In the Matter of Certain DC-DC Controllers and Products Containing Same; Notice of Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating The Investigation, 65651-65652 [2010-27024]

Download as PDF emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 206 / Tuesday, October 26, 2010 / Notices 2 years from May 17, 2010, the date the closure order was signed by the authorized officer. The closure may be extended beyond this period, if necessary, until the BLM Salt Lake Field Office Manager has determined emergency stabilization and rehabilitation treatments have been successful and the threat of resource damage from motorized vehicle travel no longer exists in the area. The BLM will provide appropriate public notification when the motor vehicle travel restrictions are lifted for the area. Fencing and closure signs will be removed as necessary. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Glenn Carpenter, District Manager, BLM, West Desert District, 2370 South 2300 West, Salt Lake City, Utah 84119; by phone at 801–977–4300; or by e-mail at utslmail@blm.gov. Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339 to contact the above individuals during normal business hours. The FIRS is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, to leave a message or question with the above individuals. You will receive a reply during normal hours. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This temporary closure affects public lands within the Big Pole Fire area in Tooele County, Utah, and encompasses all public lands administered by the BLM Salt Lake Field Office east of State Route 196, south of Interstate 80, west of the crest of the Stansbury Mountain range, and north of the Skull Valley Goshute Indian Reservation in Tooele County, Utah. The legal description of the affected area is all public lands within Townships 1, 2, 3 and 4 South, Ranges 7 and 8 West, Salt Lake Meridian. The closure and stabilization actions were analyzed pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act, in the Big Pole Fire Motor Vehicle Closure environmental assessment (DOI–BLM– W010–2010–0005–EA) and FY2009 Emergency Stabilization and Rehabilitation determination of NEPA adequacy (DOI–BLM–UT–W000–2009– 0001–DNA), respectively. This closure is being implemented for the purposes of protecting soil, watershed, vegetation, and cultural resources which the BLM Salt Lake Field Office has determined are at immediate risk. The reasons for implementing this closure are based on a risk determination which, in turn, is based on field observations and stabilization planning conducted by the BLM staff specialists following the Big Pole Fire, which started on August 6, 2009, and was declared contained on August 16, 2009. This wildfire was VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:09 Oct 25, 2010 Jkt 223001 particularly intense due to winds in excess of 40 mph and heavy fuel loads of cheatgrass and juniper trees. The BLM monitoring revealed extensive resource damage caused by the burn patterns and the severity of a wildfire that burned over 44,000 acres in approximately 24 hours. Heavy soil scorching and a total loss of vegetative cover have resulted in a significantly greater risk for water runoff and soil erosion. Soil composition in the area is highly erodible. Subsequent motor vehicle traffic in burned areas has increased the risk of erosion and may have a negative impact on efforts to stabilize soils and establish new vegetation. Motor vehicle travel may also increase the spread of invasive species, such as cheatgrass, into areas damaged by wildfire. The BLM Salt Lake Field Office is implementing a comprehensive emergency stabilization and rehabilitation plan within the Big Pole fire area which includes seeding, planting, soil treatments, noxious weed control, fencing, signing, resource monitoring, and law enforcement. The following persons are exempt from this order: Federal, state, and local officers and employees in the performance of their official duties; members of organized rescue or fire-fighting forces in the performance of their official duties; and persons with written authorization from the Bureau of Land Management. The closure order has been posted at major entry points to the burn area. Copies of the closure order and maps of the closed area have been made available at the BLM West Desert District’s Salt Lake Field Office, 2370 South 2300 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84119. The closure was also published on the BLM Salt Lake Field Office Web site and distributed to local government and media outlets. Penalties: Under the authority of Section 303(a) of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1733(a)), 43 CFR 8341.2(a), 43 CFR 8364.1, and 43 CFR 9268.3(d), the Bureau of Land Management is enforcing the following rule(s) within the Big Pole Fire Area: You must not use motorized vehicles in the closed area. Any person who violates the above rule may be issued a citation, tried before a United States Magistrate, and fined no more than $1,000, imprisoned for no more than 12 months, or both, as provided for in 43 CFR 8340.0–7. Such violations may also be subject to the enhanced fines provided for by 18 U.S.C. 3571 and 3581. PO 00000 Frm 00046 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 65651 Authorities: 43 CFR 8341.2(a), 8364.1, and 9268.3(d). Juan Palma, State Director. [FR Doc. 2010–27030 Filed 10–25–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–DQ–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–698] In the Matter of Certain DC–DC Controllers and Products Containing Same; Notice of Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating The Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Corrected Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative law judge’s initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 56) granting a joint motion to terminate the investigation as to one respondent and terminating the investigation in its entirety. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sidney A. Rosenzweig, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–2532. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUMMARY: The Commission instituted this investigation on December 29, 2009, based on a complaint filed by Richtek Technology Corp. (Taiwan) and Richtek USA, Inc. (San Jose, California) (collectively ‘‘Richtek’’), alleging a violation of section 337 in the importation, sale for importation, and sale within the United States after importation of certain DC– DC controllers by reason of infringement SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: E:\FR\FM\26OCN1.SGM 26OCN1 emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES 65652 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 206 / Tuesday, October 26, 2010 / Notices of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,315,190; 6,414,470; and 7,132,717; and by reason of trade secret misappropriation. 75 FR 446 (Jan. 5, 2010). The complaint, as amended, named eight respondents: uPI Semiconductor Corp. (Taiwan) (‘‘uPI’’); Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (Sunnyvale, California) (‘‘AMD’’); Sapphire Technology Ltd. (Hong Kong) (‘‘Sapphire’’); Best Data Products d/b/a Diamond Multimedia (Chatsworth, California) (‘‘Diamond’’); Eastcom, Inc. d/b/a XFX Technology USA (Rowland Heights, California) (‘‘XFX’’); Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. (Taiwan) and MSI Computer Corp. (City of Industry, California) (collectively, ‘‘MSI’’); and VisionTek Products LLC (Inverness, Illinois) (‘‘VisionTek’’). See Second Am. Compl. ¶¶ 12–34 (May 20, 2010). The investigation has been terminated by settlement agreement or consent order against all parties other than VisionTek: On July 12, 2010, the Commission determined not to review the ALJ’s termination of the investigation as against AMD, Diamond, and XFX. On August 13, 2010, the Commission determined not to review the ALJ’s termination of the investigation against uPI and Sapphire. On August 20, 2010, the Commission determined not to review the ALJ’s termination of the investigation against the MSI respondents. On July 27, 2010, VisionTek and Richtek jointly moved to terminate the investigation based on a consent order stipulation and proposed consent order. The ALJ denied the motion. Order No. 51 (July 29, 2010). On August 5, 2010, VisionTek and Richtek jointly moved to terminate the investigation based on a settlement agreement. On August 17, 2010, the ALJ granted the motion. Order No. 56. Because VisionTek is the last respondent, termination against VisionTek results in termination of the investigation. No petitions for review of the ID were filed. The Commission has determined not to review the ID. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in sections 210.21(b) and 210.42 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.21(b), 210.42). By order of the Commission. Issued: October 21, 2010. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2010–27024 Filed 10–25–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:09 Oct 25, 2010 Jkt 223001 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Notice of Receipt of Complaint; Solicitation of Comments Relating to the Public Interest U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has received a complaint entitled In Re Certain Products Containing Interactive Program Guide and Parental Controls Technology, DN 2763; the Commission is soliciting comments on any public interest issues raised by the complaint. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. The public version of the complaint can be accessed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov, and will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearingimpaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission has received a complaint filed on behalf of Rovi Corporation, Rovi Guides, Inc. (f/k/a Gemstar-TV Guide International Inc.), United Video Properties, Inc., and Index Systems, Inc. on October 20, 2010. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1337) in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain products containing interactive program guide and parental controls technology. The complaint names as respondents Toshiba Corp. of Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105–8001, Japan; Toshiba America, Inc. of New York, NY; Toshiba America Consumer Products, L.L.C. of Wayne, NJ; and Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc. of Irvine, CA. SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00047 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 The complainant, proposed respondents, other interested parties, and members of the public are invited to file comments, not to exceed five pages in length, on any public interest issues raised by the complaint. Comments should address whether issuance of an exclusion order and/or a cease and desist order in this investigation would negatively affect the public health and welfare in the United States, competitive conditions in the United States economy, the production of like or directly competitive articles in the United States, or United States consumers. In particular, the Commission is interested in comments that: (i) Explain how the articles potentially subject to the orders are used in the United States; (ii) Identify any public health, safety, or welfare concerns in the United States relating to the potential orders; (iii) Indicate the extent to which like or directly competitive articles are produced in the United States or are otherwise available in the United States, with respect to the articles potentially subject to the orders; and (iv) Indicate whether Complainant, Complainant’s licensees, and/or third party suppliers have the capacity to replace the volume of articles potentially subject to an exclusion order and a cease and desist order within a commercially reasonable time. Written submissions must be filed no later than by close of business, five business days after the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register. There will be further opportunities for comment on the public interest after the issuance of any final initial determination in this investigation. Persons filing written submissions must file the original document and 12 true copies thereof on or before the deadlines stated above with the Office of the Secretary. Submissions should refer to the docket number (‘‘Docket No. 2763’’) in a prominent place on the cover page and/or the first page. The Commission’s rules authorize filing submissions with the Secretary by facsimile or electronic means only to the extent permitted by section 201.8 of the rules (see Handbook for Electronic Filing Procedures, https://www.usitc.gov/ secretary/fed_reg_notices/rules/ documents/ handbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf). Persons with questions regarding electronic filing should contact the Secretary (202–205–2000). Any person desiring to submit a document to the Commission in confidence must request confidential E:\FR\FM\26OCN1.SGM 26OCN1

Agencies

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 206 (Tuesday, October 26, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65651-65652]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27024]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-698]


In the Matter of Certain DC-DC Controllers and Products 
Containing Same; Notice of Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial 
Determination Terminating The Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Corrected Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative 
law judge's initial determination (``ID'') (Order No. 56) granting a 
joint motion to terminate the investigation as to one respondent and 
terminating the investigation in its entirety.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sidney A. Rosenzweig, Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, 
SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-2532. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the 
Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at 
https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be 
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information 
on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD 
terminal on (202) 205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on December 29, 2009, based on a complaint filed by Richtek Technology 
Corp. (Taiwan) and Richtek USA, Inc. (San Jose, California) 
(collectively ``Richtek''), alleging a violation of section 337 in the 
importation, sale for importation, and sale within the United States 
after importation of certain DC-DC controllers by reason of 
infringement

[[Page 65652]]

of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,315,190; 6,414,470; and 
7,132,717; and by reason of trade secret misappropriation. 75 FR 446 
(Jan. 5, 2010). The complaint, as amended, named eight respondents: uPI 
Semiconductor Corp. (Taiwan) (``uPI''); Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 
(Sunnyvale, California) (``AMD''); Sapphire Technology Ltd. (Hong Kong) 
(``Sapphire''); Best Data Products d/b/a Diamond Multimedia 
(Chatsworth, California) (``Diamond''); Eastcom, Inc. d/b/a XFX 
Technology USA (Rowland Heights, California) (``XFX''); Micro-Star 
International Co., Ltd. (Taiwan) and MSI Computer Corp. (City of 
Industry, California) (collectively, ``MSI''); and VisionTek Products 
LLC (Inverness, Illinois) (``VisionTek''). See Second Am. Compl. ]] 12-
34 (May 20, 2010).
    The investigation has been terminated by settlement agreement or 
consent order against all parties other than VisionTek: On July 12, 
2010, the Commission determined not to review the ALJ's termination of 
the investigation as against AMD, Diamond, and XFX. On August 13, 2010, 
the Commission determined not to review the ALJ's termination of the 
investigation against uPI and Sapphire. On August 20, 2010, the 
Commission determined not to review the ALJ's termination of the 
investigation against the MSI respondents.
    On July 27, 2010, VisionTek and Richtek jointly moved to terminate 
the investigation based on a consent order stipulation and proposed 
consent order. The ALJ denied the motion. Order No. 51 (July 29, 2010). 
On August 5, 2010, VisionTek and Richtek jointly moved to terminate the 
investigation based on a settlement agreement. On August 17, 2010, the 
ALJ granted the motion. Order No. 56. Because VisionTek is the last 
respondent, termination against VisionTek results in termination of the 
investigation.
    No petitions for review of the ID were filed. The Commission has 
determined not to review the ID.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in sections 210.21(b) and 210.42 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (19 CFR 210.21(b), 210.42).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: October 21, 2010.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-27024 Filed 10-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.