TRG Insurance Solutions, Beckley, WV; Notice of Revised Determination on Reconsideration, 65525-65526 [2010-26773]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 205 / Monday, October 25, 2010 / Notices
Fair’’; and ‘‘Calendars.’’ Other
documentation appeared under the
headings of ‘‘UAW–GM Golf
Tournaments’’ and ‘‘Community Service
& Charitable Activities.’’
The petitioner did not supply facts
not previously considered; nor provide
additional documentation indicating
that there was either (1) a mistake in the
determination of facts not previously
considered or (2) a misinterpretation of
facts or of the law justifying
reconsideration of the initial
determination.
After careful review of the request for
reconsideration, the Department
determines that 29 CFR 90.18(c) has not
been met.
Conclusion
After review of the application and
investigative findings, I conclude that
there has been no error or
misinterpretation of the law or of the
facts which would justify
reconsideration of the Department of
Labor’s prior decision. Accordingly, the
application is denied.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 7th day of
October 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010–26772 Filed 10–22–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–74,327]
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield, Claim
Management Services, Inc. Operations,
a Division of Wellpoint, Inc., Green
Bay, WI; Notice of Negative
Determination Regarding Application
for Reconsideration
By application dated August 26, 2010,
a petitioner requested administrative
reconsideration of the Department of
Labor’s negative determination
regarding eligibility to apply for Trade
Adjustment Assistance (TAA),
applicable to workers and former
workers of Anthem Blue Cross Blue
Shield, Claim Management Services,
Inc. Operations, a Division of Wellpoint,
Inc., Green Bay, Wisconsin (the subject
firm). The Notice of determination was
signed on August 16, 2010, and was
published in the Federal Register on
September 3, 2010 (75 FR 54187). The
workers supply claims processing
services and customer service functions,
and are not separately identifiable by
service.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:05 Oct 22, 2010
Jkt 223001
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c)
reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts
not previously considered that the
determination complained of was
erroneous;
(2) If it appears that the determination
complained of was based on a mistake
in the determination of facts not
previously considered; or
(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying
Officer, a mis-interpretation of facts or
of the law justified reconsideration of
the decision.
The negative determination of the
TAA petition filed on behalf of workers
at the subject firm was based on the
findings that there was neither a shift in
the supply of claims processing and
customer service functions to a foreign
country, nor imports of claims
processing and customer service
functions during the relevant period,
and that the subject firm is not a
supplier or downstream producer to a
firm that employed a worker group
eligible to apply for TAA.
In the request for reconsideration, the
petitioner stated that the workers of the
subject firm should be eligible for TAA
based on a shift to a foreign country.
The petitioner also noted that workers at
other locations of Anthem Blue Cross
Blue Shield are eligible to apply for
TAA, and urged the Department to ‘‘take
a look at the entire company and review
this again and you will find that they
have outsourced to [a foreign country].’’
The Department has confirmed that
workers at several other locations of
Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield are
eligible to apply for TAA on the basis
of a shift to a foreign country; however,
the workers at the subject facility supply
services that are distinctly different and
separate from those supplied by workers
at the other Anthem Blue Cross Blue
Shield locations, and the work that was
performed by Anthem Blue Cross Blue
Shield workers who are eligible to apply
for TAA based on a shift abroad had
never been performed at the subject
facility.
The petitioner did not supply facts
not previously considered; nor provide
additional documentation indicating
that there was either (1) a mistake in the
determination of facts not previously
considered or (2) a misinterpretation of
facts or of the law justifying
reconsideration of the initial
determination.
After careful review of the request for
reconsideration, the Department
determines that 29 CFR 90.18(c) has not
been met.
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
65525
Conclusion
After review of the application and
investigative findings, I conclude that
there has been no error or
misinterpretation of the law or of the
facts which would justify
reconsideration of the Department of
Labor’s prior decision. Accordingly, the
application is denied.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 7th day of
October 2010.
Michael W. Jaffe,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010–26774 Filed 10–22–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–74,063]
TRG Insurance Solutions, Beckley,
WV; Notice of Revised Determination
on Reconsideration
By application dated August 12, 2010
petitioners requested administrative
reconsideration of the Department’s
negative determination regarding the
eligibility of workers and former
workers of TRG Insurance Solutions,
Beckley, West Virginia, to apply for
Trade Adjustment Assistance. On
August 30, 2010, the Department issued
a Notice of Affirmative Determination
Regarding Application for
Reconsideration. The Department’s
Notice was published in the Federal
Register on September 13, 2010 (75 FR
55612). Workers at the subject firm are
engaged in employment related to the
supply of insurance call center services.
Based on the information obtained
during the reconsideration
investigation, the Department
determines that the subject firm shifted
to a foreign country a significant
proportion of the services like or
directly competitive with the insurance
call center services supplied by the
subject workers.
Conclusion
After careful review of the additional
facts obtained during the
reconsideration investigation, I
determine that workers of TRG
Insurance Solutions, Beckley, West
Virginia, who are engaged in
employment related to the supply of
insurance call center services, meet the
worker group certification criteria under
Section 222(a) of the Act, 19 U.S.C.
2272(a). In accordance with Section 223
E:\FR\FM\25OCN1.SGM
25OCN1
65526
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 205 / Monday, October 25, 2010 / Notices
of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2273, I make the
following certification:
All workers of TRG Insurance Solutions,
Beckley, West Virginia, who became totally
or partially separated from employment on or
after May 7, 2009, through two years from the
date of this revised certification, and all
workers in the group threatened with total or
partial separation from employment on date
of certification through two years from the
date of certification, are eligible to apply for
adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of
Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 6th day of
October, 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010–26773 Filed 10–22–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–71,608]
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Xilinx, Inc., Including On-Site Leased
Workers of TEKsystems, Albuquerque,
NM; Notice of Revised Determination
on Reconsideration
On January 25, 2010, the Department
issued a Notice of Affirmative
Determination Regarding Application
for Reconsideration applicable to
workers and former workers of Xilinx,
Inc., Albuquerque, New Mexico (the
subject firm). The Department’s Notice
was published in the Federal Register
on February 16, 2010 (75 FR 7031). The
workers are engaged in employment
related to the supply of internally used
engineering services.
In the request for reconsideration,
workers alleged that the subject firm has
shifted abroad the supply of services
like and directly competitive with the
internal-use engineering services
supplied by the Albuquerque, New
Mexico facility and provided
documentation in support of the
allegation. The new documentation
included a February 29, 2008,
advertisement for a product engineer/
senior product engineer for one offshore
location of Xilinx, Inc.; and a job
advertisement dated May 19, 2009, for
integrated circuit test engineers and test
equipment engineers for a Product and
Test Engineering Department of a
foreign Xilinx facility.
During the reconsideration
investigation, the Department carefully
reviewed the new information and
previously submitted information, and
sought clarification from the subject
firm.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:05 Oct 22, 2010
Jkt 223001
Based on the information obtained
during the reconsideration
investigation, the Department
determines that a significant proportion
or number of workers at the subject firm
was totally or partially separated, or
threatened with such separation; that
the subject firm shifted to a foreign
country the supply of services like or
directly competitive with the
engineering services supplied by
workers at the subject firm; and that the
subject worker group includes on-site
leased workers of TEKsystems.
Conclusion
After careful review of the additional
facts obtained on reconsideration, I
determine that workers of Xilinx, Inc.,
including on-site leased workers of
TEKsystems, Albuquerque, New
Mexico, who are engaged in
employment related to the supply of
internal-use engineering services, meet
the worker group certification criteria
under Section 222(a) of the Act, 19
U.S.C. 2272(a). In accordance with
Section 223 of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2273,
I make the following certification:
All workers of Xilinx, Inc., including onsite leased workers of TEKsystems,
Albuquerque, New Mexico, who became
totally or partially separated from
employment on or after July 7, 2008, through
two years from the date of this certification,
and all workers in the group threatened with
total or partial separation from employment
on date of certification through two years
from the date of certification, are eligible to
apply for adjustment assistance under
Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974,
as amended.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 7th day of
October 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010–26771 Filed 10–22–10; 8:45 am]
Notice of Affirmative Determination
Regarding Application for
Reconsideration. The Department’s
Notice of affirmative determination was
published in the Federal Register on
July 1, 2010, 2010 (75 FR 38126).
Workers at the subject firm are
engaged in employment related to the
production of fine yarns and specialty
glass yarns. The worker group does not
include on-site leased workers.
Based on the information obtained
during the reconsideration
investigation, the Department
determines that the subject firm shifted
abroad a meaningful proportion of
production of articles like or directly
competitive with the fine yarns and/or
specialty glass yarns produced by the
workers.
Conclusion
After careful review of the additional
facts obtained during the
reconsideration investigation, I
determine that workers of AGY Holding
Corporation, Huntingdon, Pennsylvania,
who are engaged in employment related
to the production of fine yarns and
specialty glass yarns, meet the worker
group certification criteria under
Section 222(a) of the Act, 19 U.S.C.
2272(a). In accordance with Section 223
of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2273, I make the
following certification:
All workers of AGY Holding Corporation,
Huntingdon, Pennsylvania, who became
totally or partially separated from
employment on or after June 4, 2008, through
two years from the date of this revised
certification, and all workers in the group
threatened with total or partial separation
from employment on date of certification
through two years from the date of
certification, are eligible to apply for
adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of
Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 7th day of
October, 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[FR Doc. 2010–26770 Filed 10–22–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
[TA–W–71,032]
AGY Holding Corporation, Huntingdon,
PA; Notice of Revised Determination
on Reconsideration
By application dated June 1, 2010 a
union official requested administrative
reconsideration of the Department’s
negative determination regarding the
eligibility of workers and former
workers of AGY Holding Corporation,
Huntingdon, Pennsylvania, to apply for
Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA). On
June 21, 2010, the Department issued a
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS
ADMINISTRATION
Information Security Oversight Office
National Industrial Security Program
Policy Advisory Committee (NISPPAC)
Information Security Oversight
Office, National Archives and Records
Administration.
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\25OCN1.SGM
25OCN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 205 (Monday, October 25, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65525-65526]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26773]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-74,063]
TRG Insurance Solutions, Beckley, WV; Notice of Revised
Determination on Reconsideration
By application dated August 12, 2010 petitioners requested
administrative reconsideration of the Department's negative
determination regarding the eligibility of workers and former workers
of TRG Insurance Solutions, Beckley, West Virginia, to apply for Trade
Adjustment Assistance. On August 30, 2010, the Department issued a
Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for
Reconsideration. The Department's Notice was published in the Federal
Register on September 13, 2010 (75 FR 55612). Workers at the subject
firm are engaged in employment related to the supply of insurance call
center services.
Based on the information obtained during the reconsideration
investigation, the Department determines that the subject firm shifted
to a foreign country a significant proportion of the services like or
directly competitive with the insurance call center services supplied
by the subject workers.
Conclusion
After careful review of the additional facts obtained during the
reconsideration investigation, I determine that workers of TRG
Insurance Solutions, Beckley, West Virginia, who are engaged in
employment related to the supply of insurance call center services,
meet the worker group certification criteria under Section 222(a) of
the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2272(a). In accordance with Section 223
[[Page 65526]]
of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2273, I make the following certification:
All workers of TRG Insurance Solutions, Beckley, West Virginia,
who became totally or partially separated from employment on or
after May 7, 2009, through two years from the date of this revised
certification, and all workers in the group threatened with total or
partial separation from employment on date of certification through
two years from the date of certification, are eligible to apply for
adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act
of 1974, as amended.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 6th day of October, 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-26773 Filed 10-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
