Rules of Adjudication and Enforcement, 60671-60674 [2010-24563]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 190 / Friday, October 1, 2010 / Proposed Rules
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
Hawker Beechcraft Corporation (Type
Certificate Previously Held by Raytheon
Aircraft Company; Beech Aircraft
Corporation): Docket No. FAA–2010–
0954; Directorate Identifier 2010–NM–
078–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by
November 15, 2010.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Hawker Beechcraft
Corporation (Type Certificate previously held
by Raytheon Aircraft Company; Beech
Aircraft Corporation), certificated in any
category; as identified in paragraphs (c)(1)
and (c)(2) of this AD.
(1) Model 400A airplanes having serial
numbers RK–337 through RK–484, RK–486
through RK–570 inclusive, RK–572, RK–573,
and RK–575 through RK–577 inclusive.
(2) Model 400T airplane having serial
number TX–13.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 54: Nacelles/Pylons.
Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a
detailed inspection is: ‘‘An intensive
examination of a specific item, installation,
or assembly to detect damage, failure, or
irregularity. Available lighting is normally
supplemented with a direct source of good
lighting at an intensity deemed appropriate.
Inspection aids such as mirror, magnifying
lenses, etc., may be necessary. Surface
cleaning and elaborate procedures may be
required.’’
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(h)(1) The Manager, Wichita Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN:
Thomas Teplik, Aerospace Engineer, Systems
and Propulsion Branch, ACE–116W, FAA,
Wichita Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
1801 Airport Road, Room 100, Mid-Continent
Airport, Wichita, Kansas 67209; telephone
(316) 946–4196; fax (316) 946–4107.
(2) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your principal maintenance inspector
(PMI) or principal avionics inspector (PAI),
as appropriate, or lacking a principal
inspector, your local Flight Standards District
Office. The AMOC approval letter must
specifically reference this AD.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
September 23, 2010.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–24714 Filed 9–30–10; 8:45 am]
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Unsafe Condition
(e) This AD results from reports of missing
sealant on the left and right pylon firewall
structures. The Federal Aviation
Administration is issuing this AD to detect
and correct missing sealant on the left and
right pylon firewall structures, which, in the
event of an engine fire, could result in flames
penetrating the seams in the firewall between
the engine and the aft fuselage, and a
subsequent uncontrolled fire in the aft
fuselage.
AGENCY:
Inspection and Corrective Action
(g) Within 200 flight hours or 12 months
after the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs first: Do a detailed inspection for
appropriate coverage of firewall sealant of the
left and right pylon firewall structure, as
specified in the figures of Hawker Beechcraft
Mandatory Service Bulletin SB 54–3946,
Revision 2, dated February 2010, and all
applicable corrective actions; in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Hawker Beechcraft Mandatory Service
Bulletin SB 54–3946, Revision 2, dated
February 2010. Do all applicable corrective
actions before further flight.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:54 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 223001
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
19 CFR Part 210
Rules of Adjudication and
Enforcement
International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
The United States
International Trade Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) proposes to amend its
Rules of Practice and Procedure
concerning rules of general application,
adjudication, and enforcement. The
amendments are necessary to gather
more information on public interest
issues arising from complaints filed
with the Commission requesting
institution of an investigation under
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337. The intended
effect of the proposed amendments is to
aid the Commission in identifying
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
60671
investigations that require further
development of public interest issues in
the record, and to identify and develop
information regarding the public
interest at each stage of the
investigation.
To be assured of consideration,
written comments must be received by
5:15 p.m. on November 30, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number MISC–032,
by any of the following methods:
—Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
—Agency Web Site: https://
www.usitc.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments
on the web site at https://
www.usitc.gov/secretary/edis.htm.
—E-mail: james.worth@usitc.gov.
Include docket number MISC–032 in
the subject line of the message.
—Mail: For paper submission. U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500
E Street, SW., Room 112, Washington,
DC 20436.
—Hand Delivery/Courier: U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500
E Street, SW., Room 112, Washington,
DC 20436. From the hours of 8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number (MISC–032), along with
a cover letter stating the nature of the
commenter’s interest in the proposed
rulemaking. All comments received will
be posted without change to https://
www.usitc.gov, including any personal
information provided. For paper copies,
a signed original and 14 copies of each
set of comments should be submitted to
Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC
20436.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.usitc.gov and/or the U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC
20436.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James Worth, telephone 202–205–3065,
or Megan Valentine, telephone, 202–
708–2301, Office of the General
Counsel, United States International
Trade Commission. Hearing-impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal at 202–205–1810. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\01OCP1.SGM
01OCP1
60672
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 190 / Friday, October 1, 2010 / Proposed Rules
The
preamble below is designed to assist
readers in understanding these
proposed amendments to the
Commission Rules. This preamble
provides background information, a
regulatory analysis of the proposed
amendments, a section-by-section
explanation of the proposed
amendments to part 210, and a
description of the proposed
amendments to the rules. The
Commission encourages members of the
public to comment, in addition to any
other comments they wish to make on
the proposed amendments, on whether
the language of the proposed
amendments is sufficiently clear for
users to understand.
If the Commission decides to proceed
with this rulemaking after reviewing the
comments filed in response to this
notice, the proposed rule revisions will
be promulgated in accordance with the
applicable requirements of the
Administrative Procedure Act (‘‘APA’’)
(5 U.S.C. 553), and will be codified in
19 CFR part 210.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 335 of the Tariff Act of 1930
(19 U.S.C. 1335) authorizes the
Commission to adopt such reasonable
procedures, rules, and regulations as it
deems necessary to carry out its
functions and duties. This rulemaking
seeks to improve provisions of the
Commission’s existing Rules of Practice
and Procedure. The Commission
proposes amendments to its rules
covering investigations under section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.
1337) (‘‘section 337’’) in order to
increase the efficiency of its section 337
investigations.
This rulemaking effort began in 2010,
as part of an effort to gather information
on the public interest at an earlier stage
in the investigation, and to aid the
Commission in determining when to
delegate part of the development of the
record on the public interest to the
administrative law judge. The
Commission invites the public to
comment on all of these proposed rules
amendments. In any comments, please
consider addressing whether the
language of the proposed amendments
is sufficiently clear for users to
understand. In addition please consider
addressing how the proposed rules
amendments could be improved, and/or
offering specific constructive
alternatives where appropriate.
Consistent with its ordinary practice,
the Commission is issuing these
proposed amendments in accordance
with the applicable requirements of
section 553 of the APA. This procedure
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:54 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 223001
entails the following steps: (1)
Publication of a notice of proposed
rulemaking; (2) solicitation of public
comments on the proposed
amendments; (3) Commission review of
public comments on the proposed
amendments; and (4) publication of
final amendments at least thirty days
prior to their effective date.
Regulatory Analysis of Proposed
Amendments to the Commission’s Rules
The Commission has determined that
the final rules do not meet the criteria
described in section 3(f) of Executive
Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, Oct. 4, 1993)
and thus do not constitute a significant
regulatory action for purposes of the
Executive Order.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) is inapplicable to this
rulemaking because it is not one for
which a notice of final rulemaking is
required under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) or any
other statute. Although the Commission
has chosen to publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking, these proposed
regulations are ‘‘agency rules of
procedure and practice,’’ and thus are
exempt from the notice requirement
imposed by 5 U.S.C. 553(b).
These proposed rules do not contain
federalism implications warranting the
preparation of a federalism summary
impact statement pursuant to Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, Aug. 4,
1999).
No actions are necessary under the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.) because the
proposed rules will not result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100,000,000 or more
in any one year, and will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments.
The proposed rules are not major
rules as defined by section 804 of the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (5 U.S.C. 801 et
seq.). Moreover, they are exempt from
the reporting requirements of the
Contract With America Advancement
Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121) because
they concern rules of agency
organization, procedure, or practice that
do not substantially affect the rights or
obligations of non-agency parties.
The amendments are not subject to
section 3504(h) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.),
because it is part of an administrative
action or investigation against specific
individuals or entities. 44 U.S.C.
3518(c)(1)(B)(ii).
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Subpart C—Pleadings
Sections 210.12 and 210.13
Section 210.12 generally provides the
requirements for a complaint, and
§ 210.13 generally provides
requirements for responses to the
complaint. To obtain information from
the complainant on the existence and
nature of any public interest issues
raised by the complaint at the time of its
filing, the Commission proposes adding
a paragraph (a)(12) to § 210.12 to require
that the complainant provide in the
complaint specific information
regarding any public interest issues
arising from the complaint. The
complaint should address how issuance
of an exclusion order and/or a cease and
desist order in this investigation could
affect the public health and welfare in
the United States, competitive
conditions in the United States
economy, the production of like or
directly competitive articles in the
United States, or United States
consumers. In particular, the complaint
should:
• Explain how the articles potentially
subject to the orders are used in the
United States;
• Identify any public health, safety, or
welfare concerns in the United States
relating to the potential orders;
• Indicate the extent to which like or
directly competitive articles are
produced in the United States or are
otherwise available in the United States,
with respect to the articles potentially
subject to the orders; and
• Indicate whether Complainant,
Complainant’s licensees, and/or third
party suppliers have the capacity to
replace the volume of articles
potentially subject to an exclusion order
and a cease and desist order within a
commercially reasonable time.
The Commission further proposes
adding a paragraph (k) to § 210.12 to
provide that, when a complaint is filed,
the Secretary to the Commission will
publish a notice in the Federal Register
soliciting comments from the public
and/or the proposed respondents on any
public interest issues arising from the
complaint.
Similarly, to obtain information from
respondents on the existence and nature
of any public interest issues arising from
the complaint at the time of the
response to the complaint, the
Commission proposes adding a new
paragraph (b)(4) to § 210.13(b) to require
the respondents to respond to the public
interest issues raised by the complaint.
Respondents may also address any
comments received from the public with
respect to the public interest.
E:\FR\FM\01OCP1.SGM
01OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 190 / Friday, October 1, 2010 / Proposed Rules
Subpart G—Determinations and Actions
Taken
Sections 210.50
Section 210.50 provides that the
Commission, in the event of a violation
of section 337, shall consider the
appropriateness of an exclusion order or
a cease and desist order in light of the
public interest factors; the Commission
must also determine whether, and in
what amount, bonding is appropriate.
Thus, in the event of a violation of
section 337, it is the responsibility of
the Commission to make determinations
regarding remedy, the public interest,
and bonding. Section 210.50(a)(4)
provides that the Commission may
receive submissions from the parties
and the public on these issues. Section
210.50(b)(1) provides that the
administrative law judge shall take
evidence with respect to the issues of
remedy and bonding, but not with
respect to the public interest unless the
Commission orders otherwise. The
Commission proposes to amended
§ 210.50(b)(1) to also provide that if the
Commission orders the administrative
law judge to take evidence on the public
interest, the administrative judge shall
address the public interest in the
recommended determination under
§ 210.42(a)(1)(ii) and that the extent of
the taking of discovery by the parties
shall be at the discretion of the
presiding administrative law judge. The
Commission proposes to add language
to § 210.50(a)(4) to provide that, after
the service of the recommended
determination on remedy by the
presiding administrative law judge, the
parties are instructed to submit to the
Commission within 30 days any
information relating to the public
interest, including any updates to the
information provided in the complaint
and response as required by the
proposed amendments to §§ 210.12 and
210.13.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
List of Subjects in 19 CFR Part 210
Administrative practice and
procedure, Business and industry,
Customs duties and inspection, Imports,
Investigations.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the United States
International Trade Commission
proposes to amend 19 CFR part 210 as
follows:
PART 210—ADJUDICATION AND
ENFORCEMENT
1. The authority citation for part 210
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 19 U.S.C. 1333, 1335, and 1337.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:54 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 223001
Subpart C—Pleadings
2. Amend § 210.12 by adding
paragraphs (a)(12) and (k) to read as
follows:
§ 210.12
The complaint.
(a) * * *
(12) Provide specific information
regarding the public interest. Address
how issuance of an exclusion order and/
or a cease and desist order in this
investigation could affect the public
health and welfare in the United States,
competitive conditions in the United
States economy, the production of like
or directly competitive articles in the
United States, or United States
consumers. In particular,
(i) Explain how the articles
potentially subject to the orders are used
in the United States;
(ii) Identify any public health, safety,
or welfare concerns in the United States
relating to the potential orders;
(iii) Indicate the extent to which like
or directly competitive articles are
produced in the United States or are
otherwise available in the United States,
with respect to the articles potentially
subject to the orders; and
(iv) Indicate whether Complainant,
Complainant’s licensees, and/or third
party suppliers have the capacity to
replace the volume of articles
potentially subject to an exclusion order
and a cease and desist order within a
commercially reasonable time.
*
*
*
*
*
Publication of notice of filing. When
a complaint is filed, the Secretary to the
Commission will publish a notice in the
Federal Register soliciting comments
from the public and/or proposed
respondents on any public interest
issues arising from the complaint and
potential exclusion and/or cease and
desist orders. Members of the public
and proposed respondents may provide
specific information regarding the
public interest in a written submission
not to exceed five pages to the Secretary
to the Commission within five days of
publication of notice of the filing of a
complaint. Members of the public and
proposed respondents may address how
issuance of an exclusion order and/or a
cease and desist order in this
investigation could affect the public
health and welfare in the United States,
competitive conditions in the United
States economy, the production of like
or directly competitive articles in the
United States, or United States
consumers. In particular, members of
the public and proposed respondents
may:
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
60673
(i) Explain how the articles
potentially subject to the orders are used
in the United States;
(ii) Identify any public health, safety,
or welfare concerns in the United States
relating to the potential orders;
(iii) Indicate the extent to which like
or directly competitive articles are
produced in the United States or are
otherwise available in the United States,
with respect to the articles potentially
subject to the orders; and
(iv) Indicate whether Complainant,
Complainant’s licensees, and/or third
party suppliers have the capacity to
replace the volume of articles
potentially subject to an exclusion order
and a cease and desist order within a
commercially reasonable time.
3. Amend § 210.13 by adding a
paragraph (b)(4) to read as follows:
§ 210.13
The response.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
Provide additional information on the
public interest, as well as respond to the
issues raised by the complaint as set
forth in § 210.12(a)(12). The response
may also address any comments
received from members of the public
with respect to the public interest
pursuant to § 210.12(k).
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart G—Determinations and
Actions Taken
3. Amend § 210.50 by revising
paragraphs (a)(4) and (b)(1) to read as
follows:
§ 210.50 Commission action, the public
interest, and bonding by respondents.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(4) Receive submissions from the
parties, interested persons, and other
Government agencies and departments
with respect to the subject matter of
paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2), and (a)(3) of
this section. After a recommended
determination on remedy is certified by
the presiding administrative law judge,
the parties are instructed to submit to
the Commission, within 30 days from
service of the recommended
determination, any information relating
to the public interest, including any
updates to the information requested by
§§ 210.12(a)(12) and 210.13(b)(4).
Members of the public may also submit
information with respect to the public
interest.
(b) * * *
(1) With respect to an administrative
law judge’s ability to take evidence or
other information and to hear arguments
from the parties and other interested
persons on the issues of appropriate
E:\FR\FM\01OCP1.SGM
01OCP1
60674
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 190 / Friday, October 1, 2010 / Proposed Rules
Commission action, the public interest,
and bonding by the respondents for
purposes of an initial determination on
temporary relief, see §§ 210.61, 210.62,
and 210.66(a). For purposes of the
recommended determination required
by § 210.42(a)(1)(ii), an administrative
law judge shall take evidence or other
information and hear arguments from
the parties and other interested persons
on the issues of appropriate
Commission action and bonding by the
respondents. Unless the Commission
orders otherwise, an administrative law
judge shall not take evidence on the
issue of the public interest for purposes
of the recommended determination
under § 210.42(a)(1)(ii). If the
Commission orders the administrative
law judge to take evidence with respect
to the public interest, the extent of the
taking of discovery by the parties shall
be at the discretion of the presiding
administrative law judge.
*
*
*
*
*
By order of the Commission.
Issued: September 27, 2010.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010–24563 Filed 9–30–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 62
[Public Notice: 7077]
RIN 1400–AC67
Exchange Visitor Program—Fees and
Charges
U.S. Department of State.
Proposed rule with request for
comment.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The U.S. Department of State
(Department) is proposing to revise its
Fees and Charges assessed for providing
Exchange Visitor Program (EVP)
services to recoup the Department’s
costs associated with operating all
aspects of the Exchange Visitor Program.
DATES: The Department will accept
comments from the public through
November 30, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by any of the following
methods:
• Persons with access to the Internet
will be able to view and comment on
the rule and supporting documentation,
including the supporting cost study, by
going to the Regulations.gov Web site
https://www.regulations.gov/search/
Regs/home.html#home, and searching
on docket ID DOS–2010–0214.
• Mail (paper, disk, or CD–ROM
submissions): U.S. Department of State,
Office of Designation, SA–5, Floor 5,
2200 C Street, NW., Washington, DC
20522
• E-mail: JExchanges@state.gov. You
must include the title and RIN (1400–
AC67) in the subject line of your
message.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stanley S. Colvin, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Private Sector Exchange,
U.S. Department of State, SA–5, Floor 5,
2200 C Street, NW., Washington, DC
20522, 202–632–2805, or email at
jexchanges@state.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
authority of Section 810 of the United
States Information and Educational
Exchange Act of 1948, as amended, 22
U.S.C. 1475e, and the Independent
Offices Appropriations Act of 1952
(IOAA), 31 U.S.C. 9701, and following
the guidelines set forth in Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
SUMMARY:
Circular No. A–25, user fees for
Exchange Visitor Program Services were
adopted for the first time in 2000.
Regulations adopting sufficient fees to
recover the full cost of its administrative
processing of requests for designation,
redesignation, and for requests by
program participants for certain services
for which application is required were
adopted. OMB Circular No. A–25 directs
the Agency review of fees and services
every two years.
The current fee for an application for
designation or an application for
redesignation is $1,748.00 and the fee
for foreign national exchange
participants requesting individual
program services, including a change of
program category, program extension,
reinstatement, etc. is currently $246.00
per request. The Department proposes
amendment of both fees to: $2,700 and
$233.00 respectively. The new proposed
fee for either program designation or
redesignation will increase by $952
(redesignation is required every two
years) while the fee assessed program
participants will decrease by $13.00.
The increase in program designation
and redesigantion requests is necessary
to recoup the costs of application
reviews, requests for amendments to
program designations, and allotment
requests, as well as the cost for
enhanced compliance programs,
regulatory review and development,
outreach and general program
administration, as explained below.
These changes are necessary because the
current fee for program designation and
redesignation applications was
calculated on a unit cost basis that
assumed and projected a larger number
of such applications than has proven to
be received.
Current
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Designation/Redesignation ......................................................................
Individual Applications .............................................................................
The U.S. Department of State designates
U.S. government, academic, and private
sector entities to conduct educational
and cultural exchange programs
pursuant to a broad grant of authority
provided by the Mutual Educational and
Cultural Exchange Act of 1961, as
amended (Fulbright-Hays Act), 22
U.S.C. 2451 et seq.; the Immigration and
Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(J);
the Foreign Affairs Reform and
Restructuring Act of 1998, Public Law
105–277; as well as other statutory
enactments, Reorganization Plans and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:54 Sep 30, 2010
Jkt 223001
$1,748.00
246.00
Executive Orders. Under those
authorities, 1,226 sponsor organizations
facilitate the entry of more than 300,000
exchange participants each year.
The Fulbright-Hays Act is the organic
legislation underpinning the entire
Exchange Visitor Program. Section 101
of that Act sets forth the purpose of the
Act, viz., ‘‘to enable the Government of
the United States to increase mutual
understanding between the people of
the United States and the people of
other countries by means of educational
and cultural exchange * * * .’’ The Act
authorizes the President to provide for
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Proposed
Sfmt 4702
$2,700.00
233.00
Increase/Decrease
$952
¥$13
such exchanges when he considers that
it would strengthen international
cooperative relations. The language of
the Act and its legislative history make
it clear that Congress considered
international educational and cultural
exchanges to be a significant part of the
public diplomacy efforts of the
President in connection with his
Constitutional prerogatives in
conducting foreign affairs.
On September 27, 1999, the United
States Information Agency (USIA)
issued an interim final rule on the
adoption of fees for all requests for an
E:\FR\FM\01OCP1.SGM
01OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 190 (Friday, October 1, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 60671-60674]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24563]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
19 CFR Part 210
Rules of Adjudication and Enforcement
AGENCY: International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The United States International Trade Commission
(``Commission'') proposes to amend its Rules of Practice and Procedure
concerning rules of general application, adjudication, and enforcement.
The amendments are necessary to gather more information on public
interest issues arising from complaints filed with the Commission
requesting institution of an investigation under section 337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337. The intended effect of
the proposed amendments is to aid the Commission in identifying
investigations that require further development of public interest
issues in the record, and to identify and develop information regarding
the public interest at each stage of the investigation.
DATES: To be assured of consideration, written comments must be
received by 5:15 p.m. on November 30, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number MISC-
032, by any of the following methods:
--Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
--Agency Web Site: https://www.usitc.gov. Follow the instructions for
submitting comments on the web site at https://www.usitc.gov/secretary/edis.htm.
--E-mail: james.worth@usitc.gov. Include docket number MISC-032 in the
subject line of the message.
--Mail: For paper submission. U.S. International Trade Commission, 500
E Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC 20436.
--Hand Delivery/Courier: U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC 20436. From the hours of 8:45
a.m. to 5:15 p.m.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number (MISC-032), along with a cover letter stating the
nature of the commenter's interest in the proposed rulemaking. All
comments received will be posted without change to https://www.usitc.gov, including any personal information provided. For paper
copies, a signed original and 14 copies of each set of comments should
be submitted to Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC 20436.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://www.usitc.gov and/or the U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112,
Washington, DC 20436.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Worth, telephone 202-205-3065,
or Megan Valentine, telephone, 202-708-2301, Office of the General
Counsel, United States International Trade Commission. Hearing-impaired
individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained
by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal at 202-205-1810. General
information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing
its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
[[Page 60672]]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The preamble below is designed to assist
readers in understanding these proposed amendments to the Commission
Rules. This preamble provides background information, a regulatory
analysis of the proposed amendments, a section-by-section explanation
of the proposed amendments to part 210, and a description of the
proposed amendments to the rules. The Commission encourages members of
the public to comment, in addition to any other comments they wish to
make on the proposed amendments, on whether the language of the
proposed amendments is sufficiently clear for users to understand.
If the Commission decides to proceed with this rulemaking after
reviewing the comments filed in response to this notice, the proposed
rule revisions will be promulgated in accordance with the applicable
requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act (``APA'') (5 U.S.C.
553), and will be codified in 19 CFR part 210.
Background
Section 335 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1335) authorizes
the Commission to adopt such reasonable procedures, rules, and
regulations as it deems necessary to carry out its functions and
duties. This rulemaking seeks to improve provisions of the Commission's
existing Rules of Practice and Procedure. The Commission proposes
amendments to its rules covering investigations under section 337 of
the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) (``section 337'') in order to
increase the efficiency of its section 337 investigations.
This rulemaking effort began in 2010, as part of an effort to
gather information on the public interest at an earlier stage in the
investigation, and to aid the Commission in determining when to
delegate part of the development of the record on the public interest
to the administrative law judge. The Commission invites the public to
comment on all of these proposed rules amendments. In any comments,
please consider addressing whether the language of the proposed
amendments is sufficiently clear for users to understand. In addition
please consider addressing how the proposed rules amendments could be
improved, and/or offering specific constructive alternatives where
appropriate.
Consistent with its ordinary practice, the Commission is issuing
these proposed amendments in accordance with the applicable
requirements of section 553 of the APA. This procedure entails the
following steps: (1) Publication of a notice of proposed rulemaking;
(2) solicitation of public comments on the proposed amendments; (3)
Commission review of public comments on the proposed amendments; and
(4) publication of final amendments at least thirty days prior to their
effective date.
Regulatory Analysis of Proposed Amendments to the Commission's Rules
The Commission has determined that the final rules do not meet the
criteria described in section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, Oct. 4, 1993) and thus do not constitute a significant
regulatory action for purposes of the Executive Order.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) is
inapplicable to this rulemaking because it is not one for which a
notice of final rulemaking is required under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) or any
other statute. Although the Commission has chosen to publish a notice
of proposed rulemaking, these proposed regulations are ``agency rules
of procedure and practice,'' and thus are exempt from the notice
requirement imposed by 5 U.S.C. 553(b).
These proposed rules do not contain federalism implications
warranting the preparation of a federalism summary impact statement
pursuant to Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, Aug. 4, 1999).
No actions are necessary under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995 (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.) because the proposed rules will not result
in the expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100,000,000 or more in any one
year, and will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments.
The proposed rules are not major rules as defined by section 804 of
the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (5
U.S.C. 801 et seq.). Moreover, they are exempt from the reporting
requirements of the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996 (Pub.
L. 104-121) because they concern rules of agency organization,
procedure, or practice that do not substantially affect the rights or
obligations of non-agency parties.
The amendments are not subject to section 3504(h) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), because it is part of an
administrative action or investigation against specific individuals or
entities. 44 U.S.C. 3518(c)(1)(B)(ii).
Subpart C--Pleadings
Sections 210.12 and 210.13
Section 210.12 generally provides the requirements for a complaint,
and Sec. 210.13 generally provides requirements for responses to the
complaint. To obtain information from the complainant on the existence
and nature of any public interest issues raised by the complaint at the
time of its filing, the Commission proposes adding a paragraph (a)(12)
to Sec. 210.12 to require that the complainant provide in the
complaint specific information regarding any public interest issues
arising from the complaint. The complaint should address how issuance
of an exclusion order and/or a cease and desist order in this
investigation could affect the public health and welfare in the United
States, competitive conditions in the United States economy, the
production of like or directly competitive articles in the United
States, or United States consumers. In particular, the complaint
should:
Explain how the articles potentially subject to the orders
are used in the United States;
Identify any public health, safety, or welfare concerns in
the United States relating to the potential orders;
Indicate the extent to which like or directly competitive
articles are produced in the United States or are otherwise available
in the United States, with respect to the articles potentially subject
to the orders; and
Indicate whether Complainant, Complainant's licensees,
and/or third party suppliers have the capacity to replace the volume of
articles potentially subject to an exclusion order and a cease and
desist order within a commercially reasonable time.
The Commission further proposes adding a paragraph (k) to Sec. 210.12
to provide that, when a complaint is filed, the Secretary to the
Commission will publish a notice in the Federal Register soliciting
comments from the public and/or the proposed respondents on any public
interest issues arising from the complaint.
Similarly, to obtain information from respondents on the existence
and nature of any public interest issues arising from the complaint at
the time of the response to the complaint, the Commission proposes
adding a new paragraph (b)(4) to Sec. 210.13(b) to require the
respondents to respond to the public interest issues raised by the
complaint. Respondents may also address any comments received from the
public with respect to the public interest.
[[Page 60673]]
Subpart G--Determinations and Actions Taken
Sections 210.50
Section 210.50 provides that the Commission, in the event of a
violation of section 337, shall consider the appropriateness of an
exclusion order or a cease and desist order in light of the public
interest factors; the Commission must also determine whether, and in
what amount, bonding is appropriate. Thus, in the event of a violation
of section 337, it is the responsibility of the Commission to make
determinations regarding remedy, the public interest, and bonding.
Section 210.50(a)(4) provides that the Commission may receive
submissions from the parties and the public on these issues. Section
210.50(b)(1) provides that the administrative law judge shall take
evidence with respect to the issues of remedy and bonding, but not with
respect to the public interest unless the Commission orders otherwise.
The Commission proposes to amended Sec. 210.50(b)(1) to also provide
that if the Commission orders the administrative law judge to take
evidence on the public interest, the administrative judge shall address
the public interest in the recommended determination under Sec.
210.42(a)(1)(ii) and that the extent of the taking of discovery by the
parties shall be at the discretion of the presiding administrative law
judge. The Commission proposes to add language to Sec. 210.50(a)(4) to
provide that, after the service of the recommended determination on
remedy by the presiding administrative law judge, the parties are
instructed to submit to the Commission within 30 days any information
relating to the public interest, including any updates to the
information provided in the complaint and response as required by the
proposed amendments to Sec. Sec. 210.12 and 210.13.
List of Subjects in 19 CFR Part 210
Administrative practice and procedure, Business and industry,
Customs duties and inspection, Imports, Investigations.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the United States
International Trade Commission proposes to amend 19 CFR part 210 as
follows:
PART 210--ADJUDICATION AND ENFORCEMENT
1. The authority citation for part 210 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 19 U.S.C. 1333, 1335, and 1337.
Subpart C--Pleadings
2. Amend Sec. 210.12 by adding paragraphs (a)(12) and (k) to read
as follows:
Sec. 210.12 The complaint.
(a) * * *
(12) Provide specific information regarding the public interest.
Address how issuance of an exclusion order and/or a cease and desist
order in this investigation could affect the public health and welfare
in the United States, competitive conditions in the United States
economy, the production of like or directly competitive articles in the
United States, or United States consumers. In particular,
(i) Explain how the articles potentially subject to the orders are
used in the United States;
(ii) Identify any public health, safety, or welfare concerns in the
United States relating to the potential orders;
(iii) Indicate the extent to which like or directly competitive
articles are produced in the United States or are otherwise available
in the United States, with respect to the articles potentially subject
to the orders; and
(iv) Indicate whether Complainant, Complainant's licensees, and/or
third party suppliers have the capacity to replace the volume of
articles potentially subject to an exclusion order and a cease and
desist order within a commercially reasonable time.
* * * * *
Publication of notice of filing. When a complaint is filed, the
Secretary to the Commission will publish a notice in the Federal
Register soliciting comments from the public and/or proposed
respondents on any public interest issues arising from the complaint
and potential exclusion and/or cease and desist orders. Members of the
public and proposed respondents may provide specific information
regarding the public interest in a written submission not to exceed
five pages to the Secretary to the Commission within five days of
publication of notice of the filing of a complaint. Members of the
public and proposed respondents may address how issuance of an
exclusion order and/or a cease and desist order in this investigation
could affect the public health and welfare in the United States,
competitive conditions in the United States economy, the production of
like or directly competitive articles in the United States, or United
States consumers. In particular, members of the public and proposed
respondents may:
(i) Explain how the articles potentially subject to the orders are
used in the United States;
(ii) Identify any public health, safety, or welfare concerns in the
United States relating to the potential orders;
(iii) Indicate the extent to which like or directly competitive
articles are produced in the United States or are otherwise available
in the United States, with respect to the articles potentially subject
to the orders; and
(iv) Indicate whether Complainant, Complainant's licensees, and/or
third party suppliers have the capacity to replace the volume of
articles potentially subject to an exclusion order and a cease and
desist order within a commercially reasonable time.
3. Amend Sec. 210.13 by adding a paragraph (b)(4) to read as
follows:
Sec. 210.13 The response.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
Provide additional information on the public interest, as well as
respond to the issues raised by the complaint as set forth in Sec.
210.12(a)(12). The response may also address any comments received from
members of the public with respect to the public interest pursuant to
Sec. 210.12(k).
* * * * *
Subpart G--Determinations and Actions Taken
3. Amend Sec. 210.50 by revising paragraphs (a)(4) and (b)(1) to
read as follows:
Sec. 210.50 Commission action, the public interest, and bonding by
respondents.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(4) Receive submissions from the parties, interested persons, and
other Government agencies and departments with respect to the subject
matter of paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2), and (a)(3) of this section. After
a recommended determination on remedy is certified by the presiding
administrative law judge, the parties are instructed to submit to the
Commission, within 30 days from service of the recommended
determination, any information relating to the public interest,
including any updates to the information requested by Sec. Sec.
210.12(a)(12) and 210.13(b)(4). Members of the public may also submit
information with respect to the public interest.
(b) * * *
(1) With respect to an administrative law judge's ability to take
evidence or other information and to hear arguments from the parties
and other interested persons on the issues of appropriate
[[Page 60674]]
Commission action, the public interest, and bonding by the respondents
for purposes of an initial determination on temporary relief, see
Sec. Sec. 210.61, 210.62, and 210.66(a). For purposes of the
recommended determination required by Sec. 210.42(a)(1)(ii), an
administrative law judge shall take evidence or other information and
hear arguments from the parties and other interested persons on the
issues of appropriate Commission action and bonding by the respondents.
Unless the Commission orders otherwise, an administrative law judge
shall not take evidence on the issue of the public interest for
purposes of the recommended determination under Sec. 210.42(a)(1)(ii).
If the Commission orders the administrative law judge to take evidence
with respect to the public interest, the extent of the taking of
discovery by the parties shall be at the discretion of the presiding
administrative law judge.
* * * * *
By order of the Commission.
Issued: September 27, 2010.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-24563 Filed 9-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P