Columbia Forest Products, Inc., Presque Isle Division, Presque Isle, ME; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration, 65514-65515 [2010-26895]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
65514
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 205 / Monday, October 25, 2010 / Notices
Signed at Washington, DC, this 7th day of
October 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–72,029]
[TA–W–70,910]
Automotive Components Holdings,
LLC, A Subsidiary of Ford Motor
Company, Saline Plant Division,
Saline, MI; Notice of Affirmative
Determination Regarding Application
for Reconsideration
Sypris Technologies, Sypris Solutions
Division, Kenton, OH; Notice of
Affirmative Determination Regarding
Application for Reconsideration
[FR Doc. 2010–26896 Filed 10–22–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
By application sent to this office on
April 8, 2010, the United Automobile,
Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement
Workers of America (UAW), Local 1124,
requested administrative
reconsideration of the negative
determination regarding workers’
eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment
Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers
and former workers of the subject firm.
The determination was issued on
February 19, 2010, and the Notice of
Determination was published in the
Federal Register on March 12, 2010 (75
FR 11925). The workers produce
interior automotive components.
The negative determination was based
on the findings that neither a significant
number nor proportion of workers at the
subject facility was totally or partially
separated, or threatened with such
separation, during the relevant period.
The UAW asserts that the Department
has misinterpreted the statute and states
that ‘‘as many as 830 Visteon workers
were notified that they would be
replaced’’ and asserts that about 1,800
workers were employed at the subject
firm.
The Department has carefully
reviewed the request for reconsideration
and the existing record, and has
determined that the Department will
conduct further investigation to
determine if the workers meet the
eligibility requirements of the Trade Act
of 1974, as amended.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Conclusion
After careful review of the
application, I conclude that the claim is
of sufficient weight to justify
reconsideration of the U.S. Department
of Labor’s prior decision. The
application is, therefore, granted.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 7th day of
October 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010–26897 Filed 10–22–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:05 Oct 22, 2010
Jkt 223001
By application sent to this office on
March 19, 2010, the United Steel
Workers, Local 1–109, requested
administrative reconsideration of the
negative determination regarding
workers’ eligibility to apply for Trade
Adjustment Assistance (TAA)
applicable to workers and former
workers of the subject firm. The Notice
of determination was issued on
February 18, 2010, and was published
in the Federal Register on March 12,
2010 (75 FR 11925). The workers
produce trailer axels.
The negative determination was based
on the findings that, during the relevant
period, there was no increase in imports
of articles like or directly competitive
with the trailer axles produced by the
subject firm, and no shift to/acquisition
from a foreign country by the subject
firm of articles like or directly
competitive with trailer axles. The
investigation also revealed that the
subject firm did not supply a
component part to a firm that employed
a worker group eligible to apply for
TAA and directly incorporated the
component part into the finished article
that was the basis for the TAA
certification.
The request for reconsideration
alleges that the subject firm used to
manufacture ‘‘drive axels housings,
steering arms, brake shoes and many
other components in the heavy truck
industry’’ in addition to trailer axels.
The Department has carefully
reviewed the request for reconsideration
and the existing record, and has
determined that the Department will
conduct further investigation to
determine if the workers meet the
eligibility requirements of the Trade Act
of 1974, as amended.
Conclusion
After careful review of the
application, I conclude that the claim is
of sufficient weight to justify
reconsideration of the U.S. Department
of Labor’s prior decision. The
application is, therefore, granted.
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–70,110]
Columbia Forest Products, Inc.,
Presque Isle Division, Presque Isle,
ME; Notice of Affirmative
Determination Regarding Application
for Reconsideration
By application dated February 16,
2010, workers requested administrative
reconsideration of the negative
determination regarding workers’
eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment
Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers
and former workers of the subject firm.
The determination was issued on
January 25, 2010, and the Notice of
Determination was published in the
Federal Register on March 5, 2010 (75
FR 10323). The workers produce
hardwood veneer.
The negative determination was based
on the findings that, during the relevant
period, there was no increase in imports
of articles like or directly competitive
with the hardwood veneer produced by
the subject firm, and no shift to/
acquisition from a foreign country by
the subject firm of articles like or
directly competitive with hardwood
veneer. The investigation also revealed
that the subject firm did not supply a
component part to a firm that employed
a worker group eligible to apply for
TAA and directly incorporated the
component part into the finished article
that was the basis for the TAA
certification.
The request for reconsideration
asserts that the Department has
misinterpreted the statute to the
detriment of the petitioning workers.
Specifically, the workers allege ‘‘the
Trade Act does not just look at whether
the subject firm increased imports, but
that imports increased in general.’’ In
support of the request for
reconsideration, the workers provided
various articles regarding increased
imports of like or directly competitive
articles from China, Canada, and other
countries.
The Department has carefully
reviewed the request for reconsideration
and the existing record, and has
determined that the Department will
E:\FR\FM\25OCN1.SGM
25OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 205 / Monday, October 25, 2010 / Notices
conduct further investigation to
determine if the workers meet the
eligibility requirements of the Trade Act
of 1974, as amended.
Conclusion
After careful review of the
application, I conclude that the claim is
of sufficient weight to justify
reconsideration of the U.S. Department
of Labor’s prior decision. The
application is, therefore, granted.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 7th day of
October 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010–26895 Filed 10–22–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
Employment and Training
Administration
[FR Doc. 2010–26906 Filed 10–22–10; 8:45 am]
[TA–W–74,347]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
NRC Corporation, USPS Help Desk of
Customer Care Center, Including OnSite Leased Workers of Volt
Consulting, West Columbia, SC; Notice
of Affirmative Determination Regarding
Application for Reconsideration
By application dated September 16,
2010, a worker requested administrative
reconsideration of the negative
determination regarding workers’
eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment
Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers
and former workers of the subject firm.
The determination was issued on
August 16, 2010 and the Notice of
determination was published in the
Federal Register on September 3, 2010
(75 FR 54187). The workers supply
information technology support services
and are not separately identifiable by
service supplied.
The negative determination was based
on the findings that the worker
separations, or threat of separation, were
not related to a shift in information
technology support service abroad or
increased imports of like or directly
competitive services. The investigation
also revealed that subject firm did not
supply a service to a firm that employed
a worker group eligible to apply for
TAA and that directly used the services
in the production of an article or supply
of service that was basis for the TAA
certification.
The worker, in the request for
reconsideration, disputes the
Department’s findings that the subject
firm did not shift to India the supply of
like or directly competitive services,
16:05 Oct 22, 2010
Conclusion
After careful review of the
application, I conclude that the claim is
of sufficient weight to justify
reconsideration of the U.S. Department
of Labor’s prior decision. The
application is, therefore, granted.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 7th day of
October 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
VerDate Mar<15>2010
and provides employment listings for
various information technology support
service positions at the subject firm’s
India facility as support documentation.
The Department has carefully
reviewed the request for reconsideration
and the existing record, and has
determined that the Department will
conduct further investigation to
determine if the workers meet the
eligibility requirements of the Trade Act
of 1974, as amended.
Jkt 223001
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–74,290]
Supermedia LLC, Formerally Known as
IDEARC Media LLC, Supermedia
Information Services LLC, Client Care
Group and Publishing Operations
Group, Including On-Site Leased
Workers of Advavtage (TAC),
RESPRCCONN, TATACONSSV, MODIS,
AMDOCS, and Database, Middleton,
MA; Notice of Affirmative
Determination Regarding Application
for Reconsideration
By application dated September 23,
2010, the petitioner requested
administrative reconsideration of the
negative determination regarding
workers’ eligibility to apply for Trade
Adjustment Assistance (TAA)
applicable to workers and former
workers of the subject firm. The
determination was issued on September
3, 2010 and the Notice of Determination
was published in the Federal Register
on September 21, 2010 (75 FR 57517).
The workers supply customer service in
support of the subject firm’s customers
and internal publishing support
services. Workers are separately
identifiable by service supplied.
The negative determination was based
on the findings there were no imports of
either customer service or publishing
support services by the subject firm. The
investigation also revealed that the
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
65515
subject firm did not produce an article
or supply a service that was used by a
firm with TAA-certified workers in the
production of an article or supply
service that was basis for TAACertification.
The request for reconsideration was
filed on behalf of a specific worker
group—workers of the Ad ProductionGraphics Division of SuperMedia,
Middleton, Massachusetts.
The request for reconsideration
alleges that because the workers of the
Ad Production-Graphics Division are
separately identifiable from workers in
other units of the subject firm,
information related to the Customer
Care Department and other units are not
relevant and should not be the basis for
denying the Ad Production-Graphics
Division workers’ eligibility to apply for
TAA. The request asserts that the
supply of services provided by the Ad
Production-Graphics Division shifted to
India.
The Department has carefully
reviewed the request for reconsideration
and the existing record, and has
determined that the Department will
conduct further investigation to
determine if the workers meet the
eligibility requirements of the Trade Act
of 1974, as amended.
Conclusion
After careful review of the
application, I conclude that the claim is
of sufficient weight to justify
reconsideration of the U.S. Department
of Labor’s prior decision. The
application is, therefore, granted.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 7th day of
October 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010–26905 Filed 10–22–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–73,301]
Shieldalloy Metallurgical Corporation,
A Subsidiary of AMG, Newfield, NJ;
Notice of Affirmative Determination
Regarding Application for
Reconsideration
By application dated August 29, 2010,
a worker requested administrative
reconsideration of the negative
determination regarding workers’
eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment
Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers
and former workers of the subject firm.
E:\FR\FM\25OCN1.SGM
25OCN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 205 (Monday, October 25, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65514-65515]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26895]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-70,110]
Columbia Forest Products, Inc., Presque Isle Division, Presque
Isle, ME; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for
Reconsideration
By application dated February 16, 2010, workers requested
administrative reconsideration of the negative determination regarding
workers' eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA)
applicable to workers and former workers of the subject firm. The
determination was issued on January 25, 2010, and the Notice of
Determination was published in the Federal Register on March 5, 2010
(75 FR 10323). The workers produce hardwood veneer.
The negative determination was based on the findings that, during
the relevant period, there was no increase in imports of articles like
or directly competitive with the hardwood veneer produced by the
subject firm, and no shift to/acquisition from a foreign country by the
subject firm of articles like or directly competitive with hardwood
veneer. The investigation also revealed that the subject firm did not
supply a component part to a firm that employed a worker group eligible
to apply for TAA and directly incorporated the component part into the
finished article that was the basis for the TAA certification.
The request for reconsideration asserts that the Department has
misinterpreted the statute to the detriment of the petitioning workers.
Specifically, the workers allege ``the Trade Act does not just look at
whether the subject firm increased imports, but that imports increased
in general.'' In support of the request for reconsideration, the
workers provided various articles regarding increased imports of like
or directly competitive articles from China, Canada, and other
countries.
The Department has carefully reviewed the request for
reconsideration and the existing record, and has determined that the
Department will
[[Page 65515]]
conduct further investigation to determine if the workers meet the
eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.
Conclusion
After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S.
Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore,
granted.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 7th day of October 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-26895 Filed 10-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
