Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change Relating to Certain Membership Rules, 71155-71158 [2010-29343]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 224 / Monday, November 22, 2010 / Notices
and fails to account for the special
status of TMI–2, the current level of
underfunding, or the fact that
decommissioning rate recovery for
Metropolitan Edison and Pennsylvania
Electric cease per Pennsylvania Public
Utility Commission Orders on December
31, 2010.
The request is being treated pursuant
to 10 CFR 2.206 of the Commission’s
regulations. The request has been
referred to the Director of the Office of
Federal and State Materials and
Environmental Management Programs
(FSME). As provided by 10 CFR 2.206,
appropriate action will be taken on this
petition within a reasonable time. The
petitioner met with FSME’s Petition
Review Board (PRB), via teleconference,
on October 19, 2010, to discuss the
petition. The results of that discussion
have been considered in the PRB’s
determination regarding the petitioner’s
request for additional information from
FirstEnergy and in establishing the
schedule for the review of the petition.
Copies of the petition are available to
the public from the NRC’s Agencywide
Documents Access and Management
System (ADAMS) in the public
Electronic Reading Room on the NRC
Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/readingrm/adams.html under ADAMS
Accession No. ML102770308, and are
available for inspection at the
Commission’s Public Document Room,
located at One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville,
Maryland.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, November 9,
2010.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Charles L. Miller,
Director, Office of Federal and State Materials
and Environmental Management Programs.
[FR Doc. 2010–29367 Filed 11–19–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
POSTAL SERVICE
Market Test of Experimental Product:
‘‘Alternative Postage Payment Method
for Greeting Cards’’
Postal ServiceTM.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Postal Service gives
notice of a market test of an
experimental product in accordance
with statutory requirements.
DATES: November 22, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David H. Rubin, 202–268–2986.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
United States Postal Service® hereby
gives notice pursuant to 39 U.S.C.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:49 Nov 19, 2010
Jkt 223001
3641(c)(1) that it will begin a market test
of its ‘‘Alternative Postage Payment
Method for Greeting Cards’’
experimental product on January 2,
2011. The Postal Service has filed with
the Postal Regulatory Commission a
notice setting out the basis for the Postal
Service’s determination that the market
test is covered by 39 U.S.C. 3641 and
describing the nature and scope of the
market test. Documents are available at
https://www.prc.gov, Docket No.
MT2011–1.
Neva R. Watson,
Attorney, Legislative.
[FR Doc. 2010–29288 Filed 11–19–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–12–P
71155
The Office of the Secretary at (202)
551–5400.
Dated: November 18, 2010.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010–29475 Filed 11–18–10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–63318; File No. SR–Phlx–
2010–148]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of
Filing of Proposed Rule Change
Relating to Certain Membership Rules
November 16, 2010.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Sunshine Act Meeting
Notice is hereby given, pursuant to
the provisions of the Government in the
Sunshine Act, Public Law 94–409, that
the Securities and Exchange
Commission will hold a Closed Meeting
on Tuesday, November 23, 2010 at
2 p.m.
Commissioners, Counsel to the
Commissioners, the Secretary to the
Commission, and recording secretaries
will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain
staff members who have an interest in
the matters also may be present.
The General Counsel of the
Commission, or his designee, has
certified that, in his opinion, one or
more of the exemptions set forth in 5
U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10)
and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii)
and (10), permit consideration of the
scheduled matters at the Closed
Meeting.
Commissioner Paredes, as duty
officer, voted to consider the items
listed for the Closed Meeting in a closed
session, and determined that no earlier
notice thereof was possible.
The subject matter of the Closed
Meeting scheduled for Tuesday,
November 23, 2010 will be:
Institution and settlement of injunctive
actions;
Institution and settlement of
administrative proceedings; and
Other matters relating to enforcement
proceedings.
At times, changes in Commission
priorities require alterations in the
scheduling of meeting items.
For further information and to
ascertain what, if any, matters have been
added, deleted or postponed, please
contact:
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 2 thereunder,
notice is hereby given that on November
5, 2010, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC
(‘‘Phlx’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed
rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange, pursuant to Section
19(b)(1) of the Act 3 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,4 proposes to delete
Exchange Rule 793, Affiliations—Dual
and [sic] Multiple and amend Rule 908,
Rights and Privileges of A–1 Permits,
and Option Floor Procedure Advices
(‘‘OFPAs’’) F–9, Dual Affiliations, and F–
11, Splitting Order [sic], and Regulation
3, Identification Badges/Access Cards to
provide that a Series A–1 permit holder
may affiliate with two member
organizations under common
ownership.
The Exchange is also proposing to
make a clarifying amendment to Rule
908(h) regarding permit transfer.
Finally, the Exchange desires to amend
Exchange Rule 900.2 to add a provision
for lapsed applications.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s Web site
at https://www.nasdaqtrader.com/
micro.aspx?id=PHLXRulefilings, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
2 17
E:\FR\FM\22NON1.SGM
22NON1
71156
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 224 / Monday, November 22, 2010 / Notices
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
1. Purpose
The purpose of the proposed rule
change is to eliminate and reserve
Exchange Rule 793 titled Affiliations—
Dual or Multiple and adopt a simple
standard for multiple affiliations.
Currently, Exchange Rule 793 provides
that no person shall at the same time be
a partner, officer, director, stockholder,
or associated person of more than one
member or participant organization, nor
shall he be affiliated in any manner with
a non-member or non-participant
organization which is engaged in the
securities business, unless such
affiliation has been disclosed to and
approved in writing by the member and/
or participant organization and such
approval has been filed with the Office
of the Secretary.
Currently, a permit holder may
affiliate with more than one member or
participant organization so long as the
Exchange is notified, in writing, of the
affiliation. The affiliation involves an
agreement between the member
organizations and the permit holder.
The Exchange is not a party to that
arrangement. The Exchange requires: (i)
An explanation of the business purpose
for the arrangement; and (ii)
identification of the individuals who
shall supervise the business conduct of
the permit holder that is multiply
affiliated for compliance with the ByLaws and Rules. The Exchange may
disapprove multiple affiliations which
are inconsistent with Exchange
standards of financial responsibility,
operational capability, or compliance
responsibility.
Currently, an affiliation pursuant to
Rule 793 allows a person to be
associated with multiple member
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:49 Nov 19, 2010
Jkt 223001
organizations for different purposes.
Specifically, if a broker dealer sought
membership on the Exchange for the
purpose of electronic access to the
Exchange’s trading system, that broker
dealer could seek an affiliation pursuant
to Rule 793. In this example, the
affiliation would serve to provide
membership status to a broker dealer
without the need for the broker dealer
to secure a permit. If a member
organization is solely gaining electronic
access to the Exchange, that member
organization only requires one permit to
qualify as a member organization.
Another purpose for the dual
affiliation could involve access to the
Exchange’s trading floor and the ability
for permit holders to affiliate with
multiple member organizations for
greater flexibility. In this example floor
traders could become affiliated with
various related member organizations in
order to satisfy certain trading and/or
staffing requirements. If a member
organization is conducting business on
the Exchange’s trading floor, each
person associated with that member
organization on the trading floor who
functions in a trading capacity is
required to have a permit. Every trader
on the Exchange’s trading floor is
required to obtain a Series A–1 permit.
The Exchange is proposing to
eliminate this Rule 5 and instead amend
Exchange Rule 908 to allow a Series A–
1 permit holder on the Exchange’s
trading floor to affiliate with up to two
member organizations (a primary and a
secondary member organization) that
are under common ownership, a
primary and a secondary member
organization.6 The common ownership
would be at least 75% common
ownership between the member
organizations. Both the primary and
secondary member organizations would
be required to notify the Membership
Department of such an affiliation.
Notification of such affiliation pursuant
to 908(b)(i) would include: (i) An
attestation of common ownership; (ii)
the names of the individuals responsible
for supervision of the permit holder;
and (iii) the Exchange account numbers
for billing purposes.7 A Series A–1
permit holder would also be required to
comply with all current membership
5 The Commission notes the Exchange is
proposing to reserve Rule 793.
6 Notwithstanding applicable By-Laws and Rules
conditioning membership, a Series A–1 permit
holder on the Exchange’s trading floor may be
affiliated with up to two (2) member organizations
that are under common ownership.
7 Both the primary and secondary member
organizations would be required to execute a form
which the Membership Department shall make
available once the Membership Department is
notified of the proposed affiliation.
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
By-Laws and Rules. Specifically, ByLaws 13–2, 13–4 and 13–6, among
others, would still condition
membership.
While a Series A–1 permit holder who
is already affiliated with a member
organization (primary affiliation) may
affiliate with a member organization
under common ownership (a secondary
affiliation) as proposed herein, the
permit holder must comply with all
applicable registration, qualification and
examination requirements. The
proposed amendment to Rule 908(b)(i)
allows the Series A–1 permit holder the
ability to engage in trading activity on
behalf of either the primary or
secondary member organization that the
permit holder is affiliated with as per
Rule 908(b)(i). The Exchange’s By-Laws
and Rules would continue to apply to
affiliated permit holders (permit holders
with a primary and a secondary
affiliation) and the affiliated member
organizations (primary and secondary
affiliations) with respect to trading,
registration, qualifications,
examinations and other membership
requirements. Further, the Exchange
would have access to information on the
affiliate in order to allow it to carry out
its regulatory responsibility with respect
to the member organization and its
affiliated persons.
For example, an affiliated Series A–1
permit holder (a permit holder with a
primary and a secondary affiliation) is
required to display a badge on the
Exchange’s trading floor identifying on
behalf of which member organization
the permit holder is trading for on a
particular day. For example whether the
Series A–1 permit holder is trading for
the primary or secondary member
organization.8 The badge is used to
identify the member organization with
which the Series A–1 permit holder is
affiliated. The Series A–1 permit holder
is required to maintain all the requisite
qualifications, registrations and comply
with all applicable trading rules at all
times. The Series A–1 permit holder is
required to specifically obtain and
maintain all necessary registrations to
trade for an affiliated member
organization, as well as the necessary
qualifications.
In particular, the Exchange requires
certain information from the Series A–
1 permit holder seeking affiliation in
order to assure compliance with Rule
908 and other membership requirements
8 The Exchange requires a Series A–1 permit
holder on the Exchange’s trading floor to wear a
badge which is provided by the Exchange and
contains identifying information. The affiliated
Series A–1 permit holder cannot simultaneously
trade for both the primary and secondary member
organization on the same day.
E:\FR\FM\22NON1.SGM
22NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 224 / Monday, November 22, 2010 / Notices
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
as well as other Rules. Specifically, the
affiliated permit holder (permit holder
with a primary and a secondary
affiliation) would be required to
disclose the individuals at each member
organization (primary and secondary)
responsible for supervising the Series
A–1 permit holder.9 This information is
utilized by the Regulatory staff in its
examination of persons trading on the
Exchange for appropriate compliance
with the Rules of the Exchange.
If a Series A–1 permit holder who is
currently affiliated pursuant to Rule 793
is not affiliated with entities under
common ownership, the organization
that they qualify as a member would be
required to obtain its own permit in
order to maintain its membership status.
A Series A–1 permit holder who
currently affiliates with an unrelated
party (not under common ownership) to
qualify a member organization for
electronic access or access to the trading
floor would not be permitted to
continue to qualify that member
organization under this proposal.
Similarly, if a permit holder had more
than two affiliations with a member
organization they would only be
permitted to maintain an affiliation with
up to two member organizations. The
amended text of Rule 908 requires that
a Series A–1 permit holder can only
affiliate with up to two member
organizations that are under common
ownership.
In addition, the Exchange proposes to
make conforming amendments to
certain OFPAs 10 and Regulations,11
specifically, OFPA F–9, Dual
Affiliations, OFPA F–11, Splitting Order
[sic], and Regulation 3, Identification
Badges/Access Cards.
The Exchange proposes to amend
OFPA F–9 by removing references to
‘‘dual’’ so that the filing [sic] simply
refers to affiliations. The Exchange is
changing the requirement to report to
the Office of the Secretary to the
Membership Department to conform
with the proposed amendment to Rule
908. The Exchange proposes to amend
the reference to Rule 793, which is
being deleted, and instead refer to Rule
908.
9 The Commission notes that the Exchange has
proposed that both member organizations, not the
affiliated permit holder, will be responsible for
notifying the Exchange of the identity of the
individuals supervising the affiliated permit holder.
See proposed Rule 908(b)(i).
10 The Exchange’s minor rule plan consists of
options floor procedure advices (‘‘OFPAs’’ or
‘‘Advices’’) with preset fines, pursuant to Rule 19d–
1(c) under the Act. 17 CFR 240.19d–1(c). Most
OFPAs have corresponding options rules.
11 Regulation 3 is part of the Exchange’s Order
and Decorum Regulations administered pursuant to
Exchange Rule 60.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:49 Nov 19, 2010
Jkt 223001
The Exchange is also proposing to
amend the language in OFPA F–9 to
remove the requirements to explain
compensation since the only affiliations
that will be acceptable are those under
common ownership. The Exchange is
deleting the requirement to file an
explanation of all agreed upon forms of
compensation between affiliated firms
because the Exchange believes that the
information is not necessary since the
firms would be required to be under
common ownership pursuant to this
proposal. The Exchange is also adding
a sentence indicating that floor members
must adhere to the requirements in
renamed (a) and (b). The Exchange is
proposing to reference Exchange Rule
1020 for the newly named F–9(ii)(a).
The Exchange added this reference to
Rule 1020 in paragraph F–9(ii)(a) in
order to cross-reference the Rule
concerning information barriers. This is
not a substantive amendment; the
purpose of this amendment is to be
more specific with respect to the
information in that paragraph. The
Exchange simply renamed (b) for ease of
reference.
The Exchange is proposing to amend
OFPA F–11 by similarly removing
references to ‘‘dual’’ and replacing
references to Rule 793 with Rule 908.
The Exchange is proposing to amend
Regulation 3 by removing the reference
to the word ‘‘dual.’’
The Exchange also proposes to amend
Exchange Rule 908(h) to add an ‘‘or’’ to
the text of the Exchange Rule 908(h) to
make clear that a permit may be
transferred either intra-firm or to an
inactive nominee registered with the
Exchange. This proposal is solely to
clarify an existing practice.
The Exchange proposes to amend
Exchange Rule 900.2, Membership and
Foreign Currency Options Applications,
to address lapsed applications. Pursuant
to Exchange Rule 900.2, applicants
desiring membership in the Exchange
are required to submit information in a
form prescribed by the Membership
Department.12 The Exchange expends
resources in processing applications for
members. The determination to admit a
person for membership in the Exchange
is contingent on the information
provided in the application. After a 90
day calendar period has elapsed, the
information provided by the applicant is
stale and no longer a reasonable basis
for the Exchange to make a
12 The Membership Department posts the
requisite forms on the Exchange’s Web site at
https://www.nasdaqomxtrader.com/
Trader.aspx?id=membership_phlx. The
Membership Department updates the forms from
time to time and makes them available on this Web
site.
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
71157
determination on admitting a person for
membership. The Membership
Department expends a considerable
amount of resources requesting updates
from members and researching
information to make a reasonable
determination when an application is
outdated.
This proposal seeks to amend
Exchange Rule 900.2 13 to require
persons seeking membership to the
Exchange to provide all information and
subsequent requests from the
Membership Department for
information within a 90 calendar day
period or the application lapses. The
Exchange may extend the timeframe for
extraordinary purposes or in the
instance that the Exchange makes a
request relatively close to the 90-day
timeframe. If an application lapses, the
person would be required to submit a
new application.14 The Exchange
intends that all applicants be provided
an equal opportunity to seek
membership to the Exchange.
Additionally, the Exchange would not
refund the fee associated with
submitting an application and the
applicant would be required to pay a
new fee to resubmit the application.15
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)
of the Act 16 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act 17
in particular, in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general to protect
investors and the public interest, by
continuing to allow a Series A–1 permit
holder to affiliate a permit in certain
circumstances.
Exchange Rule 793 was initially
proposed 18 prior to demutualization
when the Exchange had a seat market
and at that time it was more costly to
obtain the right to trade on the
13 The Commission notes that the Exchange
proposes to renumber Rule 900.2(e) as 900.2(f) due
to the new proposed Rule 900.2(e).
14 The purpose of the new application would be
to update all information to provide the
Membership Department current information on
which to basis [sic] a decision to accept the
applicant for membership. The Exchange intends to
file a proposal with the Commission to amend its
Fee Schedule to reflect the lapsed application fee.
15 The Exchange’s Application Fee can be found
on the Fee Schedule located on the Exchange’s Web
site at https://www.nasdaqomxtrader.com/content/
marketregulation/membership/phlx/feesched.pdf.
16 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
17 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
18 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 21777
(January 9, 1985) [sic], 50 FR 8030, February 21,
1985) [sic] (SR–Phlx–84–14).
E:\FR\FM\22NON1.SGM
22NON1
71158
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 224 / Monday, November 22, 2010 / Notices
Exchange.19 Since demutualization, a
Series A–1 permit has expanded a
member’s ability to gain access to the
Exchange at a significantly lower cost.20
Today, there are no restrictions on the
number of permits the Exchange may
issue and, assuming the qualifications
are met, a member organization may
hold any number of permits, which does
not prevent access to the Exchange.
The Exchange believes that this
proposal simplifies the affiliation
process and applies it equally to all
members. The Exchange believes that
allowing for affiliation where there is a
common ownership and up to two
affiliations is a simple, straightforward
process for allowing access to the
Exchange for the purpose of allowing
floor traders to meet Exchange rules and
for assistance with staffing issues.
The Exchange believes that amending
the language in Rule 908(h) will provide
members with clarity as to permit
transfers. Finally, requiring applicants
to submit their information within a 90
calendar day period, absent a showing
of good cause, provides the Membership
Department with information that can
be utilized to make reasonable decisions
concerning membership at the
Exchange.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such longer period
up to 90 days (i) as the Commission may
designate if it finds such longer period
to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which
the self-regulatory organization
consents, the Commission will:
19 Prior to demutualization, the Exchange had a
limited number of seats and the dual affiliation
allowed for additional access. There is no fixed
number of Series A–1 permits today.
20 The Exchange also allows members on the
Exchange’s trading floor to appoint inactive
nominees pursuant to By-Law Article XII, Section
12–10. The inactive nominee allows a Member to
have additional flexibility in obtaining coverage on
the trading floor.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:49 Nov 19, 2010
Jkt 223001
(A) By order approve or disapprove
the proposed rule change, or
(B) institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.21
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
[FR Doc. 2010–29343 Filed 11–19–10; 8:45 am]
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
No. SR–Phlx–2010–148 on the subject
line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File No.
SR–Phlx–2010–148. This file number
should be included on the subject line
if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing
also will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. All comments received will
be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File No. SR–Phlx–2010–
148 and should be submitted on or
before December 13, 2010.
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–63317; File No. SR–
NYSEArca–2010–101]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Proposed
Rule Change Relating to the Listing
and Trading of the ProShares VIX
Short-Term Futures ETF and the
ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF
November 16, 2010.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’
or ‘‘Exchange Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that,
on November 5, 2010, NYSE Arca, Inc.
(‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘NYSE Arca’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have
been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to list and
trade shares of the ProShares VIX ShortTerm Futures ETF and the ProShares
VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF under NYSE
Arca Equities Rule 8.200, Commentary
.02. The text of the proposed rule
change is available at the Exchange, the
Commission’s Public Reference Room,
and https://www.nyse.com.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
21 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
E:\FR\FM\22NON1.SGM
22NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 224 (Monday, November 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71155-71158]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29343]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-63318; File No. SR-Phlx-2010-148]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of
Filing of Proposed Rule Change Relating to Certain Membership Rules
November 16, 2010.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 \2\ thereunder, notice is hereby given
that on November 5, 2010, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC (``Phlx'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange.
The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange, pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Act \3\ and Rule
19b-4 thereunder,\4\ proposes to delete Exchange Rule 793,
Affiliations--Dual and [sic] Multiple and amend Rule 908, Rights and
Privileges of A-1 Permits, and Option Floor Procedure Advices
(``OFPAs'') F-9, Dual Affiliations, and F-11, Splitting Order [sic],
and Regulation 3, Identification Badges/Access Cards to provide that a
Series A-1 permit holder may affiliate with two member organizations
under common ownership.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange is also proposing to make a clarifying amendment to
Rule 908(h) regarding permit transfer. Finally, the Exchange desires to
amend Exchange Rule 900.2 to add a provision for lapsed applications.
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
Web site at https://www.nasdaqtrader.com/micro.aspx?id=PHLXRulefilings,
at the principal office of the Exchange, and at
[[Page 71156]]
the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of the proposed rule change is to eliminate and reserve
Exchange Rule 793 titled Affiliations--Dual or Multiple and adopt a
simple standard for multiple affiliations. Currently, Exchange Rule 793
provides that no person shall at the same time be a partner, officer,
director, stockholder, or associated person of more than one member or
participant organization, nor shall he be affiliated in any manner with
a non-member or non-participant organization which is engaged in the
securities business, unless such affiliation has been disclosed to and
approved in writing by the member and/or participant organization and
such approval has been filed with the Office of the Secretary.
Currently, a permit holder may affiliate with more than one member
or participant organization so long as the Exchange is notified, in
writing, of the affiliation. The affiliation involves an agreement
between the member organizations and the permit holder. The Exchange is
not a party to that arrangement. The Exchange requires: (i) An
explanation of the business purpose for the arrangement; and (ii)
identification of the individuals who shall supervise the business
conduct of the permit holder that is multiply affiliated for compliance
with the By-Laws and Rules. The Exchange may disapprove multiple
affiliations which are inconsistent with Exchange standards of
financial responsibility, operational capability, or compliance
responsibility.
Currently, an affiliation pursuant to Rule 793 allows a person to
be associated with multiple member organizations for different
purposes. Specifically, if a broker dealer sought membership on the
Exchange for the purpose of electronic access to the Exchange's trading
system, that broker dealer could seek an affiliation pursuant to Rule
793. In this example, the affiliation would serve to provide membership
status to a broker dealer without the need for the broker dealer to
secure a permit. If a member organization is solely gaining electronic
access to the Exchange, that member organization only requires one
permit to qualify as a member organization.
Another purpose for the dual affiliation could involve access to
the Exchange's trading floor and the ability for permit holders to
affiliate with multiple member organizations for greater flexibility.
In this example floor traders could become affiliated with various
related member organizations in order to satisfy certain trading and/or
staffing requirements. If a member organization is conducting business
on the Exchange's trading floor, each person associated with that
member organization on the trading floor who functions in a trading
capacity is required to have a permit. Every trader on the Exchange's
trading floor is required to obtain a Series A-1 permit.
The Exchange is proposing to eliminate this Rule \5\ and instead
amend Exchange Rule 908 to allow a Series A-1 permit holder on the
Exchange's trading floor to affiliate with up to two member
organizations (a primary and a secondary member organization) that are
under common ownership, a primary and a secondary member
organization.\6\ The common ownership would be at least 75% common
ownership between the member organizations. Both the primary and
secondary member organizations would be required to notify the
Membership Department of such an affiliation. Notification of such
affiliation pursuant to 908(b)(i) would include: (i) An attestation of
common ownership; (ii) the names of the individuals responsible for
supervision of the permit holder; and (iii) the Exchange account
numbers for billing purposes.\7\ A Series A-1 permit holder would also
be required to comply with all current membership By-Laws and Rules.
Specifically, By-Laws 13-2, 13-4 and 13-6, among others, would still
condition membership.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The Commission notes the Exchange is proposing to reserve
Rule 793.
\6\ Notwithstanding applicable By-Laws and Rules conditioning
membership, a Series A-1 permit holder on the Exchange's trading
floor may be affiliated with up to two (2) member organizations that
are under common ownership.
\7\ Both the primary and secondary member organizations would be
required to execute a form which the Membership Department shall
make available once the Membership Department is notified of the
proposed affiliation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
While a Series A-1 permit holder who is already affiliated with a
member organization (primary affiliation) may affiliate with a member
organization under common ownership (a secondary affiliation) as
proposed herein, the permit holder must comply with all applicable
registration, qualification and examination requirements. The proposed
amendment to Rule 908(b)(i) allows the Series A-1 permit holder the
ability to engage in trading activity on behalf of either the primary
or secondary member organization that the permit holder is affiliated
with as per Rule 908(b)(i). The Exchange's By-Laws and Rules would
continue to apply to affiliated permit holders (permit holders with a
primary and a secondary affiliation) and the affiliated member
organizations (primary and secondary affiliations) with respect to
trading, registration, qualifications, examinations and other
membership requirements. Further, the Exchange would have access to
information on the affiliate in order to allow it to carry out its
regulatory responsibility with respect to the member organization and
its affiliated persons.
For example, an affiliated Series A-1 permit holder (a permit
holder with a primary and a secondary affiliation) is required to
display a badge on the Exchange's trading floor identifying on behalf
of which member organization the permit holder is trading for on a
particular day. For example whether the Series A-1 permit holder is
trading for the primary or secondary member organization.\8\ The badge
is used to identify the member organization with which the Series A-1
permit holder is affiliated. The Series A-1 permit holder is required
to maintain all the requisite qualifications, registrations and comply
with all applicable trading rules at all times. The Series A-1 permit
holder is required to specifically obtain and maintain all necessary
registrations to trade for an affiliated member organization, as well
as the necessary qualifications.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ The Exchange requires a Series A-1 permit holder on the
Exchange's trading floor to wear a badge which is provided by the
Exchange and contains identifying information. The affiliated Series
A-1 permit holder cannot simultaneously trade for both the primary
and secondary member organization on the same day.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In particular, the Exchange requires certain information from the
Series A-1 permit holder seeking affiliation in order to assure
compliance with Rule 908 and other membership requirements
[[Page 71157]]
as well as other Rules. Specifically, the affiliated permit holder
(permit holder with a primary and a secondary affiliation) would be
required to disclose the individuals at each member organization
(primary and secondary) responsible for supervising the Series A-1
permit holder.\9\ This information is utilized by the Regulatory staff
in its examination of persons trading on the Exchange for appropriate
compliance with the Rules of the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ The Commission notes that the Exchange has proposed that
both member organizations, not the affiliated permit holder, will be
responsible for notifying the Exchange of the identity of the
individuals supervising the affiliated permit holder. See proposed
Rule 908(b)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
If a Series A-1 permit holder who is currently affiliated pursuant
to Rule 793 is not affiliated with entities under common ownership, the
organization that they qualify as a member would be required to obtain
its own permit in order to maintain its membership status. A Series A-1
permit holder who currently affiliates with an unrelated party (not
under common ownership) to qualify a member organization for electronic
access or access to the trading floor would not be permitted to
continue to qualify that member organization under this proposal.
Similarly, if a permit holder had more than two affiliations with a
member organization they would only be permitted to maintain an
affiliation with up to two member organizations. The amended text of
Rule 908 requires that a Series A-1 permit holder can only affiliate
with up to two member organizations that are under common ownership.
In addition, the Exchange proposes to make conforming amendments to
certain OFPAs \10\ and Regulations,\11\ specifically, OFPA F-9, Dual
Affiliations, OFPA F-11, Splitting Order [sic], and Regulation 3,
Identification Badges/Access Cards.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ The Exchange's minor rule plan consists of options floor
procedure advices (``OFPAs'' or ``Advices'') with preset fines,
pursuant to Rule 19d-1(c) under the Act. 17 CFR 240.19d-1(c). Most
OFPAs have corresponding options rules.
\11\ Regulation 3 is part of the Exchange's Order and Decorum
Regulations administered pursuant to Exchange Rule 60.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes to amend OFPA F-9 by removing references to
``dual'' so that the filing [sic] simply refers to affiliations. The
Exchange is changing the requirement to report to the Office of the
Secretary to the Membership Department to conform with the proposed
amendment to Rule 908. The Exchange proposes to amend the reference to
Rule 793, which is being deleted, and instead refer to Rule 908.
The Exchange is also proposing to amend the language in OFPA F-9 to
remove the requirements to explain compensation since the only
affiliations that will be acceptable are those under common ownership.
The Exchange is deleting the requirement to file an explanation of all
agreed upon forms of compensation between affiliated firms because the
Exchange believes that the information is not necessary since the firms
would be required to be under common ownership pursuant to this
proposal. The Exchange is also adding a sentence indicating that floor
members must adhere to the requirements in renamed (a) and (b). The
Exchange is proposing to reference Exchange Rule 1020 for the newly
named F-9(ii)(a). The Exchange added this reference to Rule 1020 in
paragraph F-9(ii)(a) in order to cross-reference the Rule concerning
information barriers. This is not a substantive amendment; the purpose
of this amendment is to be more specific with respect to the
information in that paragraph. The Exchange simply renamed (b) for ease
of reference.
The Exchange is proposing to amend OFPA F-11 by similarly removing
references to ``dual'' and replacing references to Rule 793 with Rule
908. The Exchange is proposing to amend Regulation 3 by removing the
reference to the word ``dual.''
The Exchange also proposes to amend Exchange Rule 908(h) to add an
``or'' to the text of the Exchange Rule 908(h) to make clear that a
permit may be transferred either intra-firm or to an inactive nominee
registered with the Exchange. This proposal is solely to clarify an
existing practice.
The Exchange proposes to amend Exchange Rule 900.2, Membership and
Foreign Currency Options Applications, to address lapsed applications.
Pursuant to Exchange Rule 900.2, applicants desiring membership in the
Exchange are required to submit information in a form prescribed by the
Membership Department.\12\ The Exchange expends resources in processing
applications for members. The determination to admit a person for
membership in the Exchange is contingent on the information provided in
the application. After a 90 day calendar period has elapsed, the
information provided by the applicant is stale and no longer a
reasonable basis for the Exchange to make a determination on admitting
a person for membership. The Membership Department expends a
considerable amount of resources requesting updates from members and
researching information to make a reasonable determination when an
application is outdated.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ The Membership Department posts the requisite forms on the
Exchange's Web site at https://www.nasdaqomxtrader.com/Trader.aspx?id=membership_phlx. The Membership Department updates
the forms from time to time and makes them available on this Web
site.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This proposal seeks to amend Exchange Rule 900.2 \13\ to require
persons seeking membership to the Exchange to provide all information
and subsequent requests from the Membership Department for information
within a 90 calendar day period or the application lapses. The Exchange
may extend the timeframe for extraordinary purposes or in the instance
that the Exchange makes a request relatively close to the 90-day
timeframe. If an application lapses, the person would be required to
submit a new application.\14\ The Exchange intends that all applicants
be provided an equal opportunity to seek membership to the Exchange.
Additionally, the Exchange would not refund the fee associated with
submitting an application and the applicant would be required to pay a
new fee to resubmit the application.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ The Commission notes that the Exchange proposes to renumber
Rule 900.2(e) as 900.2(f) due to the new proposed Rule 900.2(e).
\14\ The purpose of the new application would be to update all
information to provide the Membership Department current information
on which to basis [sic] a decision to accept the applicant for
membership. The Exchange intends to file a proposal with the
Commission to amend its Fee Schedule to reflect the lapsed
application fee.
\15\ The Exchange's Application Fee can be found on the Fee
Schedule located on the Exchange's Web site at https://www.nasdaqomxtrader.com/content/marketregulation/membership/phlx/feesched.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act \16\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act \17\ in particular, in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments
to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system, and, in general to protect investors and the public
interest, by continuing to allow a Series A-1 permit holder to
affiliate a permit in certain circumstances.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\17\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exchange Rule 793 was initially proposed \18\ prior to
demutualization when the Exchange had a seat market and at that time it
was more costly to obtain the right to trade on the
[[Page 71158]]
Exchange.\19\ Since demutualization, a Series A-1 permit has expanded a
member's ability to gain access to the Exchange at a significantly
lower cost.\20\ Today, there are no restrictions on the number of
permits the Exchange may issue and, assuming the qualifications are
met, a member organization may hold any number of permits, which does
not prevent access to the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 21777 (January 9,
1985) [sic], 50 FR 8030, February 21, 1985) [sic] (SR-Phlx-84-14).
\19\ Prior to demutualization, the Exchange had a limited number
of seats and the dual affiliation allowed for additional access.
There is no fixed number of Series A-1 permits today.
\20\ The Exchange also allows members on the Exchange's trading
floor to appoint inactive nominees pursuant to By-Law Article XII,
Section 12-10. The inactive nominee allows a Member to have
additional flexibility in obtaining coverage on the trading floor.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that this proposal simplifies the affiliation
process and applies it equally to all members. The Exchange believes
that allowing for affiliation where there is a common ownership and up
to two affiliations is a simple, straightforward process for allowing
access to the Exchange for the purpose of allowing floor traders to
meet Exchange rules and for assistance with staffing issues.
The Exchange believes that amending the language in Rule 908(h)
will provide members with clarity as to permit transfers. Finally,
requiring applicants to submit their information within a 90 calendar
day period, absent a showing of good cause, provides the Membership
Department with information that can be utilized to make reasonable
decisions concerning membership at the Exchange.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period up to 90 days (i) as the
Commission may designate if it finds such longer period to be
appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
(A) By order approve or disapprove the proposed rule change, or
(B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File No. SR-Phlx-2010-148 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File No. SR-Phlx-2010-148. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File No. SR-Phlx-2010-148 and should be
submitted on or before December 13, 2010.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-29343 Filed 11-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P