Sypris Technologies, Sypris Solutions Division, Kenton, OH; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration, 65514 [2010-26896]
Download as PDF
65514
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 205 / Monday, October 25, 2010 / Notices
Signed at Washington, DC, this 7th day of
October 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–72,029]
[TA–W–70,910]
Automotive Components Holdings,
LLC, A Subsidiary of Ford Motor
Company, Saline Plant Division,
Saline, MI; Notice of Affirmative
Determination Regarding Application
for Reconsideration
Sypris Technologies, Sypris Solutions
Division, Kenton, OH; Notice of
Affirmative Determination Regarding
Application for Reconsideration
[FR Doc. 2010–26896 Filed 10–22–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
By application sent to this office on
April 8, 2010, the United Automobile,
Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement
Workers of America (UAW), Local 1124,
requested administrative
reconsideration of the negative
determination regarding workers’
eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment
Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers
and former workers of the subject firm.
The determination was issued on
February 19, 2010, and the Notice of
Determination was published in the
Federal Register on March 12, 2010 (75
FR 11925). The workers produce
interior automotive components.
The negative determination was based
on the findings that neither a significant
number nor proportion of workers at the
subject facility was totally or partially
separated, or threatened with such
separation, during the relevant period.
The UAW asserts that the Department
has misinterpreted the statute and states
that ‘‘as many as 830 Visteon workers
were notified that they would be
replaced’’ and asserts that about 1,800
workers were employed at the subject
firm.
The Department has carefully
reviewed the request for reconsideration
and the existing record, and has
determined that the Department will
conduct further investigation to
determine if the workers meet the
eligibility requirements of the Trade Act
of 1974, as amended.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Conclusion
After careful review of the
application, I conclude that the claim is
of sufficient weight to justify
reconsideration of the U.S. Department
of Labor’s prior decision. The
application is, therefore, granted.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 7th day of
October 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010–26897 Filed 10–22–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:05 Oct 22, 2010
Jkt 223001
By application sent to this office on
March 19, 2010, the United Steel
Workers, Local 1–109, requested
administrative reconsideration of the
negative determination regarding
workers’ eligibility to apply for Trade
Adjustment Assistance (TAA)
applicable to workers and former
workers of the subject firm. The Notice
of determination was issued on
February 18, 2010, and was published
in the Federal Register on March 12,
2010 (75 FR 11925). The workers
produce trailer axels.
The negative determination was based
on the findings that, during the relevant
period, there was no increase in imports
of articles like or directly competitive
with the trailer axles produced by the
subject firm, and no shift to/acquisition
from a foreign country by the subject
firm of articles like or directly
competitive with trailer axles. The
investigation also revealed that the
subject firm did not supply a
component part to a firm that employed
a worker group eligible to apply for
TAA and directly incorporated the
component part into the finished article
that was the basis for the TAA
certification.
The request for reconsideration
alleges that the subject firm used to
manufacture ‘‘drive axels housings,
steering arms, brake shoes and many
other components in the heavy truck
industry’’ in addition to trailer axels.
The Department has carefully
reviewed the request for reconsideration
and the existing record, and has
determined that the Department will
conduct further investigation to
determine if the workers meet the
eligibility requirements of the Trade Act
of 1974, as amended.
Conclusion
After careful review of the
application, I conclude that the claim is
of sufficient weight to justify
reconsideration of the U.S. Department
of Labor’s prior decision. The
application is, therefore, granted.
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–70,110]
Columbia Forest Products, Inc.,
Presque Isle Division, Presque Isle,
ME; Notice of Affirmative
Determination Regarding Application
for Reconsideration
By application dated February 16,
2010, workers requested administrative
reconsideration of the negative
determination regarding workers’
eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment
Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers
and former workers of the subject firm.
The determination was issued on
January 25, 2010, and the Notice of
Determination was published in the
Federal Register on March 5, 2010 (75
FR 10323). The workers produce
hardwood veneer.
The negative determination was based
on the findings that, during the relevant
period, there was no increase in imports
of articles like or directly competitive
with the hardwood veneer produced by
the subject firm, and no shift to/
acquisition from a foreign country by
the subject firm of articles like or
directly competitive with hardwood
veneer. The investigation also revealed
that the subject firm did not supply a
component part to a firm that employed
a worker group eligible to apply for
TAA and directly incorporated the
component part into the finished article
that was the basis for the TAA
certification.
The request for reconsideration
asserts that the Department has
misinterpreted the statute to the
detriment of the petitioning workers.
Specifically, the workers allege ‘‘the
Trade Act does not just look at whether
the subject firm increased imports, but
that imports increased in general.’’ In
support of the request for
reconsideration, the workers provided
various articles regarding increased
imports of like or directly competitive
articles from China, Canada, and other
countries.
The Department has carefully
reviewed the request for reconsideration
and the existing record, and has
determined that the Department will
E:\FR\FM\25OCN1.SGM
25OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 205 (Monday, October 25, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 65514]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26896]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-70,910]
Sypris Technologies, Sypris Solutions Division, Kenton, OH;
Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for
Reconsideration
By application sent to this office on March 19, 2010, the United
Steel Workers, Local 1-109, requested administrative reconsideration of
the negative determination regarding workers' eligibility to apply for
Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers and former
workers of the subject firm. The Notice of determination was issued on
February 18, 2010, and was published in the Federal Register on March
12, 2010 (75 FR 11925). The workers produce trailer axels.
The negative determination was based on the findings that, during
the relevant period, there was no increase in imports of articles like
or directly competitive with the trailer axles produced by the subject
firm, and no shift to/acquisition from a foreign country by the subject
firm of articles like or directly competitive with trailer axles. The
investigation also revealed that the subject firm did not supply a
component part to a firm that employed a worker group eligible to apply
for TAA and directly incorporated the component part into the finished
article that was the basis for the TAA certification.
The request for reconsideration alleges that the subject firm used
to manufacture ``drive axels housings, steering arms, brake shoes and
many other components in the heavy truck industry'' in addition to
trailer axels.
The Department has carefully reviewed the request for
reconsideration and the existing record, and has determined that the
Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the
workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended.
Conclusion
After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S.
Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore,
granted.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 7th day of October 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-26896 Filed 10-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P