Raleigh Film and Television Studios, LLC, Los Angeles, CA; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration, 65512-65513 [2010-26900]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
65512
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 205 / Monday, October 25, 2010 / Notices
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Attn: OMB Desk Officer for the
Department of Labor—Employee
Benefits Security Administration
(EBSA), Office of Management and
Budget, Room 10235, Washington, DC
20503, Telephone: 202–395–6881/Fax
202–395–5806 (these are not toll-free
numbers), E-mail:
OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov within
30 days from the date of this publication
in the Federal Register. In order to
ensure the appropriate consideration,
comments should reference the
applicable OMB Control Number (see
below).
The OMB is particularly interested in
comments which:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Agency: Employee Benefits Security
Administration.
Type of Review: Extension without
change of a currently approved
collection.
Title of Collection: Default Investment
Alternatives under Individual Account
Plans.
OMB Control Number: 1210–0132.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit; Not-for-profit institutions.
Cost to Federal Government: $0.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
648,000.
Total Number of Responses:
83,358,375.
Total Estimated Annual Burden
Hours: 782,000.
Total Estimated Annual Cost Burden
(operating/maintaining): $32,116,000.
Description: Section 404(c) of the
Employee Retirement Income Security
Act of 1974 (ERISA) states that
participants or beneficiaries who can
hold individual accounts under their
pension plans, and who can exercise
control over the assets in their accounts
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:05 Oct 22, 2010
Jkt 223001
‘‘as determined in regulations of the
Secretary [of Labor]’’ will not be treated
as fiduciaries of the plan. Moreover, no
other plan fiduciary will be liable for
any loss, or by reason of any breach,
resulting from the participants’ or
beneficiaries exercise of control over
their individual account assets.
The Pension Protection Act (PPA),
Public Law 109–280, amended ERISA
section 404(c) by adding subparagraph
(c)(5)(A). The new subparagraph says
that a participant in an individual
account plan who fails to make
investment elections regarding his or
her account assets will nevertheless be
treated as having exercised control over
those assets so long as the plan provides
appropriate notice (as specified) and
invests the assets ‘‘in accordance with
regulations prescribed by the Secretary
[of Labor].’’ Section 404(c)(5)(A) further
requires the Department of Labor
(Department) to issue corresponding
final regulations within six months after
enactment of the PPA. The PPA was
signed into law on August 17, 2006.
The Department of Labor issued a
final regulation under ERISA section
404(c)(5)(A) offering guidance on the
types of investment vehicles that plans
may choose as their ‘‘qualified default
investment alternative’’(QDIA). The
regulation also outlines two information
collections. First, it implements the
statutory requirement that plans provide
annual notices to participants and
beneficiaries whose account assets
could be invested in a QDIA. Second,
the regulation requires plans to pass
certain pertinent materials they receive
relating to a QDIA to those participants
and beneficiaries with assets invested in
the QDIA as well to provide certain
information on request. The ICRs are
approved under OMB Control Number
1210–0132, which is scheduled to
expire on October 31, 2010.
For additional information, see
related notice published in the Federal
Register on August 23, 2010 (75 FR
51843).
Agency: Employee Benefits Security
Administration.
Type of Review: Extension without
change of a currently approved
collection.
Title of Collection: Regulation
Relating to Loans to Plan Participants
and Beneficiaries who are Parties in
Interest with Respect to the Plan.
OMB Control Number: 1210–0076.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit.
Cost to Federal Government: $0.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
1,900.
Total Number of Responses: 1,900.
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Total Estimated Annual Burden
Hours: 0.
Total Estimated Annual Cost Burden
(operating/maintaining): $673,000.
Description: The Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
(ERISA) prohibits a plan fiduciary from
causing the plan to engage in a
transaction if he knows or should know
that such transaction constitutes direct
or indirect loan or extension of credit
between the plan and a party in interest.
ERISA section 408(b)(1) exempts from
this prohibition loans from a plan to
parties in interest who are participants
and beneficiaries of the plan, provided
that certain requirements are satisfied.
In final regulations published in the
Federal Register on July 20, 1989, (54
FR 30520), the Department provided
additional guidance on section
408(b)(1)(C), which requires that loans
be made in accordance with specific
provisions in the plan. This ICR
therefore relates to the provisions plan
documents must include in order for a
plan may make loans to participants.
The ICR is scheduled to expire on
October 31, 2010.
For additional information, see
related notice published in the Federal
Register on August 23, 2010 (75 FR
51844).
Dated: October 18, 2010.
Linda Watts Thomas,
Acting Departmental Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010–26868 Filed 10–22–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–29–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–72,587]
Raleigh Film and Television Studios,
LLC, Los Angeles, CA; Notice of
Affirmative Determination Regarding
Application for Reconsideration
By application dated January 24,
2010, the petitioner requested
administrative reconsideration of the
negative determination regarding
workers’ eligibility to apply for Trade
Adjustment Assistance (TAA)
applicable to workers and former
workers of Raleigh Film and Television
Studios, LLC, Los Angeles, California
(the subject firm). The Notice of
determination was issued on January 14,
2010 and published in the Federal
Register on February 16, 2010 (75 FR
7039). The workers provide sound
stages, production, office space,
catering, security, and other services to
the entertainment production industry.
E:\FR\FM\25OCN1.SGM
25OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 205 / Monday, October 25, 2010 / Notices
The initial investigation resulted in a
negative determination based on the
findings that there was, during the
relevant period, no increase in imports
of services like or directly competitive
with those supplied by the workers by
either the subject firm or its customers,
nor a shift to/acquisition from a foreign
country by the subject firm of like or
directly competitive services. The
investigation also revealed that the
workers did not produce a component
part or supply a service that was
directly used by a firm that employed a
worker group eligible to apply for TAA.
The request for reconsideration
alleges that the subject firm ‘‘is actively
building large film studios in both
Budapest, Hungary and Khazastan.’’
The Department has carefully
reviewed the request for reconsideration
and the existing record, and has
determined that the Department will
conduct further investigation to
determine if the workers meet the
eligibility requirements of the Trade Act
of 1974, as amended.
Conclusion
After careful review of the
application, I conclude that the claim is
of sufficient weight to justify
reconsideration of the U.S. Department
of Labor’s prior decision. The
application is, therefore, granted.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 7th day of
October 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010–26900 Filed 10–22–10; 8:45 am]
on May 20, 2010 (75 FR 28301). The
workers produce the GMC Sierra and
Chevrolet Silverado.
The negative determination was based
on the findings that there was no
increase in imports by the firm or
customers or a shift to/acquisition from
a foreign country by the workers’ firm
of articles like or directly competitive
with the automobiles produced by the
workers. The investigation also revealed
that the workers did not produce a
component part that was used by a firm
that employed workers eligible to apply
for TAA and that directly incorporated
the component parts into the article that
was the basis for the TAA certification.
The UAW’s request for
reconsideration states that production of
standard cab and extended cab GMC
Sierra and Chevrolet Silverado vehicles
shifted to an affiliated facility in
Mexico. The request for reconsideration
also includes new information in
support of the allegation.
The Department has carefully
reviewed the request for reconsideration
and the existing record, and has
determined that the Department will
conduct further investigation to
determine if the workers meet the
eligibility requirements of the Trade Act
of 1974, as amended.
Conclusion
After careful review of the
application, I conclude that the claim is
of sufficient weight to justify
reconsideration of the U.S. Department
of Labor’s prior decision. The
application is, therefore, granted.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 7th day of
October 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[FR Doc. 2010–26899 Filed 10–22–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
[TA–W–72,554]
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
General Motors Company, Pontiac
Company, Pontiac, MI; Notice of
Affirmative Determination Regarding
Application for Reconsideration
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
By application dated June 11, 2010, a
representative of the International
Union of United Automobile,
Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement
Workers of America (UAW) requested
administrative reconsideration of the
negative determination regarding
workers’ eligibility to apply for Trade
Adjustment Assistance (TAA)
applicable to workers and former
workers of the subject firm. The
determination was issued on April 12,
2010 and the Notice of Determination
was published in the Federal Register
[TA–W–72,510]
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:05 Oct 22, 2010
Jkt 223001
Employment and Training
Administration
JELD–WEN Millwork Distribution,
Wilkesboro, NC; Notice of Affirmative
Determination Regarding Application
for Reconsideration
of negative determination was issued on
January 11, 2010 and published in the
Federal Register on February 16, 2010
(75 FR 7039). The workers produce
wooden exterior door frames.
The initial investigation resulted in a
negative determination based on the
findings that there was no increase in
imports of like or directly competitive
articles by either the subject firm or its
customers, and no shift to/acquisition
from a foreign country by the workers’
firm of production of like or directly
competitive articles. The investigation
also revealed that the subject firm did
not produce a component part that was
used by a firm that employed workers
eligible to apply for TAA and used the
component parts in the production of
the article that was the basis for the
certification.
The workers, in the request for
reconsideration, state that subject firm’s
competitors and customer have
increased imports of like or directly
competitive articles from China. The
workers also allege that the articles
produced at the subject firm include
door component parts (‘‘door jambs,
door T–AST, door mull posts’’) and
window component parts (‘‘replacement
window grills’’), and that those articles
are being imported from China.
The Department has carefully
reviewed the request for reconsideration
and the existing record, and has
determined that the Department will
conduct further investigation to
determine if the workers meet the
eligibility requirements of the Trade Act
of 1974, as amended.
Conclusion
After careful review of the
application, I conclude that the claim is
of sufficient weight to justify
reconsideration of the U.S. Department
of Labor’s prior decision. The
application is, therefore, granted.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 7th day of
October 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010–26898 Filed 10–22–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
By application dated February 3,
2010, the petitioner requested
administrative reconsideration of the
negative determination regarding
workers’ eligibility to apply for Trade
Adjustment Assistance (TAA)
applicable to workers and former
workers of the subject firm. The Notice
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
65513
E:\FR\FM\25OCN1.SGM
25OCN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 205 (Monday, October 25, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65512-65513]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26900]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-72,587]
Raleigh Film and Television Studios, LLC, Los Angeles, CA; Notice
of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration
By application dated January 24, 2010, the petitioner requested
administrative reconsideration of the negative determination regarding
workers' eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA)
applicable to workers and former workers of Raleigh Film and Television
Studios, LLC, Los Angeles, California (the subject firm). The Notice of
determination was issued on January 14, 2010 and published in the
Federal Register on February 16, 2010 (75 FR 7039). The workers provide
sound stages, production, office space, catering, security, and other
services to the entertainment production industry.
[[Page 65513]]
The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination
based on the findings that there was, during the relevant period, no
increase in imports of services like or directly competitive with those
supplied by the workers by either the subject firm or its customers,
nor a shift to/acquisition from a foreign country by the subject firm
of like or directly competitive services. The investigation also
revealed that the workers did not produce a component part or supply a
service that was directly used by a firm that employed a worker group
eligible to apply for TAA.
The request for reconsideration alleges that the subject firm ``is
actively building large film studios in both Budapest, Hungary and
Khazastan.''
The Department has carefully reviewed the request for
reconsideration and the existing record, and has determined that the
Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the
workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended.
Conclusion
After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S.
Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore,
granted.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 7th day of October 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-26900 Filed 10-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
