Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance, 63509-63512 [2010-26014]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 199 / Friday, October 15, 2010 / Notices for workers of the subject firm. The workers were engaged in employment related to the supply of pharmaceutical research and development services. The company reports that workers leased from Adecco Engineering and Technical were employed on-site at the Norwich, New York location of Warner Chilcott Pharmaceuticals, Inc. The Department has determined that these workers were sufficiently under the control of the subject firm to be considered leased workers. Based on these findings, the Department is amending this certification to include workers leased from Adecco Engineering and Technical working on-site at the Norwich, New York location of Warner Chilcott Pharmaceuticals, Inc. The amended notice applicable to TA–W–74,489 is hereby issued as follows: All workers of Warner Chilcott Pharmaceuticals, Inc., including on-site leased workers from Adecco Engineering and Technical, Norwich, New York, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after August 6, 2009, through September 10, 2012, and all workers in the group threatened with total or partial separation from employment on the date of certification through two years from the date of certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. Signed at Washington, DC this 8th day of October 2010. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 2010–26017 Filed 10–14–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES [TA–W–72,933] Hewlett Packard, Hewlett Packard— Enterprise Business Services, Formerly Known as Electronic Data Systems, Including On-Site Leased Workers From Sun Microsystems, Inc., Dell Computer Corp., EMC Corp., EMC Corp. Total, Cisco Systems Capital Corporation, Microsoft Corp., Symantec Corp., Xerox Corp., VMWare, Inc., Sun Microsystems Federal, Inc., ABM Business Machines, Inc., and Vision IT Pontiac, MI; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (‘‘Act’’), VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:01 Oct 14, 2010 Jkt 223001 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on January 25, 2010, applicable to workers of Hewlett Packard, Hewlett Packard—Enterprise Business Services, formerly known as Electronic Data Systems, including onsite leased workers from the above listed firms, Pontiac, Michigan. The Department’s Notice of determination was published in the Federal Register on March 5, 2010 (75 FR 10322). The notice was amended on July 13, 2010 to correct the impact date. The notice was published in the Federal Register on July 26, 2010 (75 43555). At the request of the petitioners, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged in activities related to information technology services. New information shows that workers leased from Vision IT were employed on-site at the Pontiac, Michigan location of Hewlett Packard, Hewlett Packard— Enterprise Business Services, formerly known as Electronic Data Systems. The Department has determined that these workers were sufficiently under the control of Hewlett Packard, Hewlett Packard—Enterprise Business Services, formerly known as Electronic Data Systems to be considered leased workers. Based on these findings, the Department is amending this certification to include workers leased from Vision IT working on-site at the Pontiac, Michigan location of Hewlett Packard, Hewlett Packard—Enterprise Business Services, formerly known as Electronic Data Systems. The intent of the Department’s certification is to include all workers employed Hewlett Packard, Hewlett Packard—Enterprise Business Services, formerly known as Electronic Data Systems who were adversely affected by the acquisition of information technology services to India. Accordingly, the Department is amending this certification to properly reflect this matter. The amended notice applicable to TA–W–72,933 is hereby issued as follows: All workers of Hewlett Packard, Hewlett Packard—Enterprise—Services, formerly known as Electronic Data Systems, including on-site leased workers from Sun Microsystems, Inc., Dell Computers Corp., EMC Corp., EMC Corp. Total, Cisco Systems Capital Corp., Microsoft Corp., Symantec Corp., Xerox Corp., VMWare, Inc., Sun Microsystems Federal, Inc., ABM Business Machines, Inc., Vision IT, Pontiac, Michigan, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after June 25, 2008, PO 00000 Frm 00077 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 63509 through January 25, 2012, and all workers in the group threatened with total or partial separation from employment on date of certification through January 25, 2012, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. Signed in Washington, DC, this 8th day of October 2010. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 2010–26016 Filed 10–14–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers by (TA–W) number issued during the period of September 27, 2010 through October 1, 2010. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met. I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the following must be satisfied: (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased absolutely; and (3) One of the following must be satisfied: (A) Imports of articles or services like or directly competitive with articles produced or services supplied by such firm have increased; (B) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are directly incorporated, have increased; (C) Imports of articles directly incorporating one or more component parts produced outside the United States that are like or directly competitive with imports of articles incorporating one or more component parts produced by such firm have increased; E:\FR\FM\15OCN1.SGM 15OCN1 63510 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 199 / Friday, October 15, 2010 / Notices (D) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles which are produced directly using services supplied by such firm, have increased; and (4) The increase in imports contributed importantly to such workers’ separation or threat of separation and to the decline in the sales or production of such firm; or II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the following must be satisfied: (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) One of the following must be satisfied: (A) There has been a shift by the workers’ firm to a foreign country in the production of articles or supply of services like or directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; (B) There has been an acquisition from a foreign country by the workers’ firm of articles/services that are like or directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; and (3) The shift/acquisition contributed importantly to the workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected workers in public agencies and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must be met. (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the public agency have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The public agency has acquired from a foreign country services like or directly competitive with services which are supplied by such agency; and TA–W No. mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES 73,874 73,877 74,020 74,349 (3) The acquisition of services contributed importantly to such workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected secondary workers of a firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(c) of the Act must be met. (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers’ firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The workers’ firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, and such supply or production is related to the article or service that was the basis for such certification; and (3) either— (A) The workers’ firm is a supplier and the component parts it supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the workers’ firm; or (B) A loss of business by the workers’ firm with the firm described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected workers in firms identified by the International Trade Commission and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(f) of the Act must be met. (1) The workers’ firm is publicly identified by name by the International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an investigation resulting in— (A) An affirmative determination of serious injury or threat thereof under section 202(b)(1); (B) An affirmative determination of market disruption or threat thereof under section 421(b)(1); or (C) An affirmative final determination of material injury or threat thereof under section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A)); (2) The petition is filed during the 1year period beginning on the date on which— (A) A summary of the report submitted to the President by the International Trade Commission under section 202(f)(1) with respect to the affirmative determination described in paragraph (1)(A) is published in the Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); or (B) Notice of an affirmative determination described in subparagraph (1) is published in the Federal Register; and (3) The workers have become totally or partially separated from the workers’ firm within— (A) The 1-year period described in paragraph (2); or (B) Notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the 1-year period preceding the 1-year period described in paragraph (2). Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance The following certifications have been issued. The date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determination. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been met. Subject firm ............... ............... ............... ............... Location The Wise Company, Inc. (B&M Seating) ......................................... L.A. Najarian, Inc .............................................................................. The Electric Materials Company, Subsidiary of United Stars .......... Belding Hausman, Inc., Weldon Mill, Leased Workers from Compensation Management. Memphis, TN .............................. Greene, NY ................................. North East, PA ............................ Emporia, VA ................................ The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or Subject firm Location 73,621 ............... Thermo Fisher Hamilton, Subsidiary of Thermo Fisher Scientific, Lab Works Stations Division. Two Rivers, WI ........................... 16:01 Oct 14, 2010 Jkt 223001 April 6, 2009. March 29, 2009. April 12, 2009. June 28, 2009. services) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W No. VerDate Mar<15>2010 Impact date PO 00000 Frm 00078 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\15OCN1.SGM 15OCN1 Impact date March 2, 2009. Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 199 / Friday, October 15, 2010 / Notices 63511 TA–W No. Subject firm Location 74,272 ............... Medtronic, Inc., Cardiac Rhythm Disease Management, Leased Workers of Advantage Technical, etc. Certegy Check Services, Inc., Fidelity National Payment Services, Leased Workers from Appleone. Mermec, Inc., FKA ImageMap, Inc., Leased Worker from Modis, Inc. BreconRidge Manufacturing Solutions, Sanmina-SCI Corporation, Leased Workers from Kelly Services and Penski. Zach System Corporation, Zach System SPA, Leased Workers of Turner Industries and Go. Acme Electric, Actuant Corporation, Leased Workers From Mega Force Staffing. American Girl Brands, LLC, Subsidiary of Mattel, Inc ..................... Hotels.Com, An Expedia, Inc. Company, Latam ............................. Telair International, Incorporated, Nordisk Aviation Products Division. Janssen R&D and Janssen Pharmaceutical Supply Group, Divisions of J&J. Fiskars Brands, Inc., Garden Division, On-Site Leased Workers of QTI. Fiskars Brands, Inc., School, Office and Craft Division, On-Site Leased Workers of Manpower. Georgia-Pacific Wood Products LLC ............................................... Watson Laboratories, Inc., Watson Pharmaceuticals, Danbury Pharmacal, Leased Workers Adecco Staffing. Burgess-Norton Manufacturing Company, Inc., Leased Workers from Selectremedy and Manpower. STMicroelectronics, Inc .................................................................... Mounds View, MN ...................... June 21, 2009. West Valley City, UT .................. June 30, 2009. Columbia, SC .............................. July 13, 2009. Ogdensburg, NY ......................... July 29, 2009. La Porte, TX ............................... August 3, 2009. Lumberton, NC ........................... August 15, 2010. Middleton, WI .............................. Arlington, TX ............................... Simi Valley, CA ........................... August 6, 2009. July 31, 2009. July 20, 2009. Springhouse, PA ......................... August 24, 2009. Sauk City, WI .............................. August 31, 2009. Wausau, WI ................................ August 31, 2009. Grenada, MS .............................. Carmel, NY ................................. August 26, 2009. September 3, 2009. Claremore, OK ............................ September 10, 2009. Phoenix, AZ ................................ October 31, 2010. 74,337 ............... 74,385 ............... 74,464 ............... 74,467 ............... 74,491 ............... 74,504 ............... 74,517 ............... 74,556 ............... 74,567 ............... 74,580 ............... 74,580A ............. 74,585 ............... 74,606 ............... 74,621 ............... 74,657 ............... The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(c) (supplier to a firm whose workers Impact date are certified eligible to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 72,947 ............... 74,425 ............... Supreme Foam, Inc .......................................................................... Douglas Corporation, Leased Workers Masterson Personnel, Just in Case, etc. Alumax Service Center, Division of SAPA Extrusions, Leased Workers of Manpower Temporary. Interstate Electronics Corp., L–3 Communications, Leased Workers of Bently Global Resources, etc. Lear Corporation .............................................................................. Archdale, NC .............................. Eden Prairie, MN ........................ November 17, 2008. July 22, 2009. Riverside, MO ............................. July 15, 2009. Anaheim, CA ............................... August 31, 2009. Louisville, KY .............................. September 3, 2009. 74,471 ............... 74,592 ............... 74,600 ............... The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(c) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W No. Subject firm Location 74,569 ............... Titus Transportation, LP ................................................................... Denton, TX .................................. Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met for the reasons specified. The investigation revealed that the criterion under paragraph (a)(1), or mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES TA–W No. Subject firm 73,846 ............... 74,191 ............... 74,506 ............... AT&T Operations, Inc., Network Management Center .................... Pennsylvania Railcar—Plant #2, dba Railcar Services Company ... Acxiom CDC Corporation ................................................................. The investigation revealed that the criteria under paragraphs (a)(2)(A)(i) VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:01 Oct 14, 2010 Jkt 223001 Frm 00079 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 August 24, 2009 (b)(1), or (c)(1)(employment decline or threat of separation) of section 222 has not been met. Location Impact date Boulder, CO. West Middlesex, PA. Chicago, IL. (decline in sales or production, or both) and (a)(2)(B) (shift in production or PO 00000 Impact date services to a foreign country) of section 222 have not been met. E:\FR\FM\15OCN1.SGM 15OCN1 63512 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 199 / Friday, October 15, 2010 / Notices TA–W No. Subject firm 74,564 ............... Ally Financial Incorporated, Motor Acceptance Corp. (GMAC), Auctioneering Unit, Darlington Auto Auction. The investigation revealed that the criteria under paragraphs(a)(2)(A) Location Subject firm 72,765 ............... Mount Vernon Consulting, LLC, Workers’ Wages Were Reported Under 14 W. Administrative Services, Agora, Inc. Roddie Trucking, LLC, SWR, Inc. .................................................... Saint Barnabas Health Care System, Patient Accounting Dept., Leased Workers, Liberty and Tritech. Cemex Construction Materials Atlantic, LLC, Wampum Cement Plant. Parker Paint Company ..................................................................... United Steelworkers Local 746L ...................................................... United Auto Workers Local 2166, UAW .......................................... 73,395 ............... 73,972 ............... 74,040 ............... 74,136 ............... 74,320 ............... 74,528 ............... Determinations Terminating Investigations of Petitions for Worker Adjustment Assistance After notice of the petitions was published in the Federal Register and San Angelo, TX. Ocean Port, NJ. Wampum, PA. Beaverton, OR. Tyler, TX. Shreveport, LA. on the Department’s Web site, as required by Section 221 of the Act (19 U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated investigations of these petitions. 74,248 ............... EDS, an HP Company (Re-Branded as HP—Enterprise Services), Virtual Workers Across the United States. JohnsonDiversey .............................................................................. The following determinations terminating investigations were issued because the petitioning groups of Santa Cruz, CA. workers are covered by active certifications. Consequently, further investigation in these cases would serve 74,603 ............... Thermo EGS Gauging, Inc., Field Service Engineers ..................... Dated: October 8, 2010. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 2010–26014 Filed 10–14–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:01 Oct 14, 2010 Jkt 223001 Investigations Regarding Certifications of Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance Petitions have been filed with the Secretary of Labor under Section 221(a) of the Trade Act of 1974 (‘‘the Act’’) and are identified in the Appendix to this notice. Upon receipt of these petitions, the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Employment and Training Administration, has instituted investigations pursuant to Section 221(a) of the Act. The purpose of each of the investigations is to determine whether the workers are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Title II, Chapter 2, of the Act. The investigations will further relate, as appropriate, to the Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Impact date Wilmington, MA. Employment and Training Administration Frm 00080 no purpose since the petitioning group of workers cannot be covered by more than one certification at a time. Location DEPARTMENT OF LABOR PO 00000 Impact date Palo Alto, CA. Subject firm I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued during the period of September 27, 2010 through October 1, 2010. Copies of these determinations may be requested under the Freedom of Information Act. Requests may be submitted by fax, courier services, or mail to FOIA Disclosure Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance (ETA), U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 or tofoiarequest@dol.gov. These determinations also are available on the Department’s Web site at http://www.doleta.gov/tradeact under the searchable listing of determinations. The following determinations terminating investigations were issued because the petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Location TA–W No. Impact date Baltimore, MD. Subject firm 74,343 ............... country) of section 222 have not been met. Location TA–W No. mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES Darlington, SC. (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services to a foreign TA–W No. Impact date determination of the date on which total or partial separations began or threatened to begin and the subdivision of the firm involved. The petitioners or any other persons showing a substantial interest in the subject matter of the investigations may request a public hearing, provided such request is filed in writing with the Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, at the address shown below, not later than October 25, 2010. Interested persons are invited to submit written comments regarding the subject matter of the investigations to the Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, at the address shown below, not later than October 25, 2010. Copies of these petitions may be requested under the Freedom of Information Act. Requests may be submitted by fax, courier services, or mail, to FOIA Disclosure Officer, Office E:\FR\FM\15OCN1.SGM 15OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 199 (Friday, October 15, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63509-63512]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26014]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for 
Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of 
determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment 
assistance for workers by (TA-W) number issued during the period of 
September 27, 2010 through October 1, 2010.
    In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of 
a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to 
apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility 
requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
    I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the following must be satisfied:
    (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such 
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are 
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
    (2) The sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased 
absolutely; and
    (3) One of the following must be satisfied:
    (A) Imports of articles or services like or directly competitive 
with articles produced or services supplied by such firm have 
increased;
    (B) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles 
into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are 
directly incorporated, have increased;
    (C) Imports of articles directly incorporating one or more 
component parts produced outside the United States that are like or 
directly competitive with imports of articles incorporating one or more 
component parts produced by such firm have increased;

[[Page 63510]]

    (D) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles 
which are produced directly using services supplied by such firm, have 
increased; and
    (4) The increase in imports contributed importantly to such 
workers' separation or threat of separation and to the decline in the 
sales or production of such firm; or
    II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the following must be satisfied:
    (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such 
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are 
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
    (2) One of the following must be satisfied:
    (A) There has been a shift by the workers' firm to a foreign 
country in the production of articles or supply of services like or 
directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm;
    (B) There has been an acquisition from a foreign country by the 
workers' firm of articles/services that are like or directly 
competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm; and
    (3) The shift/acquisition contributed importantly to the workers' 
separation or threat of separation.
    In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely 
affected workers in public agencies and a certification issued 
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each 
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must 
be met.
    (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the public 
agency have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to 
become totally or partially separated;
    (2) The public agency has acquired from a foreign country services 
like or directly competitive with services which are supplied by such 
agency; and
    (3) The acquisition of services contributed importantly to such 
workers' separation or threat of separation.
    In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely 
affected secondary workers of a firm and a certification issued 
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each 
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(c) of the Act must 
be met.
    (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the 
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are 
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
    (2) The workers' firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a 
firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of 
eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, and such supply or 
production is related to the article or service that was the basis for 
such certification; and
    (3) either--
    (A) The workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it 
supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least 
20 percent of the production or sales of the workers' firm; or
    (B) A loss of business by the workers' firm with the firm described 
in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers' separation or 
threat of separation.
    In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely 
affected workers in firms identified by the International Trade 
Commission and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply 
for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility 
requirements of Section 222(f) of the Act must be met.
    (1) The workers' firm is publicly identified by name by the 
International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an 
investigation resulting in--
    (A) An affirmative determination of serious injury or threat 
thereof under section 202(b)(1);
    (B) An affirmative determination of market disruption or threat 
thereof under section 421(b)(1); or
    (C) An affirmative final determination of material injury or threat 
thereof under section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A));
    (2) The petition is filed during the 1-year period beginning on the 
date on which--
    (A) A summary of the report submitted to the President by the 
International Trade Commission under section 202(f)(1) with respect to 
the affirmative determination described in paragraph (1)(A) is 
published in the Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); or
    (B) Notice of an affirmative determination described in 
subparagraph (1) is published in the Federal Register; and
    (3) The workers have become totally or partially separated from the 
workers' firm within--
    (A) The 1-year period described in paragraph (2); or
    (B) Notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the 1-year period preceding 
the 1-year period described in paragraph (2).

Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    The following certifications have been issued. The date following 
the company name and location of each determination references the 
impact date for all workers of such determination.
    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been 
met.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          TA-W No.                   Subject firm                Location                  Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
73,874.....................  The Wise Company, Inc. (B&M  Memphis, TN..........  April 6, 2009.
                              Seating).
73,877.....................  L.A. Najarian, Inc.........  Greene, NY...........  March 29, 2009.
74,020.....................  The Electric Materials       North East, PA.......  April 12, 2009.
                              Company, Subsidiary of
                              United Stars.
74,349.....................  Belding Hausman, Inc.,       Emporia, VA..........  June 28, 2009.
                              Weldon Mill, Leased
                              Workers from Compensation
                              Management.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services) of the Trade Act 
have been met.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          TA-W No.                   Subject firm                Location                  Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
73,621.....................  Thermo Fisher Hamilton,      Two Rivers, WI.......  March 2, 2009.
                              Subsidiary of Thermo
                              Fisher Scientific, Lab
                              Works Stations Division.

[[Page 63511]]

 
74,272.....................  Medtronic, Inc., Cardiac     Mounds View, MN......  June 21, 2009.
                              Rhythm Disease Management,
                              Leased Workers of
                              Advantage Technical, etc.
74,337.....................  Certegy Check Services,      West Valley City, UT.  June 30, 2009.
                              Inc., Fidelity National
                              Payment Services, Leased
                              Workers from Appleone.
74,385.....................  Mermec, Inc., FKA ImageMap,  Columbia, SC.........  July 13, 2009.
                              Inc., Leased Worker from
                              Modis, Inc.
74,464.....................  BreconRidge Manufacturing    Ogdensburg, NY.......  July 29, 2009.
                              Solutions, Sanmina-SCI
                              Corporation, Leased
                              Workers from Kelly
                              Services and Penski.
74,467.....................  Zach System Corporation,     La Porte, TX.........  August 3, 2009.
                              Zach System SPA, Leased
                              Workers of Turner
                              Industries and Go.
74,491.....................  Acme Electric, Actuant       Lumberton, NC........  August 15, 2010.
                              Corporation, Leased
                              Workers From Mega Force
                              Staffing.
74,504.....................  American Girl Brands, LLC,   Middleton, WI........  August 6, 2009.
                              Subsidiary of Mattel, Inc.
74,517.....................  Hotels.Com, An Expedia,      Arlington, TX........  July 31, 2009.
                              Inc. Company, Latam.
74,556.....................  Telair International,        Simi Valley, CA......  July 20, 2009.
                              Incorporated, Nordisk
                              Aviation Products Division.
74,567.....................  Janssen R&D and Janssen      Springhouse, PA......  August 24, 2009.
                              Pharmaceutical Supply
                              Group, Divisions of J&J.
74,580.....................  Fiskars Brands, Inc.,        Sauk City, WI........  August 31, 2009.
                              Garden Division, On-Site
                              Leased Workers of QTI.
74,580A....................  Fiskars Brands, Inc.,        Wausau, WI...........  August 31, 2009.
                              School, Office and Craft
                              Division, On-Site Leased
                              Workers of Manpower.
74,585.....................  Georgia-Pacific Wood         Grenada, MS..........  August 26, 2009.
                              Products LLC.
74,606.....................  Watson Laboratories, Inc.,   Carmel, NY...........  September 3, 2009.
                              Watson Pharmaceuticals,
                              Danbury Pharmacal, Leased
                              Workers Adecco Staffing.
74,621.....................  Burgess-Norton               Claremore, OK........  September 10, 2009.
                              Manufacturing Company,
                              Inc., Leased Workers from
                              Selectremedy and Manpower.
74,657.....................  STMicroelectronics, Inc....  Phoenix, AZ..........  October 31, 2010.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(c) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible 
to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          TA-W No.                   Subject firm                Location                  Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
72,947.....................  Supreme Foam, Inc..........  Archdale, NC.........  November 17, 2008.
74,425.....................  Douglas Corporation, Leased  Eden Prairie, MN.....  July 22, 2009.
                              Workers Masterson
                              Personnel, Just in Case,
                              etc.
74,471.....................  Alumax Service Center,       Riverside, MO........  July 15, 2009.
                              Division of SAPA
                              Extrusions, Leased Workers
                              of Manpower Temporary.
74,592.....................  Interstate Electronics       Anaheim, CA..........  August 31, 2009.
                              Corp., L-3 Communications,
                              Leased Workers of Bently
                              Global Resources, etc.
74,600.....................  Lear Corporation...........  Louisville, KY.......  September 3, 2009.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(c) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are 
certified eligible to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          TA-W No.                   Subject firm                Location                  Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
74,569.....................  Titus Transportation, LP...  Denton, TX...........  August 24, 2009
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the 
eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met 
for the reasons specified.
    The investigation revealed that the criterion under paragraph 
(a)(1), or (b)(1), or (c)(1)(employment decline or threat of 
separation) of section 222 has not been met.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          TA-W No.                   Subject firm                Location                  Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
73,846.....................  AT&T Operations, Inc.,       Boulder, CO..........
                              Network Management Center.
74,191.....................  Pennsylvania Railcar--Plant  West Middlesex, PA...
                              2, dba Railcar
                              Services Company.
74,506.....................  Acxiom CDC Corporation.....  Chicago, IL..........
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The investigation revealed that the criteria under paragraphs 
(a)(2)(A)(i) (decline in sales or production, or both) and (a)(2)(B) 
(shift in production or services to a foreign country) of section 222 
have not been met.

[[Page 63512]]



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          TA-W No.                   Subject firm                Location                  Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
74,564.....................  Ally Financial               Darlington, SC.......
                              Incorporated, Motor
                              Acceptance Corp. (GMAC),
                              Auctioneering Unit,
                              Darlington Auto Auction.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The investigation revealed that the criteria under 
paragraphs(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift in 
production or services to a foreign country) of section 222 have not 
been met.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          TA-W No.                   Subject firm                Location                  Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
72,765.....................  Mount Vernon Consulting,     Baltimore, MD........
                              LLC, Workers' Wages Were
                              Reported Under 14 W.
                              Administrative Services,
                              Agora, Inc.
73,395.....................  Roddie Trucking, LLC, SWR,   San Angelo, TX.......
                              Inc..
73,972.....................  Saint Barnabas Health Care   Ocean Port, NJ.......
                              System, Patient Accounting
                              Dept., Leased Workers,
                              Liberty and Tritech.
74,040.....................  Cemex Construction           Wampum, PA...........
                              Materials Atlantic, LLC,
                              Wampum Cement Plant.
74,136.....................  Parker Paint Company.......  Beaverton, OR........
74,320.....................  United Steelworkers Local    Tyler, TX............
                              746L.
74,528.....................  United Auto Workers Local    Shreveport, LA.......
                              2166, UAW.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Determinations Terminating Investigations of Petitions for Worker 
Adjustment Assistance

    After notice of the petitions was published in the Federal Register 
and on the Department's Web site, as required by Section 221 of the Act 
(19 U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated investigations of these 
petitions.
    The following determinations terminating investigations were issued 
because the petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          TA-W No.                   Subject firm                Location                  Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
74,248.....................  EDS, an HP Company (Re-      Palo Alto, CA........
                              Branded as HP--Enterprise
                              Services), Virtual Workers
                              Across the United States.
74,343.....................  JohnsonDiversey............  Santa Cruz, CA.......
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The following determinations terminating investigations were issued 
because the petitioning groups of workers are covered by active 
certifications. Consequently, further investigation in these cases 
would serve no purpose since the petitioning group of workers cannot be 
covered by more than one certification at a time.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          TA-W No.                   Subject firm                Location                  Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
74,603.....................  Thermo EGS Gauging, Inc.,    Wilmington, MA.......
                              Field Service Engineers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued 
during the period of September 27, 2010 through October 1, 2010. Copies 
of these determinations may be requested under the Freedom of 
Information Act. Requests may be submitted by fax, courier services, or 
mail to FOIA Disclosure Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance 
(ETA), U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20210 or tofoiarequest@dol.gov. These determinations 
also are available on the Department's Web site at http://www.doleta.gov/tradeact under the searchable listing of determinations.

    Dated: October 8, 2010.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-26014 Filed 10-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P