Notice of Submission for OMB Review, 64295-64296 [2010-26290]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 201 / Tuesday, October 19, 2010 / Notices
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
However, masking only occurs during
the time of the signal (and potential
secondary arrivals of indirect rays),
versus TTS, which occurs continuously
for its duration. Impulse sounds from
underwater detonation and pile driving
are brief and the majority of most
animals’ vocalizations would not be
masked. Although impulse noises such
as those from underwater explosives
and impact pile driving tend to decay at
distance, and thus become non-impulse,
give the area of extremely shallow water
(which effectively attenuates low
frequency sound of these impulses) and
the small NEW of explosives, the SPLs
at these distances are expected to be
barely above ambient level. Therefore,
masking effects from underwater
detonation are expected to be minimal
and unlikely. If masking or
communication impairment were to
occur briefly, it would be in the
frequency ranges below 100 Hz, which
overlaps with some mysticete
vocalizations; however, it would likely
not mask the entirety of any particular
vocalization or communication series
because of the short impulse.
PTS, Injury, or Mortality
The modeling for take estimates show
that no marine mammal would be taken
by Level A harassment (injury, PTS
included) or mortality due to the low
power of the underwater detonation and
the small ZOIs.
Based on these assessments, NMFS
determined that approximately 6 gray
whales, 221 California sea lions, 12
harbor seals, and 323 bottlenose
dolphins could be affected by Level B
harassment (TTS and sub-TTS) as a
result of the proposed SSTC training
activities. These numbers represent
approximately 0.02%, 0.93%, and
0.06% of gray whales (eastern North
Pacific stock), California sea lions (U.S.
Stock), and harbor seal (California
stock), respectively in the vicinity of the
proposed SSTC Study Area (calculation
based on NMFS 2009 U.S. Pacific
Marine Mammal Stock Assessment;
Carretta et al. 2010). However, the
estimated take of California coastal
stock of bottlenose dolphin indicates
that the entire population (100%) could
be affected as the result of the Navy’s
proposed SSTC training activities.
Given the fact that these annual takes
are spread over the entire year, and that
on average each individual bottlenose
dolphin would be exposed once to
received levels that could cause Level B
harassment in a year, NMFS does not
believe such adverse effects would be
biologically significant as to affect the
growth, survivor, and reproduction of
this stock.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:24 Oct 18, 2010
Jkt 223001
Additionally, as discussed previously,
the aforementioned take estimates do
not account for the implementation of
mitigation measures. With the
implementation of mitigation and
monitoring measures, NMFS expects
that the takes would be reduced further.
Coupled with the fact that these impacts
will likely not occur in areas and times
critical to reproduction, NMFS has
preliminarily determined that the total
taking incidental to the Navy’s proposed
SSTC training activities would have a
negligible impact on the marine
mammal species and stocks present in
the SSTC Study Area.
Endangered Species Act (ESA)
No marine mammal species are listed
as endangered or threatened under the
ESA with confirmed or possible
occurrence in the study area. Therefore,
section 7 consultation under the ESA for
NMFS’s proposed issuance of an MMPA
authorization is not warranted.
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA)
The Navy is preparing an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
for the proposed SSTC training
activities. A draft EIS was released in
July 2010 and it is available at https://
www.silverstrandtraining
complexeis.com/EIS.aspx/. NMFS is a
cooperating agency (as defined by the
Council on Environmental Quality (40
CFR 1501.6)) in the preparation of the
EIS. NMFS has reviewed the Draft EIS
and will be working with the Navy on
the Final EIS (FEIS).
NMFS intends to adopt the Navy’s
FEIS, if adequate and appropriate, and
we believe that the Navy’s FEIS will
allow NMFS to meet its responsibilities
under NEPA for the issuance of the IHA
for training activities in the SSTC Study
Area. If the Navy’s FEIS is not adequate,
NMFS will supplement the existing
analysis and documents to ensure that
we comply with NEPA prior to the
issuance of the IHA.
Dated: October 14, 2010.
James H. Lecky,
Director, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–26286 Filed 10–18–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Notice of Submission for OMB Review
Department of Education.
Comment Request.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Director, Information
Collection Clearance Division,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
64295
Regulatory Information Management
Services, Office of Management invites
comments on the submission for OMB
review as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13).
DATES: Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before
November 18, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should
be addressed to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Attention: Education Desk Officer,
Office of Management and Budget, 725
17th Street, NW., Room 10222, New
Executive Office Building, Washington,
DC 20503, be faxed to (202) 395–5806 or
e-mailed to
oira_submission@omb.eop.gov with a
cc: To ICDocketMgr@ed.gov. Please note
that written comments received in
response to this notice will be
considered public records.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires
that the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) provide interested
Federal agencies and the public an early
opportunity to comment on information
collection requests. The OMB is
particularly interested in comments
which: (1) Evaluate whether the
proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (2) Evaluate the
accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (4) Minimize the burden
of the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through
the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Dated: October 13, 2010.
Darrin A. King,
Director, Information Collection Clearance
Division, Regulatory Information
Management Services, Office of Management.
Institute of Education Sciences
Type of Review: Reinstatement.
Title of Collection: Schools and
Staffing Survey (SASS 2011/12)
Preliminary Field Activities 2010/11.
OMB Control Number: 1850–0598.
Agency Form Number(s): N/A.
Frequency of Responses: One time.
Affected Public: Businesses or other
for-profit; Not-for-profit institutions;
State, Local, or Tribal Government, State
E:\FR\FM\19OCN1.SGM
19OCN1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
64296
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 201 / Tuesday, October 19, 2010 / Notices
Educational Agencies or Local
Educational Agencies.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Responses: 18,503.
Total Estimated Annual Burden
Hours: 886.
Abstract: The Schools and Staffing
Survey (SASS) is an in-depth, nationally
representative survey of first through
twelfth grade public and private school
teachers, principals, schools, library
media centers, and school districts. For
public school districts, principals,
schools, teachers and school libraries,
the survey estimates are staterepresentative. For private school
principals, schools, and teachers, the
survey estimates are representative of
private school types. There are two
additional components within SASS’s
4-year data collection cycle: The
Teacher Follow-up Survey and the
Principal Follow-up Survey, which are
conducted a year after the SASS main
collection. SASS respondents include
public and private school principals,
teachers, and school and school district
staff. Topics covered include
characteristics of teachers, principals,
schools, school libraries, teacher
training opportunities, retention,
retirement, hiring, and shortages. This
submission for SASS 2011/12 requests
OMB approval for preliminary field
activities to take place prior to data
collection in the fall of 2011, including
(a) submitting SASS research
applications to special districts that
require prior research approval before
their schools and a coordinator can be
recruited for the study; (b) conducting a
calling operation to verify whether a
subset of districts are one-school
districts and will require receiving a
combined school- and district-level
questionnaire; (c) contacting all of the
remaining districts, asking whether they
are willing to provide a Teacher Listing
Form at a later time and to request email
addresses for sampled school principals;
and (d) mailing of a pre-contact letter to
sample schools to verify the mailing
address of the school and to notify the
school about the upcoming data
collection.
Requests for copies of the information
collection submission for OMB review
may be accessed from the RegInfo.gov
Web site at https://www.reginfo.gov/
public/do/PRAMain or from the
Department’s Web site at https://
edicsweb.ed.gov, by selecting the
‘‘Browse Pending Collections’’ link and
by clicking on link number 4376. When
you access the information collection,
click on ‘‘Download Attachments’’ to
view. Written requests for information
should be addressed to U.S. Department
of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:24 Oct 18, 2010
Jkt 223001
SW., LBJ, Washington, DC 20202–4537.
Requests may also be electronically
mailed to the Internet address
ICDocketMgr@ed.gov or faxed to 202–
401–0920. Please specify the complete
title of the information collection and
OMB Control Number when making
your request.
Individuals who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–
8339.
[FR Doc. 2010–26290 Filed 10–18–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Revised Record of Decision for Offer
of Conditional Commitment for a Loan
Guarantee for, and Electrical
Interconnection of, the Shepherds Flat
Wind Project
U.S. Department of Energy
(DOE), Loan Programs Office (LP) and
Bonneville Power Administration
(BPA).
ACTION: Revised Record of Decision
(ROD).
AGENCY:
The U.S. Department of
Energy announces its decisions to
provide a conditional loan guarantee
for, and interconnection to the Federal
Columbia River Transmission System
(FCRTS) of, the 846-megawatt (MW)
Shepherds Flat Wind Project (Wind
Project) in Gilliam and Morrow
counties, Oregon. This ROD revises a
previous BPA ROD approving the
interconnection of the Wind Project to
the FCRTS that was issued on July 18,
2008. The Revised ROD reflects the
decisions with regard to the Wind
Project for: The issuance by BPA of
modified Large Generator
Interconnection Agreements (LGIAs);
and the offer by LP of a conditional
commitment for a loan guarantee to
Caithness Shepherds Flat, LLC (CSF) for
construction of the Wind Project. The
Revised ROD also addresses the division
of the previously approved Wind Project
into three separate projects, and the
transfer of these projects to three
separate subsidiaries of CSF that will
result in additional turbines,
adjustments of site boundaries and
additional acreage.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Doug Corkran, Bonneville Power
Administration, KEC–4, P.O. Box 3621,
Portland, Oregon 97208–3621; toll-free
telephone number 1–800–622–4519; fax
number 503–230–5699; or e-mail
dfcorkran@bpa.gov; and Matthew
McMillen, Director, Environmental
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Compliance Division, Loan Programs
Office (LP–1), U.S. Department of
Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue,
SW., Washington, DC 20585; telephone
202–586–7248; or e-mail
Matthew.McMillen@hq.doe.gov. For
general information about the DOE
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) process contact Carol
Borgstrom, Director, Office of NEPA
Policy and Compliance (GC–54), U.S.
Department of Energy, 1000
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20585; telephone 202–
586–4600; leave a message at 800–472–
2756; or e-mail AskNEPA@hq.doe.gov.
Information about DOE NEPA activities
and access to many DOE NEPA
documents are available through the
DOE NEPA Web site at https://
www.nepa.energy.gov.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the Revised ROD,
the July 2008 ROD for the Electrical
Interconnection of the Shepherds Flat
Wind Project, the Business Plan
Environmental Impact Statement and
Business Plan ROD may be obtained by:
(1) Calling the BPA toll-free document
request line, 1–800–622–4520, (2)
submitting a request to the BPA Public
Information Center, P.O. Box 12999,
Portland, Oregon 97212, or (3) accessing
these documents on the BPA NEPA
document Web site at https://
www.efw.bpa.gov/
environmental_services/nepadocs.aspx.
The Revised ROD will also be posted on
the DOE LP Web site at https://
www.lgprogram.energy.gov and the DOE
NEPA Web site at https://
www.nepa.energy.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
On July 18, 2008, the BPA issued a
ROD to interconnect the proposed Wind
Project to the FCRTS (73 FR 43730, July
28, 2008). DOE, through its Loan
Programs Office, and BPA, are issuing
this Revised ROD to address actions by
the project developers subsequent to the
2008 ROD: A loan guarantee application
submitted to LP, and applications to
BPA for Large Generator
Interconnection Agreements related to
the transfer of ownership of the Wind
Project to three wholly owned
subsidiaries. The Wind Project, as
modified, has been approved by the
Oregon Energy Facility Siting Council
(EFSC).
As with the decision made by BPA for
the originally proposed Wind Project,
BPA and LP decisions concerning the
revised Wind Project are consistent with
and tiered to the BPA Business Plan
Final Environmental Impact Statement
(BP EIS) (DOE/EIS–0183, June 1995),
E:\FR\FM\19OCN1.SGM
19OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 201 (Tuesday, October 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64295-64296]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26290]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Notice of Submission for OMB Review
AGENCY: Department of Education.
ACTION: Comment Request.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Director, Information Collection Clearance Division,
Regulatory Information Management Services, Office of Management
invites comments on the submission for OMB review as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13).
DATES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments on or before
November 18, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should be addressed to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attention: Education Desk Officer,
Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, NW., Room 10222, New
Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503, be faxed to (202) 395-
5806 or e-mailed to oira_submission@omb.eop.gov with a cc: To
ICDocketMgr@ed.gov. Please note that written comments received in
response to this notice will be considered public records.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires that the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) provide interested Federal agencies and the public an
early opportunity to comment on information collection requests. The
OMB is particularly interested in comments which: (1) Evaluate whether
the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility; (2) Evaluate the accuracy of
the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions
used; (3) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information
to be collected; and (4) Minimize the burden of the collection of
information on those who are to respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of information technology.
Dated: October 13, 2010.
Darrin A. King,
Director, Information Collection Clearance Division, Regulatory
Information Management Services, Office of Management.
Institute of Education Sciences
Type of Review: Reinstatement.
Title of Collection: Schools and Staffing Survey (SASS 2011/12)
Preliminary Field Activities 2010/11.
OMB Control Number: 1850-0598.
Agency Form Number(s): N/A.
Frequency of Responses: One time.
Affected Public: Businesses or other for-profit; Not-for-profit
institutions; State, Local, or Tribal Government, State
[[Page 64296]]
Educational Agencies or Local Educational Agencies.
Total Estimated Number of Annual Responses: 18,503.
Total Estimated Annual Burden Hours: 886.
Abstract: The Schools and Staffing Survey (SASS) is an in-depth,
nationally representative survey of first through twelfth grade public
and private school teachers, principals, schools, library media
centers, and school districts. For public school districts, principals,
schools, teachers and school libraries, the survey estimates are state-
representative. For private school principals, schools, and teachers,
the survey estimates are representative of private school types. There
are two additional components within SASS's 4-year data collection
cycle: The Teacher Follow-up Survey and the Principal Follow-up Survey,
which are conducted a year after the SASS main collection. SASS
respondents include public and private school principals, teachers, and
school and school district staff. Topics covered include
characteristics of teachers, principals, schools, school libraries,
teacher training opportunities, retention, retirement, hiring, and
shortages. This submission for SASS 2011/12 requests OMB approval for
preliminary field activities to take place prior to data collection in
the fall of 2011, including (a) submitting SASS research applications
to special districts that require prior research approval before their
schools and a coordinator can be recruited for the study; (b)
conducting a calling operation to verify whether a subset of districts
are one-school districts and will require receiving a combined school-
and district-level questionnaire; (c) contacting all of the remaining
districts, asking whether they are willing to provide a Teacher Listing
Form at a later time and to request email addresses for sampled school
principals; and (d) mailing of a pre-contact letter to sample schools
to verify the mailing address of the school and to notify the school
about the upcoming data collection.
Requests for copies of the information collection submission for
OMB review may be accessed from the RegInfo.gov Web site at https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain or from the Department's Web site at
https://edicsweb.ed.gov, by selecting the ``Browse Pending Collections''
link and by clicking on link number 4376. When you access the
information collection, click on ``Download Attachments'' to view.
Written requests for information should be addressed to U.S. Department
of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., LBJ, Washington, DC 20202-4537.
Requests may also be electronically mailed to the Internet address
ICDocketMgr@ed.gov or faxed to 202-401-0920. Please specify the
complete title of the information collection and OMB Control Number
when making your request.
Individuals who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD)
may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-
8339.
[FR Doc. 2010-26290 Filed 10-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P