Self-Regulatory Organizations; C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated: Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Relating to PULSe Fees, 69478-69481 [2010-28418]
Download as PDF
69478
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 218 / Friday, November 12, 2010 / Notices
markets, to remove impediments to, and
perfect the mechanisms of, a national
market system, or otherwise in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
III. Solicitation of Comments
[FR Doc. 2010–28547 Filed 11–10–10; 8:45 am]
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed OPRA
Plan amendment is consistent with the
Act. Comments may be submitted by
any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
No. SR–OPRA–2010–03 on the subject
line.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.6
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–63246; File No. SR–C2–
2010–007]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; C2
Options Exchange, Incorporated:
Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of Proposed Rule
Change Relating to PULSe Fees
November 4, 2010.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
Paper Comments
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
• Send paper comments in triplicate
notice is hereby given that on October
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
28, 2010, C2 Options Exchange,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
Incorporated (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘C2’’)
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
filed with the Securities and Exchange
20549–1090.
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
All submissions should refer to File
Items I, II and III below, which Items
Number SR–OPRA–2010–03. This file
have been prepared by the Exchange.
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the The Exchange has designated this
proposal as one establishing or changing
Commission process and review your
a due, fee, or other charge imposed by
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will the Exchange under Section
post all comments on the Commission’s 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act 3 and Rule 19b–
4(f)(2) thereunder.4 The Commission is
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
publishing this notice to solicit
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
comments on the proposed rule change
submission, all subsequent
from interested persons.
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed plan
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
amendment that are filed with the
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
Commission, and all written
the Proposed Rule Change
communications relating to the
The Exchange proposes to amend its
proposed plan amendment between the
Commission and any person, other than Fees Schedule to adopt fees for the use
of a front-end order entry workstation,
those that may be withheld from the
referred to as PULSe, that will be a
public in accordance with the
facility of the Exchange. The text of the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
proposed rule change is available on the
available for website viewing and
Exchange’s Web site (https://
printing in the Commission’s Public
www.cboe.org/legal), at the Exchange’s
Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Office of the Secretary and at the
Washington, DC 20549, on official
Commission.
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
also will be available for inspection and Statement of the Purpose of, and
copying at the principal office of OPRA. Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
All comments received will be posted
Change
without change; the Commission does
In its filing with the Commission, the
not edit personal identifying
Exchange included statements
information from submissions. You
concerning the purpose of and basis for
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
6 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(29).
submissions should refer to File
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
Number SR–OPRA–2010–03 and should
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
be submitted on or before December 3,
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
2010.
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:23 Nov 10, 2010
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections (A), (B), and (C) below,
of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of this proposed rule
change is to establish fees relating to the
use of the PULSe order entry
workstation on C2, which fees are
modeled after the fees established for C2
affiliates Chicago Board Options
Exchange, Incorporated (‘‘CBOE’’) and
the CBOE Stock Exchange (‘‘CBSX’’).
The PULSe workstation is a front-end
order entry system designed for use
with respect to orders that may be sent
to the trading systems of C2.5 In
addition to providing the capability to
send orders to the C2 market, the PULSe
workstation will also provide a user
with the capability to send options
orders to other U.S. options exchanges
(including CBOE) and stock orders to
other U.S. stock exchanges (including
CBSX) through a ‘‘PULSe Routing
Intermediary’’ as further described
below (‘‘away-market routing’’).
Additionally, the PULSe workstation
functionality will include access to
consolidated real-time options and stock
market data.6
The PULSe workstation will be made
available by Signal Trading Systems,
LLC (‘‘STS’’). STS is an affiliate of CBOE
that is jointly owned by CBOE and
FlexTrade Systems, Inc. (‘‘FlexTrade’’), a
technology services provider. STS will
grant licenses to use the workstation
directly to C2 Permit Holders (‘‘Permit
Holders’’) and their customers,
including Sponsored Users. STS may
5 The Exchange represents that the PULSe
workstation is merely a new front-end system
interface to existing C2 trading systems (i.e., it is a
new means of connecting to these existing trading
systems), and does not require any changes to the
Exchange’s surveillance or communications rules.
Further, there is no change to, or impact on, the
Exchange’s market structure as a result of the
PULSe workstations.
6 The workstation will also have the capability to
enable a user to send orders for commodity futures
and commodity options to designated contract
markets and other venues of the user’s choice at
which the user has trading privileges and to futures
commission merchants (each, an ‘‘FCM’’) and
introducing brokers (each, an ‘‘IB’’) of the user’s
choice. The workstation may also have the
capability to enable a user to send orders in other
non-security products to one or more destinations
of the user’s choice.
E:\FR\FM\12NON1.SGM
12NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 218 / Friday, November 12, 2010 / Notices
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
also determine to permit Permit Holders
to make the workstation available to
their customers, including Sponsored
Users, through the use of a sublicense.
However, whether the workstation
technology is obtained through a direct
license or sublicense from STS, any
order routed to C2 through a PULSe
workstation must be routed through a
Permit Holder or by a Sponsored User
(whose orders are sponsored by a Permit
Holder).7 The Permit Holder will also be
responsible for any applicable fees,
which are described below.
The Exchange proposes a monthly
PULSe workstation fee to Permit
Holders of $350 per Permit Holder
workstation per month for the first 10
PULSe workstations and $100 per
Permit Holder workstation per month
for each additional PULSe workstation.
As discussed further below, Permit
Holders may also make the workstation
available to their customers, which may
include non-broker dealer public
customers and non-Permit Holder
broker dealers (referred to herein as
‘‘non-Permit Holders’’). For such nonPermit Holder workstations, the
Exchange proposes to introduce a flat
fee of $350/month per workstation. In
instances where two or more Permit
Holders wish to make a PULSe
workstation available to the same nonPermit Holder customer, the Exchange
is proposing to introduce a fee
reduction. Under the reduction, if two
or more Permit Holders make the PULSe
workstation available to the same nonPermit Holder customer, then the
monthly fee will be $250 per
workstation per Permit Holder. The
Exchange also proposes an away-market
routing fee to the entering Permit Holder
of $0.10 per executed options contract
(or equivalent share amount in the case
of stock) for away-market routing of
orders through the PULSe workstation.
The Exchange notes that the PULSe
workstation offers the ability to route
orders to any market, including CBOE.
Therefore, to the extent a C2 TPH that
is also a CBOE TPH obtains a PULSe
workstation through C2, it is not
necessary for that TPH to obtain a
separate PULSe workstation through
CBOE to route orders to CBOE. When
the PULSe workstation is made
available through C2 to a C2 TPH that
7 The PULSe workstation may be made available
by a TPH to its customers on a pass-through basis
(where orders pass through the TPH’s systems prior
to reaching the Exchange) or a sponsored access
basis. To the extent that a TPH makes the
workstation available to a customer on a sponsored
access basis, the customer would be considered a
‘‘sponsored user’’ and the TPH-customer
relationship would be considered a Sponsoring
Participant/Sponsored User relationship subject to
the requirements of Rule 3.15, Sponsored Users.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:23 Nov 10, 2010
Jkt 223001
is also a CBOE TPH, the PULSe
workstation, away-market routing, and
Routing Intermediary fees would be
assessed by C2 only (e.g., the monthly
fee to a C2 TPH for one PULSe is $350
and the monthly fee for a CBOE TPH for
one PULSe workstation is $350; if a
PULSe workstation is made available
through C2 to a C2 TPH that is also a
CBOE TPH, the monthly fee would be
$350, not $700). To the extent a C2 TPH
is also a CBOE TPH, the away-market
routing fee would not apply for the
TPH’s executions on C2 or CBOE
because the fee is only applicable for
away-market routing. The TPH would
not be routing away, but instead would
be submitting orders directly to C2 as a
C2 TPH or CBOE as a CBOE TPH, as
applicable, where the TPH’s activity
would be subject to the transaction fee
schedule of C2 or CBOE, respectively.
However, to the extent a C2 TPH is not
a CBOE TPH, the away-market routing
fee would apply to the C2 TPH’s
executions on CBOE.
The Exchange believes the fee
structure represents an equitable
allocation of reasonable fees in that the
same fees are applicable to all users.
The Exchange believes the workstation
and routing intermediary fees are
competitive with fees applicable to
similar workstations that offer awaymarket routing services provided by
other exchanges. The Exchange also
believes it is reasonable and appropriate
to reduce the monthly PULSe
workstation fee when two or more TPHs
make a workstation available to the
same non-Permit Holder because, while
we would still establish and maintain
PULSe workstation technology
arrangements with each TPH, we also
anticipate that the non-Permit Holder’s
use of the workstation would be
distributed among the TPHs. In
addition, the Exchange believes that the
$0.10 away-market routing fee is
reasonable and appropriate in light of
the fact that it is small in relation to the
value to the user of the PULSe
workstation and its extensive
functionality, including its ability to
facilitate the routing of orders to any
securities exchange and in relation to
the total costs typically incurred in
routing and executing orders. The
Exchange believes it is not necessary to
apply this fee to a C2 TPH’s executions
on C2 (or to a dual C2 TPH/CBOE TPH’s
executions on CBOE) because the TPH
is not routing away. Instead the TPH is
submitting orders directly to C2 (or
CBOE, as applicable) where the activity
is subject to the transaction fee schedule
of C2 (or CBOE, respectively). The
Exchange also notes that use of the
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
69479
PULSe workstation and the awaymarket routing functionality available
through the PULSe workstation are not
compulsory. The services are to be
offered as a convenience to Permit
Holders and would not be the exclusive
means available to a Permit Holder to
send orders to C2, CBOE, CBSX or
intermarket.
The PULSe workstation may be
configured by the Exchange to cause C2
and/or CBOE to be the default
destination exchange(s) for individually
executed marketable option orders if C2
and/or CBOE is at the national best bid
or offer (‘‘NBBO’’), regardless of size or
time, but will allow any user to
manually override C2 and/or CBOE as
the default destination on an order-byorder basis.8 Similarly, the PULSe
workstation may also be configured by
the Exchange to cause CBSX to be the
default designation exchange for
individually executed marketable stock
orders if CBSX is at the NBBO,
regardless of size or time, but will allow
the user to manually override CBSX as
the default destination on an order-byorder basis. The workstation also
incorporates a function allowing option
(stock) orders at a specified price to be
sent to multiple exchanges with a single
click (‘‘sweep function’’). The sweep
function may be configured by the
Exchange to cause an option order to be
sent to C2 and/or CBOE for up to the
full size quoted by C2 and/or CBOE if
C2 and/or CBOE is at the NBBO.9
Similarly, the sweep function may be
configured by the Exchange to cause a
stock order to be sent to CBSX for up to
the full size quoted by CBSX if CBSX is
at the NBBO. Again, the away-market
8 Nothing about the PULSe order routing
functionality would relieve any Permit Holder that
is using the PULSe workstation from complying
with its best execution obligations. Specifically, just
as with any customer order and any other routing
functionality, a Permit Holder would have an
obligation to consider the availability of price
improvement at various markets and whether
routing a customer order through the PULSe
functionality would allow for access to
opportunities for price improvement if readily
available. Moreover, a Permit Holder would need to
conduct best execution evaluations on a regular
basis, at a minimum quarterly, that would include
its use of the PULSe workstation.
9 For example, if a Permit Holder were to enter
an option order to buy 250 contracts using the
sweep function at a time when C2 is at the NBBO
for 100 contracts, the sweep function will be
configured to send an order for 100 contracts to C2,
with the balance of the order routed as specified by
the Permit Holder entering the order from the
configurations offered by the PULSe workstation.
Nothing will require a person using the PULSe
workstation to use the sweep function, and, in this
same example, if the Permit Holder wished to route
the entire order for 250 contracts to an exchange
other than C2 using the PULSe workstation, the
Permit Holder will be free to manually override C2
as the default destination for the entire order.
E:\FR\FM\12NON1.SGM
12NON1
69480
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 218 / Friday, November 12, 2010 / Notices
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
routing functionality is to be offered as
a convenience to Permit Holders and
would not be an exclusive means
available to a Permit Holder to send
orders intermarket.10
To use the PULSe workstation to
route to other markets, a Permit Holder
must either be a PULSe Routing
Intermediary or establish a relationship
with a PULSe Routing Intermediary. A
‘‘PULSe Routing Intermediary’’ is a C2
Permit Holder that has connectivity to,
and is a member of, other options and/
or stock exchanges. If a Permit Holder
sends an order from the PULSe
workstation, the PULSe Routing
Intermediary will route that order to the
designated market on behalf of the
entering Permit Holder. For Permit
Holder convenience, CBOE will make
available a list of PULSe Routing
Intermediaries that provide third-party
routing services. The Exchange proposes
that each PULSe Routing Intermediary
be charged a fee of $20 per PULSe
workstation per month for each PULSe
workstation that is enabled to send
orders through that Routing
Intermediary if another Permit Holder
requests routing functionality through
that Routing Intermediary. The
Exchange is proposing that the PULSe
Routing Intermediary fee be waived
through December 31, 2010, thus this
fee will be assessed beginning January 1,
2011.
Finally, the Exchange proposes to
introduce a fee for non-standard
services provided by STS. Non-standard
services may include time and materials
for non-standard installations of or
modifications to PULSe to accommodate
a Permit Holder’s use of PULSe with
other technologies. The Exchange is
proposing a fee of $350 per hour plus
costs.
The Exchange believes that the PULSe
workstation will constitute a ‘‘facility’’ of
C2 11 to the extent that it is used with
respect to orders for options and other
securities.12 A portion of the fees
10 With respect to options (stocks), the Exchange
also notes that the away-market functionality in the
PULSe workstation will not displace the provisions
of the Options Order Protection and Locked/
Crossed Market Plan (Regulation NMS), which will
continue to apply in the circumstances described in
the Plan (Regulation NMS).
11 The Exchange believes that the PULSe
workstation will, in the language of Section 3(a)(2)
of the Act, 15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(2), constitute a property
or service ‘‘for the purpose of effecting or reporting
a transaction on an exchange * * *.’’
12 The capability of the workstation to initiate
orders for commodity futures and commodity
options and other non-security products to be sent
to a designated contract market, FCM, IB or other
destination that does not constitute an ‘‘exchange’’
(as that term is defined in Section 3(a)(1), 15 U.S.C.
78c(a)(1), and used in Section 3(a)(2), 15 U.S.C.
78c(a)(2), of the Act) will not constitute part of the
‘‘facility’’ of CBOE.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:23 Nov 10, 2010
Jkt 223001
collected by C2 for the use of the
workstation will be remitted to STS.13
The Exchange notes that FlexTrade
engages and will engage in business
activities in addition to its provision of
services to STS and that these activities
include providing other technology
services to broker-dealers.14 The
Exchange also notes that STS may in the
future engage in business activities in
addition to making the PULSe
workstation facility available, and that
these activities may also include the
provision of other technology services to
broker-dealers. In this regard: (i) There
will be procedures and internal controls
in place that are reasonably designed so
that FlexTrade does not unfairly take
advantage of confidential information
relating to PULSe in its other business
activities and so that STS will not
unfairly take advantage of confidential
information relating to PULSe to the
extent that STS engages in any other
business activities other than providing
the PULSe workstation. (ii) The books,
records, premises, officers, directors,
agents, and employees of STS, with
respect to the PULSe workstation, as a
facility of C2, will be deemed to be
those of C2 for purposes of and subject
13 FlexTrade is not, and, at least initially, will not
be registered as a broker-dealer under Section 15(a)
of the Act, 15 U.S.C. 78o. STS also will not, at least
initially, be registered as a broker-dealer under
Section 15(a) of the Act. In this regard, we note the
following: (i) C2 (and/or its affiliate, CBOE) will be
primarily responsible for the marketing of the
PULSe workstation. In no event will FlexTrade
have any role in marketing the PULSe workstation.
FlexTrade will not be a party to any agreements
with Permit Holders for the PULSe workstation. (ii)
In contributing services to STS, FlexTrade will be
limited to providing software and systems
technology and maintaining proper technical
functioning. C2 will be responsible for ensuring that
STS’s provision of the PULSe workstation, as a
facility of C2, meets C2’s obligations as a selfregulatory organization. (iii) Unless it becomes
registered as a broker-dealer under Section 15(a) of
the Act, neither STS nor FlexTrade will hold itself
out as a broker-dealer, provide advice related to
securities transactions, match orders, make
decisions about routing orders, facilitate the
clearance and settlement of executed trades,
prepare or send transaction confirmations, screen
counterparties for creditworthiness, hold funds or
securities, open, maintain, administer or close
brokerage accounts, or provide assistance in
resolving problems, discrepancies or disputes
related to brokerage accounts. Should STS or
FlexTrade seek to register as a broker-dealer in the
future, the Exchange represents that the brokerdealer would not perform any operations without
first discussing with the Commission staff whether
any of the broker-dealer’s operations should be
subject to an Exchange rule filing required under
the Act, 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
14 The Exchange notes that FlexTrade is the sole
member of a single member limited liability
company named FlexTrade LLC, that FlexTrade
LLC is a registered broker-dealer, and that
FlexTrade and FlexTrade LLC each currently makes
a front-end order entry workstation named
‘‘FlexTrader’’ available. FlexTrade LLC is not a
Permit Holder of C2.
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
to oversight pursuant to the Act. (iii)
Use of the PULSe workstation will be
optional. Permit Holders will not be
required to use the PULSe workstation
to initiate their orders, and a Permit
Holder may use any available order
entry system that it selects, including
one that it develops itself, for use to
initiate its orders.
2. Statutory Basis
The proposed rule change is
consistent with Section 6(b) of the
Act,15 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,16
in particular, in that it is designed to
provide for the equitable allocation of
reasonable dues, fees, and other charges
among C2 Permit Holders in that the
same fees and fee waivers are applicable
to all users of the PULSe workstation.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The proposed rule change is
designated by the Exchange as
establishing or changing a due, fee, or
other charge, thereby qualifying for
effectiveness on filing pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act 17 and
subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b–4 18
thereunder.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
15 15
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
17 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
18 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
16 15
E:\FR\FM\12NON1.SGM
12NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 218 / Friday, November 12, 2010 / Notices
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml) or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov Please include File
Number SR–C2–2010–007 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
[Release No. 34–63250; File No. SR–FINRA–
2010–053]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc.; Notice of Filing of
Proposed Rule Change Relating to
Amendments to the Panel Composition
Rule, and Related Rules, of the Code
of Arbitration Procedure for Customer
Disputes
November 5, 2010.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder, 2
All submissions should refer to File
notice is hereby given that on October
Number SR C2–2010–007. This file
25, 2010, the Financial Industry
number should be included on the
Regulatory Authority, Inc. (‘‘FINRA’’)
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission process and review your
Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’)
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will the proposed rule change as described
post all comments on the Commission’s in Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by FINRA. The
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
Commission is publishing this notice to
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
solicit comments on the proposed rule
submission, all subsequent
change from interested persons.
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
change that are filed with the
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
Commission, and all written
the Proposed Rule Change
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
FINRA is proposing to amend the
Commission and any person, other than panel composition rule, and related
those that may be withheld from the
rules, of the Code of Arbitration
public in accordance with the
Procedure for Customer Disputes
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
(‘‘Customer Code’’), to provide
available for Web site viewing and
customers with the option to choose an
printing in the Commission’s Public
all public arbitration panel in all cases.
Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
The text of the proposed rule change
Washington, DC 20549 on official
is available on FINRA’s Web site at
business days between the hours of 10
https://www.finra.org, at the principal
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing
also will be available for inspection and office of FINRA and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. All comments received will
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
be posted without change; the
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Commission does not edit personal
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
identifying information from
Change
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
In its filing with the Commission,
available publicly. All submissions
FINRA included statements concerning
should refer to File Number SR–C2–
the purpose of and basis for the
2010–007 and should be submitted on
proposed rule change and discussed any
or before December 3, 2010.
comments it received on the proposed
For the Commission, by the Division of
rule change. The text of these statements
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
may be examined at the places specified
authority.19
in Item IV below. FINRA has prepared
Florence E. Harmon,
summaries, set forth in sections A, B,
Deputy Secretary.
and C below, of the most significant
[FR Doc. 2010–28418 Filed 11–10–10; 8:45 am]
aspects of such statements.
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
1 15
19 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:23 Nov 10, 2010
2 17
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
69481
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
Background
Under FINRA Dispute Resolution
rules, parties in arbitration participate
in selecting the arbitrators who serve on
their cases. For customer claims of more
than $100,000, the Customer Code
currently provides for a three arbitrator
panel 3 comprised of a chair-qualified
public arbitrator, 4 a public arbitrator, 5
and a non-public arbitrator.6 FINRA
uses the computerized Neutral List
Selection System (‘‘NLSS’’) to generate
random lists of 10 arbitrators from each
of these categories. The parties select
their panel through a process of striking
and ranking the arbitrators on the lists
generated by NLSS. The Customer Code
permits the parties to strike the names
of up to four arbitrators from each list.
The parties then rank the arbitrators
remaining on the lists in order of
preference. FINRA appoints the panel
from among the names remaining on the
lists that the parties return.
FINRA is proposing to amend the
Customer Code to provide customers
with the option to choose between two
panel selection methods—the current
panel selection method, which would
be labeled ‘‘Composition Rules for
Majority Public Panel’’ (‘‘Majority Public
Panel’’), and a new panel selection
method, which would be labeled
‘‘Composition Rules for Optional All
Public Panel’’ (‘‘Optional All Public
Panel’’). Under the proposed rule
change, customers could choose the
panel selection method; neither firms
nor associated persons could choose the
selection method.
The Majority Public Panel option
would continue to provide for a panel
of one chair-qualified public arbitrator,
one public arbitrator, and one nonpublic arbitrator, and would retain the
current limit of four strikes for each
arbitrator list. The new Optional All
Public Panel provision, if chosen by the
customer, would allow parties to select
3 Rule 12401 provides for a single, chair-qualified
public arbitrator if the amount of the claim is not
more than $100,000. It provides for a three
arbitrator panel if the amount of a claim is more
than $100,000, or is unspecified, or if the claim
requests non-monetary damages. The parties, in
claims of more than $25,000, but not more than
$100,000, may agree in writing to have a three
arbitrator panel.
4 Rule 12400(c) specifies the criteria for arbitrator
inclusion on the chairperson roster.
5 Rule 12100(u) specifies the criteria FINRA uses
to classify arbitrators as public.
6 Rule 12100(p) specifies the criteria FINRA uses
to classify arbitrators as non-public.
E:\FR\FM\12NON1.SGM
12NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 218 (Friday, November 12, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69478-69481]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28418]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-63246; File No. SR-C2-2010-007]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated:
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change
Relating to PULSe Fees
November 4, 2010.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on October 28, 2010, C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated (the
``Exchange'' or ``C2'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II and III below, which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Exchange has designated this proposal as one establishing
or changing a due, fee, or other charge imposed by the Exchange under
Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2)
thereunder.\4\ The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend its Fees Schedule to adopt fees for
the use of a front-end order entry workstation, referred to as PULSe,
that will be a facility of the Exchange. The text of the proposed rule
change is available on the Exchange's Web site (https://www.cboe.org/legal), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary and at the
Commission.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections (A), (B), and (C) below, of the most significant aspects of
such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of this proposed rule change is to establish fees
relating to the use of the PULSe order entry workstation on C2, which
fees are modeled after the fees established for C2 affiliates Chicago
Board Options Exchange, Incorporated (``CBOE'') and the CBOE Stock
Exchange (``CBSX'').
The PULSe workstation is a front-end order entry system designed
for use with respect to orders that may be sent to the trading systems
of C2.\5\ In addition to providing the capability to send orders to the
C2 market, the PULSe workstation will also provide a user with the
capability to send options orders to other U.S. options exchanges
(including CBOE) and stock orders to other U.S. stock exchanges
(including CBSX) through a ``PULSe Routing Intermediary'' as further
described below (``away-market routing''). Additionally, the PULSe
workstation functionality will include access to consolidated real-time
options and stock market data.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The Exchange represents that the PULSe workstation is merely
a new front-end system interface to existing C2 trading systems
(i.e., it is a new means of connecting to these existing trading
systems), and does not require any changes to the Exchange's
surveillance or communications rules. Further, there is no change
to, or impact on, the Exchange's market structure as a result of the
PULSe workstations.
\6\ The workstation will also have the capability to enable a
user to send orders for commodity futures and commodity options to
designated contract markets and other venues of the user's choice at
which the user has trading privileges and to futures commission
merchants (each, an ``FCM'') and introducing brokers (each, an
``IB'') of the user's choice. The workstation may also have the
capability to enable a user to send orders in other non-security
products to one or more destinations of the user's choice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The PULSe workstation will be made available by Signal Trading
Systems, LLC (``STS''). STS is an affiliate of CBOE that is jointly
owned by CBOE and FlexTrade Systems, Inc. (``FlexTrade''), a technology
services provider. STS will grant licenses to use the workstation
directly to C2 Permit Holders (``Permit Holders'') and their customers,
including Sponsored Users. STS may
[[Page 69479]]
also determine to permit Permit Holders to make the workstation
available to their customers, including Sponsored Users, through the
use of a sublicense. However, whether the workstation technology is
obtained through a direct license or sublicense from STS, any order
routed to C2 through a PULSe workstation must be routed through a
Permit Holder or by a Sponsored User (whose orders are sponsored by a
Permit Holder).\7\ The Permit Holder will also be responsible for any
applicable fees, which are described below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ The PULSe workstation may be made available by a TPH to its
customers on a pass-through basis (where orders pass through the
TPH's systems prior to reaching the Exchange) or a sponsored access
basis. To the extent that a TPH makes the workstation available to a
customer on a sponsored access basis, the customer would be
considered a ``sponsored user'' and the TPH-customer relationship
would be considered a Sponsoring Participant/Sponsored User
relationship subject to the requirements of Rule 3.15, Sponsored
Users.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes a monthly PULSe workstation fee to Permit
Holders of $350 per Permit Holder workstation per month for the first
10 PULSe workstations and $100 per Permit Holder workstation per month
for each additional PULSe workstation. As discussed further below,
Permit Holders may also make the workstation available to their
customers, which may include non-broker dealer public customers and
non-Permit Holder broker dealers (referred to herein as ``non-Permit
Holders''). For such non-Permit Holder workstations, the Exchange
proposes to introduce a flat fee of $350/month per workstation. In
instances where two or more Permit Holders wish to make a PULSe
workstation available to the same non-Permit Holder customer, the
Exchange is proposing to introduce a fee reduction. Under the
reduction, if two or more Permit Holders make the PULSe workstation
available to the same non-Permit Holder customer, then the monthly fee
will be $250 per workstation per Permit Holder. The Exchange also
proposes an away-market routing fee to the entering Permit Holder of
$0.10 per executed options contract (or equivalent share amount in the
case of stock) for away-market routing of orders through the PULSe
workstation.
The Exchange notes that the PULSe workstation offers the ability to
route orders to any market, including CBOE. Therefore, to the extent a
C2 TPH that is also a CBOE TPH obtains a PULSe workstation through C2,
it is not necessary for that TPH to obtain a separate PULSe workstation
through CBOE to route orders to CBOE. When the PULSe workstation is
made available through C2 to a C2 TPH that is also a CBOE TPH, the
PULSe workstation, away-market routing, and Routing Intermediary fees
would be assessed by C2 only (e.g., the monthly fee to a C2 TPH for one
PULSe is $350 and the monthly fee for a CBOE TPH for one PULSe
workstation is $350; if a PULSe workstation is made available through
C2 to a C2 TPH that is also a CBOE TPH, the monthly fee would be $350,
not $700). To the extent a C2 TPH is also a CBOE TPH, the away-market
routing fee would not apply for the TPH's executions on C2 or CBOE
because the fee is only applicable for away-market routing. The TPH
would not be routing away, but instead would be submitting orders
directly to C2 as a C2 TPH or CBOE as a CBOE TPH, as applicable, where
the TPH's activity would be subject to the transaction fee schedule of
C2 or CBOE, respectively. However, to the extent a C2 TPH is not a CBOE
TPH, the away-market routing fee would apply to the C2 TPH's executions
on CBOE.
The Exchange believes the fee structure represents an equitable
allocation of reasonable fees in that the same fees are applicable to
all users. The Exchange believes the workstation and routing
intermediary fees are competitive with fees applicable to similar
workstations that offer away-market routing services provided by other
exchanges. The Exchange also believes it is reasonable and appropriate
to reduce the monthly PULSe workstation fee when two or more TPHs make
a workstation available to the same non-Permit Holder because, while we
would still establish and maintain PULSe workstation technology
arrangements with each TPH, we also anticipate that the non-Permit
Holder's use of the workstation would be distributed among the TPHs. In
addition, the Exchange believes that the $0.10 away-market routing fee
is reasonable and appropriate in light of the fact that it is small in
relation to the value to the user of the PULSe workstation and its
extensive functionality, including its ability to facilitate the
routing of orders to any securities exchange and in relation to the
total costs typically incurred in routing and executing orders. The
Exchange believes it is not necessary to apply this fee to a C2 TPH's
executions on C2 (or to a dual C2 TPH/CBOE TPH's executions on CBOE)
because the TPH is not routing away. Instead the TPH is submitting
orders directly to C2 (or CBOE, as applicable) where the activity is
subject to the transaction fee schedule of C2 (or CBOE, respectively).
The Exchange also notes that use of the PULSe workstation and the away-
market routing functionality available through the PULSe workstation
are not compulsory. The services are to be offered as a convenience to
Permit Holders and would not be the exclusive means available to a
Permit Holder to send orders to C2, CBOE, CBSX or intermarket.
The PULSe workstation may be configured by the Exchange to cause C2
and/or CBOE to be the default destination exchange(s) for individually
executed marketable option orders if C2 and/or CBOE is at the national
best bid or offer (``NBBO''), regardless of size or time, but will
allow any user to manually override C2 and/or CBOE as the default
destination on an order-by-order basis.\8\ Similarly, the PULSe
workstation may also be configured by the Exchange to cause CBSX to be
the default designation exchange for individually executed marketable
stock orders if CBSX is at the NBBO, regardless of size or time, but
will allow the user to manually override CBSX as the default
destination on an order-by-order basis. The workstation also
incorporates a function allowing option (stock) orders at a specified
price to be sent to multiple exchanges with a single click (``sweep
function''). The sweep function may be configured by the Exchange to
cause an option order to be sent to C2 and/or CBOE for up to the full
size quoted by C2 and/or CBOE if C2 and/or CBOE is at the NBBO.\9\
Similarly, the sweep function may be configured by the Exchange to
cause a stock order to be sent to CBSX for up to the full size quoted
by CBSX if CBSX is at the NBBO. Again, the away-market
[[Page 69480]]
routing functionality is to be offered as a convenience to Permit
Holders and would not be an exclusive means available to a Permit
Holder to send orders intermarket.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Nothing about the PULSe order routing functionality would
relieve any Permit Holder that is using the PULSe workstation from
complying with its best execution obligations. Specifically, just as
with any customer order and any other routing functionality, a
Permit Holder would have an obligation to consider the availability
of price improvement at various markets and whether routing a
customer order through the PULSe functionality would allow for
access to opportunities for price improvement if readily available.
Moreover, a Permit Holder would need to conduct best execution
evaluations on a regular basis, at a minimum quarterly, that would
include its use of the PULSe workstation.
\9\ For example, if a Permit Holder were to enter an option
order to buy 250 contracts using the sweep function at a time when
C2 is at the NBBO for 100 contracts, the sweep function will be
configured to send an order for 100 contracts to C2, with the
balance of the order routed as specified by the Permit Holder
entering the order from the configurations offered by the PULSe
workstation. Nothing will require a person using the PULSe
workstation to use the sweep function, and, in this same example, if
the Permit Holder wished to route the entire order for 250 contracts
to an exchange other than C2 using the PULSe workstation, the Permit
Holder will be free to manually override C2 as the default
destination for the entire order.
\10\ With respect to options (stocks), the Exchange also notes
that the away-market functionality in the PULSe workstation will not
displace the provisions of the Options Order Protection and Locked/
Crossed Market Plan (Regulation NMS), which will continue to apply
in the circumstances described in the Plan (Regulation NMS).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To use the PULSe workstation to route to other markets, a Permit
Holder must either be a PULSe Routing Intermediary or establish a
relationship with a PULSe Routing Intermediary. A ``PULSe Routing
Intermediary'' is a C2 Permit Holder that has connectivity to, and is a
member of, other options and/or stock exchanges. If a Permit Holder
sends an order from the PULSe workstation, the PULSe Routing
Intermediary will route that order to the designated market on behalf
of the entering Permit Holder. For Permit Holder convenience, CBOE will
make available a list of PULSe Routing Intermediaries that provide
third-party routing services. The Exchange proposes that each PULSe
Routing Intermediary be charged a fee of $20 per PULSe workstation per
month for each PULSe workstation that is enabled to send orders through
that Routing Intermediary if another Permit Holder requests routing
functionality through that Routing Intermediary. The Exchange is
proposing that the PULSe Routing Intermediary fee be waived through
December 31, 2010, thus this fee will be assessed beginning January 1,
2011.
Finally, the Exchange proposes to introduce a fee for non-standard
services provided by STS. Non-standard services may include time and
materials for non-standard installations of or modifications to PULSe
to accommodate a Permit Holder's use of PULSe with other technologies.
The Exchange is proposing a fee of $350 per hour plus costs.
The Exchange believes that the PULSe workstation will constitute a
``facility'' of C2 \11\ to the extent that it is used with respect to
orders for options and other securities.\12\ A portion of the fees
collected by C2 for the use of the workstation will be remitted to
STS.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ The Exchange believes that the PULSe workstation will, in
the language of Section 3(a)(2) of the Act, 15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(2),
constitute a property or service ``for the purpose of effecting or
reporting a transaction on an exchange * * *.''
\12\ The capability of the workstation to initiate orders for
commodity futures and commodity options and other non-security
products to be sent to a designated contract market, FCM, IB or
other destination that does not constitute an ``exchange'' (as that
term is defined in Section 3(a)(1), 15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(1), and used in
Section 3(a)(2), 15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(2), of the Act) will not
constitute part of the ``facility'' of CBOE.
\13\ FlexTrade is not, and, at least initially, will not be
registered as a broker-dealer under Section 15(a) of the Act, 15
U.S.C. 78o. STS also will not, at least initially, be registered as
a broker-dealer under Section 15(a) of the Act. In this regard, we
note the following: (i) C2 (and/or its affiliate, CBOE) will be
primarily responsible for the marketing of the PULSe workstation. In
no event will FlexTrade have any role in marketing the PULSe
workstation. FlexTrade will not be a party to any agreements with
Permit Holders for the PULSe workstation. (ii) In contributing
services to STS, FlexTrade will be limited to providing software and
systems technology and maintaining proper technical functioning. C2
will be responsible for ensuring that STS's provision of the PULSe
workstation, as a facility of C2, meets C2's obligations as a self-
regulatory organization. (iii) Unless it becomes registered as a
broker-dealer under Section 15(a) of the Act, neither STS nor
FlexTrade will hold itself out as a broker-dealer, provide advice
related to securities transactions, match orders, make decisions
about routing orders, facilitate the clearance and settlement of
executed trades, prepare or send transaction confirmations, screen
counterparties for creditworthiness, hold funds or securities, open,
maintain, administer or close brokerage accounts, or provide
assistance in resolving problems, discrepancies or disputes related
to brokerage accounts. Should STS or FlexTrade seek to register as a
broker-dealer in the future, the Exchange represents that the
broker-dealer would not perform any operations without first
discussing with the Commission staff whether any of the broker-
dealer's operations should be subject to an Exchange rule filing
required under the Act, 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange notes that FlexTrade engages and will engage in
business activities in addition to its provision of services to STS and
that these activities include providing other technology services to
broker-dealers.\14\ The Exchange also notes that STS may in the future
engage in business activities in addition to making the PULSe
workstation facility available, and that these activities may also
include the provision of other technology services to broker-dealers.
In this regard: (i) There will be procedures and internal controls in
place that are reasonably designed so that FlexTrade does not unfairly
take advantage of confidential information relating to PULSe in its
other business activities and so that STS will not unfairly take
advantage of confidential information relating to PULSe to the extent
that STS engages in any other business activities other than providing
the PULSe workstation. (ii) The books, records, premises, officers,
directors, agents, and employees of STS, with respect to the PULSe
workstation, as a facility of C2, will be deemed to be those of C2 for
purposes of and subject to oversight pursuant to the Act. (iii) Use of
the PULSe workstation will be optional. Permit Holders will not be
required to use the PULSe workstation to initiate their orders, and a
Permit Holder may use any available order entry system that it selects,
including one that it develops itself, for use to initiate its orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ The Exchange notes that FlexTrade is the sole member of a
single member limited liability company named FlexTrade LLC, that
FlexTrade LLC is a registered broker-dealer, and that FlexTrade and
FlexTrade LLC each currently makes a front-end order entry
workstation named ``FlexTrader'' available. FlexTrade LLC is not a
Permit Holder of C2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the
Act,\15\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of
the Act,\16\ in particular, in that it is designed to provide for the
equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among
C2 Permit Holders in that the same fees and fee waivers are applicable
to all users of the PULSe workstation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\16\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The proposed rule change is designated by the Exchange as
establishing or changing a due, fee, or other charge, thereby
qualifying for effectiveness on filing pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \17\ and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b-4
\18\ thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
\18\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
[[Page 69481]]
Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml) or
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov Please include
File Number SR-C2-2010-007 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR C2-2010-007. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-C2-2010-007 and should be
submitted on or before December 3, 2010.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-28418 Filed 11-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P