the
National Alcohol Crackdowns and the National Click It or Ticket
Mobilizations. They also have been useful in evaluating localized
programs that tested variants of intervention models by providing
information to assess campaign communications or interpret collected
behavioral measures. With seat belt and impaired driving intervention
activity anticipated to remain heavy for the foreseeable future, there
is a need for NHTSA to continue to apply these data collection
[[Page 76783]]
techniques to see if the campaigns are achieving their objectives.
Description of the Likely Respondents (Including Estimated Number,
and Proposed Frequency of Response to the Collection of Information)--
Over the next 3 years, NHTSA intends to conduct National telephone
surveys to collect data from 36,000 participants. For the National
Alcohol Crackdown, 2 sets of pre/post intervention surveys, each with
sample sizes of 1,500, will be administered annually for 3 years.
Similarly, for the National Click It or Ticket Mobilization, 2 sets of
pre/post intervention surveys, each with sample sizes of 1,500, will be
administered annually for 3 years.
In conducting one or more of the National surveys, NHTSA may have a
need to collect information to assess localized activity associated
with the National Alcohol Crackdown or National Click It or Ticket
Mobilization. This would involve augmentation of the pre- and post-
national sample with one or more Regional, State, or Community samples.
These samples will range from 200 to 2,000. Typically they will be
approximately 500. NHTSA intends to complete a maximum of 24,000 of
these localized interviews over the next three years.
In addition to the surveys associated with the National Alcohol
Crackdown and National Click It or Ticket Mobilization, NHTSA intends
to conduct telephone surveys to assess selected demonstrations of
interventions designed to reduce alcohol-impaired driving and/or
increase seat belt use. The surveys will follow a pre-post design.
Interventions sustained over an extended period of time may add one or
more interim survey waves. Typically, a State demonstration survey will
require 500 participants per survey wave. A regional demonstration can
range from as few as 200 participants for a small county to 2,000
participants for a Region covering more than one State. NHTSA intends
to complete a maximum of 40,800 of these interviews over the next three
years.
Interviews will be conducted with persons at residential phone
numbers selected using random digit dialing. For interviews conducted
with persons using landline phones, no more than one respondent per
household will be selected. For interviews conducted with persons on
cell phones, a single user of the cell phone will be selected. Each
sample member will complete just one interview. Businesses are
ineligible for the sample and would not be interviewed.
Estimate of the Total Annual Reporting and Record Keeping Burden
Resulting from the Collection of Information--NHTSA estimates that
respondents in the sample would require an average of 10 minutes to
complete the telephone interviews. The annual estimated reporting
burden on the general public for the National surveys would be a
maximum of 2,000 hours to conduct 12,000 interviews. Over the requested
three year period, this would be 6,000 hours to conduct 36,000
interviews. The annual estimated reporting burden on the general public
for the localized Crackdown and Mobilization surveys would be a maximum
of 1,333.33 hours to conduct 8,000 interviews. Over the requested three
year period, this would be 4,000 hours to conduct 24,000 interviews.
The annual estimated reporting burden on the general public for the
demonstration project surveys would be a maximum of 2,266.67 hours to
conduct 13,600 interviews. Over the requested three year period, this
would be 6,800 hours to conduct 40,800 interviews. In total, the annual
estimated reporting burden on the public would be a maximum of 5,600
hours to conduct 33,600 interviews. Over the requested three year
period this would be 16,800 hours to conduct 100,800 interviews. The
respondents would not incur any reporting cost from the information
collection. The respondents also would not incur any record keeping
burden or record keeping cost from the information collection.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. Section 3506(c)(2)(A)
Jeffrey Michael,
Associate Administrator, Research and Program Development.
[FR Doc. 2010-30975 Filed 12-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P