Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 69476-69477 [2010-28543]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
69476
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 218 / Friday, November 12, 2010 / Notices
Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (NDAA) was
passed by Congress and was signed by
the President on October 28, 2004.
Section 3116 of the NDAA allows the
DOE to determine that certain incidental
waste, stemming from reprocessing of
spent nuclear fuel, is not high-level
waste (HLW). Should these incidental
wastes, or Waste Incidental to
Reprocessing (WIR), meet the criteria
defined by the NDAA, they will be
disposed via near-surface disposal. The
NDAA is applicable only in the states of
South Carolina and Idaho and does not
apply to waste transported out of these
States. The NDAA requires that: (1) DOE
consult with NRC on its waste
determinations in South Carolina and
Idaho, and (2) NRC, in coordination
with the State, monitor disposal actions
taken by DOE for the purpose of
assessing compliance with NRC
regulations in 10 CFR part 61, subpart
C. If the NRC considers any disposal
actions taken by the DOE pursuant to
subparagraphs (A) or (B) of Section
3116(a)(3) of the NDAA to be not in
compliance with those performance
objectives, the NRC shall, as soon as
practicable after discovery of the
noncompliant conditions, inform the
DOE, the covered State, and Congress.
On November 16, 2006 and July 20,
2007, the NRC and DOE held public
meetings to discuss the efficiency and
effectiveness of the consultation
process. This meeting is part of a series
of continuing public lessons learned
meetings that the NRC and DOE hold
jointly. Since the November 2006 NRC/
DOE joint public meeting, many NDAA,
Section 3116 consultation and
monitoring activities have taken place at
the Savannah River Site. NRC is
currently fulfilling its monitoring role
for disposal actions at the Saltstone
Facility at the Savannah River Site and
consultation activities are underway as
the DOE has recently submitted the FTank Farm Performance Assessment
and Draft Waste Determination for NRC
review. The agencies will provide the
public with an update on NDAA Section
3116 activities, provide interested
stakeholders a chance to make
comments and ask questions, and
inform the public of future activities.
After the meeting, a publicly available
summary of this meeting will be made
available on the NRC’s Agencywide
Documents Access and Management
System at https://www.nrc.gov and on
the DOE webpage at https://
www.em.doe.gov/pages/
3116Summaries.aspx.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:23 Nov 10, 2010
Jkt 223001
Detailed Agenda
Speakers
Linda Suttora—Office of Environmental
Compliance, DOE, DOE HQ Project
Manager for SRS Section 3116
Activities
Sherri Ross—Savannah River Site,
Waste Disposition Programs
Division, DOE, DOE SR Project
Manager for Tank Farm Closures
Gregory Suber—Low-Level Waste
Branch Chief, NRC, Chief of NRC
Branch Responsible for WIR
Activities
Frank Marcinowski—Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Technical and
Regulatory Support, DOE
Larry W. Camper—Director of the
Division of Waste Management and
Environmental Protection, NRC
Agenda
7–7:10 Introductions and Opening
Remarks (Nishka Devaser, NRC
Saltstone Project Manager)
7:10–8 NDAA Section 3116 Process
(DOE, DOE–SR, and NRC)
Linda Suttora, DOE–HQ
Sherri Ross, DOE–SR
Gregory Suber, NRC
8–9 NDAA Section 3116 Challenges
and Accomplishments
NRC and DOE Perspectives on the
Challenges Posed by Section 3116
and the Accomplishments Made
Frank Marcinowski, DOE
Larry Camper, NRC
9–10 Opportunity for Public Questions
and/or Comment
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
questions related to this meeting, please
contact Nishka Devaser at (301) 415–
5196 or Nishka.Devaser@nrc.gov.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 8th day
of November 2010.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Gregory Suber,
Branch Chief, Low-Level Waste Branch,
Environmental Protection and Performance
Assessment Directorate, Division of Waste
Management and Environmental Protection,
Office of Federal and State Materials and
Environmental Management Programs.
[FR Doc. 2010–28644 Filed 11–10–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request
Upon Written Request, Copies Available
From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Investor
Education and Advocacy,
Washington, DC 20549.
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Extension:
Rule 17a–4(b)(11); SEC File No. 270–449;
OMB Control No. 3235–0506; Rule 17a–
3(a)(16).
Notice is hereby given that pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. Sec. 3501 et seq.), the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) has submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget
(‘‘OMB’’) a request for approval of
extension of the existing collection of
information provided for in the
following rule: Rule 17a–4(b)(11) (17
CFR 240.17a–4(b)(11)) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
U.S.C. 78a et seq.).
Rule 17a–4(b)(11) describes the record
preservation requirements for those
records required to be kept pursuant to
Rule 17a–3(a)(16), including how such
records should be kept and for how
long, to be used in monitoring
compliance with the Commission’s
financial responsibility program and
antifraud and antimanipulative rules as
well as other rules and regulations of
the Commission and the self-regulatory
organizations.
It is estimated that respondents will
incur a total burden of 2,835 hours per
year (105 respondents multiplied by 27
burden hours to comply with Rule 17a–
3(a)(16). It is estimated that
approximately 105 active broker-dealer
respondents registered with the
Commission will incur a total burden of
315 hours per year to comply with Rule
17a–4(b)(11), (105 respondents
multiplied by 3 burden hours per
respondent equals 315 total burden
hours).
The Commission estimates that an
employee of a broker-dealer charged to
ensure compliance with Rule 17a–
3(a)(16) receives annual compensation
of $238,000. This compensation is the
equivalent of $119 per hour ($238,000
divided by 2,000 payroll hours per
year). Thus, the average cost estimated
for each respondent would be $3,213:
Rule 17a–3(a)(16); Recordkeeping
requirements 27 hours at $119/hr =
$3,213.
The Commission estimates that an
employee of a broker-dealer charged to
ensure compliance with Rule 17a–
4(b)(11) receives annual compensation
of $238,000. This compensation is the
equivalent of $119 per hour ($238,000
divided by 2,000 pay roll hours per
year). Thus, the average cost estimated
for each respondent would be $357.00:
Rule 17a–4(b)(11); Record preservation
requirements 3 hours at $119/hr =
$ 357.
Accordingly, the annual aggregated
hour burden for each broker-dealer
required to comply with Rules 17a–
E:\FR\FM\12NON1.SGM
12NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 218 / Friday, November 12, 2010 / Notices
3(a)(16) and 17a–4(b)(11) would be
$3,570: ($3,213 + $357 = $3,570).
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid
control number.
Written comments are invited on: (a)
Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the proposed collection
of information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Consideration will be given to
comments and suggestions submitted in
writing within 60 days of this
publication.
Please direct your written comments
to Thomas Bayer, Chief Information
Officer, Securities and Exchange
Commission, C/O Remi Pavlik-Simon,
6432 General Green Way, Alexandria,
VA, 22312 or by sending an e-mail to:
PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov.
Dated: November 4, 2010.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010–28543 Filed 11–10–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–63273; File No. SR–OPRA–
2010–03]
Options Price Reporting Authority;
Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of Proposed Amendment
To Revise the Device-Based
Professional Subscriber Fees Charged
by OPRA for its Basic Service
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
November 8, 2010.
Pursuant to Section 11A of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 608 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on October
29, 2010, the Options Price Reporting
Authority (‘‘OPRA’’) submitted to the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) an amendment to the
Plan for Reporting of Consolidated
Options Last Sale Reports and
1 15
2 17
U.S.C. 78k–1.
CFR 242.608.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:23 Nov 10, 2010
Jkt 223001
Quotation Information (‘‘OPRA Plan’’).3
The proposed amendment would revise
the device-based professional subscriber
fees charged by OPRA in respect of its
Basic Service. A conforming revision is
proposed to be made to OPRA’s
Enterprise Rate Professional Subscriber
Fee. The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments from
interested persons on the proposed
OPRA Plan amendment.
I. Description and Purpose of the Plan
Amendment
The purpose of the amendment is to
make incremental increases in OPRA’s
device-based professional subscriber
fees in respect of its Basic Service and
in the Enterprise Rate charged to those
subscribers who elect that rate in place
of device-based fees. These increases
will be phased in over a four-year
period. Specifically, it is proposed to
increase the current $23 monthly per
device fee by $1.00 in each of the years
2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014. It is also
proposed to increase the Enterprise
Rate, currently a monthly fee of $23
times the number of a subscriber’s U.S.based registered representatives, by this
same amount in each of these years and
to make conforming changes to the
minimum monthly fee under the
Enterprise Rate. These increases will be
effective on January 1 in each year.
OPRA’s Basic Service currently consists
of market data and related information
pertaining to all of the options listed
and traded on its member Exchanges
(i.e., equity options and index options,
including foreign currency index
options) (‘‘OPRA Data’’). Professional
subscribers are persons who subscribe
to OPRA Data and do not qualify for the
reduced fees charged to nonprofessional
subscribers. OPRA’s Enterprise Rate is
based on the number of a professional
subscriber’s U.S. registered
representatives and independent
investment advisers who contract with
the subscriber to provide advisory
services to the subscriber’s customers.
3 The OPRA Plan is a national market system plan
approved by the Commission pursuant to Section
11A of the Act and Rule 608 thereunder (formerly
Rule 11Aa3–2). See Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 17638 (March 18, 1981), 22 S.E.C.
Docket 484 (March 31, 1981). The full text of the
OPRA Plan is available at https://
www.opradata.com.
The OPRA Plan provides for the collection and
dissemination of last sale and quotation information
on options that are traded on the participant
exchanges. The eight participants to the OPRA Plan
are BATS Exchange, Inc., Chicago Board Options
Exchange, Incorporated, C2 Options Exchange,
Incorporated, International Securities Exchange,
LLC, NASDAQW OMX BX, Inc., NASDAQ OMX
PHLX, Inc., NASDAQ Stock Market LLC, NYSE
Amex, Inc., and NYSE Arca, Inc.
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
69477
The proposed increases in the devicebased professional subscriber fee and in
the Enterprise Rate are intended to
generate revenues for OPRA and its
member exchanges that are needed to
cover actual and anticipated increases
in the costs of collecting, consolidating,
processing and disseminating options
market information and assuring the
reliability and integrity of that
information, as well as increases in
OPRA’s administrative costs. These
increases reflect the higher costs of
enhancements to and upgrades of the
OPRA system and related exchange
systems that are needed in order to
enable OPRA, its participant exchanges
and its vendors to handle a greater
volume of market information as a result
of the continuing expansion of listed
options trading and to provide a greater
degree of redundancy and security in
the OPRA system. Increases in
administrative costs largely reflect
higher employee costs. Assuming the
number of fee-liable devices and
registered persons remains the same,
OPRA estimates that the overall effect of
the proposed increases in professional
subscriber fees will be to increase
revenues derived from these fees by
approximately 4% in each of the four
years covered by the proposal.
The text of the proposed amendment
to the OPRA Plan is available at OPRA,
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room, https://opradata.com, and on the
Commission’s Web site at https://
www.sec.gov.
II. Implementation of the OPRA Plan
Amendment
Pursuant to paragraph (b)(3)(i) of Rule
608 under the Act,4 OPRA designated
this amendment as establishing or
changing a fee or other charge collected
on behalf of all of the OPRA Participants
in connection with access to or use of
OPRA facilities. In order to give persons
subject to these fees advance notice of
the changes, the first of these changes is
not proposed to be put into effect until
January 1, 2011. Notice of these fee
changes is being sent to OPRA Vendors
and Professional Subscribers at or about
the date of the filing.
The Commission may summarily
abrogate the amendment within sixty
days of its filing and require refiling and
approval of the amendment by
Commission order pursuant to Rule
608(b)(2) under the Act 5 if it appears to
the Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors,
or the maintenance of fair and orderly
4 17
5 17
E:\FR\FM\12NON1.SGM
CFR 242.608(b)(3)(i).
CFR 242.608(b)(2).
12NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 218 (Friday, November 12, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69476-69477]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28543]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, Washington, DC
20549.
Extension:
Rule 17a-4(b)(11); SEC File No. 270-449; OMB Control No. 3235-
0506; Rule 17a-3(a)(16).
Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Sec. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (``OMB'') a request for approval of extension of the
existing collection of information provided for in the following rule:
Rule 17a-4(b)(11) (17 CFR 240.17a-4(b)(11)) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.).
Rule 17a-4(b)(11) describes the record preservation requirements
for those records required to be kept pursuant to Rule 17a-3(a)(16),
including how such records should be kept and for how long, to be used
in monitoring compliance with the Commission's financial responsibility
program and antifraud and antimanipulative rules as well as other rules
and regulations of the Commission and the self-regulatory
organizations.
It is estimated that respondents will incur a total burden of 2,835
hours per year (105 respondents multiplied by 27 burden hours to comply
with Rule 17a-3(a)(16). It is estimated that approximately 105 active
broker-dealer respondents registered with the Commission will incur a
total burden of 315 hours per year to comply with Rule 17a-4(b)(11),
(105 respondents multiplied by 3 burden hours per respondent equals 315
total burden hours).
The Commission estimates that an employee of a broker-dealer
charged to ensure compliance with Rule 17a-3(a)(16) receives annual
compensation of $238,000. This compensation is the equivalent of $119
per hour ($238,000 divided by 2,000 payroll hours per year). Thus, the
average cost estimated for each respondent would be $3,213:
Rule 17a-3(a)(16); Recordkeeping requirements 27 hours at $119/hr =
$3,213.
The Commission estimates that an employee of a broker-dealer
charged to ensure compliance with Rule 17a-4(b)(11) receives annual
compensation of $238,000. This compensation is the equivalent of $119
per hour ($238,000 divided by 2,000 pay roll hours per year). Thus, the
average cost estimated for each respondent would be $357.00:
Rule 17a-4(b)(11); Record preservation requirements 3 hours at $119/hr
= $ 357.
Accordingly, the annual aggregated hour burden for each broker-
dealer required to comply with Rules 17a-
[[Page 69477]]
3(a)(16) and 17a-4(b)(11) would be $3,570: ($3,213 + $357 = $3,570).
An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid control number.
Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of
the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of
information on respondents, including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of information technology.
Consideration will be given to comments and suggestions submitted
in writing within 60 days of this publication.
Please direct your written comments to Thomas Bayer, Chief
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, C/O Remi
Pavlik-Simon, 6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, VA, 22312 or by
sending an e-mail to: PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov.
Dated: November 4, 2010.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-28543 Filed 11-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P