Compass Group USA, Inc., Canteen, Webster City, Iowa; Notice of Negative Determination on Reconsideration, 67775 [2010-27760]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 212 / Wednesday, November 3, 2010 / Notices
67775
APPENDIX—Continued
[TAA petitions instituted between 10/12/10 and 10/15/10]
Date of
institution
Date of
petition
TA–W
Subject firm (petitioners)
Location
74720 ................
Environ Biocomposites Manufacturing, LLC (State/OneStop).
Dillard’s, Inc. (State/One-Stop) .............................................
Allied Marketing Group (Company) ......................................
Mankato, MN .........................
10/14/10
10/11/10
Little Rock, AR ......................
Dallas, TX .............................
10/14/10
10/14/10
10/12/10
10/08/10
74721 ................
74722 ................
[FR Doc. 2010–27755 Filed 11–2–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–73,503]
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Compass Group USA, Inc., Canteen,
Webster City, Iowa; Notice of Negative
Determination on Reconsideration
On September 21, 2010, the
Department of Labor issued an
Affirmative Determination Regarding
Application for Reconsideration for the
workers and former workers of the
subject firm. The notice was published
in the Federal Register on September
29, 2010 (75 FR 60139).
The initial investigation resulted in a
negative determination based on the
finding that the subject firm did not,
during the investigation period, shift to
a foreign country services like or
directly competitive with the cafeteria
services or vending machine services
supplied by the workers or acquire from
a foreign country services like or
directly competitive with the cafeteria
services or vending machine services
supplied by the workers; that the
workers’ separation, or threat of
separation, was not related to any
increase in imports of like or directly
competitive food services or a shift in
service/acquisition of such food services
abroad; and that the workers did not
supply a service that was directly used
in the production of an article or the
supply of service by a firm that
employed a worker group that is eligible
to apply for TAA based on the aforementioned article or service.
In the request for reconsideration, the
petitioner stated that the workers of the
subject firm were service workers who
provided food services to employees of
Electrolux Home Products, Inc.,
Electrolux Major Appliances Division,
Webster City, Iowa, who have been
certified eligible for Trade Adjustment
Assistance (TA–W–70,123, signed June
25, 2009). The petitioner went on to
assert that the situation of the Compass
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:21 Nov 02, 2010
Jkt 223001
Group workers was the same as that of
employees of Premier Manufacturing
Support Services, a services provider to
General Motors, Spring Hill, Tennessee,
who were certified eligible to apply for
TAA on March 12, 2010 (TA–W–
72,379).
The difference in the outcome of the
two cases results from the difference in
the companies’ relationships to the
production processes at the respective
Electrolux and General Motors plants.
The workers of Premier Manufacturing
Support Services provided services
(janitorial, maintenance, and hazardous
waste disposal) that were directly
involved in the production process at
General Motors, Spring Hill, Tennessee.
In contrast, the workers of the subject
firm provided services (cafeteria
services and vending machine services)
that are not directly involved in the
production process at Electrolux Home
Products, Inc., Electrolux Major
Appliances Division, Webster City,
Iowa.
During the course of the
reconsideration investigation this office
inquired into the relationship between
Electrolux and the subject firm. It was
determined that Electrolux exercised no
day-to-day operational control over the
employees of the subject firm.
Consequently, the workers cannot be
considered employees of Electrolux, but
only of the subject firm, Compass Group
USA.
Furthermore, it should be noted that
employees of American Food and
Vending, Spring Hill, Tennessee, who
provided food services to employees at
that same General Motors plant in
Spring Hill, Tennessee, were denied
TAA certification (TA–W–72,606,
signed March 19, 2010).
In the request for reconsideration, the
petitioner also asserted that the decision
in the subject case is ‘‘contrary to the
intent of the U.S. Congress in light of
the changes [regarding service
providers] it made to trade adjustment
assistance by passage of the Trade
Globalization Adjustment Assistance
Act of 2009’’ and that in making those
changes ‘‘one can only conclude that the
U.S. Congress intended a broad
interpretation’’ of the phrase ‘‘service
PO 00000
Frm 00094
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
used in the production of articles or in
the supply of service, * * *.’’
This office does not find that
argument compelling and is not
prepared to certify the workers in this
case on the basis of the broad reading of
the law given by the petitioner.
The petitioner did not supply facts
not previously considered; nor provide
additional documentation indicating
that there was either (1) a mistake in the
determination of facts not previously
considered or (2) a misinterpretation of
facts or of the law justifying
reconsideration of the initial
determination.
After careful review of the request for
reconsideration, the Department
determines that 29 CFR 90.18(c) has not
been met.
Conclusion
After reconsideration, I affirm the
original notice of negative
determination of eligibility to apply for
worker adjustment assistance for
workers and former workers of Compass
Group USA, Inc., Canteen, Webster City,
Iowa.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 22nd day
of October 2010.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010–27760 Filed 11–2–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–74,116]
Washington Department of
Transportation, Olympic Division,
Aberdeen Maintenance Office,
Chehalis Drawbridge Tenders,
Aberdeen, WA; Notice of Negative
Determination Regarding Application
for Reconsideration
By application dated July 9, 2010, the
Washington State Labor Council, AFL–
CIO, requested administrative
reconsideration of the negative
determination regarding workers’
E:\FR\FM\03NON1.SGM
03NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 212 (Wednesday, November 3, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 67775]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27760]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-73,503]
Compass Group USA, Inc., Canteen, Webster City, Iowa; Notice of
Negative Determination on Reconsideration
On September 21, 2010, the Department of Labor issued an
Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration for
the workers and former workers of the subject firm. The notice was
published in the Federal Register on September 29, 2010 (75 FR 60139).
The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination
based on the finding that the subject firm did not, during the
investigation period, shift to a foreign country services like or
directly competitive with the cafeteria services or vending machine
services supplied by the workers or acquire from a foreign country
services like or directly competitive with the cafeteria services or
vending machine services supplied by the workers; that the workers'
separation, or threat of separation, was not related to any increase in
imports of like or directly competitive food services or a shift in
service/acquisition of such food services abroad; and that the workers
did not supply a service that was directly used in the production of an
article or the supply of service by a firm that employed a worker group
that is eligible to apply for TAA based on the afore-mentioned article
or service.
In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner stated that the
workers of the subject firm were service workers who provided food
services to employees of Electrolux Home Products, Inc., Electrolux
Major Appliances Division, Webster City, Iowa, who have been certified
eligible for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TA-W-70,123, signed June 25,
2009). The petitioner went on to assert that the situation of the
Compass Group workers was the same as that of employees of Premier
Manufacturing Support Services, a services provider to General Motors,
Spring Hill, Tennessee, who were certified eligible to apply for TAA on
March 12, 2010 (TA-W-72,379).
The difference in the outcome of the two cases results from the
difference in the companies' relationships to the production processes
at the respective Electrolux and General Motors plants. The workers of
Premier Manufacturing Support Services provided services (janitorial,
maintenance, and hazardous waste disposal) that were directly involved
in the production process at General Motors, Spring Hill, Tennessee. In
contrast, the workers of the subject firm provided services (cafeteria
services and vending machine services) that are not directly involved
in the production process at Electrolux Home Products, Inc., Electrolux
Major Appliances Division, Webster City, Iowa.
During the course of the reconsideration investigation this office
inquired into the relationship between Electrolux and the subject firm.
It was determined that Electrolux exercised no day-to-day operational
control over the employees of the subject firm. Consequently, the
workers cannot be considered employees of Electrolux, but only of the
subject firm, Compass Group USA.
Furthermore, it should be noted that employees of American Food and
Vending, Spring Hill, Tennessee, who provided food services to
employees at that same General Motors plant in Spring Hill, Tennessee,
were denied TAA certification (TA-W-72,606, signed March 19, 2010).
In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner also asserted
that the decision in the subject case is ``contrary to the intent of
the U.S. Congress in light of the changes [regarding service providers]
it made to trade adjustment assistance by passage of the Trade
Globalization Adjustment Assistance Act of 2009'' and that in making
those changes ``one can only conclude that the U.S. Congress intended a
broad interpretation'' of the phrase ``service used in the production
of articles or in the supply of service, * * *.''
This office does not find that argument compelling and is not
prepared to certify the workers in this case on the basis of the broad
reading of the law given by the petitioner.
The petitioner did not supply facts not previously considered; nor
provide additional documentation indicating that there was either (1) a
mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered or (2)
a misinterpretation of facts or of the law justifying reconsideration
of the initial determination.
After careful review of the request for reconsideration, the
Department determines that 29 CFR 90.18(c) has not been met.
Conclusion
After reconsideration, I affirm the original notice of negative
determination of eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance
for workers and former workers of Compass Group USA, Inc., Canteen,
Webster City, Iowa.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 22nd day of October 2010.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-27760 Filed 11-2-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P