Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Order Granting Approval to a Proposed Rule Change To Modify the Eligibility Criteria for the Second Compliance Period for a Bid Price Deficiency on the Nasdaq Capital Market, 65044-65046 [2010-26474]
Download as PDF
65044
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 203 / Thursday, October 21, 2010 / Notices
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants or Others
The Exchange has not solicited, and
does not intend to solicit, comments on
this proposed rule change. The
Exchange has not received any
unsolicited written comments from
members or other interested parties.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule
change does not: (1) Significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public
interest; (2) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (3) become
operative for 30 days from the date on
which it was filed, or such shorter time
as the Commission may designate if
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, it has
become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act13 and Rule 19b–
4(f)(6) thereunder.14
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–ISE–2010–101 on the
subject line.
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–ISE–2010–101. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also
will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. All comments received will
be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–ISE–
2010–101 and should be submitted on
or before November 12, 2010.
[Release No. 34–63110; File No. SR–
NASDAQ–2010–107]
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.15
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010–26509 Filed 10–20–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
13 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). When filing a proposed
rule change pursuant to Rule 19b–4(f)(6) under the
Act, an exchange is required to give the
Commission written notice of its intent to file the
proposed rule change, along with a brief description
and text of the proposed rule change, at least five
business days prior to the date of filing of the
proposed rule change, or such shorter time as
designated by the Commission. The Commission
notes that the Exchange has satisfied this
requirement.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
14 17
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:24 Oct 20, 2010
Jkt 223001
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Order
Granting Approval to a Proposed Rule
Change To Modify the Eligibility
Criteria for the Second Compliance
Period for a Bid Price Deficiency on
the Nasdaq Capital Market
October 14, 2010.
I. Introduction
On August 25, 2010, The NASDAQ
Stock Market LLC (‘‘Nasdaq’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule
19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule
change to modify the eligibility criteria
in order for a listed company to qualify
for the second compliance period for a
bid price deficiency on the Nasdaq
Capital Market. The proposed rule
change was published for comment in
the Federal Register on September 2,
2010.3 The Commission received no
comment letters on the proposal. This
order approves the proposed rule
change.
II. Description of the Proposal
Nasdaq is proposing, in order for a
company to receive a second
compliance period for a bid price
deficiency on the Nasdaq Capital Market
(‘‘Capital Market’’), to modify the
eligibility criteria concerning market
value of publicly held shares. Under the
current Nasdaq rules, when a company
has a closing bid price below $1 for 30
consecutive days, it is deemed deficient
under Nasdaq’s bid price continued
listing standard, and promptly receives
written notice that it has 180 calendar
days from such notification to regain
compliance.4 Compliance can be
achieved by maintaining a minimum $1
closing bid price for ten consecutive
days. At the expiration of the 180-day
compliance period, a company can
receive an additional 180-day
compliance period,5 provided it is
either already listed on the Capital
Market or transfers to that market and
satisfies all of the Capital Market’s
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62782
(August 27, 2010), 75 FR 53994 (‘‘Notice’’).
4 See Nasdaq Rule 5810(c)(3)(A).
5 In its filing, Nasdaq refers to the 180-day
compliance period as a ‘‘grace’’ period.
2 17
15 17
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\21OCN1.SGM
21OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 203 / Thursday, October 21, 2010 / Notices
initial listing criteria, except for bid
price.6
Nasdaq has observed that many
companies fail to qualify for the second
compliance period because they do not
meet the market value of publicly held
shares requirement for initial listing on
the Capital Market. Nasdaq therefore is
proposing to ease the requirements for
the second compliance period on the
Capital Market by allowing a company
to qualify if it satisfies the lower
continued listing requirement for
market value of publicly held shares,
thereby enabling more companies to be
eligible for the second compliance
period.7 The company would still need
to meet all of the other initial listing
criteria for Capital Market other than bid
price.8
Under the proposal, the company will
need to notify Nasdaq of its intent to
cure the bid price deficiency. If a
company does not indicate its intent to
cure the deficiency, or if it does not
appear to Nasdaq staff that it is possible
for the company to cure the deficiency,
the company would not be eligible for
the second compliance period under the
Capital Market rules. Under the
proposal, a company listed on Nasdaq’s
Global or Global Select Markets would
be permitted to transfer to the Capital
Market if it meets the applicable market
value of publicly held shares
requirement for continued listing and
all other applicable requirements for
initial listing on the Capital Market
(except for the bid price requirement),
and notifies Nasdaq of its intent to cure
the bid price deficiency.9 Once on the
Capital Market, the company would be
eligible for the second compliance
period on the Capital Market, unless it
does not appear to Nasdaq staff that it
is possible for the Company to cure the
deficiency.10 In its filing, Nasdaq noted
6 See
Nasdaq Rule 5810(c)(3)(A)(i)–(ii).
initial listing requirements for market value
of publicly held shares for common stock on the
Capital Market range from $5 million to $15
million, depending on the listing standard under
which the company qualifies; the continued listing
requirement is $1 million. See Nasdaq Rules
5505(b) and 5555(a)(4).
8 The initial listing standards for the Capital
Market are set forth in Nasdaq Rule 5505 and
include an equity standard, market value of listed
securities standard, and a net income standard. See
Nasdaq Rule 5505.
9 As noted above, Nasdaq Global and Global
Select companies can currently receive the
additional 180 day compliance period, provided
they meet all the applicable Capital Market initial
requirements and transfer to that market.
10 According to Nasdaq, once a company transfers
to the Capital Market, Nasdaq would assess whether
it is possible for the company to cure the
deficiency. If not, the company would be denied the
second 180 day compliance period, and Nasdaq
would commence delisting proceedings for the
company as a Capital Market listing.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
7 The
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:24 Oct 20, 2010
Jkt 223001
that under the proposal, while certain
companies that do not currently qualify
for the second compliance period could
receive an additional 180 days to
comply with the bid price requirement,
the proposed rule change would not
extend the overall maximum time of 360
days that is currently available to
qualifying companies.
Nasdaq also proposes to remove
language in Rule 5810(c)(3) referencing
the payment of fees by a company
which transfers to the Capital Market.
The current language implies that there
are fees applicable to such a company.
However, no fees are applicable under
Rule 5920(a) to such a company. Nasdaq
is proposing to delete the language, to
remove any confusion, and has also
proposed some other clarifying and nonsubstantive changes to the rule.11
III. Discussion and Commission
Findings
After careful consideration, the
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and the rules
and regulations thereunder applicable to
a national securities exchange 12 and, in
particular, the requirements of Section 6
of the Act.13 Specifically, the
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with Section
6(b)(5) of the Act,14 which requires,
among other things, that the rules of a
national securities exchange be
designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in
regulating, clearing, settling, processing
information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in securities, to
remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest and are not designed to
permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers or dealers.
The development and enforcement of
adequate standards governing the initial
and continued listing of securities on an
exchange is an activity of critical
importance to financial markets and the
investing public. Listing standards serve
as a means for an exchange to screen
issuers and to provide listed status only
to bona fide companies that have, or in
the case of an initial public offering will
11 See
Notice, supra note 3.
approving this proposed rule change the
Commission has considered the proposed rule’s
impact on efficiency, competition, and capital
formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
13 15 U.S.C. 78f.
14 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
12 In
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
65045
have, sufficient public float, investor
base, and trading interest to provide the
depth and liquidity necessary to
promote fair and orderly markets.
Adequate standards are especially
important given the expectations of
investors regarding exchange trading
and the imprimatur of listing on a
particular market. Once a security has
been approved for initial listing,
maintenance criteria allow an exchange
to monitor the status and trading
characteristics of that issue to ensure
that it continues to meet the exchange’s
standards for market depth and liquidity
so that fair and orderly markets can be
maintained, and so that only companies
suitable for listing remain listed on a
national securities exchange.
The Commission believes that the
proposal to modify the eligibility
criteria for the second compliance
period for a bid price deficiency on the
Capital Market is reasonable and
consistent with the Act, and furthers
investor protection and the public
interest. As stated above, Nasdaq has
observed that many companies fail to
qualify for the second compliance
period because they do not meet the
market value of publicly held shares
requirement for initial listing on the
Capital Market. The Commission notes
that to qualify for a second compliance
period, the company would still need to
meet all of the other initial listing
criteria for Capital Market other than bid
price, as well as the continued listing
requirement for market value of publicly
held shares.15 These standards should
help continue to ensure that only
companies that meet the minimum
requirements for adequate depth and
liquidity remain listed for an extended
period of time on the Capital Market.
In addition, the company will need to
notify Nasdaq of its intent to cure the
bid price deficiency. If a Capital Market
company does not indicate its intent to
cure the deficiency, or if it does not
appear to Nasdaq staff that it is possible
for the company to cure the deficiency,
the company would not be eligible for
the second compliance period.
Similarly, a company listed on the
Global or Global Select Markets would
be permitted to transfer to the Capital
Market if it meets the applicable market
value of publicly held shares
requirement for continued listing and
all other applicable requirements for
initial listing on the Capital Market
(except for the bid price requirement)
and notifies Nasdaq of its intent to cure
the bid price deficiency. Once on the
Capital Market, the company would be
eligible for the second compliance
15 See
E:\FR\FM\21OCN1.SGM
supra note 8.
21OCN1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
65046
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 203 / Thursday, October 21, 2010 / Notices
period on the Capital Market, unless it
does not appear to Nasdaq staff that it
is possible for the Company to cure the
deficiency.
The Commission believes that
requiring a company to affirmatively
state its intent to cure the bid price
deficiency and Nasdaq staff to
determine whether it is possible for the
company to cure that deficiency,
provides further protections to
investors, by helping to ensure that only
companies that are serious and capable
of gaining compliance with the Capital
Market listing standards within the
timeframe provided qualify for the
second compliance period. In this
regard, the Commission would expect a
thorough review to ensure that it is
possible for the bid price deficiency to
be cured at the end of the second 180
day compliance period and, if not,
would expect Nasdaq to immediately
commence delisting proceedings.
In approving the Nasdaq’s proposal,
the Commission recognizes that certain
companies that do not currently qualify
for the second compliance period could
receive additional time to remain listed
on a public market. The proposal,
however, does not extend the overall
maximum time of 360 days that a
company may remain listed before
delisting proceedings will commence.
Moreover, the proposal eliminates the
automatic nature of the second 180 day
bid price compliance period that exists
under the current rules. Further,
notwithstanding the change in
eligibility criteria for a second
compliance period, the Commission
expects Nasdaq to monitor companies
closely that are out of compliance and
use its authority to delist issuers in a
prompt, efficient, and fair manner
where necessary and appropriate, in
accordance with Nasdaq Rule 5100,
including where there are public
interest or other concerns such as low
price or market value, that make
continued listing unwarranted.
Finally, the Commission finds that
Nasdaq’s proposal to remove language
in Rule 5810(c)(3) will reduce confusion
regarding the application of the rule by
clarifying that there are no fees
applicable to a company which transfer
to the Capital Market. The additional
changes proposed by Nasdaq to the text
of Rule 5810(c)(3)(A)(i)–(ii) conform the
rule language and format of the two
paragraphs and clarify that Nasdaq will
assess a company for compliance with
applicable listing requirements based on
the company’s most recent public filings
and market information. The
Commission believes that these changes
either clarify the rule or are nonsubstantive.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:24 Oct 20, 2010
Jkt 223001
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,16 that the
proposed rule change (SR–NASDAQ–
2010–107), be, and hereby is, approved.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.17
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010–26474 Filed 10–20–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
In the Matter of Cape Systems Group,
Inc., Caribbean Cigar Company, Casual
Male Corp., Cell Power Technologies,
Inc., Cellmetrix, Inc. (f/k/a BCAM
International, Inc.), Cellular Products,
Inc. (n/k/a 872 Main Street Corp.),
Ceptor Corp., CGS Scientific Corp.,
and Ciprico, Inc., File No. 500–1; Order
of Suspension of Trading
October 19, 2010.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of Cape
Systems Group, Inc. because it has not
filed any periodic reports since the
period ended December 31, 2006.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of Caribbean
Cigar Company because it has not filed
any periodic reports since the period
ended September 30, 1998.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of Casual Male
Corp. because it has not filed any
periodic reports since the period ended
February 3, 2001.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of Cell Power
Technologies, Inc. because it has not
filed any periodic reports since the
period ended April 30, 2006.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of Cellmetrix,
Inc. (f/k/a BCAM International, Inc.)
because it has not filed any periodic
reports since the period ended June 30,
2000.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
16 15
17 17
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of Cellular
Products, Inc. (n/k/a 872 Main Street
Corp.) because it has not filed any
periodic reports since the period ended
December 31, 1994.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of Ceptor
Corp. because it has not filed any
periodic reports since the period ended
September 30, 2007.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of CGS
Scientific Corp. because it has not filed
any periodic reports since the period
ended February 29, 2000.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of Ciprico, Inc.
because it has not filed any periodic
reports since the period ended
December 31, 2007.
The Commission is of the opinion that
the public interest and the protection of
investors require a suspension of trading
in the securities of the above-listed
companies.
Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to
Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, that trading in the
securities of the above-listed companies
is suspended for the period from 9:30
a.m. EDT on October 19, 2010, through
11:59 p.m. EDT on November 1, 2010.
By the Commission.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010–26698 Filed 10–19–10; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Comment Request
The Social Security Administration
(SSA) publishes a list of information
collection packages requiring clearance
by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) in compliance with
Public Law (Pub. L.) 104–13, the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
effective October 1, 1995. This notice
includes a new information collection
for OMB approval.
SSA is soliciting comments on the
accuracy of the agency’s burden
estimate; the need for the information;
its practical utility; ways to enhance its
quality, utility, and clarity; and ways to
minimize burden on respondents,
including the use of automated
E:\FR\FM\21OCN1.SGM
21OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 203 (Thursday, October 21, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65044-65046]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26474]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-63110; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2010-107]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Order
Granting Approval to a Proposed Rule Change To Modify the Eligibility
Criteria for the Second Compliance Period for a Bid Price Deficiency on
the Nasdaq Capital Market
October 14, 2010.
I. Introduction
On August 25, 2010, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to
modify the eligibility criteria in order for a listed company to
qualify for the second compliance period for a bid price deficiency on
the Nasdaq Capital Market. The proposed rule change was published for
comment in the Federal Register on September 2, 2010.\3\ The Commission
received no comment letters on the proposal. This order approves the
proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62782 (August 27,
2010), 75 FR 53994 (``Notice'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Description of the Proposal
Nasdaq is proposing, in order for a company to receive a second
compliance period for a bid price deficiency on the Nasdaq Capital
Market (``Capital Market''), to modify the eligibility criteria
concerning market value of publicly held shares. Under the current
Nasdaq rules, when a company has a closing bid price below $1 for 30
consecutive days, it is deemed deficient under Nasdaq's bid price
continued listing standard, and promptly receives written notice that
it has 180 calendar days from such notification to regain
compliance.\4\ Compliance can be achieved by maintaining a minimum $1
closing bid price for ten consecutive days. At the expiration of the
180-day compliance period, a company can receive an additional 180-day
compliance period,\5\ provided it is either already listed on the
Capital Market or transfers to that market and satisfies all of the
Capital Market's
[[Page 65045]]
initial listing criteria, except for bid price.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Nasdaq Rule 5810(c)(3)(A).
\5\ In its filing, Nasdaq refers to the 180-day compliance
period as a ``grace'' period.
\6\ See Nasdaq Rule 5810(c)(3)(A)(i)-(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nasdaq has observed that many companies fail to qualify for the
second compliance period because they do not meet the market value of
publicly held shares requirement for initial listing on the Capital
Market. Nasdaq therefore is proposing to ease the requirements for the
second compliance period on the Capital Market by allowing a company to
qualify if it satisfies the lower continued listing requirement for
market value of publicly held shares, thereby enabling more companies
to be eligible for the second compliance period.\7\ The company would
still need to meet all of the other initial listing criteria for
Capital Market other than bid price.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ The initial listing requirements for market value of
publicly held shares for common stock on the Capital Market range
from $5 million to $15 million, depending on the listing standard
under which the company qualifies; the continued listing requirement
is $1 million. See Nasdaq Rules 5505(b) and 5555(a)(4).
\8\ The initial listing standards for the Capital Market are set
forth in Nasdaq Rule 5505 and include an equity standard, market
value of listed securities standard, and a net income standard. See
Nasdaq Rule 5505.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under the proposal, the company will need to notify Nasdaq of its
intent to cure the bid price deficiency. If a company does not indicate
its intent to cure the deficiency, or if it does not appear to Nasdaq
staff that it is possible for the company to cure the deficiency, the
company would not be eligible for the second compliance period under
the Capital Market rules. Under the proposal, a company listed on
Nasdaq's Global or Global Select Markets would be permitted to transfer
to the Capital Market if it meets the applicable market value of
publicly held shares requirement for continued listing and all other
applicable requirements for initial listing on the Capital Market
(except for the bid price requirement), and notifies Nasdaq of its
intent to cure the bid price deficiency.\9\ Once on the Capital Market,
the company would be eligible for the second compliance period on the
Capital Market, unless it does not appear to Nasdaq staff that it is
possible for the Company to cure the deficiency.\10\ In its filing,
Nasdaq noted that under the proposal, while certain companies that do
not currently qualify for the second compliance period could receive an
additional 180 days to comply with the bid price requirement, the
proposed rule change would not extend the overall maximum time of 360
days that is currently available to qualifying companies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ As noted above, Nasdaq Global and Global Select companies
can currently receive the additional 180 day compliance period,
provided they meet all the applicable Capital Market initial
requirements and transfer to that market.
\10\ According to Nasdaq, once a company transfers to the
Capital Market, Nasdaq would assess whether it is possible for the
company to cure the deficiency. If not, the company would be denied
the second 180 day compliance period, and Nasdaq would commence
delisting proceedings for the company as a Capital Market listing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nasdaq also proposes to remove language in Rule 5810(c)(3)
referencing the payment of fees by a company which transfers to the
Capital Market. The current language implies that there are fees
applicable to such a company. However, no fees are applicable under
Rule 5920(a) to such a company. Nasdaq is proposing to delete the
language, to remove any confusion, and has also proposed some other
clarifying and non-substantive changes to the rule.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See Notice, supra note 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Discussion and Commission Findings
After careful consideration, the Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the
rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities
exchange \12\ and, in particular, the requirements of Section 6 of the
Act.\13\ Specifically, the Commission finds that the proposed rule
change is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\14\ which
requires, among other things, that the rules of a national securities
exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating,
clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest
and are not designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers,
issuers, brokers or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ In approving this proposed rule change the Commission has
considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition,
and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
\13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
\14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The development and enforcement of adequate standards governing the
initial and continued listing of securities on an exchange is an
activity of critical importance to financial markets and the investing
public. Listing standards serve as a means for an exchange to screen
issuers and to provide listed status only to bona fide companies that
have, or in the case of an initial public offering will have,
sufficient public float, investor base, and trading interest to provide
the depth and liquidity necessary to promote fair and orderly markets.
Adequate standards are especially important given the expectations of
investors regarding exchange trading and the imprimatur of listing on a
particular market. Once a security has been approved for initial
listing, maintenance criteria allow an exchange to monitor the status
and trading characteristics of that issue to ensure that it continues
to meet the exchange's standards for market depth and liquidity so that
fair and orderly markets can be maintained, and so that only companies
suitable for listing remain listed on a national securities exchange.
The Commission believes that the proposal to modify the eligibility
criteria for the second compliance period for a bid price deficiency on
the Capital Market is reasonable and consistent with the Act, and
furthers investor protection and the public interest. As stated above,
Nasdaq has observed that many companies fail to qualify for the second
compliance period because they do not meet the market value of publicly
held shares requirement for initial listing on the Capital Market. The
Commission notes that to qualify for a second compliance period, the
company would still need to meet all of the other initial listing
criteria for Capital Market other than bid price, as well as the
continued listing requirement for market value of publicly held
shares.\15\ These standards should help continue to ensure that only
companies that meet the minimum requirements for adequate depth and
liquidity remain listed for an extended period of time on the Capital
Market.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See supra note 8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, the company will need to notify Nasdaq of its intent
to cure the bid price deficiency. If a Capital Market company does not
indicate its intent to cure the deficiency, or if it does not appear to
Nasdaq staff that it is possible for the company to cure the
deficiency, the company would not be eligible for the second compliance
period. Similarly, a company listed on the Global or Global Select
Markets would be permitted to transfer to the Capital Market if it
meets the applicable market value of publicly held shares requirement
for continued listing and all other applicable requirements for initial
listing on the Capital Market (except for the bid price requirement)
and notifies Nasdaq of its intent to cure the bid price deficiency.
Once on the Capital Market, the company would be eligible for the
second compliance
[[Page 65046]]
period on the Capital Market, unless it does not appear to Nasdaq staff
that it is possible for the Company to cure the deficiency.
The Commission believes that requiring a company to affirmatively
state its intent to cure the bid price deficiency and Nasdaq staff to
determine whether it is possible for the company to cure that
deficiency, provides further protections to investors, by helping to
ensure that only companies that are serious and capable of gaining
compliance with the Capital Market listing standards within the
timeframe provided qualify for the second compliance period. In this
regard, the Commission would expect a thorough review to ensure that it
is possible for the bid price deficiency to be cured at the end of the
second 180 day compliance period and, if not, would expect Nasdaq to
immediately commence delisting proceedings.
In approving the Nasdaq's proposal, the Commission recognizes that
certain companies that do not currently qualify for the second
compliance period could receive additional time to remain listed on a
public market. The proposal, however, does not extend the overall
maximum time of 360 days that a company may remain listed before
delisting proceedings will commence. Moreover, the proposal eliminates
the automatic nature of the second 180 day bid price compliance period
that exists under the current rules. Further, notwithstanding the
change in eligibility criteria for a second compliance period, the
Commission expects Nasdaq to monitor companies closely that are out of
compliance and use its authority to delist issuers in a prompt,
efficient, and fair manner where necessary and appropriate, in
accordance with Nasdaq Rule 5100, including where there are public
interest or other concerns such as low price or market value, that make
continued listing unwarranted.
Finally, the Commission finds that Nasdaq's proposal to remove
language in Rule 5810(c)(3) will reduce confusion regarding the
application of the rule by clarifying that there are no fees applicable
to a company which transfer to the Capital Market. The additional
changes proposed by Nasdaq to the text of Rule 5810(c)(3)(A)(i)-(ii)
conform the rule language and format of the two paragraphs and clarify
that Nasdaq will assess a company for compliance with applicable
listing requirements based on the company's most recent public filings
and market information. The Commission believes that these changes
either clarify the rule or are non-substantive.
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\16\ that the proposed rule change (SR-NASDAQ-2010-107), be, and
hereby is, approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\17\
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2010-26474 Filed 10-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P