Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield, Claim Management Services, Inc. Operations, a Division of Wellpoint, Inc., Green Bay, WI; Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration, 65525 [2010-26774]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 205 / Monday, October 25, 2010 / Notices
Fair’’; and ‘‘Calendars.’’ Other
documentation appeared under the
headings of ‘‘UAW–GM Golf
Tournaments’’ and ‘‘Community Service
& Charitable Activities.’’
The petitioner did not supply facts
not previously considered; nor provide
additional documentation indicating
that there was either (1) a mistake in the
determination of facts not previously
considered or (2) a misinterpretation of
facts or of the law justifying
reconsideration of the initial
determination.
After careful review of the request for
reconsideration, the Department
determines that 29 CFR 90.18(c) has not
been met.
Conclusion
After review of the application and
investigative findings, I conclude that
there has been no error or
misinterpretation of the law or of the
facts which would justify
reconsideration of the Department of
Labor’s prior decision. Accordingly, the
application is denied.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 7th day of
October 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010–26772 Filed 10–22–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–74,327]
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield, Claim
Management Services, Inc. Operations,
a Division of Wellpoint, Inc., Green
Bay, WI; Notice of Negative
Determination Regarding Application
for Reconsideration
By application dated August 26, 2010,
a petitioner requested administrative
reconsideration of the Department of
Labor’s negative determination
regarding eligibility to apply for Trade
Adjustment Assistance (TAA),
applicable to workers and former
workers of Anthem Blue Cross Blue
Shield, Claim Management Services,
Inc. Operations, a Division of Wellpoint,
Inc., Green Bay, Wisconsin (the subject
firm). The Notice of determination was
signed on August 16, 2010, and was
published in the Federal Register on
September 3, 2010 (75 FR 54187). The
workers supply claims processing
services and customer service functions,
and are not separately identifiable by
service.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:05 Oct 22, 2010
Jkt 223001
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c)
reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts
not previously considered that the
determination complained of was
erroneous;
(2) If it appears that the determination
complained of was based on a mistake
in the determination of facts not
previously considered; or
(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying
Officer, a mis-interpretation of facts or
of the law justified reconsideration of
the decision.
The negative determination of the
TAA petition filed on behalf of workers
at the subject firm was based on the
findings that there was neither a shift in
the supply of claims processing and
customer service functions to a foreign
country, nor imports of claims
processing and customer service
functions during the relevant period,
and that the subject firm is not a
supplier or downstream producer to a
firm that employed a worker group
eligible to apply for TAA.
In the request for reconsideration, the
petitioner stated that the workers of the
subject firm should be eligible for TAA
based on a shift to a foreign country.
The petitioner also noted that workers at
other locations of Anthem Blue Cross
Blue Shield are eligible to apply for
TAA, and urged the Department to ‘‘take
a look at the entire company and review
this again and you will find that they
have outsourced to [a foreign country].’’
The Department has confirmed that
workers at several other locations of
Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield are
eligible to apply for TAA on the basis
of a shift to a foreign country; however,
the workers at the subject facility supply
services that are distinctly different and
separate from those supplied by workers
at the other Anthem Blue Cross Blue
Shield locations, and the work that was
performed by Anthem Blue Cross Blue
Shield workers who are eligible to apply
for TAA based on a shift abroad had
never been performed at the subject
facility.
The petitioner did not supply facts
not previously considered; nor provide
additional documentation indicating
that there was either (1) a mistake in the
determination of facts not previously
considered or (2) a misinterpretation of
facts or of the law justifying
reconsideration of the initial
determination.
After careful review of the request for
reconsideration, the Department
determines that 29 CFR 90.18(c) has not
been met.
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
65525
Conclusion
After review of the application and
investigative findings, I conclude that
there has been no error or
misinterpretation of the law or of the
facts which would justify
reconsideration of the Department of
Labor’s prior decision. Accordingly, the
application is denied.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 7th day of
October 2010.
Michael W. Jaffe,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010–26774 Filed 10–22–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–74,063]
TRG Insurance Solutions, Beckley,
WV; Notice of Revised Determination
on Reconsideration
By application dated August 12, 2010
petitioners requested administrative
reconsideration of the Department’s
negative determination regarding the
eligibility of workers and former
workers of TRG Insurance Solutions,
Beckley, West Virginia, to apply for
Trade Adjustment Assistance. On
August 30, 2010, the Department issued
a Notice of Affirmative Determination
Regarding Application for
Reconsideration. The Department’s
Notice was published in the Federal
Register on September 13, 2010 (75 FR
55612). Workers at the subject firm are
engaged in employment related to the
supply of insurance call center services.
Based on the information obtained
during the reconsideration
investigation, the Department
determines that the subject firm shifted
to a foreign country a significant
proportion of the services like or
directly competitive with the insurance
call center services supplied by the
subject workers.
Conclusion
After careful review of the additional
facts obtained during the
reconsideration investigation, I
determine that workers of TRG
Insurance Solutions, Beckley, West
Virginia, who are engaged in
employment related to the supply of
insurance call center services, meet the
worker group certification criteria under
Section 222(a) of the Act, 19 U.S.C.
2272(a). In accordance with Section 223
E:\FR\FM\25OCN1.SGM
25OCN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 205 (Monday, October 25, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 65525]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26774]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-74,327]
Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield, Claim Management Services, Inc.
Operations, a Division of Wellpoint, Inc., Green Bay, WI; Notice of
Negative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration
By application dated August 26, 2010, a petitioner requested
administrative reconsideration of the Department of Labor's negative
determination regarding eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment
Assistance (TAA), applicable to workers and former workers of Anthem
Blue Cross Blue Shield, Claim Management Services, Inc. Operations, a
Division of Wellpoint, Inc., Green Bay, Wisconsin (the subject firm).
The Notice of determination was signed on August 16, 2010, and was
published in the Federal Register on September 3, 2010 (75 FR 54187).
The workers supply claims processing services and customer service
functions, and are not separately identifiable by service.
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered
that the determination complained of was erroneous;
(2) If it appears that the determination complained of was based on
a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or
(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a mis-
interpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of the
decision.
The negative determination of the TAA petition filed on behalf of
workers at the subject firm was based on the findings that there was
neither a shift in the supply of claims processing and customer service
functions to a foreign country, nor imports of claims processing and
customer service functions during the relevant period, and that the
subject firm is not a supplier or downstream producer to a firm that
employed a worker group eligible to apply for TAA.
In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner stated that the
workers of the subject firm should be eligible for TAA based on a shift
to a foreign country. The petitioner also noted that workers at other
locations of Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield are eligible to apply for
TAA, and urged the Department to ``take a look at the entire company
and review this again and you will find that they have outsourced to [a
foreign country].''
The Department has confirmed that workers at several other
locations of Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield are eligible to apply for
TAA on the basis of a shift to a foreign country; however, the workers
at the subject facility supply services that are distinctly different
and separate from those supplied by workers at the other Anthem Blue
Cross Blue Shield locations, and the work that was performed by Anthem
Blue Cross Blue Shield workers who are eligible to apply for TAA based
on a shift abroad had never been performed at the subject facility.
The petitioner did not supply facts not previously considered; nor
provide additional documentation indicating that there was either (1) a
mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered or (2)
a misinterpretation of facts or of the law justifying reconsideration
of the initial determination.
After careful review of the request for reconsideration, the
Department determines that 29 CFR 90.18(c) has not been met.
Conclusion
After review of the application and investigative findings, I
conclude that there has been no error or misinterpretation of the law
or of the facts which would justify reconsideration of the Department
of Labor's prior decision. Accordingly, the application is denied.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 7th day of October 2010.
Michael W. Jaffe,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-26774 Filed 10-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
