Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From Malaysia: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 61128-61130 [2010-24837]
Download as PDF
61128
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 191 / Monday, October 4, 2010 / Notices
Period of Review
The period of review (POR) is January
30, 2008, through April 30, 2009.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to this order
is certain welded carbon quality light–
walled steel pipe and tube, of
rectangular (including square) cross
section, having a wall thickness of less
than 4 mm. The term carbon–quality
steel includes both carbon steel and
alloy steel which contains only small
amounts of alloying elements.
Specifically, the term carbon–quality
includes products in which none of the
elements listed below exceeds the
quantity by weight respectively
indicated: 1.80 percent of manganese, or
2.25 percent of silicon, or 1.00 percent
of copper, or 0.50 percent of aluminum,
or 1.25 percent of chromium, or 0.30
percent of cobalt, or 0.40 percent of
lead, or 1.25 percent of nickel, or 0.30
percent of tungsten, or 0.10 percent of
molybdenum, or 0.10 percent of
niobium, or 0.15 percent vanadium, or
0.15 percent of zirconium. The
description of carbon–quality is
intended to identify carbon–quality
products within the scope. The welded
carbon–quality rectangular pipe and
tube subject to this order is currently
classified under the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
subheadings 7306.61.50.00 and
7306.61.70.60. While HTSUS
subheadings are provided for
convenience and CBP’s customs
purposes, our written description of the
scope of the order is dispositive.
Final Results of Review
The Department has determined that
the following margins exist for the
period January 30, 2008, through April
30, 2009:
Manufacturer
Weighted Average
Margin (percentage)
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Toscelik Profil Ve Sac
¸
Endustrisi A.S ...........
0.00%
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to these final results, the
Department has determined, and CBP
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries. The Department
intends to issue assessment instructions
for Toscelik to CBP 15 days after the
date of publication of these final results.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), we
calculated importer–specific (or
customer–specific) ad valorem duty
assessment rates based on the ratio of
the total amount of the dumping
margins calculated for the examined
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:22 Oct 01, 2010
Jkt 223001
sales to the total entered value of those
same sales. We will instruct CBP to
assess antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries covered by this
review if any importer–specific (or
customer–specific) assessment rate
calculated in the final results of this
review are above de minimis.
The Department clarified its
‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on
May 6, 2003. See Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (Assessment of
Antidumping Duties). This clarification
will apply to entries of subject
merchandise during the POR produced
by Toscelik for which Toscelik did not
¸
¸
know the merchandise was destined for
the United States. In such instances, we
will instruct CBP to liquidate un–
reviewed entries at the 27.04 percent
all–others rate from the LTFV
investigation if there is no company–
specific rate for an intermediary
involved in the transaction. See Notice
of Antidumping Duty Order: Light–
Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube
From Turkey, 73 FR 31065 (May 30,
2008). See Assessment of Antidumping
Duties for a full discussion of this
clarification.
Cash Deposit Requirements
Furthermore, the following deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of these final results for all
shipments of light–walled rectangular
pipe and tube from Turkey entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication
date of the final results of this
administrative review, as provided by
section 751(a)(1) of the Tariff Act: 1) the
cash deposit rate for Toscelik Profil Ve
Sac Endustrisi A.S. will be the rate
established in the final results of review;
2) if the exporter is not a firm covered
in this review or the less–than-fair–
value (LTFV) investigation, but the
manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate
will be the rate established for the most
recent period for the manufacturer of
the merchandise; and 3) if neither the
exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm
covered in this or any previous review
conducted by the Department, the cash
deposit rate will be the all–others rate
from the LTFV investigation. Id. These
deposit requirements, when imposed,
shall remain in effect until further
notice.
Reimbursement of Duties
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)
to file a certificate regarding the
reimbursement of antidumping duties
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
prior to liquidation of the relevant
entries during this POR. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in the Secretary’s presumption
that reimbursement of antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of doubled antidumping
duties.
Administrative Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective orders (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and terms of an APO is a violation
which is subject to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing this
notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Tariff Act.
Dated: September 27, 2010.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010–24831 Filed 10–1–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–557–813]
Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From
Malaysia: Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On June 15, 2010, the
Department published its preliminary
results of the administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on
polyethylene retail carrier bags (PRCBs)
from Malaysia. The review covers one
manufacturer/exporter. The period of
review is August 1, 2008, through July
31, 2009.
We gave interested parties an
opportunity to comment on the
preliminary results. We have made no
changes to the margin calculation for
the final results of this review. The final
weighted-average margin is listed below
in the ‘‘Final Results of the Review’’
section of this notice.
DATES: Effective Date: October 4, 2010.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\04OCN1.SGM
04OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 191 / Monday, October 4, 2010 / Notices
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jerrold Freeman or Yang Chun, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 5, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–0180 or (202) 482–
5760, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Background
On June 15, 2010, the Department
published the preliminary results of
review and invited parties to comment.
See Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags
From Malaysia: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, 75 FR 33772 (June 15, 2010)
(Preliminary Results). Although we
received comments from interested
parties, those comments are no longer
on the record of the review. See ‘‘Return
of Comments’’ section below.
We have conducted this review in
accordance with section 751(a) of the
Tariff Act, as amended (the Act).
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the
antidumping duty order is PRCBs which
may be referred to as t-shirt sacks,
merchandise bags, grocery bags, or
checkout bags. The subject merchandise
is defined as non-sealable sacks and
bags with handles (including
drawstrings), without zippers or integral
extruded closures, with or without
gussets, with or without printing, of
polyethylene film having a thickness no
greater than 0.035 inch (0.889 mm) and
no less than 0.00035 inch (0.00889 mm),
and with no length or width shorter
than 6 inches (15.24 cm) or longer than
40 inches (101.6 cm). The depth of the
bag may be shorter than 6 inches (15.24
cm) but not longer than 40 inches (101.6
cm).
PRCBs are typically provided without
any consumer packaging and free of
charge by retail establishments, e.g.,
grocery, drug, convenience, department,
specialty retail, discount stores, and
restaurants, to their customers to
package and carry their purchased
products. The scope of the order
excludes (1) polyethylene bags that are
not printed with logos or store names
and that are closeable with drawstrings
made of polyethylene film and (2)
polyethylene bags that are packed in
consumer packaging with printing that
refers to specific end-uses other than
packaging and carrying merchandise
from retail establishments, e.g., garbage
bags, lawn bags, trash-can liners.
Imports of the subject merchandise
are currently classifiable under
statistical category 3923.21.0085 of the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:23 Oct 01, 2010
Jkt 223001
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS). This
subheading also covers products that are
outside the scope of the order.
Furthermore, although the HTSUS
subheading is provided for convenience
and customs purposes, the written
description of the scope of the order is
dispositive.
Return of Comments
On July 15, 2010, Target Corporation
(Target), an importer of subject
merchandise, filed a case brief. On July
16, 2010, Target filed a correction letter
with respect to its July 15, 2010, case
brief. On July 20, 2010, the petitioners 1
filed a rebuttal brief.
On August 4, 2010, we returned the
July 15, 2010, case brief and July 16,
2010, correction letter to Target in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.302(d) (see
August 4, 2010, letter to Target). In our
letter to Target, we stated that its case
brief contained unsolicited and
untimely new factual information and
that we will not rely on the new factual
information in the case brief and
correction letter in making our final
determination. See 19 CFR
351.104(a)(2). Accordingly, we provided
Target an opportunity to refile its case
brief omitting the new factual
information. The deadline for Target to
resubmit its case brief was August 10,
2010.
On August 5, 2010, we returned the
July 20, 2010, rebuttal brief to the
petitioners because in it they had
referred to the new factual information
Target raised improperly in its case brief
and correction letter (see August 5,
2010, letter to the petitioners). In our
letter, we provided the petitioners an
opportunity to refile their rebuttal brief
omitting the new factual information.
The deadline for the petitioners to
resubmit their rebuttal brief was August
11, 2010.
Target did not submit a revised case
brief by the August 10 deadline. The
petitioners did not submit a revised
rebuttal brief by the August 11 deadline.
See Memorandum to the File dated
August 19, 2010.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Because the interested parties in this
administrative review did not refile
their respective case or rebuttal briefs,
there are no comments to address
concerning the Department’s
determination in the Preliminary
Results. Therefore, we have made no
changes to our determination to apply
1 The Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bag Committee
and its individual members, Hilex Poly Co., LLC,
and Superbag Corporation.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
61129
adverse facts available, as discussed in
the Preliminary Results (75 FR at
33773–74), to Euro Plastics Malaysia
Sdn. Bhd. (Euro Plastics).
Final Results of the Review
As a result of our review, we
determine that a weighted-average
dumping margin of 101.74 percent
exists for Euro Plastics for the period
August 1, 2008, through July 31, 2009.
Assessment Rates
Because we are relying on total
adverse facts available to establish the
dumping margin for Euro Plastics, we
will instruct U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) to apply a dumping
margin of 101.74 percent to all entries
of PRCBs from Malaysia that were
produced and/or exported by Euro
Plastics and entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption during the
period of review.
The Department intends to issue
appropriate assessment instructions to
CBP 15 days after publication of these
final results of review.
Cash-Deposit Requirements
The following cash-deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of this notice of final results
of administrative review for all
shipments of PRCBs from Malaysia
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the date of
publication, as provided by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cashdeposit rate for Euro Plastics will be
101.74 percent; (2) for other previously
reviewed or investigated companies, the
cash-deposit rate will continue to be the
company-specific rate published for the
most recent period; (3) if the exporter is
not a firm covered in this review, a prior
review, or the less-than-fair-value
investigation but the manufacturer is,
the cash-deposit rate will be the rate
established for the most recent period
for the manufacturer of the
merchandise; (4) if neither the exporter
nor the manufacturer has its own rate,
the cash-deposit rate will be 84.94
percent, the all-others rate established
in the Notice of Final Determination of
Sales at Less Than Fair Value:
Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From
Malaysia, 69 FR 34128 (June 18, 2004).
These deposit requirements shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)
to file a certificate regarding the
reimbursement of antidumping duties
prior to liquidation of the relevant
E:\FR\FM\04OCN1.SGM
04OCN1
61130
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 191 / Monday, October 4, 2010 / Notices
entries during the period of review.
Failure to comply with this requirement
could result in the Department’s
presumption that reimbursement of
antidumping duties occurred and the
subsequent assessment of doubled
antidumping duties. See 19 CFR
351.402(f)(3).
Notification Regarding APO
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to the administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO as explained in
the APO itself. See also 19 CFR
351.305(a)(3). Timely written
notification of the destruction of APO
materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and terms of an APO is a sanctionable
violation.
We are publishing these final results
of administrative review and notice in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.221(b)(5).
Dated: September 27, 2010.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010–24837 Filed 10–1–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–831]
Fresh Garlic From the People’s
Republic of China: Final Results of
New Shipper Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Department) is conducting a new
shipper review (NSR) of Qingdao Sealine Trading Co. Ltd. (Qingdao Sea-line)
under the antidumping duty order on
fresh garlic from the People’s Republic
of China (PRC) covering the period of
review (POR) of November 1, 2008
through April 30, 2009. As discussed
below, we determine that a sale has
been made in the United States at a
price below normal value (NV) with
respect to Qingdao Sea-line, an exporter
who participated fully and
demonstrated its eligibility for separate
rate. See Fresh Garlic From the People’s
Republic of China: Preliminary Results
of New Shipper Review, 75 FR 24578
(May 5, 2010) (Preliminary Results). We
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:23 Oct 01, 2010
Jkt 223001
are continuing to find Qingdao Sealine’s sale to be bona fide for the final
results of this review. We intend to
instruct U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) to assess antidumping
duties on entries of subject merchandise
during the POR for which importerspecific assessment rates are above de
minimis.
DATES:
Effective Date: October 4, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Scott Lindsay, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 6, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–0780.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On May 5, 2010, the Department
published in the Federal Register the
preliminary results of the NSR of the
antidumping duty order on fresh garlic
from the PRC. See Preliminary Results.
Since the Preliminary Results, the
following events have occurred.
On May 21, 2010, the Department
extended the deadline for filing case
briefs. See Letter from the Department to
All Interested Parties (May 21, 2010).
On July 19, 2010, Qingdao Sea-line
submitted a document on the record of
this review that contained new factual
information within the meaning of 19
CFR 351.301(b)(4) and 19 CFR 351.301
(c)(1). As a result, on July 23, 2010, the
Department issued a letter to Qingdao
Sea-line rejecting its July 19, 2010
submission. Also on July 23, 2010, the
Department notified the parties of the
briefing schedule for the final results.
See Memorandum to the File,
Antidumping Duty New Shipper
Review of Fresh Garlic From the
People’s Republic of China: Briefing
Schedule (July 23, 2010). On August 6,
2010, Qingdao Sea-line timely
submitted its case brief and requested a
hearing. On August 16, 2010,
Petitioners 1 timely submitted their
rebuttal brief.
On August 27, 2010, the Department
placed on the record a memorandum
indicating that, pursuant to a telephone
discussion, Qingdao Sea-line was
withdrawing its request for a hearing.
See Memorandum to the File,
Antidumping Duty New Shipper
Review of Fresh Garlic From the
People’s Republic of China: Canceled
Hearing Request (August 27, 2010).
1 The Fresh Garlic Producers Association:
Christopher Ranch L.L.C., the Garlic Company,
Valley Garlic, and Vessey and Company, Inc.
(collectively, Petitioners).
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
On September 3, 2010, as a result of
the recent decision issued by the Court
of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s
(CAFC) ruling in Dorbest Limited et al.
v. United States, 604 F.3d 1363 (Fed.
Cir. 2010) (Dorbest), the Department
placed a memorandum on the record
regarding its reconsideration of its
valuation of the labor wage rate for this
review. The Department gave interested
parties until September 15, 2010 to
comment specifically to the proposed
labor wage rate methodology. See
Memorandum to the File, Fresh Garlic
from the People’s Republic of China:
Wage Rate Data (September 3, 2010).
The Department received no comments.
Scope of the Order
The products covered by this Order
are all grades of garlic, whole or
separated into constituent cloves,
whether or not peeled, fresh, chilled,
frozen, provisionally preserved, or
packed in water or other neutral
substance, but not prepared or
preserved by the addition of other
ingredients or heat processing. The
differences between grades are based on
color, size, sheathing, and level of
decay. The scope of this order does not
include the following: (a) Garlic that has
been mechanically harvested and that is
primarily, but not exclusively, destined
for non-fresh use; or (b) garlic that has
been specially prepared and cultivated
prior to planting and then harvested and
otherwise prepared for use as seed. The
subject merchandise is used principally
as a food product and for seasoning. The
subject garlic is currently classifiable
under subheadings 0703.20.0010,
0703.20.0020, 0703.20.0090,
0710.80.7060, 0710.80.9750,
0711.90.6000, and 2005.90.9700 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS). Although the
HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, our
written description of the scope of this
order is dispositive. In order to be
excluded from the Order, garlic entered
under the HTSUS subheadings listed
above that is (1) mechanically harvested
and primarily, but not exclusively,
destined for non-fresh use or
(2) specially prepared and cultivated
prior to planting and then harvested and
otherwise prepared for use as seed must
be accompanied by declarations to CBP
to that effect.
Analysis of Comments Received
Issues raised in the case and rebuttal
briefs by parties to this proceeding and
to which we have responded are listed
in the Appendix to this notice and
addressed in the Memorandum from
Susan Kuhbach, Acting Deputy
E:\FR\FM\04OCN1.SGM
04OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 191 (Monday, October 4, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61128-61130]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24837]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-557-813]
Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From Malaysia: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On June 15, 2010, the Department published its preliminary
results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on
polyethylene retail carrier bags (PRCBs) from Malaysia. The review
covers one manufacturer/exporter. The period of review is August 1,
2008, through July 31, 2009.
We gave interested parties an opportunity to comment on the
preliminary results. We have made no changes to the margin calculation
for the final results of this review. The final weighted-average margin
is listed below in the ``Final Results of the Review'' section of this
notice.
DATES: Effective Date: October 4, 2010.
[[Page 61129]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerrold Freeman or Yang Chun, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 5, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
0180 or (202) 482-5760, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 15, 2010, the Department published the preliminary results
of review and invited parties to comment. See Polyethylene Retail
Carrier Bags From Malaysia: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 75 FR 33772 (June 15, 2010) (Preliminary
Results). Although we received comments from interested parties, those
comments are no longer on the record of the review. See ``Return of
Comments'' section below.
We have conducted this review in accordance with section 751(a) of
the Tariff Act, as amended (the Act).
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the antidumping duty order is PRCBs
which may be referred to as t-shirt sacks, merchandise bags, grocery
bags, or checkout bags. The subject merchandise is defined as non-
sealable sacks and bags with handles (including drawstrings), without
zippers or integral extruded closures, with or without gussets, with or
without printing, of polyethylene film having a thickness no greater
than 0.035 inch (0.889 mm) and no less than 0.00035 inch (0.00889 mm),
and with no length or width shorter than 6 inches (15.24 cm) or longer
than 40 inches (101.6 cm). The depth of the bag may be shorter than 6
inches (15.24 cm) but not longer than 40 inches (101.6 cm).
PRCBs are typically provided without any consumer packaging and
free of charge by retail establishments, e.g., grocery, drug,
convenience, department, specialty retail, discount stores, and
restaurants, to their customers to package and carry their purchased
products. The scope of the order excludes (1) polyethylene bags that
are not printed with logos or store names and that are closeable with
drawstrings made of polyethylene film and (2) polyethylene bags that
are packed in consumer packaging with printing that refers to specific
end-uses other than packaging and carrying merchandise from retail
establishments, e.g., garbage bags, lawn bags, trash-can liners.
Imports of the subject merchandise are currently classifiable under
statistical category 3923.21.0085 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of
the United States (HTSUS). This subheading also covers products that
are outside the scope of the order. Furthermore, although the HTSUS
subheading is provided for convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the scope of the order is dispositive.
Return of Comments
On July 15, 2010, Target Corporation (Target), an importer of
subject merchandise, filed a case brief. On July 16, 2010, Target filed
a correction letter with respect to its July 15, 2010, case brief. On
July 20, 2010, the petitioners \1\ filed a rebuttal brief.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bag Committee and its
individual members, Hilex Poly Co., LLC, and Superbag Corporation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On August 4, 2010, we returned the July 15, 2010, case brief and
July 16, 2010, correction letter to Target in accordance with 19 CFR
351.302(d) (see August 4, 2010, letter to Target). In our letter to
Target, we stated that its case brief contained unsolicited and
untimely new factual information and that we will not rely on the new
factual information in the case brief and correction letter in making
our final determination. See 19 CFR 351.104(a)(2). Accordingly, we
provided Target an opportunity to refile its case brief omitting the
new factual information. The deadline for Target to resubmit its case
brief was August 10, 2010.
On August 5, 2010, we returned the July 20, 2010, rebuttal brief to
the petitioners because in it they had referred to the new factual
information Target raised improperly in its case brief and correction
letter (see August 5, 2010, letter to the petitioners). In our letter,
we provided the petitioners an opportunity to refile their rebuttal
brief omitting the new factual information. The deadline for the
petitioners to resubmit their rebuttal brief was August 11, 2010.
Target did not submit a revised case brief by the August 10
deadline. The petitioners did not submit a revised rebuttal brief by
the August 11 deadline. See Memorandum to the File dated August 19,
2010.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Because the interested parties in this administrative review did
not refile their respective case or rebuttal briefs, there are no
comments to address concerning the Department's determination in the
Preliminary Results. Therefore, we have made no changes to our
determination to apply adverse facts available, as discussed in the
Preliminary Results (75 FR at 33773-74), to Euro Plastics Malaysia Sdn.
Bhd. (Euro Plastics).
Final Results of the Review
As a result of our review, we determine that a weighted-average
dumping margin of 101.74 percent exists for Euro Plastics for the
period August 1, 2008, through July 31, 2009.
Assessment Rates
Because we are relying on total adverse facts available to
establish the dumping margin for Euro Plastics, we will instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to apply a dumping margin of 101.74
percent to all entries of PRCBs from Malaysia that were produced and/or
exported by Euro Plastics and entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption during the period of review.
The Department intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions
to CBP 15 days after publication of these final results of review.
Cash-Deposit Requirements
The following cash-deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of this notice of final results of administrative review
for all shipments of PRCBs from Malaysia entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication, as
provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash-deposit rate
for Euro Plastics will be 101.74 percent; (2) for other previously
reviewed or investigated companies, the cash-deposit rate will continue
to be the company-specific rate published for the most recent period;
(3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior
review, or the less-than-fair-value investigation but the manufacturer
is, the cash-deposit rate will be the rate established for the most
recent period for the manufacturer of the merchandise; (4) if neither
the exporter nor the manufacturer has its own rate, the cash-deposit
rate will be 84.94 percent, the all-others rate established in the
Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value:
Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From Malaysia, 69 FR 34128 (June 18,
2004). These deposit requirements shall remain in effect until further
notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding
the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant
[[Page 61130]]
entries during the period of review. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in the Department's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of doubled antidumping duties. See 19 CFR 351.402(f)(3).
Notification Regarding APO
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to the
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO as explained in the APO itself. See also 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3).
Timely written notification of the destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable
violation.
We are publishing these final results of administrative review and
notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).
Dated: September 27, 2010.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-24837 Filed 10-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P