Enesco, LLC, Gund Division, Distribution Center, Edison, NJ; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration, 66795 [2010-27385]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 209 / Friday, October 29, 2010 / Notices
Conclusion
After careful review of the
application, I conclude that the claim is
of sufficient weight to justify
reconsideration of the U.S. Department
of Labor’s prior decision. The
application is, therefore, granted.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 15th day of
October 2010.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010–27381 Filed 10–28–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
Employment and Training
Administration
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
International Paper, Pineville Mill,
Industrial Packaging Group, Pineville,
LA; Notice of Affirmative
Determination Regarding Application
for Reconsideration
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
After careful review of the
application, I conclude that the claim is
of sufficient weight to justify
reconsideration of the U.S. Department
of Labor’s prior decision. The
application is, therefore, granted.
[FR Doc. 2010–27383 Filed 10–28–10; 8:45 am]
[TA–W–72,729]
By application dated November 2,
2009, the company official from the
subject firm requested administrative
reconsideration of the negative
determination regarding workers’
eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment
Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers
and former workers of the subject firm.
The determination was issued on
August 20, 2010 and the Notice of
Determination was published in the
Federal Register on September 3, 2010
(75 FR 54187).
The initial investigation resulted in a
negative determination based on the
findings that neither the subject firm nor
any of its customers imported articles
like or directly competitive with
uncoated freesheet containerboard
produced by the subject firm nor did the
subject firm shift production to a foreign
country or acquire from another country
articles like or directly competitive with
the uncoated freesheet containerboard
produced at the subject firm. The initial
investigation also revealed that the
subject firm did not produce a
component part that was used by a firm
that employed a worker group that is
currently eligible to apply for TAA and
that directly incorporated the
containerboard in the production of the
article that was the basis for the TAA
certification.
In request for reconsideration, the
subject firm provided new information
in regard to the product produced by the
subject firm.
The Department of Labor has carefully
reviewed the request for reconsideration
15:23 Oct 28, 2010
Conclusion
Signed at Washington, DC, this 15th day of
October 2010.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
VerDate Mar<15>2010
and the existing record, and has
determined that the Department will
conduct further investigation to
determine if the workers meet the
eligibility requirements of the Trade Act
of 1974.
Jkt 223001
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
66795
eligible to apply for TAA based on the
aforementioned article or service.
In the request for reconsideration, the
petitioner stated that the petition was
filed on behalf of a worker who worked
within a separate department at a
separate location and that the services
performed by the aforementioned
department and location have shifted to
a foreign country.
The Department has carefully
reviewed the request for reconsideration
and the existing record, and has
determined that the Department will
conduct further investigation to
determine if the petitioning workers
meet the eligibility requirements of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended.
Conclusion
After careful review of the
application, I conclude that the claim is
of sufficient weight to justify
reconsideration of the U.S. Department
of Labor’s prior decision. The
application is, therefore, granted.
[TA–W–73,479]
Enesco, LLC, Gund Division,
Distribution Center, Edison, NJ; Notice
of Affirmative Determination Regarding
Application for Reconsideration
Signed at Washington, DC, this 18th day of
October 2010.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010–27385 Filed 10–28–10; 8:45 am]
By application dated October 5, 2010,
by an Illinois State workforce official
requested administrative
reconsideration of the negative
determination regarding workers’
eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment
Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers
and former workers of Enesco, LLC,
Gund Division, Distribution Center,
Edison, New Jersey (subject firm). The
determination was issued on August 27,
2010. The Department’s Notice of
Determination was published in the
Federal Register on September 15, 2010
(75 FR 56144). The workers are engaged
in activities related to the supply of
packaging and distribution services
related to giftware products.
The negative determination was based
on the findings that the subject firm did
not, during the period under
investigation, shift to a foreign country
the supply of services like or directly
competitive with the services performed
by the workers or acquire these services
from a foreign country; that the workers’
separation, or threat of separation, was
not related to any increase in imports of
like or directly competitive services;
and that the workers did not produce an
article or supply a service that was
directly used in the production of an
article or the supply of service by a firm
that employed a worker group that is
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–64,993]
TTM Technologies, Including On-Site
Leased Workers From Kelly Services,
Aerotek, and an On-Site Leased
Worker From Orbotech, Inc., Redmond,
WA; Amended Certification Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and
section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26
U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the
Department of Labor issued a
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance on January 23, 2008,
applicable to workers of TTM
Technologies, Redmond, Washington.
The notice was published in the Federal
Register on March 25, 2009 (74 FR
12901).
At the request of the State agency, the
Department reviewed the certification
for workers of the subject firm. The
workers are engaged in the production
of printed circuit boards.
E:\FR\FM\29OCN1.SGM
29OCN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 209 (Friday, October 29, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 66795]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27385]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-73,479]
Enesco, LLC, Gund Division, Distribution Center, Edison, NJ;
Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for
Reconsideration
By application dated October 5, 2010, by an Illinois State
workforce official requested administrative reconsideration of the
negative determination regarding workers' eligibility to apply for
Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers and former
workers of Enesco, LLC, Gund Division, Distribution Center, Edison, New
Jersey (subject firm). The determination was issued on August 27, 2010.
The Department's Notice of Determination was published in the Federal
Register on September 15, 2010 (75 FR 56144). The workers are engaged
in activities related to the supply of packaging and distribution
services related to giftware products.
The negative determination was based on the findings that the
subject firm did not, during the period under investigation, shift to a
foreign country the supply of services like or directly competitive
with the services performed by the workers or acquire these services
from a foreign country; that the workers' separation, or threat of
separation, was not related to any increase in imports of like or
directly competitive services; and that the workers did not produce an
article or supply a service that was directly used in the production of
an article or the supply of service by a firm that employed a worker
group that is eligible to apply for TAA based on the aforementioned
article or service.
In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner stated that the
petition was filed on behalf of a worker who worked within a separate
department at a separate location and that the services performed by
the aforementioned department and location have shifted to a foreign
country.
The Department has carefully reviewed the request for
reconsideration and the existing record, and has determined that the
Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the
petitioning workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act
of 1974, as amended.
Conclusion
After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S.
Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore,
granted.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 18th day of October 2010.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-27385 Filed 10-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
