Rules of Adjudication and Enforcement, 60671-60674 [2010-24563]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 190 / Friday, October 1, 2010 / Proposed Rules PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. § 39.13 [Amended] 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding the following new AD: Hawker Beechcraft Corporation (Type Certificate Previously Held by Raytheon Aircraft Company; Beech Aircraft Corporation): Docket No. FAA–2010– 0954; Directorate Identifier 2010–NM– 078–AD. Comments Due Date (a) We must receive comments by November 15, 2010. Affected ADs (b) None. Applicability (c) This AD applies to Hawker Beechcraft Corporation (Type Certificate previously held by Raytheon Aircraft Company; Beech Aircraft Corporation), certificated in any category; as identified in paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of this AD. (1) Model 400A airplanes having serial numbers RK–337 through RK–484, RK–486 through RK–570 inclusive, RK–572, RK–573, and RK–575 through RK–577 inclusive. (2) Model 400T airplane having serial number TX–13. Subject (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 54: Nacelles/Pylons. Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed inspection is: ‘‘An intensive examination of a specific item, installation, or assembly to detect damage, failure, or irregularity. Available lighting is normally supplemented with a direct source of good lighting at an intensity deemed appropriate. Inspection aids such as mirror, magnifying lenses, etc., may be necessary. Surface cleaning and elaborate procedures may be required.’’ Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs) (h)(1) The Manager, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Thomas Teplik, Aerospace Engineer, Systems and Propulsion Branch, ACE–116W, FAA, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1801 Airport Road, Room 100, Mid-Continent Airport, Wichita, Kansas 67209; telephone (316) 946–4196; fax (316) 946–4107. (2) To request a different method of compliance or a different compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or principal avionics inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector, your local Flight Standards District Office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD. Issued in Renton, Washington, on September 23, 2010. Ali Bahrami, Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. 2010–24714 Filed 9–30–10; 8:45 am] Compliance (f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the actions have already been done. jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS Unsafe Condition (e) This AD results from reports of missing sealant on the left and right pylon firewall structures. The Federal Aviation Administration is issuing this AD to detect and correct missing sealant on the left and right pylon firewall structures, which, in the event of an engine fire, could result in flames penetrating the seams in the firewall between the engine and the aft fuselage, and a subsequent uncontrolled fire in the aft fuselage. AGENCY: Inspection and Corrective Action (g) Within 200 flight hours or 12 months after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first: Do a detailed inspection for appropriate coverage of firewall sealant of the left and right pylon firewall structure, as specified in the figures of Hawker Beechcraft Mandatory Service Bulletin SB 54–3946, Revision 2, dated February 2010, and all applicable corrective actions; in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Hawker Beechcraft Mandatory Service Bulletin SB 54–3946, Revision 2, dated February 2010. Do all applicable corrective actions before further flight. VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:54 Sep 30, 2010 Jkt 223001 BILLING CODE 4910–13–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION 19 CFR Part 210 Rules of Adjudication and Enforcement International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. The United States International Trade Commission (‘‘Commission’’) proposes to amend its Rules of Practice and Procedure concerning rules of general application, adjudication, and enforcement. The amendments are necessary to gather more information on public interest issues arising from complaints filed with the Commission requesting institution of an investigation under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337. The intended effect of the proposed amendments is to aid the Commission in identifying SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 60671 investigations that require further development of public interest issues in the record, and to identify and develop information regarding the public interest at each stage of the investigation. To be assured of consideration, written comments must be received by 5:15 p.m. on November 30, 2010. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number MISC–032, by any of the following methods: —Federal eRulemaking Portal: https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. —Agency Web Site: https:// www.usitc.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments on the web site at https:// www.usitc.gov/secretary/edis.htm. —E-mail: james.worth@usitc.gov. Include docket number MISC–032 in the subject line of the message. —Mail: For paper submission. U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC 20436. —Hand Delivery/Courier: U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC 20436. From the hours of 8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m. Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name and docket number (MISC–032), along with a cover letter stating the nature of the commenter’s interest in the proposed rulemaking. All comments received will be posted without change to https:// www.usitc.gov, including any personal information provided. For paper copies, a signed original and 14 copies of each set of comments should be submitted to Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC 20436. Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or comments received, go to https:// www.usitc.gov and/or the U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC 20436. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Worth, telephone 202–205–3065, or Megan Valentine, telephone, 202– 708–2301, Office of the General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission. Hearing-impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal at 202–205–1810. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. DATES: E:\FR\FM\01OCP1.SGM 01OCP1 60672 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 190 / Friday, October 1, 2010 / Proposed Rules The preamble below is designed to assist readers in understanding these proposed amendments to the Commission Rules. This preamble provides background information, a regulatory analysis of the proposed amendments, a section-by-section explanation of the proposed amendments to part 210, and a description of the proposed amendments to the rules. The Commission encourages members of the public to comment, in addition to any other comments they wish to make on the proposed amendments, on whether the language of the proposed amendments is sufficiently clear for users to understand. If the Commission decides to proceed with this rulemaking after reviewing the comments filed in response to this notice, the proposed rule revisions will be promulgated in accordance with the applicable requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act (‘‘APA’’) (5 U.S.C. 553), and will be codified in 19 CFR part 210. jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background Section 335 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1335) authorizes the Commission to adopt such reasonable procedures, rules, and regulations as it deems necessary to carry out its functions and duties. This rulemaking seeks to improve provisions of the Commission’s existing Rules of Practice and Procedure. The Commission proposes amendments to its rules covering investigations under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) (‘‘section 337’’) in order to increase the efficiency of its section 337 investigations. This rulemaking effort began in 2010, as part of an effort to gather information on the public interest at an earlier stage in the investigation, and to aid the Commission in determining when to delegate part of the development of the record on the public interest to the administrative law judge. The Commission invites the public to comment on all of these proposed rules amendments. In any comments, please consider addressing whether the language of the proposed amendments is sufficiently clear for users to understand. In addition please consider addressing how the proposed rules amendments could be improved, and/or offering specific constructive alternatives where appropriate. Consistent with its ordinary practice, the Commission is issuing these proposed amendments in accordance with the applicable requirements of section 553 of the APA. This procedure VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:54 Sep 30, 2010 Jkt 223001 entails the following steps: (1) Publication of a notice of proposed rulemaking; (2) solicitation of public comments on the proposed amendments; (3) Commission review of public comments on the proposed amendments; and (4) publication of final amendments at least thirty days prior to their effective date. Regulatory Analysis of Proposed Amendments to the Commission’s Rules The Commission has determined that the final rules do not meet the criteria described in section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, Oct. 4, 1993) and thus do not constitute a significant regulatory action for purposes of the Executive Order. The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) is inapplicable to this rulemaking because it is not one for which a notice of final rulemaking is required under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) or any other statute. Although the Commission has chosen to publish a notice of proposed rulemaking, these proposed regulations are ‘‘agency rules of procedure and practice,’’ and thus are exempt from the notice requirement imposed by 5 U.S.C. 553(b). These proposed rules do not contain federalism implications warranting the preparation of a federalism summary impact statement pursuant to Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, Aug. 4, 1999). No actions are necessary under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.) because the proposed rules will not result in the expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100,000,000 or more in any one year, and will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. The proposed rules are not major rules as defined by section 804 of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.). Moreover, they are exempt from the reporting requirements of the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121) because they concern rules of agency organization, procedure, or practice that do not substantially affect the rights or obligations of non-agency parties. The amendments are not subject to section 3504(h) of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), because it is part of an administrative action or investigation against specific individuals or entities. 44 U.S.C. 3518(c)(1)(B)(ii). PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 Subpart C—Pleadings Sections 210.12 and 210.13 Section 210.12 generally provides the requirements for a complaint, and § 210.13 generally provides requirements for responses to the complaint. To obtain information from the complainant on the existence and nature of any public interest issues raised by the complaint at the time of its filing, the Commission proposes adding a paragraph (a)(12) to § 210.12 to require that the complainant provide in the complaint specific information regarding any public interest issues arising from the complaint. The complaint should address how issuance of an exclusion order and/or a cease and desist order in this investigation could affect the public health and welfare in the United States, competitive conditions in the United States economy, the production of like or directly competitive articles in the United States, or United States consumers. In particular, the complaint should: • Explain how the articles potentially subject to the orders are used in the United States; • Identify any public health, safety, or welfare concerns in the United States relating to the potential orders; • Indicate the extent to which like or directly competitive articles are produced in the United States or are otherwise available in the United States, with respect to the articles potentially subject to the orders; and • Indicate whether Complainant, Complainant’s licensees, and/or third party suppliers have the capacity to replace the volume of articles potentially subject to an exclusion order and a cease and desist order within a commercially reasonable time. The Commission further proposes adding a paragraph (k) to § 210.12 to provide that, when a complaint is filed, the Secretary to the Commission will publish a notice in the Federal Register soliciting comments from the public and/or the proposed respondents on any public interest issues arising from the complaint. Similarly, to obtain information from respondents on the existence and nature of any public interest issues arising from the complaint at the time of the response to the complaint, the Commission proposes adding a new paragraph (b)(4) to § 210.13(b) to require the respondents to respond to the public interest issues raised by the complaint. Respondents may also address any comments received from the public with respect to the public interest. E:\FR\FM\01OCP1.SGM 01OCP1 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 190 / Friday, October 1, 2010 / Proposed Rules Subpart G—Determinations and Actions Taken Sections 210.50 Section 210.50 provides that the Commission, in the event of a violation of section 337, shall consider the appropriateness of an exclusion order or a cease and desist order in light of the public interest factors; the Commission must also determine whether, and in what amount, bonding is appropriate. Thus, in the event of a violation of section 337, it is the responsibility of the Commission to make determinations regarding remedy, the public interest, and bonding. Section 210.50(a)(4) provides that the Commission may receive submissions from the parties and the public on these issues. Section 210.50(b)(1) provides that the administrative law judge shall take evidence with respect to the issues of remedy and bonding, but not with respect to the public interest unless the Commission orders otherwise. The Commission proposes to amended § 210.50(b)(1) to also provide that if the Commission orders the administrative law judge to take evidence on the public interest, the administrative judge shall address the public interest in the recommended determination under § 210.42(a)(1)(ii) and that the extent of the taking of discovery by the parties shall be at the discretion of the presiding administrative law judge. The Commission proposes to add language to § 210.50(a)(4) to provide that, after the service of the recommended determination on remedy by the presiding administrative law judge, the parties are instructed to submit to the Commission within 30 days any information relating to the public interest, including any updates to the information provided in the complaint and response as required by the proposed amendments to §§ 210.12 and 210.13. jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS List of Subjects in 19 CFR Part 210 Administrative practice and procedure, Business and industry, Customs duties and inspection, Imports, Investigations. For the reasons stated in the preamble, the United States International Trade Commission proposes to amend 19 CFR part 210 as follows: PART 210—ADJUDICATION AND ENFORCEMENT 1. The authority citation for part 210 continues to read as follows: Authority: 19 U.S.C. 1333, 1335, and 1337. VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:54 Sep 30, 2010 Jkt 223001 Subpart C—Pleadings 2. Amend § 210.12 by adding paragraphs (a)(12) and (k) to read as follows: § 210.12 The complaint. (a) * * * (12) Provide specific information regarding the public interest. Address how issuance of an exclusion order and/ or a cease and desist order in this investigation could affect the public health and welfare in the United States, competitive conditions in the United States economy, the production of like or directly competitive articles in the United States, or United States consumers. In particular, (i) Explain how the articles potentially subject to the orders are used in the United States; (ii) Identify any public health, safety, or welfare concerns in the United States relating to the potential orders; (iii) Indicate the extent to which like or directly competitive articles are produced in the United States or are otherwise available in the United States, with respect to the articles potentially subject to the orders; and (iv) Indicate whether Complainant, Complainant’s licensees, and/or third party suppliers have the capacity to replace the volume of articles potentially subject to an exclusion order and a cease and desist order within a commercially reasonable time. * * * * * Publication of notice of filing. When a complaint is filed, the Secretary to the Commission will publish a notice in the Federal Register soliciting comments from the public and/or proposed respondents on any public interest issues arising from the complaint and potential exclusion and/or cease and desist orders. Members of the public and proposed respondents may provide specific information regarding the public interest in a written submission not to exceed five pages to the Secretary to the Commission within five days of publication of notice of the filing of a complaint. Members of the public and proposed respondents may address how issuance of an exclusion order and/or a cease and desist order in this investigation could affect the public health and welfare in the United States, competitive conditions in the United States economy, the production of like or directly competitive articles in the United States, or United States consumers. In particular, members of the public and proposed respondents may: PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 60673 (i) Explain how the articles potentially subject to the orders are used in the United States; (ii) Identify any public health, safety, or welfare concerns in the United States relating to the potential orders; (iii) Indicate the extent to which like or directly competitive articles are produced in the United States or are otherwise available in the United States, with respect to the articles potentially subject to the orders; and (iv) Indicate whether Complainant, Complainant’s licensees, and/or third party suppliers have the capacity to replace the volume of articles potentially subject to an exclusion order and a cease and desist order within a commercially reasonable time. 3. Amend § 210.13 by adding a paragraph (b)(4) to read as follows: § 210.13 The response. * * * * * (b) * * * Provide additional information on the public interest, as well as respond to the issues raised by the complaint as set forth in § 210.12(a)(12). The response may also address any comments received from members of the public with respect to the public interest pursuant to § 210.12(k). * * * * * Subpart G—Determinations and Actions Taken 3. Amend § 210.50 by revising paragraphs (a)(4) and (b)(1) to read as follows: § 210.50 Commission action, the public interest, and bonding by respondents. * * * * * (a) * * * (4) Receive submissions from the parties, interested persons, and other Government agencies and departments with respect to the subject matter of paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2), and (a)(3) of this section. After a recommended determination on remedy is certified by the presiding administrative law judge, the parties are instructed to submit to the Commission, within 30 days from service of the recommended determination, any information relating to the public interest, including any updates to the information requested by §§ 210.12(a)(12) and 210.13(b)(4). Members of the public may also submit information with respect to the public interest. (b) * * * (1) With respect to an administrative law judge’s ability to take evidence or other information and to hear arguments from the parties and other interested persons on the issues of appropriate E:\FR\FM\01OCP1.SGM 01OCP1 60674 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 190 / Friday, October 1, 2010 / Proposed Rules Commission action, the public interest, and bonding by the respondents for purposes of an initial determination on temporary relief, see §§ 210.61, 210.62, and 210.66(a). For purposes of the recommended determination required by § 210.42(a)(1)(ii), an administrative law judge shall take evidence or other information and hear arguments from the parties and other interested persons on the issues of appropriate Commission action and bonding by the respondents. Unless the Commission orders otherwise, an administrative law judge shall not take evidence on the issue of the public interest for purposes of the recommended determination under § 210.42(a)(1)(ii). If the Commission orders the administrative law judge to take evidence with respect to the public interest, the extent of the taking of discovery by the parties shall be at the discretion of the presiding administrative law judge. * * * * * By order of the Commission. Issued: September 27, 2010. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2010–24563 Filed 9–30–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF STATE 22 CFR Part 62 [Public Notice: 7077] RIN 1400–AC67 Exchange Visitor Program—Fees and Charges U.S. Department of State. Proposed rule with request for comment. AGENCY: ACTION: The U.S. Department of State (Department) is proposing to revise its Fees and Charges assessed for providing Exchange Visitor Program (EVP) services to recoup the Department’s costs associated with operating all aspects of the Exchange Visitor Program. DATES: The Department will accept comments from the public through November 30, 2010. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by any of the following methods: • Persons with access to the Internet will be able to view and comment on the rule and supporting documentation, including the supporting cost study, by going to the Regulations.gov Web site https://www.regulations.gov/search/ Regs/home.html#home, and searching on docket ID DOS–2010–0214. • Mail (paper, disk, or CD–ROM submissions): U.S. Department of State, Office of Designation, SA–5, Floor 5, 2200 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20522 • E-mail: JExchanges@state.gov. You must include the title and RIN (1400– AC67) in the subject line of your message. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stanley S. Colvin, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Private Sector Exchange, U.S. Department of State, SA–5, Floor 5, 2200 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20522, 202–632–2805, or email at jexchanges@state.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the authority of Section 810 of the United States Information and Educational Exchange Act of 1948, as amended, 22 U.S.C. 1475e, and the Independent Offices Appropriations Act of 1952 (IOAA), 31 U.S.C. 9701, and following the guidelines set forth in Office of Management and Budget (OMB) SUMMARY: Circular No. A–25, user fees for Exchange Visitor Program Services were adopted for the first time in 2000. Regulations adopting sufficient fees to recover the full cost of its administrative processing of requests for designation, redesignation, and for requests by program participants for certain services for which application is required were adopted. OMB Circular No. A–25 directs the Agency review of fees and services every two years. The current fee for an application for designation or an application for redesignation is $1,748.00 and the fee for foreign national exchange participants requesting individual program services, including a change of program category, program extension, reinstatement, etc. is currently $246.00 per request. The Department proposes amendment of both fees to: $2,700 and $233.00 respectively. The new proposed fee for either program designation or redesignation will increase by $952 (redesignation is required every two years) while the fee assessed program participants will decrease by $13.00. The increase in program designation and redesigantion requests is necessary to recoup the costs of application reviews, requests for amendments to program designations, and allotment requests, as well as the cost for enhanced compliance programs, regulatory review and development, outreach and general program administration, as explained below. These changes are necessary because the current fee for program designation and redesignation applications was calculated on a unit cost basis that assumed and projected a larger number of such applications than has proven to be received. Current jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS Designation/Redesignation ...................................................................... Individual Applications ............................................................................. The U.S. Department of State designates U.S. government, academic, and private sector entities to conduct educational and cultural exchange programs pursuant to a broad grant of authority provided by the Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961, as amended (Fulbright-Hays Act), 22 U.S.C. 2451 et seq.; the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(J); the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998, Public Law 105–277; as well as other statutory enactments, Reorganization Plans and VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:54 Sep 30, 2010 Jkt 223001 $1,748.00 246.00 Executive Orders. Under those authorities, 1,226 sponsor organizations facilitate the entry of more than 300,000 exchange participants each year. The Fulbright-Hays Act is the organic legislation underpinning the entire Exchange Visitor Program. Section 101 of that Act sets forth the purpose of the Act, viz., ‘‘to enable the Government of the United States to increase mutual understanding between the people of the United States and the people of other countries by means of educational and cultural exchange * * * .’’ The Act authorizes the President to provide for PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4702 Proposed Sfmt 4702 $2,700.00 233.00 Increase/Decrease $952 ¥$13 such exchanges when he considers that it would strengthen international cooperative relations. The language of the Act and its legislative history make it clear that Congress considered international educational and cultural exchanges to be a significant part of the public diplomacy efforts of the President in connection with his Constitutional prerogatives in conducting foreign affairs. On September 27, 1999, the United States Information Agency (USIA) issued an interim final rule on the adoption of fees for all requests for an E:\FR\FM\01OCP1.SGM 01OCP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 190 (Friday, October 1, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 60671-60674]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24563]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

19 CFR Part 210


Rules of Adjudication and Enforcement

AGENCY: International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The United States International Trade Commission 
(``Commission'') proposes to amend its Rules of Practice and Procedure 
concerning rules of general application, adjudication, and enforcement. 
The amendments are necessary to gather more information on public 
interest issues arising from complaints filed with the Commission 
requesting institution of an investigation under section 337 of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337. The intended effect of 
the proposed amendments is to aid the Commission in identifying 
investigations that require further development of public interest 
issues in the record, and to identify and develop information regarding 
the public interest at each stage of the investigation.

DATES: To be assured of consideration, written comments must be 
received by 5:15 p.m. on November 30, 2010.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number MISC-
032, by any of the following methods:

--Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 
instructions for submitting comments.
--Agency Web Site: https://www.usitc.gov. Follow the instructions for 
submitting comments on the web site at https://www.usitc.gov/secretary/edis.htm.
--E-mail: james.worth@usitc.gov. Include docket number MISC-032 in the 
subject line of the message.
--Mail: For paper submission. U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 
E Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC 20436.
--Hand Delivery/Courier: U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E 
Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC 20436. From the hours of 8:45 
a.m. to 5:15 p.m.

    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name 
and docket number (MISC-032), along with a cover letter stating the 
nature of the commenter's interest in the proposed rulemaking. All 
comments received will be posted without change to https://www.usitc.gov, including any personal information provided. For paper 
copies, a signed original and 14 copies of each set of comments should 
be submitted to Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary, U.S. International Trade 
Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC 20436.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or 
comments received, go to https://www.usitc.gov and/or the U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112, 
Washington, DC 20436.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Worth, telephone 202-205-3065, 
or Megan Valentine, telephone, 202-708-2301, Office of the General 
Counsel, United States International Trade Commission. Hearing-impaired 
individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained 
by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal at 202-205-1810. General 
information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing 
its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.

[[Page 60672]]


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The preamble below is designed to assist 
readers in understanding these proposed amendments to the Commission 
Rules. This preamble provides background information, a regulatory 
analysis of the proposed amendments, a section-by-section explanation 
of the proposed amendments to part 210, and a description of the 
proposed amendments to the rules. The Commission encourages members of 
the public to comment, in addition to any other comments they wish to 
make on the proposed amendments, on whether the language of the 
proposed amendments is sufficiently clear for users to understand.
    If the Commission decides to proceed with this rulemaking after 
reviewing the comments filed in response to this notice, the proposed 
rule revisions will be promulgated in accordance with the applicable 
requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act (``APA'') (5 U.S.C. 
553), and will be codified in 19 CFR part 210.

Background

    Section 335 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1335) authorizes 
the Commission to adopt such reasonable procedures, rules, and 
regulations as it deems necessary to carry out its functions and 
duties. This rulemaking seeks to improve provisions of the Commission's 
existing Rules of Practice and Procedure. The Commission proposes 
amendments to its rules covering investigations under section 337 of 
the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) (``section 337'') in order to 
increase the efficiency of its section 337 investigations.
    This rulemaking effort began in 2010, as part of an effort to 
gather information on the public interest at an earlier stage in the 
investigation, and to aid the Commission in determining when to 
delegate part of the development of the record on the public interest 
to the administrative law judge. The Commission invites the public to 
comment on all of these proposed rules amendments. In any comments, 
please consider addressing whether the language of the proposed 
amendments is sufficiently clear for users to understand. In addition 
please consider addressing how the proposed rules amendments could be 
improved, and/or offering specific constructive alternatives where 
appropriate.
    Consistent with its ordinary practice, the Commission is issuing 
these proposed amendments in accordance with the applicable 
requirements of section 553 of the APA. This procedure entails the 
following steps: (1) Publication of a notice of proposed rulemaking; 
(2) solicitation of public comments on the proposed amendments; (3) 
Commission review of public comments on the proposed amendments; and 
(4) publication of final amendments at least thirty days prior to their 
effective date.

Regulatory Analysis of Proposed Amendments to the Commission's Rules

    The Commission has determined that the final rules do not meet the 
criteria described in section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 
51735, Oct. 4, 1993) and thus do not constitute a significant 
regulatory action for purposes of the Executive Order.
    The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) is 
inapplicable to this rulemaking because it is not one for which a 
notice of final rulemaking is required under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) or any 
other statute. Although the Commission has chosen to publish a notice 
of proposed rulemaking, these proposed regulations are ``agency rules 
of procedure and practice,'' and thus are exempt from the notice 
requirement imposed by 5 U.S.C. 553(b).
    These proposed rules do not contain federalism implications 
warranting the preparation of a federalism summary impact statement 
pursuant to Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, Aug. 4, 1999).
    No actions are necessary under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 
1995 (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.) because the proposed rules will not result 
in the expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the 
aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100,000,000 or more in any one 
year, and will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments.
    The proposed rules are not major rules as defined by section 804 of 
the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (5 
U.S.C. 801 et seq.). Moreover, they are exempt from the reporting 
requirements of the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996 (Pub. 
L. 104-121) because they concern rules of agency organization, 
procedure, or practice that do not substantially affect the rights or 
obligations of non-agency parties.
    The amendments are not subject to section 3504(h) of the Paperwork 
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), because it is part of an 
administrative action or investigation against specific individuals or 
entities. 44 U.S.C. 3518(c)(1)(B)(ii).

Subpart C--Pleadings

Sections 210.12 and 210.13
    Section 210.12 generally provides the requirements for a complaint, 
and Sec.  210.13 generally provides requirements for responses to the 
complaint. To obtain information from the complainant on the existence 
and nature of any public interest issues raised by the complaint at the 
time of its filing, the Commission proposes adding a paragraph (a)(12) 
to Sec.  210.12 to require that the complainant provide in the 
complaint specific information regarding any public interest issues 
arising from the complaint. The complaint should address how issuance 
of an exclusion order and/or a cease and desist order in this 
investigation could affect the public health and welfare in the United 
States, competitive conditions in the United States economy, the 
production of like or directly competitive articles in the United 
States, or United States consumers. In particular, the complaint 
should:
     Explain how the articles potentially subject to the orders 
are used in the United States;
     Identify any public health, safety, or welfare concerns in 
the United States relating to the potential orders;
     Indicate the extent to which like or directly competitive 
articles are produced in the United States or are otherwise available 
in the United States, with respect to the articles potentially subject 
to the orders; and
     Indicate whether Complainant, Complainant's licensees, 
and/or third party suppliers have the capacity to replace the volume of 
articles potentially subject to an exclusion order and a cease and 
desist order within a commercially reasonable time.

The Commission further proposes adding a paragraph (k) to Sec.  210.12 
to provide that, when a complaint is filed, the Secretary to the 
Commission will publish a notice in the Federal Register soliciting 
comments from the public and/or the proposed respondents on any public 
interest issues arising from the complaint.

    Similarly, to obtain information from respondents on the existence 
and nature of any public interest issues arising from the complaint at 
the time of the response to the complaint, the Commission proposes 
adding a new paragraph (b)(4) to Sec.  210.13(b) to require the 
respondents to respond to the public interest issues raised by the 
complaint. Respondents may also address any comments received from the 
public with respect to the public interest.

[[Page 60673]]

Subpart G--Determinations and Actions Taken

Sections 210.50
    Section 210.50 provides that the Commission, in the event of a 
violation of section 337, shall consider the appropriateness of an 
exclusion order or a cease and desist order in light of the public 
interest factors; the Commission must also determine whether, and in 
what amount, bonding is appropriate. Thus, in the event of a violation 
of section 337, it is the responsibility of the Commission to make 
determinations regarding remedy, the public interest, and bonding. 
Section 210.50(a)(4) provides that the Commission may receive 
submissions from the parties and the public on these issues. Section 
210.50(b)(1) provides that the administrative law judge shall take 
evidence with respect to the issues of remedy and bonding, but not with 
respect to the public interest unless the Commission orders otherwise. 
The Commission proposes to amended Sec.  210.50(b)(1) to also provide 
that if the Commission orders the administrative law judge to take 
evidence on the public interest, the administrative judge shall address 
the public interest in the recommended determination under Sec.  
210.42(a)(1)(ii) and that the extent of the taking of discovery by the 
parties shall be at the discretion of the presiding administrative law 
judge. The Commission proposes to add language to Sec.  210.50(a)(4) to 
provide that, after the service of the recommended determination on 
remedy by the presiding administrative law judge, the parties are 
instructed to submit to the Commission within 30 days any information 
relating to the public interest, including any updates to the 
information provided in the complaint and response as required by the 
proposed amendments to Sec. Sec.  210.12 and 210.13.

List of Subjects in 19 CFR Part 210

    Administrative practice and procedure, Business and industry, 
Customs duties and inspection, Imports, Investigations.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, the United States 
International Trade Commission proposes to amend 19 CFR part 210 as 
follows:

PART 210--ADJUDICATION AND ENFORCEMENT

    1. The authority citation for part 210 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 19 U.S.C. 1333, 1335, and 1337.

Subpart C--Pleadings

    2. Amend Sec.  210.12 by adding paragraphs (a)(12) and (k) to read 
as follows:


Sec.  210.12  The complaint.

    (a) * * *
    (12) Provide specific information regarding the public interest. 
Address how issuance of an exclusion order and/or a cease and desist 
order in this investigation could affect the public health and welfare 
in the United States, competitive conditions in the United States 
economy, the production of like or directly competitive articles in the 
United States, or United States consumers. In particular,
    (i) Explain how the articles potentially subject to the orders are 
used in the United States;
    (ii) Identify any public health, safety, or welfare concerns in the 
United States relating to the potential orders;
    (iii) Indicate the extent to which like or directly competitive 
articles are produced in the United States or are otherwise available 
in the United States, with respect to the articles potentially subject 
to the orders; and
    (iv) Indicate whether Complainant, Complainant's licensees, and/or 
third party suppliers have the capacity to replace the volume of 
articles potentially subject to an exclusion order and a cease and 
desist order within a commercially reasonable time.
* * * * *
    Publication of notice of filing. When a complaint is filed, the 
Secretary to the Commission will publish a notice in the Federal 
Register soliciting comments from the public and/or proposed 
respondents on any public interest issues arising from the complaint 
and potential exclusion and/or cease and desist orders. Members of the 
public and proposed respondents may provide specific information 
regarding the public interest in a written submission not to exceed 
five pages to the Secretary to the Commission within five days of 
publication of notice of the filing of a complaint. Members of the 
public and proposed respondents may address how issuance of an 
exclusion order and/or a cease and desist order in this investigation 
could affect the public health and welfare in the United States, 
competitive conditions in the United States economy, the production of 
like or directly competitive articles in the United States, or United 
States consumers. In particular, members of the public and proposed 
respondents may:
    (i) Explain how the articles potentially subject to the orders are 
used in the United States;
    (ii) Identify any public health, safety, or welfare concerns in the 
United States relating to the potential orders;
    (iii) Indicate the extent to which like or directly competitive 
articles are produced in the United States or are otherwise available 
in the United States, with respect to the articles potentially subject 
to the orders; and
    (iv) Indicate whether Complainant, Complainant's licensees, and/or 
third party suppliers have the capacity to replace the volume of 
articles potentially subject to an exclusion order and a cease and 
desist order within a commercially reasonable time.
    3. Amend Sec.  210.13 by adding a paragraph (b)(4) to read as 
follows:


Sec.  210.13  The response.

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    Provide additional information on the public interest, as well as 
respond to the issues raised by the complaint as set forth in Sec.  
210.12(a)(12). The response may also address any comments received from 
members of the public with respect to the public interest pursuant to 
Sec.  210.12(k).
* * * * *

Subpart G--Determinations and Actions Taken

    3. Amend Sec.  210.50 by revising paragraphs (a)(4) and (b)(1) to 
read as follows:


Sec.  210.50  Commission action, the public interest, and bonding by 
respondents.

* * * * *
    (a) * * *
    (4) Receive submissions from the parties, interested persons, and 
other Government agencies and departments with respect to the subject 
matter of paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2), and (a)(3) of this section. After 
a recommended determination on remedy is certified by the presiding 
administrative law judge, the parties are instructed to submit to the 
Commission, within 30 days from service of the recommended 
determination, any information relating to the public interest, 
including any updates to the information requested by Sec. Sec.  
210.12(a)(12) and 210.13(b)(4). Members of the public may also submit 
information with respect to the public interest.
    (b) * * *
    (1) With respect to an administrative law judge's ability to take 
evidence or other information and to hear arguments from the parties 
and other interested persons on the issues of appropriate

[[Page 60674]]

Commission action, the public interest, and bonding by the respondents 
for purposes of an initial determination on temporary relief, see 
Sec. Sec.  210.61, 210.62, and 210.66(a). For purposes of the 
recommended determination required by Sec.  210.42(a)(1)(ii), an 
administrative law judge shall take evidence or other information and 
hear arguments from the parties and other interested persons on the 
issues of appropriate Commission action and bonding by the respondents. 
Unless the Commission orders otherwise, an administrative law judge 
shall not take evidence on the issue of the public interest for 
purposes of the recommended determination under Sec.  210.42(a)(1)(ii). 
If the Commission orders the administrative law judge to take evidence 
with respect to the public interest, the extent of the taking of 
discovery by the parties shall be at the discretion of the presiding 
administrative law judge.
* * * * *

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: September 27, 2010.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-24563 Filed 9-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.