In the Matter of: Certain Data Storage Products and Components Thereof; Notice of Investigation, 71736 [2010-29554]
Download as PDF
71736
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 24, 2010 / Notices
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
Issued: November 18, 2010.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010–29552 Filed 11–23–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337–TA–748]
In the Matter of: Certain Data Storage
Products and Components Thereof;
Notice of Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Institution of investigation
pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on
October 20, 2010, under section 337 of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Data Network
Storage, LLC of Newport Beach,
California. A supplement to the
complaint was filed on November 10,
2010. The complaint as supplemented
alleges violations of section 337 based
upon the importation into the United
States, the sale for importation, and the
sale within the United States after
importation of certain data storage
products and components thereof by
reason of infringement of certain claims
of U.S. Patent No. 6,098,128 (‘‘the ‘128
patent’’). The complaint further alleges
that an industry in the United States
exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of
section 337.
The complainant requests that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue an
exclusion order and cease and desist
orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, is available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:30 Nov 23, 2010
Jkt 223001
202–205–2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on 202–205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its internet server at https://
www.usitc.gov. The public record for
this investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeffrey T. Hsu, Esq., Office of Unfair
Import Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, telephone (202)
205–2571.
Authority: The authority for
institution of this investigation is
contained in section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, and in section
210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10
(2010).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
November 17, 2010, ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain data storage
products and components thereof that
infringe one or more of claims 1–8 of the
‘128 patent, and whether an industry in
the United States exists as required by
subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
(2) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainant is: Data Network
Storage, LLC, 500 Newport Center Drive,
7th Floor, Newport Beach, CA 92660.
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
NetApp, Inc., 495 East Java Drive,
Sunnyvale, CA 94089.
Dell, Inc., One Dell Way, Round Rock,
TX 78682.
Xyratex, Ltd., 46831 Lakeview Blvd.,
Fremont, CA 94538.
Xyratex International Inc., 855 Riverside
Parkway, Suite 40, West Sacramento,
CA 95605.
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
Xyratex (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd, No. C–7–
2 (Level 2) Bay Avenue, Lorong Bayan
Indah 3, 1900 Penang, Malaysia.
Dot Hill Systems Corp., 1351 S. Sunset
Street, Longmont, CO 80501.
International Business Machines
Corporation, One New Orchard Road,
Armonk, NY 10504.
Cisco Systems, Inc., 170 West Tasman
Drive, San Jose, CA 95134.
QNAP Systems, Inc., 166 University
Parkway, Pomona, CA 91768.
(c) The Commission investigative
attorney, party to this investigation, is
Jeffrey T. Hsu, Esq., Office of Unfair
Import Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(3) For the investigation so instituted,
the Honorable Paul J. Luckern, Chief
Administrative Law Judge, U.S.
International Trade Commission, shall
designate the presiding Administrative
Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(d)–(e) and 210.13(a),
such responses will be considered by
the Commission if received not later
than 20 days after the date of service by
the Commission of the complaint and
the notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
Issued: November 18, 2010.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010–29554 Filed 11–23–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
E:\FR\FM\24NON1.SGM
24NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 226 (Wednesday, November 24, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 71736]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29554]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337-TA-748]
In the Matter of: Certain Data Storage Products and Components
Thereof; Notice of Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the
U.S. International Trade Commission on October 20, 2010, under section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of
Data Network Storage, LLC of Newport Beach, California. A supplement to
the complaint was filed on November 10, 2010. The complaint as
supplemented alleges violations of section 337 based upon the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the
sale within the United States after importation of certain data storage
products and components thereof by reason of infringement of certain
claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,098,128 (``the `128 patent''). The
complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists
as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337.
The complainant requests that the Commission institute an
investigation and, after the investigation, issue an exclusion order
and cease and desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained
by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining
access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at
202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be
obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey T. Hsu, Esq., Office of Unfair
Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone
(202) 205-2571.
Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is
contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and in
section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19
CFR 210.10 (2010).
Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on November 17, 2010, ordered that--
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the
sale within the United States after importation of certain data storage
products and components thereof that infringe one or more of claims 1-8
of the `128 patent, and whether an industry in the United States exists
as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
(2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of
investigation shall be served:
(a) The complainant is: Data Network Storage, LLC, 500 Newport
Center Drive, 7th Floor, Newport Beach, CA 92660.
(b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint
is to be served:
NetApp, Inc., 495 East Java Drive, Sunnyvale, CA 94089.
Dell, Inc., One Dell Way, Round Rock, TX 78682.
Xyratex, Ltd., 46831 Lakeview Blvd., Fremont, CA 94538.
Xyratex International Inc., 855 Riverside Parkway, Suite 40, West
Sacramento, CA 95605.
Xyratex (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd, No. C-7-2 (Level 2) Bay Avenue, Lorong
Bayan Indah 3, 1900 Penang, Malaysia.
Dot Hill Systems Corp., 1351 S. Sunset Street, Longmont, CO 80501.
International Business Machines Corporation, One New Orchard Road,
Armonk, NY 10504.
Cisco Systems, Inc., 170 West Tasman Drive, San Jose, CA 95134.
QNAP Systems, Inc., 166 University Parkway, Pomona, CA 91768.
(c) The Commission investigative attorney, party to this
investigation, is Jeffrey T. Hsu, Esq., Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(3) For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Paul J.
Luckern, Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade
Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d)-(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent,
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.
Issued: November 18, 2010.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-29554 Filed 11-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P