Certain Tissue Paper Products From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Partial Rescission and Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of 2009-2010 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 73040-73041 [2010-29969]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
73040
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 228 / Monday, November 29, 2010 / Notices
meeting of the Renewable Energy and
Energy Efficiency Advisory Committee
(RE&EEAC) on December 7, 2010. The
document contained an incorrect e-mail
address and an incorrect mailing
address.
Comments received after that date will
be distributed to the members but may
not be considered at the meeting.
Edward A. O’Malley,
Director, Office of Energy and Environmental
Industries.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brian O’Hanlon, 202–482–3492.
[FR Doc. 2010–29882 Filed 11–26–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P
Correction
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Correction
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
In the Federal Register of November
17, 2010, in FR Doc. 75–70214 on page
70214 in the second column, correct the
e-mail listed under ‘‘FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT’’ header to read:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brian O’Hanlon, Office of Energy and
Environmental Industries, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department
of Commerce at (202) 482–3492; e-mail:
brian.ohanlon@trade.gov. This meeting
is physically accessible to people with
disabilities. Requests for sign language
interpretation or other auxiliary aids
should be directed to OEEI at (202) 482–
5225.
SUMMARY:
In the Federal Register of November
17, 2010, in FR Doc. 75–70214 on page
70214 in the third column, correct the
address ‘‘Public Participation’’ to read:
Public Participation: The meeting is
open to the public and the room is
disabled-accessible. Public seating is
limited and available on a first-come,
first-served basis. Members of the public
wishing to attend the meeting must
notify Brian O’Hanlon at the contact
information above by 5 p.m. EST on
Thursday, December 2, in order to preregister for clearance into the building.
Please specify any requests for
reasonable accommodation at least five
business days in advance of the
meeting. Last minute requests will be
accepted, but may be impossible to fill.
A limited amount of time, from 3 p.m.–
3:30 p.m., will be available for pertinent
brief oral comments from members of
the public attending the meeting.
Any member of the public may
submit pertinent written comments
concerning the RE&EEAC’s affairs at any
time before or after the meeting.
Comments may be submitted to the
Renewable Energy and Energy
Efficiency Advisory Committee, C/O:
Brian O’Hanlon, Office of Energy and
Environmental Technologies, U.S.
Department of Commerce, Mail Stop:
4053, 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230. To be
considered during the meeting, written
comments must be received no later
than 5 p.m. EST on Thursday, December
2, 2010, to ensure transmission to the
Committee prior to the meeting.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:57 Nov 26, 2010
Jkt 223001
International Trade Administration
[A–570–894]
Certain Tissue Paper Products From
the People’s Republic of China: Notice
of Partial Rescission and Extension of
Time Limit for Preliminary Results of
2009–2010 Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Department of
Commerce (the Department) is
rescinding in part the administrative
review of the antidumping duty order
on certain tissue paper products from
the People’s Republic of China (PRC) for
the period of review (POR) of March 1,
2009, to February 28, 2010, with respect
to Max Fortune Industrial Limited (Max
Fortune Industrial), Max Fortune (FZ)
Paper Products Co., Ltd. (formerly
known as Max Fortune (FETDE) Paper
Products Co., Ltd.) (Max Fortune
Fuzhou), and Fujian Provincial Shaowu
City Huaguang Special Craft Co., Ltd.
(Huaguang Special Craft). This partial
rescission is based on the timely
withdrawal of the requests for review by
the only interested parties that
requested the review of these
companies. The Department is also fully
extending the time limit for completion
of the preliminary results of this
administrative review with respect to
Max Fortune (Vietnam) Paper Products
Company Limited (Max Fortune
Vietnam) to no later than March 31,
2011.
DATES:
Effective Date: November 29,
2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brian Smith or Gemal Brangman, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 2, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone (202) 482–1766 or (202) 482–
3773, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Background
On March 1, 2010, the Department
published a notice of opportunity to
request an administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain
tissue paper products from the PRC. See
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty
Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation; Opportunity to Request
Administrative Review, 75 FR 9162
(March 1, 2010). In response, on March
31, 2010, the petitioner 1 timely
requested an administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on certain
tissue paper products from the PRC for
entries of the subject merchandise
during the POR, from Max Fortune
Industrial, Max Fortune Fuzhou, and
Max Fortune Vietnam (i.e., exporters of
the subject merchandise). Similarly, in a
letter dated March 31, 2010, Huaguang
Special Craft (i.e., an exporter of the
subject merchandise) submitted a timely
request for an administrative review of
its entries of the subject merchandise
during the POR. Therefore, on April 19,
2010, the Department initiated a review
of Max Fortune Industrial, Max Fortune
Fuzhou, Max Fortune Vietnam, and
Huaguang Special Craft. See Initiation of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews and Request for
Revocation in Part, 75 FR 22107 (April
27, 2010).
In a letter dated July 6, 2010,
Huaguang Special Craft informed the
Department that it had withdrawn from
this review and would no longer be
participating in this segment of the
proceeding. In a letter dated July 26,
2010, the petitioner withdrew its
request for review of Max Fortune
Industrial and Max Fortune Fuzhou,
and requested that the Department
rescind the review with respect to these
companies. No other parties requested a
review of Max Fortune Industrial, Max
Fortune Fuzhou, or Huaguang Special
Craft. The request for review of Max
Fortune Vietnam was not withdrawn,
and therefore, this administrative
review will continue with respect to
that company to examine its claim that
it did not use PRC jumbo rolls or sheets
of tissue paper in its shipments of tissue
paper to the United States during the
period of review. Max Fortune Vietnam
is also a respondent in an ongoing
anticircumvention inquiry and the
Department intends to conduct
verification of the above-mentioned
claim in the context of that segment (see
discussion below).
On March 29, 2010, the Department
also initiated a circumvention inquiry
on certain imports of tissue paper from
1 The petitioner is Seaman Paper Company of
Massachusetts, Inc.
E:\FR\FM\29NON1.SGM
29NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 228 / Monday, November 29, 2010 / Notices
Vietnam. See Certain Tissue Paper
Products from the People’s Republic of
China: Initiation of Anti-circumvention
Inquiry, 75 FR 17127 (April 5, 2010)
(Initiation). In the Initiation notice, the
Department stated that it would focus
its analysis on the significance of the
production process in Vietnam by Max
Fortune Vietnam, the company the
petitioner identified in its
circumvention request (which is the
same company on which the
Department initiated an administrative
review). In its June 28, 2010, response
to the Department’s April 23, 2010,
questionnaire in the anticircumvention
inquiry, Max Fortune Vietnam claimed
that it did not export tissue paper to the
United States produced from jumbo
rolls imported from the PRC since
January 2008. Likewise, in its August
17, 2010, response to the Department’s
May 7, 2010, questionnaire, in this
review, Max Fortune Vietnam claimed
that it did not export subject
merchandise from the PRC or Vietnam.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Rescission, in Part, of Administrative
Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the
Secretary will rescind an administrative
review, in whole or in part, if the party
who requested the review withdraws
the request within 90 days of the date
of publication of the notice of initiation
of the requested review. Accordingly,
the petitioner timely withdrew its
request for review of Max Fortune
Industrial and Max Fortune Fuzhou. In
addition, Huaguang Special Craft
withdrew its own request for review
within the 90-day period. Because no
other party requested a review of these
companies’ entries, we are rescinding
this administrative review with respect
to these companies in accordance with
19 CFR 351.213(d)(1).
Extension of Time Limits for
Preliminary Results
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires
the Department to issue the preliminary
results of an administrative review
within 245 days after the last day of the
anniversary month of the date of
publication of an order for which a
review is requested. If it is not
practicable to complete the review
within this time period, section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the
Department to extend this deadline to a
maximum of 365 days.
As noted above, Max Fortune Vietnam
claimed that it made no shipments from
Vietnam of tissue paper made from PRCorigin jumbo rolls or sheets to the U.S.
market during the POR. Data on the
record does indicate, however, that Max
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:57 Nov 26, 2010
Jkt 223001
Fortune Vietnam has exported tissue
paper from Vietnam to the U.S. market
during the period overlapping the
administrative review POR. In response
to the Department’s questionnaire in the
anticircumvention inquiry, Max Fortune
Vietnam claimed that it has not
exported to the United States tissue
paper produced from jumbo rolls
imported from the PRC since January
2008. Depending on the Department’s
finding in the anticircumvention
segment, Max Fortune Vietnam may or
may not continue to be a respondent in
the administrative review. Because the
Department intends to conduct
verification of Max Fortune Vietnam’s
claims in the circumvention segment,
the results of that verification will
directly impact the administrative
review segment of this proceeding. The
Department, therefore, requires
additional time in this review to make
a preliminary finding on Max Fortune
Vietnam’s ‘‘no shipment’’ claim. For this
reason, it is not practicable to complete
this review within the original time
limit. Thus, the Department is fully
extending the time limit for completion
of the preliminary results by 120 days
to 365 days, in accordance with section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. The preliminary
results are now due no later than March
31, 2011. The final results continue to
be due 120 days after publication of the
preliminary results.
73041
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective orders (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials or conversion to
judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and the terms of an APO is
a sanctionable violation.
This notice is published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(3)(A)
and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.213(d)(4) and 351.213(h)(2).
Dated: November 19, 2010.
Susan H. Kuhbach,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2010–29969 Filed 11–26–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Assessment
International Trade Administration
For the companies for which the
Department is rescinding this review,
the Department will instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to
assess antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries. Therefore, for Max
Fortune Industrial, Max Fortune
Fuzhou, and Huaguang Special Craft,
antidumping duties shall be assessed, if
applicable, at rates equal to the cash
deposit of estimated antidumping duties
required at the time of entry, or
withdrawal from warehouse, for
consumption, in accordance with 19
CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department
intends to issue appropriate assessment
instructions directly to CBP 15 days
after publication of this notice.
[A–570–967]
This notice serves as a reminder to
importers of their responsibility under
19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Secretary’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: November 29,
2010.
AGENCY:
Paul
Stolz or Lori Apodaca, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4474
and (202) 482–4551, respectively.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Postponement of Final Determination
Notification to Importers
PO 00000
Aluminum Extrusions From the
People’s Republic of China:
Postponement of Final Determination
of Sales at Less Than Fair Value
The Department of Commerce
(‘‘Department’’) initiated the
antidumping duty investigation of
aluminum extrusions from the People’s
Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) on April 27,
2010.1 On November 12, 2010, the
Department published the Preliminary
1 See Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s
Republic of China: Initiation of Antidumping Duty
Investigation, 75 FR 22109 (‘‘Initiation Notice’’).
E:\FR\FM\29NON1.SGM
29NON1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 228 (Monday, November 29, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73040-73041]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29969]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-894]
Certain Tissue Paper Products From the People's Republic of
China: Notice of Partial Rescission and Extension of Time Limit for
Preliminary Results of 2009-2010 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (the Department) is rescinding
in part the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on
certain tissue paper products from the People's Republic of China (PRC)
for the period of review (POR) of March 1, 2009, to February 28, 2010,
with respect to Max Fortune Industrial Limited (Max Fortune
Industrial), Max Fortune (FZ) Paper Products Co., Ltd. (formerly known
as Max Fortune (FETDE) Paper Products Co., Ltd.) (Max Fortune Fuzhou),
and Fujian Provincial Shaowu City Huaguang Special Craft Co., Ltd.
(Huaguang Special Craft). This partial rescission is based on the
timely withdrawal of the requests for review by the only interested
parties that requested the review of these companies. The Department is
also fully extending the time limit for completion of the preliminary
results of this administrative review with respect to Max Fortune
(Vietnam) Paper Products Company Limited (Max Fortune Vietnam) to no
later than March 31, 2011.
DATES: Effective Date:
November 29, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Smith or Gemal Brangman, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 2, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-
1766 or (202) 482-3773, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On March 1, 2010, the Department published a notice of opportunity
to request an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on
certain tissue paper products from the PRC. See Antidumping or
Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation;
Opportunity to Request Administrative Review, 75 FR 9162 (March 1,
2010). In response, on March 31, 2010, the petitioner \1\ timely
requested an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on
certain tissue paper products from the PRC for entries of the subject
merchandise during the POR, from Max Fortune Industrial, Max Fortune
Fuzhou, and Max Fortune Vietnam (i.e., exporters of the subject
merchandise). Similarly, in a letter dated March 31, 2010, Huaguang
Special Craft (i.e., an exporter of the subject merchandise) submitted
a timely request for an administrative review of its entries of the
subject merchandise during the POR. Therefore, on April 19, 2010, the
Department initiated a review of Max Fortune Industrial, Max Fortune
Fuzhou, Max Fortune Vietnam, and Huaguang Special Craft. See Initiation
of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and
Request for Revocation in Part, 75 FR 22107 (April 27, 2010).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The petitioner is Seaman Paper Company of Massachusetts,
Inc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In a letter dated July 6, 2010, Huaguang Special Craft informed the
Department that it had withdrawn from this review and would no longer
be participating in this segment of the proceeding. In a letter dated
July 26, 2010, the petitioner withdrew its request for review of Max
Fortune Industrial and Max Fortune Fuzhou, and requested that the
Department rescind the review with respect to these companies. No other
parties requested a review of Max Fortune Industrial, Max Fortune
Fuzhou, or Huaguang Special Craft. The request for review of Max
Fortune Vietnam was not withdrawn, and therefore, this administrative
review will continue with respect to that company to examine its claim
that it did not use PRC jumbo rolls or sheets of tissue paper in its
shipments of tissue paper to the United States during the period of
review. Max Fortune Vietnam is also a respondent in an ongoing
anticircumvention inquiry and the Department intends to conduct
verification of the above-mentioned claim in the context of that
segment (see discussion below).
On March 29, 2010, the Department also initiated a circumvention
inquiry on certain imports of tissue paper from
[[Page 73041]]
Vietnam. See Certain Tissue Paper Products from the People's Republic
of China: Initiation of Anti-circumvention Inquiry, 75 FR 17127 (April
5, 2010) (Initiation). In the Initiation notice, the Department stated
that it would focus its analysis on the significance of the production
process in Vietnam by Max Fortune Vietnam, the company the petitioner
identified in its circumvention request (which is the same company on
which the Department initiated an administrative review). In its June
28, 2010, response to the Department's April 23, 2010, questionnaire in
the anticircumvention inquiry, Max Fortune Vietnam claimed that it did
not export tissue paper to the United States produced from jumbo rolls
imported from the PRC since January 2008. Likewise, in its August 17,
2010, response to the Department's May 7, 2010, questionnaire, in this
review, Max Fortune Vietnam claimed that it did not export subject
merchandise from the PRC or Vietnam.
Rescission, in Part, of Administrative Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the Secretary will rescind an
administrative review, in whole or in part, if the party who requested
the review withdraws the request within 90 days of the date of
publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review.
Accordingly, the petitioner timely withdrew its request for review of
Max Fortune Industrial and Max Fortune Fuzhou. In addition, Huaguang
Special Craft withdrew its own request for review within the 90-day
period. Because no other party requested a review of these companies'
entries, we are rescinding this administrative review with respect to
these companies in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1).
Extension of Time Limits for Preliminary Results
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Act), requires the Department to issue the preliminary results of an
administrative review within 245 days after the last day of the
anniversary month of the date of publication of an order for which a
review is requested. If it is not practicable to complete the review
within this time period, section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the
Department to extend this deadline to a maximum of 365 days.
As noted above, Max Fortune Vietnam claimed that it made no
shipments from Vietnam of tissue paper made from PRC-origin jumbo rolls
or sheets to the U.S. market during the POR. Data on the record does
indicate, however, that Max Fortune Vietnam has exported tissue paper
from Vietnam to the U.S. market during the period overlapping the
administrative review POR. In response to the Department's
questionnaire in the anticircumvention inquiry, Max Fortune Vietnam
claimed that it has not exported to the United States tissue paper
produced from jumbo rolls imported from the PRC since January 2008.
Depending on the Department's finding in the anticircumvention segment,
Max Fortune Vietnam may or may not continue to be a respondent in the
administrative review. Because the Department intends to conduct
verification of Max Fortune Vietnam's claims in the circumvention
segment, the results of that verification will directly impact the
administrative review segment of this proceeding. The Department,
therefore, requires additional time in this review to make a
preliminary finding on Max Fortune Vietnam's ``no shipment'' claim. For
this reason, it is not practicable to complete this review within the
original time limit. Thus, the Department is fully extending the time
limit for completion of the preliminary results by 120 days to 365
days, in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. The
preliminary results are now due no later than March 31, 2011. The final
results continue to be due 120 days after publication of the
preliminary results.
Assessment
For the companies for which the Department is rescinding this
review, the Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries.
Therefore, for Max Fortune Industrial, Max Fortune Fuzhou, and Huaguang
Special Craft, antidumping duties shall be assessed, if applicable, at
rates equal to the cash deposit of estimated antidumping duties
required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for
consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department
intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions directly to CBP 15
days after publication of this notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective orders (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order
is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the
terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
This notice is published in accordance with sections 751(a)(3)(A)
and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4) and 351.213(h)(2).
Dated: November 19, 2010.
Susan H. Kuhbach,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2010-29969 Filed 11-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
