Proposed Information Collection Request (ICR) for the Workforce Investment Act Random Assignment Impact Evaluation of the Adult and Dislocated Worker Program; Comment Request, 69126-69128 [2010-28322]
Download as PDF
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
69126
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 217 / Wednesday, November 10, 2010 / Notices
Court for the Western District of
Pennsylvania.
In a complaint, filed simultaneously
with the Decree, the United States
alleges that the Slippery Rock
University and the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania violated the Clean Air
Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq., and 25 Pa.
Code §§ 123.11, 123.41 and 123.444,
regulations included in the
Pennsylvania State Implementation
Plan, by causing excess particulate
emissions from boilers on the university
campus.
Pursuant to the Decree, Slippery Rock
University and the Commonwealth will
install pollution control technology to
reduce particulate emissions, will
comply with the regulatory emissions
limits for particulate matter, will store
its coal in a coal storage building to
protect coal from degradation, and will
perform periodic testing to ensure that
the facility is complying with the
emissions limits. Slippery Rock and the
Commonwealth will also pay a $50,000
civil penalty to the United States
pursuant to the Decree.
The Department of Justice will
receive, for a period of thirty (30) days
from the date of this publication,
comments relating to the Decree.
Comments should be addressed to the
Assistant Attorney General,
Environment and Natural Resources
Division, and either e-mailed to
pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov or
mailed to P.O. Box 7611, U.S.
Department of Justice, Washington, DC
20044–7611, and should refer to United
States v. Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania, D.J. Ref. 90–5–2–1–
07931.
During the public comment period,
the Decree may also be examined on the
following Department of Justice Web
site, https://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/
Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the
Decree may also be obtained by mail
from the Consent Decree Library, P.O.
Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice,
Washington, DC 20044–7611 or by
faxing or e-mailing a request to Tonia
Fleetwood (tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov),
fax no. (202) 514–0097, phone
confirmation number (202) 514–1547. In
requesting a copy from the Consent
Decree Library, please enclose a check
in the amount of $7.75 (25 cents per
page reproduction cost) payable to the
U.S. Treasury or, if by e-mail or fax,
forward a check in that amount to the
Consent Decree Library at the stated
address.
Maureen Katz,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental
Enforcement Section, Environment and
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2010–28311 Filed 11–9–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Proposed Information Collection
Request (ICR) for the Workforce
Investment Act Random Assignment
Impact Evaluation of the Adult and
Dislocated Worker Program; Comment
Request
Employment and Training
Administration (ETA), Labor.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of Labor
(DOL or Department), as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
and respondent burden, conducts a
preclearance consultation program to
provide the general public and Federal
agencies with an opportunity to
comment on proposed and/or
continuing collections of information in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) [44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)]. This program helps to
ensure that required data can be
provided in the desired format,
reporting burden (time and financial
resources) is minimized, collection
instruments are clearly understood, and
the impact of collection requirements on
respondents can be properly assessed.
The Department notes that a Federal
agency cannot conduct or sponsor a
collection of information unless it is
approved by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) under the PRA, and
displays a currently valid OMB control
number, and the public is not required
to respond to a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number. Also, notwithstanding
any other provisions of law, no person
shall be subject to penalty for failing to
comply with a collection of information
if the collection of information does not
display a currently valid OMB control
number. See 5 CFR 1320.5(a) and
1320.6.
A copy of the proposed ICR can be
obtained by contacting the office listed
below in the addressee section of this
notice or by accessing: https://
www.doleta.gov/OMBCN/
OMBControlNumber.cfm.
SUMMARY:
Written comments must be
submitted to the office listed in the
DATES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:25 Nov 09, 2010
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
addressee section below on or before
January 10, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Eileen
Pederson, U.S. Department of Labor,
Employment and Training
Administration, Office of Policy
Development and Research, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Frances
Perkins Bldg., Room N–5641,
Washington, DC, 20210, telephone
number (202) 693–3647 (this is not a
toll-free number). Her e-mail address is
Pederson.eileen@dol.gov and fax
number is (202) 693–2766 (this is not a
toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In 1998, Congress significantly
reformed the public workforce
investment system by replacing the Job
Training Partnership Act (JTPA) with
the Workforce Investment Act (WIA).
Key WIA reforms included
consolidating the fragmented system of
employment and training programs
under JTPA and providing universal
access to basic (core) services. To
determine whether the adult and
dislocated worker services funded by
Title I of the WIA are effective, ETA is
undertaking the WIA Random
Assignment Impact Evaluation of the
Adult and Dislocated Worker Programs.
ETA has contracted with Mathematica
Policy Research and its subcontractors
—Social Policy Research Associates,
MDRC, and the Corporation for a Skilled
Workforce—to conduct this evaluation.
The evaluation will address the
following research questions:
• Does access to WIA intensive and
training services—both individually and
combined—lead adults and dislocated
workers to achieve better educational,
employment, earnings, and selfsufficiency outcomes than they would
achieve in the absence of access to those
services?
• Does the effectiveness of WIA vary
by population subgroup? Is there
variation by sex, age, race/ethnicity,
unemployment insurance (UI) receipt,
education level, previous employment
history, adult and dislocated worker
status, and veteran and disability status?
• How does the implementation of
WIA vary by Local Workforce
Investment Area (LWIA)? Does the
effectiveness of WIA vary by how it is
implemented? To what extent do
implementation differences explain
variations in WIA’s effectiveness?
• Do the benefits from WIA services
exceed program costs? Do the benefits of
intensive services exceed their costs? Do
the benefits of training exceed its costs?
Do the benefits exceed the costs for
adults? Do they for dislocated workers?
E:\FR\FM\10NON1.SGM
10NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 217 / Wednesday, November 10, 2010 / Notices
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
To obtain rigorous, nationally
representative estimates of WIA’s
effectiveness, the evaluation will take
place in 30 randomly selected LWIAs.
WIA applicants who are eligible for
intensive services will be randomly
assigned to one of three groups. The
three research groups to which they will
be assigned are: (1) The full-WIA
group—adults and dislocated workers in
this group can receive any WIA services
for which they are eligible, (2) the coreand-intensive group—adults and
dislocated workers in this group can
receive any WIA services for which they
are eligible other than training, and (3)
the core-only group—adults and
dislocated workers in this group can
receive only WIA core services but no
intensive or training services.
Applicants who do not consent to
participate in the study will be allowed
to receive core services only. The
sample intake period will be about 18
months at each site. A total of about
68,000 WIA adult and dislocated worker
applicants will be randomly assigned to
the evaluation. Data for the study will
be collected from the following five
major sources:
• 1. Study Enrollment Forms. Three
forms will be used at intake to enroll
participants into the study, a consent
form, a baseline information form (BIF),
and a contact information form (CIF).
WIA adult and dislocated worker
applicants will be asked to sign a
consent form to confirm that they have
been informed about the study and
agree to participate. During the study
enrollment process and after agreeing to
participate in the study, information on
each participant’s basic demographic
and socio-economic characteristics will
be collected on a short BIF. In addition,
contact information will be collected on
the CIF.
• 2. Two Follow-Up Surveys. Followup telephone surveys will be conducted
with 6,000 study participants. These
will be conducted at about 15 and 30
months after random assignment. The
first survey will collect baseline data
that will not have changed since
random assignment, such as place of
birth. Both surveys will collect data on
study participants’ receipt of services
and outcomes on attainment of
education credentials, labor market
outcomes, and family self-sufficiency.
• 3. WIA Service and Cost Data. To
ensure that random assignment is being
implemented correctly, as well as to
collect data on the receipt of WIA
services, data extracts from the State
and/or local management information
systems will be requested. If data on all
services are not regularly collected in a
site’s specific management information
system, then Mathematica will negotiate
with that site to determine the best way
to obtain basic service data, whether it
is from another system, from
modifications to their system, or from
staff recording service provision in a
study-specific system. Data on LWIA
expenditures during the study period
will be collected through quarterly
reports that the LWIAs routinely submit
to ETA. In addition, data on the costs of
each service (for example, staff time and
cost, cost of materials, overhead) will be
collected through cost collection forms
and interviews with program staff
during the second site visit.
• 4. Administrative Data from Other
Agencies and Programs. Both baseline
(such as past earnings) and outcome
data on quarterly earnings and UI
benefits will be collected from records
of state UI agencies. Data on service and
benefit receipt may also be collected
from the Employment Service, Social
Security Administration, Temporary
Assistance for Needy Families Program,
and/or the Supplemental Nutrition
Assistance Program.
• 5. Site Visits. Data on the context
for the program and its implementation
will be collected during two rounds of
site visits to each of the 30 sites. The
site visits will involve interviews with
key staff, group interviews with study
participants, observations of program
activities, and case file reviews.
II. Desired Focus of Comments
Currently, the Department is soliciting
comments concerning the above data
collection for the WIA Random
Assignment Impact Evaluation.
Comments are requested to:
• Evaluate whether the proposed ICR
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
Total
respondents
Respondents
Intake forms:
Study Participants ...........................................................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:25 Nov 09, 2010
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00082
68,000
Fmt 4703
proposed ICR, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the ICR; and
• Minimize the burden of the ICR on
those who are to respond, including the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submissions
of responses.
III. Current Actions
At this time, ETA is requesting
clearance for the three study enrollment
forms (the consent form, the BIF, and
the CIF) and the protocols for the site
visits. A future request will be
submitted for the follow-up surveys and
the cost collection forms.
Type of review: New ICR.
OMB Number:
Affected Public: WIA Customers and
Staff at 30 One-Stop Career Centers
Cite/Reference/Form/etc.: Workforce
Investment Act Section 172.
For the study enrollment forms:
Frequency: One-time collection.
Total Responses: 68,000.
Average Time per Response: 13
minutes for study participants and 13
minutes per staff person per participant.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 29,467
(= 14,733 for participants and 14,733 for
staff)
Total Burden Cost: $379,383 (=
$106,817 for participants and $272,567
for staff)
Note: Due to rounding, total burden
amounts and cost amounts may differ from
the sum of the component amounts.
For the site visits:
Frequency: Once for participants;
twice for staff.
Total Responses: 240 responses for
participants and 2,160 responses for
staff (= twice per staff for 1,080 staff).
Average Time per Response: 60
minutes for participants and 60 minutes
per staff for each response.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 2,400
(= 240 for participants and 2,160 for
staff).
Total Burden Cost: $41,700 (= $1,740
for participants and $39,960 for staff).
Note: Due to rounding, the numbers for the
totals may differ from the sum of the
component numbers.
Frequency of
collection
Average time
per response
(minutes)
Once ...........
13 minutes .....
Sfmt 4703
69127
E:\FR\FM\10NON1.SGM
Burden (hours)
10NON1
14,733
Burden cost
106,817
69128
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 217 / Wednesday, November 10, 2010 / Notices
Total
respondents
Respondents
Frequency of
collection
Average time
per response
(minutes)
Burden (hours)
Burden cost
Staff .................................................................................
270
Once ...........
13 minutes per
customer,
with an average of 252
customers
per respondent.
14,733
272,567
Total for intake .........................................................
Site Visits:
Study Participants ...........................................................
Staff .................................................................................
68,270
.....................
........................
29,467
379,383
240
1,080
Once ...........
Twice ...........
60 minutes .....
60 minutes .....
240
2,160
1,740
39,960
Total for site visits ...................................................
1,320
.....................
........................
2,400
$41,700
Total for Intake and Site Visits .........................
69,590
.....................
........................
31,867
$421,083
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Note: Due to rounding, the numbers for the totals may differ from the sum of the component numbers.
The total burden cost for the
enrollment forms represents 13 minutes,
on average, for participant respondents
to complete the study enrollment forms
multiplied by the number of
respondents (68,000) and by an
estimated average hourly wage of $7.25
per hour, which is the current Federal
minimum wage. Thus, the total
participant burden for the completion of
the enrollment forms is $106,817 (=
68,000 × 13/60 × 7.25). The projected
burden for enrollment forms represents
13 minutes, on average, for each staff
person to process documents for each
study participant, including reviewing
the participant’s information,
completing the counselor-only section,
and data-entering the necessary
information. (Each of an estimated 270
staff members will complete the forms
for an average of 252 participants.) The
total staff burden cost is $272,567,
which is 13 minutes per participant
multiplied by the number of
respondents (68,000) and an average
hourly wage of $18.50 per hour for staff
(The hourly wage of $18.50 per hour for
staff is the average wage in the range of
wages found in ‘‘Managing Customers’
Training Choices: Findings from the
Individual Training Account
Experiment,’’ a report prepared for the
U.S. Department of Labor, Employment
and Training Administration (December
2006), McConnell, Sheena, Elizabeth
Stuart, Kenneth Fortson and others.).
The total burden cost for the enrollment
forms is $379,383, which is the sum of
the burden costs for participants and
staff.
The burden cost for site visits is 2,400
hours. The site visits will involve
interviews with an average of four study
participants during each of two visits to
each of 30 sites. Hence, about 240 (= 4
× 2 × 30) participants will be involved
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:25 Nov 09, 2010
Jkt 223001
in the interviews. Each interview will
last about one hour. Hence, assuming a
wage of $7.25 per hour, the total burden
on participants for the site visits is
estimated to be 240 hours with a total
cost of $1,740 (= 7.25 × 240). About 36
staff persons will be interviewed at each
of 30 sites. Hence, in total about 1,080
staff (= 36 × 30) will be interviewed.
These staff will be interviewed for about
one hour during each visit, for each of
two visits. Hence, the total burden on
staff for the site visits is estimated to
2,160 hours (= 1,080 × 2), representing
a burden cost of $39,960 assuming an
hourly wage for staff of $18.50 per hour.
The total burden cost for the site visits
is $41,700, which is the sum of the
burden costs for participants and staff.
The total burden is estimated to be
31,867 hours ($421,083 in burden cost),
which is the sum of the burdens (and
burden costs) for the enrollment forms
and site visits.
Comments submitted in response to
this request will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval; they will also become a matter
of public record.
Signed: at Washington, DC, this 29th day
of October, 2010.
Jane Oates,
Assistant Secretary, Employment and
Training Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010–28322 Filed 11–9–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Bureau of Labor Statistics
Proposed Collection, Comment
Request
ACTION:
PO 00000
Notice.
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The Department of Labor, as
part of its continuing effort to reduce
paperwork and respondent burden,
conducts a pre-clearance consultation
program to provide the general public
and Federal agencies with an
opportunity to comment on proposed
and/or continuing collections of
information in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)]. This
program helps to ensure that requested
data can be provided in the desired
format, reporting burden (time and
financial resources) is minimized,
collection instruments are clearly
understood, and the impact of collection
requirements on respondents can be
properly assessed. The Bureau of Labor
Statistics (BLS) is soliciting comments
concerning the proposed new collection
of the ‘‘Quarterly Census of Employment
and Wages Green Goods and Services
Survey.’’ A copy of the proposed
information collection request (ICR) can
be obtained by contacting the individual
listed below in the Addresses section of
this notice.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted to the office listed in the
Addresses section of this notice on or
before January 10, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Carol
Rowan, BLS Clearance Officer, Division
of Management Systems, Bureau of
Labor Statistics, Room 4080, 2
Massachusetts Avenue, NE.,
Washington, DC 20212. Written
comments also may be transmitted by
fax to 202–691–5111 (this is not a toll
free number).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Carol Rowan, BLS Clearance Officer, at
202–691–7628 (this is not a toll free
number). (See ADDRESSES section.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\10NON1.SGM
10NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 217 (Wednesday, November 10, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69126-69128]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28322]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Proposed Information Collection Request (ICR) for the Workforce
Investment Act Random Assignment Impact Evaluation of the Adult and
Dislocated Worker Program; Comment Request
AGENCY: Employment and Training Administration (ETA), Labor.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Labor (DOL or Department), as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, conducts a
preclearance consultation program to provide the general public and
Federal agencies with an opportunity to comment on proposed and/or
continuing collections of information in accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)]. This program
helps to ensure that required data can be provided in the desired
format, reporting burden (time and financial resources) is minimized,
collection instruments are clearly understood, and the impact of
collection requirements on respondents can be properly assessed.
The Department notes that a Federal agency cannot conduct or
sponsor a collection of information unless it is approved by the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) under the PRA, and displays a currently
valid OMB control number, and the public is not required to respond to
a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number. Also, notwithstanding any other provisions of law, no
person shall be subject to penalty for failing to comply with a
collection of information if the collection of information does not
display a currently valid OMB control number. See 5 CFR 1320.5(a) and
1320.6.
A copy of the proposed ICR can be obtained by contacting the office
listed below in the addressee section of this notice or by accessing:
https://www.doleta.gov/OMBCN/OMBControlNumber.cfm.
DATES: Written comments must be submitted to the office listed in the
addressee section below on or before January 10, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Eileen Pederson, U.S. Department of Labor,
Employment and Training Administration, Office of Policy Development
and Research, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Frances Perkins Bldg., Room
N-5641, Washington, DC, 20210, telephone number (202) 693-3647 (this is
not a toll-free number). Her e-mail address is Pederson.eileen@dol.gov
and fax number is (202) 693-2766 (this is not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In 1998, Congress significantly reformed the public workforce
investment system by replacing the Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA)
with the Workforce Investment Act (WIA). Key WIA reforms included
consolidating the fragmented system of employment and training programs
under JTPA and providing universal access to basic (core) services. To
determine whether the adult and dislocated worker services funded by
Title I of the WIA are effective, ETA is undertaking the WIA Random
Assignment Impact Evaluation of the Adult and Dislocated Worker
Programs. ETA has contracted with Mathematica Policy Research and its
subcontractors --Social Policy Research Associates, MDRC, and the
Corporation for a Skilled Workforce--to conduct this evaluation.
The evaluation will address the following research questions:
Does access to WIA intensive and training services--both
individually and combined--lead adults and dislocated workers to
achieve better educational, employment, earnings, and self-sufficiency
outcomes than they would achieve in the absence of access to those
services?
Does the effectiveness of WIA vary by population subgroup?
Is there variation by sex, age, race/ethnicity, unemployment insurance
(UI) receipt, education level, previous employment history, adult and
dislocated worker status, and veteran and disability status?
How does the implementation of WIA vary by Local Workforce
Investment Area (LWIA)? Does the effectiveness of WIA vary by how it is
implemented? To what extent do implementation differences explain
variations in WIA's effectiveness?
Do the benefits from WIA services exceed program costs? Do
the benefits of intensive services exceed their costs? Do the benefits
of training exceed its costs? Do the benefits exceed the costs for
adults? Do they for dislocated workers?
[[Page 69127]]
To obtain rigorous, nationally representative estimates of WIA's
effectiveness, the evaluation will take place in 30 randomly selected
LWIAs. WIA applicants who are eligible for intensive services will be
randomly assigned to one of three groups. The three research groups to
which they will be assigned are: (1) The full-WIA group--adults and
dislocated workers in this group can receive any WIA services for which
they are eligible, (2) the core-and-intensive group--adults and
dislocated workers in this group can receive any WIA services for which
they are eligible other than training, and (3) the core-only group--
adults and dislocated workers in this group can receive only WIA core
services but no intensive or training services. Applicants who do not
consent to participate in the study will be allowed to receive core
services only. The sample intake period will be about 18 months at each
site. A total of about 68,000 WIA adult and dislocated worker
applicants will be randomly assigned to the evaluation. Data for the
study will be collected from the following five major sources:
1. Study Enrollment Forms. Three forms will be used at
intake to enroll participants into the study, a consent form, a
baseline information form (BIF), and a contact information form (CIF).
WIA adult and dislocated worker applicants will be asked to sign a
consent form to confirm that they have been informed about the study
and agree to participate. During the study enrollment process and after
agreeing to participate in the study, information on each participant's
basic demographic and socio-economic characteristics will be collected
on a short BIF. In addition, contact information will be collected on
the CIF.
2. Two Follow-Up Surveys. Follow-up telephone surveys will
be conducted with 6,000 study participants. These will be conducted at
about 15 and 30 months after random assignment. The first survey will
collect baseline data that will not have changed since random
assignment, such as place of birth. Both surveys will collect data on
study participants' receipt of services and outcomes on attainment of
education credentials, labor market outcomes, and family self-
sufficiency.
3. WIA Service and Cost Data. To ensure that random
assignment is being implemented correctly, as well as to collect data
on the receipt of WIA services, data extracts from the State and/or
local management information systems will be requested. If data on all
services are not regularly collected in a site's specific management
information system, then Mathematica will negotiate with that site to
determine the best way to obtain basic service data, whether it is from
another system, from modifications to their system, or from staff
recording service provision in a study-specific system. Data on LWIA
expenditures during the study period will be collected through
quarterly reports that the LWIAs routinely submit to ETA. In addition,
data on the costs of each service (for example, staff time and cost,
cost of materials, overhead) will be collected through cost collection
forms and interviews with program staff during the second site visit.
4. Administrative Data from Other Agencies and Programs.
Both baseline (such as past earnings) and outcome data on quarterly
earnings and UI benefits will be collected from records of state UI
agencies. Data on service and benefit receipt may also be collected
from the Employment Service, Social Security Administration, Temporary
Assistance for Needy Families Program, and/or the Supplemental
Nutrition Assistance Program.
5. Site Visits. Data on the context for the program and
its implementation will be collected during two rounds of site visits
to each of the 30 sites. The site visits will involve interviews with
key staff, group interviews with study participants, observations of
program activities, and case file reviews.
II. Desired Focus of Comments
Currently, the Department is soliciting comments concerning the
above data collection for the WIA Random Assignment Impact Evaluation.
Comments are requested to:
Evaluate whether the proposed ICR is necessary for the
proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether
the information will have practical utility;
Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the
burden of the proposed ICR, including the validity of the methodology
and assumptions used;
Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the ICR; and
Minimize the burden of the ICR on those who are to
respond, including the use of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms
of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submissions of
responses.
III. Current Actions
At this time, ETA is requesting clearance for the three study
enrollment forms (the consent form, the BIF, and the CIF) and the
protocols for the site visits. A future request will be submitted for
the follow-up surveys and the cost collection forms.
Type of review: New ICR.
OMB Number:
Affected Public: WIA Customers and Staff at 30 One-Stop Career
Centers
Cite/Reference/Form/etc.: Workforce Investment Act Section 172.
For the study enrollment forms:
Frequency: One-time collection.
Total Responses: 68,000.
Average Time per Response: 13 minutes for study participants and 13
minutes per staff person per participant.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 29,467 (= 14,733 for participants and
14,733 for staff)
Total Burden Cost: $379,383 (= $106,817 for participants and
$272,567 for staff)
Note: Due to rounding, total burden amounts and cost amounts
may differ from the sum of the component amounts.
For the site visits:
Frequency: Once for participants; twice for staff.
Total Responses: 240 responses for participants and 2,160 responses
for staff (= twice per staff for 1,080 staff).
Average Time per Response: 60 minutes for participants and 60
minutes per staff for each response.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 2,400 (= 240 for participants and
2,160 for staff).
Total Burden Cost: $41,700 (= $1,740 for participants and $39,960
for staff).
Note: Due to rounding, the numbers for the totals may differ
from the sum of the component numbers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average time
Respondents Total Frequency of per response Burden (hours) Burden cost
respondents collection (minutes)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Intake forms:
Study Participants....... 68,000 Once............ 13 minutes..... 14,733 106,817
[[Page 69128]]
Staff.................... 270 Once............ 13 minutes per 14,733 272,567
customer, with
an average of
252 customers
per respondent.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total for intake..... 68,270 ................ ............... 29,467 379,383
Site Visits:
Study Participants....... 240 Once............ 60 minutes..... 240 1,740
Staff.................... 1,080 Twice........... 60 minutes..... 2,160 39,960
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total for site visits 1,320 ................ ............... 2,400 $41,700
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total for Intake 69,590 ................ ............... 31,867 $421,083
and Site Visits.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Due to rounding, the numbers for the totals may differ from the sum of the component numbers.
The total burden cost for the enrollment forms represents 13
minutes, on average, for participant respondents to complete the study
enrollment forms multiplied by the number of respondents (68,000) and
by an estimated average hourly wage of $7.25 per hour, which is the
current Federal minimum wage. Thus, the total participant burden for
the completion of the enrollment forms is $106,817 (= 68,000 x 13/60 x
7.25). The projected burden for enrollment forms represents 13 minutes,
on average, for each staff person to process documents for each study
participant, including reviewing the participant's information,
completing the counselor-only section, and data-entering the necessary
information. (Each of an estimated 270 staff members will complete the
forms for an average of 252 participants.) The total staff burden cost
is $272,567, which is 13 minutes per participant multiplied by the
number of respondents (68,000) and an average hourly wage of $18.50 per
hour for staff (The hourly wage of $18.50 per hour for staff is the
average wage in the range of wages found in ``Managing Customers'
Training Choices: Findings from the Individual Training Account
Experiment,'' a report prepared for the U.S. Department of Labor,
Employment and Training Administration (December 2006), McConnell,
Sheena, Elizabeth Stuart, Kenneth Fortson and others.). The total
burden cost for the enrollment forms is $379,383, which is the sum of
the burden costs for participants and staff.
The burden cost for site visits is 2,400 hours. The site visits
will involve interviews with an average of four study participants
during each of two visits to each of 30 sites. Hence, about 240 (= 4 x
2 x 30) participants will be involved in the interviews. Each interview
will last about one hour. Hence, assuming a wage of $7.25 per hour, the
total burden on participants for the site visits is estimated to be 240
hours with a total cost of $1,740 (= 7.25 x 240). About 36 staff
persons will be interviewed at each of 30 sites. Hence, in total about
1,080 staff (= 36 x 30) will be interviewed. These staff will be
interviewed for about one hour during each visit, for each of two
visits. Hence, the total burden on staff for the site visits is
estimated to 2,160 hours (= 1,080 x 2), representing a burden cost of
$39,960 assuming an hourly wage for staff of $18.50 per hour. The total
burden cost for the site visits is $41,700, which is the sum of the
burden costs for participants and staff. The total burden is estimated
to be 31,867 hours ($421,083 in burden cost), which is the sum of the
burdens (and burden costs) for the enrollment forms and site visits.
Comments submitted in response to this request will be summarized
and/or included in the request for OMB approval; they will also become
a matter of public record.
Signed: at Washington, DC, this 29th day of October, 2010.
Jane Oates,
Assistant Secretary, Employment and Training Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-28322 Filed 11-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P