Progressive Furniture, Inc., Including On-Site Leased Workers From Onin Staffing, a Subsidiary of Sauder Furniture, Claremont, NC; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration, 69468 [2010-28489]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
69468
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 218 / Friday, November 12, 2010 / Notices
the public interest at this time. DEA has
investigated Archimica, Inc. to ensure
that the company’s registration is
consistent with the public interest. The
investigation has included inspection
and testing of the company’s physical
security systems, verification of the
company’s compliance with state and
local laws, and a review of the
company’s background and history.
Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823,
and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33,
the above named company is granted
registration as a bulk manufacturer of
the basic class of controlled substance
listed.
Dated: November 1, 2010.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of
Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement
Administration.
eligibility requirements of the Trade Act
of 1974, as amended.
Department of Labor’s prior decision is
appropriate.
Conclusion
Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of
August, 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
After careful review of the
application, I conclude that the claim is
of sufficient weight to justify
reconsideration of the U.S. Department
of Labor’s prior decision. The
application is, therefore, granted.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of
August, 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010–28491 Filed 11–10–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
Employment and Training
Administration
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
[TA–W–73,756]
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Progressive Furniture, Inc., Including
On-Site Leased Workers From Onin
Staffing, a Subsidiary of Sauder
Furniture, Claremont, NC; Notice of
Affirmative Determination Regarding
Application for Reconsideration
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–73,963]
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Dentek.com, D/B/A Nsequence Center
for Advanced Dentistry; Reno, NV;
Notice of Affirmative Determination
Regarding Application for
Reconsideration
By application dated July 16, 2010, a
petitioner requested administrative
reconsideration of the negative
determination regarding workers’
eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment
Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers
and former workers of the subject firm.
The determination was issued on June
22, 2010. The Department’s Notice of
Determination was published in the
Federal Register on July 7, 2010 (75 FR
39049). Workers are engaged in
employment related to the production of
dental prosthetics.
The initial determination was based
on the findings that worker separations
are not attributable to increased imports
of articles like or directly competitive
with dental prosthetics or a shift/
acquisition of these articles to a foreign
country by the workers’ firm.
In the request for reconsideration, the
petitioner provided additional
information regarding company imports
and operations.
The Department has carefully
reviewed the request for reconsideration
and the existing record and has
determined that the Department will
conduct further investigation to
determine if the workers meet the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:23 Nov 10, 2010
Jkt 223001
On July 19, 2010, the Department
issued a determination regarding
workers’ eligibility to apply for Trade
Adjustment Assistance (TAA)
applicable to workers and former
workers of the subject firm. The
Department’s Notice of Determination
was published in the Federal Register
on August 6, 2010 (75 FR 47635).
The initial investigation resulted in a
negative determination based on the
findings that there was no increase in
imports or shift to/acquisition from a
foreign country of decommissioning
services by the workers’ firm, and that
the workers’ firm did not produce an
article or supply a service that was used
by a firm with workers eligible to apply
for TAA in the production of an article
or supply of a service that was the basis
for TAA-certification.
Subsequent to the issuance of the
negative determination, the Department
was informed of a mistake in fact in the
case at hand.
Based on this new information, the
Department has determined that it is
appropriate for the Department to
conduct further investigation to
determine if the workers meet the
eligibility requirements of the Trade Act
of 1974, as amended.
Conclusion
After careful review, I conclude that
a reconsideration of the U.S.
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–73,210; TA–W–73,210A]
Metlife Moosic, PA, Metlife Clarks
Summit, PA; Notice of Affirmative
Determination Regarding Application
for Reconsideration
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[FR Doc. 2010–28520 Filed 11–10–10; 8:45 am]
[FR Doc. 2010–28489 Filed 11–10–10; 8:45 am]
By application dated August 2, 2010,
the petitioners requested administrative
reconsideration of the negative
determination regarding workers’
eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment
Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers
and former workers of the subject firm.
The determination was issued on July
14, 2010, and the Department’s Notice
of Determination was published in the
Federal Register on August 2, 2010 (75
FR 45163).
The initial investigation resulted in a
negative determination based on the
findings that there was no increase in
imports or acquisition from a foreign
country of software testing and quality
assurance services by the workers’ firm,
and that the workers’ firm did not
produce an article or supply a service
that was used by a firm with workers
eligible to apply for Trade Adjustment
Assistance (TAA) in the production of
an article or supply of a service that was
the basis for TAA-certification.
In the request for reconsideration, the
petitioners provided additional
information alleging the procurement by
the subject firm from foreign sources of
services like and directly competitive
with those produced by the petitioning
workers.
The Department has carefully
reviewed the request for reconsideration
and the existing record, and has
determined that the Department will
conduct further investigation to
determine if the workers meet the
eligibility requirements of the Trade Act
of 1974, as amended.
Conclusion
After careful review of the
application, I conclude that the claim is
of sufficient weight to justify
reconsideration of the U.S. Department
E:\FR\FM\12NON1.SGM
12NON1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 218 (Friday, November 12, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 69468]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28489]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-73,756]
Progressive Furniture, Inc., Including On-Site Leased Workers
From Onin Staffing, a Subsidiary of Sauder Furniture, Claremont, NC;
Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for
Reconsideration
On July 19, 2010, the Department issued a determination regarding
workers' eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA)
applicable to workers and former workers of the subject firm. The
Department's Notice of Determination was published in the Federal
Register on August 6, 2010 (75 FR 47635).
The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination
based on the findings that there was no increase in imports or shift
to/acquisition from a foreign country of decommissioning services by
the workers' firm, and that the workers' firm did not produce an
article or supply a service that was used by a firm with workers
eligible to apply for TAA in the production of an article or supply of
a service that was the basis for TAA-certification.
Subsequent to the issuance of the negative determination, the
Department was informed of a mistake in fact in the case at hand.
Based on this new information, the Department has determined that
it is appropriate for the Department to conduct further investigation
to determine if the workers meet the eligibility requirements of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended.
Conclusion
After careful review, I conclude that a reconsideration of the U.S.
Department of Labor's prior decision is appropriate.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of August, 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-28489 Filed 11-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
