Proposed Exemptions From Certain Prohibited Transaction Restrictions, 61932-61957 [2010-24892]
Download as PDF
61932
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 6, 2010 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employee Benefits Security
Administration
Proposed Exemptions From Certain
Prohibited Transaction Restrictions
Employee Benefits Security
Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Notice of Proposed Exemptions.
AGENCY:
This document contains
notices of pendency before the
Department of Labor (the Department) of
proposed exemptions from certain of the
prohibited transaction restrictions of the
Employee Retirement Income Security
Act of 1974 (ERISA or the Act) and/or
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the
Code).
This notice includes the following
proposed exemptions: D–11576, Bank of
America, NA et al.; D–11591, Citigroup
Inc. and its affiliates (Citigroup), the
Citigroup 401(k) Plan, the Citibuilder
401(k) Plan for Puerto Rico the
(Citibuilder Plan) and collectively with
the Citigroup 401(k) Plan, the
Participant Directed Plans, the Citigroup
Pension Plan (and collectively with the
Participant Directed Plans, the Plans)
(the Applicants); and D–11611, The
West Coast Bancorp 401(k) Plan (the
Plan); et al.
DATES: All interested persons are invited
to submit written comments or requests
for a hearing on the pending
exemptions, unless otherwise stated in
the Notice of Proposed Exemption,
within 45 days from the date of
publication of this Federal Register
Notice.
ADDRESSES: Comments and requests for
a hearing should state: (1) The name,
address, and telephone number of the
person making the comment or request,
and (2) the nature of the person’s
interest in the exemption and the
manner in which the person would be
adversely affected by the exemption. A
request for a hearing must also state the
issues to be addressed and include a
general description of the evidence to be
presented at the hearing.
All written comments and requests for
a hearing (at least three copies) should
be sent to the Employee Benefits
Security Administration (EBSA), Office
of Exemption Determinations, Room N–
5700, U.S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20210. Attention: Application No.
__, stated in each Notice of Proposed
Exemption. Interested persons are also
invited to submit comments and/or
hearing requests to EBSA via e-mail or
FAX. Any such comments or requests
should be sent either by e-mail to:
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES2
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:35 Oct 05, 2010
Jkt 223001
‘‘moffitt.betty@dol.gov’’, or by FAX to
(202) 219–0204 by the end of the
scheduled comment period. The
applications for exemption and the
comments received will be available for
public inspection in the Public
Documents Room of the Employee
Benefits Security Administration, U.S.
Department of Labor, Room N–1513,
200 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20210.
Warning: If you submit written
comments or hearing requests, do not
include any personally-identifiable or
confidential business information that
you do not want to be publiclydisclosed. All comments and hearing
requests are posted on the Internet
exactly as they are received, and they
can be retrieved by most Internet search
engines. The Department will make no
deletions, modifications or redactions to
the comments or hearing requests
received, as they are public records.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Notice to Interested Persons
Notice of the proposed exemptions
will be provided to all interested
persons in the manner agreed upon by
the applicant and the Department
within 15 days of the date of publication
in the Federal Register. Such notice
shall include a copy of the notice of
proposed exemption as published in the
Federal Register and shall inform
interested persons of their right to
comment and to request a hearing
(where appropriate).
The proposed exemptions were
requested in applications filed pursuant
to section 408(a) of the Act and/or
section 4975(c)(2) of the Code, and in
accordance with procedures set forth in
29 CFR Part 2570, Subpart B (55 FR
32836, 32847, August 10, 1990).
Effective December 31, 1978, section
102 of Reorganization Plan No. 4 of
1978, 5 U.S.C. App. 1 (1996), transferred
the authority of the Secretary of the
Treasury to issue exemptions of the type
requested to the Secretary of Labor.
Therefore, these notices of proposed
exemption are issued solely by the
Department.
The applications contain
representations with regard to the
proposed exemptions which are
summarized below. Interested persons
are referred to the applications on file
with the Department for a complete
statement of the facts and
representations.
Bank of America, NA et al. Located in
Charlotte, North Carolina. Exemption
Application Number D–11576
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
Proposed Exemption
The Department is considering
granting an exemption under the
authority of section 408(a) of the
Employee Retirement Income Security
Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA or the
Act), and section 4975(c)(2) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the Code), and in accordance
with the procedures set forth in 29 CFR
Part 2570, Subpart B (55 FR 32836,
32847, August 10, 1990).1
Section I. Covered Transactions
If the proposed exemption is granted,
the restrictions of sections 406(a) and
406(b) of the Act and the sanctions
resulting from the application of 4975 of
the Code, by reason of section
4975(c)(1)(A) through (F) of the Code,
shall not apply: (a) Effective January 1,
2009: (1) To the operation of the RPT
Stable Value Agreements, pursuant to
the terms thereof, and to the receipt of
a fee by BANA in connection therewith;
and (2) to transactions under the RPT
Stable Value Agreements (the RPT
Wrap-Related Transactions); (b)
effective April 23, 2009: (1) To the
execution of the RPT Special Purpose
Wrap Agreement; (2) to the operation of
the RPT Special Purpose Wrap
Agreement, pursuant to the terms
thereof, and to the receipt of a fee by
BANA in connection therewith; and (3)
to transactions under the RPT Special
Purpose Wrap Agreement (the Special
Purpose Wrap-Related Transactions);
and (c) effective January 1, 2009: (1) To
the operation of the Separately Managed
Account Wrap Agreements, pursuant to
the terms thereof, and to the receipt of
a fee by BANA in connection therewith;
and (2) to transactions under the
Separately Managed Account Wrap
Agreements (the Separately Managed
Account Wrap-Related Transactions),
provided that the following conditions,
as applicable, have been met.
Section II. Conditions Applicable to
Transactions Described in Section I(a)
(a) Effective June 1, 2009, B1ackRock
Advisors may change the formula for
calculating the Crediting Rate with
respect to the Global Wrap Account or
the Global Buy and Hold Account
(either, a Global Account) only after
obtaining prior approval from:
(1) Each financial institution that has
entered into a wrap agreement covering
assets included in the applicable Global
Account; and
1 For purposes of this proposed exemption,
references to section 406 of ERISA should be read
to refer as well to the corresponding provisions of
section 4975 of the Code.
E:\FR\FM\06OCN2.SGM
06OCN2
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 6, 2010 / Notices
(2) The Independent Fiduciary, after
BlackRock Advisors has provided the
Independent Fiduciary with any
information that the Independent
Fiduciary has reasonably requested in
determining whether to approve the
proposed change in the Crediting Rate
formula;
(b) BANA may not reset a Crediting
Rate attributable to a Global Account
more frequently than on a monthly basis
unless:
(1) A crediting rate attributable to a
non-BANA wrap agreement covering
assets in the same Global Account is
reset more frequently than on a monthly
basis; and
(2) BANA resets the Crediting Rate at
the same time, and in the same manner,
as such other non-BANA wrap
agreement crediting rate;
(c) Each financial institution entering
into a wrap agreement covering assets
included in a Global Account obtains
information from BlackRock Advisors
on a monthly basis regarding the
investments included in such Global
Account. This information must be
sufficiently detailed to enable the
financial institution to independently
verify that the applicable Crediting Rate
was calculated properly;
(d) The fee received by BANA in
connection with the BANA RPT Global
Wrap Agreement or the BANA RPT Buy
and Hold Wrap Agreement will be
reasonable relative to market conditions
and risks, as determined annually by the
Independent Fiduciary.
Notwithstanding the above, in no event
shall the fee received by BANA under
the BANA RPT Global Wrap Agreement
or the BANA RPT Buy and Hold Wrap
Agreement exceed the maximum
percentage fee paid to any other
financial institution pursuant to a wrap
agreement covering assets in the
applicable Global Wrap Account or the
Global Buy and Hold Account, as
relevant;
(e) The Trustee may trigger
immunization with respect to the BANA
RPT Global Wrap Agreement only if:
(1) The Trustee triggers immunization
with respect to another wrap agreement
covering assets in the Global Wrap
Account immediately prior to, or at the
same time as, the Trustee triggers
immunization with respect to the BANA
RPT Global Wrap Agreement; or
(2) A financial institution not
affiliated with BANA triggers
immunization with respect to assets in
the Global Wrap Account immediately
prior to, or at the same time as, the
Trustee triggers immunization with
respect to the BANA RPT Global Wrap
Agreement; or
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:35 Oct 05, 2010
Jkt 223001
(3) The Trustee determines that
BANA is no longer financially
responsible and the Independent
Fiduciary determines that immunization
is in the interests of Plans invested in
RPT;
(f) Assets held in RPT will be valued
at their current fair market value on a
daily basis utilizing the following
BlackRock firm-wide approved
valuation process:
(1) Valuations will be performed
without regard to whether the security
is held in RPT or another account or
commingled vehicle advised by
BlackRock;
(2) Valuations will be based on the
price that may be obtained in a current
arm’s-length sale to an unrelated third
party;
(3) BlackRock will first obtain prices
for securities from independent thirdparty sources, including index
providers, broker-dealers and
independent pricing services.
BlackRock will maintain a hierarchy
that prioritizes pricing sources by asset
class or type and will value securities
based on the price generated by the
highest priority source. The hierarchy
may vary by asset class or type, but not
for a particular security;
(4) If no third-party sources are
available to value a security or the price
generated by the third-party falls
outside specified statistical norms and
after review BlackRock determines that
such price is not reliable, BlackRock
will value the security using an analytic
methodology in accordance with its
written valuation policy. If BlackRock
values a security using such analytic
methodology, the Independent
Fiduciary will review that methodology
and valuation and will obtain its own
valuation if it deems appropriate; and
(5) Values determined in accordance
with (1) through (4) above will be
provided to each financial institution
that has entered into a wrap agreement
covering assets in the Global Wrap
Account or the Global Buy and Hold
Account, as the case may be;
(g) Each financial institution that has
entered into a wrap agreement covering
assets in the Global Wrap Account and/
or the Global Buy and Hold Account,
including BANA, may raise an objection
regarding a particular security’s
valuation, regardless of the source of
such valuation. Once an objection is
raised, wrap providers other than BANA
may determine a new valuation for such
security and BANA must accept this
new valuation, provided that BANA is
given reasonably satisfactory
documentation supporting the new
valuation;
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
61933
(h) Prior to a Plan sponsor’s decision
to include RPT as an investment option
for its Plan’s participants, the Trustee
will provide the Plan sponsor with the
following:
(1) RPT’s Declaration of Trust (as
amended and restated as of April 23,
2009, and as may be further amended
from time to time);
(2) A purchase agreement to be
entered into by the Plan fiduciary and
the Trustee;
(3) Upon request, a copy of the
Annual Report for RPT and a fact sheet
describing RPT’s investment objective
and strategy and a performance analysis;
and
(4) A copy of this proposed exemption
or, if granted, a copy of the final
exemption;
(i) The Trustee will provide the
following ongoing disclosures to Plan
fiduciaries regarding a Plan’s
investment in RPT:
(1) The Annual Report for RPT; and
(2) The Plan’s Investment Summary
and Accounting;
(j) Plan participants will be provided
the following disclosures regarding their
investment in RPT:
(1) Prior to and following their initial
investment, information describing the
investment objectives and performance
of RPT; and
(2) A statement, delivered at least
quarterly, that sets forth the value of the
participant’s account contributions,
withdrawals, distributions, loans and
change in value since the prior
statement;
(k) The Independent Fiduciary must
receive a copy of any RPT Stable Value
Agreement amendment prior to the
effective date of such amendment. The
Independent Fiduciary must review and
approve the amendment prior to its
implementation, except that no such
review and approval shall be required
for an amendment that is purely
ministerial in nature;
(l) The dollar amount of Global Wrap
Account assets covered by the BANA
RPT Global Wrap Agreement shall not
exceed 50% of the total assets held in
such Account, and the terms associated
with the BANA RPT Global Wrap
Agreement at the time such Agreement
was entered into, amended, modified or
renewed shall be no less favorable to
RPT than the terms associated with
comparable agreements with unrelated
parties;
(m) The dollar amount of Global Buy
and Hold Account assets covered by the
BANA RPT Buy and Hold Wrap
Agreement shall not exceed 60% of the
total assets held in such Account, and
the terms associated with the BANA
RPT Buy and Hold Wrap Agreement at
E:\FR\FM\06OCN2.SGM
06OCN2
61934
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 6, 2010 / Notices
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES2
the time such Agreement was entered
into, amended, modified or renewed
shall be no less favorable to RPT than
the terms associated with comparable
agreements with unrelated parties; and
(n) Any RPT Wrap-Related
Transaction that involves: (1) the
exercise by BANA, the Trustee, or
BlackRock Advisors of their rights
under the RPT Stable Value
Agreements; or (2) the performance by
BANA, the Trustee, or BlackRock of
their obligations under the RPT Stable
Value Agreements, shall be subject to
prior review and approval by the
Independent Fiduciary if such exercise
or performance affects the Crediting
Rate or would otherwise have an
adverse impact on the book value of a
participant’s or beneficiary’s investment
in RPT.
Section III. Conditions Applicable to
Transactions Described in Section I(b)
(a) Below Investment Grade Securities
will be transferred automatically to a
RPT account (the Type D1 Account) and
covered by the RPT Special Purpose
Wrap Agreement. The RPT Special
Purpose Wrap Agreement shall cover up
to in the aggregate $200 million of the
following:
(1) Book value of Downgraded
Securities that have not been sold; and/
or
(2) Aggregate unamortized realized
losses with respect to sold Downgraded
Securities;
(b) The Minimum Ratio shall be
maintained;
(c) The total book value of the assets
included in the Type D1 Account and
covered by the RPT Special Purpose
Wrap, including the Permitted
Securities, will not exceed $700 million
without the prior written consent of the
Trustee, BlackRock Advisors, BANA
and the Independent Fiduciary;
(d) The crediting rate with respect to
the Type D1 Account (the Type D1
Account Crediting Rate) shall be 0.00%
at times when there are unamortized
losses (whether realized or unrealized)
attributable to Downgraded Securities in
the Type D1 Account, calculated in
accordance with the provisions of the
RPT Special Purpose Wrap Agreement.
In the event there are no unamortized
losses (i.e., neither realized nor
unrealized) recorded to the Type D1
Account which relate to Downgraded
Securities, the Type D1 Account
Crediting Rate shall be determined in
accordance with a formula that has been
reviewed by the Independent Fiduciary;
(e) Effective June 1, 2009, BlackRock
Advisors may change the formula for
calculating the Type D1 Account
Crediting Rate only after obtaining prior
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:35 Oct 05, 2010
Jkt 223001
approval from BANA and the
Independent Fiduciary. BlackRock
Advisors shall provide the Independent
Fiduciary with any information it may
reasonably request in determining
whether to approve a proposed change
in the Type D1 Account Crediting Rate
formula;
(f) The Type D1 Account Crediting
Rate will not be reset more frequently
than on a monthly basis;
(g) Permitted Securities will have a
maximum duration of 3.5 years at the
time of purchase;
(h) The fee charged by BANA for the
RPT Special Purpose Wrap will be
reasonable relative to market conditions
and risks, as determined annually by the
Independent Fiduciary.
Notwithstanding the above, in no event
shall the fee received by BANA under
the BANA RPT Global Wrap Agreement
or the BANA RPT Buy and Hold Wrap
Agreement exceed the maximum
percentage fee paid to any other
financial institution pursuant to a wrap
agreement covering assets in the
applicable Global Wrap Account or the
Global Buy and Hold Account, as
relevant, as determined annually by the
Independent Fiduciary.
Notwithstanding the above, in no event
shall such fee exceed 15 basis points per
annum of the total book value of assets
included in the Type D1 Account;
(i) Assets covered by the RPT Special
Purpose Wrap Agreement will be valued
in accordance with the methodology
specified in section II(f) above,
provided, however, that if the
Independent Fiduciary obtains a
valuation, such valuation will be
binding on BANA;
(j) The Trustee has the right to
immunize the portfolio of securities
included in the Type D1 Account only
if BANA elects to terminate the RPT
Special Purpose Wrap Agreement, or if
BANA defaults under the RPT Special
Purpose Wrap Agreement. If an
immunization election becomes
effective (the RPT Special Purpose
Immunization Date), the RPT Special
Purpose Wrap Agreement would
terminate on the later of: (1) The date
that is the number of years after the RPT
Special Purpose Immunization Date
which does not extend beyond the
modified duration (as defined in the
RPT Special Purpose Wrap Agreement)
of the underlying assets on the RPT
Special Purpose Immunization Date; or
(2) the first date on which the market
value of the underlying assets equals or
exceeds the book value under the wrap
agreement;
(k) No Below Investment Grade
Securities will be added to the RPT
Special Purpose Wrap Agreement after
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
April 23, 2011, unless otherwise agreed
by BANA, the Trustee, and the
Independent Fiduciary. No party to the
RPT Special Purpose Wrap Agreement
is obligated to amend or extend the RPT
Special Purpose Wrap Agreement;
(l) The tasks performed by the
Independent Fiduciary will include:
(1) Determining whether the RPT
Special Purpose Wrap Agreement and
the portfolio arrangement for the Type
D1 Account (including the wrap fee
payable to BANA, the Minimum Ratio,
the prefunding of the RPT Special
Purpose Wrap Agreement and the
formula for resetting the Type D1
Account Crediting Rate) are prudent and
in the best interest of participants and
beneficiaries of Plans investing in RPT;
(2) Reviewing valuations generated by
BlackRock (in connection with the RPT
Special Purpose Wrap Agreement) in
any situation where BlackRock is unable
to obtain a reliable valuation from
independent third party sources. If, after
such review, the Independent Fiduciary
deems appropriate, the Independent
Fiduciary will obtain an independent
valuation which will be binding on the
parties;
(3) Reviewing and monitoring
whether the Type D1 Account Crediting
Rate is calculated correctly;
(4) Monitoring the addition and
removal of Below Investment Grade
Securities and any changes in Permitted
Securities in the Type D1 Account, and
opining, in a written report, whether
such addition, removal or change is
appropriate;
(5) If BANA objects to the calculation
by the Trustee or its designee of the
Type D1 Account Crediting Rate or the
information used to calculate the Type
D1 Account Crediting Rate, the
Independent Fiduciary will make a
conclusive and binding determination
regarding such calculation or
information;
(6) Determining whether to approve
any proposed change to the Type D1
Account Crediting Rate formula,
including any proposed adjustment to
the duration component of the Type D1
Account Crediting Rate formula;
(7) No later than April 30, 2011,
working with BANA, BlackRock, and
the Trustee to review and determine
whether additional Below Investment
Grade Securities may be transferred to
the Type D1 Account and be covered by
the RPT Special Purpose Wrap
Agreement;
(8) Making an initial and, thereafter,
annual determination regarding whether
the fee described in paragraph (h) of this
section is reasonable relative to the
specific attributes of the RPT Special
Purpose Wrap Agreement;
E:\FR\FM\06OCN2.SGM
06OCN2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 6, 2010 / Notices
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES2
(9) Making an annual determination
regarding whether the continued
maintenance of the RPT Special Purpose
Wrap Agreement is appropriate and in
the interest of Plans;
(10) Making a monthly determination
regarding whether the appropriate Type
D1 Crediting Rate formula is being used;
and
(11) Reviewing and approving any
amendment to a RPT Special Purpose
Wrap Agreement consistent with
paragraph (n) of this section;
(m) Any Special Purpose WrapRelated Transaction that involves: (1)
The exercise by BANA, the Trustee, or
BlackRock Advisors of their rights
under the RPT Special Purpose Wrap
Agreement; or (2) the performance by
BANA, the Trustee, or BlackRock of
their obligations under the RPT Special
Purpose Wrap Agreement, shall be
subject to prior review and approval by
the Independent Fiduciary if such
exercise or performance affects the Type
D1 Crediting Rate or otherwise would
have an adverse impact on the book
value of a participant’s or beneficiary’s
investment in RPT; and
(n) The Independent Fiduciary must
receive a copy of any RPT Special
Purpose Wrap Agreement amendment
prior to the effective date of such
amendment. The Independent Fiduciary
must review and approve the
amendment prior to its implementation,
except that no such review and approval
shall be required for an amendment that
is purely ministerial in nature.
Section IV. Conditions Applicable to
Transactions Described in Section I(c)
(a) Effective June 1, 2009, BlackRock
Advisors may change the formula for
calculating the Crediting Rate with
respect to each Separately Managed
Account Wrap Agreement only after
obtaining prior approval from BANA
and the Independent Fiduciary.
BlackRock Advisors shall provide the
Independent Fiduciary with any
information it may reasonably request in
determining whether to approve a
proposed change in the Crediting Rate
formula;
(b) Effective June 1, 2009, the
Crediting Rate will be reset no more
frequently than on a monthly basis;
(c) BANA will not receive a fee under
the BANA Wal-Mart Separately
Managed Wrap Agreement in excess of
the maximum percentage fee received
by any other Tier 3 Wrap Provider in the
Wal-Mart Separately Managed Account;
and BANA will not receive a fee under
the BANA Hertz Separately Managed
Wrap Agreement in excess of the
maximum percentage fee received by
any other financial institution that has
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:35 Oct 05, 2010
Jkt 223001
entered into a wrap agreement covering
assets in the Hertz Separately Managed
Account;
(d) Assets covered under each
Separately Managed Account Wrap
Agreement will be valued in accordance
with the same methodology specified in
section II(f) above; provided, however,
that if BANA objects to the valuation of
any asset, the Independent Fiduciary
will make a binding determination of
the value of the asset;
(e) The tasks performed by the
Independent Fiduciary will include:
(1) Conducting a monthly review of
the Crediting Rate, including,
confirming: (A) The book value of the
portfolio of assets wrapped by each
Separately Managed Account Wrap
Agreement; (B) the valuation of
securities; (C) the duration of securities;
(D) the market yield of securities; and
(E) that the Crediting Rate formula was
calculated properly;
(2) Reviewing and approving any
proposed amendment to a Separately
Managed Wrap Agreement consistent
with paragraph (i) below;
(3) Reviewing any exercise of contract
provisions by any of BANA, BlackRock
Advisors or, in the case of the BANA
Wal-Mart Separately Managed Wrap
Agreement, the Trustee, and analyze its
potential impact on investors;
(4) Evaluating any changes to the fees
paid to BANA under each Separately
Managed Account Wrap Agreement to
determine reasonableness relative to
market conditions and risks; and
(5) Providing quarterly reports to
BlackRock Advisors and to the named
fiduciaries of the Wal-Mart Plan and the
Hertz Plan. These reports must certify
that the Independent Fiduciary has
reviewed the factors described above
and state whether BlackRock Advisors
has complied with all requirements of
the contract. The Independent Fiduciary
will inform the named fiduciaries of a
Plan if it believes that BANA or
BlackRock Advisors has taken any
actions that are not in the best interests
of the participants and beneficiaries in
the Wal-Mart Plan or the Hertz Plan, as
relevant;
(f) The Separately Managed Account
Wrap Agreements shall authorize the
Independent Fiduciary to:
(1) Review and approve any proposed
changes in the formula for calculating
the Crediting Rate, prior to
implementation of any such change;
(2) If BlackRock Advisors generates its
own valuation, review the valuation,
and if the Independent Fiduciary deems
appropriate, obtain an independent
valuation, which shall be binding on the
parties, subject to BANA’s right to raise
an objection to any valuation;
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
61935
(3) If BANA objects to the valuation
of any asset, make a binding
determination of the value of the asset;
(g) The named fiduciaries (or their
authorized representatives) for the WalMart Plan have the right to terminate
BlackRock Advisors, as investment
manager for the Wal-Mart Separately
Managed Account, on 90 days’ written
notice. The named fiduciaries (or their
authorized representatives) for the Hertz
Plan have the right to terminate
B1ackRock Advisors as investment
manager for the Hertz Separately
Managed Account, on 30 days’ written
notice;
(h) Any Separately Managed Account
Wrap-Related Transaction that involves:
(1) The exercise by BANA, the Trustee,
or BlackRock Advisors of their rights
under a Separately Managed Account
Wrap Agreement; or (2) the performance
by BANA, the Trustee, or BlackRock of
their obligations under a Separately
Managed Wrap Agreement: shall be
subject to prior review and approval by
the Independent Fiduciary if such
exercise or performance affects the
Crediting Rate or otherwise would have
an adverse impact on the book value of
a participant’s or beneficiary’s
investment in RPT;
(i) The Independent Fiduciary must
receive a copy of any amendment
contemplated for a Separately Managed
Wrap Agreement. The Independent
Fiduciary must review and approve the
amendment prior to its implementation,
except that no such review and approval
shall be required for an amendment that
is purely ministerial in nature; and
(j) BlackRock may not terminate a
Separately Managed Account Wrap
Agreement without the prior approval of
the Independent Fiduciary.
Section V. General Conditions
(a) BlackRock Advisors shall maintain
in the United States the records
necessary to enable the persons
described in (b) below to determine
whether the conditions of this
exemption, if granted, were met, except
that:
(1) If the records necessary to enable
the persons described in (b) below to
determine whether the conditions of the
exemption have been met are lost or
destroyed, due to circumstances beyond
the control of BlackRock Advisors, then
no prohibited transaction will be
considered to have occurred solely on
the basis of the unavailability of those
records; and
(2) No party in interest other than
BlackRock Advisors shall be subject to
the civil penalty that may be assessed
under section 502(i) of the Act or to the
taxes imposed by sections 4975(a) and
E:\FR\FM\06OCN2.SGM
06OCN2
61936
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 6, 2010 / Notices
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES2
(b) of the Code if the records have not
been maintained or are not available for
examination as required by paragraph
(b) below;
(b) Except as provided in paragraph
(c) of this section V and
notwithstanding the provisions of
subsections (a)(2) and (b) of section 504
of the Act, the records referred to in
section V(a) are unconditionally
available for examination during normal
business hours at their customary
location to the following persons or an
authorized representative thereof:
(1) Any duly authorized employee or
representative of the Department or the
Internal Revenue Service;
(2) Any fiduciary of a Plan
participating in RPT or the Hertz Plan
or the Wal-Mart Plan;
(3) Any participant or beneficiary of a
Plan participating in RPT or the Hertz
Plan or the Wal-Mart Plan; or
(4) The Independent Fiduciary.
(c) None of the persons described
above in paragraphs (2), (3), and (4) of
paragraph (b) of this section V shall be
authorized to examine trade secrets of
BlackRock, BANA, the Trustee or any of
their Affiliates, or any commercial or
financial information which is
privileged or confidential. Should
BlackRock Advisors refuse to disclose
information on the basis that such
information is exempt from disclosure,
BlackRock Advisors shall, by the close
of the thirtieth (30th) day following the
request, provide written notice advising
that person of the reason for the refusal
and that the Department may request
such information; and
(d) Promptly following any
publication of a final exemption in the
Federal Register, the Trustee or
BlackRock Advisors will provide a copy
of the final exemption to the Plan
sponsor of each Plan invested in RPT,
and to the Plan sponsor of the Hertz
Plan, and to the Plan sponsor of the
Wal-Mart Plan.
Section VI. Definitions
(a) The term Act means: The
Employee Retirement Income Security
Act of 1974, as amended;
(b) The term Affiliate means: Any
person, directly or indirectly, through
one or more intermediaries, controlling,
controlled by or under common control
with such person;
(c) The term BANA means: Bank of
America, N.A. and its Affiliates;
(d) The term BANA Hertz Separately
Managed Wrap Agreement means: The
agreement dated as of July 27, 2007 (and
amended effective as of December 31,
2008) among BANA, BlackRock
Advisors (as investment manager for a
portion of the assets of the Hertz Plan),
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:35 Oct 05, 2010
Jkt 223001
and the Bank of New York Mellon (the
successor by operation of law to Mellon
Bank N.A., and the trustee of the trust
created pursuant to the Hertz Plan), as
such agreement may be amended from
time to time, pursuant to which BANA
provides a book value benefit
responsive facility with respect to a
portion of the assets held in the Hertz
Separately Managed Account;
(e) The term BANA RPT Buy and
Hold Wrap Agreement means: The
agreement dated as of October 16, 1996,
between Barclays Bank PLC and the
Trustee (as assigned to BANA as of
April 1, 1998, and amended effective as
of December 31, 2008), as such
agreement may be amended from time
to time, pursuant to which BANA
provides a book value benefit
responsive facility with respect to an
undivided portion of the assets held in
the Global Buy and Hold Account;
(f) The term BANA RPT Global Wrap
Agreement means: The agreement dated
as of May 1, 2004 (and amended
effective as of December 31, 2008)
between BANA and the Trustee, as such
agreement may be amended from time
to time, pursuant to which BANA
provides a book value benefit
responsive facility with respect to an
undivided portion of the assets held in
the Global Wrap Account;
(g) The term BANA Wal-Mart
Separately Managed Wrap Agreement
means: The agreement dated as of
August 19, 2003 (and amended effective
as of December 31, 2008) between
BANA and the Trustee, as such
agreement may be amended from time
to time, pursuant to which BANA
provides a book value benefit
responsive facility with respect to a
portion of the assets held in the WalMart Separately Managed Account;
(h) The term Below Investment Grade
Security means: Securities that cease to
be covered by a benefit responsive
contract in RPT (other than by the RPT
Special Purpose Wrap Agreement)
solely as a result of a downgrade in the
credit rating of the security to below
Baa3, BBB- or BBB- by Moody’s
Investors Services, Inc., Standard &
Poor’s Rating Group, or Fitch Ratings,
respectively; provided, however, that a
Below Investment Grade Security shall
not include any security that is an
Impaired Security;
(i) The term BlackRock means:
BlackRock, Inc.;
(j) The term BlackRock Advisors
means: BlackRock Investment
Management, LLC and its Affiliates;
(k) The term Code means: The
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended;
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
(l) The term Crediting Rate means:
The crediting rate described in sections
II and IV that is used for purposes of
determining the accrued interest to be
added to the book value of an
individual’s account within RPT or the
Separately Managed Accounts;
(m) The term Downgraded Security
means: A Below Grade Investment
Security that is held in the Type D1
Account and covered by the RPT
Special Purpose Wrap Agreement;
(n) The term Global Buy and Hold
Account means: The book account or
sub-account maintained within RPT for
purposes of identifying certain assets
relating to the BANA RPT Buy and Hold
Wrap Agreement;
(o) The term Global Wrap Account
means: The book account or subaccount maintained within RPT for
purposes of identifying certain assets
relating to the BANA RPT Global Wrap
Agreement;
(p) The term Hertz Plan means: The
Hertz Corporation Income Savings Plan;
(q) The term Hertz Separately
Managed Account means: The
separately managed stable value account
advised by BlackRock Advisors on
behalf of the Hertz Plan;
(r) The term Impaired Security means:
(i) A security with respect to which the
issuer or guarantor has failed to make
one or more payments of principal or
interest (after giving effect to any
applicable grace period under the terms
of such security or prescribed by any
change in law, regulation, ruling or
other governmental action); (ii) a
security with respect to which the
principal or interest has become due
and payable before it otherwise would
have been due or payable other than: (x)
By reason of a call or other prepayment
of such security made in accordance
with its terms that does not constitute
a default under such security, or (y)
solely on account of any change in law,
regulation, ruling or other governmental
action; (iii) a security where the rate of
interest thereon has been reset other
than: (x) Pursuant to the original terms
of such security, or (y) solely on account
of any change in law, regulation, ruling
or other governmental action; or (iv) a
security with respect to which the issuer
becomes insolvent or institutes or has
instituted against it a proceeding
seeking a judgment of insolvency or
bankruptcy or any other relief under any
bankruptcy or insolvency law or other
similar law affecting creditor’s rights;
(s) The term Independent Fiduciary
means an entity that is: (1) Experienced
and knowledgeable in ERISA and the
transactions and arrangements
described herein; (ii) independent of
and unrelated to BANA, Merrill,
E:\FR\FM\06OCN2.SGM
06OCN2
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 6, 2010 / Notices
BlackRock, and their Affiliates; and (iii)
appointed to act on behalf of Plans
investing in RPT or the Separately
Managed Accounts with respect to the
matters described herein. The
Independent Fiduciary will not be
deemed to be independent of and
unrelated to BANA, Merrill, BlackRock,
and their Affiliates if: (i) Such fiduciary
directly or indirectly controls, is
controlled by or is under common
control with BANA, Merrill, or
BlackRock; (ii) such fiduciary directly or
indirectly receives any compensation or
other consideration in connection with
any transaction described in this
exemption, if granted, other than for
acting as an Independent Fiduciary in
connection with the transactions
described herein, provided that the
amount or payment of such
compensation is not contingent upon, or
in any way affected by, the Independent
Fiduciary’s ultimate decision; and (iii)
the annual gross revenue received by
the Independent Fiduciary, during any
year of its engagement, from BANA,
Merrill, BlackRock, and any of their
Affiliates, exceeds five percent (5%) of
the Independent Fiduciary’s annual
gross revenue from all sources (for
federal income tax purposes) for its
prior tax year;
(t) The term Minimum Ratio means: A
ratio of 2.5 to 1.0 of market value of
Permitted Securities to the total
unamortized unrealized and realized
losses with respect to Downgraded
Securities;
(u) The term Permitted Securities
means any security that: (i) Is a U.S.
Treasury debenture, a security issued by
the Government National Mortgage
Association or a security guaranteed by
the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation; and (ii) has a modified
duration on the date of purchase by RPT
of 3.5 years or less;
(v) The term Plan means: An
employee benefit plan within the
meaning of and subject to Title I of the
Act or an individual retirement account
within the meaning of section 4975 of
the Code;
(w) The term RPT means: The Merrill
Lynch Retirement Preservation Trust
maintained by the Trustee;
(x) The term RPT Special Purpose
Wrap Agreement means: The agreement
dated as of April 23, 2009, as amended,
between BANA and the Trustee,
pursuant to which BANA provides a
book value benefit responsive facility
with respect to an undivided portion of
the assets held in the Type D1 Account;
(y) The term RPT Stable Value
Agreements means: The BANA RPT
Global Wrap Agreement and the BANA
RPT Buy and Hold Wrap Agreement;
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:35 Oct 05, 2010
Jkt 223001
(z) The term Separately Managed
Accounts means: The Hertz Separately
Managed Account and the Wal-Mart
Separately Managed Account;
(aa) The term Separately Managed
Account Wrap Agreements means: The
BANA Wal-Mart Separately Managed
Wrap Agreement and the BANA Hertz
Separately Managed Wrap Agreement;
(bb) The term Type D1 Account
means: The book account maintained
within RPT for purposes of identifying
Downgraded Securities, including
unamortized losses with respect to
Downgraded Securities that have been
sold, and Permitted Securities covered
by the RPT Special Purpose Wrap
Agreement;
(cc) The term Tier 3 Wrap Provider
means: A financial institution that has
entered into a wrap agreement with
respect to assets held in the Wal-Mart
Separately Managed Account that will
not be accessed for purposes of making
benefit payments until after two tiers of
buffer assets are accessed;
(dd) The term Trustee means: Bank of
America, N.A.;
(ee) The term Wal-Mart Plan means:
The Wal-Mart Profit Sharing and 401(k)
Plan and the Wal-Mart Puerto Rico
Profit Sharing and 401(k) Plan;
(ff) The term Wal-Mart Separately
Managed Account means: The
separately managed stable value account
advised by BlackRock Advisors on
behalf of the Wal-Mart Plan;
(gg) The term Merrill means: Merrill
Lynch & Co., Inc. and its Affiliates;
(hh) The term RPT Wrap-Related
Transaction means: (1) The
determination, calculation of and
adjustments to the Crediting Rate, and
any changes to the Crediting Rate
formula; (2) valuations of securities
covered by the BANA RPT Stable Value
Agreements; (3) payment of wrap fees
and any changes to wrap fees; (4) the
purchase and sale of any security
covered by the RPT Stable Value
Agreements; (5) BANA’s or the Trustee’s
exercise of its right to immunize or
terminate the RPT Stable Value
Agreements; (6) amendments to the RPT
Stable Value Agreements; and (7) any
other exercise by BANA, the Trustee, or
BlackRock Advisors of their rights, or
any performance by BANA, the Trustee,
or BlackRock of their obligations, under
the Stable Value Agreements;
(ii) The term Special Purpose WrapRelated Transaction means: (1) The
transfer of Below Investment Grade
Securities to the Type D1 Account; (2)
the sale or transfer of Downgraded
Securities out of the Type D1 Account;
(3) the purchase and sale of certain
other securities permitted to be held in
the Type D1 Account; (4) transactions
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
61937
relating to maintenance of a minimum
ratio of Permitted Securities and
Downgraded Securities; (5) the
determination, calculation of and
adjustments to the Type D1 Account
Crediting Rate and any changes to the
Type D1 Account Crediting Rate
formula; (6) valuations of securities
covered by the RPT Special Purpose
Wrap Agreement; (7) payment of and
any changes to wrap fees; (8) BANA’s or
the Trustee’s exercise of its right to
immunize or terminate the RPT Special
Purpose Wrap Agreement; (9) the
entering into and amendment of the
RPT Special Purpose Wrap Agreement;
and (10) any exercise by BANA, the
Trustee, or BlackRock Advisors of their
rights, or any performance by BANA,
the Trustee, or BlackRock of their
obligations, under the RPT Special
Purpose Wrap Agreement;
(jj) The term Separately Managed
Account Wrap-Related Transaction
means: (1) The determination,
calculation of and adjustments to the
Crediting Rate, and any changes to the
Crediting Rate formula; (2) valuations of
securities covered by the Separately
Managed Account Wrap Agreements; (3)
payment of wrap fees and any changes
to wrap fees; (4) the purchase and sale
of any security covered by the
Separately Managed Account Wrap
Agreements; (5) BANA’s or the Trustee’s
exercise of its right to terminate the
Separately Managed Wrap Agreements;
(6) amendments to the Separately
Managed Wrap Agreements; and (7) any
other exercise by BANA, the Trustee, or
BlackRock Advisors of their rights, or
any performance by BANA, the Trustee,
or BlackRock of their obligations, under
the Separately Managed Wrap
Agreements.
Summary of Facts and Representations
1. Applicants
A. Bank of America, NA (BANA).
BANA is a wholly-owned indirect
subsidiary of Bank of America
Corporation (BAC). BANA is engaged in
a general consumer banking,
commercial banking and trust business,
offering a wide range of commercial,
corporate, international, financial
market, retail and fiduciary banking
services.
B. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. (Merrill).
Merrill is a holding company that,
through its affiliates, provides brokerdealer, investment banking, financing,
advisory, wealth management,
insurance, lending and related products
and services. Merrill’s subsidiaries
included Merrill Lynch Bank & Trust
Co., FSB (MLTC). MLTC merged into
BANA during the fourth quarter of 2009.
E:\FR\FM\06OCN2.SGM
06OCN2
61938
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 6, 2010 / Notices
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES2
C. BlackRock, Inc. (BlackRock).
BlackRock is an investment
management firm that, as of December
31, 2008, had approximately $1.307
trillion in assets under management.
D. Merrill/BAC Merger. On September
15, 2008, BAC and Merrill entered into
an agreement and plan of merger
pursuant to which, effective as of the
closing of the transactions contemplated
thereby, a new, wholly-owned
subsidiary of BAC merged with and into
Merrill (the Merrill/BAC Merger). The
Merrill/BAC Merger closed on January
1, 2009, at which time Merrill became
a wholly-owned subsidiary of BAC and
an affiliate of BANA.
E. Merrill/BlackRock Transaction. On
September 29, 2006, Merrill contributed
Merrill Lynch Investment Managers,
LLC and various other assets and
subsidiaries that comprised its
investment management business to
BlackRock. As a result of that
transaction (the Merrill/BlackRock
Transaction), from September 29, 2006,
though December 26, 2008, Merrill held
an approximate 49% ownership interest
in BlackRock and held 45% of the
outstanding voting securities of
BlackRock. Pursuant to an exchange
agreement between Merrill and
BlackRock, dated as of December 26,
2008, Merrill reduced its voting interest
in BlackRock to 4.9%. However, Merrill
retained an approximate 49.5% equity
interest in BlackRock.
F. BlackRock/Barclays Acquisition.
On December 1, 2009, BlackRock
acquired Barclays Global Investors. As
part of this transaction, Merrill Lynch’s
economic ownership of BlackRock was
reduced to 34.2%. Merrill Lynch
currently has a 3.4% voting interest in
BlackRock.
2. The Application
The application submitted by the
Applicants includes the following: An
overview of stable value funds; a
description of the Retirement
Preservation Trust (RPT) stable value
fund; a request for retroactive and
prospective exemptive relief for the
operation of, and certain transactions
under, two stable value wrap
agreements entered into between MLTC
and BANA with respect to certain assets
of the RPT; a request for retroactive and
prospective exemptive relief for the
execution and operation of, and certain
transactions under, a ‘‘special purpose’’
wrap agreement entered into between
MLTC and BANA with respect to
certain assets of RPT; a request for
retroactive and prospective exemptive
relief for the operation of and
transactions under two stable value
wrap agreements entered into by BANA
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:35 Oct 05, 2010
Jkt 223001
with respect to single plan separately
managed accounts advised by
BlackRock Advisers, a BlackRock
affiliate, on behalf of the Hertz Plan and
the Wal-Mart Plan; and numerous
representations by Fiduciary Counselors
Inc., who is currently the independent
fiduciary (the Independent Fiduciary)
responsible for representing the
interests of the Hertz Plan, the Wal-Mart
Plan, and employee benefit plans
(Plans) investing in RPT for purposes of
the transactions described in this
proposed exemption, if granted.
Paragraphs 3–9. Applicants’ Overview
of Stable Value Funds
3. Stable value funds are intended as
conservative investment options that
provide preservation of principal,
liquidity and current income at levels
that are typically higher than those
provided by money market funds. To
achieve this objective, stable value
funds invest in traditional and synthetic
guaranteed investment contracts (GICs).
A traditional GIC is an investment
contract that guarantees payments on
deposits at a specified rate and is
typically purchased through an
insurance company. In a synthetic GIC
structure, the plan or plan asset fund
retains title to an underlying portfolio of
fixed income assets and purchases a
‘‘wrap agreement’’ from a bank,
insurance company or other financial
institution. Synthetic GICs permit
diversification away from the credit risk
of an insurance company and provide
an opportunity to achieve higher returns
through an actively managed portfolio.
4. Under the terms of standard wrap
agreements, the wrap provider agrees
that payments to participants upon
retirement, death, disability,
employment termination, hardship or
transfer to a non-competing investment
alternative (generally referred to as
‘‘benefit responsive payments’’) will be
made based on ‘‘book value,’’ regardless
of fluctuations in the market value of
the underlying portfolio of assets. Book
value generally represents the value of
deposits (i.e., the principal amount
invested) plus interest (accumulated at
a ‘‘credited rate’’) minus withdrawals
and minus adjustments for assets that
become impaired.2 This provision of
book value accounting at the participant
level is the core feature of a stable value
fund. However, not all payments to
participants are made at book value. For
example, withdrawals arising from a
plan’s decision to transfer to a
2 The Applicants describe an impaired security as
including a security with respect to which the
issuer or guarantor has failed to make one or more
payments of principal or interest.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
competing investment alternative, or
certain actions initiated by a plan
sponsor, may be paid at market value,
which could be less than book value
depending on the performance of the
underlying investment portfolio.
5. A wrap agreement does not
guarantee that the book value of the
wrapped assets will increase by a
specified rate of return. Rather, interest
is credited to the underlying portfolio
based on a formula that is designed to
equal the actual total rate of return on
the underlying portfolio over time,
while smoothing the gains and losses.
To achieve this smoothing, the
difference between the market value of
the underlying portfolio and the book
value of the underlying portfolio is
amortized through periodic adjustments
to the rate at which interest is credited
to the book value of the underlying
portfolio. The rate at which interest is
credited is determined by means of a
formula (the crediting rate formula)
which takes into account the yield to
maturity and the duration of the
underlying portfolio as well as the ratio
of the market value of the underlying
portfolio to the book value.
6. Stable value funds generally
include: (1) a liquidity fund that may or
may not be covered by a wrap
agreement; and (2) multiple portfolios of
assets, each covered by a different wrap
agreement. The wrap agreements
include rules establishing the priority
for obtaining cash for withdrawals from
the assets included in the stable value
fund. Generally, these rules require that
withdrawals be first met from new cash
and then from the liquidity fund. Once
these sources are exhausted,
withdrawals are funded by selling
securities in wrapped portfolios. Thus,
for example, in the event there are
significant participant withdrawals
during a bond-market downturn (an
environment in which there could be a
significant difference between the wrap
contract book value and the market
value of the wrapped assets) the stable
value fund would first access liquid
assets in the fund in an attempt to make
book value payments. Once those are
exhausted, wrapped assets would be
sold in a pre-specified order to provide
liquidity needed to make book value
payments. If all of the assets covered by
a particular wrap contract were sold,
and if the proceeds were insufficient to
meet the book value payment, the wrap
provider would pay the difference
between the sale proceeds and the book
value under the wrap contract before
securities in the next lower tier would
be sold to fund withdrawals.
7. Wrap agreements can generally be
terminated by either party (i.e., the
E:\FR\FM\06OCN2.SGM
06OCN2
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 6, 2010 / Notices
trustee of the stable value fund or the
wrap provider) at market value.
However, most wrap agreements have
immunization provisions whereby if the
wrap agreement is terminated: (1) More
conservative investment guidelines (i.e.,
more conservative than the guidelines
in effect before the immunization) will
apply to the underlying portfolio; and
(2) the wrap provider will continue to
provide book value coverage until a date
that is generally determined by
reference to the underlying portfolio. If
wrap contracts were terminable by the
wrap provider on short notice at a time
when the market value of the wrapped
assets was below the wrapped contract
book value, and another wrap provider
could not be found as a substitute, the
unwrapped assets would be
immediately revalued down to their fair
market value. Immunization is a
‘‘middle ground,’’ and provides a means
of winding down and terminating a
contract that otherwise would be
‘‘evergreen.’’ Immunization effectively
permits an open-ended contract to be
converted to a contract with a deferred
termination date. During the
immunization period, the wrapped
contract continues to be ‘‘benefit
responsive’’ and investors continue to
receive payments at book value.
8. Fees for wrap agreements are
generally based on a percentage of the
book value of assets covered by a wrap
agreement. The fee is frequently paid
from the assets of the Plan or Plan asset
fund. The amount of the fee will vary
depending upon the risk taken and the
market conditions when the wrap
agreement is negotiated. Since book
value payments generally could occur
when investments are moved to another
non-competing investment option,
when retirees or other inactive
participants withdraw money from a
plan and when participants take inservice withdrawals, book value
payments are neither predictable nor
controllable by the wrap provider.
Notwithstanding that wrap contracts are
structured in a manner that is intended
to mitigate the risk of higher than
expected or untimely participant
withdrawals, the risk remains greater
than zero. Fees for wrap agreements
would be significantly higher if the
wrap provider guaranteed the actual
performance of the assets wrapped in
circumstances beyond those described
above.
9. In the current distressed economic
climate, the number of financial
institutions that are willing to enter into
wrap agreements has declined. To the
extent wrap coverage can be obtained,
the fees for providing such coverage
have significantly increased from the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:35 Oct 05, 2010
Jkt 223001
fees generally available during the past
ten years.
Paragraphs 10–22. Applicants’
Description of RPT
10. RPT is a ‘‘stable value’’ fund with
approximately $11.7 billion book value
of assets as of December 31, 2008.
Payments to participants (or
beneficiaries) upon retirement, death,
disability, employment termination,
hardship or transfer to a non-competing
investment alternative are generally
based on book value, such that a
participant in RPT will receive his
invested principal and interest at a
crediting rate, as described in further
detail below, even if the actual market
value of the underlying assets is less.
11. Bank of America, N.A.
(hereinafter, either BANA or the
Trustee) is the trustee of RPT.
BlackRock Advisers, a wholly-owned
subsidiary of BlackRock, is an
investment adviser to RPT. The assets of
RPT are divided into several portfolios,
which include an actively managed
portfolio with approximately $2.8
billion book value of assets (the Actively
Managed Account) and a buy and hold
portfolio with approximately $1.6
billion book value of assets (the Global
Buy and Hold Account).
12. In connection with the operation
of RPT, the Trustee has entered into
stable value wrap agreements with
banks and other financial institutions to
provide benefit responsive facilities
with respect to certain assets of RPT.
BANA is one of several financial
institutions that have entered into stable
value wrap agreements with the Trustee
under RPT. In this regard, prior to the
Merrill/BAC Merger, BANA had entered
into two separate wrap agreements with
the Trustee under RPT. One agreement,
dated May 1, 2004, provides a benefit
responsive facility with respect to the
Actively Managed Account (the BANA
RPT Global Wrap Agreement). The other
agreement, dated October 16, 1996
(assigned by Barclays Bank PLC to
BANA effective April 1, 1998, and
amended effective as of December 31,
2008), provides a benefit responsive
facility with respect to the Global Buy
and Hold Account (the BANA RPT Buy
and Hold Wrap Agreement).
13. The BANA RPT Global Wrap
Agreement is one of four wrap
agreements covering assets in a global
wrap account (the Global Wrap
Account). The Global Wrap Account
represents approximately 24% of the
total book value of the assets of RPT.
The assets in the Global Wrap Account
are actively managed. Under this wrap
agreement, which RPT and BANA
entered into prior to the Merrill/BAC
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
61939
Merger, BANA provide benefit
responsive coverage for approximately
27% of the book value of the assets
credited to the Global Wrap Account.
Banks and financial institutions
unaffiliated with BANA have entered
into wrap agreements with the Trustee
providing coverage for approximately
73% of the book value of the assets in
the Global Wrap Account. The assets in
the Global Wrap Account covered by the
BANA RPT Global Wrap Agreement are
not segregated from the assets in the
Global Wrap Account covered by the
other wrap agreements. Each wrap
agreement covers a specified percentage
of the book value of the assets in the
Global Wrap Account as a whole. In this
regard, the BANA RPT Global Wrap
Agreement provides a benefit
responsive wrap with respect to
approximately 5.5% of the total book
value of the assets of RPT.
14. Under the BANA RPT Buy and
Hold Wrap Agreement, prior to
December 31, 2008, BANA provided a
benefit responsive facility with respect
to a segregated ‘‘buy and hold’’ portfolio
of assets of RPT, with no other wrap
provider providing a benefit responsive
facility with respect to this portfolio.
Effective as of December 31, 2008, the
Applicants amended the BANA RPT
Buy and Hold Wrap Agreement in a
manner that: (a) Combined the ‘‘buy and
hold’’ portfolio covered by the BANA
RPT Buy and Hold Wrap Agreement
with a portfolio of assets of RPT covered
by a ‘‘buy and hold’’ benefit responsive
wrap agreement between the Trustee
and another unaffiliated wrap provider
(Global Buy and Hold Wrap Provider 2)
to form the Global Buy and Hold
Account; and (b) provides that BANA
will provide coverage for 50% of the
book value of the assets held in the
Global Buy and Hold Account. Global
Buy and Hold Wrap Provider 2’s wrap
agreement with the Trustee was
amended similarly to provide that it
will provide coverage for 50% of the
book value of the assets held in the
Global Buy and Hold Account. As is the
case with the BANA RPT Global Wrap
Agreement, the assets in the Global Buy
and Hold Account covered by the
BANA RPT Buy and Hold Wrap
Agreement are not segregated from the
assets in the Global Buy and Hold
Account covered by the other wrap
agreement. Each wrap agreement covers
a specified percentage of the book value
of the assets in the Global Buy and Hold
Account as a whole. The Global Buy
and Hold Account as a whole represents
approximately 13.6% of the book value
of the assets of RPT, and the BANA RPT
Buy and Hold Wrap Agreement
E:\FR\FM\06OCN2.SGM
06OCN2
61940
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 6, 2010 / Notices
provides a benefit responsive wrap with
respect to approximately 6.8% of the
total book value of the assets of RPT.3
15. The BANA RPT Global Wrap
Agreement and the BANA RPT Buy and
Hold Wrap Agreement (the RPT Stable
Value Agreements) provide for ‘‘buffer’’
assets that would be liquidated to fund
withdrawals from RPT before the assets
held under the Global Wrap Account or
the Global Buy and Hold Account are
used to fund withdrawals. Under the
RPT Stable Value Agreements, liquidity
requirements for withdrawals would be
satisfied in the following order:
(1) Netting withdrawals from deposits
whenever possible;
(2) Simple interest payments and maturing
proceeds;
(3) Type ‘‘A’’ assets which include money
market and other short-term investments as
well as any short-term benefit responsive
floaters;
(4) Type ‘‘B’’ buffer contracts, which will
generally be accessed on a pro rata basis;
(5) Level ‘‘C’’ contracts on a pro rata basis;
and
(6) Level ‘‘D’’ contracts.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES2
The RPT Stable Value Agreements cover
Level C assets which, subject to a
limited temporary exception for certain
Plan level withdrawals from RPT, will
not be accessed until assets in a higher
category have all been accessed.4 A
minimum of 8% of RPT’s assets must be
held as Type A and Type B combined.
As of June 10, 2009, Type A and Type
B assets accounted for approximately
13% of the assets of RPT. These ‘‘buffer’’
assets significantly reduce the
likelihood that payments will be
triggered for any of the wrap providers
that wrap assets in the Global Wrap
3 The Applicants represent that the conversion of
the BANA RPT Buy and Hold Wrap Agreement into
a ‘‘global’’ arrangement will not affect the Crediting
Rate (referenced above and described in further
detail below) applicable to a participant’s account
in RPT. In this regard, the Applicants state that the
conversion involved a purely internal adjustment,
based upon an objective mathematical formula,
among BANA and the other wrap provider to reflect
the different market to book ratios of assets
wrapped by BANA and Global Buy and Hold Wrap
Provider 2 at the time of conversion into the Global
Buy and Hold Account. The Applicants represent
that this adjustment is relevant only if the wrap
contracts must be accessed to make benefit
responsive payments and will have no effect on the
participants.
4 The Applicants represent that, to address
liquidity concerns under RPT, the wrap providers
covering assets in RPT have agreed to permit the
Trustee and BlackRock Advisers to sell a vertical
slice of securities held in RPT, other than securities
covered by the Special Purpose Wrap Agreement
(discussed below), to fund certain Plan-level
withdrawals. In this regard, BAC will provide direct
capital contributions to fund the difference between
the market value and the book value of the assets
attributable to the withdrawing Plans in an amount
of up to $175 million. BAC’s commitment to
provide liquidity will be in effect for a maximum
period of two years.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:35 Oct 05, 2010
Jkt 223001
Account or the Global Buy and Hold
Account.
16. The BANA RPT Stable Value
Agreements effectively function to
protect Plans that invest in RPT if there
are significant withdrawals during
negative market conditions. RPT has
been structured with the expectation
that RPT liquidity requirements can be
satisfied without resort to the assets
covered by the wrap contracts. Since
RPT was established in 1989, the
Trustee has never been required to
access the wrap contracts. Eligible
investments made by RPT are generally
conservative and the buffer assets
reduce the likelihood that a payment
would need to be made under a wrap
contract.5 Each of the RPT Stable Value
Agreements also has strict investment
guidelines regarding the investments
that can be held under those contracts.
Only in the event that there are
substantial withdrawals from RPT at a
time when the assets of RPT are
significantly underperforming would
there be any risk that the assets covered
by the wrap contracts would need to be
liquidated to satisfy withdrawals and a
payment from a wrap provider would be
required. Moreover, in the current
distressed economic environment,
participants in employee benefit plans
have generally moved assets into
conservative investments, such as stable
value funds. RPT had a net inflow (i.e.,
contributions in excess of withdrawals)
of approximately $300 million during
the fourth quarter of 2008.
17. The crediting rate under a wrap
agreement is the rate of interest that is
used for purposes of determining the
accrued interest to be added to the book
value of the assets covered by the
agreement. Under either RPT Stable
Value Agreement, such crediting rate
(the Crediting Rate) was set at the
inception of the wrap agreement by
agreement between BANA and the
Trustee and has been, and will continue
to be, reset periodically based on an
objective formula. The Crediting Rate
formula is designed to amortize the
difference between the market value and
the book value of assets covered by the
wrap agreement over the approximate
duration of the covered assets. The
Crediting Rate formula used in the
BANA RPT Global Wrap Agreement and
the BANA RPT Buy and Hold Wrap
Agreement, effective as of March 1,
2009, is:
5 The Department has not considered the issue,
and is expressing no opinion herein, regarding
whether RPT assets have been invested on a
conservative basis or in a manner consistent with
RPT guidelines.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
Crediting Rate = [(PMV/PBV)1/(F*DUR) *
(1 + AYTM)] ¥ 1
Where:
PMV is the market value of the covered
assets;
PBV is the book value of the covered assets;
ATYM is the dollar duration weighted
annualized yield to maturity of the
covered assets;
DUR is the modified duration (Macaulay
duration of the asset or assets * 1/1 +
dollar duration weighted annualized
yield to maturity of the covered assets);
and
F is the factor, if any, agreed upon by the
Trustee or its designee, BANA and the
other wrap providers covering assets in
the Global Wrap Account or the Global
Buy and Hold Account, and approved by
the Independent Fiduciary for purposes
of modifying the duration component of
the Crediting Rate.6
18. In the current economic
environment, it has become standard
stable value industry practice to vary
the duration component of the Crediting
Rate formula to more quickly amortize
the difference between the book value
and the market value of assets covered
by a wrap agreement. BlackRock
Advisors and the Trustee believe that
having flexibility to vary the duration
component of the Crediting Rate
formula applicable to the BANA RPT
Stable Value Agreements is in the best
interests of participants and
beneficiaries because it will greatly
enhance BlackRock Advisors’ ability to
react to low market to book ratios, the
risk that securities will be downgraded,
low Crediting Rates and volatile cash
flows.7
19. The assets in RPT are valued by
BlackRock on a daily basis using a
BlackRock-approved process that
applies to all client securities held by
BlackRock. Valuations are performed
without regard to whether the security
is held in RPT or another account or
commingled vehicle advised by
BlackRock. When valuing securities in
RPT, in all cases, BlackRock looks first
to external third-party pricing sources,
6 According to the Applicants, prior to March
2009, a slightly different Crediting Rate (to the one
above) was set forth in the RPT Stable Value
Agreements and the Separately Managed Account
Wrap Agreements (described below), and a
simplified version of that formula was used to
calculate the Crediting Rate. The Applicants note
further that, in at least one instance, the Crediting
Rate was increased in the middle of a month. The
Applicants do not believe these modifications,
which are described in further detail below,
adversely affected Plan participants and
beneficiaries.
7 The Department notes that the Trustee’s ability
to shorten the duration component of the Crediting
Rate formula may also benefit BANA by reducing
the likelihood that BANA will have to make a
payment to RPT during the immunization period
(as described below).
E:\FR\FM\06OCN2.SGM
06OCN2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 6, 2010 / Notices
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES2
including index providers, brokerdealers and independent pricing
services. BlackRock has a hierarchy for
prioritizing third-party pricing sources,
based on availability and reliability of
the price obtained. The pricing source
may vary by asset class or type, but not
for a particular security. Over time, the
hierarchy used for a particular asset
class may change due to a decrease in
accuracy or consistency or a drop in
coverage for a particular security.
Currently, BlackRock’s third-party
pricing hierarchy generally works in the
following order: (i) Index providers; (ii)
broker-dealers (structured products); 8
and (iii) third-party pricing services
(currently FT Interactive and Reuters
Pricing Services).
20. BlackRock Solutions (BRS), a
financial modeling group, would
generate its own valuation only when it
exhausts the third-party sources for a
valuation. This could occur when there
are no market quotations available for a
security, or if a security were to break
a control, which means that it is
identified by the computer system
because the price provided by a thirdparty source does not fall within certain
statistical norms.9 Historically, BRS has
been able to rely exclusively on thirdparty sources to price securities of the
type held in RPT and, to date, has never
generated its own price for such
securities. However, as a result of the
current market instability, BRS has
enhanced and formalized its process for
valuing securities when third-party
sources are not available. With respect
to assets covered by the RPT Stable
Value Wrap Agreements, any valuation
generated by BRS will be subject to the
limitations described below.
21. BANA and the Trustee each have
the right to terminate the BANA RPT
Global Wrap Agreement through an
‘‘immunization’’ process set forth in the
BANA RPT Global Wrap Agreement.10 If
8 The Applicants state that, as a practical matter,
in many instances broker-dealers will be the first
pricing source for securities, including non-agency
mortgage backed securities, in stable value
products, because no index provider is available.
9 The Applicants state that a security breaking a
control does not necessarily mean that BRS will
independently value the security. When a security
breaks a control, BRS first contacts the external
third-party pricing source that generated the value,
provides that third-party source with additional
information regarding the issue and asks the thirdparty source to review its price. The independent
pricing source will verify or change its price based
on the information provided. BRS will use the third
party’s valuation of a particular security, unless a
determination has been made that the price is
unreliable. If the price is deemed unreliable, it will
be valued in accordance with this paragraph 20,
subject to Independent Fiduciary oversight, as
described below.
10 The Applicants state that, because the BANA
RPT Buy and Hold Wrap Agreement covers a ‘‘buy
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:35 Oct 05, 2010
Jkt 223001
an immunization period occurs, the
wrapped assets will be managed in
accordance with investment guidelines
that are more conservative than the
investment guidelines applicable under
the wrap contract before the
immunization period, with the intent of
closing any gap between the market
value of the wrapped assets and the
wrap contract book value. The BANA
RPT Global Wrap Agreement has what
is referred to as a ‘‘pull to par’’ provision,
so that the agreement will not terminate
(absent the application of another
termination provision, such as an event
of default) until the gap between the
market value of the wrapped assets and
the wrap contract book value is closed,
however long that takes. This ‘‘pull to
par’’ provision has become a market
standard provision and was included in
the BANA RPT Global Wrap agreement
prior to December 31, 2008. During the
immunization period, if all wrapped
assets were liquidated to fund book
value payments, and market value had
not converged with contract book value,
BANA would be obligated to pay the
remainder of the book value of the
contract.
22. According to the Applicants,
immunization of a wrap contract is
more protective of Plan participants and
beneficiaries than immediate
termination, if a substitute wrap
provider is not available. In this regard,
the Applicants state that if a substitute
wrap provider is not available,
immediate termination of the BANA
RPT Global Wrap Agreement or any
other wrap contract covering assets in
the Global Wrap Account at a time
when the book value exceeded the
market value would likely result in RPT
‘‘breaking the buck’’ (i.e., the value of
participants’ accounts would reflect the
market value, rather than the book
value, of assets that are no longer
covered by the BANA RPT Global Wrap
Agreement). If all or a portion of the
Global Wrap Account is immunized, the
returns would be reduced over time, but
participants would still receive the book
value of their account. In any event,
because immunization could result in
and hold’’ portfolio, instead of an actively managed
portfolio as covered by the BANA RPT Global Wrap
Agreement, immunization is not a feature of the
BANA RPT Buy and Hold Wrap Agreement. In this
regard, the Trustee may elect to terminate the
BANA RPT Buy and Hold Wrap Agreement by
giving BANA seven business day’s notice of such
election. Absent a default by the Trustee, if BANA
wants to terminate the BANA RPT Buy and Hold
Wrap Agreement, BANA would not agree to future
additions to, or substitution of assets in, the ‘‘buy
and hold’’ portfolio covered by the agreement. In
that event, the BANA RPT Buy and Hold Wrap
Agreement generally would terminate on the
maturity date of the latest maturing asset covered
by the agreement.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
61941
participants or Plan sponsors changing
investment alternatives and loss of
assets under management, BlackRock
Advisors would work to find a
substitute wrap provider as quickly as
reasonably possible.
Paragraphs 23–29. Applicants’
Representations and Request for Relief
Regarding the Execution and Operation
of the RPT Stable Value Wrap
Agreements
23. The Applicants seek exemptive
relief for: The operation of the RPT
Stable Value Wrap Agreements,
pursuant to the terms of; and for
transactions under the RPT Stable Value
Wrap Agreements. The Applicants
describe the operation of the RPT Stable
Value Agreements as including, among
other things, the following transactions
(the RPT Wrap-Related Transactions):
(1) The determination, calculation of,
and adjustments to, the Crediting Rate
and any changes to the Crediting Rate
formula; (2) valuations of securities
covered by the RPT Stable Value
Agreements; (3) payment of wrap fees
and any changes to wrap fees; (4) the
purchase and sale of any security
covered by the RPT Stable Value
Agreements; (5) BANA’s or the Trustee’s
exercise of its right to immunize or
terminate the RPT Stable Value
Agreements; and (6) amendments to the
RPT Stable Value Agreements.
24. According to the Applicants, the
provision of wrap coverage by BANA to
RPT could be considered an extension
of credit under section 406(a) of ERISA.
The Applicants state also that, because
BANA and Merrill are under common
control by BAC, and Merrill has an
approximate 34% equity ownership
interest in BlackRock, the maintenance
of and transactions under the BANA
RPT Stable Value Agreements could
give rise to self-dealing concerns under
section 406(b) of ERISA. In particular,
BlackRock Advisor’s role as investment
adviser raises a concern that it could
make investment decisions that are
designed to benefit BANA, to the
detriment of Plan participants and
beneficiaries.
25. The Applicants request that the
exemptive relief sought herein be
retroactive to January 1, 2009 (the date
of the Merrill/BAC Merger). The
Applicants state that retroactive relief is
appropriate because terminating the
BANA RPT Global Wrap Agreement
prior to the Merger could have caused
significant disruption to Plans and
participants and beneficiaries investing
in RPT. In this regard, if a substitute
wrap provider was not available to
replace BANA, immediate termination
of the BANA RPT Global Wrap
E:\FR\FM\06OCN2.SGM
06OCN2
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES2
61942
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 6, 2010 / Notices
Agreement or any other wrap agreement
covering assets in the Global Wrap
Account could have resulted in RPT
‘‘breaking the buck’’ (i.e., the value of the
participants’ accounts would have
reflected the market value (rather than
the higher book value) of assets no
longer covered by the BANA RPT Global
Wrap Agreement).
26. The Applicants propose a number
of conditions with respect to covered
transactions involving the RPT Stable
Value Agreements. In this regard,
effective June 1, 2009, BlackRock
Advisors may only change the formula
for calculating the Crediting Rate after
obtaining prior approval of BANA, the
other financial institutions that have
entered into wrap agreements covering
the same assets in the Global Wrap
Account or the Global Buy and Hold
Account, as the case may be, and the
Independent Fiduciary. BlackRock
Advisors shall provide the Independent
Fiduciary with any information it may
reasonably request in determining
whether to approve any proposed
change in the Crediting Rate formula.
Additionally, the Crediting Rate with
respect to a RPT Stable Value Wrap
Agreement may not be reset more
frequently than on a monthly basis,
unless: (1) Prior to such resetting, the
crediting rate with respect to a nonBANA wrap agreement covering assets
in the same Global Account as such RPT
Stable Value Wrap Agreement is reset
more frequently than on a monthly
basis; and (2) the Crediting Rate is reset
at the same time, and in the same
manner, as such other crediting rate.
Each financial institution entering into
a wrap agreement covering assets
included in a Global Account will
obtain information from BlackRock
Advisors on a monthly basis regarding
the investments that are included in
those accounts sufficient to enable the
financial institution to independently
verify that the Crediting Rate was
calculated properly. In addition, the
dollar amount of Global Wrap Account
assets covered by the BANA RPT Global
Wrap Agreement shall not exceed 50%
of the total assets held in such Account,
and the terms associated with the BANA
RPT Global Wrap Agreement at the time
such Agreement was entered into,
amended, modified or renewed shall be
no less favorable to RPT than the terms
associated with comparable agreements
with unrelated parties. Similarly, the
dollar amount of Global Buy and Hold
Account assets covered by the BANA
RPT Buy and Hold Wrap Agreement
shall not exceed 60% of the total assets
held in such Account, and the terms
associated with the BANA RPT Buy and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:35 Oct 05, 2010
Jkt 223001
Hold Wrap Agreement at the time such
Agreement was entered into, amended,
modified or renewed shall be no less
favorable to RPT than the terms
associated with comparable agreements
with unrelated parties. Further, any RPT
Wrap-Related Transaction that involves:
(1) The exercise by BANA, the Trustee,
or BlackRock Advisors of their rights
under the RPT Stable Value
Agreements; or (2) the performance by
BANA, the Trustee, or BlackRock of
their obligations under the RPT Stable
Value Agreements, shall be subject to
prior review and approval by the
Independent Fiduciary if such exercise
or performance affects the Crediting
Rate or would otherwise have an
adverse impact on the book value of a
participant’s or beneficiary’s investment
in RPT. Additionally, the Independent
Fiduciary must receive a copy of any
amendment contemplated for the RPT
Stable Value Agreements (other than
amendments that are purely ministerial
in nature), and must thereafter review
and approve the amendment prior to its
implementation.
27. The Applicants represent that the
fee BANA will receive under the BANA
RPT Global Wrap Agreement or the
BANA RPT Buy and Hold Wrap
Agreement will be reasonable relative to
market conditions and risks, as
determined and approved annually by
the Independent Fiduciary.
Notwithstanding this, in no event shall
the fee exceed the maximum percentage
fee paid to any other financial
institution that has entered into a wrap
agreement covering the same assets in
the Global Wrap Account or the Global
Buy and Hold Account, as the case may
be. Additionally, the Trustee will not
trigger immunization with respect to the
BANA RPT Global Wrap Agreement
unless: (i) The Trustee triggers
immunization with respect to another
wrap agreement (i.e., not provided by
BANA) covering the same assets in the
Global Wrap Account, immediately
prior to, or at the same time as,
immunization is triggered with respect
to the BANA RPT Global Wrap
Agreement; (ii) another financial
institution that has entered into a wrap
agreement with respect to assets in the
Global Wrap Account triggers
immunization immediately prior to, or
at the same time as, immunization is
triggered with respect to the BANA RPT
Global Wrap Agreement; or (iii) the
Trustee determines that BANA is no
longer financially responsible and the
Independent Fiduciary determines that
the immunization is in the interests of
investing Plans.
28. The Applicants represent that
assets held in RPT will be valued at
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
their current fair market value on a daily
basis. Valuations will be based on the
price that may be obtained in a current
arm’s-length sale to a third party. In this
regard, BlackRock will first obtain
prices for securities from independent
third-party sources, including index
providers, broker-dealers and
independent pricing services. To do
this, BlackRock will maintain a
hierarchy that prioritizes pricing
sources by asset class or type and will
value securities based on the price
generated by the highest priority source.
If no third-party sources are available to
value a security (or the price generated
by the third-party falls outside specified
statistical norms, and, after review,
BlackRock determines that such price is
not reliable), BlackRock will value the
security using an analytic methodology.
The Independent Fiduciary will
thereafter review that methodology and
valuation, and obtain its own valuation
if it deems appropriate. Each financial
institution that has entered into a wrap
agreement covering assets in the Global
Wrap Account and the Global Buy and
Hold Account, including BANA, has the
right to object to the valuation of a
particular security, regardless of the
source of the valuation. If such an
objection is made, wrap providers that
are not affiliated with BANA may
thereafter determine a new valuation for
the security, and BANA will be bound
by this new valuation notwithstanding
that BANA did not participate in the
determination of such valuation,
provided that BANA is provided with
reasonably satisfactory documentation
supporting the valuation.
29. Prior to a Plan sponsor’s decision
to include RPT as an investment option
for participants in the Plans it sponsors,
the Trustee will provide the Plan
sponsor with the following: The RPT
Declaration of Trust (as amended and
restated as of April 23, 2009, and as may
be further amended from time to time);
a purchase agreement to be entered into
by the Plan fiduciary and the Trustee;
upon request, a copy of the Annual
Report for RPT and a fact sheet
describing RPT’s investment objective
and strategy and a performance analysis;
and a copy of the proposed exemption
or the final exemption, if granted.
Additionally, on an ongoing basis, Plan
fiduciaries will receive the Annual
Report for RPT and the Plan’s
Investment Summary and Accounting.
Plan participants will also receive
information describing the investment
objectives and performance of RPT; and
a statement, delivered at least quarterly,
that sets forth the value of the
participant’s account contributions,
E:\FR\FM\06OCN2.SGM
06OCN2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 6, 2010 / Notices
withdrawals, distributions, loans and
change in value since the prior
statement.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES2
Paragraphs 30–40. Applicants’
Representations and Request for Relief
Regarding the Execution and Operation
of the RPT Special Purpose Wrap
Agreement
30. The Applicants represent that, in
the current market environment, there is
a significantly increased risk that the
credit rating of securities of the type
included in RPT will be downgraded,
including downgrades to below Baa3,
BBB¥ or BBB¥ by Moody’s Investors
Services, Inc., Standard & Poor’s Rating
Group, or Fitch Ratings, respectively
(Below Investment Grade Securities).
However, several wrap agreements in
RPT do not ‘‘cover’’ Below Investment
Grade Securities.11 If a security held by
RPT is no longer covered by a wrap
agreement, participant accounts (with
respect to Plans that invest in RPT) will
reflect the lower market value, rather
than the book value, with respect to the
portion of their account attributable to
the unwrapped security. This could
cause RPT to effectively ‘‘break the
buck.’’
31. To reduce the risk that Below
Investment Grade Securities would
cause RPT to ‘‘break the buck,’’ MLTC
and BANA entered into the RPT Special
Purpose Wrap Agreement on April 23,
2009. The RPT Special Purpose Wrap
Agreement is designed to cover
securities which cease to be covered by
a RPT wrap solely as a result of a
downgrade in the security’s credit rating
to below ‘‘investment grade.’’ Under the
RPT Special Purpose Wrap Agreement,
BlackRock Advisors will automatically
transfer each Below Investment Grade
Security to a new portfolio (the Type D1
Account), and that security will be
covered by the RPT Special Purpose
Wrap Agreement (hereafter, a Below
Grade Investment Security held in the
Type D1 Account and covered by the
RPT Special Purpose Wrap Agreement
shall be referred to as a Downgraded
Security). As described in paragraph 34
below, the RPT Special Purpose Wrap
Agreement is designed to rapidly
amortize the difference between the
amortized cost of a Downgraded
Security and the market value of the
Downgraded Security.12
11 In other words, these wrap agreements either
do not permit a cure period (i.e., a period of time
during which a downgraded security may be sold),
or have a cure period that is of a limited duration.
12 The Applicants state that securities that are
‘‘impaired’’ will not be transferred to the RPT
Special Purpose Wrap Agreement. The Applicants
generally describe an ‘‘impaired’’ security as: (a) A
security with respect to which the issuer or
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:35 Oct 05, 2010
Jkt 223001
32. The proposed exemption, if
granted, would permit certain
transactions in connection with the
operation of the RPT Special Purpose
Wrap Agreement. These transactions
(the Special Purpose Wrap-Related
Transactions) include: (1) The transfer
of Below Investment Grade Securities to
the Type D1 Account; (2) the sale or
transfer of Downgraded Securities out of
the Type D1 Account; (3) the purchase
and sale of certain other securities
permitted to be held in the Type D1
Account (the Permitted Securities, as
described below); (4) transactions
relating to maintenance of a minimum
ratio of Permitted Securities and
Downgraded Securities (the Minimum
Ratio, as described below); (5) the
determination, calculation of and
adjustments to the Type D1 Account
Crediting Rate (described below) and
any changes to the Type D1 Account
Crediting Rate formula; (6) valuations of
securities covered by the RPT Special
Purpose Wrap Agreement; (7) payment
of and any changes to wrap fees; (8)
BANA’s or the Trustee’s exercise of its
right to immunize or terminate the RPT
Special Purpose Wrap Agreement; and
(9) the entering into and amendment of
the RPT Special Purpose Wrap
Agreement.
33. Certain limits apply to the amount
of Below Investment Grade Securities
that may be transferred to the Type D1
Account. Specifically, the Type D1
Account may consist of up to a
maximum of $200 million in: (1) Book
value of Downgraded Securities that
have not been sold; and/or (2) aggregate
unamortized realized losses with
respect to Downgraded Securities.
BlackRock Advisors expects to sell
Downgraded Securities as market
conditions permit. Any remaining
unamortized losses associated with the
sale of the Downgraded Securities will
continue to be amortized under the RPT
Special Purpose Wrap Agreement.
34. In addition to Downgraded
Securities, the Type D1 Account will be
funded with Permitted Securities.
Permitted Securities are U.S. Treasury
debentures, Government National
Mortgage Association (GNMA)
securities and securities guaranteed by
the Federal Deposit Insurance
guarantor has failed to make one or more payments
of principal or interest; (b) a security with respect
to which the principal or interest has become due
and payable before it otherwise would have been
due or payable; (c) a security where the rate of
interest thereon has been reset; or (d) a security
with respect to which the issuer becomes insolvent
or institutes or has instituted against it a proceeding
seeking a judgment of insolvency or bankruptcy.
The Applicant states that an ‘‘impaired security’’
would remain in RPT and the Trustee would decide
whether to hold or sell such security.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
61943
Corporation (FDIC). The Applicants
state that these purchases have been
made, and the Type D1 Account
currently holds approximately $500
million in Permitted Securities. The
maximum modified duration of a
Permitted Security will be 3.5 years at
the time of purchase. The RPT Special
Purpose Wrap Agreement requires a
minimum ratio of 2.5 to 1.0 of market
value of Permitted Securities to the total
unamortized unrealized and realized
losses with respect to the Downgraded
Securities (the Minimum Ratio).13 This
Minimum Ratio is designed to ensure
that the Type D1 Account receives
sizeable investment gains, which, in
turn, would enable a more rapid
amortization of the losses included in
the RPT Special Purpose Wrap
Agreement. The Minimum Ratio will be
monitored on a daily basis, and if it
drops below 2.5 to 1.0, BlackRock
Advisors will correct the ratio within 10
business days either by moving
additional Permitted Securities into the
Type D1 Account or by selling
Downgraded Securities and using the
proceeds of those sales to reinvest in
Permitted Securities. Notwithstanding
the above, if the ratio is not corrected
within 10 business days of a breach of
the Minimum Ratio, BANA reserves the
right to terminate the RPT Special
Purpose Wrap Agreement immediately
without payment obligation.
35. The total book value of the assets
included in the D1 Account and covered
by the RPT Special Purpose Wrap will
not exceed $700 million without the
prior written consent of the Trustee,
BANA, and the Independent Fiduciary.
Additionally, the Type D1 Account
Crediting Rate will be 0.00% as of the
next following reset date at any time
when the book value under the wrap
agreement includes any unamortized
losses (realized or unrealized) on
Downgraded Securities. The reason for
using a 0.00% Crediting Rate is to
amortize losses as quickly as possible
and to maintain as much capacity as
possible to move additional Below
Investment Grade Securities into the
Type D1 Account to be covered by the
RPT Special Purpose Wrap Agreement.
If the book value under the RPT Special
Purpose Wrap Agreement does not
include any unamortized losses on
Downgraded Securities, the Type D1
Account Crediting Rate will be
13 The Applicants state that the RPT Special
Purpose Wrap Agreement permits the Trustee to
reduce the amount of Permitted Securities
(provided the Minimum Ratio is maintained) if the
ratio of the market value of Permitted Securities to
the total unamortized unrealized and realized losses
with respect to Downgraded Securities is greater
than 2.5 to 1.0.
E:\FR\FM\06OCN2.SGM
06OCN2
61944
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 6, 2010 / Notices
determined on a monthly basis using
the following formula:
Crediting Rate = [(PMV/PBV)I/(F*DUR) *
(1 + AYTM)] ¥ 1
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES2
Where:
AYTM = dollar duration weighted
annualized yield to maturity.
PMV = fair market value of assets in the Type
D1 Account (as reduced by accrued but
unpaid fees).
PBV = book value of the Type D1 Account.
DUR = modified duration (Macaulay duration
of the asset or assets * 1/(1 + the dollar
weighted annualized yield to maturity of
the asset)).
F = factor, if any, agreed upon by BlackRock
Advisors and BANA and approved by
the Independent Fiduciary.
36. The Applicants state that the Type
D1 Account Crediting Rate formula
would likely generate a higher return for
Participants on the assets applied to
purchase the Permitted Securities than
the approximately 40 basis point return
currently received if these assets
continued to be held in Type A cashequivalent investments. Effective June 1,
2009, BlackRock Advisors will not
change the Type D1 Account Crediting
Rate formula unless BANA and the
Independent Fiduciary agree to the
adjustment before it is made. BlackRock
Advisors must first provide the
Independent Fiduciary with any
information it may reasonably request in
determining whether to approve a
proposed change in the formula.
Additionally, the Type D1 Account
Crediting Rate itself will not be reset
more frequently than monthly.
37. Downgraded Securities and
Permitted Securities will be valued
using the same process applicable to
assets in the Global Wrap Account and
the Global Buy and Hold Account, as
described in paragraph 19 above, except
that the Independent Fiduciary will
review valuations of Downgraded
Securities and Permitted Securities
where BlackRock is unable to obtain a
reliable valuation from third party
sources and, if it deems appropriate, the
Independent Fiduciary will obtain an
independent valuation, which will be
binding upon BANA. Further, if BANA
objects to a valuation provided by
BlackRock, the Independent Fiduciary
will review the valuation and, if it
deems appropriate, the Independent
Fiduciary will thereafter obtain an
independent valuation. In that situation,
BANA will be bound by the valuation
determined by the Independent
Fiduciary.
38. The fee paid by RPT to BANA
under the RPT Special Purpose Wrap
Agreement was initially set at 15 basis
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:35 Oct 05, 2010
Jkt 223001
points per annum, payable quarterly.14
The fee must be reviewed annually for
reasonableness relative to market
conditions and risks, and approved by
the Independent Fiduciary in the
manner described in paragraph 47
below. Notwithstanding this, in no
event shall the fee exceed 15 basis
points. The fee will be based on the total
book value of assets included in the
Type D1 Account, including both the
Downgraded Securities and the
Permitted Securities.
39. The RPT Special Purpose Wrap
Agreement will not have a specified
term, but will be an ‘‘evergreen’’
contract. However, unless otherwise
agreed by BANA, the Trustee, and the
Independent Fiduciary, no Below
Investment Grade Securities will be
added to the RPT Special Purpose Wrap
Agreement after April 23, 2011. The
Trustee has the right to immunize the
portfolio of securities included in the
Type D1 Account only if BANA elects
to terminate the RPT Special Purpose
Wrap Agreement, or if BANA defaults
under the RPT Special Purpose Wrap
Agreement. If an immunization election
becomes effective (the RPT Special
Purpose Immunization Date), the RPT
Special Purpose Wrap Agreement would
terminate on the later of: (1) The date
that is the number of years after the RPT
Special Purpose Immunization Date
which does not extend beyond the
modified duration (as defined in the
RPT Special Purpose Wrap Agreement)
of the underlying assets on the RPT
Special Purpose Immunization Date; or
(2) the first date on which the market
value of the underlying assets equals or
exceeds the book value under the wrap
agreement. From the RPT Special
Purpose Immunization Date to the
termination date, the underlying assets
would be managed by BlackRock
Advisors in accordance with
immunization guidelines set forth in the
RPT Special Purpose Wrap Agreement.
This Agreement has a ‘‘pull to par’’
provision, as described above, and may
be terminated by the Trustee at market
value at any time, but the Trustee would
only do so if alternative wrap coverage
was available. According to the
Applicants, the Trustee generally would
not take this action unless the market
value of the assets in the Type D1
Account exceeded the book value of
those assets and another wrap provider
14 As described in further detail in paragraph 51
below, the Independent Fiduciary has submitted a
written report (the Report) to the Department
regarding the Special Purpose Wrap Agreement
arrangement. In the Report, the Independent
Fiduciary opined that a fee level of 15 basis points
is reasonable and within the range of fees paid by
RPT to other, unrelated wrap providers.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
agreed to provide a benefit responsive
facility with respect to those assets.
40. The Trustee has engaged the
Independent Fiduciary to monitor the
performance of BlackRock Advisors and
the Trustee with respect to the Type D1
Account and the RPT Special Purpose
Wrap Agreement. Under the terms of
this engagement, and as described in
part above, the Independent Fiduciary
must, among other things: (1) Determine
whether the RPT Special Purpose Wrap
Agreement and the Type D1 Account
arrangement are prudent and in the best
interest of participants and beneficiaries
of the Plans that have invested in RPT;
(2) make an initial and, thereafter,
annual determination regarding whether
the fee paid by RPT to BANA under the
Special Purpose Wrap Agreement is
reasonable relative to the specific
attributes of the RPT Special Purpose
Wrap Agreement; (3) make an annual
determination regarding whether the
continued maintenance of the RPT
Special Purpose Wrap Agreement is
appropriate and in the interest of Plans;
and (4) make a monthly determination
regarding whether the appropriate Type
D1 Account Crediting Rate formula is
being used and a monthly determination
regarding whether such appropriate
formula is being applied in proper
manner. Further, the Independent
Fiduciary must receive a copy of any
amendment contemplated for the RPT
Special Purpose Wrap Agreement (other
than amendments that are purely
ministerial in nature), and must
thereafter review and approve the
amendment prior to its implementation.
Finally, the Independent Fiduciary must
review and give prior approval for any
RPT Special Purpose Wrap-Related
Transaction that involves: (1) The
exercise by BANA, the Trustee, or
BlackRock Advisors of their rights
under the RPT Special Purpose Wrap
Agreement; or (2) the performance by
BANA, the Trustee, or BlackRock of
their obligations under the RPT Special
Purpose Wrap Agreement, if such
exercise or performance affects the Type
D1 Crediting Rate or otherwise would
have an adverse impact on the book
value of a participant’s or beneficiary’s
investment in RPT.
Paragraphs 41–49. Applicants’ Request
for Relief Involving the Separately
Managed Account Wrap Agreements
41. The Applicants also seek
exemptive relief for the provision and
operation of certain wrap agreements
applicable to two separately managed
accounts. In this regard, BlackRock
Advisors manages two separately
managed accounts, one on behalf of the
Hertz Plan (the Hertz Separately
E:\FR\FM\06OCN2.SGM
06OCN2
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 6, 2010 / Notices
Managed Account) and the other on
behalf of the Wal-Mart Plan (the WalMart Separately Managed Account).
These two separately managed accounts
(the Separately Managed Accounts)
operate in a manner that is substantially
similar to RPT while being set up for
individual employee benefit plans,
rather than contained as part of a
collective trust. MLTC is the directed
trustee for the Wal-Mart Separately
Managed Account. MLTC entered into
an agreement with BANA, dated August
19, 2003, and amended effective as of
December 31, 2008, pursuant to which
BANA provides a book value benefit
responsive facility with respect to a
portion of the assets held in the WalMart Separately Managed Account
(BANA Wal-Mart Separately Managed
Wrap Agreement). The Bank of New
York Mellon, as successor by operation
of law to Mellon Bank N.A. (Mellon) is
the trustee for the Hertz Separately
Managed Account, and Mellon entered
into an agreement with BANA and
BlackRock Advisors, as investment
manager, dated July 27, 2007, and
amended effective as of December 31,
2008, pursuant to which BANA
provides a book value benefit
responsive facility with respect to a
portion of the assets held in the Hertz
Separately Managed Account (the
BANA Hertz Separately Managed Wrap
Agreement).
42. The Applicants request that the
exemptive relief sought with respect to
the BANA Wal-Mart Separately
Managed Wrap Agreement and the
BANA Hertz Separately Managed Wrap
Agreement (collectively, the Separately
Managed Account Wrap Agreements) be
retroactive to January 1, 2009 (i.e., the
date of the Merrill/BAC Merger). The
Applicants state that retroactive relief is
appropriate since terminating the
Separately Managed Account Wrap
Agreements prior to the Merrill/BAC
Merger would have caused significant
disruption to the Plans and participants
and beneficiaries invested in the
Separately Managed Accounts. In this
regard, the Applicants represent that in
the current distressed economic
environment it is unlikely that a
substitute wrap provider could have
been found for BANA. If a substitute
wrap provider was not available,
immediate termination of the Separately
Managed Account Wrap Agreements
could have resulted in the Separately
Managed Accounts ‘‘breaking the buck’’
(i.e., the value of the participants’
accounts would have reflected the
market value (rather than the higher
book value) of assets no longer covered
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:50 Oct 05, 2010
Jkt 223001
by the Separately Managed Account
Wrap Agreements.
43. According to the Applicants, the
provision of wrap coverage by BANA to
the Separately Managed Accounts could
be considered an extension of credit
under section 406(a) of ERISA. The
Applicants state also that, because
BANA and Merrill are under common
control by BAC, and Merrill has an
approximate 34% equity ownership
interest in BlackRock, the operation of
the Separately Managed Account
Agreements, and certain transactions
engaged in under such Agreements,
could give rise to self-dealing concerns
under section 406(b) of ERISA. In
particular, BlackRock Advisor’s role as
investment adviser raises a concern that
it could make investment decisions that
are designed to benefit BANA, to the
detriment of participants in the Hertz
Plan and/or the Wal-Mart Plan.
44. The Applicants describe the
provision and maintenance of the
Separately Managed Account Wrap
Agreements as including the following
transactions (the Separately Managed
Wrap-Related Transactions): (1) The
determination, calculation of and
adjustments to the Crediting Rate and
any changes to the Crediting Rate
formula; (2) valuations of securities
covered by the Separately Managed
Account Wrap Agreements; (3) payment
of wrap fees and any changes to wrap
fees; (4) the purchase and sale of any
security covered by the Separately
Managed Account Wrap Agreements; (5)
BANA’s or the Trustee’s exercise of its
right to terminate the Separately
Managed Wrap Agreements; and (6)
amendments to the Separately Managed
Wrap Agreements.
45. The Separately Managed Account
Wrap Agreements are ‘‘buy and hold’’
arrangements and do not cover activelymanaged portfolios. The BANA WalMart Separately Managed Wrap
Agreement provides two levels of
‘‘buffers’’ which would be accessed
before any assets covered by BANA
would be used to provide benefit
responsive payments. More than 64.3%
of the assets in the Wal-Mart Separately
Managed Account consist of
investments held in these buffers,
referred to as Tier 1 and Tier 2. The
assets covered by the BANA Wal-Mart
Separately Managed Wrap Agreement
are included in the last tier to be
accessed (Tier 3) and, when accessed,
are only accessed on a pro-rata basis
with the assets covered by the seven
other Tier 3 Wrap Providers.15 The
15 The Applicants describe a Tier 3 Wrap Provider
as a financial institution that has entered into a
wrap agreement with respect to assets held in the
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
61945
BANA Hertz Separately Managed Wrap
Agreement has one buffer which is
accessed before any assets covered by
the BANA Hertz Separately Managed
Wrap Agreement would be accessed to
provide benefit responsive payments.
Sixty-three and a third percent of the
assets in the Hertz Separately Managed
Account are held in this buffer. After
the initial buffer is depleted for benefit
responsive payments, assets are sold
using the last-in-first-out principle.
Because the assets covered by the BANA
Hertz Separately Managed Wrap
Agreement are the assets in the Hertz
Separately Managed Account that
became subject to a benefit responsive
facility most recently prior to the date
of the Application, these assets will be
the first assets sold to satisfy benefit
responsive payments after the buffer is
depleted.
46. The Applicants propose several
conditions with respect to covered
transactions involving the Separately
Managed Wrap Agreements. In this
regard, under each Agreement, the
Crediting Rate was set at the inception
of the wrap agreement by BANA and the
counterparty and has been, and will
continue to be, reset periodically based
on a formula designed to amortize the
difference between the market value and
the book value of the assets covered by
the wrap agreement over the
approximate duration of the covered
assets. The Crediting Rate formula used
in the BANA Hertz Separately Managed
Wrap Agreement, effective March 1,
2009, is: Crediting Rate = [(PMV/
PBV)I/(F*DUR)*(1 + AYTM)]¥1.
The Crediting Rate formula in the WalMart Separately Managed Wrap
Agreement, effective March 1, 2009,16
is:
Net Crediting Rate = [((PMV/
PBV)I/(F*DUR) * (1 + AYTM))¥1]¥WF
Where:
PMV = market value of the covered assets.
PBV = book value of the covered assets.
AYTM = dollar duration weighted
annualized yield to maturity of the covered
assets.
DUR = modified duration {Macaulay
duration of the asset or assets * 1/(1+
dollar weighted annualized yield to
maturity of the asset or asset)).
F = factor, if any, agreed upon by BlackRock
Advisors and BANA and approved by the
Independent Fiduciary for purposes of
modifying the duration component of the
Crediting Rate.
WF = wrap fee rate.
Wal-Mart Separately Managed Account that will not
be accessed for purposes of making benefit
payments until two tiers of buffer assets are
accessed.
16 See footnote 6.
E:\FR\FM\06OCN2.SGM
06OCN2
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES2
61946
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 6, 2010 / Notices
Effective June 1, 2009, BlackRock
Advisors may only change the formula
for calculating the Crediting Rate after
obtaining prior approval of BANA and
the Independent Fiduciary.
47. BANA will not receive a fee under
the either the BANA Wal-Mart
Separately Managed Wrap Agreement or
the BANA Hertz Separately Managed
Wrap Agreement in excess of the
maximum percentage fee received by
any other Tier 3 Wrap Provider in the
Wal-Mart Separately Managed Account
or the BANA Hertz Separately Managed
Wrap Agreement, as the case may be.
Additionally, assets covered by the
BANA Hertz Separately Managed Wrap
Agreement and the BANA Wal-Mart
Separately Managed Wrap Agreement
will be valued in a similar fashion as
assets covered by the BANA RPT Stable
Value Agreements, except that, if BANA
objects to the valuation of any asset, the
Independent Fiduciary will make a
binding determination of the value of
the asset.
48. Pursuant to the investment
management agreements relating to the
Separately Managed Accounts,
BlackRock Advisors provides the named
fiduciaries of the Hertz Plan and the
Wal-Mart Plan with information
regarding investment performance and
the assets held in the Separately
Managed Accounts, including type of
asset, crediting rate, duration and credit
quality. In contrast with the BANA RPT
Stable Value Agreements, the Separately
Managed Account Wrap Agreements are
not global arrangements. Each
agreement provides coverage for 100%
of the book value of the specified assets.
Because the Separately Managed
Account Wrap Agreements are not
global arrangements, no wrap provider
(other than BANA) is involved in these
arrangements that, as an independent
third party, could protect against
potential conflicts of interests between
BANA and BlackRock Advisors. For this
reason, BlackRock Advisors and a
named fiduciary of the Hertz Plan, and
BlackRock Advisors and a named
fiduciary of the WalMart Plan, have
engaged the Independent Fiduciary to
perform the following tasks (which are
in addition to the duties described
above): (1) Conduct a monthly review of
the Crediting Rate; (2) analyze the
purchase or sale of any security,
including any change to the market to
book ratio, duration or Crediting Rate;
(3) review and approve any proposed
amendment to the BANA Hertz
Separately Managed Wrap Agreement or
the BANA Wal-Mart Separately
Managed Wrap Agreement; (4) review
any exercise of contract provisions by
any of BANA, BlackRock Advisors or, in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:35 Oct 05, 2010
Jkt 223001
the case of the BANA Wal-Mart
Separately Managed Wrap Agreement,
the Trustee, and analyze its potential
impact on investors; (5) provide
quarterly reports to BlackRock Advisors
and to the named fiduciaries of the WalMart Plan and the Hertz Plan stating,
among other things, whether BlackRock
Advisors has complied with all
requirements of its contract. The
Independent Fiduciary will also inform
the named fiduciaries of a Plan if it
believes that BANA or BlackRock
Advisors has taken any actions that are
not in the best interests of the
participants and beneficiaries in the
Wal-Mart Plan or the Hertz Plan, as
relevant. Consistent with this, the
Independent Fiduciary will review and
must give prior approval for any
Separately Managed Account WrapRelated Transaction that involves: (1)
The exercise by BANA, the Trustee, or
BlackRock Advisors of their rights
under the Separately Managed Account
Wrap Agreements; or (2) the
performance by BANA, the Trustee, or
BlackRock of their obligations under the
Separately Managed Account Wrap
Agreements, if such exercise or
performance affects the Crediting Rate
or otherwise would have an adverse
impact on the book value of a
participant’s or beneficiary’s investment
in the Separately Managed Accounts.
49. Each of the Separately Managed
Account Wrap Agreements effectively
may be terminated by terminating the
appointment of BlackRock Advisors as
investment manager. Under the Hertz
Separately Managed Account, the
named fiduciaries (or their authorized
representatives) of the Hertz Plan may
terminate BlackRock Advisors, as the
investment manager, on 30 days’ notice.
Under the Wal-Mart Separately
Managed Account, the named
fiduciaries (or their authorized
representatives) of the Wal-Mart Plan
may terminate BlackRock Advisors, as
the investment manager, on 90 days’
notice. Because each of the Separately
Managed Account Wrap Agreements
covers a ‘‘buy and hold’’ portfolio,
immunization is not a feature of either
agreement. BlackRock Advisors may
elect to terminate the Separately
Managed Account Wrap Agreements by
giving BANA seven business days’
notice of such election. Absent a default
by the counterparty, BANA may
terminate the Separately Managed
Account Wrap Agreements by failing to
agree to future additions to, or
substitution of assets in, the ‘‘buy and
hold’’ portfolio covered by the
agreement and then the agreement
generally would terminate on the
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
maturity date of the latest maturing
asset covered by the agreement.
Paragraphs 50–51. The Independent
Fiduciary
50. The Independent Fiduciary is
Fiduciary Counselors Inc., located in
Washington, DC. The Independent
Fiduciary is experienced and
knowledgeable in the transactions and
arrangements described herein. The
Independent Fiduciary is independent
of and unrelated to BANA, Merrill,
BlackRock and their Affiliates. In this
regard, the Independent Fiduciary
represents that, during any year of its
engagement, its annual gross revenue
from BANA, Merrill, and BlackRock has
not, and will not, exceed five percent
(5%) of the Independent Fiduciary’s
annual gross revenue from all sources
(for federal income tax purposes) for its
prior tax year.
51. In a written report dated April 2,
2009, submitted to the Department (the
Report), the Independent Fiduciary
made a number of representations
regarding the RPT Special Purpose
Wrap Agreement. In the Report, the
Independent Fiduciary stated that,
among other things: the RPT Special
Purpose Wrap Agreement is an
innovative solution to the ‘‘breaking the
buck’’ problem with a laudable objective
that clearly is in the best interests of
Plan participants; and it is likely that
the 15 basis point annual wrap fee
associated with the RPT Special
Purpose Wrap Agreement will soon be
industry average, if not lower than
average. Regarding the Type D1 Account
Crediting Rate, the Independent
Fiduciary stated that such crediting rate
arrangement is reasonable given that
BANA has a limited capacity to absorb
Below Investment Grade Securities, and
that additional capacity is not available
from anyone else. In the Report, the
Independent Fiduciary states further
that the investment management
flexibility (regarding the sale of Below
Investment Grade Securities) allowed by
the Special Purpose Wrap Agreement
benefits Plan participants because it will
enable sales to occur when market
conditions warrant, without the
imposition of constraints from the
wrapper contract. Additionally, the
Independent Fiduciary stated in the
Report that other provisions in the
Special Purpose Wrap Agreement are
within the norms for wrap contracts
between unrelated parties.
52. In summary, the Applicants
represent that the transactions described
herein satisfy the statutory criteria set
forth in section 408(a) of the Act and
section 4975(c)(2) of the Code because,
among other things: in the current
E:\FR\FM\06OCN2.SGM
06OCN2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 6, 2010 / Notices
distressed economic environment it is
unlikely that a substitute wrap provider
could be found for BANA; the interests
of affected Plans have been, and will be,
protected by the Independent Fiduciary;
and the fee received by BANA pursuant
to the arrangements described herein
will be reasonable relative to market
conditions and risks, as determined by
the Independent Fiduciary.
Notice to Interested Persons
Written notice will be provided to a
representative of each Plan invested in
RPT, and the named fiduciaries of the
Hertz Plan and the Wal-Mart Plan. The
notice shall contain a copy of the
proposed exemption as published in the
Federal Register and an explanation of
the rights of interested parties to
comment regarding the proposed
exemption. Such notice will be
provided by personal or express
delivery, or electronically if
correspondence between the relevant
parties is typically carried out
electronically, within 15 days of the
issuance of the proposed exemption.
Any written comments must be received
by the Department from interested
persons within 45 days of the
publication of this proposed exemption
in the Federal Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Chris Motta of the Department,
telephone (202) 693–8544. (This is not
a toll-free number.)
Citigroup Inc. and its affiliates (Citigroup),
the Citigroup 401(k) Plan, the Citibuilder
401(k) Plan for Puerto Rico (the Citibuilder
Plan and collectively with the Citigroup
401(k) Plan, the Participant Directed Plans),
the Citigroup Pension Plan (and collectively
with the Participant Directed Plans, the
Plans) (the Applicants), located in
Greenwich, CT. [Application No. D–11591]
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES2
Proposed Exemption
The Department of Labor is
considering granting an exemption
under the authority of section 408(a) of
the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974, as amended (the
Act) and section 4975(c)(2) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the U.S.
Code) and in accordance with the
procedures set forth in 29 CFR Part
2570, subpart B (55 FR 32836, 32847,
August 10, 1990).
Section I: Transactions
If the proposed exemption is granted:
(a) The restrictions of sections 406(a),
406(b)(1), 406(b)(2), and 407(a) of the
Act 17 shall not apply, effective June 22,
2009 (the Record Date), to:
17 For purposes of this exemption, references to
provisions of Title I of the Act, unless otherwise
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:35 Oct 05, 2010
Jkt 223001
(1) The acquisition of stock rights (the
Rights) by certain plans, described below in
Section I(a)(1)(A) through (C) of this
exemption, in connection with holding
shares of common stock of Citigroup Inc.
(Citigroup Stock) on the Record Date
established pursuant to an offering of such
Rights (the Offering) in accordance with the
Tax Benefits Preservation Plan (the Rights
Plan) by Citigroup Inc. (Citigroup), a party in
interest with respect to the following plans,
and/or the acquisition of Citigroup Stock and
the attached Rights by the plans in the future
pursuant to the Offering:
(A) The Citigroup 401(k) Plan (the
Citigroup 401(k) Plan);
(B) The Citibuilder 401(k) Plan for Puerto
Rico (the Citibuilder Plan and collectively
with the Citigroup 401(k) Plan, the
Participant Directed Plans); and
(C) The Citigroup Pension Plan (the
Citigroup Pension Plan and collectively with
the Participant Directed Plans, the Plans);
(2) The holding of the Rights by the Plans
until the date the Plans exercise or otherwise
dispose of the Rights or the expiration of
such Rights in accordance with the terms and
conditions of the Rights Plan, whichever is
earlier; and
(3) The exercise or other disposition of the
Rights by the Plans;
provided that the conditions in Section II of
this proposed exemption, as set forth below,
are satisfied.18
(b) The sanctions resulting from the
application of section 4975 of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the
Code), by reason of section 4975(c)(1)(A)
through (E) shall not apply, effective
June 22, 2009, to the acquisition of the
Rights by the Plans, described above in
Section I(a)(1)(A), and Section I(a)(1)(C)
of this proposed exemption; 19 provided
that the conditions in Section II of this
proposed exemption, as set forth below,
are satisfied.
Section II: Conditions
The relief provided in this proposed
exemption is conditioned upon
specified, refer also to the corresponding provisions
of the Code.
18 The Department’s determination to propose
relief for these transactions should not be viewed
as an endorsement of the Rights Plan, nor is it
offering any views as to whether such transactions
satisfy any other requirements of ERISA, the Code
or other relevant statutory provisions. Rather, this
proposed exemption is designed to place the Plans
and their participants and beneficiaries in the same
position as other holders of Citigroup Stock with
respect to the acquisition of the Rights and to
prevent the possible dilution of the Plans’
investment in the Citigroup Stock.
19 The Applicants represent that, because the
fiduciaries for the Citibuilder 401(k) Plan for Puerto
Rico have not made an election under section
1022(i)(2) of the Act, whereby such plan would be
treated as a trust created and organized in the
United States for purposes of tax qualification
under section 401(a) of the U.S. Code, jurisdiction
under Title II of the Act does not apply.
Accordingly, the Applicant is not seeking any relief
for the prohibitions, as set forth in Title II of the
Act, for the acquisition of the Rights by the
Citibuilder Plan.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
61947
adherence to the material facts and
representations described herein and as
set forth in the application file and upon
compliance with the conditions, as set
forth in this proposed exemption.
(a) The acquisition by each of the
Plans of the Rights occurred or will
occur in connection with the June 22,
2009 Offering made available by
Citigroup on the same terms to all
shareholders of the common stock of
Citigroup (the Citigroup Stock),
including the acquisition of the Rights
at no cost to the Plans;
(b) The acquisition of the Rights by
the Participant Directed Plans on the
Record Date resulted from an
independent act of Citigroup as a
corporate entity. The acquisition of the
Rights by the Plans in the future will
occur either at the direction of
individual participants (in the case of
the Participant Directed Plans), at the
direction of an Independent Fiduciary
(in the case of the Citigroup Pension
Plan), or in connection with in-kind
contributions to a Plan by Citigroup of
Citigroup Stock and attached Rights (a
Stock/Right Contribution), in each case
incidental to, and as a direct
consequence of, the purchase or other
acquisition of Citigroup Stock. All
holders of Citigroup Stock, which
include the Rights (other than an
Acquiring Person, as defined in the
Rights Plan), including the Plans, were,
and will continue to be, treated in the
same manner with respect to the
acquisition of the Rights;
(c) All shareholders of Citigroup
Stock, including the Plans acquired, or
will acquire, the same proportionate
number of Rights based on the number
of shares of Citigroup Stock held by
such shareholders, including the Plans;
(d) Except with respect to a Stock/
Right Contribution where the
determination to make the contribution
will be made by Citigroup as a corporate
entity, the acquisition of the Rights by
the Participant Directed Plans was
made, or will be made, pursuant to
provisions of each such plan for
individually-directed investment of
participant accounts;
(e) All decisions regarding the Rights
that will be made by the Participant
Directed Plans will be made in
accordance with the provisions of such
Participant Directed Plans for
individually-directed investment of
participant accounts by the individual
participants whose accounts in each
such Participant Directed Plan acquired
the Rights in connection with the
Offering, and if no instructions are
received, the Rights will expire in
accordance with the terms and
conditions of the Rights Plan;
E:\FR\FM\06OCN2.SGM
06OCN2
61948
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 6, 2010 / Notices
(f) All decisions regarding the Rights
(except in the case of an acquisition as
a result of a Stock/Right Contribution,
where the determination to make the
contribution will be made by Citigroup
as a corporate entity) will be made on
behalf of the Citigroup Pension Plan by
an Independent Fiduciary acting as an
investment manager.
(g) To the extent the Citigroup board
of directors exercises its rights under the
Offering to redeem the Rights at the
redemption price set forth in the
Offering, all shareholders of Citigroup
Stock will be treated the same,
including the Plans; and
(h) The acquisition of the Rights as a
result of a Stock/Right Contribution by
Citigroup to the Plans shall result from
a determination by Citigroup as a
corporate entity.
(i) Neither the Participant Directed
Plan participants nor the Citigroup
Pension Plan will pay any fees or
commissions in connection with the
exercise of the Rights other than the
aggregate Purchase Price with respect to
the Rights then being exercised and an
amount equal to any applicable transfer
tax or other governmental charge.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES2
Section III: Definition
The term ‘‘Independent Fiduciary’’
means an investment manager, as
described in section 3(38) of the Act,
that is:
(a) Independent of, and unrelated to,
Citigroup Inc. and its affiliates
(Citigroup), and
(b) appointed to act on behalf of the
Citigroup Pension Plan for the purposes
described in Section II.(f) above.
For purposes of this proposed
exemption, a fiduciary will not be
deemed to be independent of, and
unrelated to, Citigroup if: (i) Such
fiduciary directly or indirectly controls,
is controlled by, or is under common
control with Citigroup; (ii) such
fiduciary directly or indirectly receives
any compensation or other
consideration in connection with any
transaction described in this proposed
exemption, except that it may receive
compensation for acting as an
independent fiduciary from Citigroup in
connection with the transactions
described herein, if the amount or
payment of such compensation is not
contingent upon, or in any way affected
by such fiduciary’s decision; and (iii)
more than 5 percent of such fiduciary’s
annual gross revenue in its prior tax
year will be paid by Citigroup in the
fiduciary’s current tax year.
Effective Date: If granted, this
proposed exemption will be effective as
of June 22, 2009, the date of the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:35 Oct 05, 2010
Jkt 223001
announcement of the Offering and will
expire on June 10, 2012.
Summary of Facts and Representations
1. The Applicants are Citigroup Inc.
and its affiliates (Citigroup), the
Citigroup 401(k) Plan, the Citibuilder
401(k) Plan for Puerto Rico (the
Citibuilder Plan and collectively with
the Citigroup 401(k) Plan, the
Participant Directed Plans), the
Citigroup Pension Plan (and collectively
with the Participant Directed Plans, the
Plans). The Applicants requested this
relief in an application dated December
2, 2009 and a revised application dated
July 23, 2010 (the Application).
Citigroup Inc. is a global diversified
financial services holding company
whose businesses provide consumers,
corporations, governments and
institutions with a broad range of
financial products and services.
Citigroup has approximately 200
million customer accounts and does
business in more than 140 countries.
Citigroup currently operates, for
management reporting purposes, via
two primary business segments:
Citicorp, generally consisting of its
regional consumer banking businesses
and institutional clients group; and Citi
Holdings, generally consisting of its
brokerage and asset management and
local consumer lending businesses, and
a special asset pool. Citigroup’s
consumer and corporate banking
business is a global franchise
encompassing, among other things,
branch and electronic banking,
consumer lending services, investment
services, and credit and debit card
services. Citibank, N.A. (Citibank) is a
principal subsidiary of Citigroup. As of
September 30, 2009, Citigroup and its
subsidiaries had total consolidated
assets of approximately $1.89 trillion.
2. Citigroup sponsors the Citigroup
401(k) Plan and the Citigroup Pension
Plan, while Citibank sponsors the
Citibuilder 401(k) Plan for Puerto Rico.
These Plans are involved in the
transactions for which an exemption has
been requested. These Plans are
described, as follows:
(a) Citigroup 401(k) Plan: The
Citigroup 401(k) Plan is a stock bonus
plan, a portion of which is designated
as an employee stock ownership plan,
and contains within it a cash or deferred
arrangement under section 401(k) of the
Code and a qualified Roth contribution
program under section 402A of the
Code. The Citigroup 401(k) Plan is
intended to qualify under the provisions
of section 401(a) of the Code, and its
related trust is intended to be taxexempt pursuant to section 501(a) of the
Code.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
The Applicants represent that the
Citigroup 401(k) Plan allows
participants to direct investments of
their own contributions and a portion of
the employer contributions into several
investment alternatives, including
Citigroup Stock. In the event that
Citigroup, as a corporate entity, decides
to make an in-kind contribution of
Citigroup Stock and attached Rights (a
Stock/Right Contribution) to the
Citigroup 401(k) Plan, the participants
receiving a Stock/Right Contribution
can sell the Citigroup Stock (including
the attached Rights) and invest the
proceeds in any other fund offered in
the Citigroup 401(k) Plan immediately
upon such Citigroup Stock (and
attached Rights) being credited to the
participants’ accounts.20
The Citigroup 401(k) Plan is funded
through a trust of which State Street
Bank and Trust Company is the trustee.
Reliance Trust Company is the subtrustee for the Citigroup Stock fund
offered as an investment option in the
participant directed plans. The Plans
Administration Committee of Citigroup
Inc., a committee appointed by
Citigroup, is the Plan Administrator of
the Citigroup 401(k) Plan. The
Applicants state that the 401(k) Plan
Investment Committee is responsible for
making all investment decisions related
to the Citigroup 401(k) Plan, other than
those investment decisions made by the
participants and the decision to offer
Citigroup stock as an investment in the
Plan. Citigroup, as plan sponsor, is
responsible for making all decisions
regarding offering the Citigroup Stock
fund as an investment option under the
Citigroup 401(k) Plan.
As of June 22, 2009 (the Record Date),
the Citigroup 401(k) Plan had
approximately 180,935 participants and
total assets of $6,990,680,850. The
shares of Citigroup Stock held by the
Citigroup 401(k) Plan were valued at
approximately $393,394,961 as of the
Record Date, and comprised
approximately six percent (6%) of the
total assets in the Citigroup 401(k) Plan.
These shares represented approximately
seven percent (7%) of the total shares of
Citigroup Stock outstanding as of that
date.
(b) The Citibuilder 401(k) Plan for
Puerto Rico: The Citibuilder Plan is a
defined contribution profit sharing plan
which includes a qualified cash or
deferred arrangement intended to meet
20 In this regard, Section 408(e) of ERISA provides
a statutory exemption for the acquisition or sale by
a plan of qualifying employer securities (as defined
in section 407(d)(5)) if certain conditions are met.
The Department assumes that the Citigroup 401(k)
Plan is intended to satisfy the requirements of
section 404(c) of ERISA.
E:\FR\FM\06OCN2.SGM
06OCN2
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 6, 2010 / Notices
the requirements of section 1165(e) of
the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code
of 1994, as amended (the PR Code). The
Citibuilder Plan was established for the
exclusive benefit of the eligible
employees and beneficiaries of Puerto
Rican subsidiaries of affiliates of
Citibank. The Applicants assert that the
Citibuilder Plan is not intended to meet,
and has never in practice met, the
requirements of section 401(a) of the
Code. The Citibuilder Plan is subject to
Title I of the Act.
The Applicants represent that the
Citibuilder Plan allows participants to
direct investments of their own
contributions and employer
contributions into several investment
alternatives, including Citigroup Stock.
In the event that Citigroup, as a
corporate entity, decides to make a
Stock/Right Contribution to the
Citibuilder Plan, the participants
receiving a Stock/Right Contribution
can sell the Citigroup Stock (including
the attached Rights) and invest the
proceeds in any other fund offered in
the Citibuilder Plan immediately upon
such Citigroup Stock (and attached
Rights) being credited to the
participants’ accounts. The Applicants
assert that the Citibuilder Plan is
intended to satisfy the requirements of
section 404(c) of ERISA.
The Citibuilder Plan is funded
through a trust. The trustee of the
Citibuilder Plan is Banco Popular de
Puerto Rico. The Plans Administration
Committee of Citigroup Inc. is the Plan
Administrator of the Citibuilder Plan.
The Applicants state that the 401(k)
Plan Investment Committee is
responsible for making all investment
decisions related to the Citibuilder Plan,
other than those investment decisions
made by the participants and the
decision to offer Citigroup Stock as an
investment in the Plan. Citigroup, as
plan sponsor, is responsible for making
all decisions regarding offering the
Citigroup Stock fund as an investment
option under the Citibuilder Plan.
As of the Record Date, the Citibuilder
Plan had approximately 1,739
participants and total assets of
$18,318,896. As of the Record Date, the
shares of Citigroup Stock held by the
Citibuilder Plan were valued at
approximately $1,297,870 and
comprised approximately seven percent
(7%) of the total assets of the Citibuilder
Plan. These shares represented
approximately less than one percent
(0.02%) of the total shares of Citigroup
Stock outstanding as of the Record Date.
(c) The Citigroup Pension Plan: The
Citigroup Pension Plan is a frozen
defined benefit pension plan that
generally provided benefits to eligible
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:35 Oct 05, 2010
Jkt 223001
participants under a cash balance
formula. Certain participants who have
a protected benefit that was accrued
under a plan that was merged into the
Citigroup Pension Plan may be eligible
to have a portion of their benefit
calculated using a final average pay
formula (Grandfathered Participants).
Effective January 1, 2007, the Citigroup
Pension Plan was closed to new
participants. Effective January 1, 2008,
participants’ hypothetical cash balance
accounts ceased benefit accruals,
although these hypothetical accounts
will continue to accrue interest credits.
Grandfathered Participants are not
subject to the benefit accrual freeze and
continue to accrue benefits. The
Applicants assert that the Citigroup
Pension Plan is intended to qualify
under the provisions of section 401(a) of
the Code, and its related trust is
intended to be tax-exempt pursuant to
section 501(a) of the Code.
The Citigroup Pension Plan is funded
through a trust of which The Bank of
New York Mellon is the trustee. The
Plans Administration Committee is the
Plan Administrator of the Citigroup
Pension Plan. The Applicants state that
the Pension Plan Investment Committee
has oversight over all investment
decisions related to the Citigroup
Pension Plan.
As of December 31, 2008, the
Citigroup Pension Plan had
approximately 260,890 participants and
total assets of approximately
$11,285,250,916. The Applicants note
that the Citigroup Pension Plan did not
hold any Citigroup Stock as of the
Record Date.
3. The Applicants provide that
Citigroup has accumulated a substantial
amount of recognized net deferred tax
assets, such as net operating loss
carryforwards and tax credits (the Tax
Benefits), which is included in its
tangible common equity. As of
December 31, 2009, Citigroup had
recognized net deferred tax assets of
approximately $46.1 billion. Citigroup
expects to utilize the Tax Benefits to
offset future taxable income. The
Applicants assert that Citigroup’s
utilization of the Tax Benefits is in the
interests of all Citigroup Stockholders,
including the Plans, the participants
and beneficiaries.
The Applicants note that Citigroup’s
ability to utilize these deferred tax
assets to offset future taxable income
may be significantly limited in the event
that Citigroup experiences an
‘‘ownership change’’ as defined in
section 382 of the Code.21 Specifically,
21 The Applicants note that generally, an
ownership change occurs if the ‘‘five percent
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
61949
section 382 provides that a ‘‘loss
corporation’’ (i.e., a corporation with net
operating loss carryforwards and certain
other tax attributes) that experiences an
ownership change will generally be
subject to an annual limitation after the
ownership change on the use of such
attributes. The Applicants assert that in
Citigroup’s case, this means that, should
an ownership change occur, Citigroup
could experience a limitation on its
ability to utilize a portion of its tax
deferred assets. Since tax losses and tax
credits have finite carryover periods, the
limitation could negatively affect
Citigroup’s ability to use the tax losses
and tax credits before they expire. The
precise amount of the limitation that
would arise from an ownership change
under section 382 on Citigroup’s ability
to utilize its deferred tax assets would
depend on the value of Citigroup’s stock
and prevailing interest rates at the time
of the ownership change.
4. The Applicants state that given the
possibility of such negative
consequences, on June 9, 2009, the
board of directors of Citigroup adopted
the Tax Benefits Preservation Plan (the
Rights Plan) in order to preserve its
ability to use the tax benefits. It is
represented that the Rights Plan uses
mechanics and structures very similar to
traditional shareholder rights plans
(commonly known as ‘‘poison pill’’
plans) in that it creates disincentives for
those who engage in certain activities.
Unlike traditional shareholder rights
plans which are designed to deter
unsolicited takeover bids, section 382focused rights plans are designed to
protect tax assets by deterring actions
that could increase the likelihood of a
loss of tax assets.22 As is the case with
the Rights Plan, this is generally
accomplished by seeking to deter any
shareholder from accumulating
positions that would qualify such
shareholder as a ‘‘five percent
shareholder’’ under applicable tax laws.
The Applicants note that, as with the
many companies that have adopted
section 382-focused rights plans in the
past, the Rights Plan has the effect of
significantly diluting the value of the
shares of the shareholder whose
acquisitions of Citigroup Stock caused
shareholders’’ (as defined in section 382 of the
Code) of a loss corporation increase their percentage
ownership interest in the loss corporation by more
than 50 percentage points during a rolling three
year testing period.
22 The Applicants state that Citigroup’s Rights
Plan also differs from the traditional shareholder
rights plan in that the Rights Plan does not apply
to acquisitions of a majority of Citigroup Stock
made in connection with an offer to acquire 100%
of Citigroup Stock, and lasts for only 36 months.
Traditional shareholder rights plans generally last
for 10 years.
E:\FR\FM\06OCN2.SGM
06OCN2
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES2
61950
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 6, 2010 / Notices
the Rights Plan to become exercisable
(the Acquiring Person) by allowing all
other shareholders to purchase, for each
Right, preferred stock equivalent to one
share of Citigroup Stock but at half the
price of a share of Citigroup Stock at the
time of the purchase. Specifically, the
mechanisms by which the Rights Plan
works are as follows:
(a) In connection with the adoption of
the Rights Plan, on June 9, 2009,
Citigroup’s board of directors declared a
dividend of one preferred stock
purchase right (a Right) for each
outstanding share of Citigroup Stock.
The dividend was payable to holders of
record of Citigroup Stock on the Record
Date, as well as shares of Citigroup
Stock issued after such date and before
the Final Expiration Date (June 10,
2012). Unless and until the Rights
become exercisable (as described
below), the Rights are not severable
from Citigroup Stock, have no
independent voting or dividend rights
associated with them and can be
transferred only in connection with the
transfer of the underlying shares of
Citigroup Stock.
(b) Each Right will initially represent
the right to purchase, for $20.00 (the
Purchase Price), one one-millionth of a
share of Series R Participating
Cumulative Preferred Stock, $1.00 par
value per share (the Series R Preferred
Stock).
(c) The Rights are not exercisable
until the earlier of (i) the close of
business on the 10th business day after
the date (the Stock Acquisition Date) of
the announcement that a person has
become an Acquiring Person (as defined
in the Rights Plan) and (ii) the close of
business on the 10th business day (or
such later day as may be designated by
Citigroup’s board of directors before any
person has become an Acquiring
Person) after the date of the
commencement of a tender or exchange
offer by any person which could, if
consummated, result in such person
becoming an Acquiring Person. The
‘‘Distribution Date’’ is referred to as the
date that the Rights become exercisable.
(d) The Applicants state that it is
important to note that the Rights may
never become exercisable because
Citigroup retained the ability to
unilaterally (i) amend the Rights Plan in
any manner prior to the occurrence of
a Distribution Date, including by
modifying the definition of ‘‘Final
Expiration Date’’ and effectively
terminating the Rights Plan immediately
or (ii) redeem the Rights for $0.00001
per Right at any time prior to a
Distribution Date.
(e) After any person has become an
Acquiring Person, each Right (other
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:35 Oct 05, 2010
Jkt 223001
than Rights treated as beneficially
owned under certain U.S. tax rules by
the Acquiring Person) can be exercised
by the holder to purchase for the
Purchase Price a number of shares of
Series R Preferred Stock having a market
value of twice the Purchase Price.
Basically, all holders of these Rights
(other than the Acquiring Person) will
have the right to acquire one onemillionth of a share of Series R Preferred
Stock, which will be the economic
equivalent (e.g., the same voting rights,
dividend rights, trading price and
market value) of one share of Citigroup
Stock, for one-half (1⁄2;) of the price of
a share of Citigroup Stock as of the
Distribution Date. Any time after any
person has become an Acquiring Person
(but before any person becomes the
beneficial owner of 50% or more of the
Citigroup Stock), the board of directors
of Citigroup may elect to implement
such dilution remedy against an
Acquiring Person by exchanging any
Rights (other than the Rights
beneficially owned by the Acquiring
Person) for one one-millionth of a share
of Series R Preferred Stock per Right
(instead of having holders exercise
Rights and pay the Purchase Price).
(f) In the event that an Acquiring
Person causes an ownership change,
such Acquiring Person would almost
certainly suffer extreme dilution due to
the triggering of the Distribution Date
(and exercisability of the Rights under
the Rights Plan). This creates a
significant disincentive for any investor
to acquire a sufficient position, or to
increase its position in Citigroup Stock,
to cause such person to be treated as a
‘‘five percent shareholder’’ for section
382 purposes. In addition, while
exercise of the Rights by non-Acquiring
Person shareholders is not automatic,
any such shareholder who does not
decide to exercise the Rights would
almost certainly also experience
significant dilution.
(g) Citigroup’s board of directors may
redeem all of the Rights at a price of
$0.00001 per Right at any time before a
Distribution Date.
(h) Prior to the Distribution Date, the
Rights will be inseparable from the
corresponding Citigroup Stock and not
evidenced by a separate certificate and,
as a result, the Rights will not be
transferrable separately from the
corresponding Citigroup Stock. Instead,
the Rights will be evidenced by the
certificates for (or current ownership
statements issued with respect to
uncertificated shares in lieu of
certificates for) and will be transferred
with Citigroup Stock, and the registered
holders of Citigroup Stock will be
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
deemed to be the registered holders of
the Rights.
(i) After the Distribution Date, the
rights agent will mail separate
certificates evidencing the Rights to
each record holder of Citigroup Stock as
of the close of business on the
Distribution Date, and thereafter the
Rights will be transferable separately
from Citigroup Stock. The Rights will
expire on June 10, 2012 (the Final
Expiration Date), with no value, unless
the Rights are earlier exchanged or
redeemed or the Plan is amended by the
board of directors of Citigroup.
(j) At any time prior to the
Distribution Date, the Rights Plan may
be amended in any respect. At any time
after the occurrence of a Distribution
Date, the Rights Plan may be amended
in any respect that does not adversely
affect Rights holders (other than any
Acquiring Person).
(k) A Rights holder has no rights as a
stockholder of Citigroup as a result of
holding the Rights, including the right
to vote and to receive dividends. The
Rights Plan includes antidilution
provisions designed to maintain the
effectiveness of the Rights.
5. Citigroup issued a press release
regarding the adoption of the Rights
Plan on June 10, 2009. In addition,
shareholders of Citigroup Stock as of the
Record Date, including participants in
the Participant Directed Plans who were
invested in the Citigroup Stock fund,
were notified of the adoption of the
Rights Plan by letter, dated June 22,
2009 (the Record Date). The notice was
sent to active employees by electronic
mail (with the relevant link) and to all
others by first class mail. Shareholders
did not have to pay any amount to
acquire the Rights. As of the Record
Date, Citigroup had approximately
196,000 registered Citigroup Stock
shareholders of record. As of the Record
Date, there were 5,671,743,807 shares of
Citigroup Stock issued and outstanding.
On March 2, 2010, the Applicants
informed the Department that Citigroup
filed a February 26, 2010 preliminary
proxy statement, Schedule 14A,
pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (1934
Act), with the Securities Exchange
Commission (SEC) providing the
contents of the proxy statement that was
mailed to Citigroup stockholders, for the
Citigroup annual stockholders’ meeting
held on April 20, 2010. Proposal 6 of the
proxy statement asks that the
stockholders at the meeting ratify the
June 9, 2009 board of directors’
adoption of the Rights Plan. The proxy
statement noted that because the Rights
Plan protects the value of the deferred
tax assets for the benefit of all
E:\FR\FM\06OCN2.SGM
06OCN2
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 6, 2010 / Notices
stockholders, the board of directors
recommends that the stockholders vote
for ratification of the Rights Plan. On
April 26, 2010, the Applicants informed
the Department that Form 8–K, filed by
Citigroup on April 23, 2010 with the
SEC pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
the 1934 Act, reported that the proposal
to ratify the adoption of the Rights Plan
was approved by the stockholders at the
annual meeting held on April 20, 2010.
On April 23, 2010, Citigroup
shareholders ratified and approved the
adoption of the Rights Plan.
6. The authorized capital stock of
Citigroup consists of 15 billion shares of
Citigroup Stock, with a par value $0.01
per share, and 30 million shares of
preferred stock, without a par value per
share. The Citigroup Stock is traded on
the NYSE under the symbol of C. It is
represented that the closing price of the
Citigroup Stock on June 19, 2009, before
the Offering was $3.17 per share. On
June 22, 2009, the closing price of the
Citigroup Stock was $3.00 per share. It
is represented that sufficient shares of
the Series R Preferred Stock will be
available to satisfy fully all exercise
elections made in connection with the
Rights.
7. The Applicants note that the
acquisition by each of the Plans of the
Rights occurred or that will occur, in
connection with the holding or
acquisition of Citigroup Stock as a result
of the Offering made available by
Citigroup, on the same terms to all
shareholders of the Citigroup Stock,
including the acquisition of the Rights
at no cost. The Applicants assert that
neither the Participant Directed Plan
participants nor the Citigroup Pension
Plan will pay any fees or commissions
in connection with the exercise of the
Rights other than the aggregate Purchase
Price with respect to the Rights then
being exercised and an amount equal to
any applicable transfer tax or other
governmental charge.
8. Citigroup and its affiliates, as
employers any of whose employees are
covered by one or more of the Plans,
subject to Title I of the Act, and as
fiduciaries of one or more of the Plans,
are parties in interest with respect to
each such plan, pursuant to section
3(14)(A) and section 3(14)(C) of the Act,
respectively. In addition, Citigroup and
its affiliates, as employers any of whose
employees are covered by one or more
of the Plans, which are subject to Title
II of the Act, and as fiduciaries with
respect to one or more of such Plans are
disqualified persons with respect to
each such Plan, pursuant to section
4975(e)(2)(A) and section 4975(e)(2)(C)
of the Code, respectively.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:35 Oct 05, 2010
Jkt 223001
9. It is represented that the Citigroup
Stock, the Rights, and the Series R
Preferred Stock satisfy the definition of
‘‘employer securities,’’ as set forth under
section 407(d)(1) of the Act 23 and that
the Citigroup Stock and Series R
Preferred Stock satisfy the definition of
a ‘‘qualifying employer security,’’ as set
forth in section 407(d)(5) of the Act.
However, the Rights do not satisfy the
definition of ‘‘qualifying employer
securities,’’ as defined under section
407(d)(5) 24 of the Act because the
Rights, if considered separately from
Citigroup Stock as a security under
section 3(20) of the Act 25, is not stock,
a marketable obligation or an interest in
a publicly-traded partnership. Under
section 407(a)(1) of the Act, a plan may
not acquire or hold any ‘‘employer
security’’ which is not a ‘‘qualifying
employer security.’’ Further, section
406(a)(1)(E) of the Act prohibits the
acquisition, on behalf of a plan, of any
‘‘employer security’’ in violation of
section 407(a) of the Act. Section
406(a)(2) of the Act prohibits a fiduciary
who has authority or discretion to
control or manage the assets of a plan
to permit the plan to hold any
‘‘employer security’’ that violates section
407(a) of the Act.
The Applicants have requested
retroactive relief, effective as of June 22,
2009, the Record Date of the Offering,
from the prohibitions, as set forth in
Title I of the Act, for the acquisition and
holding of the Rights by the Plans. The
Applicants have also requested the same
retroactive relief from the prohibitions,
23 Section 407(d)(1) of the Act defines the term,
‘‘employer security,’’ as ‘‘a security issued by an
employer of employees covered by the plan, or by
an affiliate of such employer.’’
24 Section 407(d)(5) of the Act defines the term
‘‘qualifying employer security,’’ as an employer
security which is stock, a marketable obligation (as
defined in subsection (e)), or an interest in a
publicly traded partnership * * *’’
25 Section 3(20) of ERISA states that ‘‘security’’ has
the same meaning as such term under section 2(1)
of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
‘‘Securities Act’’). Section 2(1) of the Securities Act
defines the term ‘‘security’’ as ‘‘any note, stock,
treasury stock, security future, bond, debenture,
evidence of indebtedness, certificate of interest or
participation in any profit-sharing agreement,
collateral-trust certificate, preorganization
certificate or subscription, transferable share,
investment contract, voting-trust certificate,
certificate of deposit for a security, fractional
undivided interest in oil, gas, or other mineral
rights, any put, call, straddle, option, or privilege
on any security, certificate of deposit, or group or
index of securities (including any interest therein
or based on the value thereof), or any put, call,
straddle, option, or privilege entered into on a
national securities exchange relating to foreign
currency, or, in general, any interest or instrument
commonly known as a ‘‘security’’, or any certificate
of interest or participation in, temporary or interim
certificate for, receipt for, guarantee of, or warrant
or right to subscribe to or purchase, any of the
foregoing.’’
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
61951
as set forth in section 4975(c)(1)(A)
through (E) of the Code, for the
acquisition of the Rights by the
Citigroup 401(k) Plan and the Citigroup
Pension Plan.
10. The Applicants state that the
Rights will only be exercisable in the
event Citigroup experiences an
ownership change under section 382 of
the Code. The Rights will remain
outstanding until the Final Expiration
Date (or June 10, 2012), unless the
Rights are earlier exchanged or
redeemed pursuant to the terms and
conditions of the Rights Plan or the
Rights Plan is amended. The Applicants
assert that the Rights issued by
Citigroup are transferable only in
connection with the transfer of the
underlying shares of Citigroup Stock
and cannot be separated from the
Citigroup Stock unless and until such
Rights are exercisable. This means that
the Plans cannot simply refuse to accept
the Rights. Since the Rights are
inseparable from Citigroup Stock, it
would be impossible for the Plans to
hold Citigroup Stock (a qualifying
employer security) and not engage in a
prohibited transaction. Absent an
exemption, the Plans would have to
divest themselves of all Citigroup Stock
in order to not hold the Rights and
thereby avoid a prohibited transaction.
11. With regard to the Rights acquired
by the Participant Directed Plans and
potentially to be acquired in the future,
it is represented by plan design that the
participants of the Participant Directed
Plans control the assets in their
accounts in such Plans and that no plan
fiduciary had the authority to exercise
any control over such assets. Therefore,
on the Record Date, a Right attached to
each Citigroup Stock beneficially owned
by a participant’s account on that date
and, thus, the Rights were allocated to
the accounts of the participants in such
Plans in proportion to the Citigroup
Stock beneficially owned by each such
account. In the event that the
Participant Directed Plans acquire
Citigroup Stock in the future, a Right
will attach to each Citigroup Stock
beneficially acquired by each
participant’s account and, thus, the
Rights will be allocated to the accounts
of the participants in such Plans in
proportion to the Citigroup Stock
beneficially acquired by each such
account. In addition, it is represented
that each participant in the Participant
Directed Plans will be given the
opportunity to exercise the Rights upon
the Distribution Date in accordance with
the terms and conditions of the Rights
Plan. Accordingly, each participant will
be able to make an independent
decision whether to acquire Citigroup
E:\FR\FM\06OCN2.SGM
06OCN2
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES2
61952
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 6, 2010 / Notices
Stock (except in the case of a Stock/
Right Contribution as discussed below)
and the attached Rights in the future
and whether to exercise the Rights
following the Distribution Date and
receive shares of Series R Preferred
Stock with a value equal to twice the
Purchase Price.
12. With respect to the Citigroup
Pension Plan, it is represented that the
Citigroup Pension Plan did not hold any
Citigroup Stock as of the Record Date.
However, under the terms of the
Citigroup Pension Plan, the Pension
Plan Investment Committee of Citigroup
Inc., as the named fiduciary of such
Plan, has the authority to appoint a
third party manager unaffiliated with
Citigroup and its affiliates to serve as a
‘‘fiduciary’’ (within the meaning of
section 3(21)(A) of the Act) and an
‘‘investment manager’’ (within the
meaning of section 3(38) of the Act) (an
Independent Fiduciary) over all or a
portion of the assets of the Citigroup
Pension Plan. Under investment
guidelines applicable to the assets under
the supervision and management of
certain Independent Fiduciaries, such
Independent Fiduciaries may be able to
cause the Citigroup Pension Plan to
invest in Citigroup Stock in accordance
with sections 408(e) and 407 of the Act.
In the event that the Citigroup Pension
Plan acquires Citigroup Stock before the
Final Expiration Date, it is represented
that all decisions regarding the
acquisition (except in the case of a
Stock/Right Contribution as discussed
below), holding and exercise or other
disposition of Citigroup Stock and,
therefore, the Rights by the Citigroup
Pension Plan will be exercised by an
Independent Fiduciary. In addition,
Citigroup Inc. may in the future
contemplate making employer
contributions to one or more of the
Plans in shares of Citigroup Stock and
the Rights attached to such shares (a
Stock/Rights Contribution). The
determination to make such Stock/Right
Contribution will be made by Citigroup
as a corporate entity.
13. The Applicants represent that all
shareholders of Citigroup Stock on or
after the Record Date, including the
participants in the Participant Directed
Plans and any Independent Fiduciary of
the Citigroup Pension Plan, have the
ability to exercise the Rights acquired
with Citigroup Stock after the
Distribution Date through the close of
business on the Final Expiration Date,
unless earlier exchanged or redeemed in
accordance with the terms and
conditions of the Rights Plan. This
deadline for exercising the Rights was
implemented by Citigroup as the issuer
of the Rights. Neither the shareholders
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:35 Oct 05, 2010
Jkt 223001
(other than executive officers of
Citigroup who are also shareholders of
Citigroup Stock), the participants in the
Participant Directed Plans nor any
Independent Fiduciary had any voice in
setting the deadline with respect to the
Rights.
14. The Applicants assert that the
acquisition, holding, and exercise or
other disposition of the Rights by the
Plans, pursuant to the Offering, is in the
interests of and beneficial to such Plans
and to the participants and beneficiaries
of such Plans. The Applicants note that
the existence of the Rights Plan and
issuance of Rights is beneficial to the
Plans to the extent they are shareholders
of Citigroup Stock because the Rights
Plan is explicitly designed to preserve
Citigroup’s ability to utilize its Tax
Benefits (which in total had a reported
value of $46.1 billion as of December 31,
2009) and to avoid limitations on the
use of any portion of such amount.
Citigroup’s ability to utilize its Tax
Benefits has significant value to
Citigroup’s shareholders, including the
Plans that hold Citigroup Stock.
It is represented that the Plans’ ability
to acquire, hold and dispose of the
Rights is in the interest of participants
and beneficiaries because it allows them
to hold Citigroup Stock. If the requested
exemption were not granted, the
Applicants represent that the Plans
would not be permitted to acquire, hold
or dispose of the Rights. Since the
Rights are not severable from Citigroup
Stock until they become exercisable, the
Plans would not be permitted to
acquire, hold or dispose of Citigroup
Stock, even though the Citigroup Stock
itself is a qualifying employer security
and such actions are contemplated by
the statutory scheme of ERISA.
The Applicants assert that the Plans’
ability to exercise or otherwise dispose
of the Rights is beneficial to the Plans
because, if the Rights become
exercisable, they will allow the Plans to
acquire additional equity in Citigroup at
a discount on the same terms and
conditions as other holders of Citigroup
Stock. If the Plans held Citigroup Stock
but were not able to exercise the Rights,
the value of their shares would be
diluted significantly, resulting in harm
to the Plans. However, the Applicants
state that it is important to note that if
the Rights Plan is successful,
shareholders will be deterred from
becoming Acquiring Persons and the
Rights will never become exercisable.
15. It is represented that the
acquisition, holding, and exercise or
other disposition of the Rights by the
Plans will be protective of such Plans
and of the participants and beneficiaries
of such Plans in that all of the
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
shareholders of Citigroup Stock,
including the Plans, will be treated in a
similar manner with respect to the
Rights. In addition, all decisions
regarding the future acquisition (except
in the case of an acquisition as a result
of a Stock/Right Contribution, where the
determination to make the contribution
will be made by Citigroup as a corporate
entity), holding and exercise or other
disposition of the Rights by the
Participant Directed Plans will be made
in accordance with the provisions of
such Plans for individually-directed
investment of participant accounts by
the individual participants. All
decisions regarding the future
acquisition (except in the case of an
acquisition as a result of a Stock/Right
Contribution, where the determination
to make the contribution will be made
by Citigroup as a corporate entity),
holding and exercise or other
disposition of the Rights by the
Citigroup Pension Plan will be made by
an Independent Fiduciary.
16. It is represented that the
acquisition, holding, and exercise or
other disposition of the Rights by the
Plans is feasible and all shareholders of
the Citigroup Stock (other than an
Acquiring Person), including the Plans,
were, and will be, treated in the same
manner with respect to any past and
future acquisition, holding, and exercise
or other disposition of the Rights. With
regard to the fact that the past
acquisition and holding of the Rights
were consummated prior to obtaining an
exemption due to the timing of the
Offering, it is represented that the
fiduciaries were required to participate
in the Offering before requesting the
proposed exemption and such
fiduciaries had no control over the
timing of the transactions.
17. In summary, the Applicants
represent that the proposed transactions
satisfy the statutory requirements for an
exemption under section 408(a) of the
Act and section 4975(c)(2) of the Code
because:
(a) The acquisition by each of the
Plans of the Rights occurred or will
occur in the future in connection with
the holding or acquisition of Citigroup
Stock as a result of the Offering made
available by Citigroup on the same
terms to all shareholders of Citigroup
Stock, including the acquisition of the
Rights at no cost;
(b) The past acquisition of the Rights
by the Participant Directed Plans
resulted from an independent act of
Citigroup as a corporate entity. The
acquisition of the Citigroup Stock with
the attached Rights by (i) the Participant
Directed Plans in the future will occur
at the direction of individual
E:\FR\FM\06OCN2.SGM
06OCN2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 6, 2010 / Notices
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES2
participants, (ii) the Citigroup Pension
Plan at the direction of the Independent
Fiduciary, or (iii) as a result of a Stock/
Right Contribution where the
determination to make the contribution
will be made by Citigroup as a corporate
entity; in all cases, incidental to, and as
a consequence of, the purchase or other
acquisition of Citigroup Stock. All
holders of the Rights holding Citigroup
Stock (other than an Acquiring Person),
including the Plans, were, and will
continue to be, treated in the same
manner with respect to the acquisition
of the Rights;
(c) All shareholders of Citigroup
Stock, including the Plans acquired, or
will acquire, the same proportionate
number of Rights based on the number
of shares of Citigroup Stock held by
such shareholder, including the Plans;
(d) Except with respect to a Stock/
Right Contribution, the acquisition of
the Rights by the Participant Directed
Plans was made, or will be made,
pursuant to provisions of each such
plan for individually-directed
investment of participant accounts;
(e) All decisions regarding the holding
and exercise or other disposition of the
Rights that will be made by the
Participant Directed Plans will be made
in accordance with the provisions of
such Participant Directed Plans for
individually-directed investment of
participant accounts by the individual
participants whose accounts in each
such Participant Directed Plan acquired
the Rights in connection with the
Offering, and if no instructions are
received, the Rights will expire in
accordance with the terms and
conditions of the Rights Plan; and
(f) The authority for all decisions
regarding the acquisition, holding and
exercise or other disposition of the
Rights by the Citigroup Pension Plan
will be exercised by an Independent
Fiduciary.
(g) Neither the Participant Directed
Plan participants nor the Citigroup
Pension Plan will pay any fees or
commissions in connection with the
exercise of the Rights other than the
aggregate Purchase Price with respect to
the Rights then being exercised and an
amount equal to any applicable transfer
tax or other governmental charge.
Notice to Interested Persons
The Applicants represent that within
thirty (30) days of the date of
publication of the proposed exemption
in the Federal Register, the Applicants
will provide notice of the proposed
exemption (consisting of a copy of the
proposed exemption as published in the
Federal Register and the supplemental
statement required by Department of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:35 Oct 05, 2010
Jkt 223001
Labor Regulation Section 2570.43(a)(2),
(collectively, the Notice to Interested
Persons)) to (i) all current participants
(active and inactive) in the Participant
Directed Plans, and (ii) the current
Independent Fiduciaries (as defined in
the proposed exemption) of the
Citigroup Pension Plan. With respect to
the Participant Directed Plans, the
Applicants will provide all current
participants with the Notice to
Interested Persons, as well as an
explanatory cover letter, by first class
mail. The Notice to Interested Persons
may be included in the same package
that includes the quarterly statements
and other participant notices if the
timing of the mailing of the Notice to
Interested Persons coincides with the
timing of the mailing of such other
statements and notices. With respect to
the Citigroup Pension Plan, the
Applicants will provide the
Independent Fiduciaries with the Notice
to Interested Persons by electronic mail,
with a request for a delivery receipt for
the electronic mail.
The Department must receive all
written comments and requests for a
hearing no later than thirty (30) days
from the last date of the mailing of the
Notice to Interested Persons.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Wendy M. McColough of the
Department, telephone (202) 693–8540.
(This is not a toll-free number.)
The West Coast Bancorp 401(k) Plan (the
Plan) Located in Lake Oswego, Oregon
[Application No. D–11611]
Proposed Exemption
The Department is considering
granting an exemption under the
authority of section 408(a) of the Act
and section 4975(c)(2) of the Code and
in accordance with the procedures set
forth in 29 CFR Part 2570, Subpart B (55
FR 32836, 32847, August 10, 1990).26 If
the exemption is granted, the
restrictions of sections 406(a)(1)(A) and
(E), 406(a)(2), 406(b)(1), 406(b)(2), and
407(a) and the sanctions resulting from
the application of section 4975(c)(1)(A)
and (E) of the Code, shall not apply,
effective January 29, 2010, to: (1) the
acquisition of stock rights (the Rights)
by the Plan issued by the West Coast
Bancorp, Inc. (Bancorp), the Plan
sponsor and a party in interest with
respect to the Plan under the terms and
conditions of a Rights offering (the
Offering); and (2) the holding of the
Rights by the Plan until their expiration,
during the subscription period (the
26 For purposes of this proposed exemption,
references to the provisions of Title I of the Act,
unless otherwise specified, refer also to the
corresponding provisions of the Code.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
61953
Subscription Period) of the Offering,
provided that the following conditions
were met:
(a) The receipt of the Rights by the
Plan occurred in connection with the
Offering and was made available by
Bancorp on the same terms to all
shareholders (the Shareholders) of the
common stock of Bancorp (Common
Stock);
(b) The acquisition of the Rights by
the Plan resulted from an independent
act of Bancorp as a corporate entity, and
all holders of the Rights, including the
Plan, were treated in the same manner
with respect to such acquisition;
(c) All Shareholders of Common
Stock, including the Plan, received the
same proportionate number of Rights
based on the number of shares of
Common Stock held by such
Shareholders;
(d) All decisions regarding the Rights
held by the Plan were made by the
individual Plan participants whose
accounts in the Plan received the Rights,
in accordance with the provisions under
the Plan for individually-directed
investment of such account; and
(e) The Plan did not pay any fees or
commissions in connection with the
acquisition and or holding of the Rights.
Effective Date: This proposed
exemption, if granted, will be effective
as of January 29, 2010, the
commencement date of the Offering (the
Commencement Date).
Summary of Facts and Representations
The Parties
1. Bancorp, which maintains its
principal place of business in Lake
Oswego, Oregon, is the bank holding
company for West Coast Bank (the
Bank), its primary subsidiary. The Bank
maintains $2.7 billion in assets and
operates in 65 Oregon and Washington
state locations. As of the
Commencement Date, there were
87,171,915 shares of Common Stock and
121,328 shares of Series B Preferred
Stock (Series B Preferred Stock)
outstanding. As of March 9, 2010,
Bancorp was authorized to issue 250
million additional shares of Common
Stock in order to raise capital, as
discussed below.
2. Bancorp sponsors the Plan, a Code
section 401(k) profit sharing plan, for its
subsidiaries. As of the Commencement
Date, the Plan had 752 participants and
assets totaling $22,717,737.22. Under
the Plan, participants may make pre-tax
and after-tax 401(k) contributions.
Eligible employees may also make
rollover contributions into the Plan from
other employers’ qualified plans or from
IRAs. Further, the Plan allows
E:\FR\FM\06OCN2.SGM
06OCN2
61954
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 6, 2010 / Notices
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES2
participants to self-direct the investment
of their individual accounts pursuant to
section 404(c) of the Act. West Coast
Trust Company, a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Bancorp serves as the
Plan’s directed trustee (the Trustee).
3. The Plan provides participants with
several investment options, which
include the Federated Government
Obligations Money Market Fund (the
Money Market Fund) and the West
Coast Bancorp Employer Stock Fund
(the Stock Fund). The Money Market
Fund provides conservative investors
with current income and stable
principal. Accordingly, the Money
Market Fund invests primarily in a
portfolio of short-term U.S. Treasury
and government agency securities.
The Stock Fund allows participants to
invest voluntarily in the Common Stock.
As of January 19, 2010, the Plan held
454,923.56 shares of common stock or
approximately 0.52% of the then
outstanding shares of Common Stock,
with a value of $1,187,350 based on the
$2.61 closing price on the NASDAQ
Global Select Market. The Common
Stock trades under ticker symbol
‘‘WCBO.’’ As of the Commencement
Date, the Common Stock represented
approximately 5.23% of Plan assets as
of the Commencement Date.
Regulatory Involvement
4. From 2007 to early 2009, the value
of the Common Stock decreased by over
90 percent as a result of the stock
market crash, the subprime mortgage
crisis and the recession. Bancorp
represents that the Common Stock’s
price reflected the trend for comparable
bank stocks. Although Bancorp had
exposure to home mortgage loans that
were eventually written down, Bancorp
represents that it was not a recipient of
any funds from the U.S. Treasury’s
Troubled Asset Relief Program.
5. On March 30, 2009, the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)
and the Oregon Division of Finance and
Corporate Securities (DFCS) issued a
joint Report of Examination (ROE)
following a routine examination of the
Bank. The ROE, as summarized, stated
that the Bank had engaged in unsafe and
unsound banking practices by: (a)
Operating with management whose
policies and practices were detrimental
to the Bank; (b) operating with a board
of directors which failed to provide
adequate supervision over and direction
to the active management of the Bank;
(c) operating with inadequate capital in
relation to the kind and quality of assets
held by the Bank; (d) operating with a
large volume of poor quality loans; (e)
engaging in unsatisfactory lending and
collection practices; (f) operating in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:35 Oct 05, 2010
Jkt 223001
such a manner as to produce operating
losses; (g) operating with inadequate
provisions for liquidity; and (h)
operating in violation of Part 323 of the
FDIC Rules and Regulations, 12 CFR
Part 3234, concerning appraisals; and (i)
operating in violation of Part 353 of the
FDIC Rules and Regulations, 12 CFR
Part 353, concerning suspicious activity
reporting.
6. On October 15, 2009, the FDIC, the
DFCS and the Bank entered into a
Stipulation and Consent to the Issuance
of an Order to Cease and Desist (the
Consent Agreement) (FDIC–09–4536). In
the Consent Agreement, the Bank,
without admitting or denying alleged
charges of unsafe or unsound banking
practices and violations of law and/or
regulations, agreed to the issuance of an
Order to Cease and Desist (the Consent
Order). On October 22, 2009, the FDIC
and the DFCS issued the Consent Order
which essentially required the Bank to
take steps outlined in the Consent
Agreement. In this regard, The Bank was
required to increase its capital levels,
reduce underperforming assets, submit
plans for a securities issuance to the
FDIC, set capital and leverage ratios,
prevent fraudulent lending, and
eliminate dividends within certain time
frames.27 The Bank represents in its
Form 10–K (Annual Report Pursuant to
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934) filing for its fiscal
year ending December 31, 2009 that it
is in material compliance with all
aspects of the Consent Order. On July
15, 2010, the FDIC and DFCS issued a
joint termination of the Consent Order.
New Investment in the Bank
7. On October 23, 2009, Bancorp
entered into investment agreements
with 52 outside investors as part of a
private sale of $155 million of newlyissued preferred stock and warrants
issued by Bancorp (the Capital Raise).
Sandler O’Neill and Partners, L.P.,
Bancorp’s financial advisor with respect
to the Capital Raise, represented
Bancorp with the outside investors,
none of whom are parties in interest
with respect to the Plan.
During the Capital Raise, Bancorp
received net proceeds of $139.2 million
from the investors in exchange for
1,428,849 shares of mandatorily
convertible cumulative participating
preferred stock (the Series A Preferred
Stock), 121,328 shares of mandatorily
27 Bancorp
also entered a written agreement with
the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (the
Reserve Bank) and the DFCS on December 15, 2009,
agreeing not to take any dividends or other
payments representing a reduction in capital from
the Bank without the prior consent of the Reserve
Bank and the DFCS.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
convertible cumulative participating
preferred stock (the Series B Preferred
Stock), and Class C warrants (the Class
C Warrants), exercisable for a total of
240,000 shares of Series B Preferred
Stock (each at a price of $100 per share
together with certain other expired
warrants).
As a result of shareholder approvals,
on January 20, 2010, shares of Series A
Preferred Stock issued by Bancorp in
the Capital Raise were automatically
converted into an aggregate of
71,442,450 shares of Common Stock on
January 27, 2010. Shares of Series B
Preferred Stock issued in the Capital
Raise became automatically convertible
into 12 million shares of Common Stock
upon transfer of such preferred stock to
third parties in a ‘‘widely dispersed’’
offering.28 Finally, shares of Series B
Preferred Stock issuable upon the
exercise of the Class C Warrants became
automatically convertible into 12
million shares of Common Stock
following exercise of the Class C
Warrants and the transfer of the Series
B Preferred Stock issued by Bancorp to
third parties in a ‘‘widely-dispersed’’
offering.
Bancorp contributed the $139.2
million of proceeds from the Capital
Raise to the Bank, thereby improving
the Bank’s operating flexibility. In
addition, the regulatory capital ratios of
the Bank improved significantly as a
result of the Capital Raise.
The Offering
8. Following the Capital Raise,
Bancorp embarked on an effort to raise
$10 million in additional capital
through the Offering.29 The Offering
commenced on January 29, 2010 and it
expired on March 1, 2010 at 5 p.m. PST
(the Offering Expiration Date). The
shares of Common Stock issued in
connection with the Offering were listed
on the NASDAQ Global Select Market.
In the Offering, Bancorp distributed,
at no charge, the Rights to the
Shareholders of record on January 19,
2010 (the Record Date). The Rights
entitled the Shareholders to purchase
up to 5,000,000 shares of Common
Stock for a subscription price (the
Subscription Price) of $2.00 per share.
Each Shareholder received .31787
Rights for each share of Common Stock
they owned on the Record Date. The
Rights were allocated in whole numbers
28 Bancorp’s Form 10–K Report states, on page 35,
that for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009,
no conversion of Series B Preferred Stock can occur
until the condition of a ‘‘widely-dispersed’’ offering
of such stock has occurred, due to regulatory
reasons.
29 Bancorp apprised the FDIC and DFCS of the
Offering pursuant to the Consent Order.
E:\FR\FM\06OCN2.SGM
06OCN2
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 6, 2010 / Notices
only and were rounded down to the
nearest whole number.
9. The Rights could not be sold,
transferred or assigned, and they were
not listed for trading on the NASDAQ or
any other exchange or over-the-counter
market. Bancorp represents that the
Rights were nontransferable to allow
only legacy Shareholders the
opportunity to purchase additional
shares of Common Stock to help offset
the share dilution such shareholders
had incurred when the Preferred Stock
was acquired by the outside investors,
as discussed above in Representation 7.
Further, Bancorp states that the use of
transferable Rights would have allowed
persons other than legacy Shareholders
to acquire Common Stock at the below
market price; whereas, the Offering was
intended to benefit legacy Shareholders.
Any Rights that were not exercised by
the Shareholders expired.
As noted above, each Right entitled a
Shareholder an opportunity to purchase
one share of Common Stock at the
Subscription Price of $2.00 per share.
The Subscription Price, which was
established by the Bancorp’s Board of
Directors (the Board), was equal to the
implied per share value of the Common
Stock that was negotiated by the new
investors, as discussed above in
Representation 7. The Subscription
Price was not related to Bancorp’s book
value, results of operations, cash flows,
financial condition or the predicted
future market value of the Common
Stock after the Offering. In addition, the
Board did not make any
recommendations to the Shareholders
regarding whether they should exercise
their Rights but urged the Shareholders
to make independent decisions based on
their assessment of Bancorp’s business
and the risk factors associated with a
rights offering.
10. The Rights entitled the
Shareholders to a basic subscription
privilege (the Basic Subscription
Privilege) and an over-subscription
privilege (the Over-Subscription
Privilege). The Basic Subscription
Privilege entitled the Shareholders to
purchase one share of Common Stock at
the Subscription Price. The OverSubscription Privilege entitled
Shareholders to purchase as many
additional shares of Common Stock
available in the Offering as they wanted
at the Subscription Price. Shareholders
were required to exercise their Basic
Subscription Privilege in full before
they could exercise their OverSubscription Privilege. Additionally,
Shareholders were required to exercise
their Over-Subscription Privilege at the
same time they exercised their Basic
Subscription Privilege. However,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:35 Oct 05, 2010
Jkt 223001
Bancorp reserved the right to reject in
whole or in part any Over-Subscription
requests, regardless of the availability of
shares of Common Stock.30 Bancorp
represents that no Shareholders who
exercised their Basic Subscription
Privileges, including Plan Shareholders,
had their Over-Subscription requests
rejected either in whole or in part.
If the Shareholders collectively
exercised their Over-Subscription
Privileges in excess of the 5,000,000
shares authorized by Bancorp in the
Offering, Bancorp was required to fulfill
first all Basic Subscription Privileges.
Then, any remaining shares of Common
Stock were to be sold pro rata among the
Over-Subscription Shareholders based
on the number of shares for which the
over-subscribing Shareholders had
subscribed under their Basic
Subscription Privileges.
Request for Exemptive Relief and
Rationale
11. Bancorp represents that the Rights
satisfy the definition of an ‘‘employer
security,’’ which under section 407(d)(1)
of the Act is defined as ‘‘a security
issued by an employer of employees
covered by the plan, or by an affiliate of
such employer,’’ However, Bancorp
states that the Rights do not satisfy the
definition of a ‘‘qualifying employer
security,’’ as set forth in section
407(d)(5) of the Act, which defines the
term as an employer security which is
stock, a marketable obligation, or an
interest in a publicly-traded partnership
(provided that such partnership is an
existing partnership as defined in the
Code). Under section 407(a)(1) of the
Act, a plan may not acquire or hold any
‘‘employer security’’ which is not a
‘‘qualifying employer security.’’
Moreover, section 406(a)(1)(E) of the Act
prohibits the acquisition, on behalf of a
plan, of any ‘‘employer security in
violation of section 407(a) of the Act.
Finally, section 406(a)(2) of the Act
prohibits a fiduciary who has authority
or discretion to control or manage the
assets of a plan to permit the plan to
hold any ‘‘employer security’’ that
violates section 407(a) of the Act.
Because the Plan’s acquisition and
holding of the Rights would violate the
Act,31 Bancorp requests an
30 Bancorp
had reserved the rejection right, which
is customary in a rights offering by a banking
institution, to avoid any shareholder from acquiring
an ownership interest in Bancorp that would either
jeopardize Bancorp’s ability to claim certain tax
advantages, such as net operating losses, or require
Bancorp to first obtain approval from federal or
state banking authorities.
31 Other provisions of the Act that are implicated
by the transactions include section 406(a)(1)(A) of
the Act and the fiduciary self-dealing and conflict
of interest provisions section 406(b)(1) and (b)(2) of
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
61955
administrative exemption from the
Department. If granted, the exemption
would be effective on the
Commencement Date.
The Rights Disclosures
12. On February 3, 2010, Bancorp
posted a ‘‘Rights Offering Notice’’ on its
intranet for its employees. On February
4, 2010, Bancorp completed mailing a
prospectus for the Offering. Plan
Shareholders also received special
instructions entitled ‘‘Special
Instructions for Participants in our
401(k) Plan—What You Need to Know
about the Bancorp Stock Rights Offering
and Your 401(k) Account’’ (Special
Instructions). As discussed below, the
Special Instructions gave Plan
Shareholders, as opposed to non-Plan
Shareholders, different timeframes and
payment methods in which to exercise
their Rights.
Exercise of Rights
13. Shareholders were permitted to
exercise all, some or none of their
Rights. An election to exercise a Right
was irrevocable once made. Bancorp did
not charge any fees or sales
commissions to issue the Rights or to
issue shares of Common Stock to those
who exercised their Rights. However, if
Shareholders exercised their Rights
through a broker or other holder of their
shares, the Shareholders were
responsible for paying any fees that
person may have charged. No fees or
expenses were paid by the Plan.
14. To exercise their Rights, including
their Basic and Over-Subscription
Privileges, non-Plan Shareholders were
required to complete and submit a
Subscription Rights Certificate to Wells
Fargo, N.A. which acted as the
Subscription Agent for the Offering (the
Subscription Agent). The Subscription
Agent collected these payments and
held them in a segregated bank account
until the Offering was completed. Once
the Offering had been completed, the
Subscription Agent purchased the new
shares of Common Stock in accordance
with the terms of the Offering.
Generally, non-Plan Shareholders had
until 5 p.m. PST on the Offering
Expiration Date (i.e., March 1, 2010) to
the Act. In relevant part, section 406(a)(1)(A) of the
Act provides that a fiduciary with respect to a plan
shall not cause the plan to engage in a transaction
if the fiduciary knows or should know that the
transaction is a prohibited sale or exchange of any
property between a plan and a party in interest.
Section 406(b)(1) of the Act prohibits a fiduciary
from dealing with the assets of a plan in his own
interest of or for his own account. Section 406(b)(2)
of the Act prohibits a fiduciary with respect to a
plan from acting in any transaction involving the
plan on behalf of a party, or represent a party,
whose interests are adverse to the interests of the
plan or its participants and beneficiaries.
E:\FR\FM\06OCN2.SGM
06OCN2
61956
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 6, 2010 / Notices
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES2
exercise their Rights, but those who
held their shares in a brokerage account
had to comply with the earlier deadline
set by their particular broker.
15. To exercise their Rights, Plan
Shareholders were required to complete
and submit a Subscription Rights
Certificate and Election Form to the
Subscription Agent, which was not a
party in interest with respect to the
Plan, by 5 p.m. CST (3 p.m. PST) on
February 22, 2010 (the Participant
Expiration Time), six business days
before the Offering Expiration Date.32
From the Commencement Date to the
Participant Expiration Time, the
Subscription Agent was required to
provide the Trustee with daily reports of
the participants who submitted forms
and the number of Rights they chose to
exercise under both their Basic and
Over-Subscription Privileges.
In order to exercise their Rights, Plan
participants were not required to remit
any payments to the Subscription
Agent. Instead, participants were
required to have enough money
available in their Money Market Fund
accounts by the Participant Expiration
Time to pay for their Basic and OverSubscription Privilege shares (their
Subscription Prices).33 Because
participants were not likely to have
sufficient funds in their Money Market
Fund accounts initially, the Special
Instructions provided detailed
instructions about how participants
could transfer additional funds into the
Money Market Fund from other Plan
investment funds and specified the
timeframes in which to do so.
Participant directions to move funds in
the Money Market Fund from any other
investment funds in the Plan except the
Stock Fund had to be received by
February 17, 2010. Participant
instructions to move funds from the
32 Bancorp represents that the extra business days
were required to provide the Trustee, the
Subscription Agent for the Offering, the Plan’s
recordkeeper, the custodian for the Stock Fund and
the clearing agency for the Offering sufficient time
to process Plan participants’ elections to exercise
their Rights, tabulate and confirm the results,
liquidate the participants’ funds, confirm the orders
and the availability of the funds and remit payment
to purchase the shares.
33 Participants had to have sufficient funds to pay
for their Basic and Over-Subscription Privileges, but
they could choose the source of such funds from
within their individual accounts in the Plan. By
liquidating only the participants’ Money Market
Fund accounts rather than making a pro rata
liquidation from each of the Plan investment funds
in which participants were invested, Bancorp
explains that the Plan allowed participants to
choose which of their Plan investment funds they
wanted to liquidate to pay for their shares of
Common Stock. Thus, participants were not forced
to use money from other investment funds within
the Plan which they wished to keep invested at
their then current levels.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:35 Oct 05, 2010
Jkt 223001
Stock Fund into the Money Market
Fund had to be received by February 19,
2010 in order to allow additional time
to settle trades on the Common Stock.
16. As soon as practicable after the
Participant Expiration Time, the Trustee
froze the Money Market Fund accounts
of the participants exercising Rights34
and liquidated funds sufficient to cover
their Subscription Prices. If a
participant did not have enough money,
the Trustee (as instructed by Bancorp)
exercised that participant’s Rights to the
maximum extent possible with the
funds available. Once the Trustee was
finished liquidating funds, it lifted the
freeze on the Money Market Fund.
17. To provide the participants with
a contemporaneous confirmation of the
number of shares they had purchased in
the Offering while working within the
restrictions placed by the administration
system of the Plan’s recordkeeper, the
Stock Fund was credited with the
number of shares for which the
participants had subscribed and paid,
even though at the time those shares
had not yet been purchased.35 The
Special Instructions explicitly stated
that the use of the term ‘‘shares’’ only
indicated a pending trade and that the
actual shares they purchased would not
be officially credited to their accounts
until after the Offering had closed and
the shares had been purchased. For
these reasons, the Stock Fund was
frozen for those participants. The freeze
was in effect from the time the shares
were credited as a pending trade until
the shares were actually purchased and
credited to their accounts. Bancorp
informed participants that the freeze
would last until five to ten business
days after the Offering Expiration
Date.36
18. Because the Participant Expiration
Time was set six business days before
the Offering Expiration Date, Bancorp
explains that participants would
34 Bancorp states that the reason behind freezing
the participant’s Money Market Fund accounts was
to prevent the participants from moving money out
of such fund after the Participant Expiration Time
lapsed but before the Trustee could liquidate it.
35 According to Bancorp, the original intent was
to create a special temporary investment fund in the
Plan designated as the ‘‘Rights Offering
Subscription,’’ in order to show a counterbalancing
asset for the money that was liquidated from the
participants’ Money Market Fund. However, the
administrative system of the Plan’s recordkeeper
was unable to create this special account.
Consequently, the only available option was to
show the subscription rights as actual shares within
the Stock Fund, pending the actual purchase of
those shares.
36 Bancorp represents that the five to ten business
days allowed sufficient processing time for the
Subscription Agent to determine the number of
shares acquired in the over-subscription, for the
shares to be issued, and for the crediting of the
shares to the participants’ accounts.
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
possibly have been at a slight
disadvantage relative to non-Plan
Shareholders who had a few additional
days to observe the trading price of the
Common Stock and determine whether
they wanted to participate in the
Offering.37 Therefore, the Trustee was
instructed to note the public trading
price of the Common Stock on Friday,
February 26, 2010 (one business day
before the Offering Expiration Date). If,
on that date, the Common Stock last
traded at above $2.00 per share, the
Trustee was to exercise the participant’s
Rights pursuant to the terms of the
Offering as described above. If, however,
the Common Stock traded at $2.00 per
share or lower, the Trustee was to redeposit all money into the appropriate
participant’s Money Market Fund
account and delete the pending trade
from the participant’s account in the
Stock Fund.
If a Plan Shareholder instructed the
Trustee to exercise such participant’s
Rights, the Trustee was required to
remit the participant’s money to the
designated clearing agency for the
Offering, Depository Trust & Clearing
Corporation (DTC). DTC would then
purchase the Common Stock from
Bancorp, and the Trustee would credit
such participant’s account in the Stock
Fund with the corresponding shares. In
the event participants over-subscribed
to more shares than were available
under the Offering, the money
liquidated from the participant’s Money
Market Fund account to buy those
shares was re-deposited into the
appropriate account.
19. As of the Commencement Date,
339 Plan participants were eligible to
exercise a minimum of one Right.
However, only 70 or 20.1 percent of
Plan Shareholders exercised their
Rights. In addition, the Common Stock
never closed below $2.00 per share
during the entire Subscription Period.38
With respect to Plan Shareholders, the
closing price of the Common Stock on
February 26, 2010 was $2.63 per share
and was $2.59 per share on the
Expiration Closing Date. Accordingly,
the Trustee exercised the Rights for all
such Plan Shareholders at the same
time.
37 According to Bancorp, most of the non-Plan
Shareholders held their shares in brokerage
accounts. This meant that they had to send their
subscription elections to their brokers, who would
then patch those elections for their customers with
the election cutoff date set by their brokers, which
was typically several business days before the
Offering Expiration Date.
38 During this period, shares of Common Stock
closed as low as $2.47 per share on February 17,
2010 and as high as $2.80 per share on February
3, 2010.
E:\FR\FM\06OCN2.SGM
06OCN2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 6, 2010 / Notices
20. Bancorp represents that the
acquisition and holding of the Rights by
the Plan was administratively feasible,
in that the Offering was a one-time
transaction, and all shareholders of
Common Stock, including the Plan
shareholders, were treated in the same
manner with respect to the acquisition
and holding of the Rights. With regard
to the fact that Plan shareholders had
less time to decide whether to exercise
their Rights, Bancorp represents that the
various service providers involved in
the Offering, rather than Bancorp,
required the additional time.
Additionally, Bancorp explains that the
Offering included specific protections
instructing the Trustee not to exercise
the Rights of Plan Shareholders if the
Common Stock fell below the
Subscription Price. Further, Bancorp
states that the proposed exemption
would be in the best interests of the
Plan and its participants and
beneficiaries because Plan Shareholders
that exercised their Rights avoided the
dilution of their interests in Bancorp
and increased the value of their
individual accounts.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES2
Summary
21. In summary, Bancorp represents
that the transactions satisfied the
statutory requirements for an exemption
under section 408(a) of the Act because:
(a) The Plan’s receipt of the Rights
occurred in connection with the
Offering and was made available by
Bancorp on the same terms to all
shareholders of the Common Stock;
(b) The acquisition of the Rights by
the Plan resulted from an independent
act of Bancorp as a corporate entity, and
all Shareholders of the Rights, including
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:35 Oct 05, 2010
Jkt 223001
the Plan, were treated in the same
manner with respect to such
acquisition;
(c) All Shareholders of the Common
Stock, including the Plan, received the
same proportionate number of Rights
based on the number of shares of the
Common Stock held by such
Shareholders;
(d) All decisions regarding the Rights
held by the Plan were made by the
individual Plan participants whose
accounts in the Plan received the Rights,
in accordance with the provisions under
the Plan for individually-directed
investment of such accounts; and
(e) The Plan did not pay any fees or
commissions in connection with the
acquisition or holding of the Rights.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Anh-Viet Ly of the Department at (202)
693–8648. (This is not a toll-free
number.)
General Information
The attention of interested persons is
directed to the following:
(1) The fact that a transaction is the
subject of an exemption under section
408(a) of the Act and/or section
4975(c)(2) of the Code does not relieve
a fiduciary or other party in interest or
disqualified person from certain other
provisions of the Act and/or the Code,
including any prohibited transaction
provisions to which the exemption does
not apply and the general fiduciary
responsibility provisions of section 404
of the Act, which, among other things,
require a fiduciary to discharge his
duties respecting the plan solely in the
interest of the participants and
beneficiaries of the plan and in a
prudent fashion in accordance with
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 9990
61957
section 404(a)(1)(b) of the Act; nor does
it affect the requirement of section
401(a) of the Code that the plan must
operate for the exclusive benefit of the
employees of the employer maintaining
the plan and their beneficiaries;
(2) Before an exemption may be
granted under section 408(a) of the Act
and/or section 4975(c)(2) of the Code,
the Department must find that the
exemption is administratively feasible,
in the interests of the plan and of its
participants and beneficiaries, and
protective of the rights of participants
and beneficiaries of the plan;
(3) The proposed exemptions, if
granted, will be supplemental to, and
not in derogation of, any other
provisions of the Act and/or the Code,
including statutory or administrative
exemptions and transitional rules.
Furthermore, the fact that a transaction
is subject to an administrative or
statutory exemption is not dispositive of
whether the transaction is in fact a
prohibited transaction; and
(4) The proposed exemptions, if
granted, will be subject to the express
condition that the material facts and
representations contained in each
application are true and complete, and
that each application accurately
describes all material terms of the
transaction which is the subject of the
exemption.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 30th day of
September, 2010.
Ivan Strasfeld,
Director of Exemption Determinations,
Employee Benefits Security Administration,
U.S. Department of Labor.
[FR Doc. 2010–24892 Filed 10–5–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–29–P
E:\FR\FM\06OCN2.SGM
06OCN2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 193 (Wednesday, October 6, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61932-61957]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24892]
[[Page 61931]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Part III
Department of Labor
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Employee Benefits Security Administration
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed Exemptions From Certain Prohibited Transaction Restrictions;
Notice
Federal Register / Vol. 75 , No. 193 / Wednesday, October 6, 2010 /
Notices
[[Page 61932]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employee Benefits Security Administration
Proposed Exemptions From Certain Prohibited Transaction
Restrictions
AGENCY: Employee Benefits Security Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Notice of Proposed Exemptions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains notices of pendency before the
Department of Labor (the Department) of proposed exemptions from
certain of the prohibited transaction restrictions of the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA or the Act) and/or the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the Code).
This notice includes the following proposed exemptions: D-11576,
Bank of America, NA et al.; D-11591, Citigroup Inc. and its affiliates
(Citigroup), the Citigroup 401(k) Plan, the Citibuilder 401(k) Plan for
Puerto Rico the (Citibuilder Plan) and collectively with the Citigroup
401(k) Plan, the Participant Directed Plans, the Citigroup Pension Plan
(and collectively with the Participant Directed Plans, the Plans) (the
Applicants); and D-11611, The West Coast Bancorp 401(k) Plan (the
Plan); et al.
DATES: All interested persons are invited to submit written comments or
requests for a hearing on the pending exemptions, unless otherwise
stated in the Notice of Proposed Exemption, within 45 days from the
date of publication of this Federal Register Notice.
ADDRESSES: Comments and requests for a hearing should state: (1) The
name, address, and telephone number of the person making the comment or
request, and (2) the nature of the person's interest in the exemption
and the manner in which the person would be adversely affected by the
exemption. A request for a hearing must also state the issues to be
addressed and include a general description of the evidence to be
presented at the hearing.
All written comments and requests for a hearing (at least three
copies) should be sent to the Employee Benefits Security Administration
(EBSA), Office of Exemption Determinations, Room N-5700, U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC
20210. Attention: Application No. ----, stated in each Notice of
Proposed Exemption. Interested persons are also invited to submit
comments and/or hearing requests to EBSA via e-mail or FAX. Any such
comments or requests should be sent either by e-mail to:
``moffitt.betty@dol.gov'', or by FAX to (202) 219-0204 by the end of
the scheduled comment period. The applications for exemption and the
comments received will be available for public inspection in the Public
Documents Room of the Employee Benefits Security Administration, U.S.
Department of Labor, Room N-1513, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20210.
Warning: If you submit written comments or hearing requests, do not
include any personally-identifiable or confidential business
information that you do not want to be publicly-disclosed. All comments
and hearing requests are posted on the Internet exactly as they are
received, and they can be retrieved by most Internet search engines.
The Department will make no deletions, modifications or redactions to
the comments or hearing requests received, as they are public records.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Notice to Interested Persons
Notice of the proposed exemptions will be provided to all
interested persons in the manner agreed upon by the applicant and the
Department within 15 days of the date of publication in the Federal
Register. Such notice shall include a copy of the notice of proposed
exemption as published in the Federal Register and shall inform
interested persons of their right to comment and to request a hearing
(where appropriate).
The proposed exemptions were requested in applications filed
pursuant to section 408(a) of the Act and/or section 4975(c)(2) of the
Code, and in accordance with procedures set forth in 29 CFR Part 2570,
Subpart B (55 FR 32836, 32847, August 10, 1990). Effective December 31,
1978, section 102 of Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1978, 5 U.S.C. App. 1
(1996), transferred the authority of the Secretary of the Treasury to
issue exemptions of the type requested to the Secretary of Labor.
Therefore, these notices of proposed exemption are issued solely by the
Department.
The applications contain representations with regard to the
proposed exemptions which are summarized below. Interested persons are
referred to the applications on file with the Department for a complete
statement of the facts and representations.
Bank of America, NA et al. Located in Charlotte, North Carolina.
Exemption Application Number D-11576
Proposed Exemption
The Department is considering granting an exemption under the
authority of section 408(a) of the Employee Retirement Income Security
Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA or the Act), and section 4975(c)(2) of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), and in
accordance with the procedures set forth in 29 CFR Part 2570, Subpart B
(55 FR 32836, 32847, August 10, 1990).\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ For purposes of this proposed exemption, references to
section 406 of ERISA should be read to refer as well to the
corresponding provisions of section 4975 of the Code.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section I. Covered Transactions
If the proposed exemption is granted, the restrictions of sections
406(a) and 406(b) of the Act and the sanctions resulting from the
application of 4975 of the Code, by reason of section 4975(c)(1)(A)
through (F) of the Code, shall not apply: (a) Effective January 1,
2009: (1) To the operation of the RPT Stable Value Agreements, pursuant
to the terms thereof, and to the receipt of a fee by BANA in connection
therewith; and (2) to transactions under the RPT Stable Value
Agreements (the RPT Wrap-Related Transactions); (b) effective April 23,
2009: (1) To the execution of the RPT Special Purpose Wrap Agreement;
(2) to the operation of the RPT Special Purpose Wrap Agreement,
pursuant to the terms thereof, and to the receipt of a fee by BANA in
connection therewith; and (3) to transactions under the RPT Special
Purpose Wrap Agreement (the Special Purpose Wrap-Related Transactions);
and (c) effective January 1, 2009: (1) To the operation of the
Separately Managed Account Wrap Agreements, pursuant to the terms
thereof, and to the receipt of a fee by BANA in connection therewith;
and (2) to transactions under the Separately Managed Account Wrap
Agreements (the Separately Managed Account Wrap-Related Transactions),
provided that the following conditions, as applicable, have been met.
Section II. Conditions Applicable to Transactions Described in Section
I(a)
(a) Effective June 1, 2009, B1ackRock Advisors may change the
formula for calculating the Crediting Rate with respect to the Global
Wrap Account or the Global Buy and Hold Account (either, a Global
Account) only after obtaining prior approval from:
(1) Each financial institution that has entered into a wrap
agreement covering assets included in the applicable Global Account;
and
[[Page 61933]]
(2) The Independent Fiduciary, after BlackRock Advisors has
provided the Independent Fiduciary with any information that the
Independent Fiduciary has reasonably requested in determining whether
to approve the proposed change in the Crediting Rate formula;
(b) BANA may not reset a Crediting Rate attributable to a Global
Account more frequently than on a monthly basis unless:
(1) A crediting rate attributable to a non-BANA wrap agreement
covering assets in the same Global Account is reset more frequently
than on a monthly basis; and
(2) BANA resets the Crediting Rate at the same time, and in the
same manner, as such other non-BANA wrap agreement crediting rate;
(c) Each financial institution entering into a wrap agreement
covering assets included in a Global Account obtains information from
BlackRock Advisors on a monthly basis regarding the investments
included in such Global Account. This information must be sufficiently
detailed to enable the financial institution to independently verify
that the applicable Crediting Rate was calculated properly;
(d) The fee received by BANA in connection with the BANA RPT Global
Wrap Agreement or the BANA RPT Buy and Hold Wrap Agreement will be
reasonable relative to market conditions and risks, as determined
annually by the Independent Fiduciary. Notwithstanding the above, in no
event shall the fee received by BANA under the BANA RPT Global Wrap
Agreement or the BANA RPT Buy and Hold Wrap Agreement exceed the
maximum percentage fee paid to any other financial institution pursuant
to a wrap agreement covering assets in the applicable Global Wrap
Account or the Global Buy and Hold Account, as relevant;
(e) The Trustee may trigger immunization with respect to the BANA
RPT Global Wrap Agreement only if:
(1) The Trustee triggers immunization with respect to another wrap
agreement covering assets in the Global Wrap Account immediately prior
to, or at the same time as, the Trustee triggers immunization with
respect to the BANA RPT Global Wrap Agreement; or
(2) A financial institution not affiliated with BANA triggers
immunization with respect to assets in the Global Wrap Account
immediately prior to, or at the same time as, the Trustee triggers
immunization with respect to the BANA RPT Global Wrap Agreement; or
(3) The Trustee determines that BANA is no longer financially
responsible and the Independent Fiduciary determines that immunization
is in the interests of Plans invested in RPT;
(f) Assets held in RPT will be valued at their current fair market
value on a daily basis utilizing the following BlackRock firm-wide
approved valuation process:
(1) Valuations will be performed without regard to whether the
security is held in RPT or another account or commingled vehicle
advised by BlackRock;
(2) Valuations will be based on the price that may be obtained in a
current arm's-length sale to an unrelated third party;
(3) BlackRock will first obtain prices for securities from
independent third-party sources, including index providers, broker-
dealers and independent pricing services. BlackRock will maintain a
hierarchy that prioritizes pricing sources by asset class or type and
will value securities based on the price generated by the highest
priority source. The hierarchy may vary by asset class or type, but not
for a particular security;
(4) If no third-party sources are available to value a security or
the price generated by the third-party falls outside specified
statistical norms and after review BlackRock determines that such price
is not reliable, BlackRock will value the security using an analytic
methodology in accordance with its written valuation policy. If
BlackRock values a security using such analytic methodology, the
Independent Fiduciary will review that methodology and valuation and
will obtain its own valuation if it deems appropriate; and
(5) Values determined in accordance with (1) through (4) above will
be provided to each financial institution that has entered into a wrap
agreement covering assets in the Global Wrap Account or the Global Buy
and Hold Account, as the case may be;
(g) Each financial institution that has entered into a wrap
agreement covering assets in the Global Wrap Account and/or the Global
Buy and Hold Account, including BANA, may raise an objection regarding
a particular security's valuation, regardless of the source of such
valuation. Once an objection is raised, wrap providers other than BANA
may determine a new valuation for such security and BANA must accept
this new valuation, provided that BANA is given reasonably satisfactory
documentation supporting the new valuation;
(h) Prior to a Plan sponsor's decision to include RPT as an
investment option for its Plan's participants, the Trustee will provide
the Plan sponsor with the following:
(1) RPT's Declaration of Trust (as amended and restated as of April
23, 2009, and as may be further amended from time to time);
(2) A purchase agreement to be entered into by the Plan fiduciary
and the Trustee;
(3) Upon request, a copy of the Annual Report for RPT and a fact
sheet describing RPT's investment objective and strategy and a
performance analysis; and
(4) A copy of this proposed exemption or, if granted, a copy of the
final exemption;
(i) The Trustee will provide the following ongoing disclosures to
Plan fiduciaries regarding a Plan's investment in RPT:
(1) The Annual Report for RPT; and
(2) The Plan's Investment Summary and Accounting;
(j) Plan participants will be provided the following disclosures
regarding their investment in RPT:
(1) Prior to and following their initial investment, information
describing the investment objectives and performance of RPT; and
(2) A statement, delivered at least quarterly, that sets forth the
value of the participant's account contributions, withdrawals,
distributions, loans and change in value since the prior statement;
(k) The Independent Fiduciary must receive a copy of any RPT Stable
Value Agreement amendment prior to the effective date of such
amendment. The Independent Fiduciary must review and approve the
amendment prior to its implementation, except that no such review and
approval shall be required for an amendment that is purely ministerial
in nature;
(l) The dollar amount of Global Wrap Account assets covered by the
BANA RPT Global Wrap Agreement shall not exceed 50% of the total assets
held in such Account, and the terms associated with the BANA RPT Global
Wrap Agreement at the time such Agreement was entered into, amended,
modified or renewed shall be no less favorable to RPT than the terms
associated with comparable agreements with unrelated parties;
(m) The dollar amount of Global Buy and Hold Account assets covered
by the BANA RPT Buy and Hold Wrap Agreement shall not exceed 60% of the
total assets held in such Account, and the terms associated with the
BANA RPT Buy and Hold Wrap Agreement at
[[Page 61934]]
the time such Agreement was entered into, amended, modified or renewed
shall be no less favorable to RPT than the terms associated with
comparable agreements with unrelated parties; and
(n) Any RPT Wrap-Related Transaction that involves: (1) the
exercise by BANA, the Trustee, or BlackRock Advisors of their rights
under the RPT Stable Value Agreements; or (2) the performance by BANA,
the Trustee, or BlackRock of their obligations under the RPT Stable
Value Agreements, shall be subject to prior review and approval by the
Independent Fiduciary if such exercise or performance affects the
Crediting Rate or would otherwise have an adverse impact on the book
value of a participant's or beneficiary's investment in RPT.
Section III. Conditions Applicable to Transactions Described in Section
I(b)
(a) Below Investment Grade Securities will be transferred
automatically to a RPT account (the Type D1 Account) and covered by the
RPT Special Purpose Wrap Agreement. The RPT Special Purpose Wrap
Agreement shall cover up to in the aggregate $200 million of the
following:
(1) Book value of Downgraded Securities that have not been sold;
and/or
(2) Aggregate unamortized realized losses with respect to sold
Downgraded Securities;
(b) The Minimum Ratio shall be maintained;
(c) The total book value of the assets included in the Type D1
Account and covered by the RPT Special Purpose Wrap, including the
Permitted Securities, will not exceed $700 million without the prior
written consent of the Trustee, BlackRock Advisors, BANA and the
Independent Fiduciary;
(d) The crediting rate with respect to the Type D1 Account (the
Type D1 Account Crediting Rate) shall be 0.00% at times when there are
unamortized losses (whether realized or unrealized) attributable to
Downgraded Securities in the Type D1 Account, calculated in accordance
with the provisions of the RPT Special Purpose Wrap Agreement. In the
event there are no unamortized losses (i.e., neither realized nor
unrealized) recorded to the Type D1 Account which relate to Downgraded
Securities, the Type D1 Account Crediting Rate shall be determined in
accordance with a formula that has been reviewed by the Independent
Fiduciary;
(e) Effective June 1, 2009, BlackRock Advisors may change the
formula for calculating the Type D1 Account Crediting Rate only after
obtaining prior approval from BANA and the Independent Fiduciary.
BlackRock Advisors shall provide the Independent Fiduciary with any
information it may reasonably request in determining whether to approve
a proposed change in the Type D1 Account Crediting Rate formula;
(f) The Type D1 Account Crediting Rate will not be reset more
frequently than on a monthly basis;
(g) Permitted Securities will have a maximum duration of 3.5 years
at the time of purchase;
(h) The fee charged by BANA for the RPT Special Purpose Wrap will
be reasonable relative to market conditions and risks, as determined
annually by the Independent Fiduciary. Notwithstanding the above, in no
event shall the fee received by BANA under the BANA RPT Global Wrap
Agreement or the BANA RPT Buy and Hold Wrap Agreement exceed the
maximum percentage fee paid to any other financial institution pursuant
to a wrap agreement covering assets in the applicable Global Wrap
Account or the Global Buy and Hold Account, as relevant, as determined
annually by the Independent Fiduciary. Notwithstanding the above, in no
event shall such fee exceed 15 basis points per annum of the total book
value of assets included in the Type D1 Account;
(i) Assets covered by the RPT Special Purpose Wrap Agreement will
be valued in accordance with the methodology specified in section II(f)
above, provided, however, that if the Independent Fiduciary obtains a
valuation, such valuation will be binding on BANA;
(j) The Trustee has the right to immunize the portfolio of
securities included in the Type D1 Account only if BANA elects to
terminate the RPT Special Purpose Wrap Agreement, or if BANA defaults
under the RPT Special Purpose Wrap Agreement. If an immunization
election becomes effective (the RPT Special Purpose Immunization Date),
the RPT Special Purpose Wrap Agreement would terminate on the later of:
(1) The date that is the number of years after the RPT Special Purpose
Immunization Date which does not extend beyond the modified duration
(as defined in the RPT Special Purpose Wrap Agreement) of the
underlying assets on the RPT Special Purpose Immunization Date; or (2)
the first date on which the market value of the underlying assets
equals or exceeds the book value under the wrap agreement;
(k) No Below Investment Grade Securities will be added to the RPT
Special Purpose Wrap Agreement after April 23, 2011, unless otherwise
agreed by BANA, the Trustee, and the Independent Fiduciary. No party to
the RPT Special Purpose Wrap Agreement is obligated to amend or extend
the RPT Special Purpose Wrap Agreement;
(l) The tasks performed by the Independent Fiduciary will include:
(1) Determining whether the RPT Special Purpose Wrap Agreement and
the portfolio arrangement for the Type D1 Account (including the wrap
fee payable to BANA, the Minimum Ratio, the prefunding of the RPT
Special Purpose Wrap Agreement and the formula for resetting the Type
D1 Account Crediting Rate) are prudent and in the best interest of
participants and beneficiaries of Plans investing in RPT;
(2) Reviewing valuations generated by BlackRock (in connection with
the RPT Special Purpose Wrap Agreement) in any situation where
BlackRock is unable to obtain a reliable valuation from independent
third party sources. If, after such review, the Independent Fiduciary
deems appropriate, the Independent Fiduciary will obtain an independent
valuation which will be binding on the parties;
(3) Reviewing and monitoring whether the Type D1 Account Crediting
Rate is calculated correctly;
(4) Monitoring the addition and removal of Below Investment Grade
Securities and any changes in Permitted Securities in the Type D1
Account, and opining, in a written report, whether such addition,
removal or change is appropriate;
(5) If BANA objects to the calculation by the Trustee or its
designee of the Type D1 Account Crediting Rate or the information used
to calculate the Type D1 Account Crediting Rate, the Independent
Fiduciary will make a conclusive and binding determination regarding
such calculation or information;
(6) Determining whether to approve any proposed change to the Type
D1 Account Crediting Rate formula, including any proposed adjustment to
the duration component of the Type D1 Account Crediting Rate formula;
(7) No later than April 30, 2011, working with BANA, BlackRock, and
the Trustee to review and determine whether additional Below Investment
Grade Securities may be transferred to the Type D1 Account and be
covered by the RPT Special Purpose Wrap Agreement;
(8) Making an initial and, thereafter, annual determination
regarding whether the fee described in paragraph (h) of this section is
reasonable relative to the specific attributes of the RPT Special
Purpose Wrap Agreement;
[[Page 61935]]
(9) Making an annual determination regarding whether the continued
maintenance of the RPT Special Purpose Wrap Agreement is appropriate
and in the interest of Plans;
(10) Making a monthly determination regarding whether the
appropriate Type D1 Crediting Rate formula is being used; and
(11) Reviewing and approving any amendment to a RPT Special Purpose
Wrap Agreement consistent with paragraph (n) of this section;
(m) Any Special Purpose Wrap-Related Transaction that involves: (1)
The exercise by BANA, the Trustee, or BlackRock Advisors of their
rights under the RPT Special Purpose Wrap Agreement; or (2) the
performance by BANA, the Trustee, or BlackRock of their obligations
under the RPT Special Purpose Wrap Agreement, shall be subject to prior
review and approval by the Independent Fiduciary if such exercise or
performance affects the Type D1 Crediting Rate or otherwise would have
an adverse impact on the book value of a participant's or beneficiary's
investment in RPT; and
(n) The Independent Fiduciary must receive a copy of any RPT
Special Purpose Wrap Agreement amendment prior to the effective date of
such amendment. The Independent Fiduciary must review and approve the
amendment prior to its implementation, except that no such review and
approval shall be required for an amendment that is purely ministerial
in nature.
Section IV. Conditions Applicable to Transactions Described in Section
I(c)
(a) Effective June 1, 2009, BlackRock Advisors may change the
formula for calculating the Crediting Rate with respect to each
Separately Managed Account Wrap Agreement only after obtaining prior
approval from BANA and the Independent Fiduciary. BlackRock Advisors
shall provide the Independent Fiduciary with any information it may
reasonably request in determining whether to approve a proposed change
in the Crediting Rate formula;
(b) Effective June 1, 2009, the Crediting Rate will be reset no
more frequently than on a monthly basis;
(c) BANA will not receive a fee under the BANA Wal-Mart Separately
Managed Wrap Agreement in excess of the maximum percentage fee received
by any other Tier 3 Wrap Provider in the Wal-Mart Separately Managed
Account; and BANA will not receive a fee under the BANA Hertz
Separately Managed Wrap Agreement in excess of the maximum percentage
fee received by any other financial institution that has entered into a
wrap agreement covering assets in the Hertz Separately Managed Account;
(d) Assets covered under each Separately Managed Account Wrap
Agreement will be valued in accordance with the same methodology
specified in section II(f) above; provided, however, that if BANA
objects to the valuation of any asset, the Independent Fiduciary will
make a binding determination of the value of the asset;
(e) The tasks performed by the Independent Fiduciary will include:
(1) Conducting a monthly review of the Crediting Rate, including,
confirming: (A) The book value of the portfolio of assets wrapped by
each Separately Managed Account Wrap Agreement; (B) the valuation of
securities; (C) the duration of securities; (D) the market yield of
securities; and (E) that the Crediting Rate formula was calculated
properly;
(2) Reviewing and approving any proposed amendment to a Separately
Managed Wrap Agreement consistent with paragraph (i) below;
(3) Reviewing any exercise of contract provisions by any of BANA,
BlackRock Advisors or, in the case of the BANA Wal-Mart Separately
Managed Wrap Agreement, the Trustee, and analyze its potential impact
on investors;
(4) Evaluating any changes to the fees paid to BANA under each
Separately Managed Account Wrap Agreement to determine reasonableness
relative to market conditions and risks; and
(5) Providing quarterly reports to BlackRock Advisors and to the
named fiduciaries of the Wal-Mart Plan and the Hertz Plan. These
reports must certify that the Independent Fiduciary has reviewed the
factors described above and state whether BlackRock Advisors has
complied with all requirements of the contract. The Independent
Fiduciary will inform the named fiduciaries of a Plan if it believes
that BANA or BlackRock Advisors has taken any actions that are not in
the best interests of the participants and beneficiaries in the Wal-
Mart Plan or the Hertz Plan, as relevant;
(f) The Separately Managed Account Wrap Agreements shall authorize
the Independent Fiduciary to:
(1) Review and approve any proposed changes in the formula for
calculating the Crediting Rate, prior to implementation of any such
change;
(2) If BlackRock Advisors generates its own valuation, review the
valuation, and if the Independent Fiduciary deems appropriate, obtain
an independent valuation, which shall be binding on the parties,
subject to BANA's right to raise an objection to any valuation;
(3) If BANA objects to the valuation of any asset, make a binding
determination of the value of the asset;
(g) The named fiduciaries (or their authorized representatives) for
the Wal-Mart Plan have the right to terminate BlackRock Advisors, as
investment manager for the Wal-Mart Separately Managed Account, on 90
days' written notice. The named fiduciaries (or their authorized
representatives) for the Hertz Plan have the right to terminate
B1ackRock Advisors as investment manager for the Hertz Separately
Managed Account, on 30 days' written notice;
(h) Any Separately Managed Account Wrap-Related Transaction that
involves: (1) The exercise by BANA, the Trustee, or BlackRock Advisors
of their rights under a Separately Managed Account Wrap Agreement; or
(2) the performance by BANA, the Trustee, or BlackRock of their
obligations under a Separately Managed Wrap Agreement: shall be subject
to prior review and approval by the Independent Fiduciary if such
exercise or performance affects the Crediting Rate or otherwise would
have an adverse impact on the book value of a participant's or
beneficiary's investment in RPT;
(i) The Independent Fiduciary must receive a copy of any amendment
contemplated for a Separately Managed Wrap Agreement. The Independent
Fiduciary must review and approve the amendment prior to its
implementation, except that no such review and approval shall be
required for an amendment that is purely ministerial in nature; and
(j) BlackRock may not terminate a Separately Managed Account Wrap
Agreement without the prior approval of the Independent Fiduciary.
Section V. General Conditions
(a) BlackRock Advisors shall maintain in the United States the
records necessary to enable the persons described in (b) below to
determine whether the conditions of this exemption, if granted, were
met, except that:
(1) If the records necessary to enable the persons described in (b)
below to determine whether the conditions of the exemption have been
met are lost or destroyed, due to circumstances beyond the control of
BlackRock Advisors, then no prohibited transaction will be considered
to have occurred solely on the basis of the unavailability of those
records; and
(2) No party in interest other than BlackRock Advisors shall be
subject to the civil penalty that may be assessed under section 502(i)
of the Act or to the taxes imposed by sections 4975(a) and
[[Page 61936]]
(b) of the Code if the records have not been maintained or are not
available for examination as required by paragraph (b) below;
(b) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section V and
notwithstanding the provisions of subsections (a)(2) and (b) of section
504 of the Act, the records referred to in section V(a) are
unconditionally available for examination during normal business hours
at their customary location to the following persons or an authorized
representative thereof:
(1) Any duly authorized employee or representative of the
Department or the Internal Revenue Service;
(2) Any fiduciary of a Plan participating in RPT or the Hertz Plan
or the Wal-Mart Plan;
(3) Any participant or beneficiary of a Plan participating in RPT
or the Hertz Plan or the Wal-Mart Plan; or
(4) The Independent Fiduciary.
(c) None of the persons described above in paragraphs (2), (3), and
(4) of paragraph (b) of this section V shall be authorized to examine
trade secrets of BlackRock, BANA, the Trustee or any of their
Affiliates, or any commercial or financial information which is
privileged or confidential. Should BlackRock Advisors refuse to
disclose information on the basis that such information is exempt from
disclosure, BlackRock Advisors shall, by the close of the thirtieth
(30th) day following the request, provide written notice advising that
person of the reason for the refusal and that the Department may
request such information; and
(d) Promptly following any publication of a final exemption in the
Federal Register, the Trustee or BlackRock Advisors will provide a copy
of the final exemption to the Plan sponsor of each Plan invested in
RPT, and to the Plan sponsor of the Hertz Plan, and to the Plan sponsor
of the Wal-Mart Plan.
Section VI. Definitions
(a) The term Act means: The Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974, as amended;
(b) The term Affiliate means: Any person, directly or indirectly,
through one or more intermediaries, controlling, controlled by or under
common control with such person;
(c) The term BANA means: Bank of America, N.A. and its Affiliates;
(d) The term BANA Hertz Separately Managed Wrap Agreement means:
The agreement dated as of July 27, 2007 (and amended effective as of
December 31, 2008) among BANA, BlackRock Advisors (as investment
manager for a portion of the assets of the Hertz Plan), and the Bank of
New York Mellon (the successor by operation of law to Mellon Bank N.A.,
and the trustee of the trust created pursuant to the Hertz Plan), as
such agreement may be amended from time to time, pursuant to which BANA
provides a book value benefit responsive facility with respect to a
portion of the assets held in the Hertz Separately Managed Account;
(e) The term BANA RPT Buy and Hold Wrap Agreement means: The
agreement dated as of October 16, 1996, between Barclays Bank PLC and
the Trustee (as assigned to BANA as of April 1, 1998, and amended
effective as of December 31, 2008), as such agreement may be amended
from time to time, pursuant to which BANA provides a book value benefit
responsive facility with respect to an undivided portion of the assets
held in the Global Buy and Hold Account;
(f) The term BANA RPT Global Wrap Agreement means: The agreement
dated as of May 1, 2004 (and amended effective as of December 31, 2008)
between BANA and the Trustee, as such agreement may be amended from
time to time, pursuant to which BANA provides a book value benefit
responsive facility with respect to an undivided portion of the assets
held in the Global Wrap Account;
(g) The term BANA Wal-Mart Separately Managed Wrap Agreement means:
The agreement dated as of August 19, 2003 (and amended effective as of
December 31, 2008) between BANA and the Trustee, as such agreement may
be amended from time to time, pursuant to which BANA provides a book
value benefit responsive facility with respect to a portion of the
assets held in the Wal-Mart Separately Managed Account;
(h) The term Below Investment Grade Security means: Securities that
cease to be covered by a benefit responsive contract in RPT (other than
by the RPT Special Purpose Wrap Agreement) solely as a result of a
downgrade in the credit rating of the security to below Baa3, BBB- or
BBB- by Moody's Investors Services, Inc., Standard & Poor's Rating
Group, or Fitch Ratings, respectively; provided, however, that a Below
Investment Grade Security shall not include any security that is an
Impaired Security;
(i) The term BlackRock means: BlackRock, Inc.;
(j) The term BlackRock Advisors means: BlackRock Investment
Management, LLC and its Affiliates;
(k) The term Code means: The Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended;
(l) The term Crediting Rate means: The crediting rate described in
sections II and IV that is used for purposes of determining the accrued
interest to be added to the book value of an individual's account
within RPT or the Separately Managed Accounts;
(m) The term Downgraded Security means: A Below Grade Investment
Security that is held in the Type D1 Account and covered by the RPT
Special Purpose Wrap Agreement;
(n) The term Global Buy and Hold Account means: The book account or
sub-account maintained within RPT for purposes of identifying certain
assets relating to the BANA RPT Buy and Hold Wrap Agreement;
(o) The term Global Wrap Account means: The book account or sub-
account maintained within RPT for purposes of identifying certain
assets relating to the BANA RPT Global Wrap Agreement;
(p) The term Hertz Plan means: The Hertz Corporation Income Savings
Plan;
(q) The term Hertz Separately Managed Account means: The separately
managed stable value account advised by BlackRock Advisors on behalf of
the Hertz Plan;
(r) The term Impaired Security means: (i) A security with respect
to which the issuer or guarantor has failed to make one or more
payments of principal or interest (after giving effect to any
applicable grace period under the terms of such security or prescribed
by any change in law, regulation, ruling or other governmental action);
(ii) a security with respect to which the principal or interest has
become due and payable before it otherwise would have been due or
payable other than: (x) By reason of a call or other prepayment of such
security made in accordance with its terms that does not constitute a
default under such security, or (y) solely on account of any change in
law, regulation, ruling or other governmental action; (iii) a security
where the rate of interest thereon has been reset other than: (x)
Pursuant to the original terms of such security, or (y) solely on
account of any change in law, regulation, ruling or other governmental
action; or (iv) a security with respect to which the issuer becomes
insolvent or institutes or has instituted against it a proceeding
seeking a judgment of insolvency or bankruptcy or any other relief
under any bankruptcy or insolvency law or other similar law affecting
creditor's rights;
(s) The term Independent Fiduciary means an entity that is: (1)
Experienced and knowledgeable in ERISA and the transactions and
arrangements described herein; (ii) independent of and unrelated to
BANA, Merrill,
[[Page 61937]]
BlackRock, and their Affiliates; and (iii) appointed to act on behalf
of Plans investing in RPT or the Separately Managed Accounts with
respect to the matters described herein. The Independent Fiduciary will
not be deemed to be independent of and unrelated to BANA, Merrill,
BlackRock, and their Affiliates if: (i) Such fiduciary directly or
indirectly controls, is controlled by or is under common control with
BANA, Merrill, or BlackRock; (ii) such fiduciary directly or indirectly
receives any compensation or other consideration in connection with any
transaction described in this exemption, if granted, other than for
acting as an Independent Fiduciary in connection with the transactions
described herein, provided that the amount or payment of such
compensation is not contingent upon, or in any way affected by, the
Independent Fiduciary's ultimate decision; and (iii) the annual gross
revenue received by the Independent Fiduciary, during any year of its
engagement, from BANA, Merrill, BlackRock, and any of their Affiliates,
exceeds five percent (5%) of the Independent Fiduciary's annual gross
revenue from all sources (for federal income tax purposes) for its
prior tax year;
(t) The term Minimum Ratio means: A ratio of 2.5 to 1.0 of market
value of Permitted Securities to the total unamortized unrealized and
realized losses with respect to Downgraded Securities;
(u) The term Permitted Securities means any security that: (i) Is a
U.S. Treasury debenture, a security issued by the Government National
Mortgage Association or a security guaranteed by the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation; and (ii) has a modified duration on the date of
purchase by RPT of 3.5 years or less;
(v) The term Plan means: An employee benefit plan within the
meaning of and subject to Title I of the Act or an individual
retirement account within the meaning of section 4975 of the Code;
(w) The term RPT means: The Merrill Lynch Retirement Preservation
Trust maintained by the Trustee;
(x) The term RPT Special Purpose Wrap Agreement means: The
agreement dated as of April 23, 2009, as amended, between BANA and the
Trustee, pursuant to which BANA provides a book value benefit
responsive facility with respect to an undivided portion of the assets
held in the Type D1 Account;
(y) The term RPT Stable Value Agreements means: The BANA RPT Global
Wrap Agreement and the BANA RPT Buy and Hold Wrap Agreement;
(z) The term Separately Managed Accounts means: The Hertz
Separately Managed Account and the Wal-Mart Separately Managed Account;
(aa) The term Separately Managed Account Wrap Agreements means: The
BANA Wal-Mart Separately Managed Wrap Agreement and the BANA Hertz
Separately Managed Wrap Agreement;
(bb) The term Type D1 Account means: The book account maintained
within RPT for purposes of identifying Downgraded Securities, including
unamortized losses with respect to Downgraded Securities that have been
sold, and Permitted Securities covered by the RPT Special Purpose Wrap
Agreement;
(cc) The term Tier 3 Wrap Provider means: A financial institution
that has entered into a wrap agreement with respect to assets held in
the Wal-Mart Separately Managed Account that will not be accessed for
purposes of making benefit payments until after two tiers of buffer
assets are accessed;
(dd) The term Trustee means: Bank of America, N.A.;
(ee) The term Wal-Mart Plan means: The Wal-Mart Profit Sharing and
401(k) Plan and the Wal-Mart Puerto Rico Profit Sharing and 401(k)
Plan;
(ff) The term Wal-Mart Separately Managed Account means: The
separately managed stable value account advised by BlackRock Advisors
on behalf of the Wal-Mart Plan;
(gg) The term Merrill means: Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. and its
Affiliates;
(hh) The term RPT Wrap-Related Transaction means: (1) The
determination, calculation of and adjustments to the Crediting Rate,
and any changes to the Crediting Rate formula; (2) valuations of
securities covered by the BANA RPT Stable Value Agreements; (3) payment
of wrap fees and any changes to wrap fees; (4) the purchase and sale of
any security covered by the RPT Stable Value Agreements; (5) BANA's or
the Trustee's exercise of its right to immunize or terminate the RPT
Stable Value Agreements; (6) amendments to the RPT Stable Value
Agreements; and (7) any other exercise by BANA, the Trustee, or
BlackRock Advisors of their rights, or any performance by BANA, the
Trustee, or BlackRock of their obligations, under the Stable Value
Agreements;
(ii) The term Special Purpose Wrap-Related Transaction means: (1)
The transfer of Below Investment Grade Securities to the Type D1
Account; (2) the sale or transfer of Downgraded Securities out of the
Type D1 Account; (3) the purchase and sale of certain other securities
permitted to be held in the Type D1 Account; (4) transactions relating
to maintenance of a minimum ratio of Permitted Securities and
Downgraded Securities; (5) the determination, calculation of and
adjustments to the Type D1 Account Crediting Rate and any changes to
the Type D1 Account Crediting Rate formula; (6) valuations of
securities covered by the RPT Special Purpose Wrap Agreement; (7)
payment of and any changes to wrap fees; (8) BANA's or the Trustee's
exercise of its right to immunize or terminate the RPT Special Purpose
Wrap Agreement; (9) the entering into and amendment of the RPT Special
Purpose Wrap Agreement; and (10) any exercise by BANA, the Trustee, or
BlackRock Advisors of their rights, or any performance by BANA, the
Trustee, or BlackRock of their obligations, under the RPT Special
Purpose Wrap Agreement;
(jj) The term Separately Managed Account Wrap-Related Transaction
means: (1) The determination, calculation of and adjustments to the
Crediting Rate, and any changes to the Crediting Rate formula; (2)
valuations of securities covered by the Separately Managed Account Wrap
Agreements; (3) payment of wrap fees and any changes to wrap fees; (4)
the purchase and sale of any security covered by the Separately Managed
Account Wrap Agreements; (5) BANA's or the Trustee's exercise of its
right to terminate the Separately Managed Wrap Agreements; (6)
amendments to the Separately Managed Wrap Agreements; and (7) any other
exercise by BANA, the Trustee, or BlackRock Advisors of their rights,
or any performance by BANA, the Trustee, or BlackRock of their
obligations, under the Separately Managed Wrap Agreements.
Summary of Facts and Representations
1. Applicants
A. Bank of America, NA (BANA). BANA is a wholly-owned indirect
subsidiary of Bank of America Corporation (BAC). BANA is engaged in a
general consumer banking, commercial banking and trust business,
offering a wide range of commercial, corporate, international,
financial market, retail and fiduciary banking services.
B. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. (Merrill). Merrill is a holding
company that, through its affiliates, provides broker-dealer,
investment banking, financing, advisory, wealth management, insurance,
lending and related products and services. Merrill's subsidiaries
included Merrill Lynch Bank & Trust Co., FSB (MLTC). MLTC merged into
BANA during the fourth quarter of 2009.
[[Page 61938]]
C. BlackRock, Inc. (BlackRock). BlackRock is an investment
management firm that, as of December 31, 2008, had approximately $1.307
trillion in assets under management.
D. Merrill/BAC Merger. On September 15, 2008, BAC and Merrill
entered into an agreement and plan of merger pursuant to which,
effective as of the closing of the transactions contemplated thereby, a
new, wholly-owned subsidiary of BAC merged with and into Merrill (the
Merrill/BAC Merger). The Merrill/BAC Merger closed on January 1, 2009,
at which time Merrill became a wholly-owned subsidiary of BAC and an
affiliate of BANA.
E. Merrill/BlackRock Transaction. On September 29, 2006, Merrill
contributed Merrill Lynch Investment Managers, LLC and various other
assets and subsidiaries that comprised its investment management
business to BlackRock. As a result of that transaction (the Merrill/
BlackRock Transaction), from September 29, 2006, though December 26,
2008, Merrill held an approximate 49% ownership interest in BlackRock
and held 45% of the outstanding voting securities of BlackRock.
Pursuant to an exchange agreement between Merrill and BlackRock, dated
as of December 26, 2008, Merrill reduced its voting interest in
BlackRock to 4.9%. However, Merrill retained an approximate 49.5%
equity interest in BlackRock.
F. BlackRock/Barclays Acquisition. On December 1, 2009, BlackRock
acquired Barclays Global Investors. As part of this transaction,
Merrill Lynch's economic ownership of BlackRock was reduced to 34.2%.
Merrill Lynch currently has a 3.4% voting interest in BlackRock.
2. The Application
The application submitted by the Applicants includes the following:
An overview of stable value funds; a description of the Retirement
Preservation Trust (RPT) stable value fund; a request for retroactive
and prospective exemptive relief for the operation of, and certain
transactions under, two stable value wrap agreements entered into
between MLTC and BANA with respect to certain assets of the RPT; a
request for retroactive and prospective exemptive relief for the
execution and operation of, and certain transactions under, a ``special
purpose'' wrap agreement entered into between MLTC and BANA with
respect to certain assets of RPT; a request for retroactive and
prospective exemptive relief for the operation of and transactions
under two stable value wrap agreements entered into by BANA with
respect to single plan separately managed accounts advised by BlackRock
Advisers, a BlackRock affiliate, on behalf of the Hertz Plan and the
Wal-Mart Plan; and numerous representations by Fiduciary Counselors
Inc., who is currently the independent fiduciary (the Independent
Fiduciary) responsible for representing the interests of the Hertz
Plan, the Wal-Mart Plan, and employee benefit plans (Plans) investing
in RPT for purposes of the transactions described in this proposed
exemption, if granted.
Paragraphs 3-9. Applicants' Overview of Stable Value Funds
3. Stable value funds are intended as conservative investment
options that provide preservation of principal, liquidity and current
income at levels that are typically higher than those provided by money
market funds. To achieve this objective, stable value funds invest in
traditional and synthetic guaranteed investment contracts (GICs). A
traditional GIC is an investment contract that guarantees payments on
deposits at a specified rate and is typically purchased through an
insurance company. In a synthetic GIC structure, the plan or plan asset
fund retains title to an underlying portfolio of fixed income assets
and purchases a ``wrap agreement'' from a bank, insurance company or
other financial institution. Synthetic GICs permit diversification away
from the credit risk of an insurance company and provide an opportunity
to achieve higher returns through an actively managed portfolio.
4. Under the terms of standard wrap agreements, the wrap provider
agrees that payments to participants upon retirement, death,
disability, employment termination, hardship or transfer to a non-
competing investment alternative (generally referred to as ``benefit
responsive payments'') will be made based on ``book value,'' regardless
of fluctuations in the market value of the underlying portfolio of
assets. Book value generally represents the value of deposits (i.e.,
the principal amount invested) plus interest (accumulated at a
``credited rate'') minus withdrawals and minus adjustments for assets
that become impaired.\2\ This provision of book value accounting at the
participant level is the core feature of a stable value fund. However,
not all payments to participants are made at book value. For example,
withdrawals arising from a plan's decision to transfer to a competing
investment alternative, or certain actions initiated by a plan sponsor,
may be paid at market value, which could be less than book value
depending on the performance of the underlying investment portfolio.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The Applicants describe an impaired security as including a
security with respect to which the issuer or guarantor has failed to
make one or more payments of principal or interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. A wrap agreement does not guarantee that the book value of the
wrapped assets will increase by a specified rate of return. Rather,
interest is credited to the underlying portfolio based on a formula
that is designed to equal the actual total rate of return on the
underlying portfolio over time, while smoothing the gains and losses.
To achieve this smoothing, the difference between the market value of
the underlying portfolio and the book value of the underlying portfolio
is amortized through periodic adjustments to the rate at which interest
is credited to the book value of the underlying portfolio. The rate at
which interest is credited is determined by means of a formula (the
crediting rate formula) which takes into account the yield to maturity
and the duration of the underlying portfolio as well as the ratio of
the market value of the underlying portfolio to the book value.
6. Stable value funds generally include: (1) a liquidity fund that
may or may not be covered by a wrap agreement; and (2) multiple
portfolios of assets, each covered by a different wrap agreement. The
wrap agreements include rules establishing the priority for obtaining
cash for withdrawals from the assets included in the stable value fund.
Generally, these rules require that withdrawals be first met from new
cash and then from the liquidity fund. Once these sources are
exhausted, withdrawals are funded by selling securities in wrapped
portfolios. Thus, for example, in the event there are significant
participant withdrawals during a bond-market downturn (an environment
in which there could be a significant difference between the wrap
contract book value and the market value of the wrapped assets) the
stable value fund would first access liquid assets in the fund in an
attempt to make book value payments. Once those are exhausted, wrapped
assets would be sold in a pre-specified order to provide liquidity
needed to make book value payments. If all of the assets covered by a
particular wrap contract were sold, and if the proceeds were
insufficient to meet the book value payment, the wrap provider would
pay the difference between the sale proceeds and the book value under
the wrap contract before securities in the next lower tier would be
sold to fund withdrawals.
7. Wrap agreements can generally be terminated by either party
(i.e., the
[[Page 61939]]
trustee of the stable value fund or the wrap provider) at market value.
However, most wrap agreements have immunization provisions whereby if
the wrap agreement is terminated: (1) More conservative investment
guidelines (i.e., more conservative than the guidelines in effect
before the immunization) will apply to the underlying portfolio; and
(2) the wrap provider will continue to provide book value coverage
until a date that is generally determined by reference to the
underlying portfolio. If wrap contracts were terminable by the wrap
provider on short notice at a time when the market value of the wrapped
assets was below the wrapped contract book value, and another wrap
provider could not be found as a substitute, the unwrapped assets would
be immediately revalued down to their fair market value. Immunization
is a ``middle ground,'' and provides a means of winding down and
terminating a contract that otherwise would be ``evergreen.''
Immunization effectively permits an open-ended contract to be converted
to a contract with a deferred termination date. During the immunization
period, the wrapped contract continues to be ``benefit responsive'' and
investors continue to receive payments at book value.
8. Fees for wrap agreements are generally based on a percentage of
the book value of assets covered by a wrap agreement. The fee is
frequently paid from the assets of the Plan or Plan asset fund. The
amount of the fee will vary depending upon the risk taken and the
market conditions when the wrap agreement is negotiated. Since book
value payments generally could occur when investments are moved to
another non-competing investment option, when retirees or other
inactive participants withdraw money from a plan and when participants
take in-service withdrawals, book value payments are neither
predictable nor controllable by the wrap provider. Notwithstanding that
wrap contracts are structured in a manner that is intended to mitigate
the risk of higher than expected or untimely participant withdrawals,
the risk remains greater than zero. Fees for wrap agreements would be
significantly higher if the wrap provider guaranteed the actual
performance of the assets wrapped in circumstances beyond those
described above.
9. In the current distressed economic climate, the number of
financial institutions that are willing to enter into wrap agreements
has declined. To the extent wrap coverage can be obtained, the fees for
providing such coverage have significantly increased from the fees
generally available during the past ten years.
Paragraphs 10-22. Applicants' Description of RPT
10. RPT is a ``stable value'' fund with approximately $11.7 billion
book value of assets as of December 31, 2008. Payments to participants
(or beneficiaries) upon retirement, death, disability, employment
termination, hardship or transfer to a non-competing investment
alternative are generally based on book value, such that a participant
in RPT will receive his invested principal and interest at a crediting
rate, as described in further detail below, even if the actual market
value of the underlying assets is less.
11. Bank of America, N.A. (hereinafter, either BANA or the Trustee)
is the trustee of RPT. BlackRock Advisers, a wholly-owned subsidiary of
BlackRock, is an investment adviser to RPT. The assets of RPT are
divided into several portfolios, which include an actively managed
portfolio with approximately $2.8 billion book value of assets (the
Actively Managed Account) and a buy and hold portfolio with
approximately $1.6 billion book value of assets (the Global Buy and
Hold Account).
12. In connection with the operation of RPT, the Trustee has
entered into stable value wrap agreements with banks and other
financial institutions to provide benefit responsive facilities with
respect to certain assets of RPT. BANA is one of several financial
institutions that have entered into stable value wrap agreements with
the Trustee under RPT. In this regard, prior to the Merrill/BAC Merger,
BANA had entered into two separate wrap agreements with the Trustee
under RPT. One agreement, dated May 1, 2004, provides a benefit
responsive facility with respect to the Actively Managed Account (the
BANA RPT Global Wrap Agreement). The other agreement, dated October 16,
1996 (assigned by Barclays Bank PLC to BANA effective April 1, 1998,
and amended effective as of December 31, 2008), provides a benefit
responsive facility with respect to the Global Buy and Hold Account
(the BANA RPT Buy and Hold Wrap Agreement).
13. The BANA RPT Global Wrap Agreement is one of four wrap
agreements covering assets in a global wrap account (the Global Wrap
Account). The Global Wrap Account represents approximately 24% of the
total book value of the assets of RPT. The assets in the Global Wrap
Account are actively managed. Under this wrap agreement, which RPT and
BANA entered into prior to the Merrill/BAC Merger, BANA provide benefit
responsive coverage for approximately 27% of the book value of the
assets credited to the Global Wrap Account. Banks and financial
institutions unaffiliated with BANA have entered into wrap agreements
with the Trustee providing coverage for approximately 73% of the book
value of the assets in the Global Wrap Account. The assets in the
Global Wrap Account covered by the BANA RPT Global Wrap Agreement are
not segregated from the assets in the Global Wrap Account covered by
the other wrap agreements. Each wrap agreement covers a specified
percentage of the book value of the assets in the Global Wrap Account
as a whole. In this regard, the BANA RPT Global Wrap Agreement provides
a benefit responsive wrap with respect to approximately 5.5% of the
total book value of the assets of RPT.
14. Under the BANA RPT Buy and Hold Wrap Agreement, prior to
December 31, 2008, BANA provided a benefit responsive facility with
respect to a segregated ``buy and hold'' portfolio of assets of RPT,
with no other wrap provider providing a benefit responsive facility
with respect to this portfolio. Effective as of December 31, 2008, the
Applicants amended the BANA RPT Buy and Hold Wrap Agreement in a manner
that: (a) Combined the ``buy and hold'' portfolio covered by the BANA
RPT Buy and Hold Wrap Agreement with a portfolio of assets of RPT
covered by a ``buy and hold'' benefit responsive wrap agreement between
the Trustee and another unaffiliated wrap provider (Global Buy and Hold
Wrap Provider 2) to form the Global Buy and Hold Account; and (b)
provides that BANA will provide coverage for 50% of the book value of
the assets held in the Global Buy and Hold Account. Global Buy and Hold
Wrap Provider 2's wrap agreement with the Trustee was amended similarly
to provide that it will provide coverage for 50% of the book value of
the assets held in the Global Buy and Hold Account. As is the case with
the BANA RPT Global Wrap Agreement, the assets in the Global Buy and
Hold Account covered by the BANA RPT Buy and Hold Wrap Agreement are
not segregated from the assets in the Global Buy and Hold Account
covered by the other wrap agreement. Each wrap agreement covers a
specified percentage of the book value of the assets in the Global Buy
and Hold Account as a whole. The Global Buy and Hold Account as a whole
represents approximately 13.6% of the book value of the assets of RPT,
and the BANA RPT Buy and Hold Wrap Agreement
[[Page 61940]]
provides a benefit responsive wrap with respect to approximately 6.8%
of the total book value of the assets of RPT.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The Applicants represent that the conversion of the BANA RPT
Buy and Hold Wrap Agreement into a ``global'' arrangement will not
affect the Crediting Rate (referenced above and described in further
detail below) applicable to a participant's account in RPT. In this
regard, the Applicants state that the conversion involved a purely
internal adjustment, based upon an objective mathematical formula,
among BANA and the other wrap provider to reflect the different
market to book ratios of assets wrapped by BANA and Global Buy and
Hold Wrap Provider 2 at the time of conversion into the Global Buy
and Hold Account. The Applicants represent that this adjustment is
relevant only if the wrap contracts must be accessed to make benefit
responsive payments and will have no effect on the participants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
15. The BANA RPT Global Wrap Agreement and the BANA RPT Buy and
Hold Wrap Agreement (the RPT Stable Value Agreements) provide for
``buffer'' assets that would be liquidated to fund withdrawals from RPT
before the assets held under the Global Wrap Account or the Global Buy
and Hold Account are used to fund withdrawals. Under the RPT Stable
Value Agreements, liquidity requirements for withdrawals would be
satisfied in the following order:
(1) Netting withdrawals from deposits whenever possible;
(2) Simple interest payments and maturing proceeds;
(3) Type ``A'' assets which include money market and other
short-term investments as well as any short-term benefit responsive
floaters;
(4) Type ``B'' buffer contracts, which will generally be
accessed on a pro rata basis;
(5) Level ``C'' contracts on a pro rata basis; and
(6) Level ``D'' contracts.
The RPT Stable Value Agreements cover Level C assets which, subject to
a limited temporary exception for certain Plan level withdrawals from
RPT, will not be accessed until assets in a higher category have all
been accessed.\4\ A minimum of 8% of RPT's assets must be held as Type
A and Type B combined. As of June 10, 2009, Type A and Type B assets
accounted for approximately 13% of the assets of RPT. These ``buffer''
assets significantly reduce the likelihood that payments will be
triggered for any of the wrap providers that wrap assets in the Global
Wrap Account or the Global Buy and Hold Account.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The Applicants represent that, to address liquidity concerns
under RPT, the wrap providers covering assets in RPT have agreed to
permit the Trustee and BlackRock Advisers to sell a vertical slice
of securities held in RPT, other than securities covered by the
Special Purpose Wrap Agreement (discussed below), to fund certain
Plan-level withdrawals. In this regard, BAC will provide direct
capital contributions to fund the difference between the market
value and the book value of the assets attributable to the
withdrawing Plans in an amount of up to $175 million. BAC's
commitment to provide liquidity will be in effect for a maximum
period of two years.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
16. The BANA RPT Stable Value Agreements effectively function to
protect Plans that invest in RPT if there are significant withdrawals
during negative market conditions. RPT has been structured with the
expectation that RPT liquidity requirements can be satisfied without
resort to the assets covered by the wrap contracts. Since RPT was
established in 1989, the Trustee has never been required to access the
wrap contracts. Eligible investments made by RPT are generally
conservative and the buffer assets reduce the likelihood that a payment
would need to be made under a wrap contract.\5\ Each of the RPT Stable
Value Agreements also has strict investment guidelines regarding the
investments that can be held under those contracts. Only in the event
that there are substantial withdrawals from RPT at a time when the
assets of RPT are significantly underperforming would there be any risk
that the assets covered by the wrap contracts would need to be
liquidated to satisfy withdrawals and a payment from a wrap provider
would be required. Moreover, in the current distressed economic
environment, participants in employee benefit plans have generally
moved assets into conservative investments, such as stable value funds.
RPT had a net inflow (i.e., contributions in excess of withdrawals) of
approximately $300 million during the fourth quarter of 2008.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The Department has not considered the issue, and is
expressing no opinion herein, regarding whether RPT assets have been
invested on a conservative basis or in a manner consistent with RPT
guidelines.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
17. The crediting rate under a wrap agreement is the rate of
interest that is used for purposes of determining the accrued interest
to be added to the book value of the assets covered by the agreement.
Under either RPT Stable Value Agreement, such crediting rate (the
Crediting Rate) was set at the inception of the wrap agreement by
agreement betw