Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance, 57514-57517 [2010-23496]

Download as PDF srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES 57514 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 21, 2010 / Notices One comment stated that determining green job occupations based on OES assumes that green jobs are distributed throughout the workforce in the same proportion by occupation as all jobs. The commenter stated that results of their State survey indicated that green jobs seem to be widely disbursed, but are more concentrated in construction and extraction, production, and farming and fishing occupations. BLS responds that occupational employment will be estimated using OES data for specific establishments, according to whether or not they produce green goods or services. This is different from using OES estimates for overall employment. Two comments concerned the BLS plan to count jobs in all occupations in the establishment in the green goods and services survey, with one comment agreeing and one comment saying there is ‘‘no need to count support jobs, such as accountants or administrative staff, because their job duties are not affected directly by the green product or service and thus they do not require additional training.’’ BLS notes that its green jobs definition is not based on skill differences, but instead on the environmental impact of the good or service produced or the production process used. However, data users can select the occupations they wish to consider for training offerings from those BLS identifies as occurring in establishments producing green goods and services. The O*NET green occupations taxonomy should be useful in this type of analysis. Data by public ownership. One comment encouraged BLS to generate data that identify the level of public sector green employment in the NAICSdefined industries and the characteristics of the public sector green jobs. BLS responds that it intends to provide data from the green goods and services survey by public versus private ownership. Process approach to measuring green jobs. BLS plans to develop a special employer survey to test the feasibility of collecting data on jobs associated with use of environmentally friendly production processes. Environmentally friendly production processes and practices are those that reduce the environmental or natural resources impact resulting from production of any good or service. These production processes include (1) production of green goods and services for use within the establishment, and (2) use of technologies and practices that have a positive environmental or natural resources conservation impact. Sixteen comments addressed the process approach. Five comments VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:02 Sep 20, 2010 Jkt 220001 supported using this approach and one comment recommended against. Three of these comments emphasized that all industries should be included in the process survey. BLS responds that, as stated in the March 16, 2010, notice, the scope of the process survey will be all industries. Six comments indicated the need for more clarity in the process approach. BLS responds that the approach is under development and will be described in a future notice. Two comments recommended using product life-cycle criteria for identifying green goods, with one of these comments suggesting that ‘‘a ‘green good’ and a good produced with ‘green processes’ will become increasingly indistinguishable in the marketplace among the leading experts and stakeholders in the sustainable products field.’’ BLS responds that applying lifecycle criteria or identifying ‘‘sustainable’’ products is not feasible in its data collection. Signed at Washington, DC, this 26th day of August 2010. Kimberley Hill, Chief, Division of Management Systems, Bureau of Labor Statistics. [FR Doc. 2010–23485 Filed 9–20–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–24–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers by (TA–W) number issued during the period of August 30, 2010 through September 3, 2010. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met. I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the following must be satisfied: (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; PO 00000 Frm 00078 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 (2) The sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased absolutely; and (3) One of the following must be satisfied: (A) Imports of articles or services like or directly competitive with articles produced or services supplied by such firm have increased; (B) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are directly incorporated, have increased; (C) Imports of articles directly incorporating one or more component parts produced outside the United States that are like or directly competitive with imports of articles incorporating one or more component parts produced by such firm have increased; (D) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles which are produced directly using services supplied by such firm, have increased; and (4) The increase in imports contributed importantly to such workers’ separation or threat of separation and to the decline in the sales or production of such firm; or II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the following must be satisfied: (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) One of the following must be satisfied: (A) there has been a shift by the workers’ firm to a foreign country in the production of articles or supply of services like or directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; (B) there has been an acquisition from a foreign country by the workers’ firm of articles/services that are like or directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; and (3) The shift/acquisition contributed importantly to the workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected workers in public agencies and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must be met. (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the public agency have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM 21SEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 21, 2010 / Notices (2) The public agency has acquired from a foreign country services like or directly competitive with services which are supplied by such agency; and (3) The acquisition of services contributed importantly to such workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected secondary workers of a firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(c) of the Act must be met. (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers’ firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The workers’ firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, and such supply or production is related to the article or service that was the basis for such certification; and (3) Either— (A) the workers’ firm is a supplier and the component parts it supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the workers’ firm; or (B) a loss of business by the workers’ firm with the firm described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected workers in firms identified by the International Trade Commission and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(f) of the Act must be met. (1) The workers’ firm is publicly identified by name by the International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an investigation resulting in— (A) An affirmative determination of serious injury or threat thereof under section 202(b)(1); (B) An affirmative determination of market disruption or threat thereof under section 421(b)(1); or (C) An affirmative final determination of material injury or threat thereof under section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A)); (2) The petition is filed during the 1year period beginning on the date on which— 57515 (A) a summary of the report submitted to the President by the International Trade Commission under section 202(f)(1) with respect to the affirmative determination described in paragraph (1)(A) is published in the Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); or (B) notice of an affirmative determination described in subparagraph (1) is published in the Federal Register; and (3) The workers have become totally or partially separated from the workers’ firm within— (A) the 1-year period described in paragraph (2); or (B) notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the 1-year period preceding the 1-year period described in paragraph (2). Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance The following certifications have been issued. The date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determination. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W No. Subject firm Location 72,531 .................................... 73,656 .................................... Riley Power, Inc., Vogt-Nem, Inc. and Babcock Power, Inc JK Products and Services, Inc., Leased Workers Aid Temporary Services, Inc., Staffmark, and Appleone, etc. Angell-Demmel North America Corp, Sellner Corporation .. Babcock Lumber Company, Hardwood Division; leased Workers Staff Right Services, etc. Reynoldsville Holding Company ........................................... Mason County Forest Products ............................................ Westcode, Inc ....................................................................... Brockway Mould, Inc., Ross Mould, Inc ............................... Shipbuilders of Wisconsin, Inc., Burger Boat Company; Leased Workers Aerotek and Skilled Trade Services. DuPont Teijin Films, Leased Workers from Schenkers Logistics, Inc. Erie, PA ................................. Jonesboro, AR ...................... October 2, 2008. March 5, 2009. Dayton, OH ........................... St. Marys, PA ........................ April 9, 2009. April 23, 2009. Reynoldsville, PA .................. Shelton, WA .......................... Binghamton, NY .................... Brockport, PA ........................ Manitowoc, WI ...................... May 10, 2009. June 14, 2009. June 21, 2009. June 25, 2010. June 8, 2009. Florence, SC ......................... November 7, 2009. 73,965 .................................... 74,025 .................................... 74,134 74,267 74,277 74,307 74,384 .................................... .................................... .................................... .................................... .................................... 74,534 .................................... The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or Impact date services) of the Trade Act have been met. Subject firm Location 73,547 ................................... srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES TA–W No. Acxiom Corporation, Leased Workers from CJCN, Kyntex, Premier Staffing, Quintex, etc. Acxiom Corporation, Leased Workers from CJCN, Kyntex, Premier Staffing, Quintex, etc. PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP (‘PwC’), Internal Firm Services (‘IFS’) Group. Suncor Energy (U.S.A.), Inc., A Subsidiary of Suncor Energy, Inc. ITT Water & Wastewater Leopold, Inc., ITT Corporation; Leased Workers Account Temps, Kelly Services, Adecco, etc. Little Rock, AR ...................... February 22, 2009. Conway, AR .......................... February 22, 2009. Charlotte, NC ........................ February 26, 2009. Greenwood Village, CO ........ March 11, 2009. Zelienople, PA ...................... May 22, 2010. 73,547A ................................. 73,608 ................................... 73,829 ................................... 73,887 ................................... VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:02 Sep 20, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00079 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM 21SEN1 Impact date 57516 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 21, 2010 / Notices TA–W No. Subject firm Location 74,008 ................................... West Melbourne, FL ............. April 22, 2009. Romney, WV ........................ Green Bay, WI ...................... April 28, 2009. May 7, 2009. Lenoir, NC ............................ Austin, TX ............................. May 13, 2009. May 13, 2009. Schaumburg, IL .................... May 21, 2009. Culver City, CA ..................... June 28, 2009. Cleveland, OH ...................... July 13, 2009. Fort Collins, CO .................... Fostoria, OH ......................... East Windsor, CT ................. July 22, 2009. July 26, 2009. August 3, 2009. Unadilla, GA ......................... Galion, OH ............................ August 9, 2009. July 27, 2009. Fort Worth, TX ...................... August 5, 2009. 74,530 ................................... Cooper, Crouse-Hinds MTL, Inc., Cooper, Crouse-Hinds; Cooper Industries; Leased Workers from Accountemps, etc. Imhauser Corporation .......................................................... ShopKo Stores Operating Co., LLC, Information Services Division; SKO Group Holding, LLC; Leased Workers, etc. Avery Dennison, Leased Workers from Adecco, Inc .......... Unisys Corporation, Managed Service Center; Leased Workers from Apex Systems and Pinnacle. World Color Mt. Morris, IL LLC, Premedia Chicago Division; Leased Workers from The Creative Group, etc. Sony Pictures Entertainment, IT Department, Leased Workers from Banctec, CCP Global, Invision, etc. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Internal Firm Services Group. LSI Corporation, Integrated Circuit Testing Department ..... Uniboard Fostoria, Inc., Uniboard Canada .......................... Wood Group Component Repair Services, Inc., Wood Group Gas Turbine Services, Inc. Neff Motivation, Inc., Visant Corporation ............................. Peco II by Lineage Power, Leased Workers from Waycraft, Incorporated. TD Ameritrade, Inc., TD Ameritrade Clearing, Inc.; TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation etc. Hewlett Packard Company, Human Resources Division .... August 4, 2009. 74,530A ................................. 74,530B ................................. 74,530C ................................ 74,530D ................................ 74,530E ................................. 74,530F ................................. 74,530G ................................ Hewlett Hewlett Hewlett Hewlett Hewlett Hewlett Hewlett 74,530H ................................ 74,530I .................................. 74,545 ................................... Hewlett Packard Company, Human Resources Division .... Hewlett Packard Company, Human Resources Division .... HAVI Logistics, North America, HAVI Group, LP; Leased Worker from Express Personnel Services, etc. Artisans, Inc ......................................................................... CKE Restaurants, Inc., Client Services Division; Leased Workers from B2B Staffing Services. Hilton Reservations and Customer Care, Hemet Division of Hilton Worldwide. Auburn and other Cities in California, CA. Boise, ID ............................... Ellicott City, MD .................... Canton, MI ............................ Wake Forest, NC .................. Corvallis, OR ........................ Blue Bell, PA ........................ Houston and other Cities in Texas, TX. Herndon, VA ......................... Vancouver, WA ..................... Bloomingdale, IL ................... 74,028 ................................... 74,065 ................................... 74,085 ................................... 74,086 ................................... 74,142 ................................... 74,377 ................................... 74,414 ................................... 74,454 ................................... 74,455 ................................... 74,483 ................................... 74,505 ................................... 74,518 ................................... 74,524 ................................... 74,550 ................................... 74,552 ................................... 74,561 ................................... Packard Packard Packard Packard Packard Packard Packard The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(c) (supplier to a firm whose workers Company, Company, Company, Company, Company, Company, Company, Human Human Human Human Human Human Human Resources Resources Resources Resources Resources Resources Resources Division Division Division Division Division Division Division .... .... .... .... .... .... .... Impact date August August August August August August August 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 2009. 2009. 2009. 2009. 2009. 2009 2009. August 4, 2009. August 4, 2009. August 11, 2009. Glen Flora, WI ...................... Anaheim, CA ........................ August 20, 2009. August 18, 2009. Hemet, CA ............................ August 11, 2009. are certified eligible to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 73,203 ................................... Hitachi Automotive Products (USA), Inc., Hitachi America, Ltd.; Leased Workers from Nesco Resource Company. Ethan Allen Retail, Inc ......................................................... Guardian Automotive Corp., SRG Global Inc ..................... General Electric Company, Transportation Division; Leased Workers from Adecco Technical. Harrodsburg, KY ................... December 31, 2009. Lombard, IL .......................... LaGrange, GA ...................... Grove City, PA ...................... February 10, 2009. March 27, 2009. August 3, 2009. 73,486 ................................... 73,496 ................................... 74,495 ................................... srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met for the reasons specified. The investigation revealed that the criteria under paragraphs(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services to a foreign country) of section 222 have not been met. TA–W No. Subject firm Location 73,021 ................................... 73,721 ................................... BJ Services, A Baker Hughes Incorporated Company ....... RCL Burco, Inc., RCL Services Group, LLC ....................... Eldorado, TX ......................... Culloden, WV ........................ VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:02 Sep 20, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00080 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM 21SEN1 Impact date Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 21, 2010 / Notices TA–W No. Subject firm Location 73,722 ................................... Sojitz Corporation of America, Sojitz Corporation; Forest Products Department. OSRAM Sylvania, Siemens ................................................. Bank of America, Card Customer Assistance Division ....... Supermedia LLC, Idearc Media LLC; SuperMedia Information Services LLC; Client Care, etc.. Seattle, WA ........................... 74,035 ................................... 74,246 ................................... 74,290 ................................... Determinations Terminating Investigations of Petitions for Worker Adjustment Assistance Impact date Warren, PA ........................... State College, PA ................. Middleton, MA ....................... on the Department’s Web site, as required by Section 221 of the Act (19 U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated investigations of these petitions. After notice of the petitions was published in the Federal Register and The following determinations terminating investigations were issued because the petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. TA–W No. Subject firm Location 73,707 ................................... 73,759 ................................... 74,353 ................................... JD Norman Industries, Inc., Brooklyn Facility ..................... Eskco, Inc ............................................................................ Riverhawk Aviation .............................................................. Brooklyn, OH ........................ Dayton, OH ........................... Hickory, NC .......................... The following determinations terminating investigations were issued because the petitioning groups of workers are covered by active certifications. Consequently, further investigation in these cases would serve Impact date no purpose since the petitioning group of workers cannot be covered by more than one certification at a time. TA–W No. Subject firm Location 73,625 ................................... Compuware Corporation ...................................................... Warren, MI ............................ I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued during the period of August 30, 2010 through September 3, 2010. Copies of these determinations may be requested under the Freedom of Information Act. Requests may be submitted by fax, courier services, or mail to FOIA Disclosure Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance (ETA), U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 or tofoiarequest@dol.gov. These determinations also are available on the Department’s Web site at https://www.doleta.gov/tradeact under the searchable listing of determinations. Dated: September 10, 2010. Elliott S. Kushner Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 2010–23496 Filed 9–20–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES 57517 VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:02 Sep 20, 2010 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–70,344] Atlantic Southeast Airlines, a Subsidiary of Skywest, Inc., Airport Customer Service Division, Including On-Site Leased Workers of Delta Global Services, Inc., Fort Smith, AR; Notice of Negative Determination on Remand On July 6, 2010, the United States Court of International Trade (USCIT) granted the Department of Labor’s request for voluntary remand to conduct further investigation in Former Employees of Atlantic Southeast Airlines, a Subsidiary of Skywest, Inc., Airport Customer Service Division v. United States Secretary of Labor (Court No. 09–00522). Background On September 28, 2009, the Department of Labor (Department) issued a Negative Determination regarding eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) under the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (hereafter referred to as the Act) applicable to workers and former workers of Atlantic Southeast Airlines, a Subsidiary of Skywest, Inc., Airport Customer Division, Fort Smith, Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00081 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Impact date Arkansas (subject firm). AR 35. Workers at the subject firm (subject worker group) provided airline ground services, such as baggage handling, at the Forth Smith, Arkansas airport. AR 8, 14, 17, 25–26, 34. The Department’s Notice of negative determination was published in the Federal Register on November 17, 2009 (74 FR 59251). AR 48. The negative determination stated that the subject firm did not import services like or directly competitive with the services supplied by the subject workers in the period under investigation nor shift the supply of these services to a foreign country during this period. A customer survey was not conducted because the subject firm’s customers were private individuals who traveled through Fort Smith, Arkansas airport. AR 35–38. By application dated October 19, 2009, a petitioner requested administrative reconsideration on the Department’s negative determination. In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner alleged that workers at the subject firm provided services to individuals employed at firms that employed workers eligible to apply for TAA and that workers at the subject firm should also be eligible to apply for TAA as ‘‘downstream producers’’ to these firms. AR 42–43. Because the petitioner did not provide information that had not been previously considered, the Department E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM 21SEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 182 (Tuesday, September 21, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57514-57517]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23496]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment
assistance for workers by (TA-W) number issued during the period of
August 30, 2010 through September 3, 2010.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to
apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility
requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the following must be satisfied:
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) The sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased
absolutely; and
(3) One of the following must be satisfied:
(A) Imports of articles or services like or directly competitive
with articles produced or services supplied by such firm have
increased;
(B) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles
into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are
directly incorporated, have increased;
(C) Imports of articles directly incorporating one or more
component parts produced outside the United States that are like or
directly competitive with imports of articles incorporating one or more
component parts produced by such firm have increased;
(D) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles
which are produced directly using services supplied by such firm, have
increased; and
(4) The increase in imports contributed importantly to such
workers' separation or threat of separation and to the decline in the
sales or production of such firm; or
II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the following must be satisfied:
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) One of the following must be satisfied:
(A) there has been a shift by the workers' firm to a foreign
country in the production of articles or supply of services like or
directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm;
(B) there has been an acquisition from a foreign country by the
workers' firm of articles/services that are like or directly
competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm; and
(3) The shift/acquisition contributed importantly to the workers'
separation or threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in public agencies and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must
be met.
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the public
agency have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to
become totally or partially separated;

[[Page 57515]]

(2) The public agency has acquired from a foreign country services
like or directly competitive with services which are supplied by such
agency; and
(3) The acquisition of services contributed importantly to such
workers' separation or threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected secondary workers of a firm and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(c) of the Act must
be met.
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) The workers' firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a
firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of
eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, and such supply or
production is related to the article or service that was the basis for
such certification; and
(3) Either--
(A) the workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it
supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least
20 percent of the production or sales of the workers' firm; or
(B) a loss of business by the workers' firm with the firm described
in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers' separation or
threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in firms identified by the International Trade
Commission and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply
for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility
requirements of Section 222(f) of the Act must be met.
(1) The workers' firm is publicly identified by name by the
International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an
investigation resulting in--
(A) An affirmative determination of serious injury or threat
thereof under section 202(b)(1);
(B) An affirmative determination of market disruption or threat
thereof under section 421(b)(1); or
(C) An affirmative final determination of material injury or threat
thereof under section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A));
(2) The petition is filed during the 1-year period beginning on the
date on which--
(A) a summary of the report submitted to the President by the
International Trade Commission under section 202(f)(1) with respect to
the affirmative determination described in paragraph (1)(A) is
published in the Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); or
(B) notice of an affirmative determination described in
subparagraph (1) is published in the Federal Register; and
(3) The workers have become totally or partially separated from the
workers' firm within--
(A) the 1-year period described in paragraph (2); or
(B) notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the 1-year period preceding
the 1-year period described in paragraph (2).

Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance

The following certifications have been issued. The date following
the company name and location of each determination references the
impact date for all workers of such determination.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been
met.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
72,531........................... Riley Power, Inc., Vogt- Erie, PA............ October 2, 2008.
Nem, Inc. and Babcock
Power, Inc.
73,656........................... JK Products and Services, Jonesboro, AR....... March 5, 2009.
Inc., Leased Workers Aid
Temporary Services,
Inc., Staffmark, and
Appleone, etc.
73,965........................... Angell-Demmel North Dayton, OH.......... April 9, 2009.
America Corp, Sellner
Corporation.
74,025........................... Babcock Lumber Company, St. Marys, PA....... April 23, 2009.
Hardwood Division;
leased Workers Staff
Right Services, etc.
74,134........................... Reynoldsville Holding Reynoldsville, PA... May 10, 2009.
Company.
74,267........................... Mason County Forest Shelton, WA......... June 14, 2009.
Products.
74,277........................... Westcode, Inc............ Binghamton, NY...... June 21, 2009.
74,307........................... Brockway Mould, Inc., Brockport, PA....... June 25, 2010.
Ross Mould, Inc.
74,384........................... Shipbuilders of Manitowoc, WI....... June 8, 2009.
Wisconsin, Inc., Burger
Boat Company; Leased
Workers Aerotek and
Skilled Trade Services.
74,534........................... DuPont Teijin Films, Florence, SC........ November 7, 2009.
Leased Workers from
Schenkers Logistics, Inc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services) of the Trade Act
have been met.

[[Page 57516]]

74,008........................... Cooper, Crouse-Hinds MTL, West Melbourne, FL.. April 22, 2009.
Inc., Cooper, Crouse-
Hinds; Cooper
Industries; Leased
Workers from
Accountemps, etc.
74,028........................... Imhauser Corporation..... Romney, WV.......... April 28, 2009.
74,065........................... ShopKo Stores Operating Green Bay, WI....... May 7, 2009.
Co., LLC, Information
Services Division; SKO
Group Holding, LLC;
Leased Workers, etc.
74,085........................... Avery Dennison, Leased Lenoir, NC.......... May 13, 2009.
Workers from Adecco, Inc.
74,086........................... Unisys Corporation, Austin, TX.......... May 13, 2009.
Managed Service Center;
Leased Workers from Apex
Systems and Pinnacle.
74,142........................... World Color Mt. Morris, Schaumburg, IL...... May 21, 2009.
IL LLC, Premedia Chicago
Division; Leased Workers
from The Creative Group,
etc.
74,377........................... Sony Pictures Culver City, CA..... June 28, 2009.
Entertainment, IT
Department, Leased
Workers from Banctec,
CCP Global, Invision,
etc.
74,414........................... PricewaterhouseCoopers Cleveland, OH....... July 13, 2009.
LLP, Internal Firm
Services Group.
74,454........................... LSI Corporation, Fort Collins, CO.... July 22, 2009.
Integrated Circuit
Testing Department.
74,455........................... Uniboard Fostoria, Inc., Fostoria, OH........ July 26, 2009.
Uniboard Canada.
74,483........................... Wood Group Component East Windsor, CT.... August 3, 2009.
Repair Services, Inc.,
Wood Group Gas Turbine
Services, Inc.
74,505........................... Neff Motivation, Inc., Unadilla, GA........ August 9, 2009.
Visant Corporation.
74,518........................... Peco II by Lineage Power, Galion, OH.......... July 27, 2009.
Leased Workers from
Waycraft, Incorporated.
74,524........................... TD Ameritrade, Inc., TD Fort Worth, TX...... August 5, 2009.
Ameritrade Clearing,
Inc.; TD Ameritrade
Holding Corporation etc.
74,530........................... Hewlett Packard Company, Auburn and other August 4, 2009.
Human Resources Division. Cities in
California, CA.
74,530A.......................... Hewlett Packard Company, Boise, ID........... August 4, 2009.
Human Resources Division.
74,530B.......................... Hewlett Packard Company, Ellicott City, MD... August 4, 2009.
Human Resources Division.
74,530C.......................... Hewlett Packard Company, Canton, MI.......... August 4, 2009.
Human Resources Division.
74,530D.......................... Hewlett Packard Company, Wake Forest, NC..... August 4, 2009.
Human Resources Division.
74,530E.......................... Hewlett Packard Company, Corvallis, OR....... August 4, 2009.
Human Resources Division.
74,530F.......................... Hewlett Packard Company, Blue Bell, PA....... August 4, 2009
Human Resources Division.
74,530G.......................... Hewlett Packard Company, Houston and other August 4, 2009.
Human Resources Division. Cities in Texas, TX.
74,530H.......................... Hewlett Packard Company, Herndon, VA......... August 4, 2009.
Human Resources Division.
74,530I.......................... Hewlett Packard Company, Vancouver, WA....... August 4, 2009.
Human Resources Division.
74,545........................... HAVI Logistics, North Bloomingdale, IL.... August 11, 2009.
America, HAVI Group, LP;
Leased Worker from
Express Personnel
Services, etc.
74,550........................... Artisans, Inc............ Glen Flora, WI...... August 20, 2009.
74,552........................... CKE Restaurants, Inc., Anaheim, CA......... August 18, 2009.
Client Services
Division; Leased Workers
from B2B Staffing
Services.
74,561........................... Hilton Reservations and Hemet, CA........... August 11, 2009.
Customer Care, Hemet
Division of Hilton
Worldwide.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(c) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible
to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met.

Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance

In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the
eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met
for the reasons specified.
The investigation revealed that the criteria under
paragraphs(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift in
production or services to a foreign country) of section 222 have not
been met.

[[Page 57517]]

73,722........................... Sojitz Corporation of Seattle, WA......... ............................
America, Sojitz
Corporation; Forest
Products Department.
74,035........................... OSRAM Sylvania, Siemens.. Warren, PA.......... ............................
74,246........................... Bank of America, Card State College, PA... ............................
Customer Assistance
Division.
74,290........................... Supermedia LLC, Idearc Middleton, MA....... ............................
Media LLC; SuperMedia
Information Services
LLC; Client Care, etc..
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Determinations Terminating Investigations of Petitions for Worker
Adjustment Assistance

After notice of the petitions was published in the Federal Register
and on the Department's Web site, as required by Section 221 of the Act
(19 U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated investigations of these
petitions.
The following determinations terminating investigations were issued
because the petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn.

The following determinations terminating investigations were issued
because the petitioning groups of workers are covered by active
certifications. Consequently, further investigation in these cases
would serve no purpose since the petitioning group of workers cannot be
covered by more than one certification at a time.

I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued
during the period of August 30, 2010 through September 3, 2010. Copies
of these determinations may be requested under the Freedom of
Information Act. Requests may be submitted by fax, courier services, or
mail to FOIA Disclosure Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance
(ETA), U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20210 or tofoiarequest@dol.gov. These determinations
also are available on the Department's Web site at https://www.doleta.gov/tradeact under the searchable listing of determinations.

Dated: September 10, 2010.
Elliott S. Kushner
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-23496 Filed 9-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.