Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings From Japan, Korea, and Taiwan, 76025 [2010-30611]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 7, 2010 / Notices
patent’’). The complaint in the
underlying investigation named as
respondents SiRF Technology, Inc.
(‘‘SiRF’’), E–TEN Corp. (‘‘E–TEN’’),
Pharos Science & Applications, Inc.
(‘‘Pharos’’), MiTAC International
Corporation (‘‘MiTAC’’), and Mio
Technology Limited (‘‘Mio’’)
(collectively, ‘‘Respondents’’).
On January 15, 2009, the Commission
found a violation of section 337 by
Respondents by reason of infringement
of all six asserted patents. The
Commission issued a limited exclusion
and cease-and-desist orders against
SiRF, Pharos, and Mio. The remedial
orders are directed to GPS devices and
products containing the same that
infringe or are covered by certain claims
of the ‘346, ‘651, ‘000, ‘080, ‘187, and/
or ‘801 patents. Respondents
subsequently appealed the
Commission’s final determination to the
United States Court of Appeals for
Federal Circuit (‘‘Federal Circuit’’). In a
precedential opinion issued April 12,
2010, the Federal Circuit affirmed the
Commission’s Final Determination in all
respects.
On August 16, 2010, the Commission
instituted modification proceedings
under 19 CFR 210.76 based on a petition
for modification filed by Respondents.
At the same time, the Commission
denied a petition for modification filed
by Broadcom. The modification
proceedings are currently ongoing.
On October 7, 2010, Broadcom filed a
complaint seeking institution of a
formal enforcement proceeding to
enforce the limited exclusion order and
cease-and-desist orders against
Respondents under Commission rule
210.75(b), 19 CFR 210.75(b). The
enforcement complaint named SiRF,
MiTAC, Mio, Pharos, E–TEN, MiTAC
Digitial Corporation (‘‘MiTAC Digital’’),
and CSR plc (‘‘CSR’’) as proposed
enforcement respondents. Shortly after
the enforcement complaint was filed,
Broadcom withdrew its allegations with
respect to E–TEN.
On October 22, 2010, the proposed
enforcement respondents filed a motion
with the Commission requesting
sanctions against Broadcom. The motion
alleges, among other things, that
Broadcom’s enforcement complaint
does not comply with Commission rule
210.4(c), 19 CFR 210.4(c), regarding
representations made to the
Commission. On November 3, 2010,
Broadcom opposed the motion. On
November 9, 2010, the proposed
enforcement respondents filed a motion
for leave to reply in support of their
motion for sanctions. The Commission
has denied the motion for sanctions and
the motion for leave.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Dec 06, 2010
Jkt 223001
Having examined the complaint
seeking a formal enforcement
proceeding, and having found that the
complaint complies with the
requirements for institution of a formal
enforcement proceeding contained in
Commission rule 210.75, 19 CFR 210.75,
the Commission has determined to
institute a formal enforcement
proceeding to determine whether the
respondents are in violation of the
Commission’s limited exclusion order
and cease-and-desist orders issued in
the investigation, and what, if any,
enforcement measures are appropriate.
The following entities are named as
parties to the formal enforcement
proceeding: (1) Complainant Broadcom,
(2) respondents SiRF, MiTAC, MiTAC
Digital, Mio, Pharos, and CSR; and (3)
a Commission investigative attorney to
be designated by the Director, Office of
Unfair Import Investigations.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in
section 210.75 of the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
210.75).
DATES:
By order of the Commission.
Issued: December 1, 2010.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
76025
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–376 and 563–
564 (Third Review)]
Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings
From Japan, Korea, and Taiwan
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Termination of five-year
reviews.
AGENCY:
The subject five-year reviews
were initiated in September 2010 to
determine whether revocation of the
antidumping duty orders on stainless
steel butt-weld pipe fittings from Japan,
Korea, and Taiwan would be likely to
lead to continuation or recurrence of
material injury. On November 5, 2010,
the Department of Commerce published
notice that it was revoking the orders
effective October 20, 2010, ‘‘{b}ecause
no interested domestic party responded
to the sunset review notice of initiation
by the applicable deadline * * *’’ (75
FR 68324). Accordingly, pursuant to
section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930
(19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), the subject reviews
are terminated.
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired individuals are advised that
information on this matter can be
obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server https://
www.usitc.gov.
Authority: These reviews are being
terminated under authority of title VII of the
Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to section 207.69 of the
Commission’s rules (19 CFR 207.69).
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
Issued: December 1, 2010.
[FR Doc. 2010–30611 Filed 12–6–10; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[FR Doc. 2010–30617 Filed 12–6–10; 8:45 am]
SUMMARY:
Effective Date: October 20, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree
Under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act
Pursuant to Department of Justice
policy, notice is hereby given that on
December 1, 2010 a proposed Consent
Decree with Brown County and the City
of Green Bay was lodged with the
United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Wisconsin in a case
captioned United States and the State of
Wisconsin v. NCR Corp., et al., Case No.
10–C–910 (E.D. Wis.). The Complaint in
that case alleges claims under the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act (‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. 9601–75,
against Brown County, the City of Green
Bay, and twelve other defendants
concerning polychlorinated biphenyl
contamination at the Lower Fox River
and Green Bay Superfund Site in
northeastern Wisconsin (the ‘‘Site’’).
If approved by the Court after a public
comment period, the proposed Consent
Decree would resolve Brown County’s
and the City of Green Bay’s potential
liability for response costs, response
actions, and natural resource damages
associated with the Site, on the terms
and conditions set forth in the Decree.
The proposed Consent Decree also
E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM
07DEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 234 (Tuesday, December 7, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 76025]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30611]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 731-TA-376 and 563-564 (Third Review)]
Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings From Japan, Korea, and
Taiwan
AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Termination of five-year reviews.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The subject five-year reviews were initiated in September 2010
to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty orders on
stainless steel butt-weld pipe fittings from Japan, Korea, and Taiwan
would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material
injury. On November 5, 2010, the Department of Commerce published
notice that it was revoking the orders effective October 20, 2010,
``{b{time} ecause no interested domestic party responded to the sunset
review notice of initiation by the applicable deadline * * *'' (75 FR
68324). Accordingly, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), the subject reviews are terminated.
DATES: Effective Date: October 20, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Messer (202-205-3193), Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired individuals are advised that
information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the
Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000.
General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server https://www.usitc.gov.
Authority: These reviews are being terminated under authority of
title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to section 207.69 of the Commission's rules (19 CFR
207.69).
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
Issued: December 1, 2010.
[FR Doc. 2010-30611 Filed 12-6-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
