Regulations Containing Procedures for Handling of Retaliation Complaints; Extension of the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) Approval of Information Collection (Paperwork) Requirements, 66391-66393 [2010-27264]
Download as PDF
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 208 / Thursday, October 28, 2010 / Notices
53. The Fiero Site (Powerhouse) Site
in Michigan;
54. The Flint Flow-through
Warehouse Site in Michigan;
55. The GMPT—Flint North #5/#10/
#81 Site in Michigan;
56. The GMVM—Pontiac Assembly
Site in Michigan;
57. The Midsize & Luxury Car Clark
Street Site in Michigan;
58. The Delta Engine Plant Site in
Michigan;
59. The 1831 Grondinwood
(residence) Site in Michigan;
60. The 1394 Oak Hollow (residence)
Site in Michigan;
61. The Pontiac Centerpoint
Campus—Central Site in Michigan;
62. The Pontiac Centerpoint
Campus—East Site in Michigan;
63. The Centerpoint Land (no Etkin
ground lease) Site in Michigan;
64. The Centerpoint Land (Etkin
ground lease) Site in Michigan;
65. The 652 Meadow Drive Site in
Michigan;
66. The 642 Meadow Drive Site in
Michigan;
67. The 631 Meadow Drive Site in
Michigan;
68. The 607 Meadow Drive Site in
Michigan;
69. The Willow Run Engineering
Center Site in Michigan;
70. The PCC Validation Southern
Parking Lot Site in Michigan;
71. The Former Leed’s Assembly
Plant—Northern Parcel Site in
Michigan;
72. The Former Leed’s Assembly
Plant—Southern Parcel Site in
Michigan;
73. The Hyatt Clark Industries Site in
Michigan;
74. The Delphi Interior & Lighting
Systems—Trenton Site in Michigan;
75. The General Motors (Central
Foundry Division) Superfund Site, a/k/
a the Massena Site, in New York;
76. The GM–IFG Syracuse Site in New
York;
77. The Ley Creek PCB Dredging Site
in New York;
78. The Tonawanda Engine Landfill
Site in New York;
79. The Delphi Harrison—Moraine
Site in Ohio;
80. The Delphi Interior—Elyria Site in
Ohio;
81. The Stamping—Mansfield Site in
Ohio;
82. The GMPT—Toledo 103C Landfill
Site in Ohio;
83. The GMPT—Parma Complex Site
in Ohio;
84. The Lordstown Excess Land Site
in Ohio;
85. The Moraine Lagoon Site in Ohio;
86. The Moraine Assembly Site in
Ohio;
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:13 Oct 27, 2010
Jkt 223001
87. The Metal Fab—Pittsburgh Site in
Pennsylvania;
88. The GMPT—Fredericksburg Site
in Virginia; and
89. The Janesville Training Center
Site in Wisconsin.
Under the Settlement Agreement, Old
GM will make a cash payment of
$499,434,945 to an Environmental
Response Trust established pursuant to
an Environmental Response Trust
Agreement to clean up these 89 sites.
Old GM will also make an additional
payment of $142,000,000 and transfer
certain personalty and title to 88 real
properties owned by Old GM to the
environmental response trust to fund
administrative expenses.
The Department of Justice will
receive, for a period of thirty days from
the date of this publication, comments
relating to the Consent Decree and
Settlement Agreement. Comments
should be addressed to the Assistant
Attorney General, Environment and
Natural Resources Division, and either
emailed to pubcommentees.enrd@usdoj.gov or mailed to P.O.
Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice,
Washington, DC 20044–7611, and
should refer to In re Motors Liquidation
Corp., et al., D.J. Ref. 90–11–3–09754.
Commenters may request an
opportunity for a public meeting in the
affected area, in accordance with
Section 7003(d) of RCRA, 42 U.S.C.
6973(d).
The Consent Decree and Settlement
Agreement and the Environmental
Response Trust Agreement may be
examined at the Office of the United
States Attorney, 86 Chambers Street, 3rd
Floor, New York, New York 10007, and
at the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Ariel Rios Building, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20460. During the
public comment period, the Settlement
Agreement and the Custodial Trust
Agreement may also be examined on the
following Department of Justice Web
site, https://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/
Consent_Decrees.html. Copies of the
Consent Decree and Settlement
Agreement and the Environmental
Response Trust Agreement may also be
obtained by mail from the Consent
Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S.
Department of Justice, Washington, DC
20044–7611 or by faxing or e-mailing a
request to Tonia Fleetwood
(tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), fax no.
(202) 514–0097, phone confirmation
number (202) 514–1547. In requesting a
copy from the Consent Decree Library,
please enclose a check in the amount of
$42.75 (with exhibits) or $22.75
(without exhibits) (25 cents per page
reproduction cost) payable to the U.S.
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
66391
Treasury or, if by e-mail or fax, please
forward a check in that amount to the
Consent Decree Library at the stated
address.
Maureen Katz,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental
Enforcement Section, Environment and
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2010–27265 Filed 10–27–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration
[Docket No. OSHA–2010–0049]
Regulations Containing Procedures for
Handling of Retaliation Complaints;
Extension of the Office of Management
and Budget’s (OMB) Approval of
Information Collection (Paperwork)
Requirements
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Request for public comments.
AGENCY:
OSHA solicits comments
concerning its proposal to extend OMB
approval of the information collection
requirements for handling of retaliation
complaints filed under various
whistleblower protection statutes
contained in regulations at: 29 CFR part
24, Procedures for the Handling of
Retaliation Complaints under Federal
Employee Protection Statutes; 29 CFR
part 1977, Discrimination Against
Employees Exercising Rights under the
Williams-Steiger Occupational Safety
and Health Act; 29 CFR part 1978,
Procedures for the Handling of
Retaliation Complaints under the
Employee Protection Provision of the
Surface Transportation Assistance Act
of 1982; 29 CFR part 1979, Procedures
for Handling Discrimination Complaints
Under Section 519 of the Wendell H.
Ford Aviation Investment and Reform
Act for the 21st Century; 29 CFR part
1980, Procedures for Handling of
Discrimination Complaints Under
Section 806 of the Corporate and
Criminal Fraud Accountability Act of
2002, Title VIII of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act 2002; 29 CFR part 1981, Procedures
for the Handling of Discrimination
Complaints under Section 6 of the
Pipeline Safety and Improvement Act of
2002; 29 CFR part 1982, Procedures for
the Handling of Retaliation Complaints
Under the National Transit Systems
Security Act of 2007, Enacted as Section
1413 of the Implementing
Recommendations of the 9/11
Commission Act of 2007, and the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\28OCN1.SGM
28OCN1
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
66392
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 208 / Thursday, October 28, 2010 / Notices
Federal Railroad Safety Act, as
Amended by Section 1521 of the
Implementing Recommendations of the
9/11 Commission Act of 2007; and 29
CFR part 1983, Procedures for the
Handling of Retaliation Complaints
Under Section 219 of the Consumer
Product Safety Improvement Act of
2008. These regulations set forth
procedures employees must use to file
a complaint with OSHA alleging that
their employer violated a whistleblower
protection provision contained in
certain statutes that prohibit retaliatory
action by employers against employees
who engage in activities protected by
the statutes.
DATES: Comments must be submitted
(postmarked, sent, or received) by
December 27, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Electronically: You may
submit comments and attachments
electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov, which is the
Federal eRulemaking Portal. Follow the
instructions online for submitting
comments.
Facsimile: If your comments,
including attachments, are not longer
than 10 pages, you may fax them to the
OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693–1648.
Mail, hand delivery, express mail, and
messenger or courier service: You must
submit your comments and attachments
to the OSHA Docket Office, OSHA
Docket No. OSHA–2010–0049, U.S.
Department of Labor, Occupational
Safety and Health Administration,
Room N–2625, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210.
Deliveries (hand, express mail, and
messenger or courier service) are
accepted during the Department of
Labor’s and Docket Office’s normal
business hours, 8:15 a.m. to 4:45 p.m.,
e.t.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the Agency name and OSHA
docket number for the Information
Collection Request (ICR) (OSHA–2010–
0049). All comments, including any
personal information you provide, are
placed in the public docket without
change, and will be made available
online at https://www.regulations.gov.
For further information on submitting
comments see the ‘‘Public Participation’’
heading in the section of this notice
titled SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
Docket: To read or download
comments or other material in the
docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov
or the OSHA Docket Office at the
address above. All documents in the
docket (including this Federal Register
notice) are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index; however,
some information (e.g., copyrighted
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:13 Oct 27, 2010
Jkt 223001
material) is not publicly available to
read or download through the Web site.
All submissions, including copyrighted
material, are available for inspection
and copying at the OSHA Docket Office.
You may obtain a copy of the ICR by
contacting Theda Kenney or Todd
Owen, Directorate of Standards and
Guidance, OSHA, U.S. Department of
Labor, Room N–3609, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210;
telephone: (202) 693–2222.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nilgun Tolek, Office of the
Whistleblower Protection Program,
Directorate of Enforcement Programs,
OSHA, U.S. Department of Labor, Room
N–3610, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20210; telephone: (202)
693–2199.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Department of Labor, as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
and respondent (e.g., an employee filing
a retaliation complaint) burden,
conducts a preclearance consultation
program to provide the public with an
opportunity to comment on proposed
and continuing information collection
requirements in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This program
ensures that information is in the
desired format, reporting burden (time
and costs) is minimal, collection
instruments are clearly understood, and
OSHA’s estimate of the information
collection burden is accurate.
The Agency is responsible for
investigating alleged violations of
‘‘whistleblower’’ provisions contained in
a number of statutes. These
whistleblower provisions prohibit
retaliation by employers against
employees who report alleged violations
of certain laws or regulations.
Accordingly, these provisions prohibit
an employer from discharging or taking
any other retaliatory action against an
employee because the employee engages
in any of the protected activities
specified by the whistleblower
provisions of the statutes.
These statutes are covered under the
following regulations: 29 CFR part 24,
Procedures for the Handling of
Retaliation Complaints under Federal
Employee Protection Statutes (29 CFR
part 24 covers: Safe Water Drinking Act,
42 U.S.C. 300j–9(i); Federal Water
Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. 1367;
Toxic Substances Control Act, 15 U.S.C.
2622; Solid Waste Disposal Act, 42
U.S.C. 6971; Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C.
7622; Energy Reorganization Act of
1974, 42 U.S.C. 5851; and the
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability
Act, 42 U.S.C. 9610); 29 CFR part 1977,
Discrimination Against Employees
Exercising Rights under the WilliamsSteiger Occupational Safety and Health
Act (29 CFR part 1977 covers: the
Occupational Safety and Health Act, 29
U.S.C. 660; the Asbestos Hazard
Emergency Response Act, 15 U.S.C.
2651; and the International Safe
Container Act, 46 U.S.C. 80507); 29 CFR
part 1978, Procedures for the Handling
of Retaliation Complaints under the
Employee Protection Provision of the
Surface Transportation Assistance Act
of 1982; 29 CFR part 1979, Procedures
for Handling Discrimination Complaints
Under the Wendell H. Ford Aviation
Investment and Reform Act for the 21st
Century; 29 CFR part 1980, Procedures
for Handling of Discrimination
Complaints Under Section 806 of the
Corporate and Criminal Fraud
Accountability Act of 2002, Title VIII of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002; 29 CFR
part 1981, Procedures for the Handling
of Discrimination Complaints under
Section 6 of the Pipeline Safety and
Improvement Act of 2002; 29 CFR part
1982, Procedures for the Handling of
Retaliation Complaints Under the
National Transit Systems Security Act
of 2007, Enacted as Section 1413 of the
Implementing Recommendations of the
9/11 Commission Act of 2007, and the
Federal Railroad Safety Act, as
Amended by Section 1521 of the
Implementing Recommendations of the
9/11 Commission Act of 2007; and 29
CFR part 1983, Procedures for the
Handling of Retaliation Complaints
Under Section 219 of the Consumer
Product Safety Improvement Act of
2008. Information collection
requirements contained in future
regulations promulgated by the Agency
with respect to a whistleblower
provision of any other Federal law,
except those that are assigned to another
DOL agency, will be added to this
information collection.
These regulations specify the
procedures that an employee must use
to file a complaint with OSHA alleging
that their employer violated a
whistleblower provision for which the
Agency has investigative responsibility.
Any employee who believes that such a
violation occurred may file a complaint,
or have the complaint filed on their
behalf. Four of these regulations, 29 CFR
parts 24, 1979, 1980 and 1981, require
that complaints must be filed in writing,
and should include a full statement of
the acts and omissions, with pertinent
dates, that are believed to constitute the
violation. The other regulations, 29 CFR
E:\FR\FM\28OCN1.SGM
28OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 208 / Thursday, October 28, 2010 / Notices
parts 1977, 1978, 1982, and 1983,
require no particular form of filing for
complaints.
II. Special Issues for Comment
OSHA has a particular interest in
comments on the following issues:
• Whether the proposed information
collection requirements are necessary
for the proper performance of the
Agency’s functions, including whether
the information is useful;
• The accuracy of OSHA’s estimate of
the burden (time and costs) of the
information collection requirements,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• The quality, utility, and clarity of
the information collected; and
• Ways to minimize the burden on
individuals who must comply; for
example, by using automated or other
technological information collection
and transmission techniques.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
III. Proposed Actions
OSHA is requesting that OMB extend
its approval of the information
collection requirements contained in the
regulations containing procedures for
handling retaliation complaints at 29
CFR parts 24, 1978, 1979, 1980, 1981,
1982, and 1983.1 OSHA is proposing to
increase the burden hours in the
currently approved information
collection request from 390 burden
hours to 2,160 burden hours (a total
increase of 1,770 hours). These
information collection requirements are
included in this extension. This
increase is due to the Agency’s
determination that all of the Agency’s
regulations containing procedures for
the investigation of retaliation
complaints, regardless of the form used
to file a complaint, contain information
collection requirements associated with
the initiation of the complaint. The
increase is also due to updated
information showing an increase in the
annual number of complaints filed. The
Agency will summarize the comments
submitted in response to this notice,
and will include this summary in the
request to OMB.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Title: Regulations Containing
Procedures for Handling Retaliation
Complaints.
OMB Number: 1218–0236.
Affected Public: Individuals.
Number of Respondents: 2,160.
1 Several of these regulations use the term
‘‘discrimination’’ or ‘‘discrimination complaints’’ in
their titles. These terms are synonymous with
‘‘retaliation’’ and ‘‘retaliation complaints,’’
respectively.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:13 Oct 27, 2010
Jkt 223001
Frequency of Recordkeeping: Once
per complaint.
Average Time per Response: 1 hour.
Total Annual Hours Requested: 2,160.
Estimated Cost (Operation and
Maintenance): $0.
IV. Public Participation—Submission of
Comments on This Notice and Internet
Access to Comments and Submissions
You may submit comments in
response to this document as follows:
(1) Electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov, which is the
Federal eRulemaking Portal; (2) by
facsimile (fax); or (3) by hard copy. All
comments, attachments, and other
material must identify the Agency name
and the OSHA docket number for the
ICR (Docket No. OSHA–2010–0049).
You may supplement electronic
submissions by uploading document
files electronically. If you wish to mail
additional materials in reference to an
electronic or facsimile submission, you
must submit them to the OSHA Docket
Office (see the section of this notice
titled ADDRESSES). The additional
materials must clearly identify your
electronic comments by your name,
date, and the docket number so the
Agency can attach them to your
comments.
Because of security procedures, the
use of regular mail may cause a
significant delay in the receipt of
comments. For information about
security procedures concerning the
delivery of materials by hand, express
delivery, and messenger or courier
service, please contact the OSHA Docket
Office at (202) 693–2350, (TTY (877)
889–5627).
Comments and submissions are
posted without change at https://
www.regulations.gov. Therefore, OSHA
cautions commenters about submitting
personal information such as social
security numbers and date of birth.
Although all submissions are listed in
the https://www.regulations.gov index,
some information (e.g., copyrighted
material) is not publicly available to
read or download through this Web site.
All submissions, including copyrighted
material, are available for inspection
and copying at the OSHA Docket Office.
Information on using the https://
www.regulations.gov Web site to submit
comments and access the docket is
available at the Web site’s ‘‘User Tips’’
link. Contact the OSHA Docket Office
for information about materials not
available through the Web site, and for
assistance in using the Internet to locate
docket submissions.
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
66393
V. Authority and Signature
David Michaels, PhD, MPH, Assistant
Secretary of Labor for Occupational
Safety and Health, directed the
preparation of this notice. The authority
for this notice is the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3506
et seq.) and Secretary of Labor’s Order
No. 4–2010 (75 FR 55355).
Signed at Washington, DC, on October 25,
2010.
David Michaels,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational
Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2010–27264 Filed 10–27–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–26–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. NRC–2010–0263]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Submission for the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
Review; Comment Request
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC).
ACTION: Notice of the OMB review of
information collection and solicitation
of public comment.
AGENCY:
The NRC has recently
submitted to OMB for review the
following proposal for the collection of
information under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. Chapter 35). The NRC hereby
informs potential respondents that an
agency may not conduct or sponsor, and
that a person is not required to respond
to, a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. The NRC published a Federal
Register Notice with a 60-day comment
period on this information collection on
July 29, 2010.
1. Type of submission, new, revision,
or extension: Extension.
2. The title of the information
collection: NRC Form 5, ‘‘Occupational
Dose Record for a Monitoring Period.’’
3. Current OMB approval number:
3150–0006.
4. The form number if applicable:
NRC Form 5.
5. How often the collection is
required: Annually.
6. Who will be required or asked to
report: NRC licensees who are required
to comply with 10 CFR part 20.
7. An estimate of the number of
annual responses: 4,042 (194 reporting
responses plus 3,848 recordkeepers).
8. The estimated number of annual
respondents: 194 (104 reactor licensees
plus 90 materials licencees).
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\28OCN1.SGM
28OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 208 (Thursday, October 28, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66391-66393]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27264]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Safety and Health Administration
[Docket No. OSHA-2010-0049]
Regulations Containing Procedures for Handling of Retaliation
Complaints; Extension of the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB)
Approval of Information Collection (Paperwork) Requirements
AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Request for public comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: OSHA solicits comments concerning its proposal to extend OMB
approval of the information collection requirements for handling of
retaliation complaints filed under various whistleblower protection
statutes contained in regulations at: 29 CFR part 24, Procedures for
the Handling of Retaliation Complaints under Federal Employee
Protection Statutes; 29 CFR part 1977, Discrimination Against Employees
Exercising Rights under the Williams-Steiger Occupational Safety and
Health Act; 29 CFR part 1978, Procedures for the Handling of
Retaliation Complaints under the Employee Protection Provision of the
Surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1982; 29 CFR part 1979,
Procedures for Handling Discrimination Complaints Under Section 519 of
the Wendell H. Ford Aviation Investment and Reform Act for the 21st
Century; 29 CFR part 1980, Procedures for Handling of Discrimination
Complaints Under Section 806 of the Corporate and Criminal Fraud
Accountability Act of 2002, Title VIII of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002;
29 CFR part 1981, Procedures for the Handling of Discrimination
Complaints under Section 6 of the Pipeline Safety and Improvement Act
of 2002; 29 CFR part 1982, Procedures for the Handling of Retaliation
Complaints Under the National Transit Systems Security Act of 2007,
Enacted as Section 1413 of the Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11
Commission Act of 2007, and the
[[Page 66392]]
Federal Railroad Safety Act, as Amended by Section 1521 of the
Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007; and 29
CFR part 1983, Procedures for the Handling of Retaliation Complaints
Under Section 219 of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of
2008. These regulations set forth procedures employees must use to file
a complaint with OSHA alleging that their employer violated a
whistleblower protection provision contained in certain statutes that
prohibit retaliatory action by employers against employees who engage
in activities protected by the statutes.
DATES: Comments must be submitted (postmarked, sent, or received) by
December 27, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Electronically: You may submit comments and attachments
electronically at https://www.regulations.gov, which is the Federal
eRulemaking Portal. Follow the instructions online for submitting
comments.
Facsimile: If your comments, including attachments, are not longer
than 10 pages, you may fax them to the OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693-
1648.
Mail, hand delivery, express mail, and messenger or courier
service: You must submit your comments and attachments to the OSHA
Docket Office, OSHA Docket No. OSHA-2010-0049, U.S. Department of
Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Room N-2625, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210. Deliveries (hand,
express mail, and messenger or courier service) are accepted during the
Department of Labor's and Docket Office's normal business hours, 8:15
a.m. to 4:45 p.m., e.t.
Instructions: All submissions must include the Agency name and OSHA
docket number for the Information Collection Request (ICR) (OSHA-2010-
0049). All comments, including any personal information you provide,
are placed in the public docket without change, and will be made
available online at https://www.regulations.gov. For further information
on submitting comments see the ``Public Participation'' heading in the
section of this notice titled SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
Docket: To read or download comments or other material in the
docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov or the OSHA Docket Office at
the address above. All documents in the docket (including this Federal
Register notice) are listed in the https://www.regulations.gov index;
however, some information (e.g., copyrighted material) is not publicly
available to read or download through the Web site. All submissions,
including copyrighted material, are available for inspection and
copying at the OSHA Docket Office. You may obtain a copy of the ICR by
contacting Theda Kenney or Todd Owen, Directorate of Standards and
Guidance, OSHA, U.S. Department of Labor, Room N-3609, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210; telephone: (202) 693-2222.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nilgun Tolek, Office of the
Whistleblower Protection Program, Directorate of Enforcement Programs,
OSHA, U.S. Department of Labor, Room N-3610, 200 Constitution Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC 20210; telephone: (202) 693-2199.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Department of Labor, as part of its continuing effort to reduce
paperwork and respondent (e.g., an employee filing a retaliation
complaint) burden, conducts a preclearance consultation program to
provide the public with an opportunity to comment on proposed and
continuing information collection requirements in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This program
ensures that information is in the desired format, reporting burden
(time and costs) is minimal, collection instruments are clearly
understood, and OSHA's estimate of the information collection burden is
accurate.
The Agency is responsible for investigating alleged violations of
``whistleblower'' provisions contained in a number of statutes. These
whistleblower provisions prohibit retaliation by employers against
employees who report alleged violations of certain laws or regulations.
Accordingly, these provisions prohibit an employer from discharging or
taking any other retaliatory action against an employee because the
employee engages in any of the protected activities specified by the
whistleblower provisions of the statutes.
These statutes are covered under the following regulations: 29 CFR
part 24, Procedures for the Handling of Retaliation Complaints under
Federal Employee Protection Statutes (29 CFR part 24 covers: Safe Water
Drinking Act, 42 U.S.C. 300j-9(i); Federal Water Pollution Control Act,
33 U.S.C. 1367; Toxic Substances Control Act, 15 U.S.C. 2622; Solid
Waste Disposal Act, 42 U.S.C. 6971; Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7622;
Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, 42 U.S.C. 5851; and the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act,
42 U.S.C. 9610); 29 CFR part 1977, Discrimination Against Employees
Exercising Rights under the Williams-Steiger Occupational Safety and
Health Act (29 CFR part 1977 covers: the Occupational Safety and Health
Act, 29 U.S.C. 660; the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, 15
U.S.C. 2651; and the International Safe Container Act, 46 U.S.C.
80507); 29 CFR part 1978, Procedures for the Handling of Retaliation
Complaints under the Employee Protection Provision of the Surface
Transportation Assistance Act of 1982; 29 CFR part 1979, Procedures for
Handling Discrimination Complaints Under the Wendell H. Ford Aviation
Investment and Reform Act for the 21st Century; 29 CFR part 1980,
Procedures for Handling of Discrimination Complaints Under Section 806
of the Corporate and Criminal Fraud Accountability Act of 2002, Title
VIII of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002; 29 CFR part 1981, Procedures
for the Handling of Discrimination Complaints under Section 6 of the
Pipeline Safety and Improvement Act of 2002; 29 CFR part 1982,
Procedures for the Handling of Retaliation Complaints Under the
National Transit Systems Security Act of 2007, Enacted as Section 1413
of the Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007,
and the Federal Railroad Safety Act, as Amended by Section 1521 of the
Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007; and 29
CFR part 1983, Procedures for the Handling of Retaliation Complaints
Under Section 219 of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of
2008. Information collection requirements contained in future
regulations promulgated by the Agency with respect to a whistleblower
provision of any other Federal law, except those that are assigned to
another DOL agency, will be added to this information collection.
These regulations specify the procedures that an employee must use
to file a complaint with OSHA alleging that their employer violated a
whistleblower provision for which the Agency has investigative
responsibility. Any employee who believes that such a violation
occurred may file a complaint, or have the complaint filed on their
behalf. Four of these regulations, 29 CFR parts 24, 1979, 1980 and
1981, require that complaints must be filed in writing, and should
include a full statement of the acts and omissions, with pertinent
dates, that are believed to constitute the violation. The other
regulations, 29 CFR
[[Page 66393]]
parts 1977, 1978, 1982, and 1983, require no particular form of filing
for complaints.
II. Special Issues for Comment
OSHA has a particular interest in comments on the following issues:
Whether the proposed information collection requirements
are necessary for the proper performance of the Agency's functions,
including whether the information is useful;
The accuracy of OSHA's estimate of the burden (time and
costs) of the information collection requirements, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
The quality, utility, and clarity of the information
collected; and
Ways to minimize the burden on individuals who must
comply; for example, by using automated or other technological
information collection and transmission techniques.
III. Proposed Actions
OSHA is requesting that OMB extend its approval of the information
collection requirements contained in the regulations containing
procedures for handling retaliation complaints at 29 CFR parts 24,
1978, 1979, 1980, 1981, 1982, and 1983.\1\ OSHA is proposing to
increase the burden hours in the currently approved information
collection request from 390 burden hours to 2,160 burden hours (a total
increase of 1,770 hours). These information collection requirements are
included in this extension. This increase is due to the Agency's
determination that all of the Agency's regulations containing
procedures for the investigation of retaliation complaints, regardless
of the form used to file a complaint, contain information collection
requirements associated with the initiation of the complaint. The
increase is also due to updated information showing an increase in the
annual number of complaints filed. The Agency will summarize the
comments submitted in response to this notice, and will include this
summary in the request to OMB.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Several of these regulations use the term ``discrimination''
or ``discrimination complaints'' in their titles. These terms are
synonymous with ``retaliation'' and ``retaliation complaints,''
respectively.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
Title: Regulations Containing Procedures for Handling Retaliation
Complaints.
OMB Number: 1218-0236.
Affected Public: Individuals.
Number of Respondents: 2,160.
Frequency of Recordkeeping: Once per complaint.
Average Time per Response: 1 hour.
Total Annual Hours Requested: 2,160.
Estimated Cost (Operation and Maintenance): $0.
IV. Public Participation--Submission of Comments on This Notice and
Internet Access to Comments and Submissions
You may submit comments in response to this document as follows:
(1) Electronically at https://www.regulations.gov, which is the Federal
eRulemaking Portal; (2) by facsimile (fax); or (3) by hard copy. All
comments, attachments, and other material must identify the Agency name
and the OSHA docket number for the ICR (Docket No. OSHA-2010-0049). You
may supplement electronic submissions by uploading document files
electronically. If you wish to mail additional materials in reference
to an electronic or facsimile submission, you must submit them to the
OSHA Docket Office (see the section of this notice titled ADDRESSES).
The additional materials must clearly identify your electronic comments
by your name, date, and the docket number so the Agency can attach them
to your comments.
Because of security procedures, the use of regular mail may cause a
significant delay in the receipt of comments. For information about
security procedures concerning the delivery of materials by hand,
express delivery, and messenger or courier service, please contact the
OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693-2350, (TTY (877) 889-5627).
Comments and submissions are posted without change at https://www.regulations.gov. Therefore, OSHA cautions commenters about
submitting personal information such as social security numbers and
date of birth. Although all submissions are listed in the https://www.regulations.gov index, some information (e.g., copyrighted
material) is not publicly available to read or download through this
Web site. All submissions, including copyrighted material, are
available for inspection and copying at the OSHA Docket Office.
Information on using the https://www.regulations.gov Web site to submit
comments and access the docket is available at the Web site's ``User
Tips'' link. Contact the OSHA Docket Office for information about
materials not available through the Web site, and for assistance in
using the Internet to locate docket submissions.
V. Authority and Signature
David Michaels, PhD, MPH, Assistant Secretary of Labor for
Occupational Safety and Health, directed the preparation of this
notice. The authority for this notice is the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3506 et seq.) and Secretary of Labor's Order No. 4-2010
(75 FR 55355).
Signed at Washington, DC, on October 25, 2010.
David Michaels,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2010-27264 Filed 10-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-26-P