Sojitz Corporation of America, a Subsidiary of Sojitz Corporation, Forest Products Department, Seattle, WA; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration, 66794 [2010-27388]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
66794
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 209 / Friday, October 29, 2010 / Notices
0172. The OMB is particularly
interested in comments that:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Agency: Occupational Safety and
Health Administration (OSHA).
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Title of Collection: Student Data
Form.
Form Number: OSHA Form 182.
OMB Control Number: 1218–0172.
Affected Public: Individuals; business
or other for-profit organizations; Federal
government; State, Local, or Tribal
governments.
Total Estimated Number of
Respondents: 2000.
Total Estimated Number of
Responses: 2000.
Total Estimated Annual Burden
Hours: 160.
Total Estimated Annual Costs Burden:
$0.
Dated: October 14, 2010.
Michel Smyth,
Departmental Clearance Officer.
Conclusion
[FR Doc. 2010–27378 Filed 10–28–10; 8:45 am]
After careful review of the
application, I conclude that the claim is
of sufficient weight to justify
reconsideration of the U.S. Department
of Labor’s prior decision. The
application is, therefore, granted.
BILLING CODE 4510–26–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–73,722]
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
reconsideration of the negative
determination regarding workers’
eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment
Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers
and former workers of Sojitz
Corporation of America, a subsidiary of
Sojitz Corporation, Forest Products
Department, Seattle, Washington
(subject firm). The determination was
issued on September 1, 2010. The
Department’s Notice of Determination
was published in the Federal Register
on September 21, 2010 (75 FR 57517).
The workers provide services related to
the trade of forest products.
The negative determination was based
on the findings that the subject firm did
not, during the period under
investigation, shift to a foreign country
the supply of services like or directly
competitive with the services performed
by the workers or acquire these services
from a foreign country; that the workers’
separation, or threat of separation, was
not related to any increase in imports of
like or directly competitive services;
and that the workers did not produce an
article or supply a service that was
directly used in the production of an
article or the supply of service by a firm
that employed a worker group that is
eligible to apply for TAA based on the
aforementioned article or service.
In the request for reconsideration, the
petitioners alleged that the subject firm
has shifted services to a foreign country.
The Department has carefully
reviewed the request for reconsideration
and the existing record, and has
determined that the Department will
conduct further investigation to
determine if the petitioning workers
meet the eligibility requirements of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended.
Sojitz Corporation of America, a
Subsidiary of Sojitz Corporation,
Forest Products Department, Seattle,
WA; Notice of Affirmative
Determination Regarding Application
for Reconsideration
Signed at Washington, DC, this 18th day of
October 2010.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010–27388 Filed 10–28–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
By application dated September 23,
2010, by a Washington State workforce
official requested administrative
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:23 Oct 28, 2010
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–71,572; TA–W–71,572A; TA–W–
71,572B; TA–W–71,572C]
Notice of Affirmative Determination
Regarding Application for
Reconsideration: TA–W–71,572,
Severstal Wheeling, Inc., a Subsidiary
of Severstal North America, Inc.,
Martins Ferry, OH; TA–W–71,572A,
Severstal Wheeling, Inc., a Subsidiary
of Severstal North America, Inc.,
Yorkville, OH; TA–W–71,572B,
Severstal Wheeling, Inc., a Subsidiary
of Severstal North America, Inc., Mingo
Junction, OH; TA–W–71,572C,
Severstal Wheeling, Inc., a Subsidiary
of Severstal North America, Inc.,
Steubenville, OH
By applications dated May 15 and
May 21, 2010, United Steel, Paper and
Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing,
Energy, Allied Industrial and Service
Workers International Union (USW),
requested administrative
reconsideration of the negative
determination regarding workers’
eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment
Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers
and former workers of the subject firm.
The determination was issued on March
3, 2010, and the Notice of determination
was published in the Federal Register
on April 23, 2010 (75 FR 21363).
The subject workers produce
galvanized coil (TA–W–71,572), cold
rolled coils and back plate coils (TA–
W–71,572A), hot rolled coils (TA–W–
71,572B), and cold rolled coils (TA–W–
71,572C).
The negative determination was based
on the findings that there was no
increase in imports of like or directly
competitive articles produced at subject
facilities and no shift to/acquisition
from a foreign country by the subject
firm of like or directly competitive
articles produced at the subject
facilities.
The investigation also revealed that
the firm did not produce an article or
supply a service that was used by a firm
with TAA-certified workers in the
production of an article or supply of a
service that was the basis for TAA
certification.
The Department of Labor has carefully
reviewed the request for reconsideration
and the existing record, and has
determined that the Department will
conduct further investigation to
determine if the workers meet the
eligibility requirements of the Trade Act
of 1974.
E:\FR\FM\29OCN1.SGM
29OCN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 209 (Friday, October 29, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 66794]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27388]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-73,722]
Sojitz Corporation of America, a Subsidiary of Sojitz
Corporation, Forest Products Department, Seattle, WA; Notice of
Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration
By application dated September 23, 2010, by a Washington State
workforce official requested administrative reconsideration of the
negative determination regarding workers' eligibility to apply for
Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers and former
workers of Sojitz Corporation of America, a subsidiary of Sojitz
Corporation, Forest Products Department, Seattle, Washington (subject
firm). The determination was issued on September 1, 2010. The
Department's Notice of Determination was published in the Federal
Register on September 21, 2010 (75 FR 57517). The workers provide
services related to the trade of forest products.
The negative determination was based on the findings that the
subject firm did not, during the period under investigation, shift to a
foreign country the supply of services like or directly competitive
with the services performed by the workers or acquire these services
from a foreign country; that the workers' separation, or threat of
separation, was not related to any increase in imports of like or
directly competitive services; and that the workers did not produce an
article or supply a service that was directly used in the production of
an article or the supply of service by a firm that employed a worker
group that is eligible to apply for TAA based on the aforementioned
article or service.
In the request for reconsideration, the petitioners alleged that
the subject firm has shifted services to a foreign country.
The Department has carefully reviewed the request for
reconsideration and the existing record, and has determined that the
Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the
petitioning workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act
of 1974, as amended.
Conclusion
After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S.
Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore,
granted.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 18th day of October 2010.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-27388 Filed 10-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
