Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Securities Clearing Corporation; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Procedure II of the NSCC Rules & Procedures To Modify the Money Tolerance Comparison Provisions for Fixed Income Securities, 76515-76517 [2010-30880]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 8, 2010 / Notices
Exchange when certain Customer
options orders are routed to CBOE 8 as
well as when certain Professional
options orders are routed to the various
destination markets. Each destination
market’s transaction charge varies and
there is a standard clearing charge for
each transaction incurred by the
Exchange. The Exchange believes that
the routing fees proposed will enable
the Exchange to recover the transaction
fees assessed by away markets, where
applicable, plus clearing fees for the
execution of Customer, Firm, Market
Maker and Professional orders. As with
all fees, the Exchange may adjust these
Routing Fees in response to competitive
conditions by filing a new proposed rule
change.
While fee changes pursuant to this
proposal are effective upon filing, the
Exchange has designated these changes
to be operative on December 1, 2010.
2. Statutory Basis
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
NASDAQ believes that the proposed
rule changes are consistent with the
provisions of Section 6 of the Act,9 in
general, and with Section 6(b)(4) of the
Act,10 in particular, in that it provides
for the equitable allocation of reasonable
dues, fees and other charges among
members and issuers and other persons
using any facility or system which
NASDAQ operates or controls.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed fees are reasonable because
they seek to recoup costs that are
incurred by the Exchange when routing
Customer orders greater than 99
contracts in NDX, MNX, ETFs, ETNs
and HOLDRs to CBOE and also when
routing orders designated as
Professional to the various destination
markets listed herein, on behalf of its
members. The Exchange also believes
that the proposed fees are equitable
because they will be uniformly applied
to all Customers and Professionals.
NASDAQ is one of nine options
markets in the national market system
for standardized options. Joining
NASDAQ and electing to trade options
is entirely voluntary. Under these
circumstances, NASDAQ’s fees must be
competitive and low in order for
NASDAQ to attract order flow, execute
orders, and grow as a market. NASDAQ
thus believes that its fees are fair and
8 See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62902
(September 14, 2010), 75 FR 57313 (September 20,
2010) (SR–CBOE–2010–081) (a rule change to assess
a transaction fee of $.18 per contract on public
customer orders in options on Standard & Poor’s
Depositary Receipts, except for orders of 99
contracts or less).
9 15 U.S.C. 78f.
10 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:23 Dec 07, 2010
Jkt 223001
reasonable and consistent with the
Exchange Act.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act 11 and
paragraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b–4 12
thereunder. At any time within 60 days
of the filing of the proposed rule change,
the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml; or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–NASDAQ–2010–149 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NASDAQ–2010–149. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro/shtml. Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing
also will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. All comments received will
be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File No. SR–NASDAQ–
2010–149 and should be submitted on
or before December 29, 2010.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.13
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010–30833 Filed 12–7–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–63404; File No. SR–NSCC–
2010–16]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
National Securities Clearing
Corporation; Notice of Filing of
Proposed Rule Change To Amend
Procedure II of the NSCC Rules &
Procedures To Modify the Money
Tolerance Comparison Provisions for
Fixed Income Securities
December 1, 2010.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder 2
notice is hereby given that on November
19, 2010, the National Securities
13 17
11 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
12 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
PO 00000
Frm 00123
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
76515
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
76516
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 8, 2010 / Notices
Clearing Corporation (‘‘NSCC’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which items have
been prepared primarily by NSCC.3 The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of the Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The purpose of this proposed rule
change is to amend Procedure II (‘‘Trade
Comparison and Recording Service’’) of
the NSCC Rules & Procedures to modify
the money tolerance comparison
provisions for fixed income securities.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission,
NSCC included statements concerning
the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed
rule change. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in Item IV below. NSCC has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections (A), (B),
and (C) below, of the most significant
aspects of these statements.4
(A) Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Trade Comparison and Recording
Service
NSCC provides a Real-Time Trade
Matching (‘‘RTTM’’) service for trade
input and comparison of corporate
bond, municipal bond, and unit
investment trust (collectively ‘‘CMU’’)
fixed income securities. Matching
requires that the two trade
counterparties submit certain required
trade details to RTTM that either match
exactly or fall within predefined
parameters. If the trade details are
matched within RTTM, a valid and
binding contract between the submitting
trade parties results. If the purchaser
and seller submit trade data that
matches in all required aspects except
for trade value, NSCC uses the seller’s
money (referred to as ‘‘seller’s value’’) as
the trade value and deems the trade
compared as long as the difference
3 The text of the proposed rule change is attached
as Exhibit 5 to NSCC’s filing and is available at
https://www.dtcc.com/downloads/legal/rule_filings/
2010/nscc/2010-16.pdf.
4 The Commission has modified the text of the
summaries prepared by NSCC.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:23 Dec 07, 2010
Jkt 223001
between the seller’s submitted trade
value and the buyer’s submitted trade
value falls within prescribed dollar
values as more fully described below.
Currently, Procedure II of NSCC’s
Rules & Procedures provides two
scenarios in which trades are compared
using the seller’s value. In the first
scenario, NSCC will use the seller’s
value to match a trade submitted prior
to the cut-off time for intraday
comparison if the respective trade
parties have submitted contract amounts
that are within (1) a net $2 difference for
trades of $1 million or less and (2) $2
per million for trades greater than $1
million. In the second scenario, NSCC
will also use the seller’s value during
the end-of-day enhanced comparison
process to match a trade that remained
uncompared after the intraday
comparison process if the contract
amounts are within (i) a net $10.00
difference for trades of $100,000 or less
and (ii) $.10 per $1,000 for trades greater
than $100,000.
Proposed Amendments to NSCC
Procedure II
Since the establishment of these CMU
money tolerance amounts in 1995,
member firms have significantly
improved the timing and accuracy of
fixed income trade reporting. In 2005,
the Municipal Securities Rulemaking
Board (‘‘MSRB’’) instituted a
requirement that firms report trades in
municipal securities to the RTTM
engine within 15 minutes. This, in turn,
required member firms to improve their
reporting accuracy and technology. As a
result, RTTM is matching a greater
percentage of CMU trades upon initial
trade input from the buyer and seller.
NSCC believes that because of these
improvements, the current money
tolerance is wider than needed. NSCC
believes that best practices dictates that
the money tolerance be modified to
reflect current business conditions.
Accordingly, NSCC is proposing to
amend the CMU money tolerance for the
second scenario in which trades are
compared using the seller’s value.
Transactions that remain uncompared
after the intraday comparison process
shall be deemed compared during the
end-of-day enhanced comparison
process if the seller’s value has a net
$10.00 difference for trades of $250,000
or less and $0.04 per $1,000 for trades
greater than $250,000. NSCC members
will be advised of the implementation
date through the issuance of an NSCC
Important Notice.
Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act
requires, among other things, that the
rules of a clearing agency be designed to
promote the prompt and accurate
PO 00000
Frm 00124
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
clearance and settlement of securities
transactions.5 The proposed rule change
is consistent with the requirements of
the Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to NSCC because
it should enhance the efficiency of
NSCC’s clearance and settlement
processes and should therefore better
enable NSCC to facilitate the prompt
and accurate clearance and settlement of
securities transactions.
(B) Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
NSCC does not believe that the
proposed rule change would impose any
burden on competition.
(C) Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants or Others
Written comments relating to the
proposed rule change have not been
solicited or received. NSCC will notify
the Commission of any written
comments received by NSCC.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within forty-five days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such longer period (i)
as the Commission may designate up to
ninety days of such date if it finds such
longer period to be appropriate and
publishes its reasons for so finding or
(ii) as to which the self-regulatory
organization consents, the Commission
will:
(A) By order approve or disapprove
the proposed rule change, or
(B) Institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml) or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–NSCC–2010–16 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
5 15
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F).
08DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 8, 2010 / Notices
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NSCC–2010–16. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Section, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filings
will also be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of NSCC
and on NSCC’s Web site at https://www.
dtcc.com/downloads/legal/rule_filings/
2010/nscc/2010-16.pdf. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–NSCC–
2010–16 and should be submitted on or
before December 29, 2010.
For the Commission by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.6
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010–30880 Filed 12–7–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
Data Collection Available for Public
Comments and Recommendations
Notice and request for
comments.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
ACTION:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice announces the Small Business
Administration’s intentions to request
approval on a new and/or currently
approved information collection.
SUMMARY:
6 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:23 Dec 07, 2010
Jkt 223001
Submit comments on or before
February 7, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Send all comments
regarding whether this information
collection is necessary for the proper
performance of the function of the
agency, whether the burden estimates
are accurate, and if there are ways to
minimize the estimated burden and
enhance the quality of the collection, to
Gail Hepler, Chief 7(a) Program Branch,
Office of Financial Assistance, Small
Business Administration, 409 3rd Street,
8th Floor, Washington, DC 20416.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gail
Hepler, Chief 7(a) Program Branch,
Office of Financial Assistance, 202–
205–7530, Curtis B. Rich, Management
Analyst, 202–205–7030,
curtis.rich@sba.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This form
is used to assist homeowners (20% or
greater owners, corporate officers, or has
guarantors) in preparing their total net
worth by listing all of their assets and
liabilities, including current income.
Title: ‘‘Personal Financial Statement.’’
Description of Respondents: SBA
participating Guaranty Agreement.
Form Number: 413.
Annual Responses: 91,937.
Annual Burden: 137,095.
DATES:
Jacqueline White,
Chief, Administrative Information Branch.
76517
A.
Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance,
U.S. Small Business Administration,
409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050,
Washington, DC 20416.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice
of the President’s major disaster
declaration for Private Non-Profit
organizations in the Commonwealth of
Puerto Rico, dated 10/26/2010, is hereby
amended to include the following areas
as adversely affected by the disaster.
Primary Municipalities: Cayey, Ciales,
Corozal, San Lorenzo.
All other information in the original
declaration remains unchanged.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Numbers 59002 and 59008)
Roger B. Garland,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010–30837 Filed 12–7–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
[FTA Docket No. 2010–0043]
Agency Information Collection Activity
under OMB Review
AGENCY:
[FR Doc. 2010–30835 Filed 12–7–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
ACTION:
Federal Transit Administration,
DOT.
Notice of request for comments.
The Federal Transit
Administration invites public comment
about our intention to request the Office
of Management and Budget’s (OMB)
approval to renew the following
information collection:
Pre-Award and Post-Delivery Review
Requirements.
The information collected on the
certification forms is necessary for
FTA’s grantees to meet the requirements
of 49 U.S.C. Section 5323(m). The
Federal Register notice with a 60-day
comment period soliciting comments
was published on September 2, 2010.
DATES: Comments must be submitted
before January 7, 2011. A comment to
OMB is most effective if OMB receives
it within 30 days of publication.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sylvia L. Marion, Office of
Administration, Office of Management
Planning, (202) 366–6680.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Pre-Award and Post-Delivery
Review Requirements.
Abstract: Under the Federal Transit
Laws, at 49 U.S.C. 5323(m), grantees
must certify that Pre-Award and PostDelivery Reviews will be conducted
SUMMARY:
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
[Disaster Declaration #12368 and #12369]
Puerto Rico Disaster Number PR–
00012
U.S. Small Business
Administration.
ACTION: Amendment 2.
AGENCY:
This is an amendment of the
Presidential declaration of a major
disaster for Public Assistance Only for
the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
(FEMA–1946–DR), dated 10/26/2010.
Incident: Severe Storms, Flooding,
Mudslides, and Landslides associated
with Tropical Storm Otto.
Incident Period: 10/04/2010 through
10/08/2010.
Effective Date: 11/29/2010.
Physical Loan Application Deadline
Date: 12/27/2010.
Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan
Application Deadline Date: 07/26/2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan
applications to: U.S. Small Business
Administration, Processing And
Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00125
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 235 (Wednesday, December 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76515-76517]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30880]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-63404; File No. SR-NSCC-2010-16]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Securities Clearing
Corporation; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Amend
Procedure II of the NSCC Rules & Procedures To Modify the Money
Tolerance Comparison Provisions for Fixed Income Securities
December 1, 2010.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder \2\ notice is hereby given that
on November 19, 2010, the National Securities
[[Page 76516]]
Clearing Corporation (``NSCC'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which items have been prepared primarily by
NSCC.\3\ The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments
on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ The text of the proposed rule change is attached as Exhibit
5 to NSCC's filing and is available at https://www.dtcc.com/downloads/legal/rule_filings/2010/nscc/2010-16.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
The purpose of this proposed rule change is to amend Procedure II
(``Trade Comparison and Recording Service'') of the NSCC Rules &
Procedures to modify the money tolerance comparison provisions for
fixed income securities.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, NSCC included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. NSCC has prepared summaries, set forth in sections (A),
(B), and (C) below, of the most significant aspects of these
statements.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The Commission has modified the text of the summaries
prepared by NSCC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(A) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
Trade Comparison and Recording Service
NSCC provides a Real-Time Trade Matching (``RTTM'') service for
trade input and comparison of corporate bond, municipal bond, and unit
investment trust (collectively ``CMU'') fixed income securities.
Matching requires that the two trade counterparties submit certain
required trade details to RTTM that either match exactly or fall within
predefined parameters. If the trade details are matched within RTTM, a
valid and binding contract between the submitting trade parties
results. If the purchaser and seller submit trade data that matches in
all required aspects except for trade value, NSCC uses the seller's
money (referred to as ``seller's value'') as the trade value and deems
the trade compared as long as the difference between the seller's
submitted trade value and the buyer's submitted trade value falls
within prescribed dollar values as more fully described below.
Currently, Procedure II of NSCC's Rules & Procedures provides two
scenarios in which trades are compared using the seller's value. In the
first scenario, NSCC will use the seller's value to match a trade
submitted prior to the cut-off time for intraday comparison if the
respective trade parties have submitted contract amounts that are
within (1) a net $2 difference for trades of $1 million or less and (2)
$2 per million for trades greater than $1 million. In the second
scenario, NSCC will also use the seller's value during the end-of-day
enhanced comparison process to match a trade that remained uncompared
after the intraday comparison process if the contract amounts are
within (i) a net $10.00 difference for trades of $100,000 or less and
(ii) $.10 per $1,000 for trades greater than $100,000.
Proposed Amendments to NSCC Procedure II
Since the establishment of these CMU money tolerance amounts in
1995, member firms have significantly improved the timing and accuracy
of fixed income trade reporting. In 2005, the Municipal Securities
Rulemaking Board (``MSRB'') instituted a requirement that firms report
trades in municipal securities to the RTTM engine within 15 minutes.
This, in turn, required member firms to improve their reporting
accuracy and technology. As a result, RTTM is matching a greater
percentage of CMU trades upon initial trade input from the buyer and
seller.
NSCC believes that because of these improvements, the current money
tolerance is wider than needed. NSCC believes that best practices
dictates that the money tolerance be modified to reflect current
business conditions. Accordingly, NSCC is proposing to amend the CMU
money tolerance for the second scenario in which trades are compared
using the seller's value. Transactions that remain uncompared after the
intraday comparison process shall be deemed compared during the end-of-
day enhanced comparison process if the seller's value has a net $10.00
difference for trades of $250,000 or less and $0.04 per $1,000 for
trades greater than $250,000. NSCC members will be advised of the
implementation date through the issuance of an NSCC Important Notice.
Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act requires, among other things, that
the rules of a clearing agency be designed to promote the prompt and
accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions.\5\ The
proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and
the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to NSCC because it
should enhance the efficiency of NSCC's clearance and settlement
processes and should therefore better enable NSCC to facilitate the
prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities
transactions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(B) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
NSCC does not believe that the proposed rule change would impose
any burden on competition.
(C) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others
Written comments relating to the proposed rule change have not been
solicited or received. NSCC will notify the Commission of any written
comments received by NSCC.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within forty-five days of the date of publication of this notice in
the Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission
may designate up to ninety days of such date if it finds such longer
period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or
(ii) as to which the self-regulatory organization consents, the
Commission will:
(A) By order approve or disapprove the proposed rule change, or
(B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml) or
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-NSCC-2010-16 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary,
[[Page 76517]]
Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NSCC-2010-16. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Section, 100 F Street,
NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090, on official business days between the
hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filings will also be
available for inspection and copying at the principal office of NSCC
and on NSCC's Web site at https://www.dtcc.com/downloads/legal/rule_filings/2010/nscc/2010-16.pdf. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-NSCC-2010-16 and should be submitted on or before
December 29, 2010.
For the Commission by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-30880 Filed 12-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P