Reports, Forms, and Recordkeeping Requirements, 65395-65396 [2010-26714]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 204 / Friday, October 22, 2010 / Notices
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also
will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. All comments received will
be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–BATS–
2010–028 and should be submitted on
or before November 12, 2010.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.11
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010–26677 Filed 10–21–10; 8:45 am]
findings and recommendations as it
deems appropriate.
The Secretary has appointed Joseph
Lake, a retired U.S. ambassador, as
Chair of the Board. He will be assisted
by Robert Bryson, Lewis Atherton,
Barbara Martin, Wayne Rychak and by
the Executive Secretary to the Board,
Linda Hartley. They bring to their
deliberations distinguished backgrounds
in government service and/or the
private sector.
The Board will submit its conclusions
and recommendations to Secretary
Clinton within 60 days of its first
meeting, unless the Chair determines a
need for additional time. Appropriate
action will be taken and reports
submitted to Congress on any
recommendations made by the Board.
Anyone with information relevant to
the Board’s examination of these
incidents should contact the Board
promptly at (202) 647–5204 or send a
fax to the Board at (202) 647–3282.
This notice shall be published in the
Federal Register.
Dated: October 8, 2010.
Patrick F. Kennedy,
Under Secretary for Management.
[FR Doc. 2010–26791 Filed 10–21–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–35–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[U.S. DOT Docket Number NHTSA–2010–
0135]
[Public Notice: 7213]
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Notice Convening an Accountability
Review Board To Examine the
Circumstances of the Death of Three
DoD Personnel Assigned to the U.S.
Embassy’s Office of Defense
Representative Pakistan (ODRP) on
February 3, 2010
Pursuant to Section 301 of the
Omnibus Diplomatic Security and
Antiterrorism Act of 1986, as amended
(22 U.S.C. 4831 et seq.), the Secretary of
State has determined that a recent attack
on three Department of Defense
personnel assigned to the U.S.
Embassy’s Office of Defense
Representative Pakistan (ODRP)
involved loss of life that was at or
related to a U.S. mission abroad.
Therefore, the Secretary has convened
an Accountability Review Board to
examine the facts and the circumstances
of the attacks and to report to me such
11 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:43 Oct 21, 2010
Jkt 223001
Reports, Forms, and Recordkeeping
Requirements
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Request for extension of a
currently approved collection of
information.
AGENCY:
Before a Federal agency can
collect certain information from the
public, it must receive approval from
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). Under procedures established
by the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995, before seeking OMB approval,
Federal agencies must solicit public
comment on proposed collections of
information, including extensions and
reinstatement of previously approved
collections. This document describes
one collection of information for which
NHTSA intends to seek OMB approval.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before December 21, 2010.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
65395
Comments must refer to the
docket notice numbers cited at the
beginning of this notice and be
submitted to Docket Management, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590, by any of the
following methods.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Agency Web Site: https://
dms.dot.gov. Follow the instructions for
submitting comments on the Docket
Management System.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility;
U. S. Department of Transportation,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 am
and 5 pm, Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays. Telephone: 1–
800–647–5527.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the agency name and docket
number for this proposed collection of
information. Note that all comments
received will be posted without change
to https://dms.dot.gov including any
personal information provided. Docket:
For access to the docket to read
background documents or comments
received, go to https://dms.dot.gov at any
time or to Room W12–140 on the
ground level of the DOT Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 am and 5 pm, Monday
through Friday, except Federal
Holidays.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Complete copies of each request for
collection of information may be
obtained at no charge from Mr. Hisham
Mohamed, NHTSA, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., West Building, Room #
W43–437, NVS–131, Washington, DC
20590. Mr. Mohamed’s telephone
number is (202) 366–0307. Please
identify the relevant collection of
information by referring to its OMB
Control Number.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
before an agency submits a proposed
collection of information to OMB for
approval, it must first publish a
document in the Federal Register
providing a 60-day comment period and
otherwise consult with members of the
public and affected agencies concerning
each proposed collection of information.
E:\FR\FM\22OCN1.SGM
22OCN1
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
65396
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 204 / Friday, October 22, 2010 / Notices
The OMB has promulgated
regulations describing what must be
included in such a document. Under
OMB’s regulation (at 5 CFR 1320.8(d)),
an agency must ask for public comment
on the following:
(i) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(ii) The accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
(iii) How to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected;
(iv) How to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including the use
of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g. permitting
electronic submission of responses.
In compliance with these
requirements, NHTSA asks for public
comments on the following proposed
collections of information:
Title: 49 CFR 575.104; Uniform Tire
Quality Grading Standard.
OMB Control Number: 2127–0519.
Affected Public: All passenger car tire
manufacturers and brand name owners
offering passenger car tires for sale in
the United States.
Form Number: The collection of this
information uses no standard form.
Abstract: Part 575 requires tire
manufacturers and tire brand owners to
submit reports to NHTSA regarding the
UTQGS grades of all passenger car tire
lines they offer for sale in the United
States. This information is used by
consumers of passenger car tires to
compare tire quality in making their
purchase decisions. The information is
provided in several different ways to
insure that the consumer can readily see
and understand the tire grade: (1) The
grades are molded into the sidewall of
the tire so that they can be reviewed on
both the new tire and the old tire that
is being replaced; (2) a paper label is
affixed to the tread face of the new tire
that provides the grade of that particular
tire line along with an explanation of
the grading system; (3) tire
manufacturers provide dealers with
brochures for public distribution listing
the grades of all of the tirelines they
offer for sale; and (4) NHTSA compiles
the grading information of all
manufacturers’ tirelines into a booklet
that is available to the public both in
printed form and on the Web site.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:43 Oct 21, 2010
Jkt 223001
Estimated Annual Burden: NHTSA
estimates that a total of 88,320 manhours are required to write the
brochures, engrave the new passenger
car tire molds, and affix the paper labels
to the tires. Based on an average hourly
rate of $22 per hour for rubber workers
in the United States, the cost to the
manufacturers is $1,943,040 to perform
those items listed above. The largest
portion of the cost burden imposed by
the UTQGS program arises from the
testing necessary to determine the
grades that should be assigned to the
tires. An average of 125 convoys, driven
7,200 miles each, consisting of four
vehicles and four drivers, are run each
year for treadwear testing. NHTSA
estimates it cost $0.60 per vehicle mile
including salaries, overhead and
reports. This brings the annual
treadwear testing cost to $2,160,000. For
the traction testing, it is estimated that
1,750 tires are tested annually with an
estimated cost of $38,500 for use of the
government test facility. Using a factor
of 3.5 times to cover salary and
overhead of test contractors, the
estimated cost of traction testing is
$134,750. A separate temperature grade
testing for tires is required, since the test
is no more an extension of the high
speed performance test of 49 CFR
571.109 which was required for safety
certification. Section 571.109 is
replaced by § 571.139, which has
different test speeds. For the
temperature testing, it is estimated that
1,750 tires are tested annually with an
estimated average cost per test of $423.
Therefore, the estimated UTQGS
temperature annual testing is $740,250.
Thus the total estimated cost for UTQGS
testing is $3,035,000. The cost of
printing the tread labels is
approximately $21,340,000 and the
estimate for printing brochures is at
$999,000. This yields a total annual
financial burden of approximately
$25,374,000 (approximately $25.5
million) on the tire manufacturers.
Estimated Annual Burden to the
Government: The estimated annual cost
of UTQGS to the Federal government is
$1,278,000. The cost consists of
approximately $152,000 for data
management, $730,000 for enforcement
testing, and about $396,000 for general
administration of the program.
Number of Respondents: There are
approximately 160 individual tire
brands sold in the United States. The
actual number of respondents is much
less than 160 due to company
acquisitions, mergers, and in most cases,
the manufacturer will report for the
various individual brand names that
they produce tires for. The actual
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
number of respondents is approximately
45 individual responses.
Comments are invited on: Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the Department,
including whether the information will
have practical utility; the accuracy of
the Department’s estimate of the burden
of the proposed information collection;
ways to enhance the quality, utility and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Issued on: October 19, 2010.
Joseph S. Carra,
Acting Associate Administrator for
Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2010–26714 Filed 10–21–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
[Summary Notice No. PE–2010–47]
Petition for Exemption; Summary of
Petition Received
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of petition for exemption
received.
AGENCY:
This notice contains a
summary of a petition seeking relief
from specified requirements of 14 CFR
part 43. The purpose of this notice is to
improve the public’s awareness of, and
participation in, this aspect of FAA’s
regulatory activities. Neither publication
of this notice nor the inclusion or
omission of information in the summary
is intended to affect the legal status of
the petition or its final disposition.
DATES: Comments on this petition must
identify the petition docket number
involved and must be received on or
before November 1, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments
identified by Docket Number FAA–
2010–1057 using any of the following
methods:
• Government-wide rulemaking Web
site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov
and follow the instructions for sending
your comments electronically.
• Mail: Send comments to the Docket
Management Facility; U.S. Department
of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, Washington, DC
20590.
• Fax: Fax comments to the Docket
Management Facility at 202–493–2251.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\22OCN1.SGM
22OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 204 (Friday, October 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65395-65396]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26714]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[U.S. DOT Docket Number NHTSA-2010-0135]
Reports, Forms, and Recordkeeping Requirements
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Request for extension of a currently approved collection of
information.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Before a Federal agency can collect certain information from
the public, it must receive approval from the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB). Under procedures established by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, before seeking OMB approval, Federal agencies must solicit
public comment on proposed collections of information, including
extensions and reinstatement of previously approved collections. This
document describes one collection of information for which NHTSA
intends to seek OMB approval.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 21, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Comments must refer to the docket notice numbers cited at
the beginning of this notice and be submitted to Docket Management,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
Washington, DC 20590, by any of the following methods.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Agency Web Site: https://dms.dot.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments on the Docket Management System.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: Docket Management Facility; U. S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery/Courier: 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590, between 9 am
and 5 pm, Monday through Friday, except Federal Holidays. Telephone: 1-
800-647-5527.
Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and
docket number for this proposed collection of information. Note that
all comments received will be posted without change to https://dms.dot.gov including any personal information provided. Docket: For
access to the docket to read background documents or comments received,
go to https://dms.dot.gov at any time or to Room W12-140 on the ground
level of the DOT Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590, between 9 am and 5 pm, Monday
through Friday, except Federal Holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Complete copies of each request for
collection of information may be obtained at no charge from Mr. Hisham
Mohamed, NHTSA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building, Room
W43-437, NVS-131, Washington, DC 20590. Mr. Mohamed's
telephone number is (202) 366-0307. Please identify the relevant
collection of information by referring to its OMB Control Number.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
before an agency submits a proposed collection of information to OMB
for approval, it must first publish a document in the Federal Register
providing a 60-day comment period and otherwise consult with members of
the public and affected agencies concerning each proposed collection of
information.
[[Page 65396]]
The OMB has promulgated regulations describing what must be
included in such a document. Under OMB's regulation (at 5 CFR
1320.8(d)), an agency must ask for public comment on the following:
(i) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have practical utility;
(ii) The accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(iii) How to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected;
(iv) How to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g. permitting electronic
submission of responses.
In compliance with these requirements, NHTSA asks for public
comments on the following proposed collections of information:
Title: 49 CFR 575.104; Uniform Tire Quality Grading Standard.
OMB Control Number: 2127-0519.
Affected Public: All passenger car tire manufacturers and brand
name owners offering passenger car tires for sale in the United States.
Form Number: The collection of this information uses no standard
form.
Abstract: Part 575 requires tire manufacturers and tire brand
owners to submit reports to NHTSA regarding the UTQGS grades of all
passenger car tire lines they offer for sale in the United States. This
information is used by consumers of passenger car tires to compare tire
quality in making their purchase decisions. The information is provided
in several different ways to insure that the consumer can readily see
and understand the tire grade: (1) The grades are molded into the
sidewall of the tire so that they can be reviewed on both the new tire
and the old tire that is being replaced; (2) a paper label is affixed
to the tread face of the new tire that provides the grade of that
particular tire line along with an explanation of the grading system;
(3) tire manufacturers provide dealers with brochures for public
distribution listing the grades of all of the tirelines they offer for
sale; and (4) NHTSA compiles the grading information of all
manufacturers' tirelines into a booklet that is available to the public
both in printed form and on the Web site.
Estimated Annual Burden: NHTSA estimates that a total of 88,320
man-hours are required to write the brochures, engrave the new
passenger car tire molds, and affix the paper labels to the tires.
Based on an average hourly rate of $22 per hour for rubber workers in
the United States, the cost to the manufacturers is $1,943,040 to
perform those items listed above. The largest portion of the cost
burden imposed by the UTQGS program arises from the testing necessary
to determine the grades that should be assigned to the tires. An
average of 125 convoys, driven 7,200 miles each, consisting of four
vehicles and four drivers, are run each year for treadwear testing.
NHTSA estimates it cost $0.60 per vehicle mile including salaries,
overhead and reports. This brings the annual treadwear testing cost to
$2,160,000. For the traction testing, it is estimated that 1,750 tires
are tested annually with an estimated cost of $38,500 for use of the
government test facility. Using a factor of 3.5 times to cover salary
and overhead of test contractors, the estimated cost of traction
testing is $134,750. A separate temperature grade testing for tires is
required, since the test is no more an extension of the high speed
performance test of 49 CFR 571.109 which was required for safety
certification. Section 571.109 is replaced by Sec. 571.139, which has
different test speeds. For the temperature testing, it is estimated
that 1,750 tires are tested annually with an estimated average cost per
test of $423. Therefore, the estimated UTQGS temperature annual testing
is $740,250. Thus the total estimated cost for UTQGS testing is
$3,035,000. The cost of printing the tread labels is approximately
$21,340,000 and the estimate for printing brochures is at $999,000.
This yields a total annual financial burden of approximately
$25,374,000 (approximately $25.5 million) on the tire manufacturers.
Estimated Annual Burden to the Government: The estimated annual
cost of UTQGS to the Federal government is $1,278,000. The cost
consists of approximately $152,000 for data management, $730,000 for
enforcement testing, and about $396,000 for general administration of
the program.
Number of Respondents: There are approximately 160 individual tire
brands sold in the United States. The actual number of respondents is
much less than 160 due to company acquisitions, mergers, and in most
cases, the manufacturer will report for the various individual brand
names that they produce tires for. The actual number of respondents is
approximately 45 individual responses.
Comments are invited on: Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Department, including whether the information will have practical
utility; the accuracy of the Department's estimate of the burden of the
proposed information collection; ways to enhance the quality, utility
and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to minimize
the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including
the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Issued on: October 19, 2010.
Joseph S. Carra,
Acting Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2010-26714 Filed 10-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P