Proposed Collection, Comment Request, 57817-57819 [2010-23663]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 183 / Wednesday, September 22, 2010 / Notices
The Consent Decree may be examined
at the Office of the United States
Attorney for the Southern District of
Georgia, 100 Bull Street, 2nd Floor,
Savannah, Georgia 31401. During the
public comment period, the Consent
Decree may also be examined on the
following Department of Justice: https://
www.usdoj.gov/enrd/
Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the
Consent Decree may also be obtained by
mail from the Consent Decree Library,
P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of
Justice, Washington, DC 20044–7611, or
by faxing or e-mailing a request to Tonia
Fleetwood, tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov,
Fax No. (202) 514–0097, phone
confirmation number (202) 514–1547. In
requesting a copy from the Consent
Decree Library, please enclose a check
in the amount of $11.50 (25 cents per
page reproduction cost) payable to the
U.S. Treasury.
Maureen Katz,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental
Enforcement Section, Environment and
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2010–23604 Filed 9–21–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree
Under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act
Notice is hereby given that on
September 16, 2010, a proposed consent
decree in United States v. Hercules Inc.,
et al., Civil Action No. 10–412, was
lodged with the United States District
Court for the Western District of
Virginia.
In this action the United States sought
the performance of response actions or
the recovery of response costs incurred
by the United States at the Kim-Stan
Landfill Superfund Site (‘‘Site’’) near
Selma, in Alleghany County, Virginia.
The consent decree resolves the liability
of Hercules Inc.; Honeywell
International, Inc.; MeadWestvaco
Corp.; and MeadWestvaco Virginia
Corp; under Sections 106 and 107 of
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act (‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. 9606 & 9607,
with respect to the Site, subject to terms
and conditions set forth in the consent
decree. The proposed consent decree
would require defendants to pay,
collectively, $1.9 million in
reimbursement of response costs
incurred by the United States.
The Department of Justice will receive
for a period of thirty (30) days from the
date of this publication comments
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:32 Sep 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
relating to the consent decree.
Comments should be addressed to the
Assistant Attorney General,
Environment and Natural Resources
Division, and either e-mailed to
pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov or
mailed to P.O. Box 7611, U.S.
Department of Justice, Washington, DC
20044–7611, and should refer to United
States v. Hercules Inc., D.J. Ref. 90–11–
2–06916/2.
The consent decree may be examined
on the following Department of Justice
Web site, https://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/
Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the
consent decree may also be obtained by
mail from the Consent Decree Library,
P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of
Justice, Washington, DC 20044–7611 or
by faxing or e-mailing a request to Tonia
Fleetwood (tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov),
fax no. (202) 514–0097, phone
confirmation number (202) 514–1547. In
requesting a copy from the Consent
Decree Library, please enclose a check
in the amount of $6.00 (25 cents per
page reproduction cost) payable to the
U.S. Treasury or, if by e-mail or fax,
forward a check in that amount to the
Consent Decree Library at the stated
address.
Maureen Katz,
Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement
Section, Environment and Natural Resources
Division.
[FR Doc. 2010–23602 Filed 9–21–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Bureau of Labor Statistics
Proposed Collection, Comment
Request
ACTION:
Notice.
The Department of Labor, as
part of its continuing effort to reduce
paperwork and respondent burden,
conducts a pre-clearance consultation
program to provide the general public
and Federal agencies with an
opportunity to comment on proposed
and/or continuing collections of
information in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)]. This
program helps to ensure that requested
data can be provided in the desired
format, reporting burden (time and
financial resources) is minimized,
collection instruments are clearly
understood, and the impact of collection
requirements on respondents can be
properly assessed. The Bureau of Labor
Statistics (BLS) is soliciting comments
concerning the revision of the ‘‘The
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
57817
Consumer Expenditure Surveys: The
Quarterly Interview and the Diary.’’ A
copy of the proposed information
collection request (ICR) can be obtained
by contacting the individual listed
below in the ADDRESSES section of this
notice.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted to the office listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this notice on or
before November 22, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Nora
Kincaid, BLS Clearance Officer,
Division of Management Systems,
Bureau of Labor Statistics, Room 4080,
2 Massachusetts Avenue, NE.,
Washington, DC 20212. Written
comments also may be transmitted by
fax to 202–691–5111 (this is not a toll
free number).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nora Kincaid, BLS Clearance Officer, at
202–691–7628 (this is not a toll free
number). (See ADDRESSES section.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Consumer Expenditure (CE)
Surveys collect data on consumer
expenditures, demographic information,
and related data needed by the
Consumer Price Index (CPI) and other
public and private data users. The
continuing surveys provide a constant
measurement of changes in consumer
expenditure patterns for economic
analysis and to obtain data for future
CPI revisions. The CE Surveys have
been ongoing since 1979.
The data from the CE Surveys are
used (1) for CPI revisions, (2) to provide
a continuous flow of data on income
and expenditure patterns for use in
economic analysis and policy
formulation, and (3) to provide a
flexible consumer survey vehicle that is
available for use by other Federal
Government agencies. Public and
private users of price statistics,
including Congress and the economic
policymaking agencies of the Executive
branch, rely on data collected in the CPI
in their day-to-day activities. Hence,
data users and policymakers widely
accept the need to improve the process
used for revising the CPI. If the CE
Surveys were not conducted on a
continuing basis, current information
necessary for more timely, as well as
more accurate, updating of the CPI
would not be available. In addition, data
would not be available to respond to the
continuing demand from the public and
private sectors for current information
on consumer spending.
In the Quarterly Interview Survey,
each consumer unit (CU) in the sample
is interviewed every three months over
E:\FR\FM\22SEN1.SGM
22SEN1
57818
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 183 / Wednesday, September 22, 2010 / Notices
five calendar quarters. The sample for
each quarter is divided into three
panels, with CUs being interviewed
every three months in the same panel of
every quarter. The Quarterly Interview
Survey is designed to collect data on the
types of expenditures that respondents
can be expected to recall for a period of
three months or longer. In general the
expenses reported in the Interview
Survey are either relatively large, such
as property, automobiles, or major
appliances, or are expenses which occur
on a fairly regular basis, such as rent,
utility bills, or insurance premiums.
The Diary (or recordkeeping) Survey
is completed at home by the respondent
family for two consecutive one-week
periods. The primary objective of the
Diary Survey is to obtain expenditure
data on small, frequently purchased
items which normally are difficult to
recall over longer periods of time.
II. Current Action
Office of Management and Budget
clearance is being sought for the
Consumer Expenditure Surveys: The
Quarterly Interview and the Diary.
The continuing CE Surveys provide a
constant measurement of changes in
consumer expenditure patterns for
economic analysis and obtain data for
future CPI revisions.
The Consumer Expenditure Quarterly
Interview Survey has recently
undergone a thorough review. The
proposed changes from this review fall
into two major categories: Streamlining
the current questions in several sections
and updating several questions and
sections to reflect the current
marketplace. In the streamlining
category, the BLS deleted or collapsed
obsolete questions. For example,
previously clothing purchases were
asked separately for those over and
under two years old. These questions
were combined into one section for all
clothing purchases. Sewing products
were moved to ‘Miscellaneous
Expenditures’ after ‘arts and crafts.’
To keep the survey current and to
fulfill the requirements of the Consumer
Price Index (CPI), question wording
changed and new items were added. For
example, additional questions were
added to collect more detailed
information on whether rental payments
include services such as cable, Internet,
or household furnishings; and to
determine whether business properties
are residential or commercial. Changes
were made to keep the survey current
with products and services available in
the marketplace and to provide better
data for analytical purposes such as the
addition of electronic book readers.
Minor changes to the Diary CAPI
instrument are proposed for 2011. The
changes include minor updates to the
race and origin questions asked of each
Consumer Unit member.
In addition, the BLS proposes the
addition of a ‘‘research section’’ to the
CEQ CAPI instrument. This section will
be used to gather information from
respondents on a range of topics being
studied. The intent is that any particular
set of questions in this section will not
be asked for more than one year.
Initially this section will be used to
collect outlet data for five broad
categories of expenditures: Electronics,
music, clothing, restaurant food, and
groceries as well as one question on
whether or not the household has a
working landline phone. These data are
being collected by CE on behalf of the
CPI to aid in their research into bias in
the Telephone Point of Purchase Survey
(TPOPS), given that the TPOPS sample
consists of only landline telephone
numbers. Respondents will be asked a
maximum of twelve questions. These
questions will be asked for all
interviews for one calendar quarter of
data collection. This particular test is
Total
respondents
Form
not intended to determine the feasibility
of collecting outlet data in the CE
Interview survey on a long term basis.
A full list of the proposed changes to
the Quarterly Interview Survey and
Diary Survey are available upon request.
In addition to the TPOPS test, the
Consumer Expenditure program is
planning several tests over the next
several years in an effort to improve the
CE surveys in the areas of both data
quality and respondent burden.
III. Desired Focus of Comments
The Bureau of Labor Statistics is
particularly interested in comments
that:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility.
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used.
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected.
• Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submissions
of responses.
Type of Review: Revision.
Agency: Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Title: The Consumer Expenditure
Surveys: The Quarterly Interview and
the Diary.
OMB Number: 1220–0050.
Affected Public: Individuals or
Households.
Total
responses
Frequency
Average time
per response
(minutes)
Estimated total
burden
8,825
4,400
7,050
7,050
1,400
4
1
2
3
1
35,300
4400
14,100
21,150
1,400
60
10
105
25
10
35,300
733
24,675
8,813
233
Totals ............................................................................
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
CEQ—Interview ...................................................................
CEQ—Reinterview ...............................................................
CED—Diary (record-keeping) ..............................................
CED—Diary (Interview) ........................................................
CED—Diary (Reinterview) ...................................................
........................
........................
76,350
........................
69,754
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:32 Sep 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\22SEN1.SGM
22SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 183 / Wednesday, September 22, 2010 / Notices
Total Burden Cost (capital/startup):
$0.
Total Burden Cost (operating/
maintenance): $0.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for Office of
Management and Budget approval of the
information collection request; they also
will become a matter of public record.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 14th day of
September 2010.
Kimberley Hill,
Chief, Division of Management Systems,
Bureau of Labor Statistics.
[FR Doc. 2010–23663 Filed 9–21–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–24–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Notice of Revision; Notice of the
Advisory Committee on
Apprenticeship (ACA) Open Meeting
and New Members
Signed at Washington, DC, this 16th day of
September, 2010.
Jane Oates,
Assistant Secretary, Employment and
Training Administration.
Employment and Training
Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
[FR Doc. 2010–23613 Filed 9–21–10; 8:45 am]
On September 16, 2010, the
Employment and Training
Administration published a Notice
announcing an Open Meeting of the
Advisory Committee on Apprenticeship
(ACA) and identifying the members of
the Committee. 75 FR 56578. The title
and text of the notice mistakenly
included the phrase ‘‘Renewal of the
Advisory Committee on Apprenticeship
(ACA)’’ which may have inadvertently
confused the intention of the notice. We
are publishing a Notice of revision today
to clarify that the Committee and its
Charter have not been renewed; the
current members were appointed, and
the meeting is being conducted, under
the 2009 ACA Charter.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
V. Ladd, Administrator, Office of
Apprenticeship, ETA, U.S. Department
of Labor, Room N–5311, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC Telephone: (202) 693–2796 (this is
not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
September 16, 2010, the Employment
and Training Administration published
a Notice announcing an Open Meeting
of the Advisory Committee on
Apprenticeship (ACA) and identifying
the members of the Committee. 75 FR
56578. The title and summary of the
notice mistakenly included the word
renewal which may have inadvertently
confused the intention of the notice.
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:32 Sep 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
The title of the notice published on
September 16, 2010 should have read:
‘‘Notice of the Advisory Committee on
Apprenticeship (ACA), Members and an
Open Meeting. The use of the word
Renewal in the title and in the Summary
of the Notice should not be read to
imply that the Committee Charter has
been recently renewed. The current
2009 ACA charter remains in effect and
is not being renewed at this time. We
are publishing a Notice of revision today
to clarify that the Committee and its
Charter have not been renewed; the
current members were appointed, and
the meeting is being conducted, under
the 2009 ACA Charter.
Consistent with the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (FACA) requirement to
publish a timely notice of the ACA
meeting, the September 16, 2010
Federal Register Notice, as clarified by
this notice of clarification, serve as
public notice of the open meeting being
held on October 27–28, 2010.
BILLING CODE 4510–FR–P
NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS
ADMINISTRATION
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
NARA is giving public notice
that the agency has submitted to OMB
for approval the information collection
described in this notice. The public is
invited to comment on the proposed
information collections pursuant to the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted to OMB at the address below
on or before October 22, 2010 to be
assured of consideration.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Mr.
Nicholas A. Fraser, Desk Officer for
NARA, Office of Management and
Budget, New Executive Office Building,
Washington, DC 20503; fax: 202–395–
5167; or electronically mailed to
Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the proposed information
collection and supporting statement
should be directed to Tamee Fechhelm
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
57819
at telephone number 301–837–1694 or
fax number 301–713–7409.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–13), NARA invites the
general public and other Federal
agencies to comment on proposed
information collections. NARA
published a notice of proposed
collection for this information collection
on June 24, 2010 (75 FR 36122 and
36123). No comments were received.
NARA has submitted the described
information collection to OMB for
approval.
In response to this notice, comments
and suggestions should address one or
more of the following points: (a)
Whether the proposed information
collection is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of NARA;
(b) the accuracy of NARA’s estimate of
the burden of the proposed information
collection; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including the use of
information technology; and (e) whether
small businesses are affected by this
collection. In this notice, NARA is
soliciting comments concerning the
following information collection:
Title: OGIS Request for Assistance
and Consent.
OMB number: 3095–00XX.
Agency form number: NA Forms
10003 and 10004.
Type of review: Regular.
Affected public: Individuals or
households, Business or other for-profit,
Not-for-profit institutions, and Federal
Government.
Estimated number of respondents:
600.
Estimated time per response: 1
minute.
Frequency of response: On occasion.
Estimated total annual burden hours:
10 hours.
Abstract: In order to fulfill its
government-wide statutory mission,
OGIS provides varying types of
assistance to its customers, which
requires communicating with
government departments and agencies
regarding the customers’ FOIA/Privacy
Act request/appeal. Handling requests
for OGIS assistance must conform to the
legal requirements of the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) and the Privacy
Act of 1974. Authority for the
requirements set forth in these forms is
also contained in 5 U.S.C. 552a(b). OGIS
will use the information submitted in
the proposed forms to provide the
requested assistance. Without the
E:\FR\FM\22SEN1.SGM
22SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 183 (Wednesday, September 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57817-57819]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23663]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Bureau of Labor Statistics
Proposed Collection, Comment Request
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Labor, as part of its continuing effort to
reduce paperwork and respondent burden, conducts a pre-clearance
consultation program to provide the general public and Federal agencies
with an opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing
collections of information in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)]. This program helps to
ensure that requested data can be provided in the desired format,
reporting burden (time and financial resources) is minimized,
collection instruments are clearly understood, and the impact of
collection requirements on respondents can be properly assessed. The
Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) is soliciting comments concerning the
revision of the ``The Consumer Expenditure Surveys: The Quarterly
Interview and the Diary.'' A copy of the proposed information
collection request (ICR) can be obtained by contacting the individual
listed below in the ADDRESSES section of this notice.
DATES: Written comments must be submitted to the office listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this notice on or before November 22, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Nora Kincaid, BLS Clearance Officer,
Division of Management Systems, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Room 4080,
2 Massachusetts Avenue, NE., Washington, DC 20212. Written comments
also may be transmitted by fax to 202-691-5111 (this is not a toll free
number).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nora Kincaid, BLS Clearance Officer,
at 202-691-7628 (this is not a toll free number). (See ADDRESSES
section.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Consumer Expenditure (CE) Surveys collect data on consumer
expenditures, demographic information, and related data needed by the
Consumer Price Index (CPI) and other public and private data users. The
continuing surveys provide a constant measurement of changes in
consumer expenditure patterns for economic analysis and to obtain data
for future CPI revisions. The CE Surveys have been ongoing since 1979.
The data from the CE Surveys are used (1) for CPI revisions, (2) to
provide a continuous flow of data on income and expenditure patterns
for use in economic analysis and policy formulation, and (3) to provide
a flexible consumer survey vehicle that is available for use by other
Federal Government agencies. Public and private users of price
statistics, including Congress and the economic policymaking agencies
of the Executive branch, rely on data collected in the CPI in their
day-to-day activities. Hence, data users and policymakers widely accept
the need to improve the process used for revising the CPI. If the CE
Surveys were not conducted on a continuing basis, current information
necessary for more timely, as well as more accurate, updating of the
CPI would not be available. In addition, data would not be available to
respond to the continuing demand from the public and private sectors
for current information on consumer spending.
In the Quarterly Interview Survey, each consumer unit (CU) in the
sample is interviewed every three months over
[[Page 57818]]
five calendar quarters. The sample for each quarter is divided into
three panels, with CUs being interviewed every three months in the same
panel of every quarter. The Quarterly Interview Survey is designed to
collect data on the types of expenditures that respondents can be
expected to recall for a period of three months or longer. In general
the expenses reported in the Interview Survey are either relatively
large, such as property, automobiles, or major appliances, or are
expenses which occur on a fairly regular basis, such as rent, utility
bills, or insurance premiums.
The Diary (or recordkeeping) Survey is completed at home by the
respondent family for two consecutive one-week periods. The primary
objective of the Diary Survey is to obtain expenditure data on small,
frequently purchased items which normally are difficult to recall over
longer periods of time.
II. Current Action
Office of Management and Budget clearance is being sought for the
Consumer Expenditure Surveys: The Quarterly Interview and the Diary.
The continuing CE Surveys provide a constant measurement of changes
in consumer expenditure patterns for economic analysis and obtain data
for future CPI revisions.
The Consumer Expenditure Quarterly Interview Survey has recently
undergone a thorough review. The proposed changes from this review fall
into two major categories: Streamlining the current questions in
several sections and updating several questions and sections to reflect
the current marketplace. In the streamlining category, the BLS deleted
or collapsed obsolete questions. For example, previously clothing
purchases were asked separately for those over and under two years old.
These questions were combined into one section for all clothing
purchases. Sewing products were moved to `Miscellaneous Expenditures'
after `arts and crafts.'
To keep the survey current and to fulfill the requirements of the
Consumer Price Index (CPI), question wording changed and new items were
added. For example, additional questions were added to collect more
detailed information on whether rental payments include services such
as cable, Internet, or household furnishings; and to determine whether
business properties are residential or commercial. Changes were made to
keep the survey current with products and services available in the
marketplace and to provide better data for analytical purposes such as
the addition of electronic book readers.
Minor changes to the Diary CAPI instrument are proposed for 2011.
The changes include minor updates to the race and origin questions
asked of each Consumer Unit member.
In addition, the BLS proposes the addition of a ``research
section'' to the CEQ CAPI instrument. This section will be used to
gather information from respondents on a range of topics being studied.
The intent is that any particular set of questions in this section will
not be asked for more than one year. Initially this section will be
used to collect outlet data for five broad categories of expenditures:
Electronics, music, clothing, restaurant food, and groceries as well as
one question on whether or not the household has a working landline
phone. These data are being collected by CE on behalf of the CPI to aid
in their research into bias in the Telephone Point of Purchase Survey
(TPOPS), given that the TPOPS sample consists of only landline
telephone numbers. Respondents will be asked a maximum of twelve
questions. These questions will be asked for all interviews for one
calendar quarter of data collection. This particular test is not
intended to determine the feasibility of collecting outlet data in the
CE Interview survey on a long term basis.
A full list of the proposed changes to the Quarterly Interview
Survey and Diary Survey are available upon request.
In addition to the TPOPS test, the Consumer Expenditure program is
planning several tests over the next several years in an effort to
improve the CE surveys in the areas of both data quality and respondent
burden.
III. Desired Focus of Comments
The Bureau of Labor Statistics is particularly interested in
comments that:
Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility.
Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used.
Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected.
Minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submissions of responses.
Type of Review: Revision.
Agency: Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Title: The Consumer Expenditure Surveys: The Quarterly Interview
and the Diary.
OMB Number: 1220-0050.
Affected Public: Individuals or Households.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average time
Form Total Frequency Total per response Estimated
respondents responses (minutes) total burden
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CEQ--Interview.................. 8,825 4 35,300 60 35,300
CEQ--Reinterview................ 4,400 1 4400 10 733
CED--Diary (record-keeping)..... 7,050 2 14,100 105 24,675
CED--Diary (Interview).......... 7,050 3 21,150 25 8,813
CED--Diary (Reinterview)........ 1,400 1 1,400 10 233
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Totals...................... .............. .............. 76,350 .............. 69,754
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 57819]]
Total Burden Cost (capital/startup): $0.
Total Burden Cost (operating/maintenance): $0.
Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized
and/or included in the request for Office of Management and Budget
approval of the information collection request; they also will become a
matter of public record.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 14th day of September 2010.
Kimberley Hill,
Chief, Division of Management Systems, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
[FR Doc. 2010-23663 Filed 9-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-24-P