TRG Insurance Solutions, Beckley, WV; Notice of Revised Determination on Reconsideration, 65525-65526 [2010-26773]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 205 / Monday, October 25, 2010 / Notices Fair’’; and ‘‘Calendars.’’ Other documentation appeared under the headings of ‘‘UAW–GM Golf Tournaments’’ and ‘‘Community Service & Charitable Activities.’’ The petitioner did not supply facts not previously considered; nor provide additional documentation indicating that there was either (1) a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered or (2) a misinterpretation of facts or of the law justifying reconsideration of the initial determination. After careful review of the request for reconsideration, the Department determines that 29 CFR 90.18(c) has not been met. Conclusion After review of the application and investigative findings, I conclude that there has been no error or misinterpretation of the law or of the facts which would justify reconsideration of the Department of Labor’s prior decision. Accordingly, the application is denied. Signed in Washington, DC, this 7th day of October 2010. Del Min Amy Chen, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 2010–26772 Filed 10–22–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–74,327] emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield, Claim Management Services, Inc. Operations, a Division of Wellpoint, Inc., Green Bay, WI; Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration By application dated August 26, 2010, a petitioner requested administrative reconsideration of the Department of Labor’s negative determination regarding eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA), applicable to workers and former workers of Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield, Claim Management Services, Inc. Operations, a Division of Wellpoint, Inc., Green Bay, Wisconsin (the subject firm). The Notice of determination was signed on August 16, 2010, and was published in the Federal Register on September 3, 2010 (75 FR 54187). The workers supply claims processing services and customer service functions, and are not separately identifiable by service. VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:05 Oct 22, 2010 Jkt 223001 Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) reconsideration may be granted under the following circumstances: (1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered that the determination complained of was erroneous; (2) If it appears that the determination complained of was based on a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or (3) If in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a mis-interpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of the decision. The negative determination of the TAA petition filed on behalf of workers at the subject firm was based on the findings that there was neither a shift in the supply of claims processing and customer service functions to a foreign country, nor imports of claims processing and customer service functions during the relevant period, and that the subject firm is not a supplier or downstream producer to a firm that employed a worker group eligible to apply for TAA. In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner stated that the workers of the subject firm should be eligible for TAA based on a shift to a foreign country. The petitioner also noted that workers at other locations of Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield are eligible to apply for TAA, and urged the Department to ‘‘take a look at the entire company and review this again and you will find that they have outsourced to [a foreign country].’’ The Department has confirmed that workers at several other locations of Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield are eligible to apply for TAA on the basis of a shift to a foreign country; however, the workers at the subject facility supply services that are distinctly different and separate from those supplied by workers at the other Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield locations, and the work that was performed by Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield workers who are eligible to apply for TAA based on a shift abroad had never been performed at the subject facility. The petitioner did not supply facts not previously considered; nor provide additional documentation indicating that there was either (1) a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered or (2) a misinterpretation of facts or of the law justifying reconsideration of the initial determination. After careful review of the request for reconsideration, the Department determines that 29 CFR 90.18(c) has not been met. PO 00000 Frm 00080 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 65525 Conclusion After review of the application and investigative findings, I conclude that there has been no error or misinterpretation of the law or of the facts which would justify reconsideration of the Department of Labor’s prior decision. Accordingly, the application is denied. Signed in Washington, DC, this 7th day of October 2010. Michael W. Jaffe, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 2010–26774 Filed 10–22–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–74,063] TRG Insurance Solutions, Beckley, WV; Notice of Revised Determination on Reconsideration By application dated August 12, 2010 petitioners requested administrative reconsideration of the Department’s negative determination regarding the eligibility of workers and former workers of TRG Insurance Solutions, Beckley, West Virginia, to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance. On August 30, 2010, the Department issued a Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration. The Department’s Notice was published in the Federal Register on September 13, 2010 (75 FR 55612). Workers at the subject firm are engaged in employment related to the supply of insurance call center services. Based on the information obtained during the reconsideration investigation, the Department determines that the subject firm shifted to a foreign country a significant proportion of the services like or directly competitive with the insurance call center services supplied by the subject workers. Conclusion After careful review of the additional facts obtained during the reconsideration investigation, I determine that workers of TRG Insurance Solutions, Beckley, West Virginia, who are engaged in employment related to the supply of insurance call center services, meet the worker group certification criteria under Section 222(a) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2272(a). In accordance with Section 223 E:\FR\FM\25OCN1.SGM 25OCN1 65526 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 205 / Monday, October 25, 2010 / Notices of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2273, I make the following certification: All workers of TRG Insurance Solutions, Beckley, West Virginia, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after May 7, 2009, through two years from the date of this revised certification, and all workers in the group threatened with total or partial separation from employment on date of certification through two years from the date of certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. Signed in Washington, DC, this 6th day of October, 2010. Del Min Amy Chen, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 2010–26773 Filed 10–22–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–71,608] emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES Xilinx, Inc., Including On-Site Leased Workers of TEKsystems, Albuquerque, NM; Notice of Revised Determination on Reconsideration On January 25, 2010, the Department issued a Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration applicable to workers and former workers of Xilinx, Inc., Albuquerque, New Mexico (the subject firm). The Department’s Notice was published in the Federal Register on February 16, 2010 (75 FR 7031). The workers are engaged in employment related to the supply of internally used engineering services. In the request for reconsideration, workers alleged that the subject firm has shifted abroad the supply of services like and directly competitive with the internal-use engineering services supplied by the Albuquerque, New Mexico facility and provided documentation in support of the allegation. The new documentation included a February 29, 2008, advertisement for a product engineer/ senior product engineer for one offshore location of Xilinx, Inc.; and a job advertisement dated May 19, 2009, for integrated circuit test engineers and test equipment engineers for a Product and Test Engineering Department of a foreign Xilinx facility. During the reconsideration investigation, the Department carefully reviewed the new information and previously submitted information, and sought clarification from the subject firm. VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:05 Oct 22, 2010 Jkt 223001 Based on the information obtained during the reconsideration investigation, the Department determines that a significant proportion or number of workers at the subject firm was totally or partially separated, or threatened with such separation; that the subject firm shifted to a foreign country the supply of services like or directly competitive with the engineering services supplied by workers at the subject firm; and that the subject worker group includes on-site leased workers of TEKsystems. Conclusion After careful review of the additional facts obtained on reconsideration, I determine that workers of Xilinx, Inc., including on-site leased workers of TEKsystems, Albuquerque, New Mexico, who are engaged in employment related to the supply of internal-use engineering services, meet the worker group certification criteria under Section 222(a) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2272(a). In accordance with Section 223 of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2273, I make the following certification: All workers of Xilinx, Inc., including onsite leased workers of TEKsystems, Albuquerque, New Mexico, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after July 7, 2008, through two years from the date of this certification, and all workers in the group threatened with total or partial separation from employment on date of certification through two years from the date of certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. Signed in Washington, DC, this 7th day of October 2010. Del Min Amy Chen, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 2010–26771 Filed 10–22–10; 8:45 am] Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration. The Department’s Notice of affirmative determination was published in the Federal Register on July 1, 2010, 2010 (75 FR 38126). Workers at the subject firm are engaged in employment related to the production of fine yarns and specialty glass yarns. The worker group does not include on-site leased workers. Based on the information obtained during the reconsideration investigation, the Department determines that the subject firm shifted abroad a meaningful proportion of production of articles like or directly competitive with the fine yarns and/or specialty glass yarns produced by the workers. Conclusion After careful review of the additional facts obtained during the reconsideration investigation, I determine that workers of AGY Holding Corporation, Huntingdon, Pennsylvania, who are engaged in employment related to the production of fine yarns and specialty glass yarns, meet the worker group certification criteria under Section 222(a) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2272(a). In accordance with Section 223 of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2273, I make the following certification: All workers of AGY Holding Corporation, Huntingdon, Pennsylvania, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after June 4, 2008, through two years from the date of this revised certification, and all workers in the group threatened with total or partial separation from employment on date of certification through two years from the date of certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. Signed in Washington, DC, this 7th day of October, 2010. Del Min Amy Chen, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [FR Doc. 2010–26770 Filed 10–22–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P [TA–W–71,032] AGY Holding Corporation, Huntingdon, PA; Notice of Revised Determination on Reconsideration By application dated June 1, 2010 a union official requested administrative reconsideration of the Department’s negative determination regarding the eligibility of workers and former workers of AGY Holding Corporation, Huntingdon, Pennsylvania, to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA). On June 21, 2010, the Department issued a PO 00000 Frm 00081 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION Information Security Oversight Office National Industrial Security Program Policy Advisory Committee (NISPPAC) Information Security Oversight Office, National Archives and Records Administration. ACTION: Notice of meeting. AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\25OCN1.SGM 25OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 205 (Monday, October 25, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65525-65526]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26773]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-74,063]


TRG Insurance Solutions, Beckley, WV; Notice of Revised 
Determination on Reconsideration

    By application dated August 12, 2010 petitioners requested 
administrative reconsideration of the Department's negative 
determination regarding the eligibility of workers and former workers 
of TRG Insurance Solutions, Beckley, West Virginia, to apply for Trade 
Adjustment Assistance. On August 30, 2010, the Department issued a 
Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for 
Reconsideration. The Department's Notice was published in the Federal 
Register on September 13, 2010 (75 FR 55612). Workers at the subject 
firm are engaged in employment related to the supply of insurance call 
center services.
    Based on the information obtained during the reconsideration 
investigation, the Department determines that the subject firm shifted 
to a foreign country a significant proportion of the services like or 
directly competitive with the insurance call center services supplied 
by the subject workers.

Conclusion

    After careful review of the additional facts obtained during the 
reconsideration investigation, I determine that workers of TRG 
Insurance Solutions, Beckley, West Virginia, who are engaged in 
employment related to the supply of insurance call center services, 
meet the worker group certification criteria under Section 222(a) of 
the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2272(a). In accordance with Section 223

[[Page 65526]]

of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2273, I make the following certification:

    All workers of TRG Insurance Solutions, Beckley, West Virginia, 
who became totally or partially separated from employment on or 
after May 7, 2009, through two years from the date of this revised 
certification, and all workers in the group threatened with total or 
partial separation from employment on date of certification through 
two years from the date of certification, are eligible to apply for 
adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act 
of 1974, as amended.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 6th day of October, 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-26773 Filed 10-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P