Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance, 65518-65521 [2010-26768]

Download as PDF 65518 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 205 / Monday, October 25, 2010 / Notices with this final notice to grant CSA’s expansion application. All public documents pertaining to the CSA application are available for review by contacting the Docket Office, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Room N–2625, Washington, DC 20210. These materials also are available online at https://www.regulations.gov under Docket No. OSHA–2006–0042. Final Decision and Order NRTL Program staff examined CSA’s application, the comparability analysis, and other pertinent information. Based on this examination and the analysis, OSHA finds that CSA meets the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.7 for expansion of its recognition, subject to the limitation and conditions specified below. Pursuant to the authority in 29 CFR 1910.7, OSHA hereby expands the recognition of CSA, subject to this limitation and these conditions. emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES Limitation OSHA limits the expansion of CSA’s recognition to testing and certification of products for demonstration of conformance to the following test standards, each of which OSHA determines is an appropriate test standard, within the meaning of 29 CFR 1910.7(c): UL 498A Current Taps and Adapters UL 515 Electrical Resistance Heat Tracing for Commercial and Industrial Applications UL 1673 Electric Space Heating Cables UL 1977 Component Connectors for Use in Data, Signal, Control and Power Applications The designations and titles of these test standards were current at the time of the preparation of this notice. OSHA’s recognition of any NRTL for a particular test standard is limited to equipment or materials (i.e., products) for which OSHA standards require third-party testing and certification before use in the workplace. Consequently, if a test standard also covers any product for which OSHA does not require such testing and certification, an NRTL’s scope of recognition does not include that product. The American National Standards Institute (ANSI) may approve the test standards listed above as an American National Standard. However, for convenience, we may use the designation of the standards-developing organization for the standard as opposed to the ANSI designation. Under the NRTL Program’s policy (see OSHA VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:05 Oct 22, 2010 Jkt 223001 Instruction CPL 1–0.3, Appendix C, paragraph XIV), any NRTL recognized for a particular test standard may use either the proprietary version of the test standard or the ANSI version of that standard. Contact ANSI to determine whether a test standard is currently ANSI-approved. Signed at Washington, DC, on October 20, 2010. David Michaels, Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health. Conditions DEPARTMENT OF LABOR CSA also must abide by the following conditions of the recognition, in addition to those conditions already required by 29 CFR 1910.7: 1. CSA must allow access to its facilities and records to ascertain continuing compliance with the terms of its recognition, and to perform investigations as OSHA deems necessary; 2. If CSA has reason to doubt the efficacy of any test standard it is using under this program, it must promptly inform the test standard-developing organization of this concern, and provide that organization with appropriate relevant information upon which its concern is based; 3. CSA must not engage in, or permit others to engage in, any misrepresentation of the scope or conditions of its recognition. As part of this condition, CSA agrees that it will allow no representation that it is either a recognized or an accredited Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory (NRTL) without clearly indicating the specific equipment or material to which this recognition applies and that its recognition is limited to certain products; 4. CSA must inform OSHA as soon as possible, in writing, of any change of ownership, facilities, or key personnel, and of any major changes in its operations as an NRTL, including details of these changes; 5. CSA will meet all the terms of its recognition and will always comply with all OSHA policies pertaining to this recognition; and 6. CSA will continue to meet the requirements for recognition in all areas to which this recognition applies. Authority and Signature David Michaels, PhD, MPH, Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210, directed the preparation of this notice. Accordingly, the Agency is issuing this notice pursuant to Sections 6(b) and 8(g) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (29 U.S.C. 655 and 657), Secretary of Labor’s Order No. 4–2010 (75 FR 55355), and 29 CFR part 1911. PO 00000 Frm 00073 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 [FR Doc. 2010–26887 Filed 10–22–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–26–P Employment and Training Administration Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers by (TA–W) number issued during the period of October 4, 2010 through October 8, 2010. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met. I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the following must be satisfied: (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased absolutely; and (3) One of the following must be satisfied: (A) Imports of articles or services like or directly competitive with articles produced or services supplied by such firm have increased; (B) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are directly incorporated, have increased; (C) Imports of articles directly incorporating one or more component parts produced outside the United States that are like or directly competitive with imports of articles incorporating one or more component parts produced by such firm have increased; (D) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles which are produced directly using services supplied by such firm, have increased; and (4) The increase in imports contributed importantly to such E:\FR\FM\25OCN1.SGM 25OCN1 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 205 / Monday, October 25, 2010 / Notices workers’ separation or threat of separation and to the decline in the sales or production of such firm; or II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the following must be satisfied: (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) One of the following must be satisfied: (A) There has been a shift by the workers’ firm to a foreign country in the production of articles or supply of services like or directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; (B) There has been an acquisition from a foreign country by the workers’ firm of articles/services that are like or directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; and (3) The shift/acquisition contributed importantly to the workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected workers in public agencies and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must be met. (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the public agency have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The public agency has acquired from a foreign country services like or directly competitive with services which are supplied by such agency; and (3) The acquisition of services contributed importantly to such workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected secondary workers of a firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(c) of the Act must be met. (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers’ firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The workers’ firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, and such supply or production is related to the article or service that was the basis for such certification; and (3) Either— (A) The workers’ firm is a supplier and the component parts it supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the workers’ firm; or (B) A loss of business by the workers’ firm with the firm described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected workers in firms identified by the International Trade Commission and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(f) of the Act must be met. (1) The workers’ firm is publicly identified by name by the International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an investigation resulting in— 65519 (A) An affirmative determination of serious injury or threat thereof under section 202(b)(1); (B) An affirmative determination of market disruption or threat thereof under section 421(b)(1); or (C) An affirmative final determination of material injury or threat thereof under section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A)); (2) The petition is filed during the 1year period beginning on the date on which— (A) A summary of the report submitted to the President by the International Trade Commission under section 202(f)(1) with respect to the affirmative determination described in paragraph (1)(A) is published in the Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); or (B) Notice of an affirmative determination described in subparagraph (1) is published in the Federal Register; and (3) The workers have become totally or partially separated from the workers’ firm within— (A) The 1-year period described in paragraph (2); or (B) Notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the 1-year period preceding the 1-year period described in paragraph (2). Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance The following certifications have been issued. The date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determination. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 73,568 .......... 73,851 .......... Scioto Plastics, LLC .............................................................................. Mueller Steam Specialty, Leased Workers from Staffing Alliance, Two Hawk Employment Agency. Moore Flame Cutting Co ...................................................................... Briggs and Stratton Corp., EPPG Div., Adecco ................................... Cold Spring Granite Company, Granite Fabrication Division ............... Sitel Operating Corporation, Sitel Worldwide Corporation ................... Invensys Rail Corp., Safetran Systems Corporation, Ultimate Staffing Reiman Media Group, LLC, Premedia Department ............................. Franklin Furnace, OH ................... St. Pauls, NC ................................ February 24, 2009. April 5, 2009. Sterling Heights, MI ...................... Murray, KY .................................... Cold Spring, MN ........................... Winfield, AL ................................... Rancho Cucamonga, CA .............. Greendale, WI ............................... April 30, 2009. May 22, 2009. June 2, 2009. June 2, 2009. June 17, 2009. August 18, 2009. emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES 74,091 74,145 74,181 74,238 74,285 74,542 .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W No. Subject firm Location 73,548 ................... R.G. Barry Corporation, Corporate Headquarters, Creative Group, Accounts, etc. Pickerington, OH .. VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:05 Oct 22, 2010 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00074 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\25OCN1.SGM 25OCN1 Impact date February 12, 2009. 65520 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 205 / Monday, October 25, 2010 / Notices TA–W No. Subject firm 73,814 ................... Triumph Aerostructures, LLC, Vought Aircraft, Vought Commercial, Johnson, etc. VMware, IT Applications Group, Subsidiary of EMC ........................................ VMware, Global Support Services Team, Subsidiary of EMC ......................... ExxonMobil Chemical Company, Films Business Div., Manpower .................. SuperMedia, LLC, Idearc Media, Publishing Operation, TCS, ASEC, OKS .... Phoenix Technology Center, Mattel, Inc., Leased Workers of Paradigm ........ Husqvarna Outdoor Products, Inc ..................................................................... International Business Machines (IBM), Division 7T, Enterprise Systems Development. Mattel, Inc., Infrastructure Services, Pro Unlimited, Inc ................................... AstenJohnson, Inc., Leased Workers from SPB and Associates ..................... Harris Corporation, Broadcast Communications Division ................................. HAVI Logistics, North America, Havi Group, LP, Leased Workers from Office Team. United Solar Ovonic .......................................................................................... Solo Cup Operating Corporation, Solo Cup Company, Pennmac Staffing ...... Whirlpool Corporation, Career Solutions, TEC Staffing .................................... Schneider Electric USA, Volt Workforce Solutions ........................................... Covidien, Accounts Payable Department, Kelly Services ................................ AMB Property, L.P., Property Accounting Group ............................................. Di-Pro, Inc., Bendix-Spicer/Knorr-Bremse, Select ............................................ Covidien, Tyco Healthcare Group LP, Medical Supplies, Kelly Serv ............... Aegon USA, dba Transamerica Life Insurance Company ................................ 74,150 ................... 74,150A ................ 74,325 ................... 74,359 ................... 74,379 ................... 74,418 ................... 74,426 ................... 74,427 74,514 74,539 74,547 ................... ................... ................... ................... 74,558 74,559 74,593 74,611 74,612 74,620 74,628 74,642 74,665 ................... ................... ................... ................... ................... ................... ................... ................... ................... The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(c) (supplier to a firm whose workers Location Impact date Grand Prairie, TX March 26, 2009. Palo Alto, CA ........ Palo Alto, CA ........ Macedon, NY ........ Everett, WA .......... Phoenix, AZ .......... Texarkana, TX ...... Rochester, MN ..... May 24, 2009. May 24, 2009. June 25, 2009. July 1, 2009. July 12, 2009. June 30, 2009. July 22, 2009. El Segundo, CA .... Clinton, SC ........... Chesapeake, VA .. Davis, CA ............. July 20, 2009. August 3, 2009. August 18, 2009. August 11, 2009. Auburn Hills, MI .... Springfield, MO ..... Fort Smith, AR ...... Knightdale, NC ..... Mansfield, MA ....... Boston, MA ........... Fresno, CA ........... Watertown, NY ..... Chattanooga, TN .. August 23, 2009. August 24, 2009. October 2, 2010. August 27, 2009. September 8, 2009. September 10, 2009. September 9, 2009. September 17, 2010. September 20, 2009. are certified eligible to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W No. Subject firm Location 74,436 .......... Faurecia Automotive Seating, Troy Technical Center, Reliance One, Trialon, EHD, etc. Troy, MI ......................................... The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(c) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are certified eligible to Impact date July 6, 2009. apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W No. Subject firm Location 73,913 .......... VersaLogic Corporation, Leased Workers from Barrett Business Services and Adecco. Hanesbrands, Inc., Annapolis Drive Facility .......................................... Eugene, OR ................................... April 12, 2009. Winston-Salem, NC ....................... June 18, 2009. 74,305 .......... Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met for the reasons specified. The investigation revealed that the criterion under paragraph (a)(1), or TA–W No. V and S Detroit Galvanizing, LLC, Voigt and Schweitzer, LLC Frost Controls, Inc ................................................................................. The investigation revealed that the criteria under paragraphs (a)(2)(A)(i) emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES (b)(1), or (c)(1) (employment decline or threat of separation) of section 222 has not been met. Subject firm 73,773 .......... 74,623 .......... Location Vaughan Furniture Company ................................................................ services to a foreign country) of section 222 have not been met. Subject firm 74,551 .......... The investigation revealed that the criteria under paragraphs (a)(2)(A) VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:05 Oct 22, 2010 Jkt 223001 Location Frm 00075 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Impact date Galax, VA (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services to a foreign PO 00000 Impact date Redford, MI Smithfield, RI (decline in sales or production, or both) and (a)(2)(B) (shift in production or TA–W No. Impact date country) of section 222 have not been met. E:\FR\FM\25OCN1.SGM 25OCN1 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 205 / Monday, October 25, 2010 / Notices TA–W No. Subject firm 72,493 .......... 74,291 .......... Ananke, Inc ............................................................................................ South Central Workforce Investment Board, Ozark Action, Inc ............ Determinations Terminating Investigations of Petitions for Worker Adjustment Assistance Location TA–W No. 3M IMTEC .............................................................................................. Orbotech, Inc., A workers working on-site at TTM Technologies ......... The following determinations terminating investigations were issued in cases where these petitions were not filed in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 90.11. Every petition filed by workers must be signed Location Computer Sciences Corporation (CSC) ................................................ Hallmark Cards, Inc ............................................................................... therefore, may not be part of a petitioning worker group. For one or more of these reasons, these petitions were deemed invalid. Subject firm 74,488 .......... 74,496 .......... The following determinations terminating investigations were issued because the petitioning groups of Location WellPoint, Inc., Doing business as Blue Cross/Blue Shield ................. no purpose since the petitioning group of workers cannot be covered by more than one certification at a time. Subject firm 74,103 .......... I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued during the period of October 4, 2010 through October 8, 2010. Copies of these determinations may be requested under the Freedom of Information Act. Requests may be submitted by fax, courier services, or mail to FOIA Disclosure Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance (ETA), U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 or tofoiarequest@dol.gov. These determinations also are available on the Department’s Web site at https:// www.doleta.gov/tradeact under the searchable listing of determinations. Dated: October 15, 2010. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 2010–26768 Filed 10–22–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:05 Oct 22, 2010 Jkt 223001 Impact date Newark, DE Kansas City, MO workers are covered by active certifications. Consequently, further investigation in these cases would serve TA–W No. Impact date Ardmore, OK Redmond, WA by at least three individuals of the petitioning worker group. Petitioners separated more than one year prior to the date of the petition cannot be covered under a certification of a petition under Section 223(b), and TA–W No. emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES The following determinations terminating investigations were issued because the petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Subject firm 74,544 .......... 74,616 .......... Impact date Providence, RI West Plains, MO on the Department’s Web site, as required by Section 221 of the Act (19 U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated investigations of these petitions. After notice of the petitions was published in the Federal Register and 65521 Location Impact date Denver, CO Occupational Safety and Health Administration Avenue, NW., Room N–3655, Washington, DC 20210, or phone (202) 693–2110. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: [Docket No. OSHA–2007–0041] Notice of Final Decision FM Approvals; Expansion of Recognition The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) hereby gives notice that it is expanding the recognition of FM Approvals LLC (FM) as a Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory (NRTL). FM’s expansion covers the use of additional test standards. OSHA’s current scope of recognition for FM may be found in the following informational Web page: https://www.osha.gov/dts/otpca/nrtl/ fm.html. OSHA recognition of an NRTL signifies that the organization meets the legal requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.7. Recognition is an acknowledgment that the organization can perform independent safety testing and certification of the specific products covered within its scope of recognition, and is not a delegation or grant of government authority. As a result of DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: This notice announces the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s final decision expanding the recognition of FM Approvals LLC as a Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory under 29 CFR 1910.7. DATES: The expansion of recognition becomes effective on October 25, 2010. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: MaryAnn Garrahan, Director, Office of Technical Programs and Coordination Activities, NRTL Program, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00076 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\25OCN1.SGM 25OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 205 (Monday, October 25, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65518-65521]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26768]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment
assistance for workers by (TA-W) number issued during the period of
October 4, 2010 through October 8, 2010.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to
apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility
requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the following must be satisfied:
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) The sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased
absolutely; and
(3) One of the following must be satisfied:
(A) Imports of articles or services like or directly competitive
with articles produced or services supplied by such firm have
increased;
(B) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles
into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are
directly incorporated, have increased;
(C) Imports of articles directly incorporating one or more
component parts produced outside the United States that are like or
directly competitive with imports of articles incorporating one or more
component parts produced by such firm have increased;
(D) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles
which are produced directly using services supplied by such firm, have
increased; and
(4) The increase in imports contributed importantly to such

[[Page 65519]]

workers' separation or threat of separation and to the decline in the
sales or production of such firm; or
II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the following must be satisfied:
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) One of the following must be satisfied:
(A) There has been a shift by the workers' firm to a foreign
country in the production of articles or supply of services like or
directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm;
(B) There has been an acquisition from a foreign country by the
workers' firm of articles/services that are like or directly
competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm; and
(3) The shift/acquisition contributed importantly to the workers'
separation or threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in public agencies and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must
be met.
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the public
agency have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to
become totally or partially separated;
(2) The public agency has acquired from a foreign country services
like or directly competitive with services which are supplied by such
agency; and
(3) The acquisition of services contributed importantly to such
workers' separation or threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected secondary workers of a firm and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(c) of the Act must
be met.
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) The workers' firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a
firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of
eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, and such supply or
production is related to the article or service that was the basis for
such certification; and
(3) Either--
(A) The workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it
supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least
20 percent of the production or sales of the workers' firm; or
(B) A loss of business by the workers' firm with the firm described
in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers' separation or
threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in firms identified by the International Trade
Commission and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply
for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility
requirements of Section 222(f) of the Act must be met.
(1) The workers' firm is publicly identified by name by the
International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an
investigation resulting in--
(A) An affirmative determination of serious injury or threat
thereof under section 202(b)(1);
(B) An affirmative determination of market disruption or threat
thereof under section 421(b)(1); or
(C) An affirmative final determination of material injury or threat
thereof under section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A));
(2) The petition is filed during the 1-year period beginning on the
date on which--
(A) A summary of the report submitted to the President by the
International Trade Commission under section 202(f)(1) with respect to
the affirmative determination described in paragraph (1)(A) is
published in the Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); or
(B) Notice of an affirmative determination described in
subparagraph (1) is published in the Federal Register; and
(3) The workers have become totally or partially separated from the
workers' firm within--
(A) The 1-year period described in paragraph (2); or
(B) Notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the 1-year period preceding
the 1-year period described in paragraph (2).

Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance

The following certifications have been issued. The date following
the company name and location of each determination references the
impact date for all workers of such determination.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been
met.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
73,568.................. Scioto Plastics, LLC........ Franklin Furnace, OH... February 24, 2009.
73,851.................. Mueller Steam Specialty, St. Pauls, NC.......... April 5, 2009.
Leased Workers from
Staffing Alliance, Two Hawk
Employment Agency.
74,091.................. Moore Flame Cutting Co...... Sterling Heights, MI... April 30, 2009.
74,145.................. Briggs and Stratton Corp., Murray, KY............. May 22, 2009.
EPPG Div., Adecco.
74,181.................. Cold Spring Granite Company, Cold Spring, MN........ June 2, 2009.
Granite Fabrication
Division.
74,238.................. Sitel Operating Corporation, Winfield, AL........... June 2, 2009.
Sitel Worldwide Corporation.
74,285.................. Invensys Rail Corp., Rancho Cucamonga, CA... June 17, 2009.
Safetran Systems
Corporation, Ultimate
Staffing.
74,542.................. Reiman Media Group, LLC, Greendale, WI.......... August 18, 2009.
Premedia Department.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services) of the Trade Act
have been met.

[[Page 65520]]

73,814........................... Triumph Aerostructures, Grand Prairie, TX.. March 26, 2009.
LLC, Vought Aircraft,
Vought Commercial,
Johnson, etc.
74,150........................... VMware, IT Applications Palo Alto, CA...... May 24, 2009.
Group, Subsidiary of
EMC.
74,150A.......................... VMware, Global Support Palo Alto, CA...... May 24, 2009.
Services Team,
Subsidiary of EMC.
74,325........................... ExxonMobil Chemical Macedon, NY........ June 25, 2009.
Company, Films Business
Div., Manpower.
74,359........................... SuperMedia, LLC, Idearc Everett, WA........ July 1, 2009.
Media, Publishing
Operation, TCS, ASEC,
OKS.
74,379........................... Phoenix Technology Phoenix, AZ........ July 12, 2009.
Center, Mattel, Inc.,
Leased Workers of
Paradigm.
74,418........................... Husqvarna Outdoor Texarkana, TX...... June 30, 2009.
Products, Inc.
74,426........................... International Business Rochester, MN...... July 22, 2009.
Machines (IBM),
Division 7T, Enterprise
Systems Development.
74,427........................... Mattel, Inc., El Segundo, CA..... July 20, 2009.
Infrastructure
Services, Pro
Unlimited, Inc.
74,514........................... AstenJohnson, Inc., Clinton, SC........ August 3, 2009.
Leased Workers from SPB
and Associates.
74,539........................... Harris Corporation, Chesapeake, VA..... August 18, 2009.
Broadcast
Communications Division.
74,547........................... HAVI Logistics, North Davis, CA.......... August 11, 2009.
America, Havi Group,
LP, Leased Workers from
Office Team.
74,558........................... United Solar Ovonic..... Auburn Hills, MI... August 23, 2009.
74,559........................... Solo Cup Operating Springfield, MO.... August 24, 2009.
Corporation, Solo Cup
Company, Pennmac
Staffing.
74,593........................... Whirlpool Corporation, Fort Smith, AR..... October 2, 2010.
Career Solutions, TEC
Staffing.
74,611........................... Schneider Electric USA, Knightdale, NC..... August 27, 2009.
Volt Workforce
Solutions.
74,612........................... Covidien, Accounts Mansfield, MA...... September 8, 2009.
Payable Department,
Kelly Services.
74,620........................... AMB Property, L.P., Boston, MA......... September 10, 2009.
Property Accounting
Group.
74,628........................... Di-Pro, Inc., Bendix- Fresno, CA......... September 9, 2009.
Spicer/Knorr-Bremse,
Select.
74,642........................... Covidien, Tyco Watertown, NY...... September 17, 2010.
Healthcare Group LP,
Medical Supplies, Kelly
Serv.
74,665........................... Aegon USA, dba Chattanooga, TN.... September 20, 2009.
Transamerica Life
Insurance Company.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(c) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible
to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met.

The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(c) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are
certified eligible to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met.

Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance

In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the
eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met
for the reasons specified.
The investigation revealed that the criterion under paragraph
(a)(1), or (b)(1), or (c)(1) (employment decline or threat of
separation) of section 222 has not been met.

The investigation revealed that the criteria under paragraphs
(a)(2)(A)(i) (decline in sales or production, or both) and (a)(2)(B)
(shift in production or services to a foreign country) of section 222
have not been met.

The investigation revealed that the criteria under paragraphs
(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift in production or
services to a foreign country) of section 222 have not been met.

[[Page 65521]]

Determinations Terminating Investigations of Petitions for Worker
Adjustment Assistance

After notice of the petitions was published in the Federal Register
and on the Department's Web site, as required by Section 221 of the Act
(19 U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated investigations of these
petitions.
The following determinations terminating investigations were issued
because the petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn.

The following determinations terminating investigations were issued
in cases where these petitions were not filed in accordance with the
requirements of 29 CFR 90.11. Every petition filed by workers must be
signed by at least three individuals of the petitioning worker group.
Petitioners separated more than one year prior to the date of the
petition cannot be covered under a certification of a petition under
Section 223(b), and therefore, may not be part of a petitioning worker
group. For one or more of these reasons, these petitions were deemed
invalid.

The following determinations terminating investigations were issued
because the petitioning groups of workers are covered by active
certifications. Consequently, further investigation in these cases
would serve no purpose since the petitioning group of workers cannot be
covered by more than one certification at a time.

I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued
during the period of October 4, 2010 through October 8, 2010. Copies of
these determinations may be requested under the Freedom of Information
Act. Requests may be submitted by fax, courier services, or mail to
FOIA Disclosure Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance (ETA),
U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC
20210 or tofoiarequest@dol.gov. These determinations also are available
on the Department's Web site at https://www.doleta.gov/tradeact under
the searchable listing of determinations.

Dated: October 15, 2010.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-26768 Filed 10-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.