Certain Electronic Paper Towel Dispensing Devices and Components Thereof; Notice of Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Complainant's Motion To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation, 76485-76486 [2010-30857]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 8, 2010 / Notices the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. These final supplementary rules do not conflict with any Idaho State law or regulation. Therefore, in accordance with Executive Order 13132, the BLM has determined that these final supplementary rules do not have sufficient Federalism implications to warrant preparation of a Federalism Assessment. Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform Under Executive Order 12988, the Idaho State Office of the BLM has determined that these final supplementary rules do not unduly burden the judicial system and meet the requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of the Order. Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments In accordance with Executive Order 13175, the BLM found that these supplementary rules would not include policies that have Tribal implications. Since the rules do not change BLM policy and do not involve Tribal lands, resources, or religious rights, the BLM has determined that additional Tribal consultation is not necessary. jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Paperwork Reduction Act These final supplementary rules do not contain any information collection that the Office of Management and Budget must approve under the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. Any information collection that may result from Federal criminal investigations or prosecutions conducted under these proposed supplementary rules is exempt from the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, as provided at 44 U.S.C. 3518(c)(1). National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) The BLM prepared an EA (ID–410– 2008–EA–60) and an associated Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for the BCBRPP, for which a Decision Record was issued January 9, 2009. The proposed rules and their environmental effects were analyzed in the EA, and the Decision Record adopted the supplementary rules. The supplementary rules are consistent with and necessary to carry out the direction of the RMP and the BCBRPP. They establish rules of conduct for public use within the BCBRMA to protect public health and safety and improve the protection of the resources. The BLM VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:23 Dec 07, 2010 Jkt 223001 has placed the EA, FONSI and Decision Record on file in the BLM Administrative Record at the address specified in the ADDRESSES section. Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use These final supplementary rules do not comprise a significant energy action. The supplementary rules do not have an adverse effect on energy supplies, production, or consumption. They have no connection with energy policy. Author The principal author of this supplementary rule is Brian White, Outdoor Recreation Planner, Coeur d’Alene Field Office, Bureau of Land Management. For the reasons stated in the preamble, and under the authority for supplementary rules found at 43 U.S.C. 1740 and 43 CFR 8365.1–6, the Idaho State Director, Bureau of Land Management, issues supplementary rules for public lands managed by the BLM in Idaho, to read as follows: Supplementary Rules for Blue Creek Bay Recreation Management Area These final supplementary rules apply, except as specifically exempted, to the following described public land comprising the entire 736-acre Blue Creek Bay Recreation Management Area, all of which are contiguous lands in Boise Meridian, Kootenai County, Idaho: T. 50 N., R. 2 W., Section 31: lots 5, 6, 7, 8, and E1⁄2 NE1⁄4 SW1⁄4. T. 50 N., R. 3 W., Sec. 26: portion of SW1⁄4 south and west of Sunnyside Road and Sec. 35: portions of lots 1, 2, 7 above Sunnyside Road; lots 4, 5, 6, and N1⁄2 NW1⁄4, W1⁄2 NE1⁄4. T. 49 N., R. 2 W., Sec. 6: lot 4. T. 49 N., R. 3 W., Sec. 1: portions of lots 1, 2, 5, 6 above Yellowstone Road. Containing 736 acres more or less. 1. You must not occupy or use the Blue Creek Bay public lands from one hour after sundown to one hour before sunrise. 2. You must not moor any boat overnight on any BLM-managed structure or shoreline. 3. You must not start or maintain any open campfires, except when completely contained within permanently installed steel fire grates or cooking grills. 4. You must not discharge a firearm (powered by compressed gas or gunpowder) for hunting, target practice or other purposes, except that: PO 00000 Frm 00093 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 76485 A. Waterfowl hunters may hunt waterfowl below the high water mark of Lake Coeur d’Alene within Blue Creek Bay. 5. You must not use motor vehicles off county roads. 6. You must not cut or collect firewood. Exceptions These supplementary rules do not apply to emergency, law enforcement, and Federal or other government entities while conducting official or emergency duties. Motor vehicle restrictions likewise do not apply to emergency, law enforcement, and Federal or other government motor vehicles while conducting official or emergency duties. Exemptions to these supplementary rules may be granted on a case-by-case basis as deemed appropriate by the Authorized Officer. The prohibition of discharging a firearm in rule 4 has no effect on hunting by licensed hunters in legitimate pursuit of waterfowl on lands managed by Idaho Department of Lands during the proper season with appropriate firearms. Penalties: Any person who violates any of these supplementary rules may be tried before a United States Magistrate and fined up to $1,000, imprisoned for up to 12 months, or both, in accordance with 43 U.S.C. 1733(a) and 43 CFR 8360.0–7. Such violations may also be subject to the enhanced fines provided for by 18 U.S.C. 3571. In accordance with 43 CFR 8365.1–7, State or local officials may also impose penalties for violations of Idaho law. Peter J. Ditton, Acting Idaho State Director. [FR Doc. 2010–30717 Filed 12–7–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–GG–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–718] Certain Electronic Paper Towel Dispensing Devices and Components Thereof; Notice of Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Complainant’s Motion To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative law SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM 08DEN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 76486 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 8, 2010 / Notices judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 23) granting complainant’s motion to amend the complaint and notice of investigation. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James A. Worth, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–3065. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on May 21, 2010, based on a complaint filed by Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products LP of Atlanta, Georgia (‘‘Georgia-Pacific’’), alleging violations of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain electronic paper towel dispensing devices and components thereof by reason of infringement of certain claims of United States Patent Nos. 6,871,815; 7,017,856; 7,182,289; and 7,387,274. 75 FR 28651– 2 (May 21, 2010). The complainant named as respondents Kruger Products LP of Mississauga, Canada (‘‘Kruger’’); KTG USA LP of Memphis, Tennessee (‘‘KTG USA’’); Stefco Industries, Inc. of Haines City, Florida (‘‘Stefco’’); Cellynne Corporation of Haines City, Florida (‘‘Cellyne’’); Draco Hygienic Products Inc. of Ontario, California; NetPak Electronic Plastic and Cosmetic, Inc., d/ b/a/Open for Business of Chicago, Illinois (‘‘NetPak Chicago’’); NetPak Electronik Plastik ve Kozmetik Sanayi, Ve Ticaret Ltd of Izmir, Turkey (‘‘NetPak Turkey’’); Paradigm Marketing Consortium, Inc. of Syosset, New York; United Sourcing Network Corp. of Syosset, New York; New Choice (H.K.) Ltd. of Shatin, Hong Kong; and Vida International Inc. of Taipei, Taiwan. On August 16, 2010, the Commission issued notice of its determination not to review an ID amending the complaint VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:23 Dec 07, 2010 Jkt 223001 and notice of investigation: (1) To correct the corporate name of NetPak Chicago; (2) to redefine ‘‘Kruger’’ to ‘‘Kruger Products and/or KTG USA’’; (3) to indicate that Georgia-Pacific no longer alleges that NetPak Turkey is the source of Stefco’s and Cellynne’s accused product; (4) to add new respondents Jet Power International Limited; Winco Industries Co.; DWL Industries Co.; Ko-Am Corporation Inc. d/b/a Janitor’s World; Natury, S.A. De C.V.; Update International Inc.; and AIM. On October 25, 2010, Georgia-Pacific filed a motion seeking to further amend the complaint and notice of investigation to correct the corporate name of the respondent originally identified as ‘‘Update International Inc.’’ to ‘‘Franklin Financial Management, Inc. d/b/a Update International’’ of California, and to make certain other technical corrections. On November 10, 2010, the ALJ issued Order No. 23, granting the motion. No petitions for review were filed. The Commission has determined not to review the ID. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in section 210.42 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.42). By order of the Commission. Issued: December 3, 2010. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2010–30857 Filed 12–7–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P JOINT BOARD FOR THE ENROLLMENT OF ACTUARIES Meeting of the Advisory Committee; Meeting Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries. ACTION: Notice of Federal Advisory Committee meeting. AGENCY: The Executive Director of the Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries gives notice of a meeting of the Advisory Committee on Actuarial Examinations (portions of which will be open to the public) in Washington, DC at the Office of Professional Responsibility on January 6 and 7, 2011. DATES: Thursday, January 6, 2011, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., and Friday, January 7, 2011, from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Internal Revenue Service, 1111 SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00094 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick W. McDonough, Executive Director of the Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries, 202–622–8225. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the Advisory Committee on Actuarial Examinations will meet at the Internal Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC, on Thursday, January 6, 2011, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., and Friday, January 7, 2011, from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss topics and questions that may be recommended for inclusion on future Joint Board examinations in actuarial mathematics and methodology referred to in 29 U.S.C. 1242(a)(1)(B) and to review the November 2010 Pension (EA–2A) Joint Board Examination in order to make recommendations relative thereto, including the minimum acceptable pass score. Topics for inclusion on the syllabus for the Joint Board’s examination program for the May 2011 Basic (EA–1) Examination and the May 2011 Pension (EA–2B) Examination will be discussed. A determination has been made as required by section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App., that the portions of the meeting dealing with the discussion of questions that may appear on the Joint Board’s examinations and the review of the November 2010 Joint Board examination fall within the exceptions to the open meeting requirement set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B), and that the public interest requires that such portions be closed to public participation. The portion of the meeting dealing with the discussion of the other topics will commence at 1 p.m. on January 6 and will continue for as long as necessary to complete the discussion, but not beyond 3 p.m. Time permitting, after the close of this discussion by Committee members, interested persons may make statements germane to this subject. Persons wishing to make oral statements should notify the Executive Director in writing prior to the meeting in order to aid in scheduling the time available and should submit the written text, or at a minimum, an outline of comments they propose to make orally. Such comments will be limited to 10 minutes in length. All persons planning to attend the public session should notify the Executive Director in writing to obtain building entry. Notifications of intent to make an oral statement or to attend must be faxed, no later than December 31, 2010, to 202–622–8300, E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM 08DEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 235 (Wednesday, December 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76485-76486]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30857]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-718]


Certain Electronic Paper Towel Dispensing Devices and Components 
Thereof; Notice of Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial 
Determination Granting Complainant's Motion To Amend the Complaint and 
Notice of Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative 
law

[[Page 76486]]

judge's (``ALJ'') initial determination (``ID'') (Order No. 23) 
granting complainant's motion to amend the complaint and notice of 
investigation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James A. Worth, Office of the General 
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-3065. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the 
Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at 
http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be 
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information 
on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD 
terminal on (202) 205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on May 21, 2010, based on a complaint filed by Georgia-Pacific Consumer 
Products LP of Atlanta, Georgia (``Georgia-Pacific''), alleging 
violations of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in 
the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and 
the sale within the United States after importation of certain 
electronic paper towel dispensing devices and components thereof by 
reason of infringement of certain claims of United States Patent Nos. 
6,871,815; 7,017,856; 7,182,289; and 7,387,274. 75 FR 28651-2 (May 21, 
2010). The complainant named as respondents Kruger Products LP of 
Mississauga, Canada (``Kruger''); KTG USA LP of Memphis, Tennessee 
(``KTG USA''); Stefco Industries, Inc. of Haines City, Florida 
(``Stefco''); Cellynne Corporation of Haines City, Florida 
(``Cellyne''); Draco Hygienic Products Inc. of Ontario, California; 
NetPak Electronic Plastic and Cosmetic, Inc., d/b/a/Open for Business 
of Chicago, Illinois (``NetPak Chicago''); NetPak Electronik Plastik ve 
Kozmetik Sanayi, Ve Ticaret Ltd of Izmir, Turkey (``NetPak Turkey''); 
Paradigm Marketing Consortium, Inc. of Syosset, New York; United 
Sourcing Network Corp. of Syosset, New York; New Choice (H.K.) Ltd. of 
Shatin, Hong Kong; and Vida International Inc. of Taipei, Taiwan.
    On August 16, 2010, the Commission issued notice of its 
determination not to review an ID amending the complaint and notice of 
investigation: (1) To correct the corporate name of NetPak Chicago; (2) 
to redefine ``Kruger'' to ``Kruger Products and/or KTG USA''; (3) to 
indicate that Georgia-Pacific no longer alleges that NetPak Turkey is 
the source of Stefco's and Cellynne's accused product; (4) to add new 
respondents Jet Power International Limited; Winco Industries Co.; DWL 
Industries Co.; Ko-Am Corporation Inc. d/b/a Janitor's World; Natury, 
S.A. De C.V.; Update International Inc.; and AIM.
    On October 25, 2010, Georgia-Pacific filed a motion seeking to 
further amend the complaint and notice of investigation to correct the 
corporate name of the respondent originally identified as ``Update 
International Inc.'' to ``Franklin Financial Management, Inc. d/b/a 
Update International'' of California, and to make certain other 
technical corrections. On November 10, 2010, the ALJ issued Order No. 
23, granting the motion. No petitions for review were filed.
    The Commission has determined not to review the ID.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in section 210.42 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure 
(19 CFR 210.42).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: December 3, 2010.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-30857 Filed 12-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P