Reports, Forms and Record Keeping Requirements, 62625-62627 [2010-25485]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 196 / Tuesday, October 12, 2010 / Notices
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
order on stainless steel sheet and strip
in coils from Mexico (identified as cases
6 through 11 in the Annex to Mexico’s
request), and any subsequent
amendments to the same, in which
margins of dumping for cash deposit
purposes and assessment amounts are
calculated using simple zeroing;
(ii) The 2005 and 2010 five-year
‘‘sunset’’ reviews of the antidumping
order on stainless steel sheet and strip
in coils from Mexico (identified as cases
12 and 13 in the Annex to Mexico’s
request), and any subsequent
amendments to the same, in which the
USDOC relied upon margins of
dumping calculated using simple
zeroing;
(iii) All other subsequent closely
connected measures taken by the United
States in relation to the antidumping
order on stainless steel sheet and strip
in coils from Mexico in which USDOC
calculated, or relied upon, margins of
dumping calculated using simple
zeroing or model zeroing, including the
negative ‘‘absence of dumping’’
revocation determinations pursuant
made in the 7th and 9th administrative
reviews (identified as cases 7 and 9 in
the Annex to Mexico’s request), and any
subsequent amendments to the same;
and
(iv) Any other determinations and
measures that derive mechanically from
the measures described in paragraphs (i)
to (iii) that bear a close nexus to the
referenced five originally challenged
administrative reviews including any
instructions and notices issued pursuant
thereto, and any subsequent
amendments to the same.
Finally, Mexico alleges that U.S.
measures taken to comply, if and to the
extent they exist, are inconsistent with
Articles 2.1, 2.4, 9.3, 11.2, and 11.3 of
the Antidumping Agreement and
Articles II:1(a), II:1(b), VI:1, and VI:2 of
the GATT 1994.
Public Comment: Requirements for
Submissions
Interested persons are invited to
submit written comments concerning
the issues raised in this dispute. Persons
may submit public comments
electronically to https://
www.regulations.gov docket number
USTR–2010–0025. If you are unable to
submit comments using https://
www.regulations.gov, please contact
Sandy McKinzy at (202) 395–9483 to
arrange for an alternative method of
transmission.
To submit comments via https://
www.regulations.gov, enter docket
number USTR–2010–0025 on the home
page and click ‘‘search.’’ The site will
provide a search-results page listing all
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:43 Oct 08, 2010
Jkt 223001
documents associated with this docket.
Find a reference to this notice by
selecting ‘‘Notice’’ under ‘‘Document
Type’’ on the left side of the search
results page, and click on the link
entitled ‘‘Submit a Comment.’’ (For
further information on using the
https://www.regulations.gov Web site,
please consult the resources provided
on the Web site by clicking on the
‘‘Help’’ link at the top of the home page.)
The https://www.regulations.gov Web
site provides the option of providing
comments by filling in a ‘‘Type
Comment and Upload File’’ field, or by
attaching a document. It is expected that
most comments will be provided in an
attached document. If a document is
attached, it is necessary and sufficient to
type ‘‘See attached’’ in the ‘‘Type
Comment and Upload File’’ field.
A person requesting that information
contained in a comment submitted by
that person be treated as business
confidential information must certify
that such information is business
confidential and would not customarily
be released to the public by the
submitter. Business confidential
information must be clearly designated
as such and the submission must be
marked ‘‘BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL’’ at
the top and bottom of the cover page
and each succeeding page. Any
comment containing business
confidential information must be
submitted by fax to Sandy McKinzy at
(202) 395–3640. A non-confidential
summary of the confidential
information must be submitted to
https://www.regulations.gov. The nonconfidential summary will be placed in
the docket and open to public
inspection.
Information or advice contained in a
comment submitted, other than business
confidential information, may be
determined by USTR to be confidential
in accordance with section 135(g)(2) of
the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C.
2155(g)(2)). If the submitter believes that
information or advice may qualify as
such, the submitter—
(1) Must clearly so designate the
information or advice;
(2) Must clearly mark the material as
‘‘SUBMITTED IN CONFIDENCE’’ at the
top and bottom of the cover page and
each succeeding page; and
(3) Must provide a non-confidential
summary of the information or advice.
Any comment containing confidential
information must be submitted by fax to
Sandy McKinzy at (202) 395–3640. A
non-confidential summary of the
confidential information must be
submitted to www.regulations.gov. The
non-confidential summary will be
PO 00000
Frm 00128
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
62625
placed in the docket and open to public
inspection.
USTR will maintain a docket on this
dispute settlement proceeding
accessible to the public. The public file
will include non-confidential comments
received by USTR from the public with
respect to the dispute. If a dispute
settlement panel is convened or in the
event of an appeal from such a panel,
the U.S. submissions, any nonconfidential submissions, or nonconfidential summaries of submissions,
received from other participants in the
dispute, will be made available to the
public on USTR’s Web site at https://
www.ustr.gov, and the report of the
panel, and, if applicable, the report of
the Appellate Body, will be available on
the Web site of the World Trade
Organization, https://www.wto.org.
Comments will be placed in the
docket and open to public inspection
pursuant to 15 CFR 2006.13, except
confidential business information
exempt from public inspection in
accordance with 15 CFR 2006.15 or
information determined by USTR to be
confidential in accordance with 19
U.S.C. 2155(g)(2). Comments open to
public inspection may be viewed on the
https://www.regulations.gov Web site.
Steven F. Fabry,
Assistant United States Trade Representative
for Monitoring and Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2010–25638 Filed 10–8–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3190–W1–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2010–0126]
Reports, Forms and Record Keeping
Requirements
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed extension,
without change, of a currently approved
collection of information.
AGENCY:
Before a Federal agency can
collect certain information from the
public, the agency must receive
approval from the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB). Under procedures
established by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.),
before seeking OMB approval, Federal
agencies must solicit public comment
on proposed collections of information,
including extensions and reinstatements
of previously approved collections. In
compliance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, this notice
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\12OCN1.SGM
12OCN1
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
62626
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 196 / Tuesday, October 12, 2010 / Notices
describes one collection of information
for which NHTSA intends to seek OMB
approval, relating to confidential
business information.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before December 13, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
to the docket number identified in the
heading of this document by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
M–30, U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building, Ground
Floor, Rm. W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., between
9 am and 5 pm Eastern Time, Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
Regardless of how you submit your
comments, please be sure to mention
the docket number of this document and
cite OMB Clearance No. 2127–0025, ‘‘49
CFR Part 512, Confidential Business
Information.’’
You may call the Docket at (202) 366–
9322.
Note that all comments received will
be posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. Please
see the Privacy Act discussion below.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
questions contact Nicholas Englund in
the Office of the Chief Counsel at the
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, telephone (202) 366–
5263.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
before an agency submits a proposed
collection of information to OMB for
approval, it must publish a document in
the Federal Register providing a 60-day
comment period and otherwise consult
with members of the public and affected
agencies concerning each proposed
collection of information. The OMB has
promulgated regulations describing
what must be included in such a
document. Under OMB’s regulations (at
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:43 Oct 08, 2010
Jkt 223001
5 CFR 1320.8(d)), an agency must ask
for public comment on the following:
(i) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(ii) the accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
(iii) how to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(iv) how to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including the use
of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
In compliance with these
requirements, NHTSA asks for public
comment on the following extension of
clearance for a currently approved
collection of information:
Confidential Business Information
Type of Request—Extension of
clearance.
OMB Clearance Number—2127–0025.
Form Number—This collection of
information uses no standard forms.
Requested Expiration Date of
Approval—Three (3) years from the date
of approval of the collection.
Summary of the Collection of
Information—Persons who submit
information to the agency and seek to
have the agency withhold some or all of
that information from disclosure under
the Freedom of Information Act
(‘‘FOIA’’), 5 U.S.C. 552, must provide the
agency with sufficient support that
justifies the confidential treatment of
that information. In addition, a request
for confidential treatment must be
accompanied by: (1) A complete copy of
the submission; (2) a copy of the
submission containing only those
portions for which confidentiality is not
sought with the confidential portions
redacted; and (3) either a second
complete copy of the submission or
alternatively those portions of the
submission that contain the information
for which confidentiality is sought.
Furthermore, the requestor must submit
a completed certification as provided in
49 CFR Part 512, Appendix A. See
generally 49 CFR Part 512 (NHTSA
Confidential Business Information
regulations).
Part 512 ensures that information
submitted under a claim of
confidentiality is properly evaluated in
an efficient manner under prevailing
PO 00000
Frm 00129
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
legal standards and, where appropriate,
accorded confidential treatment. To
facilitate the evaluation process, in their
requests for confidential treatment,
submitters of information may make
reference to certain limited classes of
information that are presumptively
treated as confidential, such as
blueprints and engineering drawings,
future specific model plans (under
limited conditions), and future vehicle
production or sales figures for specific
models (under limited conditions).
Further, most early warning reporting
(EWR) data are confidential under class
determinations provided in 49 CFR Part
512, with the exception of information
on death, injury, and property damage
claims and notices, which would be
handled on an individual basis
according to the procedures of Part 512
and are, therefore, covered by this
notice. 72 FR 59434 (Oct. 19, 2007).
Description of the Need for the
Information and Use of the
Information—NHTSA receives
confidential information for use in its
activities, which include investigations,
rulemaking actions, program planning
and management, and program
evaluation. The information is needed
to ensure the agency has sufficient
relevant information for decisionmaking in connection with these
activities. Some of this information is
submitted voluntarily, as in rulemaking,
and some is submitted in response to
compulsory information requests, as in
investigations.
Description of the Likely Respondents,
Including Estimated Number and
Proposed Frequency of Response to the
Collection of Information—This
collection of information applies to
entities that submit to the agency
information that the entities wish to
have withheld from disclosure under
the FOIA. Thus, the collection of
information applies to entities that are
subject to laws administered by the
agency or agency regulations and are
under an obligation to provide
information to the agency. It also
includes entities that voluntarily submit
information to the agency. Such entities
would include manufacturers of motor
vehicles and of motor vehicle
equipment. Importers are considered to
be manufacturers. It may also include
other entities that are involved with
motor vehicles or motor vehicle
equipment but are not manufacturers.
Estimate of the Total Annual
Reporting and Recordkeeping Burdens
Resulting from the Collection of
Information—3,600 hours.
The agency receives requests for
confidential treatment that vary in size
from requests that ask the agency to
E:\FR\FM\12OCN1.SGM
12OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 196 / Tuesday, October 12, 2010 / Notices
withhold as little as a portion of one
page to multiple boxes of documents.
NHTSA estimates that it will take on
average approximately eight (8) hours
for an entity to prepare a submission
requesting confidential treatment. This
estimate will vary based on the size of
the submission, with smaller and
voluntary submissions taking
considerably less time to prepare. The
agency based this estimate on the
volume of requests received over the
past three years.
NHTSA estimates that it will receive
approximately 450 requests for
confidential treatment annually. This
figure is based on the average number of
requests received over the past three
years. We selected this period because
it provides an estimate based on
incoming requests for the most recent
three years. The agency estimates that
the total burden for this information
collection will be approximately 3,600
hours, which is based on the number of
requests (450) multiplied by the
estimated number of hours to prepare
each submission (8 hours).
Since nothing in the rule requires
those persons who request confidential
treatment pursuant to Part 512 to keep
copies of any records or requests
submitted to us, recordkeeping costs
imposed would be zero hours and zero
costs.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3506; delegation of
authority at 49 CFR 1.50.
Issued on: October 4, 2010.
O. Kevin Vincent,
Chief Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2010–25485 Filed 10–8–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Notice of Cancellation of Preparation
of Environmental Impact Statement for
the Tucson International Airport,
Tucson, Pima County, AZ
Federal Aviation
Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of cancellation of
preparation of environmental impact
statement.
AGENCY:
The Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) announces that it
has decided to discontinue preparation
of an Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) for the proposed relocation of
Runway 11R/29L and associated
development at Tucson International
Airport. The FAA’s decision to
discontinue preparation of the EIS is
based upon the results from a planning
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:43 Oct 08, 2010
Jkt 223001
effort completed by the Tucson Airport
Authority (TAA), the owner and
operator of the airport. This planning
effort reveled the project purpose and
need has changed significantly. As a
result, FAA has determined the new
runway proposal at Tucson
International Airport is not ripe for
decision at this time.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Roxana Hernandez, Environmental
Protection Specialist, Federal Aviation
Administration, Western-Pacific Region,
Los Angeles Airports District Office,
P.O. Box 92007, Los Angeles, CA
90009–2007, Telephone: (310) 725–
3614.
On
October 13, 2005, the FAA, published in
the Federal Register a Notice of Intent
to prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) and hold a Public
Scoping Meeting at Tucson
International Airport (Volume 70,
Number 197, FR 59800–59801). The EIS
and Public Scoping Meeting were to
address the proposed relocation of
Runway 11R/29L and associated
development at airport.
In 2005, the FAA based its decision to
prepare the EIS on the procedures
described in FAA Order 5050.4A,
Airport Environmental Handbook, and
FAA Order 1050.1E, Environmental
Impacts: Policies and Procedures. FAA
also based its decision to prepare a
federal EIS primarily on TAA’s proposal
to relocate Runway 11R/29L, 450 feet to
the southwest, creating a centerline to
centerline separation of 1,156 feet
between the existing Runway 11L29R.
The length of the relocated Runway
11R/29L would have been 11,000 feet
long by 150 feet wide.
Recently, the TAA completed a
planning effort that reveled that the
project’s purpose and need changed
significantly. Therefore, when the TAA
submits a new Airport Layout Plan with
a revised project depicted on it, the FAA
will determine the appropriate National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
documentation necessary to assess the
environmental effects of those
improvements pursuant to FAA Order
5050.4B, National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA) Implementing Instructions
for Airport Actions, and FAA Order
1050.1E, Environmental Impacts:
Policies and Procedures.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Issued in Hawthorne, California on
September 30, 2010.
Debbie Roth,
Acting Manager, Airports Division, Western—
Pacific Region, AWP–600.
[FR Doc. 2010–25483 Filed 10–8–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
PO 00000
Frm 00130
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
62627
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Environmental Impact Statement;
Davis County, UT
Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of Intent.
AGENCY:
FWHA is issuing this notice
to advise the public that an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
will be prepared for proposed
transportation improvements in Davis
County, Utah.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Edward Woolford, Environmental
Program Manager, Federal Highway
Administration, 2520 West 4700 South,
Suite 9A, Salt Lake City, Utah 84118,
Telephone: (801) 955–3500, e-mail
Edward.Woolford@dot.gov; or Charles
Mace, Project Manager, Utah
Department of Transportation, Region
One Office, 166 West Southwell Street,
Ogden, UT 84404–4194, Telephone:
(801) 620–1685, e-mail
cmace@utah.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FWHA, in
cooperation with the Utah Department
of Transportation (UDOT), will prepare
an EIS on a proposal to address current
and projected traffic demand on 1800
North (SR–37) in the cities of Clinton
and Sunset in Davis County, Utah. The
proposed project area extends from 2000
West to I–15 along 1800 North, a
distance of approximately 2 miles.
Transportation improvements in this
area are needed to address current and
projected 2040 traffic demand along the
existing two-lane 1800 North corridor,
provide better east-west access, and
improve safety.
The FHWA will consider a reasonable
range of alternatives that meet the
project purpose and need and are based
on agency and public input. These
alternatives include: (1) Taking no
action; (2) using alternate travel modes;
(3) upgrading and adding lanes to the
existing roadway network, including
1800 North; (4) a grade separation at the
Union Pacific Railroad crossing on 1800
North; (5) a new interchange on I–15 at
1800 North; (6) improving adjacent
interchanges on I–15; (7) combinations
of any of the above; and (8) other
feasible alternatives identified during
the scoping process.
A Coordination Plan is being prepared
to define the agency and public
participation procedure for the
environmental review process. The plan
will outline how agencies and the
public will provide input during the
scoping process, the development of the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\12OCN1.SGM
12OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 12, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62625-62627]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25485]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA-2010-0126]
Reports, Forms and Record Keeping Requirements
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed extension, without change, of a currently
approved collection of information.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Before a Federal agency can collect certain information from
the public, the agency must receive approval from the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB). Under procedures established by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), before
seeking OMB approval, Federal agencies must solicit public comment on
proposed collections of information, including extensions and
reinstatements of previously approved collections. In compliance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this notice
[[Page 62626]]
describes one collection of information for which NHTSA intends to seek
OMB approval, relating to confidential business information.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before December 13, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments to the docket number identified in
the heading of this document by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, M-30, U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building, Ground Floor, Rm. W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., between 9 am and 5 pm Eastern
Time, Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Regardless of how you submit your comments, please be sure to
mention the docket number of this document and cite OMB Clearance No.
2127-0025, ``49 CFR Part 512, Confidential Business Information.''
You may call the Docket at (202) 366-9322.
Note that all comments received will be posted without change to
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided. Please see the Privacy Act discussion below.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions contact Nicholas Englund
in the Office of the Chief Counsel at the National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, telephone (202) 366-5263.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
before an agency submits a proposed collection of information to OMB
for approval, it must publish a document in the Federal Register
providing a 60-day comment period and otherwise consult with members of
the public and affected agencies concerning each proposed collection of
information. The OMB has promulgated regulations describing what must
be included in such a document. Under OMB's regulations (at 5 CFR
1320.8(d)), an agency must ask for public comment on the following:
(i) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have practical utility;
(ii) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(iii) how to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
(iv) how to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses.
In compliance with these requirements, NHTSA asks for public
comment on the following extension of clearance for a currently
approved collection of information:
Confidential Business Information
Type of Request--Extension of clearance.
OMB Clearance Number--2127-0025.
Form Number--This collection of information uses no standard forms.
Requested Expiration Date of Approval--Three (3) years from the
date of approval of the collection.
Summary of the Collection of Information--Persons who submit
information to the agency and seek to have the agency withhold some or
all of that information from disclosure under the Freedom of
Information Act (``FOIA''), 5 U.S.C. 552, must provide the agency with
sufficient support that justifies the confidential treatment of that
information. In addition, a request for confidential treatment must be
accompanied by: (1) A complete copy of the submission; (2) a copy of
the submission containing only those portions for which confidentiality
is not sought with the confidential portions redacted; and (3) either a
second complete copy of the submission or alternatively those portions
of the submission that contain the information for which
confidentiality is sought. Furthermore, the requestor must submit a
completed certification as provided in 49 CFR Part 512, Appendix A. See
generally 49 CFR Part 512 (NHTSA Confidential Business Information
regulations).
Part 512 ensures that information submitted under a claim of
confidentiality is properly evaluated in an efficient manner under
prevailing legal standards and, where appropriate, accorded
confidential treatment. To facilitate the evaluation process, in their
requests for confidential treatment, submitters of information may make
reference to certain limited classes of information that are
presumptively treated as confidential, such as blueprints and
engineering drawings, future specific model plans (under limited
conditions), and future vehicle production or sales figures for
specific models (under limited conditions). Further, most early warning
reporting (EWR) data are confidential under class determinations
provided in 49 CFR Part 512, with the exception of information on
death, injury, and property damage claims and notices, which would be
handled on an individual basis according to the procedures of Part 512
and are, therefore, covered by this notice. 72 FR 59434 (Oct. 19,
2007).
Description of the Need for the Information and Use of the
Information--NHTSA receives confidential information for use in its
activities, which include investigations, rulemaking actions, program
planning and management, and program evaluation. The information is
needed to ensure the agency has sufficient relevant information for
decision-making in connection with these activities. Some of this
information is submitted voluntarily, as in rulemaking, and some is
submitted in response to compulsory information requests, as in
investigations.
Description of the Likely Respondents, Including Estimated Number
and Proposed Frequency of Response to the Collection of Information--
This collection of information applies to entities that submit to the
agency information that the entities wish to have withheld from
disclosure under the FOIA. Thus, the collection of information applies
to entities that are subject to laws administered by the agency or
agency regulations and are under an obligation to provide information
to the agency. It also includes entities that voluntarily submit
information to the agency. Such entities would include manufacturers of
motor vehicles and of motor vehicle equipment. Importers are considered
to be manufacturers. It may also include other entities that are
involved with motor vehicles or motor vehicle equipment but are not
manufacturers.
Estimate of the Total Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping Burdens
Resulting from the Collection of Information--3,600 hours.
The agency receives requests for confidential treatment that vary
in size from requests that ask the agency to
[[Page 62627]]
withhold as little as a portion of one page to multiple boxes of
documents. NHTSA estimates that it will take on average approximately
eight (8) hours for an entity to prepare a submission requesting
confidential treatment. This estimate will vary based on the size of
the submission, with smaller and voluntary submissions taking
considerably less time to prepare. The agency based this estimate on
the volume of requests received over the past three years.
NHTSA estimates that it will receive approximately 450 requests for
confidential treatment annually. This figure is based on the average
number of requests received over the past three years. We selected this
period because it provides an estimate based on incoming requests for
the most recent three years. The agency estimates that the total burden
for this information collection will be approximately 3,600 hours,
which is based on the number of requests (450) multiplied by the
estimated number of hours to prepare each submission (8 hours).
Since nothing in the rule requires those persons who request
confidential treatment pursuant to Part 512 to keep copies of any
records or requests submitted to us, recordkeeping costs imposed would
be zero hours and zero costs.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3506; delegation of authority at 49 CFR
1.50.
Issued on: October 4, 2010.
O. Kevin Vincent,
Chief Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2010-25485 Filed 10-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P