Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance, 56141-56145 [2010-22922]
Download as PDF
56141
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 15, 2010 / Notices
collection instruments are clearly
understood, and the impact of collection
requirements on respondents can be
properly assessed. Currently, the
Employment and Training
Administration is soliciting comments
concerning the collection of data about
the YB Reporting System which expires
on October 31, 2010.
A copy of the proposed information
collection request (ICR) can be obtained
by contacting the office listed below in
the addressee section of this notice.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted to the office listed in the
addressee’s section below on or before
November 15, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
to Anne Stom, Room N–4508,
Employment and Training
Administration, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210.
Telephone number: 202–693–3377 (this
is not a toll-free number). Fax: 202–693–
3113. E-mail: stom.anne@dol.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
This is a request for the Department
of Labor, Employment and Training
Administration’s (ETA) request to
continue the reporting and
recordkeeping requirements of the
YouthBuild (YB) program. This
reporting structure features
standardized data collection for program
participants and quarterly progress and
Management Information System (MIS)
report formats. All data collection and
reporting is done by YouthBuild
grantees.
The quarterly progress reports provide
a detailed, narrative account of program
activities, accomplishments, and
progress toward performance outcomes
during the quarter. The quarterly
performance reports include aggregate
and participant-level information on
demographic characteristics, types of
services received, placements,
outcomes, and follow-up status.
Specifically, these reports collect data
on individuals who receive education,
occupational skill training, leadership
development services, and other
services essential to preparing at-risk
youth for high-wage, high-demand
occupations through YouthBuild
programs.
The accuracy, reliability, and
comparability of program reports
submitted by grantees using federal
funds are fundamental elements of good
public administration and are necessary
tools for maintaining and demonstrating
system integrity. The use of a standard
set of data elements, definitions, and
specifications at all levels of the
workforce system helps improve the
quality of performance information that
is received by ETA.
II. Review Focus
The Department of Labor is
particularly interested in comments
which:
* Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
* Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
* Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
* Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submissions
of responses
III. Current Actions
Type of Review: Extension without
changes.
Title: YouthBuild (YB) Reporting
System.
OMB Number: OMB 1205–0464.
Affected Public: Grantees—Not for
Profit institutions.
Form(s): ETA–9138, Standardized
Quarterly Performance Report—
YouthBuild Program; and ETA–9143,
WorkSite Description.
Total respondents
Frequency
Participant Data Collection ................
6,000 youth participants
220 grantees .................
220 grantees .................
220 grantees .................
Collected by grantees,
continual.
Annually .........................
Quarterly ........................
Quarterly ........................
6,000
Housing Site Description ETA–9143
Quarterly narrative progress report ...
Quarterly performance report. ETA–
9138.
Totals ..........................................
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Average time
per
response
(hours)
Total annual
responses
Form/activity
220 grantees .................
........................................
7760
Total Annual Burden Cost for
Respondents: $0.
Comments submitted in response to
this comment request will be
summarized and/or included in the
request for Office of Management and
Budget approval of the information
collection request; they will also
become a matter of public record.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:57 Sep 14, 2010
Jkt 220001
Dated: Signed at Washington, DC, this 3rd
day of September, 2010.
Jane Oates,
Assistant Secretary, Employment and
Training Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010–22927 Filed 9–14–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FT–P
1.8
220
880
880
40
16
16
..........................
Total annual
burden hours
10,800
8,800
14,080
14,080
38,960
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Notice of Determinations Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19
U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor
herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to
apply for trade adjustment assistance for
workers by (TA–W) number issued
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\15SEN1.SGM
15SEN1
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
56142
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 15, 2010 / Notices
during the period of August 23, 2010
through August 27, 2010.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section
222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the
following must be satisfied:
(1) A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
(2) The sales or production, or both,
of such firm have decreased absolutely;
and
(3) One of the following must be
satisfied:
(A) Imports of articles or services like
or directly competitive with articles
produced or services supplied by such
firm have increased;
(B) Imports of articles like or directly
competitive with articles into which one
or more component parts produced by
such firm are directly incorporated,
have increased;
(C) Imports of articles directly
incorporating one or more component
parts produced outside the United
States that are like or directly
competitive with imports of articles
incorporating one or more component
parts produced by such firm have
increased;
(D) Imports of articles like or directly
competitive with articles which are
produced directly using services
supplied by such firm, have increased;
and
(4) The increase in imports
contributed importantly to such
workers’ separation or threat of
separation and to the decline in the
sales or production of such firm; or
II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the
following must be satisfied:
(1) A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
(2) One of the following must be
satisfied:
(A) There has been a shift by the
workers’ firm to a foreign country in the
production of articles or supply of
services like or directly competitive
with those produced/supplied by the
workers’ firm;
(B) There has been an acquisition
from a foreign country by the workers’
firm of articles/services that are like or
directly competitive with those
produced/supplied by the workers’ firm;
and
(3) The shift/acquisition contributed
importantly to the workers’ separation
or threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in public agencies and
a certification issued regarding
eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section
222(b) of the Act must be met.
(1) A significant number or proportion
of the workers in the public agency have
become totally or partially separated, or
are threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
(2) The public agency has acquired
from a foreign country services like or
directly competitive with services
which are supplied by such agency; and
(3) The acquisition of services
contributed importantly to such
workers’ separation or threat of
separation.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for adversely
affected secondary workers of a firm and
a certification issued regarding
eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section
222(c) of the Act must be met.
(1) A significant number or proportion
of the workers in the workers’ firm have
become totally or partially separated, or
are threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
(2) The workers’ firm is a Supplier or
Downstream Producer to a firm that
employed a group of workers who
received a certification of eligibility
under Section 222(a) of the Act, and
such supply or production is related to
the article or service that was the basis
for such certification; and
(3) Either—
(A) The workers’ firm is a supplier
and the component parts it supplied to
the firm described in paragraph (2)
accounted for at least 20 percent of the
production or sales of the workers’ firm;
or
(B) A loss of business by the workers’
firm with the firm described in
paragraph (2) contributed importantly to
the workers’ separation or threat of
separation.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in firms identified by
the International Trade Commission and
a certification issued regarding
eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section 222(f)
of the Act must be met.
(1) The workers’ firm is publicly
identified by name by the International
Trade Commission as a member of a
domestic industry in an investigation
resulting in—
(A) An affirmative determination of
serious injury or threat thereof under
section 202(b)(1);
(B) An affirmative determination of
market disruption or threat thereof
under section 421(b)(1); or
(C) An affirmative final determination
of material injury or threat thereof under
section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of
the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.
1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A));
(2) The petition is filed during the 1year period beginning on the date on
which—
(A) A summary of the report
submitted to the President by the
International Trade Commission under
section 202(f)(1) with respect to the
affirmative determination described in
paragraph (1)(A) is published in the
Federal Register under section 202(f)(3);
or
(B) Notice of an affirmative
determination described in
subparagraph (1) is published in the
Federal Register; and
(3) The workers have become totally
or partially separated from the workers’
firm within—
(A) The 1-year period described in
paragraph (2); or
(B) Notwithstanding section 223(b)(1),
the 1-year period preceding the 1-year
period described in paragraph (2).
Affirmative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been
issued. The date following the company
name and location of each
determination references the impact
date for all workers of such
determination.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the
Trade Act have been met.
TA–W No.
Subject firm
Location
73,873 ................
73,873A ..............
73,903 ................
Teleperformance USA Corporation, TPUSA, Inc ......................................
Teleperformance USA Corporation, TPUSA, Inc ......................................
Owens-Illinois, Inc., Leased Workers from Manpower, Inc .......................
Salt Lake City, UT ........
Lindon, UT ...................
Clarion, PA ...................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:57 Sep 14, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\15SEN1.SGM
15SEN1
Impact date
March 30, 2009.
March 30, 2009.
April 9, 2009.
56143
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 15, 2010 / Notices
TA–W No.
Subject firm
Location
73,982 ................
74,133 ................
74,171 ................
Smiths Medical PM, Inc., Leased Workers from Aerotek and Spherion ...
Time Sensitive Circuits ..............................................................................
Waytec Electronics Corporation, Leased Workers from Alpha Omega,
Kelly Services, and ManPower.
Temple-Inland ............................................................................................
Soo Tractor Sweeprake Company .............................................................
Cinram Distribution, LLC, Cinram International; Simi Valley Distribution
Center; Leased Workers, etc.
Waukesha, WI ..............
Amesbury, MA .............
Lynchburg, VA .............
April 14, 2009.
May 20, 2009.
May 27, 2009.
Evansville, IN ...............
Sioux City, IA ...............
Simi Valley, CA ............
June 7, 2009.
June 12, 2009.
July 7, 2009.
74,237 ................
74,279 ................
74,357 ................
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or
Impact date
services) of the Trade Act have been
met.
TA–W No.
Subject firm
Location
72,869 ................
Dell, Inc., Global Command Center and Proactive Maintenance Divisions; Leased Workers, etc.
Kimberly-Clark Global Sales, Inc., Kimberly-Clark Corporation; Leased
Workers from Stafflogix Corporation.
Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc., Kimberly-Clark Corporation; Leased
Workers from Stafflogix Corporation.
SunGard Public Sector, SunGard Data Systems ......................................
Hewlett Packard/EDS, Primary Delivery Engineer Unit, Working On-Site
At Proctor & Gamble.
International Business Machines (IBM), Service Parts Organizations ......
Affiliated Computer Services, Inc., Xerox Corporation, Workers of ACS
Application Management Services, etc.
Mattel, Inc., Global Logistics Org., Distribution Center, Leased Workers
Select Staffing.
International Business Machines (IBM), Global Technology Services Delivery Division.
LF USA, Inc., Li & Fung Limited, Leased Workers from Winston Staffing
RR Donnelley, Digital Solutions Center Division .......................................
Polaris Industries, Leased Workers from Westaff .....................................
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Electronic Data Management Division; Leased Workers from RCM Technologies, etc.
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Tyler Plant; Leased Workers Unicco
Contracted Services and Kelly Services.
McGuire Furniture Company, Kohler Co., Leased Workers from Manpower and Ajilon.
Harman Consumer, Inc., Engineering Department; Division of Harman
International Industries, Inc..
EMC Corporation, Information Infrastructure Products, Ionix Software
Engineers.
EMC Corporation, Information Infrastructure Products, Ionix Software
Engineers.
EMC Corporation, Information Infrastructure Products, Ionix Software
Engineers.
EMC Corporation, Information Infrastructure Products; Ionix Software
Engineers; etc.
EMC Corporation, Information Infrastructure Products; Ionix Software
Engineers.
EMC Corporation, Information Infrastructure Products; Ionix Software
Engineers.
Road 9, Inc., Leased Workers From TPA–Administaff Companies II, LP
RR Donnelley, Digital Solutions Center Division; Leased Workers from
Quality Personnel.
Anthem Insurance Companies, Inc., Wellpoint, Finance Accounting,
Leased Workers from Rogert Half/Accounting etc.
Oklahoma City, OK ......
November 11, 2008.
Neenah, WI ..................
December 18, 2008.
Neenah, WI ..................
December 18, 2008.
Lake Mary, FL ..............
Cincinnati, OH ..............
March 5, 2009.
March 19, 2009.
Mechanicsburg, PA ......
Dallas, TX ....................
March 29, 2009.
May 24, 2009.
City of Industry, CA ......
May 17, 2009.
Greenville, SC ..............
May 26, 2009.
New York, NY ..............
Pontiac, IL ....................
Osceola, WI .................
East Hanover, NJ .........
May 21, 2009.
June 29, 2009.
June 28, 2009.
July 9, 2009.
Tyler, TX ......................
June 30, 2009.
San Francisco, CA .......
July 8, 2009.
Northridge, CA .............
August 2, 2009.
Research Triangle
Park, NC.
Hopkinton, MA .............
July 30, 2009.
July 30, 2009.
Alexandria, VA .............
July 30, 2009.
Berkeley Heights, NJ ...
July 30, 2009.
Richardson, TX ............
July 30, 2009.
White Plains, NY ..........
July 30, 2009.
Greenwood Village, CO
Glasgow, KY ................
August 10, 2009.
August 11, 2009.
Mason, OH ...................
August 13, 2009.
73,153 ................
73,153A ..............
73,657 ................
73,809 ................
73,909 ................
74,141 ................
74,156 ................
74,164 ................
74,185
74,319
74,336
74,368
................
................
................
................
74,386 ................
74,413 ................
74,465 ................
74,472 ................
74,472A ..............
74,473 ................
74,474 ................
74,479 ................
74,480 ................
74,503 ................
74,523 ................
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
74,531 ................
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(c) (supplier to a firm whose workers
are certified eligible to apply for TAA)
of the Trade Act have been met.
TA–W No.
Subject firm
Location
73,610 ................
Visteon Corporation, Springfield Plant; Leased Workers MSX International, Adecco, Manpower.
Springfield, OH .............
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:57 Sep 14, 2010
Jkt 220001
Impact date
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\15SEN1.SGM
15SEN1
Impact date
March 2, 2009.
56144
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 15, 2010 / Notices
Negative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the
investigation revealed that the eligibility
criteria for worker adjustment assistance
have not been met for the reasons
specified.
The investigation revealed that the
criterion under paragraph (a)(1), or
TA–W No.
Subject firm
73,335 ................
73,335A ..............
Arvin Technologies, Inc ..............................................................................
ArvinMeritor, Inc .........................................................................................
The investigation revealed that the
criteria under paragraphs (a)(2)(A)(i)
Location
TA–W No.
RSG Forest Products, Inc ..........................................................................
Location
Techline, USA, Leased Workers from Express Employment Professionals.
Loadcraft Industries, Ltd ............................................................................
Enesco, LLC, Gund Division, Distribution Center ......................................
Wausau Window And Wall Systems, A Subsidiary of Apogee Enterprises, Inc.
RMC Pacific Materials, Inc., Cemex, Inc ...................................................
Northwestern Tool & Die, LLC ...................................................................
Colfax Envelope Corporation .....................................................................
San Francisco Chronicle, Hearst Communications, Leased Workers
from Correstaff, etc.
The Eastridge Group of Staffing Companies, Contractors & Builders Division; Bosa Holding, Inc.
Ach Food Company, Inc ............................................................................
KDH Defense Systems, Incorporated ........................................................
Wisconsin Bell, Inc., Doing Business As Wisconsin Bell; Consumer Centers Sales and Services.
Smart-Sox, Inc ...........................................................................................
US Airways, Inc., Port Columbus, Fleet Services .....................................
country) of section 222 have not been
met.
Subject firm
73,045 ................
73,137 ................
73,479 ................
73,508 ................
73,551
73,685
73,815
74,079
................
................
................
................
74,089 ................
74,118 ................
74,192 ................
74,375 ................
74,458 ................
74,462 ................
Determinations Terminating
Investigations of Petitions for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
Location
TA–W No.
Brady, TX.
Edison, NJ.
Wausau, WI.
Davenport, CA.
Vernon Hills, IL.
Buffalo Grove, IL.
Union City, CA.
San Diego, CA.
Jacksonville, IL.
Waynesburg, PA.
Milwaukee, WI.
Thomasville, NC.
Columbus, OH.
EMC Corporation, Information Infrastructure Products, Ionix Software
Engineers.
EMC Corporation, Information Infrastructure Products, Ionix Software
Engineers.
EMC Corporation, Information Infrastructure Products, Ionix Software
Engineers.
The following determinations
terminating investigations were issued
because the petitioner has requested
that the petition be withdrawn.
Subject firm
74,475 ................
74,476 ................
74,477 ................
The following determinations
terminating investigations were issued
because the petitioning groups of
Location
Subject firm
74,478 ................
EMC Corporation, Information Infrastructure Products, Ionix Software
Engineers.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:57 Sep 14, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00094
Colorado Springs, CO.
Colorado Springs, CO.
no purpose since the petitioning group
of workers cannot be covered by more
than one certification at a time.
Location
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Impact date
Berkeley Heights, NJ.
workers are covered by active
certifications. Consequently, further
investigation in these cases would serve
TA–W No.
Impact date
Waunakee, WI.
on the Department’s website, as
required by Section 221 of the Act (19
U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated
investigations of these petitions.
After notice of the petitions was
published in the Federal Register and
Impact date
Kalama, WA.
(increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift
in production or services to a foreign
TA–W No.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
services to a foreign country) of section
222 have not been met.
Subject firm
74,235 ................
Impact date
Troy, MI.
Troy, MI.
(decline in sales or production, or both)
and (a)(2)(B) (shift in production or
The investigation revealed that the
criteria under paragraphs (a)(2)(A)
(b)(1), or (c)(1) (employment decline or
threat of separation) of section 222 has
not been met.
Duluth, GA.
E:\FR\FM\15SEN1.SGM
15SEN1
Impact date
56145
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 15, 2010 / Notices
TA–W No.
Subject firm
74,535 ................
The TriZetto Group, Inc. ............................................................................
I hereby certify that the
aforementioned determinations were
issued during the period of August 23,
2010 through August 27, 2010. Copies of
these determinations may be requested
under the Freedom of Information Act.
Requests may be submitted by fax,
courier services, or mail to FOIA
Disclosure Officer, Office of Trade
Adjustment Assistance (ETA), U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 or
tofoiarequest@dol.gov. These
determinations also are available on the
Department’s website at https://
www.doleta.gov/tradeact under the
searchable listing of determinations.
Dated: September 3, 2010.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010–22922 Filed 9–14–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
Location
Impact date
Greenwood Village,
CO.
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Investigations Regarding Certifications
of Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
Petitions have been filed with the
Secretary of Labor under Section 221(a)
of the Trade Act of 1974 (‘‘the Act’’) and
are identified in the Appendix to this
notice. Upon receipt of these petitions,
the Director of the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance, Employment
and Training Administration, has
instituted investigations pursuant to
Section 221(a) of the Act.
The purpose of each of the
investigations is to determine whether
the workers are eligible to apply for
adjustment assistance under Title II,
Chapter 2, of the Act. The investigations
will further relate, as appropriate, to the
determination of the date on which total
or partial separations began or
threatened to begin and the subdivision
of the firm involved.
The petitioners or any other persons
showing a substantial interest in the
subject matter of the investigations may
request a public hearing, provided such
request is filed in writing with the
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment
Assistance, at the address shown below,
not later than September 27, 2010.
Interested persons are invited to
submit written comments regarding the
subject matter of the investigations to
the Director, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance, at the address
shown below, not later than September
27, 2010.
Copies of these petitions may be
requested under the Freedom of
Information Act. Requests may be
submitted by fax, courier services, or
mail, to FOIA Disclosure Officer, Office
of Trade Adjustment Assistance (ETA),
U.S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20210 or to foiarequest@dol.gov.
Signed at Washington, DC this 2nd of
September 2010.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
APPENDIX
[TAA petitions instituted between 8/23/10 and 8/27/10]
Subject firm
(petitioners)
Location
Harris Corporation—Broadcast Communications Division (Workers)
BMC Software (State/One-Stop) .........................................................
Annex Manufacturing, LLC (Workers) .................................................
Reader’s Digest (Workers) ..................................................................
Certainteed Corporation (Company) ....................................................
3M IMTEC (Company) .........................................................................
HAVI Logistics, North America (Workers) ...........................................
Medline Industries, Inc. (Company) .....................................................
HAVI Logistics NA–DAVIS (Workers) ..................................................
Bainbridge Mills (Company) .................................................................
Algonac Cast Products (Workers) .......................................................
Artisans, Inc. (Company) .....................................................................
Vaughan Furniture Company (Company) ............................................
CKE Restaurants, Inc. (Company) ......................................................
Fiserv, Inc. (State/One-Stop) ...............................................................
IBM (State/One-Stop) ..........................................................................
White Pine Copper Refinery (Union) ...................................................
Telair International, Incorporated (Company) ......................................
Brinker International (Workers) ............................................................
United Solar Ovonic (Workers) ............................................................
Solo Cup Company (Company) ...........................................................
Wyman-Gordon, PCC (Union) .............................................................
Hilton World Wide Reservation (Workers) ...........................................
Express Scripts (Workers) ...................................................................
Riddell, Inc. (Company) .......................................................................
Darlington Auto (State/One-Stop) ........................................................
Smead Manufacturing Company (Company) ......................................
Bob Evans Farms, Inc. (Workers) .......................................................
Chesapeake, VA .........
Houston, TX ................
Lyons, NY ...................
Greendale, WI .............
Mountaintop, PA .........
Ardmore, OK ...............
Bloomingdale, IL .........
Oldsmar, FL ................
Davis, CA ....................
Bainbridge, GA ............
Algonac, MI .................
Glen Flora, WI .............
Galax, VA ....................
Anaheim, CA ...............
Owing Mills, MD ..........
San Francisco, CA ......
White Pine, MI ............
Simi Valley, CA ...........
Dallas, TX ...................
Auburn Hills, MI ...........
Springfield, MO ...........
Houston, TX ................
Hemet, CA ..................
Plano, TX ....................
San Antonio, TX ..........
Darlington, SC .............
McGregor, TX .............
Galva, IL ......................
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
TA–W
74539
74540
74541
74542
74543
74544
74545
74546
74547
74548
74549
74550
74551
74552
74553
74554
74555
74556
74557
74558
74559
74560
74561
74562
74563
74564
74565
74566
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:57 Sep 14, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\15SEN1.SGM
Date of
institution
15SEN1
08/23/10
08/23/10
08/23/10
08/23/10
08/23/10
08/23/10
08/23/10
08/23/10
08/23/10
08/23/10
08/23/10
08/23/10
08/23/10
08/23/10
08/23/10
08/23/10
08/23/10
08/25/10
08/25/10
08/25/10
08/25/10
08/25/10
08/25/10
08/25/10
08/27/10
08/27/10
08/27/10
08/27/10
Date of
petition
08/18/10
07/22/10
08/17/10
08/18/10
08/12/10
07/28/10
08/11/10
08/16/10
08/11/10
08/18/10
08/18/10
08/20/10
08/17/10
08/18/10
08/18/10
08/20/10
08/06/10
07/20/10
08/06/10
08/23/10
08/24/10
08/20/10
08/11/10
08/24/10
08/20/10
08/18/10
08/25/10
08/24/10
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 178 (Wednesday, September 15, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56141-56145]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22922]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment
assistance for workers by (TA-W) number issued
[[Page 56142]]
during the period of August 23, 2010 through August 27, 2010.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to
apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility
requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the following must be satisfied:
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) The sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased
absolutely; and
(3) One of the following must be satisfied:
(A) Imports of articles or services like or directly competitive
with articles produced or services supplied by such firm have
increased;
(B) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles
into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are
directly incorporated, have increased;
(C) Imports of articles directly incorporating one or more
component parts produced outside the United States that are like or
directly competitive with imports of articles incorporating one or more
component parts produced by such firm have increased;
(D) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles
which are produced directly using services supplied by such firm, have
increased; and
(4) The increase in imports contributed importantly to such
workers' separation or threat of separation and to the decline in the
sales or production of such firm; or
II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the following must be satisfied:
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) One of the following must be satisfied:
(A) There has been a shift by the workers' firm to a foreign
country in the production of articles or supply of services like or
directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm;
(B) There has been an acquisition from a foreign country by the
workers' firm of articles/services that are like or directly
competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm; and
(3) The shift/acquisition contributed importantly to the workers'
separation or threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in public agencies and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must
be met.
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the public
agency have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to
become totally or partially separated;
(2) The public agency has acquired from a foreign country services
like or directly competitive with services which are supplied by such
agency; and
(3) The acquisition of services contributed importantly to such
workers' separation or threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected secondary workers of a firm and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(c) of the Act must
be met.
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) The workers' firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a
firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of
eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, and such supply or
production is related to the article or service that was the basis for
such certification; and
(3) Either--
(A) The workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it
supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least
20 percent of the production or sales of the workers' firm; or
(B) A loss of business by the workers' firm with the firm described
in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers' separation or
threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in firms identified by the International Trade
Commission and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply
for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility
requirements of Section 222(f) of the Act must be met.
(1) The workers' firm is publicly identified by name by the
International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an
investigation resulting in--
(A) An affirmative determination of serious injury or threat
thereof under section 202(b)(1);
(B) An affirmative determination of market disruption or threat
thereof under section 421(b)(1); or
(C) An affirmative final determination of material injury or threat
thereof under section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A));
(2) The petition is filed during the 1-year period beginning on the
date on which--
(A) A summary of the report submitted to the President by the
International Trade Commission under section 202(f)(1) with respect to
the affirmative determination described in paragraph (1)(A) is
published in the Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); or
(B) Notice of an affirmative determination described in
subparagraph (1) is published in the Federal Register; and
(3) The workers have become totally or partially separated from the
workers' firm within--
(A) The 1-year period described in paragraph (2); or
(B) Notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the 1-year period preceding
the 1-year period described in paragraph (2).
Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been issued. The date following
the company name and location of each determination references the
impact date for all workers of such determination.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been
met.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
73,873....................... Teleperformance USA Salt Lake City, UT...... March 30, 2009.
Corporation, TPUSA, Inc.
73,873A...................... Teleperformance USA Lindon, UT.............. March 30, 2009.
Corporation, TPUSA, Inc.
73,903....................... Owens-Illinois, Inc., Leased Clarion, PA............. April 9, 2009.
Workers from Manpower, Inc.
[[Page 56143]]
73,982....................... Smiths Medical PM, Inc., Waukesha, WI............ April 14, 2009.
Leased Workers from Aerotek
and Spherion.
74,133....................... Time Sensitive Circuits...... Amesbury, MA............ May 20, 2009.
74,171....................... Waytec Electronics Lynchburg, VA........... May 27, 2009.
Corporation, Leased Workers
from Alpha Omega, Kelly
Services, and ManPower.
74,237....................... Temple-Inland................ Evansville, IN.......... June 7, 2009.
74,279....................... Soo Tractor Sweeprake Company Sioux City, IA.......... June 12, 2009.
74,357....................... Cinram Distribution, LLC, Simi Valley, CA......... July 7, 2009.
Cinram International; Simi
Valley Distribution Center;
Leased Workers, etc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services) of the Trade Act
have been met.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
72,869....................... Dell, Inc., Global Command Oklahoma City, OK....... November 11, 2008.
Center and Proactive
Maintenance Divisions;
Leased Workers, etc.
73,153....................... Kimberly-Clark Global Sales, Neenah, WI.............. December 18, 2008.
Inc., Kimberly-Clark
Corporation; Leased Workers
from Stafflogix Corporation.
73,153A...................... Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Neenah, WI.............. December 18, 2008.
Inc., Kimberly-Clark
Corporation; Leased Workers
from Stafflogix Corporation.
73,657....................... SunGard Public Sector, Lake Mary, FL........... March 5, 2009.
SunGard Data Systems.
73,809....................... Hewlett Packard/EDS, Primary Cincinnati, OH.......... March 19, 2009.
Delivery Engineer Unit,
Working On-Site At Proctor &
Gamble.
73,909....................... International Business Mechanicsburg, PA....... March 29, 2009.
Machines (IBM), Service
Parts Organizations.
74,141....................... Affiliated Computer Services, Dallas, TX.............. May 24, 2009.
Inc., Xerox Corporation,
Workers of ACS Application
Management Services, etc.
74,156....................... Mattel, Inc., Global City of Industry, CA.... May 17, 2009.
Logistics Org., Distribution
Center, Leased Workers
Select Staffing.
74,164....................... International Business Greenville, SC.......... May 26, 2009.
Machines (IBM), Global
Technology Services Delivery
Division.
74,185....................... LF USA, Inc., Li & Fung New York, NY............ May 21, 2009.
Limited, Leased Workers from
Winston Staffing.
74,319....................... RR Donnelley, Digital Pontiac, IL............. June 29, 2009.
Solutions Center Division.
74,336....................... Polaris Industries, Leased Osceola, WI............. June 28, 2009.
Workers from Westaff.
74,368....................... Novartis Pharmaceuticals East Hanover, NJ........ July 9, 2009.
Corporation, Electronic Data
Management Division; Leased
Workers from RCM
Technologies, etc.
74,386....................... Goodyear Tire & Rubber Tyler, TX............... June 30, 2009.
Company, Tyler Plant; Leased
Workers Unicco Contracted
Services and Kelly Services.
74,413....................... McGuire Furniture Company, San Francisco, CA....... July 8, 2009.
Kohler Co., Leased Workers
from Manpower and Ajilon.
74,465....................... Harman Consumer, Inc., Northridge, CA.......... August 2, 2009.
Engineering Department;
Division of Harman
International Industries,
Inc..
74,472....................... EMC Corporation, Information Research Triangle Park, July 30, 2009.
Infrastructure Products, NC.
Ionix Software Engineers.
74,472A...................... EMC Corporation, Information Hopkinton, MA........... July 30, 2009.
Infrastructure Products,
Ionix Software Engineers.
74,473....................... EMC Corporation, Information Alexandria, VA.......... July 30, 2009.
Infrastructure Products,
Ionix Software Engineers.
74,474....................... EMC Corporation, Information Berkeley Heights, NJ.... July 30, 2009.
Infrastructure Products;
Ionix Software Engineers;
etc.
74,479....................... EMC Corporation, Information Richardson, TX.......... July 30, 2009.
Infrastructure Products;
Ionix Software Engineers.
74,480....................... EMC Corporation, Information White Plains, NY........ July 30, 2009.
Infrastructure Products;
Ionix Software Engineers.
74,503....................... Road 9, Inc., Leased Workers Greenwood Village, CO... August 10, 2009.
From TPA-Administaff
Companies II, LP.
74,523....................... RR Donnelley, Digital Glasgow, KY............. August 11, 2009.
Solutions Center Division;
Leased Workers from Quality
Personnel.
74,531....................... Anthem Insurance Companies, Mason, OH............... August 13, 2009.
Inc., Wellpoint, Finance
Accounting, Leased Workers
from Rogert Half/Accounting
etc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(c) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible
to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
73,610....................... Visteon Corporation, Springfield, OH......... March 2, 2009.
Springfield Plant; Leased
Workers MSX International,
Adecco, Manpower.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 56144]]
Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the
eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met
for the reasons specified.
The investigation revealed that the criterion under paragraph
(a)(1), or (b)(1), or (c)(1) (employment decline or threat of
separation) of section 222 has not been met.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
73,335....................... Arvin Technologies, Inc...... Troy, MI. ........................
73,335A...................... ArvinMeritor, Inc............ Troy, MI. ........................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The investigation revealed that the criteria under paragraphs
(a)(2)(A)(i) (decline in sales or production, or both) and (a)(2)(B)
(shift in production or services to a foreign country) of section 222
have not been met.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
74,235....................... RSG Forest Products, Inc..... Kalama, WA. ........................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The investigation revealed that the criteria under paragraphs
(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift in production or
services to a foreign country) of section 222 have not been met.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
73,045....................... Techline, USA, Leased Workers Waunakee, WI. ........................
from Express Employment
Professionals.
73,137....................... Loadcraft Industries, Ltd.... Brady, TX. ........................
73,479....................... Enesco, LLC, Gund Division, Edison, NJ. ........................
Distribution Center.
73,508....................... Wausau Window And Wall Wausau, WI. ........................
Systems, A Subsidiary of
Apogee Enterprises, Inc.
73,551....................... RMC Pacific Materials, Inc., Davenport, CA. ........................
Cemex, Inc.
73,685....................... Northwestern Tool & Die, LLC. Vernon Hills, IL. ........................
73,815....................... Colfax Envelope Corporation.. Buffalo Grove, IL. ........................
74,079....................... San Francisco Chronicle, Union City, CA. ........................
Hearst Communications,
Leased Workers from
Correstaff, etc.
74,089....................... The Eastridge Group of San Diego, CA. ........................
Staffing Companies,
Contractors & Builders
Division; Bosa Holding, Inc.
74,118....................... Ach Food Company, Inc........ Jacksonville, IL. ........................
74,192....................... KDH Defense Systems, Waynesburg, PA. ........................
Incorporated.
74,375....................... Wisconsin Bell, Inc., Doing Milwaukee, WI. ........................
Business As Wisconsin Bell;
Consumer Centers Sales and
Services.
74,458....................... Smart-Sox, Inc............... Thomasville, NC. ........................
74,462....................... US Airways, Inc., Port Columbus, OH. ........................
Columbus, Fleet Services.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Determinations Terminating Investigations of Petitions for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
After notice of the petitions was published in the Federal Register
and on the Department's website, as required by Section 221 of the Act
(19 U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated investigations of these
petitions.
The following determinations terminating investigations were issued
because the petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
74,475....................... EMC Corporation, Information Berkeley Heights, NJ. ........................
Infrastructure Products,
Ionix Software Engineers.
74,476....................... EMC Corporation, Information Colorado Springs, CO. ........................
Infrastructure Products,
Ionix Software Engineers.
74,477....................... EMC Corporation, Information Colorado Springs, CO. ........................
Infrastructure Products,
Ionix Software Engineers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following determinations terminating investigations were issued
because the petitioning groups of workers are covered by active
certifications. Consequently, further investigation in these cases
would serve no purpose since the petitioning group of workers cannot be
covered by more than one certification at a time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
74,478....................... EMC Corporation, Information Duluth, GA. ........................
Infrastructure Products,
Ionix Software Engineers.
[[Page 56145]]
74,535....................... The TriZetto Group, Inc...... Greenwood Village, CO. ........................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued
during the period of August 23, 2010 through August 27, 2010. Copies of
these determinations may be requested under the Freedom of Information
Act. Requests may be submitted by fax, courier services, or mail to
FOIA Disclosure Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance (ETA),
U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC
20210 or tofoiarequest@dol.gov. These determinations also are available
on the Department's website at https://www.doleta.gov/tradeact under the
searchable listing of determinations.
Dated: September 3, 2010.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-22922 Filed 9-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P