Annual Funding Notice for Defined Benefit Plans, 70625-70653 [2010-28890]

Agencies

• Employee Benefits Security Administration
• DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 222 (Thursday, November 18, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 70625-70653]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28890]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employee Benefits Security Administration

29 CFR Part 2520

RIN 1210-AB18


Annual Funding Notice for Defined Benefit Plans

AGENCY: Employee Benefits Security Administration, Labor.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains a proposed regulation that, on 
adoption, would implement the annual funding notice requirement in the 
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), as amended by 
the Pension Protection Act of 2006 (PPA) and the Worker, Retiree, and 
Employer Recovery Act of 2008 (WRERA). As amended, section 101(f) of 
ERISA generally requires the administrators of all defined benefit 
plans, not just multiemployer defined benefit plans, to furnish an 
annual funding notice to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 
(PBGC), participants, beneficiaries, and certain other persons. A 
funding notice must include, among other information, the plan's 
funding target attainment percentage or funded percentage, as 
applicable, over a period of time, as well as other information 
relevant to the plan's funded status. This document also contains 
proposed conforming amendments to other regulations under ERISA, such 
as the summary annual report regulation, which became

[[Page 70626]]

necessary when the PPA amended section 101(f) of ERISA. The proposed 
regulation would affect plan administrators and participants and 
beneficiaries of defined benefit pension plans, as well as labor 
organizations representing participants and beneficiaries and 
contributing employers of multiemployer plans.

DATES: Written comments on the proposed regulation should be received 
by the Department of Labor on or before January 18, 2011.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by RIN 1210-AB18, by one 
of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     E-mail: e-ORI@dol.gov. Include RIN 1210-AB18 in the 
subject line of the message.
     Mail: Office of Regulations and Interpretations, Employee 
Benefits Security Administration, Room N-5655, U.S. Department of 
Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210, Attention: 
Annual Funding Notice for Defined Benefit Plans.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name 
and Regulation Identifier Number (RIN) for this rulemaking. Comments 
received will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov 
and https://www.dol.gov/ebsa, and made available for public inspection 
at the Public Disclosure Room, N-1513, Employee Benefits Security 
Administration, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210, 
including any personal information provided. Do not include any 
personally identifiable information (such as name, address, or other 
contact information) or confidential business information that you do 
not want publicly disclosed. Comments posted on the Internet can be 
retrieved by most Internet search engines. Comments may be submitted 
anonymously. Persons submitting comments electronically are encouraged 
not to submit paper copies.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas M. Hindmarch or Stephanie L. 
Ward, Office of Regulations and Interpretations, Employee Benefits 
Security Administration, (202) 693-8500. This is not a toll-free 
number.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A. Background

    In 2004, the Pension Funding Equity Act (PFEA '04), Public Law 108-
218, amended title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 
1974 (ERISA) by adding section 101(f), which required multiemployer 
defined benefit plans to furnish a plan funding notice annually to each 
participant and beneficiary, to each labor organization representing 
such participants or beneficiaries, to each employer that has an 
obligation to contribute under the plan, and to the Pension Benefit 
Guaranty Corporation (PBGC).\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ On January 11, 2006, the Department of Labor published a 
final regulation implementing the requirements of section 101(f) of 
ERISA as amended by PFEA '04. See 29 CFR 2520.101-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In 2006, section 501(a) of the Pension Protection Act of 2006, 
Public Law 109-280 (PPA), significantly amended section 101(f) of 
ERISA. For example, section 101(f) of ERISA now requires administrators 
of all defined benefit plans that are subject to title IV of ERISA, not 
only multiemployer plans, to furnish annual funding notices. In 
addition, the PPA shortened the time frame for providing funding 
notices and enhanced the notice content requirements. These changes are 
discussed in detail below. Pursuant to section 501(d) of the PPA, the 
amendments to section 101(f) apply to plan years beginning after 
December 31, 2007.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Prior to the applicability date of the PPA amendments to 
section 101(f) of ERISA, a multiemployer plan was required to 
furnish a funding notice consistent with Sec.  2520.101-4 (for plan 
years beginning prior to January 1, 2008). For plan years beginning 
after December 31, 2007, multiemployer plans must comply with 
section 101(f) as amended, and when final, the regulations under 
Sec.  2520.101-5, rather than Sec.  2520.101-4. The Department will 
remove Sec.  2520.101-4 from the Code of Federal Regulations in 
conjunction with the promulgation of a final rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On February 10, 2009, the Department issued Field Assistance 
Bulletin 2009-01 (FAB 2009-01) as interim guidance under section 101(f) 
of ERISA in order to assist plan administrators in discharging their 
obligations under the new annual funding notice requirements. FAB 2009-
01 provides question and answer guidance on a number of issues under 
section 101(f) of ERISA. It also includes model funding notices. Much 
of the guidance in FAB 2009-01 has been incorporated into the proposed 
regulation contained in this document. That guidance remains in effect 
until the Department adopts final regulations under section 101(f) of 
ERISA (or if the Department were to publish any other guidance under 
section 101(f) other than final regulations).\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ FAB 2009-01 is available on the Department's Web site at 
https://www.dol.gov/ebsa/regs/fab2009-1.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Overview of Proposed 29 CFR 2520.101-5--Annual Funding Notice for 
Defined Benefit Pension Plans

1. Scope

    Paragraph (a) of the proposed regulation implements the 
requirements set forth in section 101(f) of ERISA. This section in 
general requires the administrator of a defined benefit plan to which 
title IV of ERISA applies to furnish annually a funding notice to the 
PBGC, to each plan participant and beneficiary, to each labor 
organization representing such participants or beneficiaries, and, in 
the case of a multiemployer plan, to each employer that has an 
obligation to contribute to the plan. Those persons entitled to the 
funding notice are further clarified in paragraph (f) of the proposed 
regulation.
    Paragraphs (a)(2) and (3) of the proposed regulation provide 
limited exceptions to the requirement to furnish a funding notice.
    Under the exception in paragraph (a)(2)(i) of the proposal, the 
plan administrator of an insolvent multiemployer plan that is in 
compliance with the insolvency notice requirements of sections 4245(e) 
or 4281(d)(3) of ERISA before the due date of the funding notice for a 
plan year is not, for such year, required to furnish the funding notice 
to the parties otherwise entitled to such notice. This exception is 
effectively the same as the exception that currently exists in Sec.  
2520.101-4(a)(2) for multiemployer plans receiving financial assistance 
from the PBGC. The rationale for the exception was articulated in the 
final regulation under Sec.  2520.101-4.\4\ The exception in the 
proposal is phrased slightly differently than the exception in Sec.  
2520.101-4 at the request of the PBGC. Inasmuch as this exception is 
predicated on sufficient alternative notification under sections 
4245(e) and 4281(d)(3), the exception would cease to be available with 
respect to a plan that emerges from insolvency or ceases to comply with 
the insolvency notice requirements under title IV of ERISA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The annual funding notice would be of little, if any, value 
to recipients in light of the PBGC's authority and responsibility 
under title IV of ERISA with respect to insolvent multiemployer 
plans. See 71 FR 1904, n.1 (Jan. 11, 2006). See also 70 FR 6306, n.1 
(Feb. 4, 2005).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Under the exception in paragraph (a)(2)(ii) of the proposal, the 
plan administrator of a single-employer plan is not required to furnish 
a funding notice for a plan year if the due date for such notice is on 
or after the date the PBGC is appointed trustee of the plan pursuant to 
section 4042 of ERISA, or the plan has distributed assets in

[[Page 70627]]

satisfaction of all benefit liabilities in a standard termination 
pursuant to section 4041(b) or in a distress termination pursuant to 
section 4041(c)(3)(B)(i), or of all guaranteed benefits in a distress 
termination pursuant to section 4041(c)(3)(B)(ii) of ERISA. The 
Department believes, because of the separate disclosure requirements 
applicable to such plans under title IV of ERISA, a funding notice may 
be unnecessary or confusing to participants where the PBGC is appointed 
trustee of a terminated single-employer plan or where a terminated 
single-employer plan has already satisfied all benefit liabilities or 
all guaranteed benefits.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ For example, under a standard termination, participants are 
provided a notice of intent to terminate 60 to 90 days prior to the 
proposed termination date (29 CFR 4041.23), a notice of plan 
benefits by the time PBGC Form 500 is filed with the PBGC (29 CFR 
4041.24), and a notice of annuity information in the notice of 
intent to terminate or, in certain cases, 45 days prior to the 
distribution date (29 CFR 4041.23(b)(5) and 29 CFR 4041.27).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Under the exception in paragraph (a)(3) of the proposal, relief is 
provided in the case of a merger or consolidation of two or more plans. 
In such circumstances, the plan administrator of the plan that has 
legally transferred control of its assets to a successor plan 
(hereafter the ``non-successor plan'') shall not be required to furnish 
a funding notice for its final plan year that ends coincident with or 
immediately prior to the merger. Thus, for example, if plan A were to 
merge with plan B in 2010 and plan B is the successor plan (i.e., the 
plan to which control of the assets of plan A was legally transferred), 
then the plan administrator of plan A is not required to furnish a 
funding notice for plan A for its final plan year that ends upon the 
occurrence of the merger in 2010. However, the funding notice of plan B 
(i.e., the plan to which control of the assets of plan A was legally 
transferred) must satisfy the general content requirements in paragraph 
(b) of the proposed regulation and, in addition, contain a general 
explanation of the merger. The general explanation must include the 
effective date of, and identify each plan involved with, the merger or 
consolidation. Given that participants and beneficiaries will look to 
the successor plan for their pension benefits following the merger or 
consolidation, rather than the plan whose assets and liabilities were 
transferred to the successor plan, the Department believes that 
participants and beneficiaries would realize little, if any, benefit 
from receiving a funding notice from the non-successor plan. In 
addition, including an explanation of the merger in the funding notice 
of the successor plan should abate any participant confusion that might 
exist by virtue of not receiving a funding notice from the non-
successor plan.

2. Content Requirements

a. Identifying Information (Proposed Sec.  2520.105-1(b)(1))
    Paragraph (b)(1) of the proposed regulation provides that a funding 
notice must include the name of the plan and the name, address and 
telephone number of the plan administrator (and the name, address and 
phone number of the plan's principal administrative officer if the 
principal administrative officer is different from the plan 
administrator). A funding notice also must include each plan sponsor's 
name and employer identification number and the plan number. For 
purposes of this requirement, employer identification numbers, name of 
plan sponsor, and plan numbers are the same as those used in the annual 
report filed in accordance with section 104(a) of ERISA.
b. Funding Percentage (Proposed Sec.  2520.105-1(b)(2))
    Paragraph (b)(2) of the proposed regulation requires disclosure of 
a plan's funding percentage. Specifically, in the case of a single-
employer plan, paragraph (b)(2)(i) of the proposal provides that a 
notice must include a statement as to whether the plan's funding target 
attainment percentage for the plan year to which the notice relates 
(the ``notice year''), and for each of the two preceding plan years, is 
at least 100 percent (and, if not, the actual percentages). The term 
``funding target attainment percentage'' is defined in section 
303(d)(2) of ERISA, which corresponds to Internal Revenue Code (Code) 
section 430(d)(2). Guidance issued by the Department of the Treasury 
under Code section 430 also applies for purposes of section 303 of 
ERISA. Treasury regulations under Code section 430 provide that the 
funding target attainment percentage of a plan for a plan year is a 
fraction (expressed as a percentage), the numerator of which is the 
value of plan assets for the plan year (determined under the rules of 
26 CFR 1.430(g)-1) after subtraction of the prefunding balance and the 
funding standard carryover balance under section 430(f)(4)(B) of the 
Code and Sec.  1.430(f)-1(c) and the denominator of which is the 
funding target of the plan for the plan year (determined without regard 
to the at-risk rules of section 430(i) of the Code and Sec.  1.430(i)-
1).\6\ Thus, this percentage for a plan year is calculated by dividing 
the value of the plan's assets for that year (after subtracting the 
prefunding and funding standard carryover balances, if any) by the 
funding target of the plan for that year (disregarding the at-risk 
rules).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See 26 CFR 1.430(d)-1(b)(3)(i); 74 FR 53004, 53036 (Oct. 15, 
2009).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Similarly, in the case of a multiemployer plan, paragraph 
(b)(2)(ii) of the proposed regulation provides that a notice must 
include a statement as to whether the plan's funded percentage for the 
notice year, and for each of the two preceding plan years, is at least 
100 percent (and, if not, the actual percentages). The term ``funded 
percentage'' is defined in section 305(i) of ERISA, which corresponds 
to section 432(i) of the Code. Guidance issued by the Department of the 
Treasury under section 432 of the Code also applies for purposes of 
section 305 of ERISA. Proposed Treasury regulations under Code section 
432 provide that the funded percentage of a plan for a plan year is a 
fraction (expressed as a percentage), the numerator of which is the 
actuarial value of the plan's assets as determined under section 
431(c)(2) of the Code and the denominator of which is the accrued 
liability of the plan, determined using the actuarial assumptions 
described in section 431(c)(3) of the Code and the unit credit funding 
method.\7\ Thus, this percentage for a plan year is calculated by 
dividing the plan's assets for that year by the accrued liability of 
the plan for that year, determined using the unit credit funding 
method.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See proposed Treasury regulation 26 CFR 1.432(a)-1(b)(7); 73 
FR 14417, 14423 (March 18, 2008).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

c. Assets and Liabilities (Proposed Sec.  2520.101-5(b)(3))
(i) Single-Employer Plans--Assets and Liabilities as of the Valuation 
Date
    In the case of a single-employer plan, paragraph (b)(3)(i)(A) of 
the proposed regulation requires that a funding notice include a 
statement of the total assets (separately stating the prefunding 
balance and the funding standard carryover balance) and liabilities of 
the plan for the notice year and each of the two preceding plan years. 
Like the statute, under section 101(f)(2)(B)(ii)(I)(aa), the proposed 
regulation provides that assets and liabilities are to be determined 
``in the same manner as under section 303'' of ERISA. The Department 
interprets this reference to mean the assets and liabilities used to 
determine a plan's

[[Page 70628]]

funding target attainment percentage (as well as the plan's ``at-risk'' 
liabilities pursuant to section 303(i) of ERISA, taking into account 
section 303(i)(5), if the plan is in ``at-risk'' status). This approach 
makes transparent the assets and liabilities used to determine the 
funding target attainment percentage of the plan, as well as the plan's 
liabilities (i.e., funding target) actually used for funding purposes.
(ii) Single-Employer Plans--Assets and Liabilities as of the Last Day 
of the Plan Year
    Section 101(f)(2)(B)(ii)(I)(bb) of ERISA states that a funding 
notice must include, in the case of a single-employer plan, ``the value 
of the plan's assets and liabilities for the plan year to which the 
notice relates as of the last day of the plan year to which the notice 
relates determined using the asset valuation under subclause (II) of 
section 4006(a)(3)(E)(iii) and the interest rate under section 
4006(a)(3)(E)(iv)[.]''
    Based on the foregoing, paragraph (b)(3)(i)(B) of the proposed 
regulation provides that a single-employer plan must include a 
statement of the value of the plan's assets and liabilities determined 
as of the last day of the notice year. For purposes of this statement, 
plan administrators must report the fair market value of assets as of 
the last day of the plan year. In addition, a plan's liabilities as of 
the last day of the plan year are equal to the present value, as of the 
last day of the plan year, of benefits accrued as of that same date. 
With the exception of the interest rate assumption, the present value 
should be determined using the assumptions used to determine the 
funding target under section 303. The interest rate assumption is the 
segment interest rate provided under section 4006(a)(3)(E)(iv) of ERISA 
in effect for the last month of the notice year rather than the rate in 
effect for the month preceding the first month of the notice year.
    The Department recognizes that in their funding notices some plans 
may need to estimate their year-end liability for the notice year. In 
this regard, the statute does not specifically set forth any standards 
to govern such estimations. Therefore, pending further guidance, plan 
administrators may, in a reasonable manner, project liabilities to 
year-end using standard actuarial techniques. The Department, however, 
specifically invites comment on this issue.
(iii) Multiemployer Plans--Assets and Liabilities as of the Valuation 
Date
    In the case of a multiemployer plan, paragraph (b)(3)(ii)(A) of the 
proposed regulation requires a statement of the value of the plan's 
assets (determined in the same manner as under section 304(c)(2) of 
ERISA) and liabilities (determined in the same manner as under section 
305(i)(8) of ERISA, using reasonable actuarial assumptions as required 
under section 304(c)(3) of ERISA) for the notice year and each of the 
two plan years preceding the notice year. The assets and liabilities 
are to be measured as of the valuation date in each of these three 
years. These are the same assets and liabilities used to determine the 
plan's funded percentage required to be disclosed under paragraph 
(b)(2)(ii) of the proposed regulation. Thus, the recipients of a 
funding notice will receive not only their plans' funded percentage, 
pursuant to paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of the proposal, but, pursuant to 
paragraph (b)(3)(ii)(A), they also will receive the numbers behind that 
percentage. Under section 305(i)(8) of ERISA, liabilities are 
determined using the unit credit funding method whether or not that 
actuarial method is used for the plan's actuarial valuation in general.
(iv) Multiemployer Plans--Assets as of the Last Day of the Plan Year
    In the case of a multiemployer plan, paragraph (b)(3)(ii)(B) of the 
proposed regulation requires a statement of the fair market value of 
plan assets as of the last day of the notice year, and as of the last 
day of each of the two preceding plan years as reported in the annual 
report filed under section 104(a) of ERISA for each such preceding plan 
year.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Joint Committee on Taxation Technical Explanation (JCX 
85-08, Dec. 11, 2008) of H.R. 7327, the ``Worker, Retiree, and 
Employer Recovery Act of 2008'' explaining that section 105 of this 
Act amended section 101(f)(2)(B)(ii)(II) of ERISA to conform the 
asset and liability information provided for a multiemployer plan to 
the information that must be provided for a single-employer plan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(v) Year-End Statement of Plan Assets
    As discussed above, all funding notices must contain a statement of 
the fair market value of plan assets as of the last day of the notice 
year. Plans may receive contributions for the notice year after the 
close of that year but before the funding notice is sent to recipients. 
In such circumstances, these contributions may be included in the fair 
market value of assets. Inclusion is permissive; the proposed 
regulation does not require these contributions to be included in the 
year-end asset statement. If they are included, however, they may be 
included only if they are attributable to the notice year for funding 
purposes.
    In the case of a single-employer plan, such contributions must be 
discounted back to the last day of the notice year using the effective 
interest rate. The effective interest rate is defined under section 
303(h)(2)(A) of ERISA (section 430(h)(2)(A) of the Code). This approach 
ensures consistency with section 303(g)(4) of ERISA (section 430(g)(4) 
of the Code) relating to prior year contributions.\9\ For example: Plan 
X is a calendar year plan. The plan's funding notice for 2011 was 
timely furnished in 2012. The year-end statement of assets was based on 
December 31, 2011, fair market value. The plan administrator included 
the present value of contributions made to the plan on February 14, 
2012, in the year-end statement of assets. The ``effective interest 
rate'' for the plan was five percent in 2011 and four percent in 2012. 
The contributions would be discounted from February 14, 2012, to 
December 31, 2011, using a discount rate of five percent per annum, 
which was the ``effective interest rate'' for 2011.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ This approach is consistent with the position taken by the 
PBGC regarding the treatment of subsequent contributions in 
determining the fair market value of assets under section 
4006(a)(3)(E)(iii). See page 18 of the PBGC's 2010 Comprehensive 
Premium Payment Instructions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In the case of a multiemployer plan, section 304(c)(8) of ERISA 
provides that contributions made by an employer for the plan year after 
the last day of the plan year, but not later than two and one-half 
months after such day (which may be extended for not more than six 
months under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury), 
shall be deemed made on the last day of the plan year. Section 
304(c)(8) of ERISA corresponds to section 431(c)(8) of the Code. 
Section 431(c)(8) of the Code is the post-PPA counterpart to former 
section 412(c)(10)(B) of the Code. Pursuant to the Treasury regulations 
under former section 412(c)(10)(B) of the Code (26 CFR 11.412(c)-12), 
contributions for a plan year that are made within eight and one-half 
months after the end of a plan year are deemed to have been made on the 
last day of that plan year. Therefore, consistent with section 
304(c)(8) of ERISA and the corresponding section 431(c)(8) of the Code, 
and Treasury regulations under the former section 412(c)(10)(B) of the 
Code, it is not necessary for a multiemployer plan to discount such 
contributions for interest when stating its year-end asset value in a 
funding notice.

[[Page 70629]]

d. Demographic Information (Proposed Sec.  2520.101-5(b)(4))
    Paragraph (b)(4) of the proposed regulation provides for disclosure 
of a plan's participant population based on the employment status of 
those participants. Specifically, it requires a statement of the number 
of participants who, as of the valuation date of the notice year, are: 
(i) Retired or separated from service and receiving benefits; (ii) 
retired or separated and entitled to future benefits (but currently not 
receiving benefits); or (iii) active participants under the plan. Plan 
administrators must state the number of participants in each of these 
categories and the sum of all such participants. For purposes of this 
statement, the terms ``active'' and ``retired or separated'' in 
relation to participants shall have the same meaning given to those 
terms in instructions to the latest annual report filed under section 
104(a) of the Act (currently, instructions relating to lines 5 and 6 of 
the 2009 Form 5500 Annual Return/Report).
    Neither section 101(f) of ERISA nor paragraph (b)(4) of the 
proposed regulation specifically address whether, or how, to account 
for deceased participants who have one or more beneficiaries who are 
receiving or are entitled to receive benefits under a plan. For 
purposes of the annual funding notice requirements, however, these 
participants would appear to be similar to retired or separated 
participants who are themselves receiving, or are entitled to receive, 
benefits under the plan in that the plan retains liability for benefits 
accrued by such deceased participants. Accordingly, the Department 
solicits comments on whether such individuals should be reflected in 
the participant count required under paragraph (b)(4) of the proposal 
and, if so, how. For example, such individuals could be included in the 
respective ``retired or separated'' categories under paragraph (b)(4) 
of the proposal or in a stand-alone category.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See, e.g., line 6(e) of the 2009 Form 5500 Annual Return/
Report (for listing the number of deceased participants whose 
beneficiaries are receiving or entitled to receive benefits).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The statute does not specify the date for counting the participants 
required by paragraph (b)(4) of the proposed regulation. The Department 
has chosen the valuation date of the notice year to provide consistency 
with the measurement date of the plan's funding target attainment 
percentage or funded percentage, as applicable. The Department solicits 
comments on whether a different date would be more appropriate, such as 
the last day of the notice year. Comments should explain why a 
different date would be more appropriate.
    As explained above, the demographic information required by 
paragraph (b)(4) of the proposal is limited to the notice year. The 
Department solicits comments on whether, and to what extent, notice 
recipients would benefit from demographic information covering a longer 
period of time, such as the notice year and two preceding plan years. 
Commentary is requested on whether such information, in conjunction 
with other information required by section 101(f) and the proposed 
regulation would assist notice recipients in fully understanding the 
financial health and condition of the plan.
e. Funding and Investment Policies; Asset Allocation (Proposed Sec.  
2520.101-5(b)(5))
    Section 101(f)(2)(B)(iv) of ERISA provides that a funding notice 
must include ``a statement setting forth the funding policy of the plan 
and the asset allocation of investments under the plan (expressed as 
percentages of total assets) as of the end of the plan year to which 
the notice relates[.]'' Paragraph (b)(5) of the proposal directly 
incorporates these requirements. See paragraphs (b)(5)(i) and (ii) of 
the proposal. Paragraph (b)(5) of the proposal adds the requirement 
that a notice also must set forth a general description of any 
investment policy of the plan as it relates to the funding policy and 
the asset allocation. See paragraph (b)(5)(iii) of the proposal. The 
purpose of this addition is to provide participants and beneficiaries 
with contextual information not explicitly required by section 101(f) 
of ERISA so that they may better understand and appreciate the plan's 
approach to funding benefits.\11\ Use of the word ``any'' in paragraph 
(b)(5)(ii) reflects that the maintenance of a written statement of 
investment policy is not specifically required under ERISA, although 
the Department expects that it would be rare for a plan subject to 
section 101(f) of ERISA not to have such a policy. The Department 
specifically requests comment on the costs and benefits associated with 
the disclosure of such additional information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ A requisite feature of every employee benefit plan is a 
procedure for establishing a funding policy to carry out plan 
objectives. See section 402(b)(1) of ERISA. The maintenance by an 
employee benefit plan of a statement of investment policy is 
consistent with the fiduciary obligations set forth in ERISA section 
404(a)(1)(A) and (B). A statement of investment policy is a written 
statement that provides the fiduciaries who are responsible for plan 
investments with guidelines or general instructions concerning 
various types or categories of investment management decisions. A 
statement of investment policy is distinguished from directions as 
to the purchase or sale of a specific investment at a specific time. 
See 29 CFR 2509.08-2(2) (formerly 29 CFR 2509.94-2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A plan administrator may satisfy the asset allocation requirement 
in paragraph (b)(5)(ii) of the proposal by using the table of asset 
classes set forth in the model notice published in the appendices to 
this proposal. The asset classes identified in the model are based on 
the asset classes listed in Part 1 of the Asset and Liability Statement 
of the latest Schedule H of the Form 5500 Annual Return/Report (see 
Lines 1a, 1c(1)-(15), 1d(1)-(2) and 1(e) of the 2009 Schedule H).\12\ 
With respect to each asset class, plan administrators should insert an 
appropriate percentage. For this purpose, a plan administrator should 
use the same valuation and accounting methods as for Form 5500 Schedule 
H reporting purposes. The master trust investment account (MTIA), 
common/collective trust (CCT), pooled separate account (PSA), and 103-
12 investment entity (103-12IE) investment categories have the same 
definitions as for the Form 5500 instructions. In addition, if a plan 
held at year-end an interest in one or more direct filing entities 
(DFEs), i.e., MTIAs, CCTs, PSAs, or 103-12IEs, the plan administrator 
should include in the model notice a statement apprising recipients how 
to obtain more information regarding the plan's DFE investments (e.g., 
a plan's Schedule D and R and/or the DFE's schedule H). For this 
purpose, the model notice provides a statement immediately following 
the asset allocation table for contact information, which a plan 
administrator should complete and include if the plan held an interest 
in one or more DFEs, in order to inform participants how to get 
additional investment information. The Department specifically requests 
comment on whether this approach (i.e., based on the Schedule H) to 
stating the asset allocation of a plan's investments as of the last day 
of the notice year provides sufficient information to participants 
regarding the plan's investments, or whether there is a more effective 
way of communicating this required information in the funding notice, 
and if so, how.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ The asset classes identified in the models do not include 
any receivables reportable on Schedule H of the Form 5500 (see lines 
1b(1)-(3) of the 2009 Schedule H).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

f. Endangered or Critical Status (Proposed Sec.  2520.101-5(b)(6))
    Paragraph (b)(6) of the proposed regulation, which is limited to 
multiemployer plans, requires that the

[[Page 70630]]

funding notice for such plans indicate whether the plan was in 
endangered or critical status for the notice year. For this purpose, 
``endangered or critical status'' is determined in accordance with 
section 305 of ERISA, which corresponds to section 432 of the Code. 
Pursuant to paragraph (b)(6)(i) of the proposal, if the plan was in 
endangered or critical status for the notice year, the funding notice 
must describe how a person may obtain a copy of the plan's funding 
improvement or rehabilitation plan, as appropriate, and the actuarial 
and financial data that demonstrate any action taken by the plan toward 
fiscal improvement. Pursuant to paragraph (b)(6)(ii) of the proposal, 
if the plan was in endangered or critical status for the notice year, 
the notice must contain a summary of the plan's funding improvement or 
rehabilitation plan. This summary is required to include, when 
applicable, a description of any updates or modifications to such 
funding improvement or rehabilitation plan adopted during the notice 
year. Paragraph (b)(6)(ii) clarifies that a summary is required not 
only for the notice year in which the funding improvement or 
rehabilitation plan was adopted, but for every plan year thereafter 
until the funding improvement or rehabilitation plan ceases to be in 
effect. This proposed clarification resolves any ambiguity in section 
101(f)(2)(B)(v)(II) regarding whether a summary is only required to be 
included for the notice year in which the funding improvement or 
rehabilitation plan is first adopted and then again if subsequently 
modified, as opposed to every plan year the funding improvement or 
rehabilitation plan is in effect.
g. Material Effect Events (Proposed Sec.  2520.101-5(b)(7))
    Paragraph (b)(7) of the proposed regulation directly incorporates 
the requirements of section 101(f)(2)(B)(vi) of ERISA. That section of 
ERISA requires an explanation of any plan amendment, scheduled benefit 
increase or reduction, or other known event taking effect in the 
current plan year and having a material effect on plan liabilities or 
assets for the year, as well as a projection to the end of such plan 
year of the effect of the amendment, scheduled increase or reduction, 
or event on plan liabilities. The Department believes there is 
ambiguity with respect to the term ``current plan year'' in section 
101(f)(2)(B)(vi) of ERISA. The question is whether this term refers to 
the notice year or the plan year following the notice year. The 
proposed regulation adopts the view that such term means the plan year 
following the notice year (i.e., the plan year in which the notice is 
due). Thus, for a calendar year plan that must furnish its 2010 annual 
funding notice no later than the 120th day of 2011, the ``notice year'' 
is the 2010 plan year and the ``current plan year'' for purposes of 
paragraph (b)(7) of the proposal is the 2011 plan year. It is difficult 
to find meaning in the phrase ``a projection to the end of such year'' 
if ``current plan year'' is interpreted to mean the notice year because 
the notice year has already ended. On the other hand, the Department is 
interested in ensuring that the proposal results in all material effect 
events being disclosed and, therefore, specifically requests comments 
on the approach taken in the proposal.
    Section 101(f)(2)(B)(vi) of ERISA also provides that the Department 
will define by regulations when an event (i.e., plan amendment, 
scheduled benefit increase or reduction, or other known event) has a 
material effect on plan liabilities or assets for the year. Pursuant to 
this provision, paragraph (g)(1) of the proposed regulation provides 
that a plan amendment, scheduled benefit increase (or reduction), or 
other known event has a material effect on plan liabilities or assets 
for the current plan year if it results, or is projected to result, in 
an increase or decrease of five percent or more in the value of assets 
or liabilities from the valuation date of the notice year. For example, 
if the liabilities of a calendar year plan were $100 million on January 
1, 2010, (the valuation date for the 2010 notice year), a scheduled 
increase in benefits taking effect in 2011 will have a material effect 
if the present value of the increase, determined using the same 
actuarial assumptions used to determine the $100 million in 
liabilities, equals or exceeds $5 million. Alternatively, an event has 
a material effect on plan liabilities or assets for the current plan 
year if, in the judgment of the plan's enrolled actuary, the event is 
material for purposes of the plan's funding status under section 430 or 
431 of the Code, without regard to an increase or decrease of five 
percent or more in the value of assets or liabilities from the prior 
plan year. Paragraph (g)(3) of the proposal provides that, for purposes 
of paragraph (g)(1), assets and liabilities should be measured in the 
same manner that assets and liabilities are measured for purposes of 
establishing the plan's funding target attainment percentage or funded 
percentage under paragraph (b)(2) of the proposal.
    Paragraph (g)(2) of the proposal provides guidance on the type of 
events that could constitute an ``other known event'' for purposes of 
paragraph (b)(7) of the regulation. Such events include, but are not 
limited to, an extension of coverage under the existing terms of the 
plan to a new group of employees; a plan merger, consolidation, or 
spinoff pursuant to regulations under section 414(l) of the Code; a 
shutdown of any facility, plant, store, or such other similar corporate 
event that creates immediate eligibility for benefits that would not 
otherwise be immediately payable for participants separating from 
service; an offer by the plan for a temporary period to permit 
participants to retire at benefit levels greater than that to which 
they would otherwise be entitled; or a cost-of-living adjustment for 
retirees.
    In FAB 2009-01 (February 10, 2009), the Department provided interim 
guidance under section 101(f) of ERISA in the form of an enforcement 
policy. With respect to the material effect event provision in section 
101(f)(2)(B)(vi) of ERISA, the Department, in addressing when an 
amendment, scheduled increase, or other known event would have a 
``material effect'' on plan liabilities or assets, stated that ``as 
part of this enforcement policy, if an otherwise disclosable event 
first becomes known to the plan administrator 120 days or less before 
the due date for furnishing the notice, such event is not required to 
be included in the notice.'' See Question 12 of FAB 2009-01. The 
rationale behind this policy is that at some close point in time before 
the due date for furnishing the notice, it becomes impracticable for, 
and unreasonable to expect, plan administrators to satisfy the detailed 
material effect provisions even though an otherwise disclosable event 
is known. In addition, the event's effect on the plan's assets and 
liabilities will in any event be reflected in the next annual funding 
notice. While the Department has not included this policy in the 
proposed regulation, the Department nonetheless requests comments on 
whether it or a similar approach should be included in the final 
regulation.
h. Rules on Termination, Reorganization or Insolvency (Proposed Sec.  
2520.101-5(b)(8))
    Paragraph (b)(8) of the proposed regulation requires a summary of 
the rules under title IV of ERISA relating to plan termination, 
reorganization, or insolvency, as applicable. Specifically, in the case 
of single-employer plans, the proposal provides that a notice shall

[[Page 70631]]

include a summary of the rules governing termination of single-employer 
plans under subtitle C of title IV of ERISA. See proposed Sec.  
2520.101-5(b)(8)(i). In the case of multiemployer plans, the proposed 
regulation provides that a notice shall include a summary of the rules 
governing reorganization or insolvency, including limitations on 
benefit payments. See proposed Sec.  2520.101-5(b)(8)(ii).
i. PBGC Guarantees (Proposed Sec.  2520.101-5(b)(9))
    Paragraph (b)(9) of the proposed regulation requires a funding 
notice to include a general description of the benefits under the plan 
that are eligible to be guaranteed by the PBGC, and an explanation of 
the limitations on the guarantee and the circumstances under which such 
limitations apply.
j. Annual Report Information (Proposed Sec.  2520.101-5(b)(10))
    Paragraph (b)(10) of the proposed regulation provides that a 
funding notice shall include a statement that a person, including, in 
the case of a multiemployer plan, any labor organization representing 
plan participants and beneficiaries and any employer that has an 
obligation to contribute to the plan, may obtain a copy of the annual 
report of the plan filed under section 104(a) of ERISA upon request, 
through the Internet Web site of the Department of Labor 
(http:[sol][sol]www.efast.dol.gov), or through any Intranet Web site 
maintained by the applicable plan sponsor (or plan administrator on 
behalf of the plan sponsor). Under paragraph (b)(10), a plan 
administrator must furnish, on request, only copies of filed annual 
reports. Thus, for example, if, following the receipt of a funding 
notice in April 2011 for the 2010 plan year a plan participant requests 
a copy of the plan's 2010 annual report, which is completed, but not 
yet filed, the plan administrator is not required under section 101(f) 
of ERISA to furnish the 2010 report to the requesting participant. 
Consistent with paragraph (b)(12) of the proposed regulation, plans may 
include language in a funding notice explaining that the annual report 
for the plan for the notice year has not yet been filed and when such 
report is expected to be filed.
k. Information Disclosed to PBGC (Proposed Sec.  2520.101-5(b)(11))
    Paragraph (b)(11) of the proposed regulation, which applies only to 
single-employer plans, provides that, if applicable, a funding notice 
must include a statement that the contributing sponsor of the plan, and 
each member of the contributing sponsor's controlled group (other than 
an exempt entity within the meaning of 29 CFR 4010.4(c)), was required 
to provide to the PBGC the information under section 4010 of ERISA for 
the notice year. However, if the contributing sponsor of the plan is 
itself an exempt entity within the meaning of 29 CFR 4010.4(c), 
paragraph (b)(11) instead requires a statement that each member of the 
contributing sponsor's controlled group (other than an exempt entity) 
was required to provide the information under section 4010 of ERISA for 
the notice year. Section 4010 of ERISA generally requires sponsors (and 
each member of their controlled group) of certain underfunded plans 
(e.g., a plan with a funding target attainment percentage of less than 
80 percent, a plan with a minimum funding waiver in excess of $1 
million any portion of which is still outstanding, or a plan that has 
met the conditions for imposition of a lien for failure to make 
required contributions (including interest) with an unpaid balance in 
excess of $1 million) to report identifying, financial, and actuarial 
information about themselves and their plans to the PBGC. The statement 
required by paragraph (b)(11) of the proposed regulation is required 
only if there was a reporting obligation under section 4010 of ERISA 
for the notice year. In this regard, the Department specifically 
requests comment on whether, and to what extent, the differences in the 
timing requirements under sections 4010 and 101(f) of ERISA present any 
compliance problems for plan administrators, e.g., circumstances where, 
because of the potential differences between a plan year and an 
information year, as defined in 29 CFR 4010.5, a plan administrator 
will not know of the plan sponsor's 4010 reporting obligation for a 
particular information year by the deadline for furnishing the annual 
funding notice for a plan year that ends within such information year. 
Commenters are encouraged to provide specific examples of any 
compliance problems presented by paragraph (b)(11) of the proposal, as 
well as suggestions on how to address such problems.
l. Additional Information (Proposed Sec.  2520.101-5(b)(12))
    Paragraph (b)(12) of the proposed regulation permits the plan 
administrator to include in a funding notice any additional information 
that the administrator determines would be necessary or helpful to 
understanding the information required to be contained in the notice. 
Paragraph (b)(12) of the proposal does not include the rule in 29 CFR 
2520.101-4(b)(9) (the Department's regulation implementing the pre-PPA 
annual funding notice requirements for multiemployer plans, which 
ceased being effective for plan years beginning after December 31, 
2007) that required additional information, even if necessary or 
helpful, to be posted at the end of the funding notice under the 
heading ``Additional Explanation.'' This rule is not being included in 
the proposed regulation because of negative feedback received by the 
Department on the former rule following its promulgation. 
Representatives of plans commented that placing additional or 
explanatory information at the end of a funding notice disconnects the 
information being explained from the explanation itself, often making 
it more difficult, instead of making it easier, for participants to 
understand the information being explained. These individuals also 
commented that the rule is being viewed by some as an obstruction to 
furnishing a funding notice along with, or as part of, other plan 
disclosures or communications, resulting in stand-alone disclosure of 
the annual funding notice and increased administrative expenses to the 
plan.
    In addition to information that is ``necessary or helpful,'' 
paragraph (b)(12) of the proposed regulation also provides for 
inclusion of information that is ``otherwise permitted by law.'' This 
clause reflects the fact that some plan administrators may elect to 
satisfy the requirements of section 101(f) and other disclosure 
requirements through a combined notification. For example, where a plan 
elects the waiver described in 29 CFR 2520.104-46 (small pension plan 
audit waiver regulation), the plan administrator must include specified 
information about the waiver in the funding notice in order to satisfy 
the requirements of Sec.  2520.104-46. See section C of this preamble 
discussing Sec.  2520.104-46, as amended.

3. Form and Manner Requirements (Proposed Sec.  2520.101-5(c) and (e))

    Paragraphs (c) and (e) of the proposed regulation, respectively, 
set forth the style and format requirements and the manner of 
furnishing requirements relating to the funding notice. Paragraph (c) 
of the proposed regulation provides that funding notices shall be 
written in a manner that is consistent with the style and format 
requirements of 29 CFR 2520.102-2. Thus, notices shall be written in a 
manner calculated to be understood by the average plan participant and 
in a format that does not have the effect of misleading or misinforming 
recipients.

[[Page 70632]]

    Paragraph (e) of the proposal relates to how annual funding notices 
must be furnished to recipients, with paragraph (e)(1) addressing how 
notices must be furnished to participants and beneficiaries and 
paragraph (e)(2) addressing how notices must be furnished to the PBGC. 
The Department, however, has decided to reserve paragraph (e)(1) of the 
proposal for the same reason the Department reserved the manner of 
furnishing requirements in the recently published final participant-
level disclosure regulation, Sec.  2550.404a-5 (75 FR 64910, October 
20, 2010). In the preamble to the final participant-level disclosure 
regulation, the Department explained that, given the differing views on 
the use of and standards for electronic disclosure, it would be 
undertaking a review of the safe harbor applicable to the use of 
electronic media for furnishing information to plan participants and 
beneficiaries (29 CFR 2520.104b-1(c)). The Department further indicated 
that, in the very near future, it will be publishing a Federal Register 
notice requesting public comments, views, and data relating to the 
electronic distribution of plan information to plan participants and 
beneficiaries.
    Accordingly, as with the final participant-level disclosure 
regulation, pending the completion of its review and the issuance of 
further guidance, the general disclosure regulation at 29 CFR 
2520.104b-1 applies to annual funding notices required to be furnished 
to participants and beneficiaries, including the safe harbor for 
electronic disclosures at paragraph (c) of the general disclosure 
regulation. The Department anticipates that resolution of the issues 
involved with the electronic disclosure of plan information will 
directly affect the manner in which the annual funding notice may be 
furnished to participants and beneficiaries. Accordingly, interested 
persons are encouraged to participate in the Department's forthcoming 
solicitation of comments on the use of electronic media for furnishing 
plan information.
    Paragraph (e)(2) of the proposal provides that funding notices 
shall be furnished to the PBGC consistent with the requirements of 29 
CFR part 4000. The PBGC has advised the Department that it will accept 
electronic or hard copies of funding notices at the following postal 
and e-mail addresses: (1) For single-employer plans, hard copies of 
funding notices may be mailed to Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, 
ATTN: Single-Employer AFN Coordinator, 1200 K Street, NW., Suite 270, 
Washington, DC 20005-4026. Electronic copies of funding notices may be 
e-mailed to Single-employerAFN@PBGC.gov. (2) For multiemployer plans, 
hard copies of funding notices may be mailed to Pension Benefit 
Guaranty Corporation, ATTN: Multiemployer Data Coordinator, 1200 K 
Street, NW., Suite 930, Washington, DC 20005-4026. Electronic copies of 
funding notices may be e-mailed to Multiemployerprogram@PBGC.gov.

4. Timing Requirements (Proposed Sec.  2520.101-5(d))

    Paragraph (d) of the proposed regulation describes when a funding 
notice must be furnished to recipients. Paragraph (d)(1) of the 
proposal provides that notices generally must be furnished not later 
than 120 days after the end of the notice year. However, paragraph 
(d)(2) of the proposal provides that in the case of small plans, 
notices must be furnished no later than the earlier of the date on 
which the annual report is filed or the latest date the report could be 
filed (with granted filing extensions). For this purpose, a plan is a 
small plan if it had 100 or fewer participants on each day during the 
plan year preceding the notice year. See section 101(f)(3)(B) of ERISA 
(referencing section 303(g)(2)(B) of ERISA). Although section 
303(g)(2)(B) of ERISA relates to single-employer plans only, the 
Department interprets section 101(f)(3)(B) of ERISA as applying the 100 
or fewer participant standard in section 303(g)(2)(B) of ERISA to both 
single-employer and multiemployer plans.

5. Persons Entitled to Notice (Proposed Sec.  2520.101(5)(f))

    Paragraph (f) of the proposed regulation defines a person entitled 
to receive a funding notice as: Each participant covered under the plan 
on the last day of the notice year, each beneficiary receiving benefits 
under the plan on the last day of the notice year, each labor 
organization representing participants under the plan on the last day 
of the notice year, the PBGC, and, in the case of a multiemployer plan, 
each employer that, as of the last day of the notice year, is a party 
to the collective bargaining agreement(s) pursuant to which the plan is 
maintained or who otherwise may be subject to withdrawal liability 
pursuant to section 4203 of ERISA.

6. Model Notices (Proposed Sec.  2520.101-5(h))

    The appendices to Sec.  2520.101-5 include two model notices (one 
for single-employer plans and one for multiemployer plans) that may be 
used by plan administrators for section 101(f) of ERISA purposes. The 
model in Appendix A is for single-employer plans (including multiple 
employer plans) and the model in Appendix B is for multiemployer plans. 
These models are intended to assist plan administrators in discharging 
their notice obligations under section 101(f) of ERISA and the 
regulation. Use of a model notice is not mandatory. However, the 
proposed regulation provides that use of a model notice will be deemed 
to satisfy the content requirements in paragraph (b) of the regulation, 
as well as the style and format requirements in paragraph (c) of the 
regulation. To the extent a plan administrator elects to include in a 
model notice additional information described in paragraph (b)(12) of 
the proposed regulation, such additional information must be consistent 
with the style and format requirements in paragraph (c) of the proposed 
regulation. Thus, such additional information should not have the 
effect of misleading or misinforming recipients.
    In drafting the models, the Department attempted to develop and 
organize the models in a manner that will help the average plan 
participant understand and comprehend the information mandated by 
section 101(f) of ERISA, some of which is technical in nature. 
Nonetheless, the Department solicits comments on whether, and if so, 
how, the organization of the proposed models could be improved to 
enhance understandability and comprehensibility. For example, if a 
plan's funding percentage is the most important information for 
participants, does the chart format of the model adequately highlight 
this information or could other presentation techniques more 
effectively highlight this information?

7. Limited Alternative Method of Compliance for Furnishing Notice to 
PBGC (Proposed Sec.  2520.101-5(i))

    Section 101(f)(1) of ERISA provides that a plan administrator of a 
defined benefit plan to which title IV of ERISA applies shall, for each 
plan year, provide a funding notice to the PBGC, to each plan 
participant and beneficiary, to each labor organization representing 
such participants or beneficiaries, and, in the case of a multiemployer 
plan, to each employer with an obligation to contribute to the plan. 
Pursuant to section 110 of ERISA, paragraph (i) of the proposed 
regulation includes an alternative method of compliance pertaining to 
the requirement to furnish

[[Page 70633]]

notice to the PBGC. Under this alternative, the plan administrator of a 
single-employer plan with liabilities that do not exceed plan assets by 
more than $50 million is not required to furnish a funding notice to 
the PBGC provided that the administrator furnishes the latest available 
funding notice to the PBGC within 30 days of receiving a written 
request from the PBGC. In determining whether a plan's liabilities 
exceed its assets by more than $50 million, the proposed regulation 
provides that plan administrators should subtract the plan's total 
assets from its liabilities, using the assets and liabilities disclosed 
in the funding notice in accordance with paragraph (b)(3)(i)(A) of this 
proposed regulation.
    The Department has created this alternative method of compliance 
after consulting with the PBGC. The PBGC has determined that, in light 
of the extended funding notice due date for small plans, it will have 
electronic access to the information included on the funding notice for 
most single-employer plans as a result of ERISA's annual reporting 
requirement under section 104(a) on or around the time it would receive 
a copy of a funding notice under section 101(f) of ERISA and the 
proposed regulation. In addition, under the PBGC's Reportable Events 
regulation (29 CFR part 4043), the PBGC typically would receive 
information about certain events that might indicate increased exposure 
or risk before it would receive information under either ERISA section 
101(f) or 104(a). Also, the Department believes the alternative method 
of compliance will reduce administrative burden for plans that meet the 
conditions of paragraph (i) of the proposed regulation.
    At the request of the PBGC, the Department has limited the scope of 
the alternative method of compliance to single-employer plans. Because 
multiemployer plans are not subject to ERISA section 4043 and because 
very few multiemployer plans will qualify for the extended annual 
funding notice due date, the annual funding notice will provide a 
useful and non-duplicative source of information to the PBGC. The 
alternative method of compliance does not have any effect on the plan 
administrator's obligation to furnish notices to parties other than the 
PBGC.
    Section 110 of ERISA permits the Department to prescribe 
alternative methods of complying with any of the reporting and 
disclosure requirements of ERISA if it finds: (1) That the use of the 
alternative is consistent with the purposes of ERISA and that it 
provides adequate disclosure to plan participants and beneficiaries and 
to the Department; (2) that application of the statutory reporting and 
disclosure requirements would increase the costs to the plan or impose 
unreasonable administrative burdens with respect to the operation of 
the plan; and (3) that the application of the statutory reporting and 
disclosure requirements would be adverse to the interests of plan 
participants in the aggregate. Based on the discussion above, the 
Department finds these three conditions to be satisfied in this 
context.

8. Plans Not Immediately Subject to New Funding Rules or to Which 
Special Funding Rules Apply

    Sections 104, 105, and 106 of the PPA defer the effective date of 
the amendments made by title I of the PPA for certain plans described 
in those sections, i.e. certain plans of cooperatives, plans affected 
by settlement agreements with the PBGC, and plans of government 
contractors.\13\ Section 402 of the PPA applies special funding rules 
to certain plans of commercial passenger airlines and airline caterers. 
Section 402 of the PPA was amended by the U.S. Troop Readiness, 
Veterans' Care, Katrina Recovery, and Iraq Accountability 
Appropriations Act, 2007, Public Law 110-28. None of these provisions 
affects the applicability of the PPA amendments to section 101(f) of 
ERISA. Accordingly, the funding notice requirements of section 101(f) 
of ERISA apply to these plans for plan years beginning on or after 
January 1, 2008. These plans should disclose their funding target 
attainment percentage (and related asset and liability information) in 
accordance with guidance provided by the Secretary of the Treasury. For 
example, for a plan described in section 104, 105, or 106 of the PPA, 
the funding target attainment percentage of such plan is determined in 
accordance with paragraph (b)(2)(i) of the proposed regulation, except 
that the value of plan assets is determined without subtraction of the 
funding standard carryover balance or prefunding balance (credit 
balance under the funding standard account). See 26 CFR 1.430(d)-
1(b)(3)(ii). The model in Appendix A is available to such plans, but 
the portions of the model entitled ``Credit Balances'' and ``At-Risk 
Status'' should be deleted from the model before use for notice years 
beginning prior to the delayed effective date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ Section 202(b) of the Preservation of Access to Care for 
Medicare Beneficiaries and Pension Relief Act of 2010, Public Law 
111-192, amended section 104 of the Pension Protection Act of 2006, 
Public Law 109-280, by expanding the group of plans that is eligible 
for a deferred effective date under section 104 to include eligible 
charity plans.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department requests comment on whether, and to what extent, 
these plans would need special rules under section 101(f) of ERISA, if 
applicable, to reflect the delayed effective dates (in sections 104, 
105, or 106 of the PPA) or special funding rules (in section 402 of the 
PPA). Comments on this issue should explain why the delayed effective 
dates or special funding rules under the PPA necessitate a special rule 
or rules under section 101(f) of ERISA and the regulation being adopted 
herein, and whether, and how, the model notices in the appendices to 
the regulation could be modified for use by these plans.

9. Multiemployer Plans Terminated by Mass Withdrawal

    The proposed regulation does not provide an exemption or other 
relief for multiemployer plans that terminate by mass withdrawal 
pursuant to section 4041A(a)(2) of ERISA. Section 4041A(a)(2) provides 
that the termination of a multiemployer plan occurs as a result of the 
withdrawal of every employer from the plan or the cessation of the 
obligation of all employers to contribute under the plan.
    Plans that terminate in this fashion typically continue to pay 
benefits from a declining trust as payments come due and have no new 
contributions other than withdrawal liability payments. Therefore, the 
Department recognizes that some information required by the regulation 
may not be relevant (e.g., the plan's funded percentages) for plans 
that have terminated by mass withdrawal. Other mandated information, 
such as PBGC benefit guarantee levels, assets and liabilities, numbers 
and status of participants, and insolvency information, however, may be 
very important to participants and beneficiaries receiving benefits 
from such plans. Accordingly, the Department solicits comment on 
whether the final regulation should provide special rules for such 
plans. Comments should be specific regarding what, if any, information 
otherwise required by the regulation should not be included in the 
funding notice, and why, and what, if any, alternative information 
might be disclosed in its place. Comments should provide any data that 
would demonstrate cost savings to such plans as a result of alternative 
reporting under special rules.

10. Code Section 412(e)(3) Insurance Contract Plans

    The proposed regulation does not provide an exemption or any other 
relief

[[Page 70634]]

for certain insurance contract plans to which section 412(e)(3) of the 
Code appl