Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance, 63509-63512 [2010-26014]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 199 / Friday, October 15, 2010 / Notices
for workers of the subject firm. The
workers were engaged in employment
related to the supply of pharmaceutical
research and development services.
The company reports that workers
leased from Adecco Engineering and
Technical were employed on-site at the
Norwich, New York location of Warner
Chilcott Pharmaceuticals, Inc. The
Department has determined that these
workers were sufficiently under the
control of the subject firm to be
considered leased workers.
Based on these findings, the
Department is amending this
certification to include workers leased
from Adecco Engineering and Technical
working on-site at the Norwich, New
York location of Warner Chilcott
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
The amended notice applicable to
TA–W–74,489 is hereby issued as
follows:
All workers of Warner Chilcott
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., including on-site
leased workers from Adecco Engineering and
Technical, Norwich, New York, who became
totally or partially separated from
employment on or after August 6, 2009,
through September 10, 2012, and all workers
in the group threatened with total or partial
separation from employment on the date of
certification through two years from the date
of certification, are eligible to apply for
adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of
Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.
Signed at Washington, DC this 8th day of
October 2010.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010–26017 Filed 10–14–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
[TA–W–72,933]
Hewlett Packard, Hewlett Packard—
Enterprise Business Services,
Formerly Known as Electronic Data
Systems, Including On-Site Leased
Workers From Sun Microsystems, Inc.,
Dell Computer Corp., EMC Corp., EMC
Corp. Total, Cisco Systems Capital
Corporation, Microsoft Corp.,
Symantec Corp., Xerox Corp., VMWare,
Inc., Sun Microsystems Federal, Inc.,
ABM Business Machines, Inc., and
Vision IT Pontiac, MI; Amended
Certification Regarding Eligibility To
Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended (‘‘Act’’),
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:01 Oct 14, 2010
Jkt 223001
19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor
issued a Certification of Eligibility to
Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance on January 25, 2010,
applicable to workers of Hewlett
Packard, Hewlett Packard—Enterprise
Business Services, formerly known as
Electronic Data Systems, including onsite leased workers from the above listed
firms, Pontiac, Michigan. The
Department’s Notice of determination
was published in the Federal Register
on March 5, 2010 (75 FR 10322). The
notice was amended on July 13, 2010 to
correct the impact date. The notice was
published in the Federal Register on
July 26, 2010 (75 43555).
At the request of the petitioners, the
Department reviewed the certification
for workers of the subject firm. The
workers are engaged in activities related
to information technology services.
New information shows that workers
leased from Vision IT were employed
on-site at the Pontiac, Michigan location
of Hewlett Packard, Hewlett Packard—
Enterprise Business Services, formerly
known as Electronic Data Systems. The
Department has determined that these
workers were sufficiently under the
control of Hewlett Packard, Hewlett
Packard—Enterprise Business Services,
formerly known as Electronic Data
Systems to be considered leased
workers.
Based on these findings, the
Department is amending this
certification to include workers leased
from Vision IT working on-site at the
Pontiac, Michigan location of Hewlett
Packard, Hewlett Packard—Enterprise
Business Services, formerly known as
Electronic Data Systems.
The intent of the Department’s
certification is to include all workers
employed Hewlett Packard, Hewlett
Packard—Enterprise Business Services,
formerly known as Electronic Data
Systems who were adversely affected by
the acquisition of information
technology services to India.
Accordingly, the Department is
amending this certification to properly
reflect this matter.
The amended notice applicable to
TA–W–72,933 is hereby issued as
follows:
All workers of Hewlett Packard, Hewlett
Packard—Enterprise—Services, formerly
known as Electronic Data Systems, including
on-site leased workers from Sun
Microsystems, Inc., Dell Computers Corp.,
EMC Corp., EMC Corp. Total, Cisco Systems
Capital Corp., Microsoft Corp., Symantec
Corp., Xerox Corp., VMWare, Inc., Sun
Microsystems Federal, Inc., ABM Business
Machines, Inc., Vision IT, Pontiac, Michigan,
who became totally or partially separated
from employment on or after June 25, 2008,
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
63509
through January 25, 2012, and all workers in
the group threatened with total or partial
separation from employment on date of
certification through January 25, 2012, are
eligible to apply for adjustment assistance
under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act
of 1974, as amended.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 8th day of
October 2010.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010–26016 Filed 10–14–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Notice of Determinations Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19
U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor
herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to
apply for trade adjustment assistance for
workers by (TA–W) number issued
during the period of September 27, 2010
through October 1, 2010.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section
222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the
following must be satisfied:
(1) A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
(2) The sales or production, or both,
of such firm have decreased absolutely;
and
(3) One of the following must be
satisfied:
(A) Imports of articles or services like
or directly competitive with articles
produced or services supplied by such
firm have increased;
(B) Imports of articles like or directly
competitive with articles into which one
or more component parts produced by
such firm are directly incorporated,
have increased;
(C) Imports of articles directly
incorporating one or more component
parts produced outside the United
States that are like or directly
competitive with imports of articles
incorporating one or more component
parts produced by such firm have
increased;
E:\FR\FM\15OCN1.SGM
15OCN1
63510
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 199 / Friday, October 15, 2010 / Notices
(D) Imports of articles like or directly
competitive with articles which are
produced directly using services
supplied by such firm, have increased;
and
(4) The increase in imports
contributed importantly to such
workers’ separation or threat of
separation and to the decline in the
sales or production of such firm; or
II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the
following must be satisfied:
(1) A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
(2) One of the following must be
satisfied:
(A) There has been a shift by the
workers’ firm to a foreign country in the
production of articles or supply of
services like or directly competitive
with those produced/supplied by the
workers’ firm;
(B) There has been an acquisition
from a foreign country by the workers’
firm of articles/services that are like or
directly competitive with those
produced/supplied by the workers’ firm;
and
(3) The shift/acquisition contributed
importantly to the workers’ separation
or threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in public agencies and
a certification issued regarding
eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section
222(b) of the Act must be met.
(1) A significant number or proportion
of the workers in the public agency have
become totally or partially separated, or
are threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
(2) The public agency has acquired
from a foreign country services like or
directly competitive with services
which are supplied by such agency; and
TA–W No.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
73,874
73,877
74,020
74,349
(3) The acquisition of services
contributed importantly to such
workers’ separation or threat of
separation.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for adversely
affected secondary workers of a firm and
a certification issued regarding
eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section
222(c) of the Act must be met.
(1) A significant number or proportion
of the workers in the workers’ firm have
become totally or partially separated, or
are threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
(2) The workers’ firm is a Supplier or
Downstream Producer to a firm that
employed a group of workers who
received a certification of eligibility
under Section 222(a) of the Act, and
such supply or production is related to
the article or service that was the basis
for such certification; and
(3) either—
(A) The workers’ firm is a supplier
and the component parts it supplied to
the firm described in paragraph (2)
accounted for at least 20 percent of the
production or sales of the workers’ firm;
or
(B) A loss of business by the workers’
firm with the firm described in
paragraph (2) contributed importantly to
the workers’ separation or threat of
separation.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in firms identified by
the International Trade Commission and
a certification issued regarding
eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section 222(f)
of the Act must be met.
(1) The workers’ firm is publicly
identified by name by the International
Trade Commission as a member of a
domestic industry in an investigation
resulting in—
(A) An affirmative determination of
serious injury or threat thereof under
section 202(b)(1);
(B) An affirmative determination of
market disruption or threat thereof
under section 421(b)(1); or
(C) An affirmative final determination
of material injury or threat thereof under
section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of
the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.
1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A));
(2) The petition is filed during the 1year period beginning on the date on
which—
(A) A summary of the report
submitted to the President by the
International Trade Commission under
section 202(f)(1) with respect to the
affirmative determination described in
paragraph (1)(A) is published in the
Federal Register under section 202(f)(3);
or
(B) Notice of an affirmative
determination described in
subparagraph (1) is published in the
Federal Register; and
(3) The workers have become totally
or partially separated from the workers’
firm within—
(A) The 1-year period described in
paragraph (2); or
(B) Notwithstanding section 223(b)(1),
the 1-year period preceding the 1-year
period described in paragraph (2).
Affirmative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been
issued. The date following the company
name and location of each
determination references the impact
date for all workers of such
determination.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the
Trade Act have been met.
Subject firm
...............
...............
...............
...............
Location
The Wise Company, Inc. (B&M Seating) .........................................
L.A. Najarian, Inc ..............................................................................
The Electric Materials Company, Subsidiary of United Stars ..........
Belding Hausman, Inc., Weldon Mill, Leased Workers from Compensation Management.
Memphis, TN ..............................
Greene, NY .................................
North East, PA ............................
Emporia, VA ................................
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or
Subject firm
Location
73,621 ...............
Thermo Fisher Hamilton, Subsidiary of Thermo Fisher Scientific,
Lab Works Stations Division.
Two Rivers, WI ...........................
16:01 Oct 14, 2010
Jkt 223001
April 6, 2009.
March 29, 2009.
April 12, 2009.
June 28, 2009.
services) of the Trade Act have been
met.
TA–W No.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Impact date
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\15OCN1.SGM
15OCN1
Impact date
March 2, 2009.
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 199 / Friday, October 15, 2010 / Notices
63511
TA–W No.
Subject firm
Location
74,272 ...............
Medtronic, Inc., Cardiac Rhythm Disease Management, Leased
Workers of Advantage Technical, etc.
Certegy Check Services, Inc., Fidelity National Payment Services,
Leased Workers from Appleone.
Mermec, Inc., FKA ImageMap, Inc., Leased Worker from Modis,
Inc.
BreconRidge Manufacturing Solutions, Sanmina-SCI Corporation,
Leased Workers from Kelly Services and Penski.
Zach System Corporation, Zach System SPA, Leased Workers of
Turner Industries and Go.
Acme Electric, Actuant Corporation, Leased Workers From Mega
Force Staffing.
American Girl Brands, LLC, Subsidiary of Mattel, Inc .....................
Hotels.Com, An Expedia, Inc. Company, Latam .............................
Telair International, Incorporated, Nordisk Aviation Products Division.
Janssen R&D and Janssen Pharmaceutical Supply Group, Divisions of J&J.
Fiskars Brands, Inc., Garden Division, On-Site Leased Workers of
QTI.
Fiskars Brands, Inc., School, Office and Craft Division, On-Site
Leased Workers of Manpower.
Georgia-Pacific Wood Products LLC ...............................................
Watson Laboratories, Inc., Watson Pharmaceuticals, Danbury
Pharmacal, Leased Workers Adecco Staffing.
Burgess-Norton Manufacturing Company, Inc., Leased Workers
from Selectremedy and Manpower.
STMicroelectronics, Inc ....................................................................
Mounds View, MN ......................
June 21, 2009.
West Valley City, UT ..................
June 30, 2009.
Columbia, SC ..............................
July 13, 2009.
Ogdensburg, NY .........................
July 29, 2009.
La Porte, TX ...............................
August 3, 2009.
Lumberton, NC ...........................
August 15, 2010.
Middleton, WI ..............................
Arlington, TX ...............................
Simi Valley, CA ...........................
August 6, 2009.
July 31, 2009.
July 20, 2009.
Springhouse, PA .........................
August 24, 2009.
Sauk City, WI ..............................
August 31, 2009.
Wausau, WI ................................
August 31, 2009.
Grenada, MS ..............................
Carmel, NY .................................
August 26, 2009.
September 3, 2009.
Claremore, OK ............................
September 10, 2009.
Phoenix, AZ ................................
October 31, 2010.
74,337 ...............
74,385 ...............
74,464 ...............
74,467 ...............
74,491 ...............
74,504 ...............
74,517 ...............
74,556 ...............
74,567 ...............
74,580 ...............
74,580A .............
74,585 ...............
74,606 ...............
74,621 ...............
74,657 ...............
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(c) (supplier to a firm whose workers
Impact date
are certified eligible to apply for TAA)
of the Trade Act have been met.
TA–W No.
Subject firm
Location
Impact date
72,947 ...............
74,425 ...............
Supreme Foam, Inc ..........................................................................
Douglas Corporation, Leased Workers Masterson Personnel, Just
in Case, etc.
Alumax Service Center, Division of SAPA Extrusions, Leased
Workers of Manpower Temporary.
Interstate Electronics Corp., L–3 Communications, Leased Workers of Bently Global Resources, etc.
Lear Corporation ..............................................................................
Archdale, NC ..............................
Eden Prairie, MN ........................
November 17, 2008.
July 22, 2009.
Riverside, MO .............................
July 15, 2009.
Anaheim, CA ...............................
August 31, 2009.
Louisville, KY ..............................
September 3, 2009.
74,471 ...............
74,592 ...............
74,600 ...............
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(c) (downstream producer for a firm
whose workers are certified eligible to
apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have
been met.
TA–W No.
Subject firm
Location
74,569 ...............
Titus Transportation, LP ...................................................................
Denton, TX ..................................
Negative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the
investigation revealed that the eligibility
criteria for worker adjustment assistance
have not been met for the reasons
specified.
The investigation revealed that the
criterion under paragraph (a)(1), or
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
TA–W No.
Subject firm
73,846 ...............
74,191 ...............
74,506 ...............
AT&T Operations, Inc., Network Management Center ....................
Pennsylvania Railcar—Plant #2, dba Railcar Services Company ...
Acxiom CDC Corporation .................................................................
The investigation revealed that the
criteria under paragraphs (a)(2)(A)(i)
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:01 Oct 14, 2010
Jkt 223001
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
August 24, 2009
(b)(1), or (c)(1)(employment decline or
threat of separation) of section 222 has
not been met.
Location
Impact date
Boulder, CO.
West Middlesex, PA.
Chicago, IL.
(decline in sales or production, or both)
and (a)(2)(B) (shift in production or
PO 00000
Impact date
services to a foreign country) of section
222 have not been met.
E:\FR\FM\15OCN1.SGM
15OCN1
63512
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 199 / Friday, October 15, 2010 / Notices
TA–W No.
Subject firm
74,564 ...............
Ally Financial Incorporated, Motor Acceptance Corp. (GMAC),
Auctioneering Unit, Darlington Auto Auction.
The investigation revealed that the
criteria under paragraphs(a)(2)(A)
Location
Subject firm
72,765 ...............
Mount Vernon Consulting, LLC, Workers’ Wages Were Reported
Under 14 W. Administrative Services, Agora, Inc.
Roddie Trucking, LLC, SWR, Inc. ....................................................
Saint Barnabas Health Care System, Patient Accounting Dept.,
Leased Workers, Liberty and Tritech.
Cemex Construction Materials Atlantic, LLC, Wampum Cement
Plant.
Parker Paint Company .....................................................................
United Steelworkers Local 746L ......................................................
United Auto Workers Local 2166, UAW ..........................................
73,395 ...............
73,972 ...............
74,040 ...............
74,136 ...............
74,320 ...............
74,528 ...............
Determinations Terminating
Investigations of Petitions for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
After notice of the petitions was
published in the Federal Register and
San Angelo, TX.
Ocean Port, NJ.
Wampum, PA.
Beaverton, OR.
Tyler, TX.
Shreveport, LA.
on the Department’s Web site, as
required by Section 221 of the Act (19
U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated
investigations of these petitions.
74,248 ...............
EDS, an HP Company (Re-Branded as HP—Enterprise Services),
Virtual Workers Across the United States.
JohnsonDiversey ..............................................................................
The following determinations
terminating investigations were issued
because the petitioning groups of
Santa Cruz, CA.
workers are covered by active
certifications. Consequently, further
investigation in these cases would serve
74,603 ...............
Thermo EGS Gauging, Inc., Field Service Engineers .....................
Dated: October 8, 2010.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010–26014 Filed 10–14–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:01 Oct 14, 2010
Jkt 223001
Investigations Regarding Certifications
of Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
Petitions have been filed with the
Secretary of Labor under Section 221(a)
of the Trade Act of 1974 (‘‘the Act’’) and
are identified in the Appendix to this
notice. Upon receipt of these petitions,
the Director of the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance, Employment
and Training Administration, has
instituted investigations pursuant to
Section 221(a) of the Act.
The purpose of each of the
investigations is to determine whether
the workers are eligible to apply for
adjustment assistance under Title II,
Chapter 2, of the Act. The investigations
will further relate, as appropriate, to the
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Impact date
Wilmington, MA.
Employment and Training
Administration
Frm 00080
no purpose since the petitioning group
of workers cannot be covered by more
than one certification at a time.
Location
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
PO 00000
Impact date
Palo Alto, CA.
Subject firm
I hereby certify that the
aforementioned determinations were
issued during the period of September
27, 2010 through October 1, 2010.
Copies of these determinations may be
requested under the Freedom of
Information Act. Requests may be
submitted by fax, courier services, or
mail to FOIA Disclosure Officer, Office
of Trade Adjustment Assistance (ETA),
U.S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20210 or tofoiarequest@dol.gov.
These determinations also are available
on the Department’s Web site at
https://www.doleta.gov/tradeact under
the searchable listing of determinations.
The following determinations
terminating investigations were issued
because the petitioner has requested
that the petition be withdrawn.
Location
TA–W No.
Impact date
Baltimore, MD.
Subject firm
74,343 ...............
country) of section 222 have not been
met.
Location
TA–W No.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Darlington, SC.
(increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift
in production or services to a foreign
TA–W No.
Impact date
determination of the date on which total
or partial separations began or
threatened to begin and the subdivision
of the firm involved.
The petitioners or any other persons
showing a substantial interest in the
subject matter of the investigations may
request a public hearing, provided such
request is filed in writing with the
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment
Assistance, at the address shown below,
not later than October 25, 2010.
Interested persons are invited to
submit written comments regarding the
subject matter of the investigations to
the Director, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance, at the address
shown below, not later than October 25,
2010.
Copies of these petitions may be
requested under the Freedom of
Information Act. Requests may be
submitted by fax, courier services, or
mail, to FOIA Disclosure Officer, Office
E:\FR\FM\15OCN1.SGM
15OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 199 (Friday, October 15, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63509-63512]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-26014]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment
assistance for workers by (TA-W) number issued during the period of
September 27, 2010 through October 1, 2010.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to
apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility
requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the following must be satisfied:
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) The sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased
absolutely; and
(3) One of the following must be satisfied:
(A) Imports of articles or services like or directly competitive
with articles produced or services supplied by such firm have
increased;
(B) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles
into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are
directly incorporated, have increased;
(C) Imports of articles directly incorporating one or more
component parts produced outside the United States that are like or
directly competitive with imports of articles incorporating one or more
component parts produced by such firm have increased;
[[Page 63510]]
(D) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles
which are produced directly using services supplied by such firm, have
increased; and
(4) The increase in imports contributed importantly to such
workers' separation or threat of separation and to the decline in the
sales or production of such firm; or
II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the following must be satisfied:
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) One of the following must be satisfied:
(A) There has been a shift by the workers' firm to a foreign
country in the production of articles or supply of services like or
directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm;
(B) There has been an acquisition from a foreign country by the
workers' firm of articles/services that are like or directly
competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm; and
(3) The shift/acquisition contributed importantly to the workers'
separation or threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in public agencies and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must
be met.
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the public
agency have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to
become totally or partially separated;
(2) The public agency has acquired from a foreign country services
like or directly competitive with services which are supplied by such
agency; and
(3) The acquisition of services contributed importantly to such
workers' separation or threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected secondary workers of a firm and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(c) of the Act must
be met.
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) The workers' firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a
firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of
eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, and such supply or
production is related to the article or service that was the basis for
such certification; and
(3) either--
(A) The workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it
supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least
20 percent of the production or sales of the workers' firm; or
(B) A loss of business by the workers' firm with the firm described
in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers' separation or
threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in firms identified by the International Trade
Commission and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply
for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility
requirements of Section 222(f) of the Act must be met.
(1) The workers' firm is publicly identified by name by the
International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an
investigation resulting in--
(A) An affirmative determination of serious injury or threat
thereof under section 202(b)(1);
(B) An affirmative determination of market disruption or threat
thereof under section 421(b)(1); or
(C) An affirmative final determination of material injury or threat
thereof under section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A));
(2) The petition is filed during the 1-year period beginning on the
date on which--
(A) A summary of the report submitted to the President by the
International Trade Commission under section 202(f)(1) with respect to
the affirmative determination described in paragraph (1)(A) is
published in the Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); or
(B) Notice of an affirmative determination described in
subparagraph (1) is published in the Federal Register; and
(3) The workers have become totally or partially separated from the
workers' firm within--
(A) The 1-year period described in paragraph (2); or
(B) Notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the 1-year period preceding
the 1-year period described in paragraph (2).
Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been issued. The date following
the company name and location of each determination references the
impact date for all workers of such determination.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been
met.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
73,874..................... The Wise Company, Inc. (B&M Memphis, TN.......... April 6, 2009.
Seating).
73,877..................... L.A. Najarian, Inc......... Greene, NY........... March 29, 2009.
74,020..................... The Electric Materials North East, PA....... April 12, 2009.
Company, Subsidiary of
United Stars.
74,349..................... Belding Hausman, Inc., Emporia, VA.......... June 28, 2009.
Weldon Mill, Leased
Workers from Compensation
Management.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services) of the Trade Act
have been met.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
73,621..................... Thermo Fisher Hamilton, Two Rivers, WI....... March 2, 2009.
Subsidiary of Thermo
Fisher Scientific, Lab
Works Stations Division.
[[Page 63511]]
74,272..................... Medtronic, Inc., Cardiac Mounds View, MN...... June 21, 2009.
Rhythm Disease Management,
Leased Workers of
Advantage Technical, etc.
74,337..................... Certegy Check Services, West Valley City, UT. June 30, 2009.
Inc., Fidelity National
Payment Services, Leased
Workers from Appleone.
74,385..................... Mermec, Inc., FKA ImageMap, Columbia, SC......... July 13, 2009.
Inc., Leased Worker from
Modis, Inc.
74,464..................... BreconRidge Manufacturing Ogdensburg, NY....... July 29, 2009.
Solutions, Sanmina-SCI
Corporation, Leased
Workers from Kelly
Services and Penski.
74,467..................... Zach System Corporation, La Porte, TX......... August 3, 2009.
Zach System SPA, Leased
Workers of Turner
Industries and Go.
74,491..................... Acme Electric, Actuant Lumberton, NC........ August 15, 2010.
Corporation, Leased
Workers From Mega Force
Staffing.
74,504..................... American Girl Brands, LLC, Middleton, WI........ August 6, 2009.
Subsidiary of Mattel, Inc.
74,517..................... Hotels.Com, An Expedia, Arlington, TX........ July 31, 2009.
Inc. Company, Latam.
74,556..................... Telair International, Simi Valley, CA...... July 20, 2009.
Incorporated, Nordisk
Aviation Products Division.
74,567..................... Janssen R&D and Janssen Springhouse, PA...... August 24, 2009.
Pharmaceutical Supply
Group, Divisions of J&J.
74,580..................... Fiskars Brands, Inc., Sauk City, WI........ August 31, 2009.
Garden Division, On-Site
Leased Workers of QTI.
74,580A.................... Fiskars Brands, Inc., Wausau, WI........... August 31, 2009.
School, Office and Craft
Division, On-Site Leased
Workers of Manpower.
74,585..................... Georgia-Pacific Wood Grenada, MS.......... August 26, 2009.
Products LLC.
74,606..................... Watson Laboratories, Inc., Carmel, NY........... September 3, 2009.
Watson Pharmaceuticals,
Danbury Pharmacal, Leased
Workers Adecco Staffing.
74,621..................... Burgess-Norton Claremore, OK........ September 10, 2009.
Manufacturing Company,
Inc., Leased Workers from
Selectremedy and Manpower.
74,657..................... STMicroelectronics, Inc.... Phoenix, AZ.......... October 31, 2010.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(c) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible
to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
72,947..................... Supreme Foam, Inc.......... Archdale, NC......... November 17, 2008.
74,425..................... Douglas Corporation, Leased Eden Prairie, MN..... July 22, 2009.
Workers Masterson
Personnel, Just in Case,
etc.
74,471..................... Alumax Service Center, Riverside, MO........ July 15, 2009.
Division of SAPA
Extrusions, Leased Workers
of Manpower Temporary.
74,592..................... Interstate Electronics Anaheim, CA.......... August 31, 2009.
Corp., L-3 Communications,
Leased Workers of Bently
Global Resources, etc.
74,600..................... Lear Corporation........... Louisville, KY....... September 3, 2009.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(c) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are
certified eligible to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
74,569..................... Titus Transportation, LP... Denton, TX........... August 24, 2009
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the
eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met
for the reasons specified.
The investigation revealed that the criterion under paragraph
(a)(1), or (b)(1), or (c)(1)(employment decline or threat of
separation) of section 222 has not been met.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
73,846..................... AT&T Operations, Inc., Boulder, CO..........
Network Management Center.
74,191..................... Pennsylvania Railcar--Plant West Middlesex, PA...
2, dba Railcar
Services Company.
74,506..................... Acxiom CDC Corporation..... Chicago, IL..........
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The investigation revealed that the criteria under paragraphs
(a)(2)(A)(i) (decline in sales or production, or both) and (a)(2)(B)
(shift in production or services to a foreign country) of section 222
have not been met.
[[Page 63512]]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
74,564..................... Ally Financial Darlington, SC.......
Incorporated, Motor
Acceptance Corp. (GMAC),
Auctioneering Unit,
Darlington Auto Auction.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The investigation revealed that the criteria under
paragraphs(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift in
production or services to a foreign country) of section 222 have not
been met.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
72,765..................... Mount Vernon Consulting, Baltimore, MD........
LLC, Workers' Wages Were
Reported Under 14 W.
Administrative Services,
Agora, Inc.
73,395..................... Roddie Trucking, LLC, SWR, San Angelo, TX.......
Inc..
73,972..................... Saint Barnabas Health Care Ocean Port, NJ.......
System, Patient Accounting
Dept., Leased Workers,
Liberty and Tritech.
74,040..................... Cemex Construction Wampum, PA...........
Materials Atlantic, LLC,
Wampum Cement Plant.
74,136..................... Parker Paint Company....... Beaverton, OR........
74,320..................... United Steelworkers Local Tyler, TX............
746L.
74,528..................... United Auto Workers Local Shreveport, LA.......
2166, UAW.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Determinations Terminating Investigations of Petitions for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
After notice of the petitions was published in the Federal Register
and on the Department's Web site, as required by Section 221 of the Act
(19 U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated investigations of these
petitions.
The following determinations terminating investigations were issued
because the petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
74,248..................... EDS, an HP Company (Re- Palo Alto, CA........
Branded as HP--Enterprise
Services), Virtual Workers
Across the United States.
74,343..................... JohnsonDiversey............ Santa Cruz, CA.......
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following determinations terminating investigations were issued
because the petitioning groups of workers are covered by active
certifications. Consequently, further investigation in these cases
would serve no purpose since the petitioning group of workers cannot be
covered by more than one certification at a time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
74,603..................... Thermo EGS Gauging, Inc., Wilmington, MA.......
Field Service Engineers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued
during the period of September 27, 2010 through October 1, 2010. Copies
of these determinations may be requested under the Freedom of
Information Act. Requests may be submitted by fax, courier services, or
mail to FOIA Disclosure Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance
(ETA), U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20210 or tofoiarequest@dol.gov. These determinations
also are available on the Department's Web site at https://www.doleta.gov/tradeact under the searchable listing of determinations.
Dated: October 8, 2010.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-26014 Filed 10-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P